| Revision as of 19:51, 5 February 2011 editJeffro77 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,602 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:46, 25 August 2024 edit undoClovermoss (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators31,265 edits →A barnstar for you!: ReplyTag: Reply | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{ |
{{User_talk:Jeffro77/Year tabs|This=1}} | ||
| | |||
| {{User_talk:Jeffro77/tabs|This=1}} | |||
| {{User_talk}} | |||
| <!--TOC--> | <!--TOC--> | ||
| <div style="float:right; padding-left: |
<div style="float:right; padding-left:4px; padding-top:4px;"> | ||
| {| style="text-align:center; border:1px solid #000000; background-color:#FFC000; |
{| style="text-align:center; border:1px solid #000000; background-color:#FFC000; font-family: Arial" | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| | | | | ||
| <div style="border:1px solid #000000; background: #fff; border-right:2px solid #365F91; border-bottom:2px solid #365F91; text-align: center; padding:1px; float:right; line-height: 1.3; margin-right: 1px;"> | <div style="border:1px solid #000000; background: #fff; border-right:2px solid #365F91; border-bottom:2px solid #365F91; text-align: center; padding:1px; float:right; line-height: 1.3; margin-right: 1px;"> | ||
| <center> | <div class="center"> | ||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| </ |
</div> | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| <!--End TOC--> | <!--End TOC--> | ||
| == Tables == | |||
| Hello, it's me, Junkönig. I wanted to let you know that I agree with you that two tables at the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society article are not necessary. However, I consider the new one more orderly. And you can see the length of tenures and notable positions below. So, I am in favour of including just the new one instead of both or Just the old one. ] <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added 19:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Re: Intellectual Honesty == | |||
| :Just the one table is good. I'm happy with the new replacement table. Thanks. :)--] <span style="padding:2px 4px;background-color:#eee;color:#000;border:1px solid #000;font-size:12px;border-radius:4px;">]</span> 09:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I would advise that you take this up at ], as that would be the more appropriate venue to deal with this guy's constant reverting of your redirect. I will certainly offer an opinion in that discussion if you open it. --<span style="border:1px solid #63B8FF; font-weight:bold; color:#23238E; background-color:#D0E7FF;"> ] <sub> ] ] </sub> </span> 21:00, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks. I'll let you know if it comes up. The editor appears not to have been active since August, but has had lengthy periods of inactivity before.--] (]) 22:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| == Conservopedia == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ], to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
| The discussion will take place at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| Please god tell me you've read some of the stuff on Conservopedia.....I was crying I was laughing so hard at the idiocy of the whole site. I even created (using a simple user-box creator) a special userbox for my user page. Wow. {{Userbox | border-c=#000000 | border-s=1| id-c=#666666| id-s=12| id-fc=#FFFFFF| id-op=| info-c=#777777| info-s=8| info-fc=#FFFFFF| info-lh=1.2em| info-op=| id=Conservopedia is Insane| info=This user believes that Conservopedia is Insane, with a capital "I".}} {{clear}} | |||
| ] (]) 23:09, 9 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
| :Never heard of it. Just looking at the home page—their 'article of the month' claims links between atheism and obesity—the degree of bias and ad hominem would drive me crazy if I looked much further.--] (]) 08:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| == Founding date of Bible Student Movement == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| Hello! Hoping you are well. AuthorityTam has initiated a discussion on the date for the founding of the Bible Student movement. It is located on the Talk page of said article. It came about as a result of my changing the date on the JW infobox from 1876 to 1879. AuthorityTam disputes the change. I would greatly appreciate your take on this matter. ] (]) 22:13, 10 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Copyeditor's Barnstar''' | |||
| == Wondering == | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I appreciate your diligence in checking edits made to JW articles (especially mine!). In a topic area with few contributors, your dedication shines through. ] ] 22:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I was just wondering if you'd take a look at this discussion and give your opinion on it. It is my belief that this information is important to the history of the sketch. http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Celebrity_Jeopardy!_(Saturday_Night_Live)#Recent_Edits ] (]) 21:40, 19 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :I have no opinion.--] (]) 22:28, 19 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==Discussion invite== | |||
| Hi, i invite you to a dicussion. . Thanks ] (]) 16:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ===Review=== | |||
| Hey, i have just cleaned up the ] article which you voted for deletion. Do you still maintain your original position? ] (]) 03:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :My position has not changed. Most of the refs are still personal websites, along with some news articles about Wood's arrest along with other anti-Islamic protesters. I therefore do not believe that the person is sufficiently notable to warrant an article.--] (]) 08:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Working With Each Other == | |||
| :Thanks. I also appreciate the change of the section heading away from the vague classification of 'persecution'.--] <span style="padding:2px 4px;background-color:#eee;color:#000;border:1px solid #000;font-size:12px;border-radius:4px;">]</span> 22:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I would really like to work with you rather than against you. We seem to have had a few tussles here and there and frankly they aren't necessary. It would be great if we could try to respect each other as knowledgeable and respect the others edits. It really frustrates me when you completely refactor my edits, and you seem to do it so frequently that it makes me feel my edits have no value "because Jeffro is just going to delete it or change it." I'll make an edit, add a reference and can often predict how it will be changed even though I've tried to be careful and precise in the wording. It puts you in a position over me (authority) rather than beside me (equal). I know JW and Bible Student history like the back of my hand, and perhaps you do too. But we've both been on Misplaced Pages for many years (2004 for me) and should by now know how to work together. It's possible that the conflict comes from similar personalities. But I'm trying to be a peace-maker here and hopefully it will be taken in that spirit. ] (]) 20:34, 23 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::It's something I had considered doing for awhile but the recent content about Norway has definitely convinced me that it is a good idea. ] ] 00:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :There have always been specific reasons for my edits, and you are always welcome to discuss any particular edit. Concern about your inherent conflict of interest has been raised in the past, and your recognition of "how will be changed" suggests you know at some level where your edits contain or imply an element of bias. However, when I check my Watchlist, I edit what I consider to be specific problems with regard to either style, presentation or content. I don't simply make changes simply on the basis that they were made by any particular editor.--] (]) 07:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:46, 25 August 2024
Current 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023Hello, welcome to my talk page!
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
Tables
Hello, it's me, Junkönig. I wanted to let you know that I agree with you that two tables at the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society article are not necessary. However, I consider the new one more orderly. And you can see the length of tenures and notable positions below. So, I am in favour of including just the new one instead of both or Just the old one. User:Junkönig — Preceding undated comment added 19:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Just the one table is good. I'm happy with the new replacement table. Thanks. :)--Jeffro77 Talk 09:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Watch Tower Society publications for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Watch Tower Society publications, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Watch Tower Society publications (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar |
| I appreciate your diligence in checking edits made to JW articles (especially mine!). In a topic area with few contributors, your dedication shines through. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 22:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC) |
- Thanks. I also appreciate the change of the section heading away from the vague classification of 'persecution'.--Jeffro77 Talk 22:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- It's something I had considered doing for awhile but the recent content about Norway has definitely convinced me that it is a good idea. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 00:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)