| Revision as of 08:17, 10 December 2010 editTothwolf (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,326 edits →theserialcomma: Offering an olive branch← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:01, 5 June 2024 edit undoJonesey95 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Template editors374,123 edits Notification: listing of Template:Template title at WP:Templates for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (1,000 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Not around|3=16 November 2020}} | |||
| <div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;></div> | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 8 | ||
| |archive = User talk:Amalthea/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Amalthea/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| |algo = old(14d) | |algo = old(14d) | ||
| Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
| }}{{/Header}} | }}{{/Header}} | ||
| == Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| == Hug bug == | |||
| Hiya. Last month you did a great Twinkle fix, to add (talk) - in red or blue - when TW was used to revert an edit. | |||
| ] | |||
| (You fixed it with .) | |||
| Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. | |||
| Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
| Well, I was wondering if your silky skills extended to Huggle as well? | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] 00:07, 1 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
| Note that don't show the (talk) suffix. | |||
| == Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| Regards, ] (]) 10:24, 18 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : Huggle doesn't because the talk link was {{diff2|396510368|removed from its config}} a couple of days ago.<br>Can't tell you why, I don't find the discussion hinted at in the edit summary. Feel free to initiate one at ]. ] 10:53, 18 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for that info. - I'll pursue it, using your leads. (Twinkle 1, Huggle 0!) Regards, ] (]) 10:58, 18 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| FYI: I thought I'd start by asking the editor, at ] - in case you wanted to track any developments. ] (]) 11:09, 18 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days. | |||
| : Was reverted now anyway. ] 22:48, 18 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
| Ooh yes - ta for pointing that out. I'll sit tight for now, in that case. ] (]) 00:15, 19 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] 00:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
| OK then - next up: ]. It doesn't show the (talk) currently . Any ideas? Ta, ] (]) 10:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : ]. Talk to ]. ] 12:37, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| Right - will do - ta. ] (]) 16:49, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed. | |||
| Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at ]. | |||
| == Easyblock == | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 00:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Amalthea - I see you've been the most recent updater of Easyblock.js. Do you know if the original author has stopped adding to it, or just busy IRL? I left a note requesting an enhancement (removal of categories like username concern when blocking) which went unanswered. Now I was going to go back with nother suggestion (to add causeblock to the username blocking reasons) but I see that Animum doesn't edit much any more. Should I take a stab at it myself? Are you versed enough in the script that you could add either of them? Should I just shut up and do causeblocks manually (as I do now)? All suggestions appreciated. Thanks. ] 07:24, 19 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : What's a causeblock? Usename blocks are by and large unnecessary and/or excessive, in my opinion, so I don't know the first thing about it.<br>Animum would certainly not mind any extensions to the script if such extensions are generally useful, so if you want just go for it. I can try as well, but I can't promise having time for it before Christmas. :\<br>] 11:55, 21 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::I made the change myself. Seems to work fine, but feel free to revert if you see any problems. Thanks. ] 08:56, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Looks great. And now people will come to you if they want further additions. :) ] 09:30, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::: {{=)|surprise}} ] 23:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::If you have a look at it, could you check the syntax as well? The new Firefox JS engine (]) does not seem to like it and I cannot get it to work properly. The error console says | |||
| <pre>Error: UrlParameters is not defined | |||
| Source File: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Animum/easyblock.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript | |||
| Line: 491</pre> | |||
| ::but I have no idea as to why that is. Regards ''']]''' 12:46, 21 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Try it now (after ]). ] 11:03, 22 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Well, no error messages anymore and it seems to work! Thanks! :-) | |||
| ::::Btw, on a similar problem, I get the following error in the error console: | |||
| <pre>Error: QueryString is not defined | |||
| Source File: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Ioeth/friendlytag.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript | |||
| Line: 46</pre> | |||
| ::::Since you are also familiar with Twinkle/Friendly, could you have a look at this as well? Regards ''']]''' 11:58, 22 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: Can you try now, again ]? Only touched friendlytag, the others might need the same treatment. And sorry for offloading testing to you, most of the extensions I use don't work with Firefox 4.0 yet. :)<br>Cheers, ] 15:18, 22 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::The welcoming seems to work but I still get the following errors in the console: | |||
| <pre>Error: twAddPortletLink is not defined | |||
| Source File: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Ioeth/friendlytalkback.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript | |||
| Line: 48 | |||
| Error: QueryString is not defined | |||
| Source File: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Ioeth/friendlytag.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript | |||
| Line: 46</pre> | |||
| ::::::Don't worry about offloading though, I'm more than happy to help with that :-) Regards ''']]''' 09:27, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| == September done, now october == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 02:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Always precious == | |||
| Thanks for doing September. I have just archived October so when you have the time could you do October? Cheers. ] (]) 14:34, 29 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| : Done. Cheers, ] 16:12, 29 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Ten years ago, ] were found precious. That's what you are, always, - you will be remembered --] (]) 07:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Rani Maria Vattalil.jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thinking about our weather, especially as it started in November. Here come's the snow again, falling on my head like a memory, falling on my head like a new emotion.... ] (]) | |||
| == User:Amalthea/culoghelper.js == | |||
| == Twinkle misfire == | |||
| Hi Amalthea and any ], | |||
| Hello, I apologize for mistakenly using Twinkle to undo your edits to ]. I was looking at the Twinkle functions and clicked by accident. I think I have rectified the problem and restored your edits to the page, but could you double check? Sorry once again. ] (]) 01:46, 3 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : No worries, happens. :) ] 09:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I've made a patch to add ] into the CheckUser extension. Most of it is re-written into PHP, but it uses the concepts and a small part of the JavaScript (the bit that auto-scrolls down to the highlighted entry). It's at {{phab|T309925}}. | |||
| == Skoojal SPI == | |||
| If this is added into the extension the user script will probably collide with the userscript, so perhaps it can be emptied once the patch has been added? | |||
| You worked on a recent SPI that turned out to be Skoojal. I've just posted a new SPI for Skoojal himself. ], in case you have any insight or recollection of the details. <b>] ] </b> 07:37, 4 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Never mind. I contacted the user and am satisfied that it is a different person. <b>] ] </b> 09:51, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :: Alright. :) ] 09:53, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for the great userscript, ] <sup>'']'' | '']''</sup> 01:34, 5 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :This script has been added to the extension so within the next week it should be out for people to use. I'm not sure how it will collide with the extension, but I suspect a userscript trying to add a link around a link won't help so perhaps the script can be blanked once the next update has reached enwiki (should be Thursday next week). I'll make a request at the interface admin noticeboard once it arrives. Hopefully people like this and it works as well as the old script did :). ] <sup>'']'' | '']''</sup> 00:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| The IP is at it again, slow moving this time.--] (]) 12:27, 4 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : Protected, and left a comment at the talk page. ] 10:55, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Bot Inactivation == | ||
| Hello, per ] your bot has not met the activity requirements and will be de-flagged unless we hear from you before 10 January 2024. If you wish to continue operating your bot please indicate so; the discussion is at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Bots/Noticeboard#Inactive_bots}}. ] (]) 13:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I have reblocked this account for harassment. Please contact me via email if you have any questions about this. ] <sup>]</sup> 12:31, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| : No questions, harassment is a different issue, one that I deliberately left open. Abuse of multiple accounts I still don't see (despite his insinuations/threats). ] 13:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – ] (]) 19:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :: He has clearly stated himself that he has created a sockpuppet after his main account was blocked . - ] ] 17:30, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Loads of folks make such boasts without coming through, and with multiple CUs having looked into it it's a rather useless tag, but suit yourself. Just make sure you never claim that he actually ''has'' abused multiple accounts since that might be a libelous claim (depending on where you live, probably, but IANAL). ] 18:24, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Agree. Burpleson, the user has been indeffed. There is nothing else to do here. ] <sup>]</sup> 18:28, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == hello == | |||
| hellooooooooooooo, <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == theserialcomma == | |||
| i scrambled the passwords long ago so i am posting under this account because i have no other option. it's not like i'd post under my real IP, and I can't access my old account, so the only way to defend myself is to make a new account. i'm not posting to wikipedia articles or anything, just doing this to defend myself. if this is technically abusive sockpuppetry or block evading, so be it, but i did this because i object to jehochman's latest block of me without providing any evidence. i never socked, and i didnt return to harass anyone. whether i am unblocked or kept indef'd is not important to me at this point, but i would hope that you ask jehochman for his evidence of my 'continued' harassment. there is none. i would request some diffs or evidence because there isnt any. the sockpuppetry block was incorrect, and the continued harassment block was incorrect. this has led me to making a new account since i scrambled the passwords, leaving me in this situation where now i've technically evaded a block. nice. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 10:22, December 7, 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| :I have blocked this account as a self-confessed sockpuppet and reverted the changes it made to ], as these deleted/modified other editors' comments and talk page access had at any rate been revoked. Feel free to revert my actions if you deem them to harsh. ] (]) 10:31, 7 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :TSC, if you'd like to edit again, you have to completely avoid any interaction or mention of a certain editor you've been in long term conflict with. You must not make edits that need to be ], as you did on November 27. Finally, you must not make any derogatory remarks relating to any user's sexual orientation. If you agree to these terms, contact me or Amalthea, or the Arbitration Committee and you might be authorized to create a fresh account. These are the terms I suggest for discussion. ] <sup>]</sup> 15:55, 7 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Theserialcomma, I think Jehochman is being very generous given the personal attack you made towards him on your talk page. <small>(Note that he ] IRC.)</small> After seeing his offer here, I feel I should offer an olive branch myself. It should be possible for you to recover your ] account, and I suspect either Jehochman or Amalthea can advise you on how to go about it.<p>I am willing to forgive and forget both the on-wiki and off-wiki stuff related to our conflict. There are however a few things I would like to see from you in order to help put the past behind us and minimise the chance of any further conflicts.<p>First, I would like to see you acknowledge and offer an on-wiki apology for you role and actions related to the events that have transpired thus far. You don't need to go into the details of each event, I would just like to see you acknowledge your role in the larger conflict. I'm not asking you to take responsibility for the actions of the other two individuals who later became involved, but just your own role.<p>Second, I would like for you to voluntarily agree to avoid editing in the subject areas that I normally edit in as you didn't previously edit in those subject areas anyway (technology/computing/online communications, including IRC, etc). In exchange, I'll cull my own watchlist and remove articles in the subject areas you tended to edit in.<p>I want you to understand that I don't really have any say-so over any actions resulting from any discussion on the functionaries list. Whatever they decide to do with the material I submitted is pretty much out of my hands at this point. If other editors also decide a community discussion is necessary regarding your past actions before unblocking you, that is also out of my hands.<p>I also reserve the right to at some point create a subpage in my userspace (as other editors have done when they've been involved in past conflicts) which details our conflict, including the good, the bad, and and ugly, so that the community can both learn from and better understand what happened.<p>It has become quite apparent in the last month or so that you've made ''a lot'' of enemies here on Misplaced Pages who ''really'' don't like you. Going forward, I would really like to avoid us being enemies.<p>I also wish to apologise for my actions in . As frustrated as I was, that still isn't an excuse. It was inappropriate for me to respond to you in that manner and I shouldn't have done it. --] (]) 08:17, 10 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Asgardian sock investigation== | |||
| Hi. I started ] into Asgardian's socks. I don't know why the ones from and closed without any apparent resolution or finding, but one of the IPs named during that one is one of the three I've named in this newest one. Someone on that page mentioned that a CU could look that investigation over and forward it to arbcom, but I don't know exactly what that means, whether it was done, and what, if any effect that had. Can you advise on how this works? One of the IPs in this newest investigation is one of the IPs mentioned in those earlier investigations. Thanks. ] (]) 19:15, 7 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : Sent you a mail. Cheers, ] 15:18, 9 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::If a user has been banned, than any and all IPs he uses to edit from should be blocked, regardless of any assessments of "harm" caused by his edits. He is continuing his WP:OWN-type behavior, and his uncivil remarks to others. That others may edit from those IPs is irrelevant; others can simply sign in for their own accounts. The attitude that there's nothing that can be done to stop him is what allowed him to violate the site's policies for three years before he was banned and now, the same fatalistic resignation is allowing him to continue. ] (]) 18:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Deleting Contributions == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| I've posted some information that has been reverted, and I'd like the contribution history to be deleted. I was wondering if it would be possible for you to help with this. I regret what I wrote, as I was disgruntled, and the former employer has asked for the information to be removed from the history. I'd appreciate your help. | |||
| Thank you. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 13:27, 9 December 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| : Has already been taken care of. Cheers, ] 14:26, 9 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:01, 5 June 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Amalthea has not edited Misplaced Pages since 16 November 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
 | Hello, and welcome to my talk page.
⇒ Start a new Talk topic. |
| Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:07, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux 00:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Blacklisted link inline
Template:Blacklisted link inline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always, - you will be remembered --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Rani Maria Vattalil.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rani Maria Vattalil.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
User:Amalthea/culoghelper.js
Hi Amalthea and any talk page stalkers,
I've made a patch to add User:Amalthea/culoghelper.js into the CheckUser extension. Most of it is re-written into PHP, but it uses the concepts and a small part of the JavaScript (the bit that auto-scrolls down to the highlighted entry). It's at T309925.
If this is added into the extension the user script will probably collide with the userscript, so perhaps it can be emptied once the patch has been added?
Thanks for the great userscript, Dreamy Jazz 01:34, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- This script has been added to the extension so within the next week it should be out for people to use. I'm not sure how it will collide with the extension, but I suspect a userscript trying to add a link around a link won't help so perhaps the script can be blanked once the next update has reached enwiki (should be Thursday next week). I'll make a request at the interface admin noticeboard once it arrives. Hopefully people like this and it works as well as the old script did :). Dreamy Jazz 00:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Bot Inactivation
Hello, per WP:BOTINACTIVE your bot has not met the activity requirements and will be de-flagged unless we hear from you before 10 January 2024. If you wish to continue operating your bot please indicate so; the discussion is at Misplaced Pages:Bots/Noticeboard § Inactive bots. Primefac (talk) 13:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Template title
Template:Template title has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)