| Revision as of 05:11, 4 January 2011 editHalfShadow (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers34,876 editsm Reverted edits by Alison (talk) to last version by MuZemike← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:44, 5 January 2025 edit undoGerda Arendt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers382,336 edits →Precious anniversary: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <span style="font-size: x-large;">Or: The War Room</span> | |||
| '''''Gentlemen, you can't ] in here, this is the War Room!''''' | |||
| {| cellpadding="5" cellspacing="10" style="background:#52A629; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px;" | |||
| |colspan="2" style="background-color: #d0f0c0; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; padding: 1em;"| | |||
| ⚫ | {{User:MuZemike/ |
||
| |- | |||
| | style="background-color: #d0f0c0; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; padding: 1em;" valign="top"| | |||
| <center><big>'''Ground rules'''</big> | |||
| #Post at the bottom of the page. | |||
| #Sign your comments at the end with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>), which automatically generates your username and date posted. | |||
| #I will respond to queries here, so please watch this page. | |||
| #''']''' and chances are I will be nice back. | |||
| |- | |||
| | style="background-color: #d0f0c0; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; padding: 1em;" valign="top"| | |||
| {{TOCleft}} | |||
| {{archive box|auto=long|style=background-color: #d0f0c0; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; font-size=large;|bot=MiszaBot III|age=3}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 11 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = |
|minthreadsleft = 5 | ||
| |algo = old(72h) | |algo = old(72h) | ||
| |archive = User talk:MuZemike/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:MuZemike/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| ⚫ | {{User:MuZemike/Talkheader}} | ||
| |- | |||
| | style="background-color: #d0f0c0; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; padding: 1em;" valign="top" | | |||
| == ] == | |||
| From looking at the edit history at ], you can see that this vandal continues, i guess he has gone over 60 socks now. Also there, even the anon addresses are his, except the one that starts with an "8". Please block both accounts, and delete the article if you see it fit, these "users" have to learn the hard way. | |||
| This chap has been here for roughly the same time as i (four years), and here's the only time he talked to anyone (please see here http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Satori_Son#Deleted_pages). Other than that, no talks, no summaries, no nothing! People, including admins, tell him to stop creating new accounts, delete articles he starts, nevermind! He creates them again and signs up again after his block, i see he will not get tired, well neither will i! P.S. In ], i found this ], only one contribution (here http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Asda09), but strikingly similar to his other accounts (the numbers mainly), is there a possibility to find out if this IP also edits from England? Thanks in advance. | |||
| Attentively, happy new year - --] (]) 18:19, 30 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I've blocked both accounts as socks of Pararubbas; I couldn't find any sleepers, though. And no, I am afraid I would not be able to tell you his location (unless you know that he has edited anonymously; you can find from his IPs), as that would violate policy on my part if I did. Thank you, –] 22:13, 30 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *Thank you very much Mike, indeed. But you missed ], that's another sock. Boy oh boy, kind of confusing... Cheers - --] (]) 01:59, 31 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == inre ] == | |||
| Was it an ] sockpuppet trying to deceive other editors, disrupt discussions, distort consensus, avoid sanctions, or otherwise violate community standards? Or was it a ] simply doing similar work? ''']''' '']'' 18:57, 30 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Should be the former. I am not seeing how that one blocked account would be a legit alternate account, given that both were editing exactly the same article at the same time. Moreover, judging from , this looks like some organization or something, and would have been blocked anyways as a username violation. In any case, if ] was not blocked, then that's fine, though I would recommend some sort of warning and/or a question asking about that other account. –] 22:24, 30 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Might be, perhaps... but is it really? The edit diff you shared might ] like a declaration of COI, rather than an attempt at deception... and the ] account made only one ''very'' minor edit to the Jeff Unaegbu article, ] out of rank newness and lack of understanding, and no others. If the Jeff Unaegbu account is indeed Unaegbu, he should be made aware of ], but if it is '''not''' Unaegbu he should be counselled to immediately request an account namechange, and to not use any alternate accounts, even if ]. I read ] and ]... which led me to ]... and the slightly confusing ] and more so ]... and these change actions require a bureaucrat. I think if counseled, and walked through the procedure, the user will be amenable. As to why I am questioning this...? Well, we have far too few editors who are even willing to concern themselves with topic related to ], and so articles on Nigerian writers and artists are under-represented in the project... and per ] we should really try to encourage editors interested in expanding that field. And I note that ] was never welcomed with the standard template that offers advice on how to work within the community. I'll rectify that immediately. ''']''' '']'' 07:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == DYK for Common Sense Media == | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |style = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that ''']''' protested the ]'s rating downgrade of a revised version of '']'' from "Adults Only" to "Mature", since that version was still banned in the UK?'' You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and add it to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }} The penultimate day of the year. Thank you from the DYK project ] (]) 20:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| == ANI notification == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 07:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. <font face="Segoe script">]]</font> 17:25, 31 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 13:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello, I whould like to file an SockPupet Investigation report but the page was protected by you == | |||
| == Welcome to the 2011 ]! == | |||
| I would like the SockpupetTeam to investigate the SPA which is @] | |||
| Hello, happy new year and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found ''']''' and instructions of how to update the page can be found ] and on the submissions' page itself. From the submissions' page, a bot will update the main scoresheet. Our rules have been very slightly updated from last year; the full rules can be found ]. Please remember that you can only receive points for content on which you have done significant work in 2011; nominations of work from last year and "drive-by" nominations will not be awarded points. Signups are going to remain open through January, so if you know of anyone who would like to take part, please direct them to ]. The judges can be contacted on the ], on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name to ]. Good luck! ] and ] 12:58, 1 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| this page was protected by you so I am Unable to Do this Change By myself. | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0098 --> | |||
| are you willing to assist me with this change and investigation of this single purpose account? ] (]) 19:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Stevedimples == | |||
| :Sorry, but I no longer actively work on ]. --] 14:46, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| I had him down as a sock of Brucejenner because of ] and ] and the ... errm ... 'creative' usernames, but one thing for certain is that there's a whole bunch of {{confirmed}} socks under there =) - ] <sup>]</sup> 02:45, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Precious anniversary == | |||
| :Well, one of the accounts suggests a connection to ], but it was only tagged as a ''suspected'' sock. There was also the lack of "faggotry" in the edits. –] 02:47, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Four}} | |||
| --] (]) 10:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:44, 5 January 2025
Credit: Diego Delso
Subpages: Articles worked on · Good article reviews · GA standards · common.css · common.js
Archives as of the dates listed (250KB or more to load; threads more than 3 days to be archived by bot or earlier upon personal discretion; displayed in order of date of last thread):
- 2009-04-29 · 2009-10-17 · 2010-01-09 · 2010-04-27 · 2010-08-12 · 2010-11-21 · 2010-03-10 · 2011-08-07 · 2012-01-28 · 2012-09-17 · present
Good article reassessment for Kingdom of Sicily
Kingdom of Sicily has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Wild Arms (video game)
Wild Arms (video game) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I whould like to file an SockPupet Investigation report but the page was protected by you
I would like the SockpupetTeam to investigate the SPA which is @M.Bitton this page was protected by you so I am Unable to Do this Change By myself.
are you willing to assist me with this change and investigation of this single purpose account? 109.64.104.168 (talk) 19:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I no longer actively work on WP:SPI. --MuZemike 14:46, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Four years! |
|---|