Misplaced Pages

1996 United States campaign finance controversy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:29, 21 February 2006 editJayzel68 (talk | contribs)3,506 edits remove "industrial complex" for style and to end argument. Was not important anyway← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:49, 7 December 2024 edit undoDimadick (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers804,734 edits External links: Category:1996 United States presidential election 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Chinese lobbying controversy in the United States}}
]
{{pp-move}}
The '''1996 United States campaign finance scandal''', also known as '''Chinagate''', refers to alleged efforts by the ] to influence domestic ] politics prior to and during the ] as well as the fundraising practices of the administration itself.
<!-- FAIR USE of Gore-hsia.jpg: see image description page at http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Gore-hsia.jpg for rationale -->
<!-- FAIR USE of Clinton-chung.jpg: see image description page at http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Clinton-chung.jpg for rationale -->
{{Redirect-distinguish-text|Chinagate|things called "]"}}
{{Use American English|date=January 2019}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2019}}


The '''1996 United States campaign finance controversy''', sometimes referred to as '''Chinagate''', was an effort by the ] to influence domestic ] prior to and during the ] and also involved the ] practices of the administration itself.
While questions regarding the American ]'s fundraising activities first arose in October 1996, China's alleged role in the affair first gained public attention after ] and Brian Duffy of the ] published a story stating that a ] investigation into the fund-raising activities had discovered evidence that agents of China sought to direct contributions from foreign sources to the ] (DNC) before the 1996 presidential campaign.


While questions regarding the ]'s fundraising activities first arose over a '']'' article published on September 21, 1996,<ref name=firstquestions>Miller, Alan C., {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120912133605/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/16703606.html?dids=16703606:16703606&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Sep+21,+1996&author=ALAN+C.+MILLER&pub=Los+Angeles+Times+(pre-1997+Fulltext)&edition=&startpage=16&desc=Democrats+Return+Illegal+Contribution |date=September 12, 2012 }}, ''Los Angeles Times'', September 21, 1996</ref> China's role in the affair first gained public attention when ] and Brian Duffy of '']'' published a story stating that a ] investigation into the fundraising activities had uncovered evidence that agents of China sought to direct contributions from foreign sources to the ] (DNC) before the ]. The journalists wrote that intelligence information had shown the ] in ] was used for coordinating contributions to the DNC<ref name=embassy>Woodward, Bob and Duffy, Brian, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180818052223/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/china1.htm |date=August 18, 2018 }}, ''The Washington Post'', February 13, 1997</ref> in violation of ] forbidding non-] or non-] from giving monetary donations to United States politicians and political parties. A ] investigator of the controversy stated that the Chinese plan targeted both presidential and congressional United States elections, while Democratic senators said the evidence showed the Chinese targeted only congressional elections. The ] denied all accusations.
The journalists wrote that intelligence information had showed the Chinese Embassy in ] was used for coordinating contributions to the DNC<ref name=embassy>Woodward, Bob and Duffy, Brian, , Washington Post, ], ]
</ref> in violation of U.S. law forbidding non-American citizens from giving monetary donations to U.S. politicians and political parties. The Chinese government denied the accusations.


== Background ==
Seventeen people were eventually convicted for fraud or for funneling Asian funds into the U.S. elections. A number of the convictions came against long-time Clinton-Gore friends and political appointees.
{{wikisource|1997 Special Investigation in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns}}


According to the ] report, Chinese officials eventually developed a set of proposals to promote their interests with the United States government and to improve China's image with the American people. The proposals, dubbed the "China Plan", were prompted by the United States Congress's successful lobbying of President ] to grant a visa to ] ]. ] ] had previously assured his Chinese counterpart ] ] that granting a visa would be "inconsistent with unofficial relationship "<ref name=christopher>Ross, Robert S., {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060226161438/http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~johnston/GOV2880/ross3.pdf |date=2006-02-26 }}, '']'', 25:2, pp. 87–123, Fall 2000, Retrieved: April 14, 2006 (PDF file)</ref> and the Clinton Administration's acquiescence to the Congressional resolutions led China to conclude that the influence of Congress over foreign policy was more significant than it had previously determined. When formulating the so-called plan, Chinese officials acknowledged that, compared to other countries, it had little knowledge of, or influence over, policy decisions made in Congress, which had a sizeable pro-Taiwan faction under the influence of a more established "]" run by the ].<ref name="MinSenCommGovAff98">Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1998). "Volume 4 of 6, Minority Views of Senators Glenn, Levin, Lieberman, Akaka, Durbin, Torricelli, and Cleland, Part 1. Foreign Influence, Chapter 2, The China Plan" in ''Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Final Report'' (Senate Report 105-167, March 10, 1998, 105th Congress, 2d Session), see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191113033313/https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/index.html|date=November 13, 2019}}, and {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160309182722/http://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/4-2.htm|date=March 9, 2016}}, accessed 6 October 2015. Note, this is part of the full citation and an alternate web location of the WikiSource, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151007094227/https://en.wikisource.org/1997_Special_Investigation_in_Connection_with_1996_Federal_Election_Campaigns|date=October 7, 2015}}, given above.</ref>{{page needed|date=October 2015}} The plan, according to the Senate report, instructed Chinese officials in the U.S. to improve their knowledge about members of Congress and increase contacts with its members, the public, and the media. The plan also suggested ways to ] United States officials.<ref name= MinSenCommGovAff98/>{{page needed|date=October 2015}}
The campaign finance controversy regained prominence in 1999 with the ]' release of the ], which detailed China's alleged efforts to acquire sensitive American military technology (including, but not limited to, the ] nuclear warhead and ] designs).


Over the years, China repeatedly denied that their lobbying efforts involved financial contributions of any kind, e.g., stating "some people and media in the United States speculated... about so-called participation by Chinese individuals in political donations during the U.S. elections. It is sheer fabrication and is intended to slander China. has never, nor will we ever, use money to influence American politics"—a ] spokesperson, May 1998.<ref name=denial>Pomfret, John, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304222430/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf052098b.htm |date=March 4, 2016 }}, ''The Washington Post'', May 20, 1998</ref>
== "New China Lobby" and the "China Plan" ==


== Major fund-raising figures ==
According to a ] report, prior to 1995, China's approach to promoting its interests in the United States was focused almost exclusively on diplomacy, including summits and meetings with high-level ] officials. In these meetings, China often negotiated with U.S. officials by using the appeal of their huge commercial market<ref name=chinalobby>, U.S. Senate</ref>.
=== Yah-Lin "Charlie" Trie ===
The most significant activity by Yah-Lin "Charlie" Trie (崔亞琳<ref>{{cite book|title=《調查》第28輯: 王健林一語道破天機 習家姐姐財富的流轉|publisher=調查雜誌社|date=2015-11-16|page=|isbn=<!--1681820331 is old-->9781681820330}}</ref>) was a $450,000 attempted donation from him to Clinton's ] (for ]) which Trie allegedly delivered in two envelopes each containing several checks and money orders. The fund immediately rejected $70,000 and deposited the remainder, but ordered an investigation of the source. The investigation found that some of the money orders were made out in different names but with the same handwriting, and sequentially numbered. The fund then rejected the donation entirely, and allegedly returned the deposited funds two months after the initial contribution.<ref name=trie> {{Webarchive|url=https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20170405221009/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/players/trie.htm |date=April 5, 2017 }} Washington Post, March 4, 1998</ref>


Born in Taiwan, Trie emigrated to the U.S. in 1974. He eventually became an ] and co-owner of a restaurant in ]. The 1997 special investigation describes Trie as having attempted to develop an international trading business (Daihatsu International Trading Corporation), having maintained or accessed accounts in Little Rock and Washington, D.C., into which ]-based real estate businessman ] wired >$1M USD from Macau and ], and as having never succeeded in the trading business (based on bank and tax records indicating substantive income only from ]).<ref name="SenCommGovAff98">Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1998). "Summary of Findings" (Chapter 3), "The China Connection: Summary of Committee's Findings Relating to the Effort of the People's Republic of China to Influence U.S. Policies and Elections" (Chapter 18), and "Charlie Trie's Contributions to the Presidential Legal Expense Trust (Chapter 20), in ''Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Final Report'' (Senate Report 105-167, March 10, 1998, 105th Congress, 2d Session), see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191113033313/https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/index.html|date=November 13, 2019}}, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170709225132/https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/1-1.htm|date=July 9, 2017}}, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191012025603/https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/2-18.htm|date=October 12, 2019}}, and {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170709230917/https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/2-20.htm|date=July 9, 2017}}, accessed 6 October 2015. Note, this is the full citation and an alternate web location of the WikiSource, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151007094227/https://en.wikisource.org/1997_Special_Investigation_in_Connection_with_1996_Federal_Election_Campaigns|date=October 7, 2015}}, given above.</ref>{{page needed|date=October 2015}}
U.S. companies were also known to lobby the U.S. government on various issues involving the companies and China. In the 1990s, the news media reported on the phenomenon of U.S. companies lobbying for favorable trade policies regarding China and labelled this activity as the "]". The group consisted of representatives of businesses with trade and investment interests in China (], ], ], et al). In addition, prominent Americans, including several former ], were reported to be involved in promoting increased economic relationships with China, notably ] as well as ], ], ], ], and ]. This "New China Lobby" urged U.S. officials to protect Beijing's trade relationship with the United States because American exports to China were rapidly increasing and creating new American jobs<ref name=lobby>Weeks, Jennifer, , Arms Control Association, June/July 1997</ref><ref name=chinatown>Judis, John B., , ], ], ]</ref>.


In Little Rock, Trie befriended Clinton, then ]. In addition to the attempted donation to Clinton's defense fund, Trie and his immediate family donated $220,000 to the DNC which was also later returned.<ref name= SenCommGovAff98/>{{page needed|date=October 2015}} Immediately after the donation to Clinton's defense fund, Trie sent a letter to President Clinton that expressed concern about America's intervention in tensions arising from China's military exercises being conducted near Taiwan. Trie told the President in his letter that war with China was a possibility should ] continue:
]A U.S. Senate report noted that the country's exports to China grew from $3 billion in 1980 to $38 billion in 1994. Between 1991 and 1996, U.S. exports to China increased by 90.5 percent and the U.S. designated China as one of the top ten "Big Emerging Markets" offering the largest potential for U.S. goods in future years<ref name=markets>Dryfuss, Robert, , ], Vol. 8, Iss. 30</ref>. Total trade between the two countries had risen from $4.8 billion in 1980 to $63.5 billion in 1996, making China the fourth largest U.S. trading partner at the time<ref name=chinalobby>, U.S. Senate</ref>.
{{blockquote|nce the hard parties of the Chinese military incline to grasp U.S. involvement as foreign intervention, is {{sic}} U.S. ready to face such challenge... t is highly possible for China to launch real war based on its past behavior in {{sic}} ] and ] with Russia. (Charlie Trie, letter to President Clinton, March 21, 1996)."<ref name= SenCommGovAff98/>{{page needed|date=October 2015}} }}


After Congressional investigations turned to Trie in late 1996, he left the country for China.<ref name= SenCommGovAff98/>{{page needed|date=October 2015}} Trie returned to the U.S. in 1998 and was convicted and sentenced to three years' probation and four months' home detention for violating federal campaign finance laws by making political contributions in someone else's name and for causing a false statement to be made to the ] (FEC).<ref name=guiltyplea>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/05/21/trie/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060805092557/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/05/21/trie/|title=Fund-raiser Charlie Trie pleads guilty under plea agreement|publisher=CNN|date=May 21, 1999|archive-date=August 5, 2006}}</ref>
With this information in mind, some critics questioned whether China should still be seen as a geopolitical rival of the United States. One explanation, according to the Senate report, was the American public's negative attitude toward China's human rights record, still marked by the Chinese government's suppression of democratic movements (most notably the crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in ] in 1989). Another reason, from the Chinese government's perspective, according to the report, was that "the coming to power of a China-bashing U.S. Congress (was) perceived as part of an increas(ed) anti-Chinese atmosphere in Washington." According to the Senate Committee, information discovered during its investigation supported the conclusion that the Chinese government, beginning in 1994, was concerned that decisions by Congress, including ] toward the ], would harm Chinese interests<ref name=chinalobby>, U.S. Senate</ref>.


=== Johnny Chung ===
] of China and Bill Clinton of the U.S.]]
Born in Taiwan, ] went from being the owner of a ] business (an automated system that quickly sends out ]es to thousands of businesses) in ] to being in the middle of the Washington, D.C. elite within a couple weeks of his first donations to the Democratic Party. Called a "hustler" by a ] (NSC) aide,<ref name=chung>Jackson, David and Sun, Lena H., {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170818222136/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/liu052498.htm |date=August 18, 2017 }}, ''The Washington Post'', May 24, 1998</ref> Chung made forty-nine separate visits to the White House between February 1994 and February 1996.<ref name=chung1>{{cite web|last=Isikoff|first=Michael|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2004/02/08/cash-and-kerry.html|title=Cash and Kerry|work=Newsweek|date=February 9, 2004|access-date=October 7, 2011|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130204152534/http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2004/02/08/cash-and-kerry.html|archive-date=February 4, 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> One of his purposes in making these trips was to obtain photographs of himself with the Clintons, which he believed would help him to get business in China by giving people the impression that he had connections and influence in Washington—he used a brochure that included at least ten photographs of himself with Hillary Clinton along with a personal note from her.<ref>{{cite news|last=Bunting|first=Glenn F.|author2=Alan C. Miller|author3=Rich Connell|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1996-11-28-mn-3722-story.html|title=Donor Enjoyed Broad Access to White House|work=Los Angeles Times|date=November 28, 1996|access-date=October 7, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120309193544/http://articles.latimes.com/1996-11-28/news/mn-3722_1_white-house-tours|archive-date=March 9, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> During one of the ] trade missions to China, Chung befriended former Chinese Lt. Col. ], then an executive at ] (中國航天國際控股有限公司), which is the Hong Kong-based subsidiary of the government-controlled ] (中國航天科技集團公司), China's premier satellite launching company. She is the daughter of former General ].
In early 1995, Taiwanese President ] requested a visa to enter the United States to attend events associated with his college reunion at ] scheduled to be held in June 1995. By March of that year, Congress passed a resolution calling for the president to grant a visa to President Lee and ] subsequently agreed to grant it. China immediately protested the decision and, working through traditional diplomatic channels, suspended ongoing treaty negotiations and recalled its ambassador to the United States<ref name=chinalobby>, U.S. Senate</ref>.


Between 1994 and 1996, Chung donated $366,000 to the DNC. Once the truth of this situation was revealed to the public, all of the money was allegedly returned. Chung told federal investigators that $35,000 of the money he donated came from Liu Chaoying and, in turn, China's military intelligence.<ref name=chung/>
After this crisis, according to the Senate report, Chinese officials developed a set of proposals to promote their interests with the U.S. government and to improve China's image with the American people. The proposals, which had become known in the media as the "]", were prompted by China's surprise that Congress had successfully lobbied the president to grant the visa to President Lee. The Chinese government was aware that President Clinton initially had been opposed to the visa and concluded that the influence of Congress over foreign policy was more significant than it had previously determined. When formulating the so-called plan, Chinese officials acknowledged that, compared to other countries, it had little knowledge of, or influence over, policy decisions made in Congress<ref name=chinalobby>, U.S. Senate</ref>.


Specifically, Chung testified under oath to the U.S. House Committee investigating the issue in May 1999 that he was introduced to Chinese Gen. ], then the head of Chinese ], by Liu Chaoying. Chung said that Ji told him: "We like your president very much. We would like to see him reelect{{sic}}. I will give you 300,000 U.S. dollars. You can give it to the president and the Democrat{{sic}} Party."<ref name=welike>Johnston, David, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170912201037/http://www.nytimes.com/1999/05/12/us/committee-told-of-beijing-cash-for-democrats.html |date=September 12, 2017 }}, ''The New York Times'', May 12, 1999</ref> Both Liu and the Chinese government denied the claims.<ref name=liudenial>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/21/china.money/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080524033516/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/21/china.money/|title=Chinese Aerospace Official Denies Giving To Dems|publisher=CNN|date=May 21, 1998|archive-date=May 24, 2008}}</ref>
According the Senate report, the plan instructed Chinese officials in the U.S. to improve their knowledge about members of Congress and increase contacts with its members, the public, and the media. The plan also allegedly suggested ways to lobby U.S. officials<ref name=chinalobby>, U.S. Senate</ref>.


Chung was eventually sentenced to five years' probation and community service following an agreement to plea guilty to ], ], and two misdemeanor counts of conspiring to violate election law.<ref name=justice1> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051129095054/http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2001/January/017crm.htm |date=2005-11-29 }}, Department of Justice, press release, January 11, 2001, Retrieved: April 14, 2006</ref>
Over the years, China repeatedly denied these lobbying efforts involved financial contributions of any kind:


=== John Huang and James Riady ===
<blockquote>
].|200px]]
"(S)ome people and media in the United States speculated... about so-called participation by Chinese individuals in political donations during the U.S. elections," China's ] spokesman Zhu Bangzao said in May 1998. "It is sheer fabrication and is intended to slander China." Beijing, he added, "has never, nor will we ever, use money to influence American politics"<ref name=denial>Pomfret, John, , Washington Post, ], ]</ref>.
] (pronounced "Hwa"), was another major figure convicted. Born in 1945 in ], ], Huang and his father ] at the end of the ] before he eventually emigrated to the United States in 1969. A former employee of the ]n company ]'s ] and its owners ] and his son ] (whom Huang first met along with Bill Clinton at a financial seminar in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1980), Huang became a key fund-raiser within the DNC in 1995. While there, he raised $3.4 million for the party. Nearly half had to be returned when questions arose regarding their source during later investigations by Congress.<ref name=riady> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170811203813/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/players/huang.htm |date=August 11, 2017 }}, ''The Washington Post'', July 27, 1997</ref>
</blockquote>


According to ] logs, Huang visited the ] 78 times while working as a DNC fund-raiser.<ref name=timeline> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050818022009/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/gen/resources/infocus/fundraising.flap/time9610.html |date=August 18, 2005 }}, ''CNN.com'', July 1, 1997</ref> James Riady visited the White House 20 times (including six personal visits to President Clinton).<ref name=visits> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050909053106/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/gen/resources/infocus/fundraising.flap/characters.html |date=September 9, 2005 }}, ''CNN.com'', July 1, 1997</ref>
Though the ultimate level of participation or non-participation by the Chinese government in the fund-raising schemes may never be fully known, investigations by the American media, the U.S. Justice Department, and the U.S. Congress, did prove there was a conspiracy by individuals to influence American elections with Asian funds prior to 1996.


Immediately prior to joining the DNC, Huang worked in President Clinton's Commerce Department as deputy assistant secretary for international economic affairs. His position made him responsible for Asia-U.S. trade matters. He was appointed to the position by President Clinton in December 1993. His position at the Commerce Department gave him access to classified intelligence on China. While at the department, it was later learned, Huang met 9 times with Chinese embassy officials.<ref name=highlights> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060216053814/http://www.cnn.com/US/9905/25/cox.report.highlights/ |date=February 16, 2006 }}, ''CNN.com'', May 25, 1999</ref>
== Major fund-raising figures and groups ==


Huang eventually pleaded guilty to conspiring to reimburse Lippo Group employees' campaign contributions with corporate or foreign funds.<ref name=huangfelon> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050929143317/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/08/12/huang.sentence/ |date=September 29, 2005 }}, ''CNN.com'', Aug. 12, 1999</ref> James Riady was later convicted of campaign finance violations relating to the same scheme as well, and was sentenced to pay a large fine. Shortly after Riady pledged $1 million in support of then-Governor Clinton's campaign for the presidency, contributions made by Huang had been reimbursed with funds wired from a foreign Lippo Group entity into an account Riady maintained at Lippo Bank and then distributed to Huang in cash. Also, contributions made by Lippo Group entities operating in the United States were reimbursed with ]s from foreign Lippo Group entities.<ref name=justice1/>
==== Yah Lin "Charlie" Trie and Wang Jun ====


An unclassified ] report issued in 1998 stated that both James Riady and his father Mochtar had "had a long-term relationship with a Chinese intelligence agency." According to journalist ], details of the relationship came from highly classified intelligence information supplied to the committee by both the CIA and ] (FBI).<ref name=riady1>Woodward, Bob, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170802135126/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf021098.htm |date=August 2, 2017 }}, ''The Washington Post'', Feb. 10, 1998</ref>
] The most significant of the illegal foreign contributions was a $460,000 donation by Yah Lin "Charlie" Trie to President Bill Clinton's legal defense fund. The donation was made by delivery of an envelope containing $460,000 in $1,000 contributions, some on sequentially numbered money orders made out in different names but with the same handwriting<ref name=trie>, Washington Post, ], ]</ref>.


The most well-known of John Huang's fund-raisers involved Vice President ], Maria Hsia, and the ] in California.
Born in Taiwan, Trie emigrated to the U.S. in 1974. He eventually became an American citizen and co-owner of a restaurant in ] where he befriended then Governor Clinton. In addition to the donation to Clinton's defense fund, Trie and his immediate family donated $220,000 to the DNC which was later returned<ref name=senate>, U.S. Senate (PDF file)</ref>.


=== Maria Hsia ===
In February 1996, Trie brought Wang Jun, chairman of China International Trust Investment Company (]) -- the chief investment arm of the Chinese government -- and Poly Technologies (a "front company for the Chinese military" <ref name=nti>, Retrieved ], ]</ref><ref name=poly>Russell, Richard L., , The Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol. 9, No. 3, Article 6, Sep. 2005</ref> that was later charged with smuggling 2,000 ] automatic rifles into the U.S.), to a White House "coffee" with the president<ref name=trie2>Jackson, Brooks, , ].com, ], ]</ref><ref name=highlights>, CNN.com, ], ]</ref>. President Clinton later admitted Wang's attendance at the White House was "clearly inappropriate"<ref name=jun>, Washington Post, ], ]</ref><ref name=jun1>Duffy, Michael, , TIME, ], ]</ref>.
Taiwan-born Maria Hsia (pronounced "Shya"), a long time fund raiser for ], California immigration consultant, and business associate of John Huang and James Riady since 1988, facilitated $100,000 in illegal campaign contributions through her efforts at ], a ] temple associated with ] in ]. This money went to the DNC, to the Clinton–Gore campaign, and to ] ] of ]. After a trial, Hsia was convicted in March 2000.<ref name=hsiaconviction>
Eskenazi, Michael, , ''CNN.com'', March 3, 2000 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130403040001/http://transcripts.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/03/03/gore3_3.a.tm/index.html |date=April 3, 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news
|first=Neil A.
|last=Lewis
|author-link=Neil A. Lewis
|title=Veteran Gore Fund-Raiser Goes on Trial
|date=February 8, 2000
|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2000/02/08/us/veteran-gore-fund-raiser-goes-on-trial.html
|work=The New York Times
|access-date=January 3, 2009
|quote=The real donors were ineligible to give the money either because the amount of their donations exceeded legal limits or they were foreign nationals who were prohibited from giving campaign contributions.
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121111054854/http://www.nytimes.com/2000/02/08/us/veteran-gore-fund-raiser-goes-on-trial.html
|archive-date=November 11, 2012
|url-status=live
}}</ref>


The Democratic National Committee eventually returned the money donated by the temple's monks and nuns. Twelve nuns and employees of the temple, including temple abbess Venerable Yi Kung (who resigned her post after being subpoenaed), refused to answer questions by pleading the ] when they were ]ed to testify before Congress.<ref name=witnesses>Abse, Nathan, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170810165126/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/fifth060998.htm |date=August 10, 2017 }}, ''The Washington Post'', June 9, 1998</ref> Two other Buddhist nuns admitted destroying lists of donors and other documents related to the controversy because they felt the information would embarrass the temple. A Temple-commissioned videotape of the fund raiser also went missing and the nuns' attorney claimed it may have been shipped off to Taiwan.<ref name=docdestoyed>{{cite news|url=http://cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/09/04/thompson/hearings.main/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090424170714/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/09/04/thompson/hearings.main/|title=Buddhist Nuns Admit Destroying Documents|publisher=CNN|date=September 4, 1997|archive-date=April 24, 2009}}</ref>
After questions arose regarding Trie's activities during Congressional investigations in late 1996, he left the country for China<ref name=senate>, U.S. Senate (PDF file)</ref>. Mr. Trie returned to the U.S. in 1998 and was convicted and sentenced to three years probation and four months home detention for violating federal campaign finance laws by making political contributions in someone else's name and by causing a false statement to be made to the ] (FEC)<ref name=guiltyplea>, CNN.com, ], ]</ref>.


The temple event became particularly controversial because it was attended by Vice President Gore. In an interview on the January 24, 1997, edition of the '']'' show, Gore said:
==== Johnny Chung and Liu Chaoying ====
{{blockquote|I did not know that it was a fund-raiser. But I knew it was a political event, and I knew there were finance people that were going to be present, and so that alone should have told me, 'This is inappropriate and this is a mistake; don't do this.' And I take responsibility for that. It was a mistake.<ref name=goremistake>{{cite news|url=http://cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/01/24/gore.fundraiser/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090424170710/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/01/24/gore.fundraiser/|title=Gore Admits Temple Fund-Raiser Was A 'Mistake'|publisher=CNN|date=January 24, 1997|archive-date=April 24, 2009}}</ref>}}


]]]
]
Born in Taiwan, ] went from being the owner of a "blastfaxing" business (an automated system that quickly sends out faxes to thousands of businesses) in ] to being in the middle of the Washington, D.C. elite within a couple weeks of his first donations to the Democratic Party. Called a "hustler" by a ] (NSC) aide<ref name=chung>Jackson, David and Sun, Lena H., , Washington Post, ], ]</ref>, Chung made forty-nine separate visits to the White House between February 1994 and February 1996<ref name=chung1>Isikoff, Michael, , ], ], ]</ref>. He also attended ] trade missions to ] where he befriended former Chinese Lt. Col. Liu Chaoying, daughter of former top Chinese General ], then an executive at China Aerospace Holdings (China's main satellite company).


In response, the ] that investigated the controversy said:
Between 1994 and 1996, Chung donated $366,000 to the DNC. Eventually, all of the money was returned. Chung told federal investigators that $35,000 of the money he donated came from Liu Chaoying and, in turn, China's military intelligence<ref name=chung>Jackson, David and Sun, Lena H., , Washington Post, ], ]</ref>.
{{blockquote|The Vice President's staff ... knew that the temple event was a fundraiser. In March 1996, Deputy Chief of Staff David Strauss had helped arrange a meeting in the White House with the founder of the temple, ]—a meeting which Strauss believed would 'lead to a lot of $.' The White House staff repeatedly referred to the event as a 'fundraiser' in internal correspondence, and assigned to it a 'ticket price' of '1,000–5,000 head'.<ref name=hsia1> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170904173230/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/execsumm030698.htm |date=September 4, 2017 }}, ''The Washington Post'', March 8, 1998</ref>|sign=|source=}}


John Huang's memo to Vice President Gore's assistant Kimberly Tilley specifically mentioned that the temple meeting was a fundraising event. Gore later acknowledged that he had known the visit was "finance-related."<ref name=memo>Huang, John, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060226161413/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/09/03/gore.docs/documents/huang.memo.gif |date=February 26, 2006 }}, April 11, 1996</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Neil A. |last=Lewis |author-link=Neil A. Lewis |title=THE 2000 CAMPAIGN: CAMPAIGN FINANCE; Longtime Fund-Raiser for Gore Convicted in Donation Scheme |date=March 3, 2000 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2000/03/03/us/2000-campaign-campaign-finance-longtime-fund-raiser-for-gore-convicted-donation.html |work=The New York Times |access-date=January 3, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121111054900/http://www.nytimes.com/2000/03/03/us/2000-campaign-campaign-finance-longtime-fund-raiser-for-gore-convicted-donation.html |archive-date=November 11, 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref>
Specifically, Chung testified under oath to the U.S. House Committee investigating the issue in May 1999 that he was introduced to Chinese Gen. Ji Shengde, then the head of Chinese ], by Liu Chaoying. Chung said that Ji told him: "We like your president very much. We would like to see him reelect . I will give you 300,000 U.S. dollars. You can give it to the president and the Democrat Party"<ref name=chung2>Park, Scott,
, ], ], ]</ref>. Ms. Liu and the Chinese government denied the claims.


<!-- It is illegal for religious organizations to hold political fund-raising events in the U.S. due to their tax-exempt status. -->
<blockquote>
In the U.S., religious organizations enjoy a ]. Political activity is prohibited for such tax exempt entities.
"The Chinese government has always opposed the interference by any country in the internal affairs of another country. China has never and never will use money to influence U.S. politics. China has never made political donations," a statement issued by the Chinese Foreign Ministry said<ref name=denial1>, CNN.com, ], ]</ref>.
The Senate Governmental Affairs Committee also said they learned that Hsia had served as an "agent" of the PRC government.<ref name=hsia1/> Hsia denied the claim.
</blockquote>


=== Ted Sioeng ===
Mr. Chung was eventually convicted of bank fraud, tax evasion, and two misdemeanor counts of conspiring to violate election law<ref name=justice1>, Department of Justice, press release, ], ]</ref>.
Ted Sioeng, an Indonesian entrepreneur who donated money to both Democrats and Republicans, was the sixth individual whose donations were investigated by the Senate committee. Suspect contributions associated with Sioeng include $250,000 to the DNC and $100,000 to Republican ] ]. Fong returned the money in April 1997.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1997-04-23-mn-51508-story.html|title=Fong Returns $100,000 in Gifts|date=April 23, 1997|author=Jacobs, Paul|author2=Morain, Dan|journal=Los Angeles Times|access-date=March 10, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402152727/http://articles.latimes.com/1997-04-23/news/mn-51508_1_democratic-national-committee|archive-date=April 2, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref>


Sieong sat with Bill Clinton or Al Gore at two fundraising events.<ref name= SenCommGovAff98/>{{page needed|date=October 2015}} Sioeng also joined Fong at a meeting with then Republican ] ] in mid-1995. Gingrich called the meeting a "]".<ref name=photoop>{{cite news|url=http://cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/05/12/chinese.donor/|title=FBI Probes Businessman As Possible Chinese Agent|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090423050727/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/05/12/chinese.donor/|archive-date=April 23, 2009|publisher=CNN|date=May 12, 1997}}</ref> Gingrich was the guest of honor at a Sioeng-organized luncheon the day after a Sioeng family company gave
==== John Huang and James Riady ====
the $50,000 think-tank donation, solicited by a Gingrich adviser.<ref name="fas.org">{{cite web |url=https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/6-9.htm |title=Response To Majority Report |publisher=Fas.org |access-date=March 19, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604045834/http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/6-9.htm |archive-date=June 4, 2011 |url-status=live }}</ref>


] ] and the directors of the FBI, CIA and ] (NSA) told members of the Senate committee they had credible intelligence information indicating Sioeng acted on behalf of China. A spokesman for Sioeng denied the allegations.<ref name=chinaagent>Woodward, Bob and Duffy, Brian {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170811010632/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf091297b.htm |date=August 11, 2017 }}, ''The Washington Post'', September 12, 1997</ref> Sioeng left the country shortly thereafter, and no charges were filed.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/18/exclusive-commerce-pick-tied-china-cash/|title=Commerce pick tied to China cash|work=The Washington Times|date=March 18, 2009|access-date=December 27, 2014|author1=Seper, Jerry|author2=Gertz, Bill|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150101151923/http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/18/exclusive-commerce-pick-tied-china-cash/|archive-date=January 1, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref>
]]]
John Huang (pronounced "Wong") was another major figure. Born in 1945 as Jian-Nan Huang in ], China, Huang and his family originally moved to Taiwan before he eventually emigrated to the United States in 1969. A former employee of the Indonesian company ]'s ] and its owners ] and his son ] (whom he first met along with Bill Clinton at a financial seminar in Little Rock, Arkansas in 1980), Huang became a key fund-raiser within the DNC in 1995. While there, Huang raised $3.4 million for the party. Nearly half had to be returned when questions arose regarding their source during later investigations by Congress<ref name=riady>, Washington Post, ], ]</ref>.


=== Bernard Schwartz ===
The most well-known of his fund-raisers involved Vice President ], Maria Hsia, and the ] in California.
] CEO of ], a satellite communications company, donated over $600,000 to the ].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Justice May Probe Links Between China Policy, Campaign Cash - May 17, 1998|url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/17/satellite.review/|access-date=2022-01-27|website=www.cnn.com}}</ref> Schwartz said he did not expect, need, or receive any special treatment from the Clinton administration as a result of his donations.<ref>{{Cite web|title=washingtonpost.com: Campaign Finance Special Report|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/loral052598.htm|access-date=2022-01-27|website=www.washingtonpost.com}}</ref> In 1998 Loral was under investigation for illegally transferring satellite technology to China.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Red Face Over China - June 1, 1998|url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/25/time/china.missles.html|access-date=2022-01-27|website=www.cnn.com}}</ref>


In February 1998 during the time Loral was under investigation, Loral requested Clinton to sign a waiver which would allow Loral to ship satellite technology to China. Clinton's justice department advised against signing the waiver because they believed that a jury wouldn't convict Loral if they received a waiver from Clinton.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Red Face Over China - June 1, 1998|url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/25/time/china.missles.html|access-date=2022-01-27|website=www.cnn.com}}</ref> Clinton did eventually sign the waiver.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Clinton Defends China Satellite Waiver - May 22, 1998|url=https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/22/china.money/|access-date=2022-01-27|website=www.cnn.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Red Face Over China - June 1, 1998|url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/25/time/china.missles.html|access-date=2022-01-27|website=www.cnn.com}}</ref> The U.S space technology received by China may have furthered Beijing's military development of nuclear missiles.<ref name="Mintz">{{Cite web|last=Mintz|first=John|date=2003-01-01|title=2 U.S. space giants accused of aiding China / Hughes, Boeing allegedly gave away missile technology illegally|url=https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/2-U-S-space-giants-accused-of-aiding-China-2688259.php|access-date=2022-01-27|website=SFGATE|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Washingtonpost.com: Panel Faults Space Aid to China|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/satellite123198.htm|access-date=2022-01-27|website=www.washingtonpost.com}}</ref> In 2002 Loral would later be fined $14 million for its involvement in illegally transferring classified secrets to China.<ref name="Mintz"/>
According to ] logs, Huang visited the White House 78 times while working as a DNC fund-raiser<ref name=timeline>, CNN.com, ], ]</ref>. James Riady visited the White House 20 times (including 6 personal visits to President Clinton)<ref name=visits>, CNN.com, ], ]</ref>.


== Investigations ==
Immediately prior to joining the DNC, Huang worked in President Clinton's Commerce Department as deputy assistant secretary for international economic affairs. His position made him responsible for Asian/U.S. trade matters. He was appointed to the position by President Clinton in December 1993. His position at the Commerce Department gave him access to classified intelligence on China. While at the department, it was later learned, Huang met 9 times with Chinese embassy officials in Washington D.C. The reason for the meetings have never been learned<ref name=highlights>, CNN.com, ], ]</ref>.
=== Department of Justice investigation ===

]The Justice Department opened a task force in late 1996 to begin investigating allegations of campaign fundraising abuses by the Clinton/Gore re-election campaign. It expanded its internal investigation to include activities related to President Bill Clinton's legal defense fund in December 1996.<ref name=defense> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050909025007/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/9612/19/justice.expand/ |date=September 9, 2005 }}, ''CNN.com'', December 19, 1996</ref>
Some DNC records suggested Huang started fund-raising before he left his government job which would have been a violation of the U.S. law known as the ], though no charges regarding this issue were ever brought<ref name=riady>, Washington Post, ], ]</ref>. Huang eventually pleaded guilty to conspiring to reimburse Lippo Group employees' campaign contributions with corporate or foreign funds<ref name=huangfelon>, CNN.com, ], ]</ref>. James Riady was later convicted of campaign finance violations relating to the same scheme as well.

<blockquote>
"Your honor," Riady told ] Judge Consuelo Marshall, "mistakes have been made, which I regret. I did not have to come back here (to the United States) but I wanted to own up to what I did and put this all behind me. I am grateful for the opportunity to be here today"<ref name=court>, ]News.com, ], ]</ref>.
</blockquote>

According to the Justice Department some of those "mistakes" included reimbursing contributions made by Huang and various employees of Lippo Bank with funds wired from a foreign Lippo Group entity into an account maintained by Huang at a bank in ]. Shortly after Riady pledged $1 million in support of then-] Clinton's campaign for the presidency, contributions made by Huang were reimbursed with funds wired from a foreign Lippo Group entity into an account Riady maintained at Lippo Bank and then distributed to Huang in cash. Also, contributions made by Lippo Group entities operating in the United States were reimbursed with ]s from foreign Lippo Group entities<ref name=justice1>, Department of Justice, press release, ], ]</ref>.

An unclassified U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs report issued in 1998 stated that both James Riady and his father Mochtar had "had a long-term relationship with a Chinese intelligence agency." According to a story by journalist Bob Woodward, "the report was drawn from highly classified intelligence information supplied by both the ] (CIA) and ] (FBI) that was not revealed during several months of public committee hearings the (previous) year"<ref name=riady1>Woodward, Bob, , Washington Post, ], ]</ref>.

==== Maria Hsia and the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple ====

] with Maria Hsia (left), Master Hsing Yun, Ted Sioeng (right), and John Huang (2nd from right in background)]]
A close business associate of John Huang and James Riady since 1988, Taiwan-born Maria Hsia (pronounced "Shah") began her association with Al Gore the same year as well. The association began after Hsia sent the then-senator a letter inviting him to come visit Taiwan: "If you decide to join this trip, I will persuade all my colleagues in the future to play a leader role in your presidential race..."<ref name=hsia>Suro, Roberto, , Washington Post, ], ]</ref>

Gore went, and the two began an eight-year relationship. Mr. Gore said his dealings with Hsia were strictly business in nature, but, at least at one point, Gore sent a letter to Ms. Hsia referring to her as "special friend"<ref name=hsia>Suro, Roberto, , Washington Post, ], ]</ref>.

Regardless, their relationship came to an end when she was charged with money-laundering in early 1998. The Justice Department alleged Hsia facilitated $100,000 in illegal contributions to the 1996 Clinton-Gore reelection campaign through her efforts at the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple in California. Hsia was eventually convicted by a jury in March 2000<ref name=hsiaconviction>Eskenazi, Michael, , CNN.com, ], ]</ref>. The Democratic National Committee eventually returned the money donated by the Temple's monks and nuns. Former Vice President Gore said he had no idea the Temple meeting was financial in nature:

<blockquote>
"I did not know that it was a fund-raiser. But I knew it was a political event, and I knew there were finance people that were going to be present, and so that alone should have told me, 'This is inappropriate and this is a mistake; don't do this.' And I take responsibility for that. It was a mistake"<ref name=hsia1>, Washington Post ], ]</ref>.
</blockquote>

]
The U.S. Senate Governmental Affairs Committee that investigated the controversy said, however:

<blockquote>
"The Vice President's staff... knew that the Temple event was a fundraiser. In March 1996, Deputy Chief of Staff David Strauss had helped arrange a meeting in the White House with the head of the Temple, Master ] – a meeting which Strauss believed would 'lead to a lot of $.' The White House staff repeatedly referred to the event as a 'fundraiser' in internal correspondence, and assigned to it a 'ticket price' of '1000-5000 head'"<ref name=hsia1>, Washington Post ], ]</ref>.
</blockquote>

It is illegal for religious organizations to hold political fund-raising events in the U.S. due to their tax-exempt status.

The Senate Governmental Affairs Committee also said they learned that Hsia had served as an "agent" of the Chinese government<ref name=hsia1>, Washington Post ], ]</ref>. Hsia denied the claim.

==== Ted Sioeng ====

Another notable figure involved in the affair was Ted Sioeng (pronounced "Shong") who illegally donated money to both Democrats and ]. Sioeng, who doesn't speak English, found himself invited to sit side-by-side with President Clinton or Vice President Gore at three different fundraising events<ref name=sioeng>, U.S. Senate (PDF file)</ref>.

According to the U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, $200,000 of the $400,000 that Sioeng and his family gave to Democrats was "funded by transfer from overseas accounts." All the money was eventually returned.

Also, from their report:
<blockquote>"(I)n late July 1997... (t)he Committee learned that Chinese government officials... were aware of, and possibly encouraged, (Ted) Sioeng's purchase of a Los Angeles-based newspaper... in 1995 and succeeded in having the paper report from a pro-] perspective. There was also information suggesting that Sioeng met with Chinese officials in 1995 and 1996."</blockquote>

Furthermore,
]
<blockquote>"Sioeng also may have been involved in directing or funding contributions to American political entities and campaigns. The public information obtained by the Committee suggests that Sioeng personally directed contributions to Republican California officials in 1995. According to public information, Sioeng was involved in these contributions, but the source of the contributions is difficult to determine. The non-public information suggests that approximately half of the just over $100,000 used for these contributions may have come from unknown sources in China. According to public information, one of the officials, Republican California State Treasurer, ], has returned the $100,000 he received from Sioeng"<ref name=senate3>, U.S. Senate</ref>.</blockquote>

Former Attorney General ] and the directors of the FBI, CIA and ] (NSA) told members of the Senate committee they had credible intelligence information indicating Sioeng acted on behalf of China<ref name=chinaagent>Woodward, Bob and Duffy, Brian , Washington Post, ],]</ref>.

== Department of Justice investigation ==

]
The Justice Department opened a task force in late 1996 to begin investigating allegations of campaign fund-raising abuses by the Clinton/Gore re-election campaign. It expanded its internal investigation to include activities related to President Bill Clinton's legal defense fund in December 1997<ref name=defense>, CNN.com, ], ]</ref>.


President Clinton announced in February 1997 that he thought there should be a "vigorous" and "thorough" investigation into reports that the People's Republic of China tried to direct financial contributions from overseas sources to the Democratic National Committee. The president stopped short of calling for an independent prosecutor, saying that was the decision of the Justice Department. President Clinton announced in February 1997 that he thought there should be a "vigorous" and "thorough" investigation into reports that the People's Republic of China tried to direct financial contributions from overseas sources to the Democratic National Committee. The president stopped short of calling for an independent prosecutor, saying that was the decision of the Justice Department.


"(O)bviously it would be a very serious matter for the United States if any country were to attempt to funnel funds to one of our parties for any reason whatever," President Clinton said<ref name=serious>, CNN.com, ], ]</ref>. "bviously it would be a very serious matter for the United States if any country were to attempt to funnel funds to one of our parties for any reason whatever," President Clinton said.<ref name=serious> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041215081947/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/02/13/chinese.money/ |date=December 15, 2004 }}, ''CNN.com'', February 13, 1997</ref>


By July 1997, the administration determined that no evidence of any such thing had yet been proven. By July 1997, the administration determined that no evidence of any such thing had yet been proven.


"We have received the relevant (FBI) briefings," White House press secretary ] said. "We believe there's no basis for any change in our policy toward China, which is one of engagement"<ref name=congressconcerns>Harris, John F., , Washington Post, ], ]</ref>. "We have received the relevant briefings," ] ] said. "We believe there's no basis for any change in our policy toward China, which is one of engagement."<ref name=congressconcerns>Harris, John F., {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170802131239/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf072097.htm |date=August 2, 2017 }}, ''The Washington Post'', July 20, 1997</ref>


"I do not know whether it is true or not," President Clinton stated. "Therefore, since I don't know, it can't... and shouldn't affect the larger long-term strategic interests of the American people in our foreign policy."<ref name=congressconcerns>Harris, John F., , Washington Post, ], ]</ref>. "I do not know whether it is true or not," President Clinton stated. "Therefore, since I don't know, it can't... and shouldn't affect the larger long-term strategic interests of the American people in our foreign policy."<ref name="congressconcerns" />


Members of Congress of both parties reached opposite conclusions, however. According to the Washington Post: "Sen(ator) Fred D. Thompson (a Republican from ]), chairman of the committee investigating allegations of illegal 1996 campaign fund-raising, has said he believes the Chinese plan targeted presidential and congressional elections. (While Democratic Senators ]) ] and (]) ] sa(id) they believe the evidence show(ed) the Chinese targeted only congressional elections"<ref name=congressconcerns>Harris, John F., , Washington Post, ], ]</ref>. Members of Congress of both parties reached disparate conclusions. According to ''The Washington Post'', Senator ] (a Republican from ]) and chairman of the committee investigating the fundraising controversy, said he believed the Chinese plan targeted presidential and congressional elections while Democratic Senators ] and ] said they believed the evidence showed the Chinese targeted only congressional elections.<ref name="congressconcerns" />


=== Congressional investigations ===
Peter Lund, a retired China analyst for the ], felt the U.S. had become the target of a sustained Chinese intelligence campaign as well. In 1996, he wrote: "Not only have the Chinese obtained some of the United States' most closely guarded secrets, but there is a strong reason to believe that they have secured agents of influence in the government, the civil service, academia, the media and the private business sector"<ref name=lund>Lacey, Marc, "FBI Warned Feinstein of China Aim to Funnel Cash", ], ], ]</ref>.
With regard to their overall efficacy, investigators are on record as having stated that the Congressional investigations were hamstrung due to lack of co-operation of witnesses. Ninety-four people either refused to be questioned, pled the Fifth Amendment, or left the country altogether.<ref name="witnesses" /><ref name=yourcampaign> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304122457/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/op100897.htm |date=March 4, 2016 }}, ''The Washington Post'', October 8, 1997</ref><ref>" {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160928081622/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/players/glenn.htm |date=September 28, 2016 }}" (March 4, 1998) ''The Washington Post''</ref>


] (]-])]]
=== Calls for an indepedent counsel ===
The U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs held public hearings into the campaign finance issues from July to October 1997. The Committee, chaired by Republican ], adopted a Republican-written final report (the Wikisource referenced and appearing herein) on a straight party-line vote, 8 in favor and 7 opposing, in March 1998. Thompson described the findings as "not any one real big thing" but "a lot of things strung together that paint a real ugly picture."<ref name="CNN" /> The Democrats published a minority report dissenting with most of the conclusions of the final report, stating the evidence "does not support the conclusion that the China plan was aimed at, or affected, the 1996 presidential election."<ref name="CNN">Crowley, Candy (1998) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071212202252/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/03/05/campaign.finance/ |date=December 12, 2007 }} ''CNN'' (online, March 5), accessed 5 October 2015.</ref> Considerable acrimony was displayed during the hearings between ] and the ranking minority member, Democrat ], with the public disagreements between the two leaders reaching a level seldom seen in recent years in Congressional committees.<ref>Rosenbaum, David E. (1997). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170907233931/http://www.nytimes.com/1997/09/24/us/campaign-finance-the-hearings-anger-flares-as-focus-shifts-to-campaign-remedies.html |date=September 7, 2017 }} '']'' (online, September 24), accessed 6 November 2015.</ref>


] (]-])]]
]
A ] investigation, headed by Indiana Republican ] focused on allegations of campaign finance abuse, including the contributions channeled through Chung, Huang, and Trie. The investigation was lengthy, spanning both the 105th and 106th Congresses, and according to a Democratic report had cost over $7.4 million as of August 31, 1998, making it the most expensive Congressional investigation ever (the Senate ] investigation cost $7 million in 1998 dollars).<ref name=cost> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060127053227/http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20050124115157-73108.pdf |date=2006-01-27 }}, U.S. House of Representatives, Retrieved: April 14, 2006</ref>
President Clinton's FBI Director ] wrote in a 22-page memorandum to then Attorney General Janet Reno in November 1997 that "It is difficult to imagine a more compelling situation for appointing an ]"<ref name=freeh>Lewis, Neil A., , New York Times, ], ]</ref>.


], a Congressional expert at the ] said in May 1998, "Barring some dramatic change, I think the Burton investigation is going to be remembered as a case study in how not to do a congressional investigation and as a prime example of investigation as farce."<ref name=partisian>Lacey, Marc, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107114538/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/29150984.html?dids=29150984:29150984&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=May+2,+1998&author=MARC+LACEY&pub=Los+Angeles&edition=&startpage=14&desc=NEWS+ANALYSIS |date=November 7, 2012 }}, ''Los Angeles Times'', May 2, 1998</ref> In a May 5, 1998, letter to other Republicans on the committee, Burton admitted that "mistakes and omissions were made" in tape transcripts released to the public of phone calls made by ]. A committee investigator who was an advocate of releasing the tapes resigned at Burton's request.<ref>, ''CNN'', May 8, 1998 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081119031208/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/06/hubbell.tapes/ |date=November 19, 2008 }}</ref>
In July 1998, the Justice Department's campaign finance task force head, Charles LaBella, sent a report to Janet Reno also recommending she seek an independent counsel to investigate alleged fund-raising abuses by Democratic party officials<ref name=labella>Thomas, Pierre, , CNN.com, ], ]</ref>. The media reported that LaBella believed there was clearly an appearance of a conflict of interest by Ms. Reno<ref name=lehrer>, ], transcript, ], ], ]</ref>.


=== Calls for an independent counsel ===
Robert Conrad, Jr., who later became head of the task force, called on Ms. Reno in Spring 2000 to appoint an independent counsel to look into the fund-raising practices of Vice President Gore<ref name=lehrer1>, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, transcript, PBS, ], ]</ref>.
]President Clinton's ] ] wrote in a 22-page memorandum to then Clinton's critics called of the scandal, nicknamed "Chinagate."<ref>Yuwu Song, ed., ''Encyclopedia of Chinese-American Relations'' (McFarland, 2009) p 63.</ref> Attorney General Janet Reno said in November 1997 that "It is difficult to imagine a more compelling situation for appointing an ]."<ref name=freeh>Lewis, Neil A., , ''The New York Times'', June 16, 1998</ref>


In July 1998, the Justice Department's campaign finance task force head, ], sent a report to Janet Reno also recommending she seek an independent counsel to investigate alleged fundraising abuses by Democratic party officials.<ref name=labella>Thomas, Pierre, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060210100107/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/07/23/labella/ |date=February 10, 2006 }}, ''CNN.com'', July 23, 1998</ref> The media reported that La Bella believed there was clearly an appearance of a conflict of interest by Reno.<ref name=lehrer>, ], transcript, '']'', August 4, 1998, Retrieved: April 14, 2006 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060516201550/http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/july-dec98/reno_8-4a.html |date=May 16, 2006 }}</ref>
Ms. Reno rejected all of these requests:


], who later became head of the task force, called on Reno in Spring 2000 to appoint an independent counsel to look into the fundraising practices of Vice President Gore.<ref name=lehrer1>, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, transcript, ''PBS'', June 23, 2000, Retrieved: April 14, 2006 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041012130742/http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/jan-june00/gore_6-23.html |date=October 12, 2004 }}</ref>
<blockquote>
"I try to do one thing: what's right," Reno said. "I am trying to follow the independent counsel statute as it has been framed by Congress. If you had a lower threshold, then any time somebody said 'boo' about a covered person, you'd trigger the independent counsel statute"<ref name=reno>, CNN.com, ], ]</ref>.
</blockquote>


Janet Reno declined all requests:
Six weeks after this statement, Ms. Reno agreed to ] independent counsel ]'s request to look into allegations that President Clinton had committed ] and ] relating to the ] lawsuit brought against him by ] (a former Arkansas state employee during Clinton's governorship there)<ref name=jones>Baker, Peter, et al., , Washington Post, ], ]</ref>.
{{blockquote|I try to do one thing: what's right. I am trying to follow the independent counsel statute as it has been framed by Congress. If you had a lower threshold, then any time somebody said 'boo' about a covered person, you'd trigger the independent counsel statute
—Janet Reno, December 4, 1997.<ref name=reno> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060517213044/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/12/04/reno.briefing/ |date=May 17, 2006 }}, ''CNN.com'', December 4, 1997</ref>|sign=|source=}}


A ]/'']'' poll taken in May 1998 found 58 percent of Americans felt an independent counsel should have been appointed to investigate the controversy. Thirty-three percent were opposed. The same poll found that 47 percent of Americans believed a '']'' existed between the Clinton administration and the PRC government.<ref name=poll1>Holland, Keating, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070102041219/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/20/poll/ |date=January 2, 2007 }}, ''CNN''.com, May 20, 1998</ref>
Critics such as columnist Charles Krauthammer, as well as a number of FBI agents, suggested that the investigations into the improper fund-raising allegations were impeded as part of a cover-up<ref name=critic>], (Opinion), Washington Post, ], ]</ref><ref name=critic1>Sperry, Paul, , ], ], ]</ref>.


=== Notable convictions secured === === Calls for impeachment ===
{{Main|Efforts to impeach Bill Clinton}}


In 1997 ] and eighteen other Republicans signed a resolution to impeach Bill Clinton for alleged campaign finance law violations and obstruction of congressional investigations.<ref>{{Cite web|title=17 Nov 1997, Page 3 - Asheville Citizen-Times at Newspapers.com|url=http://www.newspapers.com/image/197738955/|access-date=2021-11-21|website=Newspapers.com|language=en}}</ref> Anti Clinton activists collected 100,000 signatures supporting his impeachment.<ref>{{Cite web|title=5 Dec 1997, Page 20 - Standard-Speaker at Newspapers.com|url=http://www.newspapers.com/image/59665755/|access-date=2021-11-21|website=Newspapers.com|language=en}}</ref>
Even without an appointment of an independent counsel, the Justice Department's internal investigation was fruitful. The task force created to investigate campaign fund-raising irregularities during the 1996 U.S. elections secured criminal convictions against 17 people by 2001.


=== Criticism of investigation ===
Some of the most notable convictions were against ] (a former member of the ]), who pleaded guilty in 2001 to failure to declare and pay taxes on $30,000 in income which he received in 1995 from "Charlie" Trie (The $30,000 was for a planned business venture between the two); James Riady, who pleaded guilty in March 2001 to campaign finance violations by himself and his corporation and was sentenced to pay fines of $8.6 million (The most ever against an individual) for using foreign corporate funds to back Bill Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign. In addition to the fines, Riady was put on probation for two years and ordered to do 400 hours of community service; Maria Hsia, who was convicted on charges of causing false statements to be submitted to the FEC, and John Huang, who pleaded guilty to a felony charge that he conspired with other employees of Lippo Group to make campaign contributions and reimburse employees with corporate funds or with funds from Indonesia. He was sentenced to one year of probation, 500 hours of community service, a $10,000 fine and directed by the judge to continue cooperating with the investigation as a condition of his probation.
In addition to partisan complaints from Republicans, columnists ], ], and ], as well as a number of FBI agents, suggested the investigations into the fundraising controversies were willfully impeded.<ref name=critic>Krauthammer, Charles, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170417221229/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/op101097.htm |date=April 17, 2017 }} (Opinion), ''The Washington Post'', October 10, 1997</ref><ref name=chineseagents>Safire, William, (Opinion), ''The New York Times'', October 7, 1999</ref><ref name=critic1>Kondracke, Morton, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050828170419/http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/kondracke080999.asp |date=August 28, 2005 }} (Opinion), '']'', August 9, 1999</ref>


FBI agent Ivian Smith wrote a letter to FBI Director Freeh that expressed "a lack of confidence" in the Justice Department's attorneys regarding the fundraising investigation. He wrote: "I am convinced the team at... leading this investigation is, at best, simply not up to the task... The impression left is the emphasis on how not to prosecute matters, not how to aggressively conduct investigations leading to prosecutions." Smith and three other FBI agents later testified before Congress in late 1999 that Justice Department prosecutors impeded their inquiry. FBI agent Daniel Wehr told Congress that the first head U.S. attorney in the investigation, Laura Ingersoll, told the agents they should "not pursue any matter related to solicitation of funds for access to the president. The reason given was, 'That's the way the American political process works.' I was scandalized by that," Wehr said. The four FBI agents also said that Ingersoll prevented them from executing ]s to stop destruction of evidence and micromanaged the case beyond all reason.<ref name=critic2> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20011006073736/http://www.usatoday.com/news/index/finance/ncfin359.htm |date=October 6, 2001 }}, ''Associated Press'', September 22, 1999</ref>
Additionally, the list of notable convictions includes "Charlie" Trie, who was sentenced in 1999 after pleading guilty to three years probation, four months home detention, 200 hours of community service, and a $5,000 fine for violating federal campaign finance laws by making political contributions in someone else's name and by causing a false statement to be made to the FEC; Johnny Chung, who was sentenced in late 1998 to probation and 3,000 hours of community service for bank fraud, tax evasion and two misdemeanor counts of conspiring to violate election law, and Howard Glicken (a fund-raiser for the Democratic party) who was sentenced to 18 months probation, an $80,000 fine, and ordered to perform 500 hours of community service for violating campaign finance laws.


FBI agents were also denied the opportunity to ask President Clinton and Vice President Gore questions during Justice Department interviews in 1997 and 1998 and were only allowed to take notes. During the interviews, neither Clinton nor Gore were asked any questions about fund-raisers John Huang and James Riady, nor the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple fundraising event led by Maria Hsia and attended by Huang and Ted Sioeng.<ref name=neverquestioned> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040704194809/http://www.usatoday.com/news/index/finance/ncfin363.htm |date=July 4, 2004 }}, ''Associated Press'', December 16, 1999</ref>
])]]
Donors to former Democratic Senator ] (a member of the Senate Government Affairs Committee during the time its investigations took place) were particularly affected by the criminal investigations. David Chang, a member of the 1996 Torricelli Campaign Finance Committee, pled guilty to violating federal election law by making illegal contributions to Torricelli's campaign. Chang also pled guilty to witness tampering in connection with the campaign financing task force investigation. Chang's co-defendant, Audrey Yu, pled guilty to obstruction of justice under the same superseding indictment. Lawrence Penna, the former president of a now-defunct New Jersey securities firm, was charged with violating election laws by funneling illegal campaign contributions to the 1996 federal election campaigns of both President Clinton and Sen. Torricelli. Cha-Kuek Koo, a New Jersey businessman, pled guilty to violating federal election law by making illegal contributions to the Torricelli's Campaign. Koo admitted to assisting David Chang in making conduit contributions using Koo's employees at LG Group, Executive Office of the Americas. Berek Don, former Republican party leader in ], pleaded guilty to another conduit contribution scheme to the Senator's Campaign. Carmine Alampi, a Bergen County New Jersey attorney, pleaded guilty to the same scheme<ref name=justice>, Department of Justice, press release, ], ]</ref><ref name=justice1>, Department of Justice, press release, ], ]</ref>. Senator Torricelli announced on ], ] he would not stand for re-election as a result of the controversy<ref name=nj>, CNN.com, ], ]</ref>.

== Congressional investigations ==

=== Senate Government Affairs Committee ===

]
Opening statements of public hearings on ], ] from Senate Committee Chairman Senator ]:

<blockquote>
"I would like to turn our attention to one of the most troublesome areas of this investigation. I speak of allegations concerning a plan hatched during the last election cycle by the Chinese government and designed to pour illegal money into American political campaigns. The plan had a goal: to buy access and influence in furtherance of Chinese government interests."
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
"The committee," he continued, "believes that... Chinese government officials crafted a plan to increase China's influence over the U.S. political process. The committee has identified specific steps taken in furtherance of the plan. Implementation of the plan has been handled by Chinese government officials and individuals enlisted to assist in the effort... Our investigation suggests that the plan continues today. Although most discussions of the plan focuses on Congress, our investigation suggests it affected the 1996 presidential race and state elections as well. The government of China is believed to have allocated substantial sums of money to achieve its objectives. Another aspect of the plan is remarkable because it shows that the PRC is interested in developing long-term relationships with persons it has identified as up and coming government -- up and coming officials at state and local levels. The intent is to establish relations that can be cultivated as the officials rise through the ranks to higher office"<ref name=opening>, transcript, PBS, ], ]</ref>.
</blockquote>

Opening comments from the Committee's Minority Leader, Senator John Glenn (a Democrat from ]):

]
<blockquote>
"According to the press the Chinese government intended to use a relatively modest amount of money to gain influence in the Washington ] game, and it intended to do this by focusing on the legislative branch of government. Now, I mention these reports here because I am greatly concerned about how the reports are sometimes discussed by individuals in this body and in the press. I've heard language like infiltration, foreign ], foreigners, as we're jeopardizing our ]. Well, on this issue the committee should go just as far as the facts take us, recognizing that it's the FBI that's in a much better position to do an ] investigation. Now, let's be careful, however, not to jump to conclusions that ] has been committed based on a partial story with ambiguous information. But wherever the trail leads let's look at it"<ref name=opening>, transcript, PBS, ], ]</ref>.
</blockquote>

=== House Government Reform and Oversight Committee ===

])]]
A ] investigation, headed by Republican ], also focused on allegations of campaign finance abuse, including the contributions channeled through Chung, Huang, Trie, et al.

The investigation was lengthy, spanning both the 105th and 106th Congresses, and according to a Democratic report had cost over $7.4 million as of ], ], making it the most expensive Congressional investigation ever (the Senate ] investigation cost $7 million in 1998 dollars)<ref name=cost>, U.S. House of Representatives</ref>.

The investigation itself was quite controversial, attracting biting criticism as partisan and abusive. Norman Ornstein, a Congressional expert at the ] said in May 1998, "Barring some dramatic change, I think the Burton investigation is going to be remembered as a case study in how not to do a congressional investigation and as a prime example of investigation as farce"<ref name=partisian>Lacey, Marc, "House Probe of Campaign Fund-Raising Uncovers Little, Piles Up Partisan Ill Will", Los Angeles Times, ], ]</ref>. A ] editorial characterized the Burton investigation as a "House investigation travesty" and a "parody of a reputable investigation"<ref name=laeditorial>Editorial, Los Angeles Times, ], ]</ref>. A Washington Post editorial called the investigation "its own cartoon, a joke, and a deserved embarrassment"<ref name=posteditorial>Editorial, Washington Post, ], ]</ref>.

Investigators, however, complained the investigation took so long due to the unprecedented lack of co-operation of witnesses. Ninety-four people either refused to be questioned, pled the ], or left the country altogether<ref name=witnesses>Abse, Nathan, , Washington Post, ], ]</ref>.


== See also == == See also ==
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]:
*Legal dispute between former New Zealand Members of Parliament ] and ] which stemmed from a donation to Bridges by Chinese businessman Yikun Zhang


== References == == References ==
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}


==Further reading==
<div style="font-size: 95%">
* Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1998). E.g., "Summary of Findings" (Chapter 3), "The China Connection: Summary of Committee's Findings Relating to the Effort of the People's Republic of China to Influence U.S. Policies and Elections" (Chapter 18), and "Charlie Trie's Contributions to the Presidential Legal Expense Trust (Chapter 20), in ''Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Final Report'' (Senate Report 105-167, March 10, 1998, 105th Congress, 2d Session), see , , , and , accessed 6 October 2015. Note, this is the full citation and an alternate web location of the WikiSource, , given above.
<references/>
* Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1998). E.g., "Volume 4 of 6, Minority Views of Senators Glenn, Levin, Lieberman, Akaka, Durbin, Torricelli, and Cleland, Part 1. Foreign Influence, Chapter 2, The China Plan" in ''Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Final Report'' (Senate Report 105-167, March 10, 1998, 105th Congress, 2d Session), see , and , accessed 6 October 2015. Note, this is part of the full citation and an alternative web location of the WikiSource, , given above.
</div>

== External links ==

* (PDF files)

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*


==External links==
== Bibliography ==
*Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Report in full: ''''
*
*


{{Presidency of Bill Clinton}}
*{{cite book
| first = Bill
| last = Clinton
| year = 2000
| month = February
| title = The Clinton Foreign Policy Reader
| publisher = M.E. Sharpe
| id = ISBN 0765605848
}}
*{{cite book
| first = Bill
| last = Gertz
| year = 2002
| month = January
| title = The China Threat: How the People's Republic Targets America
| publisher = Regnery Publishing
| id = ISBN 0895261871
}}
*{{cite book
| first = Edward
| last = Timperlake
| coauthors = William Triplett
| year = 1998
| month = October
| title = Year of the Rat
| publisher = Regnery Publishing
| id = ISBN 0895263335
}}
*{{cite book
| first = Ezra F.
| last = Vogel
| year = 1997
| month = September
| title = Living With China
| publisher = W. W. Norton & Company
| id = ISBN 039331734X
}}


]
]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 10:49, 7 December 2024

Chinese lobbying controversy in the United States "Chinagate" redirects here. Not to be confused with things called "China Gate".

The 1996 United States campaign finance controversy, sometimes referred to as Chinagate, was an effort by the People's Republic of China to influence domestic American politics prior to and during the Clinton administration and also involved the fundraising practices of the administration itself.

While questions regarding the U.S. Democratic Party's fundraising activities first arose over a Los Angeles Times article published on September 21, 1996, China's role in the affair first gained public attention when Bob Woodward and Brian Duffy of The Washington Post published a story stating that a United States Department of Justice investigation into the fundraising activities had uncovered evidence that agents of China sought to direct contributions from foreign sources to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) before the 1996 presidential campaign. The journalists wrote that intelligence information had shown the Chinese embassy in Washington, D.C. was used for coordinating contributions to the DNC in violation of United States law forbidding non-American citizens or non-permanent residents from giving monetary donations to United States politicians and political parties. A Republican investigator of the controversy stated that the Chinese plan targeted both presidential and congressional United States elections, while Democratic senators said the evidence showed the Chinese targeted only congressional elections. The government of the People's Republic of China denied all accusations.

Background

According to the U.S. Senate report, Chinese officials eventually developed a set of proposals to promote their interests with the United States government and to improve China's image with the American people. The proposals, dubbed the "China Plan", were prompted by the United States Congress's successful lobbying of President Bill Clinton to grant a visa to Taiwan President Lee Teng-hui. U.S. Secretary of State Warren Christopher had previously assured his Chinese counterpart Chinese Foreign Minister Qian Qichen that granting a visa would be "inconsistent with unofficial relationship " and the Clinton Administration's acquiescence to the Congressional resolutions led China to conclude that the influence of Congress over foreign policy was more significant than it had previously determined. When formulating the so-called plan, Chinese officials acknowledged that, compared to other countries, it had little knowledge of, or influence over, policy decisions made in Congress, which had a sizeable pro-Taiwan faction under the influence of a more established "China Lobby" run by the Kuomintang. The plan, according to the Senate report, instructed Chinese officials in the U.S. to improve their knowledge about members of Congress and increase contacts with its members, the public, and the media. The plan also suggested ways to lobby United States officials.

Over the years, China repeatedly denied that their lobbying efforts involved financial contributions of any kind, e.g., stating "some people and media in the United States speculated... about so-called participation by Chinese individuals in political donations during the U.S. elections. It is sheer fabrication and is intended to slander China. has never, nor will we ever, use money to influence American politics"—a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, May 1998.

Major fund-raising figures

Yah-Lin "Charlie" Trie

The most significant activity by Yah-Lin "Charlie" Trie (崔亞琳) was a $450,000 attempted donation from him to Clinton's legal defense fund (for his impeachment trials) which Trie allegedly delivered in two envelopes each containing several checks and money orders. The fund immediately rejected $70,000 and deposited the remainder, but ordered an investigation of the source. The investigation found that some of the money orders were made out in different names but with the same handwriting, and sequentially numbered. The fund then rejected the donation entirely, and allegedly returned the deposited funds two months after the initial contribution.

Born in Taiwan, Trie emigrated to the U.S. in 1974. He eventually became an American citizen and co-owner of a restaurant in Little Rock, Arkansas. The 1997 special investigation describes Trie as having attempted to develop an international trading business (Daihatsu International Trading Corporation), having maintained or accessed accounts in Little Rock and Washington, D.C., into which Macau-based real estate businessman Ng Lap Seng wired >$1M USD from Macau and Hong Kong accounts, and as having never succeeded in the trading business (based on bank and tax records indicating substantive income only from Ng).

In Little Rock, Trie befriended Clinton, then Governor of Arkansas. In addition to the attempted donation to Clinton's defense fund, Trie and his immediate family donated $220,000 to the DNC which was also later returned. Immediately after the donation to Clinton's defense fund, Trie sent a letter to President Clinton that expressed concern about America's intervention in tensions arising from China's military exercises being conducted near Taiwan. Trie told the President in his letter that war with China was a possibility should U.S. intervention continue:

nce the hard parties of the Chinese military incline to grasp U.S. involvement as foreign intervention, is [sic] U.S. ready to face such challenge... t is highly possible for China to launch real war based on its past behavior in [sic] Sino-Vietnam War and Zhen Bao Tao war with Russia. (Charlie Trie, letter to President Clinton, March 21, 1996)."

After Congressional investigations turned to Trie in late 1996, he left the country for China. Trie returned to the U.S. in 1998 and was convicted and sentenced to three years' probation and four months' home detention for violating federal campaign finance laws by making political contributions in someone else's name and for causing a false statement to be made to the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

Johnny Chung

Born in Taiwan, Johnny Chung went from being the owner of a "blastfaxing" business (an automated system that quickly sends out faxes to thousands of businesses) in California to being in the middle of the Washington, D.C. elite within a couple weeks of his first donations to the Democratic Party. Called a "hustler" by a U.S. National Security Council (NSC) aide, Chung made forty-nine separate visits to the White House between February 1994 and February 1996. One of his purposes in making these trips was to obtain photographs of himself with the Clintons, which he believed would help him to get business in China by giving people the impression that he had connections and influence in Washington—he used a brochure that included at least ten photographs of himself with Hillary Clinton along with a personal note from her. During one of the U.S. Commerce Department trade missions to China, Chung befriended former Chinese Lt. Col. Liu Chaoying, then an executive at China Aerospace International Holdings (中國航天國際控股有限公司), which is the Hong Kong-based subsidiary of the government-controlled CASC (中國航天科技集團公司), China's premier satellite launching company. She is the daughter of former General Liu Huaqing.

Between 1994 and 1996, Chung donated $366,000 to the DNC. Once the truth of this situation was revealed to the public, all of the money was allegedly returned. Chung told federal investigators that $35,000 of the money he donated came from Liu Chaoying and, in turn, China's military intelligence.

Specifically, Chung testified under oath to the U.S. House Committee investigating the issue in May 1999 that he was introduced to Chinese Gen. Ji Shengde, then the head of Chinese military intelligence, by Liu Chaoying. Chung said that Ji told him: "We like your president very much. We would like to see him reelect [sic]. I will give you 300,000 U.S. dollars. You can give it to the president and the Democrat [sic] Party." Both Liu and the Chinese government denied the claims.

Chung was eventually sentenced to five years' probation and community service following an agreement to plea guilty to bank fraud, tax evasion, and two misdemeanor counts of conspiring to violate election law.

John Huang and James Riady

James Riady.

John Huang (pronounced "Hwa"), was another major figure convicted. Born in 1945 in Nanping, Fujian, Huang and his father fled to Taiwan at the end of the Chinese Civil War before he eventually emigrated to the United States in 1969. A former employee of the Indonesian company Lippo Group's Lippo Bank and its owners Mochtar Riady and his son James (whom Huang first met along with Bill Clinton at a financial seminar in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1980), Huang became a key fund-raiser within the DNC in 1995. While there, he raised $3.4 million for the party. Nearly half had to be returned when questions arose regarding their source during later investigations by Congress.

According to U.S. Secret Service logs, Huang visited the White House 78 times while working as a DNC fund-raiser. James Riady visited the White House 20 times (including six personal visits to President Clinton).

Immediately prior to joining the DNC, Huang worked in President Clinton's Commerce Department as deputy assistant secretary for international economic affairs. His position made him responsible for Asia-U.S. trade matters. He was appointed to the position by President Clinton in December 1993. His position at the Commerce Department gave him access to classified intelligence on China. While at the department, it was later learned, Huang met 9 times with Chinese embassy officials.

Huang eventually pleaded guilty to conspiring to reimburse Lippo Group employees' campaign contributions with corporate or foreign funds. James Riady was later convicted of campaign finance violations relating to the same scheme as well, and was sentenced to pay a large fine. Shortly after Riady pledged $1 million in support of then-Governor Clinton's campaign for the presidency, contributions made by Huang had been reimbursed with funds wired from a foreign Lippo Group entity into an account Riady maintained at Lippo Bank and then distributed to Huang in cash. Also, contributions made by Lippo Group entities operating in the United States were reimbursed with wire transfers from foreign Lippo Group entities.

An unclassified U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs report issued in 1998 stated that both James Riady and his father Mochtar had "had a long-term relationship with a Chinese intelligence agency." According to journalist Bob Woodward, details of the relationship came from highly classified intelligence information supplied to the committee by both the CIA and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

The most well-known of John Huang's fund-raisers involved Vice President Al Gore, Maria Hsia, and the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple in California.

Maria Hsia

Taiwan-born Maria Hsia (pronounced "Shya"), a long time fund raiser for Al Gore, California immigration consultant, and business associate of John Huang and James Riady since 1988, facilitated $100,000 in illegal campaign contributions through her efforts at Hsi Lai Temple, a Chinese Buddhist temple associated with Taiwan in Hacienda Heights, California. This money went to the DNC, to the Clinton–Gore campaign, and to U.S. Representative Patrick Kennedy of Rhode Island. After a trial, Hsia was convicted in March 2000.

The Democratic National Committee eventually returned the money donated by the temple's monks and nuns. Twelve nuns and employees of the temple, including temple abbess Venerable Yi Kung (who resigned her post after being subpoenaed), refused to answer questions by pleading the Fifth Amendment when they were subpoenaed to testify before Congress. Two other Buddhist nuns admitted destroying lists of donors and other documents related to the controversy because they felt the information would embarrass the temple. A Temple-commissioned videotape of the fund raiser also went missing and the nuns' attorney claimed it may have been shipped off to Taiwan.

The temple event became particularly controversial because it was attended by Vice President Gore. In an interview on the January 24, 1997, edition of the Today show, Gore said:

I did not know that it was a fund-raiser. But I knew it was a political event, and I knew there were finance people that were going to be present, and so that alone should have told me, 'This is inappropriate and this is a mistake; don't do this.' And I take responsibility for that. It was a mistake.

The Hsi Lai Temple in Hacienda Heights, California

In response, the U.S. Senate Governmental Affairs Committee that investigated the controversy said:

The Vice President's staff ... knew that the temple event was a fundraiser. In March 1996, Deputy Chief of Staff David Strauss had helped arrange a meeting in the White House with the founder of the temple, Hsing Yun—a meeting which Strauss believed would 'lead to a lot of $.' The White House staff repeatedly referred to the event as a 'fundraiser' in internal correspondence, and assigned to it a 'ticket price' of '1,000–5,000 head'.

John Huang's memo to Vice President Gore's assistant Kimberly Tilley specifically mentioned that the temple meeting was a fundraising event. Gore later acknowledged that he had known the visit was "finance-related."

In the U.S., religious organizations enjoy a tax exempt status. Political activity is prohibited for such tax exempt entities. The Senate Governmental Affairs Committee also said they learned that Hsia had served as an "agent" of the PRC government. Hsia denied the claim.

Ted Sioeng

Ted Sioeng, an Indonesian entrepreneur who donated money to both Democrats and Republicans, was the sixth individual whose donations were investigated by the Senate committee. Suspect contributions associated with Sioeng include $250,000 to the DNC and $100,000 to Republican California State Treasurer Matt Fong. Fong returned the money in April 1997.

Sieong sat with Bill Clinton or Al Gore at two fundraising events. Sioeng also joined Fong at a meeting with then Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich in mid-1995. Gingrich called the meeting a "photo op". Gingrich was the guest of honor at a Sioeng-organized luncheon the day after a Sioeng family company gave the $50,000 think-tank donation, solicited by a Gingrich adviser.

Attorney General Janet Reno and the directors of the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency (NSA) told members of the Senate committee they had credible intelligence information indicating Sioeng acted on behalf of China. A spokesman for Sioeng denied the allegations. Sioeng left the country shortly thereafter, and no charges were filed.

Bernard Schwartz

Bernard L. Schwartz CEO of Loral Space & Communications, a satellite communications company, donated over $600,000 to the Democratic Party. Schwartz said he did not expect, need, or receive any special treatment from the Clinton administration as a result of his donations. In 1998 Loral was under investigation for illegally transferring satellite technology to China.

In February 1998 during the time Loral was under investigation, Loral requested Clinton to sign a waiver which would allow Loral to ship satellite technology to China. Clinton's justice department advised against signing the waiver because they believed that a jury wouldn't convict Loral if they received a waiver from Clinton. Clinton did eventually sign the waiver. The U.S space technology received by China may have furthered Beijing's military development of nuclear missiles. In 2002 Loral would later be fined $14 million for its involvement in illegally transferring classified secrets to China.

Investigations

Department of Justice investigation

Attorney General Janet Reno

The Justice Department opened a task force in late 1996 to begin investigating allegations of campaign fundraising abuses by the Clinton/Gore re-election campaign. It expanded its internal investigation to include activities related to President Bill Clinton's legal defense fund in December 1996.

President Clinton announced in February 1997 that he thought there should be a "vigorous" and "thorough" investigation into reports that the People's Republic of China tried to direct financial contributions from overseas sources to the Democratic National Committee. The president stopped short of calling for an independent prosecutor, saying that was the decision of the Justice Department.

"bviously it would be a very serious matter for the United States if any country were to attempt to funnel funds to one of our parties for any reason whatever," President Clinton said.

By July 1997, the administration determined that no evidence of any such thing had yet been proven.

"We have received the relevant briefings," White House Press Secretary Mike McCurry said. "We believe there's no basis for any change in our policy toward China, which is one of engagement."

"I do not know whether it is true or not," President Clinton stated. "Therefore, since I don't know, it can't... and shouldn't affect the larger long-term strategic interests of the American people in our foreign policy."

Members of Congress of both parties reached disparate conclusions. According to The Washington Post, Senator Fred Thompson (a Republican from Tennessee) and chairman of the committee investigating the fundraising controversy, said he believed the Chinese plan targeted presidential and congressional elections while Democratic Senators Joe Lieberman and John Glenn said they believed the evidence showed the Chinese targeted only congressional elections.

Congressional investigations

With regard to their overall efficacy, investigators are on record as having stated that the Congressional investigations were hamstrung due to lack of co-operation of witnesses. Ninety-four people either refused to be questioned, pled the Fifth Amendment, or left the country altogether.

U.S. Sen. Fred Thompson (R-TN)

The U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs held public hearings into the campaign finance issues from July to October 1997. The Committee, chaired by Republican Fred Thompson, adopted a Republican-written final report (the Wikisource referenced and appearing herein) on a straight party-line vote, 8 in favor and 7 opposing, in March 1998. Thompson described the findings as "not any one real big thing" but "a lot of things strung together that paint a real ugly picture." The Democrats published a minority report dissenting with most of the conclusions of the final report, stating the evidence "does not support the conclusion that the China plan was aimed at, or affected, the 1996 presidential election." Considerable acrimony was displayed during the hearings between Thompson and the ranking minority member, Democrat John Glenn, with the public disagreements between the two leaders reaching a level seldom seen in recent years in Congressional committees.

U.S. Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN)

A House investigation, headed by Indiana Republican Dan Burton focused on allegations of campaign finance abuse, including the contributions channeled through Chung, Huang, and Trie. The investigation was lengthy, spanning both the 105th and 106th Congresses, and according to a Democratic report had cost over $7.4 million as of August 31, 1998, making it the most expensive Congressional investigation ever (the Senate Watergate investigation cost $7 million in 1998 dollars).

Norman Ornstein, a Congressional expert at the American Enterprise Institute said in May 1998, "Barring some dramatic change, I think the Burton investigation is going to be remembered as a case study in how not to do a congressional investigation and as a prime example of investigation as farce." In a May 5, 1998, letter to other Republicans on the committee, Burton admitted that "mistakes and omissions were made" in tape transcripts released to the public of phone calls made by Webster Hubbell. A committee investigator who was an advocate of releasing the tapes resigned at Burton's request.

Calls for an independent counsel

FBI Director Louis Freeh

President Clinton's FBI Director Louis Freeh wrote in a 22-page memorandum to then Clinton's critics called of the scandal, nicknamed "Chinagate." Attorney General Janet Reno said in November 1997 that "It is difficult to imagine a more compelling situation for appointing an independent counsel."

In July 1998, the Justice Department's campaign finance task force head, Charles La Bella, sent a report to Janet Reno also recommending she seek an independent counsel to investigate alleged fundraising abuses by Democratic party officials. The media reported that La Bella believed there was clearly an appearance of a conflict of interest by Reno.

Robert Conrad, Jr., who later became head of the task force, called on Reno in Spring 2000 to appoint an independent counsel to look into the fundraising practices of Vice President Gore.

Janet Reno declined all requests:

I try to do one thing: what's right. I am trying to follow the independent counsel statute as it has been framed by Congress. If you had a lower threshold, then any time somebody said 'boo' about a covered person, you'd trigger the independent counsel statute —Janet Reno, December 4, 1997.

A CNN/Time poll taken in May 1998 found 58 percent of Americans felt an independent counsel should have been appointed to investigate the controversy. Thirty-three percent were opposed. The same poll found that 47 percent of Americans believed a quid pro quo existed between the Clinton administration and the PRC government.

Calls for impeachment

Main article: Efforts to impeach Bill Clinton

In 1997 Bob Barr and eighteen other Republicans signed a resolution to impeach Bill Clinton for alleged campaign finance law violations and obstruction of congressional investigations. Anti Clinton activists collected 100,000 signatures supporting his impeachment.

Criticism of investigation

In addition to partisan complaints from Republicans, columnists Charles Krauthammer, William Safire, and Morton Kondracke, as well as a number of FBI agents, suggested the investigations into the fundraising controversies were willfully impeded.

FBI agent Ivian Smith wrote a letter to FBI Director Freeh that expressed "a lack of confidence" in the Justice Department's attorneys regarding the fundraising investigation. He wrote: "I am convinced the team at... leading this investigation is, at best, simply not up to the task... The impression left is the emphasis on how not to prosecute matters, not how to aggressively conduct investigations leading to prosecutions." Smith and three other FBI agents later testified before Congress in late 1999 that Justice Department prosecutors impeded their inquiry. FBI agent Daniel Wehr told Congress that the first head U.S. attorney in the investigation, Laura Ingersoll, told the agents they should "not pursue any matter related to solicitation of funds for access to the president. The reason given was, 'That's the way the American political process works.' I was scandalized by that," Wehr said. The four FBI agents also said that Ingersoll prevented them from executing search warrants to stop destruction of evidence and micromanaged the case beyond all reason.

FBI agents were also denied the opportunity to ask President Clinton and Vice President Gore questions during Justice Department interviews in 1997 and 1998 and were only allowed to take notes. During the interviews, neither Clinton nor Gore were asked any questions about fund-raisers John Huang and James Riady, nor the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple fundraising event led by Maria Hsia and attended by Huang and Ted Sioeng.

See also

References

  1. Miller, Alan C., "Democrats Return Illegal Contribution" Archived September 12, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, Los Angeles Times, September 21, 1996
  2. Woodward, Bob and Duffy, Brian, "Chinese Embassy Role In Contributions Probed" Archived August 18, 2018, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, February 13, 1997
  3. Ross, Robert S.,"The 1995–1996 Taiwan Strait Confrontation: Coercion, Credibility, and Use of Force" Archived 2006-02-26 at the Wayback Machine, International Security, 25:2, pp. 87–123, Fall 2000, Retrieved: April 14, 2006 (PDF file)
  4. ^ Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1998). "Volume 4 of 6, Minority Views of Senators Glenn, Levin, Lieberman, Akaka, Durbin, Torricelli, and Cleland, Part 1. Foreign Influence, Chapter 2, The China Plan" in Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Final Report (Senate Report 105-167, March 10, 1998, 105th Congress, 2d Session), see Archived November 13, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, and Archived March 9, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, accessed 6 October 2015. Note, this is part of the full citation and an alternate web location of the WikiSource, Archived October 7, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, given above.
  5. Pomfret, John, "China Denies Contribution Charges" Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, May 20, 1998
  6. 《調查》第28輯: 王健林一語道破天機 習家姐姐財富的流轉. 調查雜誌社. November 16, 2015. p. PT105. ISBN 9781681820330.
  7. Campaign Finance Key Player: Yah Lin 'Charlie' Trie Archived April 5, 2017, at Archive-It Washington Post, March 4, 1998
  8. ^ Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1998). "Summary of Findings" (Chapter 3), "The China Connection: Summary of Committee's Findings Relating to the Effort of the People's Republic of China to Influence U.S. Policies and Elections" (Chapter 18), and "Charlie Trie's Contributions to the Presidential Legal Expense Trust (Chapter 20), in Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Final Report (Senate Report 105-167, March 10, 1998, 105th Congress, 2d Session), see Archived November 13, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Archived July 9, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, Archived October 12, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, and Archived July 9, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, accessed 6 October 2015. Note, this is the full citation and an alternate web location of the WikiSource, Archived October 7, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, given above.
  9. "Fund-raiser Charlie Trie pleads guilty under plea agreement". CNN. May 21, 1999. Archived from the original on August 5, 2006.
  10. ^ Jackson, David and Sun, Lena H., "Liu's Deals With Chung: An Intercontinental Puzzle" Archived August 18, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, May 24, 1998
  11. Isikoff, Michael (February 9, 2004). "Cash and Kerry". Newsweek. Archived from the original on February 4, 2013. Retrieved October 7, 2011.
  12. Bunting, Glenn F.; Alan C. Miller; Rich Connell (November 28, 1996). "Donor Enjoyed Broad Access to White House". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on March 9, 2012. Retrieved October 7, 2011.
  13. Johnston, David, "Committee Told Of Beijing Cash For Democrats " Archived September 12, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, May 12, 1999
  14. "Chinese Aerospace Official Denies Giving To Dems". CNN. May 21, 1998. Archived from the original on May 24, 2008.
  15. ^ "James Riady Pleads Guilty" Archived 2005-11-29 at the Wayback Machine, Department of Justice, press release, January 11, 2001, Retrieved: April 14, 2006
  16. "Campaign Finance Key Player: John Huang" Archived August 11, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, July 27, 1997
  17. "The Democratic Fund-Raising Flap: Timeline" Archived August 18, 2005, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, July 1, 1997
  18. "The Democratic Fund-Raising Flap: Cast of Characters" Archived September 9, 2005, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, July 1, 1997
  19. "Highlights of U.S. report on alleged China spying" Archived February 16, 2006, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, May 25, 1999
  20. "Former Democratic fund-raiser John Huang pleads guilty" Archived September 29, 2005, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, Aug. 12, 1999
  21. Woodward, Bob, "Findings Link Clinton Allies to Chinese Intelligence" Archived August 2, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, Feb. 10, 1998
  22. Eskenazi, Michael, "For both Gore and GOP, a guilty verdict to watch", CNN.com, March 3, 2000 Archived April 3, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  23. Lewis, Neil A. (February 8, 2000). "Veteran Gore Fund-Raiser Goes on Trial". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 11, 2012. Retrieved January 3, 2009. The real donors were ineligible to give the money either because the amount of their donations exceeded legal limits or they were foreign nationals who were prohibited from giving campaign contributions.
  24. ^ Abse, Nathan, "A Look at the 94 Who Aren't Talking" Archived August 10, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, June 9, 1998
  25. "Buddhist Nuns Admit Destroying Documents". CNN. September 4, 1997. Archived from the original on April 24, 2009.
  26. "Gore Admits Temple Fund-Raiser Was A 'Mistake'". CNN. January 24, 1997. Archived from the original on April 24, 2009.
  27. ^ "Senate Governmental Affairs Committee's Majority Report Executive Summary" Archived September 4, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, March 8, 1998
  28. Huang, John, "Memo for Kim Tilley" Archived February 26, 2006, at the Wayback Machine, April 11, 1996
  29. Lewis, Neil A. (March 3, 2000). "THE 2000 CAMPAIGN: CAMPAIGN FINANCE; Longtime Fund-Raiser for Gore Convicted in Donation Scheme". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 11, 2012. Retrieved January 3, 2009.
  30. Jacobs, Paul; Morain, Dan (April 23, 1997). "Fong Returns $100,000 in Gifts". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved March 10, 2015.
  31. "FBI Probes Businessman As Possible Chinese Agent". CNN. May 12, 1997. Archived from the original on April 23, 2009.
  32. "Response To Majority Report". Fas.org. Archived from the original on June 4, 2011. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
  33. Woodward, Bob and Duffy, Brian "Senate Panel Is Briefed on China Probe Figure" Archived August 11, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, September 12, 1997
  34. Seper, Jerry; Gertz, Bill (March 18, 2009). "Commerce pick tied to China cash". The Washington Times. Archived from the original on January 1, 2015. Retrieved December 27, 2014.
  35. "Justice May Probe Links Between China Policy, Campaign Cash - May 17, 1998". www.cnn.com. Retrieved January 27, 2022.
  36. "washingtonpost.com: Campaign Finance Special Report". www.washingtonpost.com. Retrieved January 27, 2022.
  37. "Red Face Over China - June 1, 1998". www.cnn.com. Retrieved January 27, 2022.
  38. "Red Face Over China - June 1, 1998". www.cnn.com. Retrieved January 27, 2022.
  39. "Clinton Defends China Satellite Waiver - May 22, 1998". www.cnn.com. Retrieved January 27, 2022.
  40. "Red Face Over China - June 1, 1998". www.cnn.com. Retrieved January 27, 2022.
  41. ^ Mintz, John (January 1, 2003). "2 U.S. space giants accused of aiding China / Hughes, Boeing allegedly gave away missile technology illegally". SFGATE. Retrieved January 27, 2022.
  42. "Washingtonpost.com: Panel Faults Space Aid to China". www.washingtonpost.com. Retrieved January 27, 2022.
  43. "Justice To Expand Inquiry To Clinton's Legal Fund" Archived September 9, 2005, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, December 19, 1996
  44. "Clinton Wants Probe Of Possible Chinese Involvement" Archived December 15, 2004, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, February 13, 1997
  45. ^ Harris, John F., "White House Unswayed By China Allegations" Archived August 2, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, July 20, 1997
  46. Remarks by Senator Fred Thompson before the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, October 8, 1997
  47. "Campaign Finance Key Player: John Glenn Archived September 28, 2016, at the Wayback Machine" (March 4, 1998) The Washington Post
  48. ^ Crowley, Candy (1998) Thompson Committee Wraps Up Its Work Archived December 12, 2007, at the Wayback Machine CNN (online, March 5), accessed 5 October 2015.
  49. Rosenbaum, David E. (1997). "Campaign Finance: The Hearings; Anger Flares as Focus Shifts to Campaign Remedies," Archived September 7, 2017, at the Wayback Machine The New York Times (online, September 24), accessed 6 November 2015.
  50. Cost of Congressional Campaign Finance Investigations to the U.S. Taxpayer, Minority Report: page 8 Archived 2006-01-27 at the Wayback Machine, U.S. House of Representatives, Retrieved: April 14, 2006
  51. Lacey, Marc, "House Probe of Campaign Fund-Raising Uncovers Little, Piles Up Partisan Ill Will" Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, Los Angeles Times, May 2, 1998
  52. "Burton Apologizes In Hubbell Tapes Furor: House committee investigator quits; Democrats want Burton out, CNN, May 8, 1998 Archived November 19, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  53. Yuwu Song, ed., Encyclopedia of Chinese-American Relations (McFarland, 2009) p 63.
  54. Lewis, Neil A., "Freeh Says Reno Clearly Misread Prosecutor Law", The New York Times, June 16, 1998
  55. Thomas, Pierre, "Reno Aide Recommends Independent Campaign Finance Probe" Archived February 10, 2006, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, July 23, 1998
  56. Politics and Prosecution Discussion, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, transcript, PBS, August 4, 1998, Retrieved: April 14, 2006 Archived May 16, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  57. Fund-raising Investigation Discussion, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, transcript, PBS, June 23, 2000, Retrieved: April 14, 2006 Archived October 12, 2004, at the Wayback Machine
  58. "Reno Defends Independent Counsel Decision" Archived May 17, 2006, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, December 4, 1997
  59. Holland, Keating, "Poll: Independent Counsel Should Investigate China Policy Decisions" Archived January 2, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, May 20, 1998
  60. "17 Nov 1997, Page 3 - Asheville Citizen-Times at Newspapers.com". Newspapers.com. Retrieved November 21, 2021.
  61. "5 Dec 1997, Page 20 - Standard-Speaker at Newspapers.com". Newspapers.com. Retrieved November 21, 2021.
  62. Krauthammer, Charles, "Reno's Humiliation" Archived April 17, 2017, at the Wayback Machine (Opinion), The Washington Post, October 10, 1997
  63. Safire, William, "Those Chinese Agents" (Opinion), The New York Times, October 7, 1999
  64. Kondracke, Morton, "GOP must launch new probe of Chinagate" Archived August 28, 2005, at the Wayback Machine (Opinion), Jewish World Review, August 9, 1999
  65. "FBI agents criticize Justice Department" Archived October 6, 2001, at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press, September 22, 1999
  66. "Justice's Clinton, Gore inquiry criticized" Archived July 4, 2004, at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press, December 16, 1999

Further reading

  • Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1998). E.g., "Summary of Findings" (Chapter 3), "The China Connection: Summary of Committee's Findings Relating to the Effort of the People's Republic of China to Influence U.S. Policies and Elections" (Chapter 18), and "Charlie Trie's Contributions to the Presidential Legal Expense Trust (Chapter 20), in Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Final Report (Senate Report 105-167, March 10, 1998, 105th Congress, 2d Session), see , , , and , accessed 6 October 2015. Note, this is the full citation and an alternate web location of the WikiSource, , given above.
  • Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1998). E.g., "Volume 4 of 6, Minority Views of Senators Glenn, Levin, Lieberman, Akaka, Durbin, Torricelli, and Cleland, Part 1. Foreign Influence, Chapter 2, The China Plan" in Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Final Report (Senate Report 105-167, March 10, 1998, 105th Congress, 2d Session), see , and , accessed 6 October 2015. Note, this is part of the full citation and an alternative web location of the WikiSource, , given above.

External links


Bill Clinton
Presidency
(timeline)


Life and
legacy
Speeches
Elections
U.S. House
Gubernatorial
Presidential
Books
Namesakes
Popular
culture
Family
Categories: