Revision as of 22:28, 26 December 2010 view sourceGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Re: Lock article: new section← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 21:31, 11 January 2025 view source ClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,381,683 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2025/January. (BOT)Tag: Manual revert |
(742 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
<div style="text-align: center;">]</div> |
|
<div style="text-align: center;">]</div> |
|
|
|
|
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis |
|
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis |
|
|archiveprefix=User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/ |
|
|archiveprefix=User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/ |
Line 9: |
Line 8: |
|
|box-advert=yes |
|
|box-advert=yes |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
== Can you add Bolivia? == |
|
|
Can you add Bolivia to map of states that recognize Palestine? per http://maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=342977 ? ] (]) 16:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
:Will take care of it now. --] (]) 16:35, 17 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thanks! -] (]) 04:36, 20 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== East Jerusalem Map == |
|
|
Do you know if there is a Map for East Jerusalem available to use? Per the ] article, it would be more accurate than showing the location within ]. -] (]) 15:13, 20 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Please do not == |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot edit like . If you'd like the comment be in the other section, it is OK, but please move versus remove it.--] (]) 17:49, 20 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== FYI == |
|
|
Since I still am confused about this process I thought I would bring this to your attention. It looks like they are trying to bring up a point here, I don't know if it is relevant to your AE case you started related to Cheesdovi. See ]. -] (]) 19:48, 20 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Re: You are involved == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Supreme Deliciousness! I do not feel that I am in any way involved in the dispute between yourself, Chesdovi and Pantherskin, and don't understand how our past interactions are related to the incident in question. If you feel otherwise, please raise the issue in the relevant case. —] <sup>(])</sup> 22:12, 21 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Pls direct me... == |
|
|
|
|
|
..to the "consensus" page used to add you most recent line at ]. Thnaks. ] (]) 12:39, 22 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== AE == |
|
|
|
|
|
--] (]) 03:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Please do not out me == |
|
|
|
|
|
You are free to send personal information about me to an admin through mail but I don't want you revealing personal information about me publicly. --] (]) 10:59, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
:]! But OK I will not re-post the info although it was not outing. You admitted using that IP yourself. And discussing you using other account is not outing. Please do not remove this information. --] (]) 12:14, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== A topic related to you is under discussion ... == |
|
|
|
|
|
... I don't know the right boilerplate, but you are mentioned . ] (]) 18:06, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Names == |
|
|
|
|
|
If the name of the old account is a problem you can request that it be renamed at ].--] 08:16, 24 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Re: Lock article == |
|
|
|
|
|
Re : Done for a short while at least, though not likely to be very effective. -- ] (]) 22:28, 26 December 2010 (UTC) |
|