Revision as of 21:06, 23 November 2010 editWeijiBaikeBianji (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,316 edits →You're being discussed at AE…: I think Mathsci's comment was strictly praise of you, Ludwigs2← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:51, 13 June 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,304,843 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Ludwigs2/Archive 20) (bot | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|3=9 March 2013}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | ||
|maxarchivesize = 75K | |maxarchivesize = 75K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 20 | ||
|minthreadsleft = 0 | |minthreadsleft = 0 | ||
|algo = old(10d) | |algo = old(10d) | ||
Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{archives|auto=yes}} | {{archives|auto=yes}} | ||
== You're being discussed at AE… == | |||
]. | |||
Don’t worry, nobody’s accusing you of having done anything wrong. This thread is mostly just more accusations of wrongdoing from Mathsci against the editors that he disagrees with, this time being directed at me as well as two fairly new editors. But one of the new people has apparently read several of the arbitration pages, and is taking some of the advice that you offered about Mathsci there to heart. | |||
I’ve also referred there to the circumstances under which you first got involved in the race and intelligence article, based on what I can remember about it. I don’t ''think'' I’ve misremembered this—I looked at your contributions from 2009 to make sure—but you can correct me if I have. --] (]) 12:22, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
: Hi, Ludwigs2, I read Mathsci's suggestion to you, at the cited request for enforcement, to visit the request for enforcement about ] entirely as a friendly suggestion. I read what Mathsci wrote as saying that he appreciated your contribution to the discussion at ] as very helpful and as a sign that you have something helpful to contribute to the discussion at the ]. If I am making a correct inference from my life experience among my real-world neighbors and relatives and co-workers, what is happening here is an acknowledgement on Mathsci's part of one of your good deeds in the presence of the editing community, and an expression that bygones can be bygones and he can commend your participation to other editors in the future. Perhaps some editors in the referenced place can learn from the examples of the more experienced editors, which is certainly something I would be glad to do. -- ] (], ]) 21:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 08:51, 13 June 2024
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Ludwigs2 has not edited Misplaced Pages since 9 March 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Archives |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |