Misplaced Pages

User talk:Squiddy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:25, 16 February 2006 editQuarl (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators32,378 edits WP:RFA/Quarl← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:20, 24 November 2020 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,139,932 edits →ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery 
(234 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{| align="right" width="260px"
== Welcome! ==
|__TOC__
'''Welcome!'''
|}


Hello {{PAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out ] or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  --] 03:36, 11 November 2005 (UTC)


== Re: Venn Diagrams ==


Welcome to my talk page!
Hmm, your browser did replace the Chinese and Japanese characters with question marks, but I don't know why your browser would be doing that (if you use IE, you might want to download the language packs at ]). You might want to try posting something to the ]. Feel free to keep editing the page, though you might want to use section editing to avoid that question-mark problem. It's really no big deal. :) --]]] 15:00, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
== Nuggeting ==
* {{On AFD|NUGGET}}
You stated that this article was "nonsense". Please re-visit both the article and the discussion. Please also visit ] and consider adding the article to your watchlist and assisting in the effort to keep the article clear of unverifiable additions and original research by schoolchildren. ] 15:20, 21 November 2005 (UTC)


* If you write to me here, I'll answer here. If I've written on your talk page, I will have put it on my watchlist and will look for replies there.
== Featured article for December 25th ==


* Constructive discussion of articles or subjects I'm involved with is welcome, and I'm happy to debate the merits of any of my edits.
I noticed that you have listed yourself as an atheist Wikipedian. You will probably be interested to know that ] has nominated ] as the front page article for ]. You can vote on this matter
]. The other suggestion being supported by others for that date is ], although ] has historically been against featuring articles on the same day as their anniversary/holiday. ] <sup>] ]</sup> 08:20, 28 November 2005 (UTC)


* If you've been vandalizing articles, but still want to come here to whine about being reverted... well, you're welcome, but I'll just tell you where to go. ] | ] 09:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
== Hey, check out the talk page ==


==Holocaust denial==
squiddy, just wanted you to read this,
http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Jerry_Cain


Hello, I believe that this article is misleading and does not adhere to an academical standard. Especially the heavy bias in favor of the political pressure group ADL does not help to get an adequate description.
== ] page ==
Please consider these data:


:( ] | ] 11:52, 22 October 2011 (UTC))
See ] again. ] 07:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC)


==Recent edits on ]==
==Treblinka==
Hello, if the deleted content breaches with ] then surely it can be justified to delete it without consensus, or am I wrong?
Very well said on the talk page. Thanks for the well-referenced intervention. --] 21:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)


:No, because NPOV is hashed out on the discussion page. In this case you, a relatively inexperienced editor, are in a minority of one, and various long-term editors are opposed to your deletion. Repeatedly deleting counts as edit-warring, which is disruptive, and will not effect the change you wish to see. If you persist you are likely to be blocked. ] | ] 23:35, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
== ] ==
::The time I and the opposing members have spend on wikipedia, seems more or less irrelevant to the fact that the sentence at hand is in violation with ] I would like to rephrase my question into few following questions and get a more exact answer this time: If an item is violating the guidelines of wikipedia, can it then be removed without consensus? If the answer is yes, then surely if I prove the sentence at hand is breaching with ] it can be removed without consensus correct? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:01, 31 July 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::::No, because NPOV is hashed out on the discussion page. I can't think of a simpler way to put it. You need to get a consensus of involved editors that some text is violating policy in order to get it removed. ] | ] 00:24, 31 July 2011 (UTC)


== Your comment about Rasmussen Poll at Public Opinion on Global warming ==
I tried to make the above article into an acceptable stub that actually contains factual information. Take a look and see what you think. ] 18:21, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


Hi Squiddy, Thanks for reverting the graphic. FYI, in the summary for the change you didn't quite nail the poll. You described it as ''"Poll says 69% think it is at least 'somewhat possible' that scientists falsified..., not that 69% think they did"''
== Theodore7 ==


The poll language states:
A number of editors started an RfC against ] ]. I though you might wanted to know. Cheers, ] 16:25, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
'' "69% say it’s at least '''somewhat likely''' that '''some''' scientists have falsified research data"''


I happen to think it's at lease ''somewhat'' likely that most people falsify at least some factoid on their tax returns too. That casts a mighty thin net.
== Articles For Deletion ==


Anyway, I just wanted to suggest reverting your own edit, and then reverting again with the accurate poll text. No biggie if this doesn't stir your crank. Cheers, ] (]) 19:17, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, one or both of the following situations applies to you, and you may therefore be interested in related discussions.
*You expressed an opinion about the proposed deletion of an article concerning one of the first 200 verses of the ]. Would you therefore like to join a centralised discussion about the other 199 articles at ]
*You expressed an opinion about the proposed deletion of an article concerning one of the first 19 verses of the 20th Chapter of the ]. Would you therefore like to join a centralised discussion about the other 18 articles at ]


:Thanks, you're right, I didn't quite express myself accurately. I won't revert and re-revert just for the sake of an edit summary, but if the graphic is re-added I will explain myself further on the talk page. ] | ] 14:51, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
You may also be interested in a discussion of whether or not the entire text of a whole bible chapter should be contained in the 6 articles concerning those specific chapters, and whether or not they should only use the translations favoured by fundamentalists. This is being discussed at ].


== Thank you for your attention to ]. ==
--] | ] 17:55, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


Thank you for your attention to ], the revert of ], and thus increased clarity. (",) ] (]) 01:30, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
== Alan Chartock ==


:No problem. I think it's an inappropriate use of the hatnote, and I've given reasons on the talk page. ] | ] 14:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
If I provide the full URL, would that be ok? ] 13:38, 20 January 2006 (UTC)


== A barnstar for you! ==
:Hello, Zach. The problem is that the text which was taken from the other site is automatically copyright of the site owner/writer unless it has been put in the public domain. (See ] for Wiki policy and stuff about copyright.)


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
:If you re-wrote the article using the data from the website, but using your own words, that would not have a copyright problem. There is a red link to do this at a temporary page on the copyvio banner on ]. Hope this helps. --] | ] 14:34, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For your scrutiny of articles and edits for the betterment of Misplaced Pages, I award you this barnstar. Cheers, ] (]) 15:16, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
|}


== Linking to categories == == ] ==


In real live it is normal that people motivate there actions when they destroy work of others, further more your correction is way out outside the scope of the lemma. Because you are on Misplaced Pages it must be possible that you can read. It is original data I provide. Authentic text from original source. Pure facts. Real data. The way it really was. The how it all got to happen. Maybe Herzl needs to have a paragraph of its own as the inventor of the Final Solution of the Jewish Question. Because that is what he really was. Than you can put the data on an other place and add it with something extra. The text was carefully placed in between the lines. Not prominent placed so everybody can read for itself. Misplaced Pages is a lie now.
I saw your edit summary saying that you could not link to a category. To do this, insert a colon at the start of the link like this: <nowiki>]</nowiki>. This will insert it as a link instead of including the article in the category. --] ] 14:50, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
:Thanks very much. --] | ] 15:17, 21 January 2006 (UTC)


The Final Solution begins with Theodore Herzl. He starts talking about it in public. It his his idea. There was no problem with Jews. The Zionists created problems for the Jews. If you read his diaries you can see that he thinks great of his invention. He is really fund of himself. Can supply you with Quotes from Herzl copy/past from his original Dairies on my desk to become convinced that Misplaced Pages now is less than half the truth.
== New page patrol ==


Zionist leader ], the soul of Zionism, is also in favor of antisemitism, against democracy, against free speech and thankful for slavery. Herzl wrote it all down by himself in his Dairies. And article in the Jewish Chronicle and papers. It also is all written down in the original protocols of the First Zionist Congress at Basel. The Wannsee conference was nothing more than the Zionist program in progress. All hard coded historical facts. The way it all really happened
Hey, try to go easy on the <nowiki>{{nn-bio}}</nowiki> tags. ] was identified as a university Vice-chancellor in his stub. Keep up the good work otherwise! Cheers, ](]) 00:35, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


So pleas re do your unmotivated editing on ]. Misplaced Pages looks like a propaganda machine now. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:24, 19 November 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== ] ==


== Edits to OSIM page ==
I removed your speedy deletion tag from this article. It seems to me as the publisher of the only magazine for ]-related topics, that constitutes a claim of notability. I sent it to ] instead (see ]). Regards, <span style="font-family:Verdana;">''']]]''' <small>{]}</small></span> 18:40, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


I just noticed some messages regarding edits to the OSIM page? Why do you keep removing the clarifications to the OSIM page? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== The Nation ==


== Barnstar ==
The issue of what article should be at this title has been placed on ]. You can offer your vote and comment here: ]. ]<small>&nbsp;]&nbsp;]</small> 06:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}}
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Misplaced Pages and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.
|}


==DeSmogBlog "Deniergate" Controversy==
== UKCOTW ==
{{UKCOTW FYI}}


Dear Squiddy, Please good sir, it would be appreciated if you could kindly desist from deleting my factual additions and references from the ] page. Many thanks in advance in sincere anticipation of your cooperation.
== ] ==


Your Wikicomrade,
Hi Squiddy, thanks for your support in my RFA, which succeeded. If I can ever improve or help in any way, please let me know! :) <span class="user-sig user-Quarl"><i>—] <sup>(])</sup> <small>] 12:25Z</small></i></span>
] (]) 12:22, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

== thanx ==

Thank you to additions to ] relating to ]. Please see ]. ] (]) 03:02, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


==Fossil Fuel Edits===

While I know that the writing was not spectacular, I believe that you are wrong to remove my references to gravity in the fossil fuel edits. The role of gravity in fuel formation is important to understanding its nature. For example both the deveopment periods and the nature of the final materials is dictated by the strength of planetary gravity. As a result "fuels" not based upon plant material are likely to exist on other large planets. Also on other planets with life the fuel development will depend on both plant life viability and planetary gravity. My research into the effects of planetary gravity, as director of applied research for Gravitational systems engineering, has led us to examine the role of gravity in many processes, including fuel development.

Thanks

Gare Henderson <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:I don't agree, I'm afraid. The previous wording using 'heavy' seems adequate. 'Heavy' implies 'weight' = product of mass and gravity. I don't think it needs to be made more explicit than that. ] | ] 06:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

== The Great Global Warming Swindle ==

please clarify how should I "source" my editing! is it really important to give the exact timestamp where this phrase is told? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:It needs to have been picked up be ] ] to show its importance - that way it isn't just up to random editors to pick out bits they like. ] | ] 05:30, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi! Publication is the main activity of nowdays science. (Sorry, but I cannot give sources to this, it is quite evident. Do you really need sources to see this?) And there is not even a single word in this section about this, but only about less scientific questions. I quotet the opinion on possibility of publication because this is much more important for a scientist, than death threats!

(By the way, is it possible to move this talk to the talk of the article? I am not familiar wuith wikipedia editing -- sorry!)] (]) 07:54, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

== Proposal to include David North as Key Trotskyist ==

Could you take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/Template_talk:Trotskyism#Proposal_to_include_David_North_as_Key_Trotskyist ? Thanks! --] (]) 11:54, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice -->

== ] ==

Thank you for your attention to ]. ] (]) 01:02, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
:Note that this IP is a blocked sock of a blocked IP. You're welcome to retain the edit on your talk page if you want to, but he had no right to add it. — ] ] 07:12, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
::I think it's extremely rude of you to delete a friendly comment on a user talk page that has nothing to do with you. Please do not edit my talk page again, in any way, for any reason. ] | ] 07:26, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
:::On the contrary; there is no right for a blocked editor to make a comment, friendly or otherwise. I will stop editing your talk page ''except'' for required notices, reverting the actions of blocked editors, and any BLP or copyright violations that I notice. — ] ] 07:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

== Next meetups in North England ==

Hello. Would you be interested in attending one of the next wikimeets in the north of England? They will take place in:
* Leeds on ]
* Manchester on ]
* Liverpool on ]
If you can make them, please sign up on the relevant wikimeet page!

If you want to receive future notifications about these wikimeets, then please add your name to ] (or remove it if you're already on the list and you don't want to receive future notifications!)

Thanks. ] (]) 22:36, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

== ]: Voting now open! ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Squiddy. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/11&oldid=750554570 -->

== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Squiddy. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/10&oldid=813413927 -->

== Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed ==

Hello '''Squiddy'''! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to ] may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the ]. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at ]. Thank you! <span style="font-family:sans-serif">&mdash; <span style="font-weight:bold">] <sup>]</sup></span></span> 20:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=990307860 -->

Latest revision as of 01:20, 24 November 2020

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5


Welcome to my talk page!

  • If you write to me here, I'll answer here. If I've written on your talk page, I will have put it on my watchlist and will look for replies there.
  • Constructive discussion of articles or subjects I'm involved with is welcome, and I'm happy to debate the merits of any of my edits.

Holocaust denial

Hello, I believe that this article is misleading and does not adhere to an academical standard. Especially the heavy bias in favor of the political pressure group ADL does not help to get an adequate description. Please consider these data:

( Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 11:52, 22 October 2011 (UTC))

Recent edits on Holocaust Denial

Hello, if the deleted content breaches with NPOV then surely it can be justified to delete it without consensus, or am I wrong?

No, because NPOV is hashed out on the discussion page. In this case you, a relatively inexperienced editor, are in a minority of one, and various long-term editors are opposed to your deletion. Repeatedly deleting counts as edit-warring, which is disruptive, and will not effect the change you wish to see. If you persist you are likely to be blocked. Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 23:35, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
The time I and the opposing members have spend on wikipedia, seems more or less irrelevant to the fact that the sentence at hand is in violation with NPOV I would like to rephrase my question into few following questions and get a more exact answer this time: If an item is violating the guidelines of wikipedia, can it then be removed without consensus? If the answer is yes, then surely if I prove the sentence at hand is breaching with NPOV it can be removed without consensus correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Averagejoedev (talk • contribs) 00:01, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
No, because NPOV is hashed out on the discussion page. I can't think of a simpler way to put it. You need to get a consensus of involved editors that some text is violating policy in order to get it removed. Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 00:24, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Your comment about Rasmussen Poll at Public Opinion on Global warming

Hi Squiddy, Thanks for reverting the graphic. FYI, in the summary for the change you didn't quite nail the poll. You described it as "Poll says 69% think it is at least 'somewhat possible' that scientists falsified..., not that 69% think they did"

The poll language states: "69% say it’s at least somewhat likely that some scientists have falsified research data"

I happen to think it's at lease somewhat likely that most people falsify at least some factoid on their tax returns too. That casts a mighty thin net.

Anyway, I just wanted to suggest reverting your own edit, and then reverting again with the accurate poll text. No biggie if this doesn't stir your crank. Cheers, NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:17, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, you're right, I didn't quite express myself accurately. I won't revert and re-revert just for the sake of an edit summary, but if the graphic is re-added I will explain myself further on the talk page. Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 14:51, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your attention to Climate change denial.

Thank you for your attention to Climate change denial, the revert of Special:Contributions/Arthur_Rubin, and thus increased clarity. (",) 99.181.141.119 (talk) 01:30, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

No problem. I think it's an inappropriate use of the hatnote, and I've given reasons on the talk page. Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 14:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
For your scrutiny of articles and edits for the betterment of Misplaced Pages, I award you this barnstar. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 15:16, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Final_Solution

In real live it is normal that people motivate there actions when they destroy work of others, further more your correction is way out outside the scope of the lemma. Because you are on Misplaced Pages it must be possible that you can read. It is original data I provide. Authentic text from original source. Pure facts. Real data. The way it really was. The how it all got to happen. Maybe Herzl needs to have a paragraph of its own as the inventor of the Final Solution of the Jewish Question. Because that is what he really was. Than you can put the data on an other place and add it with something extra. The text was carefully placed in between the lines. Not prominent placed so everybody can read for itself. Misplaced Pages is a lie now.

The Final Solution begins with Theodore Herzl. He starts talking about it in public. It his his idea. There was no problem with Jews. The Zionists created problems for the Jews. If you read his diaries you can see that he thinks great of his invention. He is really fund of himself. Can supply you with Quotes from Herzl copy/past from his original Dairies on my desk to become convinced that Misplaced Pages now is less than half the truth.

Zionist leader Theodore Herzl, the soul of Zionism, is also in favor of antisemitism, against democracy, against free speech and thankful for slavery. Herzl wrote it all down by himself in his Dairies. And article in the Jewish Chronicle and papers. It also is all written down in the original protocols of the First Zionist Congress at Basel. The Wannsee conference was nothing more than the Zionist program in progress. All hard coded historical facts. The way it all really happened

So pleas re do your unmotivated editing on Final_Solution. Misplaced Pages looks like a propaganda machine now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roetschild (talk • contribs) 17:24, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Edits to OSIM page

I just noticed some messages regarding edits to the OSIM page? Why do you keep removing the clarifications to the OSIM page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthsayer20 (talk • contribs) 04:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Misplaced Pages and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

DeSmogBlog "Deniergate" Controversy

Dear Squiddy, Please good sir, it would be appreciated if you could kindly desist from deleting my factual additions and references from the DeSmogBlog page. Many thanks in advance in sincere anticipation of your cooperation.

Your Wikicomrade, Shambala2011 (talk) 12:22, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

thanx

Thank you to additions to The Heartland Institute relating to Climate change policy of the United States. Please see wp:Tea. 108.73.113.5 (talk) 03:02, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


Fossil Fuel Edits=

While I know that the writing was not spectacular, I believe that you are wrong to remove my references to gravity in the fossil fuel edits. The role of gravity in fuel formation is important to understanding its nature. For example both the deveopment periods and the nature of the final materials is dictated by the strength of planetary gravity. As a result "fuels" not based upon plant material are likely to exist on other large planets. Also on other planets with life the fuel development will depend on both plant life viability and planetary gravity. My research into the effects of planetary gravity, as director of applied research for Gravitational systems engineering, has led us to examine the role of gravity in many processes, including fuel development.

Thanks

Gare Henderson — Preceding unsigned comment added by GareHenderson (talk • contribs) 05:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

I don't agree, I'm afraid. The previous wording using 'heavy' seems adequate. 'Heavy' implies 'weight' = product of mass and gravity. I don't think it needs to be made more explicit than that. Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 06:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

The Great Global Warming Swindle

please clarify how should I "source" my editing! is it really important to give the exact timestamp where this phrase is told? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.0.154.203 (talk) 22:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

It needs to have been picked up be reliable secondary sources to show its importance - that way it isn't just up to random editors to pick out bits they like. Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 05:30, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi! Publication is the main activity of nowdays science. (Sorry, but I cannot give sources to this, it is quite evident. Do you really need sources to see this?) And there is not even a single word in this section about this, but only about less scientific questions. I quotet the opinion on possibility of publication because this is much more important for a scientist, than death threats!

(By the way, is it possible to move this talk to the talk of the article? I am not familiar wuith wikipedia editing -- sorry!)84.0.154.203 (talk) 07:54, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposal to include David North as Key Trotskyist

Could you take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/Template_talk:Trotskyism#Proposal_to_include_David_North_as_Key_Trotskyist ? Thanks! --Duncan (talk) 11:54, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Money as Debt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Money as Debt is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Money as Debt (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Misplaced Pages:A nice cup of tea and a sit down

Thank you for your attention to atmospheric methane. 99.119.131.38 (talk) 01:02, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Note that this IP is a blocked sock of a blocked IP. You're welcome to retain the edit on your talk page if you want to, but he had no right to add it. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:12, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
I think it's extremely rude of you to delete a friendly comment on a user talk page that has nothing to do with you. Please do not edit my talk page again, in any way, for any reason. Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 07:26, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
On the contrary; there is no right for a blocked editor to make a comment, friendly or otherwise. I will stop editing your talk page except for required notices, reverting the actions of blocked editors, and any BLP or copyright violations that I notice. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Next meetups in North England

Hello. Would you be interested in attending one of the next wikimeets in the north of England? They will take place in:

If you can make them, please sign up on the relevant wikimeet page!

If you want to receive future notifications about these wikimeets, then please add your name to the notification list (or remove it if you're already on the list and you don't want to receive future notifications!)

Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:36, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Squiddy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Squiddy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Squiddy! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II 20:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)