Misplaced Pages

English people: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:39, 9 February 2011 editCordless Larry (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators56,584 edits Current national identity: Original source← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:37, 5 January 2025 edit undo89.243.177.82 (talk) More people identified as British in the UK 2021 Census for England and Wales, although it may be due to a change to question structure in the census itself. First edit so it may be done incorrectly. 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Ethnic group native to England}}
{{Redirect|Englishman}}
{{hatnote group|
{{About|the English as a nation and an ethnic group|information on the population of ]|Demography of England}}
{{Other uses|English (disambiguation)}} {{About||other uses|Demographics of England|and|English-speaking world|and|Englishman (disambiguation)|and|The English (TV series){{!}}''The English'' (TV series)}}
{{Redirect|English nation|the country of the United Kingdom|England}}
{{Use British English|date=December 2010}}
{{Redirect|Englander|the surname|Englander (surname)}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2010}}
}}
{{sprotect2}}
{{Use British English|date=November 2018}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2020}}
{{Infobox ethnic group
| group = English people
| native_name =
| native_name_lang =
| flag =
| flag_caption =
| population =
| popplace = United Kingdom: <br />37.6 million in<br />] and ] (2011)<ref>{{Cite web |title=Ethnicity and National Identity in England and Wales |publisher=] |url=https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/ethnicity/articles/ethnicityandnationalidentityinenglandandwales/2012-12-11 |date=11 December 2012 |access-date=21 February 2022 |website=www.ons.gov.uk |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220121012603/https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/ethnicity/articles/ethnicityandnationalidentityinenglandandwales/2012-12-11 |archive-date=21 January 2022 |quote=The 2011 England and Wales census reports that in England and Wales 32.4 million people associated themselves with an English identity alone and 37.6 million identified themselves with an English identity either on its own or combined with other identities, being 57.7% and 67.1% respectively of the population of England and Wales.}}</ref>
| tablehdr = ''Significant ] in''
<!---
Note to editors: If you wish to change the numbers or add a country to this section, PLEASE CITE SOURCES (i.e. use the ref1, ref2, etc parameters)
---->
| region1 = United States
| pop1 = ]
| ref1 = <ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2023/10/2020-census-dhc-a-white-population.html|title=English Most Common Race or Ethnicity in 2020 Census|publisher=]|date= October 10, 2023|access-date=October 21, 2023}}</ref> (2020){{sup|a}}
| region3 = Australia
| pop3 = ]
| ref3 = <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.abs.gov.au/census/find-census-data/quickstats/2021/AUS|title=2021 Australia, Census All persons QuickStats &#124; Australian Bureau of Statistics|website=www.abs.gov.au}}</ref> (2021){{sup|b}}
| region4 = Canada
| pop4 = ]
| ref4 = <ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/details/page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=PR&Code1=01&Geo2=&Code2=&SearchText=Canada&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR=01&B1=All&TABID=1&type=0#fnb95-ref |title=Census Profile, 2016 Census |website=] |date=8 February 2017 |access-date=14 December 2019 |archive-date=8 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308142033/https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/details/page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=PR&Code1=01&Geo2=&Code2=&SearchText=Canada&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR=01&B1=All&TABID=1&type=0#fnb95-ref |url-status=live}}</ref> (2016){{sup|c}}
| region5 = New Zealand
| pop5 = ]
| ref5 = <ref name="results">{{cite web|url=https://www.stats.govt.nz/information-releases/2018-census-population-and-dwelling-counts|title=2018 Census population and dwelling counts|website=Stats NZ|date=23 Sep 2019|access-date=5 January 2021|df=dmy-all}}</ref> (2018){{sup|e}}


| region6 = South Africa
{{Infobox Ethnic group
| pop6 = ]
|group = English people
| ref6 = <ref name="cib11">{{cite book |title=Census 2011: Census in brief |url=https://www.statssa.gov.za/census/census_2011/census_products/Census_2011_Census_in_brief.pdf |page=26 |publisher=Statistics South Africa |location=Pretoria |year=2012 |isbn=978-0-621-41388-5 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150513171240/https://www.statssa.gov.za/census/census_2011/census_products/Census_2011_Census_in_brief.pdf |archive-date=13 May 2015 |url-status=live}} The number of people who described themselves as white in terms of population group and specified their first language as English in South Africa's 2011 Census was 1,603,575. The total white population with a first language specified was 4,461,409 and the total population was 51,770,560.</ref> (2011){{sup|d}}
|image = ]
| languages = ], ]
|caption=
| religions = ], traditionally ], but also ]s and ] (see ]), as well as other ]; also ] (see ]); ] (see ]); ], ], and other faiths (see ])
1<sup>st</sup> row: ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]
| footnotes = {{sup|a}} ], {{sup|b}} ], {{sup|c}} ], {{sup|d}} ], {{sup|e}} ], {{sup|f}} ]
| related = {{hlist| other ] | ] |]}}
}}
{{English people}}
{{Culture of England}}
{{Culture of the United Kingdom}}


The '''English people''' are an ] and ] native to ], who speak the ], a ] language, and share a common ancestry, history, and culture.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Cole |first=Jeffrey |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Wlth0GRi0N0C&q=english+ethnic&pg=PA117 |title=Ethnic Groups of Europe: An Encyclopedia |date=2011 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-59884-302-6 |language=en |access-date=6 July 2021 |archive-date=15 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210815112238/https://books.google.com/books?id=Wlth0GRi0N0C&q=english+ethnic&pg=PA117 |url-status=live |via=]}}</ref> The English identity began with the ], when they were known as the {{lang|ang|Angelcynn}}, meaning race or tribe of the ]. Their ] is derived from the Angles, one of the ] who invaded ] around the 5th century AD.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=English |title=English |website=Online Etymology Dictionary |publisher=Etymonline.com |access-date=8 July 2011 |archive-date=20 April 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120420193621/http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=English |url-status=live}}</ref>
2<sup>nd</sup> row: ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]


The English largely descend from two main historical population groups: the West Germanic tribes, including the Angles, ], and ] who settled in ] following the withdrawal of the ], and the ] ] who already lived there.<ref name="auto">{{cite journal |title=The fine scale genetic structure of the British population |first1=Stephen |last1=Leslie |first2=Bruce |last2=Winney |first3=Garrett |last3=Hellenthal |first4=Dan |last4=Davison |first5=Abdelhamid |last5=Boumertit |first6=Tammy |last6=Day |first7=Katarzyna |last7=Hutnik |first8=Ellen C. |last8=Royrvik |first9=Barry |last9=Cunliffe |first10=Daniel J. |last10=Lawson |first11=Daniel |last11=Falush |first12=Colin |last12=Freeman |first13=Matti |last13=Pirinen |first14=Simon |last14=Myers |first15=Mark |last15=Robinson |first16=Peter |last16=Donnelly |first17=Walter |last17=Bodmer |date=19 March 2015 |journal=] |volume=519 |issue=7543 |pages=309–314|doi=10.1038/nature14230 |pmid=25788095 |pmc=4632200 |bibcode=2015Natur.519..309.}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Iron Age and Anglo-Saxon genomes from East England reveal British migration history |first1=Stephan |last1=Schiffels |first2=Wolfgang |last2=Haak |first3=Pirita |last3=Paajanen |first4=Bastien |last4=Llamas |first5=Elizabeth |last5=Popescu |first6=Louise |last6=Loe |first7=Rachel |last7=Clarke |first8=Alice |last8=Lyons |first9=Richard |last9=Mortimer |first10=Duncan |last10=Sayer |first11=Chris |last11=Tyler-Smith |first12=Alan |last12=Cooper |first13=Richard |last13=Durbin |date=19 January 2016 |journal=] |volume=7 |pages=10408 |doi=10.1038/ncomms10408 |pmid=26783965 |pmc=4735688 |bibcode=2016NatCo...710408S}}</ref><ref name="auto5">Martiniano, R., Caffell, A., Holst, M. et al. "Genomic signals of migration and continuity in Britain before the Anglo-Saxons". ''Nat Commun'' 7, 10326 (2016). {{doi|10.1038/ncomms10326}} {{Cite journal |last1=Martiniano |first1=Rui |last2=Caffell |first2=Anwen |last3=Holst |first3=Malin |author-link3=Malin Holst |last4=Hunter-Mann |first4=Kurt |last5=Montgomery |first5=Janet |last6=Müldner |first6=Gundula |last7=McLaughlin |first7=Russell L. |last8=Teasdale |first8=Matthew D. |last9=Van Rheenen |first9=Wouter |last10=Veldink |first10=Jan H. |last11=Van Den Berg |first11=L. H. |last12=Hardiman |first12=Orla |last13=Carroll |first13=Maureen |last14=Roskams |first14=Steve |last15=Oxley |first15=John |date=19 January 2016 |title=Genomic signals of migration and continuity in Britain before the Anglo-Saxons |journal=Nature Communications |volume=7 |issue=1 |page=10326 |bibcode=2016NatCo...710326M |doi=10.1038/ncomms10326 |pmc=4735653 |pmid=26783717 |last16=Morgan |first16=Colleen |last17=Thomas |first17=Mark G. |last18=Barnes |first18=Ian |last19=McDonnell |first19=Christine |last20=Collins |first20=Matthew J. |last21=Bradley |first21=Daniel G.}}</ref><ref>Michael E. Weale, Deborah A. Weiss, Rolf F. Jager, Neil Bradman, Mark G. Thomas, Y "Chromosome Evidence for Anglo-Saxon Mass Migration", ''Molecular Biology and Evolution'', Volume 19, Issue 7, July 2002, pp. 1008–1021, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004160 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220221140807/https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/19/7/1008/1068561 |date=21 February 2022}}</ref> Collectively known as the ], they founded what was to become the ] by the 10th century, in response to the ] of ] and other ] that began in the late 9th century.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Brix |first=Lise |date=20 February 2017 |title=New study reignites debate over Viking settlements in England |url=https://sciencenordic.com/ancient-dna-denmark-videnskabdk/new-study-reignites-debate-over-viking-settlements-in-england/1442782 |access-date=8 May 2022 |website=sciencenordic.com |language=nb-no}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Kershaw |first1=Jane |last2=Røyrvik |first2=Ellen C. |date=December 2016 |title=The 'People of the British Isles' project and Viking settlement in England |journal=] |language=en |volume=90 |issue=354 |pages=1670–1680 |doi=10.15184/aqy.2016.193 |s2cid=52266574 |issn=0003-598X|doi-access=free }}</ref> This was followed by the ] and limited settlement of ] in England in the late 11th century and a sizeable number of ] who emigrated between the 16th and 18th centuries.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2019-08-31 |title=Huguenots {{!}} The History of London |url=https://www.thehistoryoflondon.co.uk/huguenots/ |access-date=2023-12-31 |website=www.thehistoryoflondon.co.uk |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref name=campbell10>Campbell. ''The Anglo-Saxon State''. p. 10</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Ward-Perkins |first1=Bryan |year=2000 |title=Why did the Anglo-Saxons not become more British?|journal=] |volume=115 |issue=462 |pages=513–533 |doi=10.1093/ehr/115.462.513 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>Hills, C. (2003) ''Origins of the English'' Duckworth, London. {{ISBN|0-7156-3191-8}}, p. 67</ref><ref name="auto"/><ref name="Higham, Nicholas J. 2013. p7-19">Higham, Nicholas J., and Martin J. Ryan. ''The Anglo-Saxon World''. Yale University Press, 2013. pp. 7–19</ref> Some definitions of English people include, while others exclude, people descended from later migration into England.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://chambers.co.uk/search/|title=Chambers – Search Chambers |quote=the citizens or inhabitants of, or people born in, England, considered as a group |access-date=7 February 2022 |archive-date=11 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200511160108/https://chambers.co.uk/search/ |url-status=live}}</ref>
3<sup>rd</sup> row: ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]
|population = '''90,000,000''' worldwide
|region
|region1 ={{ENG}}
|pop1 =
|ref1 =
|region2 = {{USA}}
|pop2 = 27,516,394 {{smallsup|a}}
|ref2 = <ref name="Census 2008 ACS Ancestry estimates"></ref>
|region3 = {{CAN}}
|pop3 = 6,570,015 {{smallsup|b}}
|ref3 = {{lower|<ref>(Ethnic origin) The gives 1,367,125 respondents stating their ''ethnic origin'' as English as a single response, and 5,202,890 including multiple responses, giving a combined total of 6,570,015.</ref>}}
|region4 = {{AUS}}
|pop4 = 6,358,880 {{smallsup|c}}
|ref4 = {{lower|<ref>(Ancestry) The reports 6,358,880 people of English ''ancestry'' in the 2001 ]..</ref>}}
|region5 = {{SCO}}
|pop5 = 408,000
|ref5 = <ref> BBC News, 15 Oct 2003</ref>
|region6 = {{NZL}}
|pop6 = 44,202 - 281,895
|ref6 = {{lower|<ref>(Ethnic origin) The reports 44,202 people (based on pre-assigned ethnic categories) stating they belong to the English ethnic group. The 1996 census to both the 1991 and the 2001 censuses, which had ''"a tendency for respondents to answer the 1996 question on the basis of ancestry (or descent) rather than 'ethnicity' (or cultural affiliation)"'' and reported 281,895 people with English origins; See also the figures for ']'.</ref>}}
|languages = ]
|religions = Traditionally ], mostly ], but also ]s (see ]) and also ] (see ]). ]s, ], as well as other religions. (see ]).
|footnotes = {{smallsup|a}} ], {{smallsup|b}} ], {{smallsup|c}} ]
}}


England is the largest and most populous ]. The majority of people living in England are ] citizens. In the ], the ] and the ] merged to become the ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.parliament.uk/actofunion/ |publisher=parliament.uk |title=Act of Union 1707 |access-date=26 August 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100921194331/https://collections.europarchive.org/ukparliament/20090701100701/https://www.parliament.uk/actofunion/ |archive-date=21 September 2010}}</ref> Over the years, ] have become fairly closely aligned with ] in general. The demonyms for men and women from England are Englishman<ref> at dictionary.cambridge.org. Retrieved 13 November 2023.</ref> and Englishwoman.<ref> at dictionary.cambridge.org. Retrieved 13 November 2023.</ref>
The '''English''' (from {{lang-ang|Englisc}}) are a ] and ] native to ], who speak ]. The English identity is of ] origin, when they were known in ] as the ''Anglecynn''. England is now a ], and the majority of English people in England are ].


== English nationality ==
Historically, the English population are descended from several ] similar peoples—the earlier ], the ] that settled in the area, including ], ], and ], who founded what was to become England (from the ] ''Englaland''), and the later ] and ]. Following the ] in 1707, in which the ] became part of the ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://collections.europarchive.org/ukparliament/20090701100701/http://www.parliament.uk/actofunion/|publisher=parliament.uk|title=Act of Union 1707|accessdate=2010-08-26}}</ref> English customs and identity became closely aligned with ] customs and identity.
England itself has no devolved government. The 1990s witnessed a rise in English self-awareness.{{sfn|Kumar|2003|pp=262–290}} This is linked to the expressions of national self-awareness of the other British nations of Wales, Scotland and, to some extent, Northern Ireland which take their most solid form in the new ] political arrangements within the United Kingdom{{snd}} and the waning of a shared British national identity with the growing distance between the end of the ] and the present.{{sfn|Kumar|2003|pp=}}<!--includes a link to the first 18 pages--><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/596703.stm |title=English nationalism 'threat to UK' |work=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210814023421/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/596703.stm |archive-date=14 August 2021 |date=9 January 2000}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.economist.com/world/britain/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10064563 |title=The English question Handle with care |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080928154846/http://www.economist.com/world/britain/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10064563 |archive-date=28 September 2008 |newspaper=] |date=1 November 2007}}</ref>


Many recent immigrants to England have assumed a solely British identity, while others have developed dual or mixed identities.{{sfn|Condor|Gibson|Abell|2006}}<ref>{{Cite news |title=Ethnic minorities feel strong sense of identity with Britain, report reveals |first=Maxine |last=Frith |work=] |date=8 January 2004 |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/ethnic-minorities-feel-strong-sense-of-identity-with-britain-report-reveals-578503.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110906074130/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/ethnic-minorities-feel-strong-sense-of-identity-with-britain-report-reveals-578503.html |archive-date=6 September 2011}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Hussain |first1=Asifa |last2=Millar |first2=William Lockley |date=2006 |title=Multicultural Nationalism |publisher=] |pages=149–150 |isbn=978-0-19-928071-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=d2Hv2QMMVrQC&dq=English+identity+Pakistani+British&pg=PA149 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160518225216/https://books.google.com/books?id=d2Hv2QMMVrQC&pg=PA149&lpg=PA149&dq=English+identity+Pakistani+British&source=web&ots=vK18u7nyNp&sig=mbDfLkCfSSRAXuOIyKbDnTcadJs&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=9&ct=result |archive-date=18 May 2016 |via=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Asian recruits boost England fan army |first=Dennis |last=Campbell |work=] |date=18 June 2006 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2006/jun/18/worldcup2006.sport |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161221150741/https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2006/jun/18/worldcup2006.sport |archive-date=21 December 2016}}</ref><ref>"National Identity and Community in England" (2006) ''Institute of Governance'' Briefing No. 7. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110515193209/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/ethnic-minorities-feel-strong-sense-of-identity-with-britain-report-reveals-578503.html|date=15 May 2011}}</ref> Use of the word "English" to describe Britons from ] in England is complicated by most non-white people in England identifying as British rather than English. In their 2004 ], the ] compared the ethnic identities of British people with their perceived ]. They found that while 58% of ] in England described their nationality as "English", non-white people were more likely to describe themselves as "British".<ref>"78 per cent of ] said they were British, while only 5 per cent said they were English, Scottish or Welsh", and the largest percentage of non-whites to identify as English were the people who described their ethnicity as "]" (37%).</ref> However, in the ], 58.4% of respondants identified as "British" instead of "English" to 14.9%. Although, the Office for National Statistics states the reason for this change may partially be true, it is most likely due to changes to the question structure where "British" became the top response option in 2021 for England only.<ref>{{cite web |title=National identity, England and Wales: Census 2021 |url=https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/ethnicity/bulletins/nationalidentityenglandandwales/census2021 |website=Office for National Statistics |access-date=5 January 2025}}</ref>
Today, a high proportion of English people have recent forbears from other parts of the United Kingdom, and some English people are also descended from more recent immigrants from other European countries and the ]. Through their position at the centre of the ], the English people are the source of the ], the ], ] and a variety of the globe's most popular ]s.


=== Relationship to Britishness ===
===English nationality===
It is unclear how many British people consider themselves English. The words "English" and "British" are often incorrectly used interchangeably, especially outside the UK. In his study of English identity, ] describes a common slip of the tongue in which people say "English, I mean British". He notes that this slip is normally made only by the English themselves and by foreigners: "Non-English members of the United Kingdom rarely say 'British' when they mean 'English{{'"}}. Kumar suggests that although this blurring is a sign of England's dominant position with the UK, it is also "problematic for the English when it comes to conceiving of their national identity. It tells of the difficulty that most English people have of distinguishing themselves, in a collective way, from the other inhabitants of the British Isles".{{sfn|Kumar|2003|pp=1–2}}
Although England is no longer an independent nation state, but rather a ] within the United Kingdom, the English may still be regarded as a "]" according to the '']'''s definition: a group united by factors that include "language, culture, history, or occupation of the same territory".<ref>"Nation", sense 1. ''The Oxford English Dictionary'', 2nd edtn., 1989'.</ref>


In 1965, the historian ] wrote,
The concept of an 'English nation' is older than that of the 'British nation' and the 1990s witnessed a revival in English self-consciousness.<ref name=KK-262-290>Krishan Kumar, ''The Rise of English National Identity'' (Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 262-290.</ref> This is linked to the expressions of national self-awareness of the other British nations of Wales and Scotland&nbsp; — which take their most solid form in the new ] political arrangements within the United Kingdom&nbsp; — and the waning of a shared British national identity with the growing distance between the end of the ] and the present.<ref name=KK-2003>Krishan Kumar. , Cambridge University Press, 2003</ref><ref>, ], Sunday, 9 January 2000</ref><ref>, ] 1 November 2007</ref>


<blockquote>When the '']'' was launched a generation ago, "England" was still an all-embracing word. It meant indiscriminately England and Wales; Great Britain; the United Kingdom; and even the British Empire. Foreigners used it as the name of a ] and indeed continue to do so. ], by origin a ],<!-- This is a verbatim quote, PLEASE DO NOT ALTER IT, even if you have are unfamiliar with or dislike this usage of the term "Scotch" --> was not ashamed to describe himself as "Prime Minister of England" Now terms have become more rigorous. The use of "England" except for a geographic area brings protests, especially from the ].<ref>] (1965, ''English History, 1914–1945'' Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. v</ref></blockquote>
While prescriptions of English national identity can involve beliefs in common descent, most political ] do not consider Englishness to be dependent upon ].<ref></ref><ref>Andrea Levy, , ''The Guardian'', February 19, 2000.</ref>


However, although Taylor believed this blurring effect was dying out, in his book '']'' (1999), ] lists numerous examples in history books of "British" still being used to mean "English" and vice versa.<ref>{{cite book |first=Norman |last=Davies |title=The Isles: A History |date=1999 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0333692837}}{{Page needed|date=September 2011}}</ref>
Recent migrants to England have assumed a solely ] identity, while others have developed dual or hyphenated identities.<ref>"Ethnic minorities feel strong sense of identity with Britain, report reveals" Maxine Frith '']'' 8 January 2004. ; Hussain, Asifa and Millar, William Lockley (2006) ''Multicultural Nationalism'' ] p149-150 ; CONDOR Susan; GIBSON Stephen; ABELL Jackie. (2006) "English identity and ethnic diversity in the context of UK constitutional change" ''Ethnicities'' '''6:'''123-158 ; "Asian recruits boost England fan army" by Dennis Campbell, '']'' 18 June 2006. ; "National Identity and Community in England" (2006) ''Institute of Governance'' Briefing No.7. </ref> Use of the word "English" to describe Britons from ethnic minorities in England is complicated by most non-white people in England identifying as British rather than English. In their 2004 Annual Population Survey, the ] compared the ''ethnic'' identities of British people with their perceived ''national'' identity. They found that while 58% of white people described their nationality as "English", the vast majority of non-white people called themselves "British".<ref>"78 per cent of ] said they were British, while only 5 per cent said they were English, Scottish or Welsh", and the largest percentage of non-whites to identify as English were the people who described their ethnicity as "]" (37%).</ref>


In December 2010, ] in '']'', analysing the use of "English" over "British", argued that English identity, rather than growing, had existed all along but has recently been unmasked from behind a veneer of Britishness.<ref>{{cite news |first=Matthew |last=Parris |work=] |date=18 December 2010 |title=With a shrug of the shoulders, England is becoming a nation once again}}</ref>
====Relationship to Britishness====
It is unclear how many British people consider themselves English. In the ], respondents were invited to state their ethnicity, but while there were ] for '] and for '], there were none for 'English', or '], who were subsumed into the general heading 'White British'.<ref> (]; see p. 43); see also .</ref> Following complaints about this, the 2011 census will "allow respondents to record their English, Welsh, Scottish, Northern Irish, Irish or other identity."<ref>.</ref>


== Historical and genetic origins ==
Another complication in defining the English is a common tendency for the words "English" and "British" to be used interchangeably. In his study of English identity, Krishan Kumar describes a common slip of the tongue in which people say "English, I mean British". He notes that this slip is normally made only by the English themselves and by foreigners: "Non-English members of the United Kingdom rarely say 'British' when they mean 'English'". Kumar suggests that although this blurring is a sign of England's dominant position with the UK, it is also "problematic for the English when it comes to conceiving of their national identity. It tells of the difficulty that most English people have of distinguishing themselves, in a collective way, from the other inhabitants of the British Isles".<ref>Krishan Kumar, ''The Making of English National Identity'' (Cambridge UP, 2003), pp.1-2.</ref>
{{Further|Genetic history of the British Isles}}


=== Replacement of Neolithic farmers by Bell Beaker populations ===
In 1965, the historian ] wrote,
English people, like most Europeans, largely descend from three distinct lineages:<ref name="Indo-European"/> Mesolithic ]s, descended from a ] population that arrived in Europe about 45,000 years ago;<ref>{{cite news |first=Andrew |last=Curry |title=The first Europeans weren't who you might think |url=https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/first-europeans-immigrants-genetic-testing-feature |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210319032852/https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/first-europeans-immigrants-genetic-testing-feature |url-status=dead |archive-date=19 March 2021 |work=National Geographic |date=August 2019}}</ref> ] who migrated from Anatolia during the ] 9,000 years ago;<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Gibbons |first1=Ann |title=Thousands of horsemen may have swept into Bronze Age Europe, transforming the local population |journal=Science |date=21 February 2017 |url=https://www.science.org/content/article/thousands-horsemen-may-have-swept-bronze-age-europe-transforming-local-population}}</ref> and Yamnaya ] who expanded into Europe from the Pontic–Caspian steppe in the context of ] 5,000 years ago.<ref name="Indo-European">{{Cite journal|last1=Haak |first1=Wolfgang |last2=Lazaridis |first2=Iosif |last3=Patterson |first3=Nick |last4=Rohland |first4=Nadin |last5=Mallick |first5=Swapan |last6=Llamas |first6=Bastien |last7=Brandt |first7=Guido |last8=Nordenfelt |first8=Susanne |last9=Harney |first9=Eadaoin |last10=Stewardson |first10=Kristin |last11=Fu |first11=Qiaomei |date=11 June 2015 |title=Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe |journal=] |volume=522 |issue=7555 |pages=207–211 |doi=10.1038/nature14317 |issn=0028-0836 |pmc=5048219 |pmid=25731166 |bibcode=2015Natur.522..207H |arxiv=1502.02783}}</ref>
:"When the '']'' was launched a generation ago, "England" was still an all-embracing word. It meant indiscriminately England and Wales; Great Britain; the United Kingdom; and even the British Empire. Foreigners used it as the name of a ] and indeed continue to do so. ], a ], was not ashamed to describe himself as "Prime Minister of England" Now terms have become more rigorous. The use of "England" except for a geographic area brings protests, especially from the ]."<ref>A.J.P. Taylor, ''English History, 1914-1945'' (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965), p. v.</ref>
However, although Taylor believed this blurring effect was dying out, in his 1999 book ''The Isles'', ] lists numerous examples in ] of "British" still being used to mean "English" and vice versa.<ref>Norman Davies, ''The Isles'', </ref>


Recent genetic studies have suggested that Britain's Neolithic population was largely replaced by a population from North Continental Europe characterised by the ] around 2400 BC, associated with the ] people from the ].{{Citation needed|date=September 2024}} This population lacked genetic affinity to some other Bell Beaker populations, such as the Iberian Bell Beakers, but appeared to be an offshoot of the ] single grave people, as developed in Western Europe.<ref name="auto1">{{Cite journal |doi=10.1038/nature07331 |pmid=18758442 |pmc=2735096 |title=Genes mirror geography within Europe |journal=] |volume=456 |issue=7218 |pages=98–101 |year=2008 |last1=Novembre |first1=John |last2=Johnson |first2=Toby |last3=Bryc |first3=Katarzyna |last4=Kutalik |first4=Zoltán |last5=Boyko |first5=Adam R.|last6=Auton|first6=Adam |last7=Indap |first7=Amit |last8=King |first8=Karen S. |last9=Bergmann |first9=Sven |last10=Nelson |first10=Matthew R. |last11=Stephens |first11=Matthew |last12=Bustamante |first12=Carlos D. |bibcode=2008Natur.456...98N}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2019/01/dutch-beakers-like-no-other-beakers.html |title=Dutch Beakers: Like no other Beakers| date=19 January 2019 |access-date=21 February 2022 |archive-date=12 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210512053452/https://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2019/01/dutch-beakers-like-no-other-beakers.html| url-status=live}}</ref> It is currently unknown whether these Beaker peoples went on to develop Celtic languages in the ], or whether later Celtic migrations introduced Celtic languages to Britain.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-43115485 |title=Ancient Britons 'replaced' by newcomers |work=] |date=21 February 2018 |last1=Rincon |first1=Paul |access-date=2 February 2019 |archive-date=4 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190304004824/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-43115485 |url-status=live}}</ref>
In December 2010, Matthew Parris of ‘The Spectator’ when analysing the use of “English” over “British”, suggests that the English identity, rather than growing, has existed all along and has been unmasked from behind a veneer of Britishness.<ref>Matthew Parris, “With a shrug of the shoulders, England is becoming a nation once again” (The Spectator, 2010-12-18)</ref>


The close genetic affinity of these Beaker people to Continental North Europeans means that British and Irish populations cluster genetically very closely with other Northwest European populations, regardless of how much Anglo-Saxon and Viking ancestry was introduced during the 1st millennium.{{clarify|reason=BC or AD, or presumably later?|date=July 2024}}<ref>{{Cite journal |doi=10.1534/genetics.116.189241 |pmid=27535931 |pmc=5068857 |title=Nationwide Genomic Study in Denmark Reveals Remarkable Population Homogeneity |journal=] |volume=204 |issue=2 |pages=711–722 |year=2016 |last1=Athanasiadis |first1=G. |last2=Cheng |first2=J. Y. |last3=Vilhjalmsson |first3=B. J. |last4=Jorgensen |first4=F. G. |last5=Als |first5=T. D. |last6=Le Hellard |first6=S. |last7=Espeseth |first7=T. |last8=Sullivan |first8=P. F. |last9=Hultman |first9=C. M. |last10=Kjaergaard |first10=P. C. |last11=Schierup |first11=M. H. |last12=Mailund |first12=T.}}</ref><ref name="auto1"/>
===English ethnicity===
The conventional view of English origins is that the English are primarily descended from the ], ] tribes that migrated to ] following the end of the ], with assimilation of later migrants such as the ] and ]. This version of history is considered by some historians and geneticists as simplistic or even incorrect.


=== Anglo-Saxons, Vikings and Normans ===
The ], particularly their use of ] such as ], ], and ], held on for several centuries in parts of England such as ], ], ], ], the ] (particularly ] and ]), ], ], and parts of ] (particularly ]). However, the notion of the Anglo-Saxon English has traditionally been important in defining English identity and distinguishing the English from their ] neighbours, such as the ], ], ] and ]. Historian Catherine Hills describes what she calls the "]" of the English:
{{Main|Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain}}
:The arrival of the Anglo-Saxons&nbsp;... is still perceived as an important and interesting event because it is believed to have been a key factor in the identity of the present inhabitants of the British Isles, involving migration on such a scale as to permanently change the population of south-east Britain, and making the English a distinct and different people from the ]ic ], ] and ]&nbsp;....this is an example of a national origin myth&nbsp;... and shows why there are seldom simple answers to questions about origins.<ref>Hills, Catherine (2003) "The Origins of the English" p. 18. Duckworth Debates in Archaeology. Duckworth. London. ISBN 0 7156 3191 8</ref>


] to Matthew from the ], an Insular masterpiece]]
A popular interest in English identity is evident in the recent reporting of scientific and sociological investigations of the English, in which their complex results are heavily simplified. In 2002, the ] used the headline "English and Welsh are races apart" to report a genetic survey of test subjects from ]s in England and Wales,<ref>, '']'', 30 June 2002</ref> while in September 2006, '']'' reported that a survey of first names and surnames in the UK had identified ] in ] as "the 'most English' place in England with 88.58% of residents having an English ethnic background".<ref>"", Robert Winnett and Holly Watt, '']'', 10 June 2006</ref> The '']'' printed an article with the headline "We're all Germans! (and we have been for 1,600 years)".<ref>Julie Wheldon. , ], 19 July 2006</ref> In all these cases, the language of race is employed by the journalists.<ref>The BBC article claims a 50-100% "wipeout" of "indigenous British" by Anglo-Saxon "invaders", while the original article ('''' Michael E. Weale ''et al.'', in ''Molecular Biology and Evolution'' 19 ) claims only a 50-100% "contribution" of "Anglo-Saxons" to the current Central English ''male'' population, with samples deriving only from central England; the conclusions of this study have been questioned in Cristian Capelli, ''et al.'', '''' '']'', 13 (2003). The ''Times'' article reports Richard Webber's ''OriginsInfo'' database, which does not use the word 'ethnic' and acknowledges that its conclusions are unsafe for many groups; see , ''OriginsInfo''.</ref>


The influence of later invasions and migrations on the English population has been debated, as studies that sampled only modern DNA have produced uncertain results and have thus been subject to a large variety of interpretations.<ref>{{Cite journal |url=https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/19/7/1008/1068561 |title=Y Chromosome Evidence for Anglo-Saxon Mass Migration |first1=Michael E. |last1=Weale |first2=Deborah A.|last2=Weiss|first3=Rolf F.|last3=Jager |first4=Neil|last4=Bradman|first5=Mark G. |last5=Thomas |date=1 July 2002 |journal=] |volume=19 |issue=7 |pages=1008–1021 |via=academic.oup.com |doi=10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004160 |pmid=12082121 |doi-access=free |access-date=7 June 2020 |archive-date=2 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200602051714/https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/19/7/1008/1068561 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.csueastbay.edu/museum/files/docs/exhibit/dna/dna-chrom-isles.pdf |title=A Y Chromosome Census of the British Isles |access-date=7 June 2020 |archive-date=7 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200607222334/https://www.csueastbay.edu/museum/files/docs/exhibit/dna/dna-chrom-isles.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="oppenheimer">{{Cite book |last=Oppenheimer |first=Stephen |date=2006 |title=The Origins of the British: A Genetic Detective Story |publisher=] |location=London |isbn=978-1-84529-158-7}}</ref> More recently, however, ancient DNA has been used to provide a clearer picture of the genetic effects of these movements of people.
In addition, several recent books, including those of ] and ], have argued that the recent genetic studies in fact do not show a clear dividing line between the English and their 'Celtic' neighbours, but that there is a gradual ] change from west coast Britain to east coast Britain. They suggest that the majority of the ancestors of British peoples were the original palaeolithic settlers of Great Britain, and that the differences that exist between the east and west coasts of Great Britain though not large, are deep in prehistory, mostly originating in the upper palaeolithic and Mesolithic (15,000-7,000 years ago). Furthermore, Oppenheimer states that genetic testing has proven that "75% of British and Irish ancestors arrive between 15,000 and 7,500 years ago".<ref></ref>


One 2016 study, using Iron Age and Anglo-Saxon era DNA found at grave sites in Cambridgeshire, calculated that ten modern day eastern English samples had 38% Anglo-Saxon ancestry on average, while ten Welsh and Scottish samples each had 30% Anglo-Saxon ancestry, with a large statistical spread in all cases. However, the authors noted that the similarity observed between the various sample groups was likely to be due to more recent internal migration.<ref>Schiffels, S. ''et al.'' (2016) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191217103037/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26783965 |date=17 December 2019}}, Nature Communications 7, Article number:10408 {{doi|10.1038/ncomms10408}}</ref>
Oppenheimer also claims that ] split from Indo-European earlier than previously suspected, some 6000 years ago, while English split from ] before the Roman period. Oppenheimer believes that a Germanic language that became English was spoken by the tribes of what is now England long before the arrival of the Anglo-Saxon and also discounts the view that the people of the area were ever Celtic.<ref>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/?p=516</ref><ref name="opp">Oppenheimer, S. (2006). The Origins of the British: A Genetic Detective Story: Constable and Robinson, London. ISBN 978-1-84529-158-7.</ref>


Another 2016 study conducted using evidence from burials found in northern England, found that a significant genetic difference was present in bodies from the Iron Age and the Roman period on the one hand, and the Anglo-Saxon period on the other. Samples from modern-day Wales were found to be similar to those from the Iron Age and Roman burials, while samples from much of modern England, East Anglia in particular, were closer to the Anglo-Saxon-era burial. This was found to demonstrate a "profound impact" from the Anglo-Saxon migrations on the modern English gene pool, though no specific percentages were given in the study.<ref name="auto5"/>
==History of English people==
{{Main|History of England}}


A third study combined the ancient data from both of the preceding studies and compared it to a large number of modern samples from across Britain and Ireland. This study found that modern southern, central and eastern English populations were of "a predominantly Anglo-Saxon-like ancestry" while those from northern and southwestern England had a greater degree of indigenous origin.<ref>Ross P. Byrne, Rui Martiniano, Lara M. Cassidy, Matthew Carrigan, Garrett Hellenthal, Orla Hardiman, Daniel G. Bradley, Russell McLaughlin: "Insular Celtic population structure and genomic footprints of migration" (2018)</ref>
===Antiquity===
{{See|Genetic history of the British Isles|Settlement of Great Britain and Ireland}}
The term "English" is not used to refer to the earliest inhabitants of the area that would become England—] ]s, ]ic ], and ] colonists,<ref name="OED"/> the same applies to the "Irish", "Welsh" and "Scots". This is because up to and during the ], the region now called England was not a distinct country; all the native inhabitants of Britain spoke ] and were regarded as ] (or Brythons) divided into many ]s. The word "English" refers to a heritage that began with the arrival of the ] in the 5th century, who settled lands already inhabited by ] tribes. That heritage then comes to include later arrivals, including Scandinavians, ], as well as those Romano-Britons who still lived in England.<ref name="OED">
{{cite book
|last=Simpson
|first=John
|coauthors=Weiner, Edmund
|title=The Oxford English Dictionary: second edition
|publisher=]
|date=1989-03-30
|location=]
|url=http://www.oed.com
|pages=English
|isbn=0198611862 }}</ref>


A major 2020 study, which used DNA from Viking-era burials in various regions across Europe, found that modern English samples showed nearly equal contributions from a native British "North Atlantic" population and a Danish-like population. While much of the latter signature was attributed to the earlier settlement of the Anglo-Saxons, it was calculated that up to 6% of it could have come from Danish Vikings, with a further 4% contribution from a Norwegian-like source representing the Norwegian Vikings. The study also found an average 18% admixture from a source further south in Europe, which was interpreted as reflecting the legacy of French migration under the Normans.<ref>Margaryan, A., Lawson, D.J., Sikora, M. et al. "Population genomics of the Viking world". ''Nature'' 585, 390–396 (2020) ''See Supplementary Note 11 in particular''</ref>
===Early Middle Ages===
{{further|], ], ], ], ]}}


A landmark 2022 study titled "The Anglo-Saxon migration and the formation of the early English gene pool", found the English to be of plurality Anglo-Saxon-like ancestry, with heavy native ], and newly confirmed medieval French admixture. Significant regional variation was also observed.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Gretzinger |last2=Sayer |last3=Justeau |display-authors=etal |date=21 September 2022 |title=The Anglo-Saxon migration and the formation of the early English gene pool |journal=] |volume= 610|issue= 7930|pages= 112–119|doi=10.1038/s41586-022-05247-2|pmid= 36131019|pmc= 9534755|bibcode=2022Natur.610..112G }}</ref>
]. From ''A Restitution of Decayed Intelligence'' by ] (1605)]]
The first people to be called 'English' were the ], a group of closely related ] tribes that began migrating to eastern and southern ], from southern ] and northern ], in the 5th century AD, after the ]. The Anglo-Saxons gave their name to England (''Engla land'', meaning "Land of the Angles") and to the English.


== History of English people ==
] at ], ].]]
{{Redirect-distinguish|History of the English|History of English}}
The Anglo-Saxons arrived in a land that was already populated by people commonly referred to as the ']'—the descendants of the native Brythonic-speaking population that lived in the area of Britain under Roman rule during the 1st-5th centuries AD. The multi-ethnic nature of the Roman Empire meant that small numbers of other peoples may have also been present in England before the Anglo-Saxons arrived. There is archaeological evidence, for example, of an early North African presence in a Roman garrison at Aballava, now Burgh-by-Sands, in Cumbria; a fourth-century inscription says that the Roman military unit ''Numerus Maurorum Aurelianorum'' ("unit of Aurelian Moors") from Muretania (Morocco) was stationed there.<ref>, Channel 4, accessed 21 December 2009.</ref>
{{Main|History of England}}


=== Anglo-Saxon settlement ===
The exact nature of ] and their relationship with the Romano-British is a matter of debate. Traditionally, it was believed that a mass invasion by various Anglo-Saxon tribes largely displaced the indigenous British population in southern and eastern ] (modern day England with the exception of ]). This was supported by the writings of ], the only contemporary historical account of the period, describing slaughter and starvation of native Britons by invading peoples ('']'').<ref></ref>
{{Further|Anglo-Saxons|Roman Britain|Sub-Roman Britain|Brython|l4=Ancient Britons|Romano-British culture|l5=Romano-Britons}}
]]]
The first people to be called "English" were the ], a group of closely related ] tribes that began migrating to eastern and southern Britain, from southern Denmark and northern Germany, in the 5th century AD, after the ]. The Anglo-Saxons gave their name to England ("Engla land", meaning "Land of the Angles") and to the English.


The Anglo-Saxons arrived in a land that was already populated by people commonly referred to as the "]"—the descendants of the native Brittonic-speaking population that lived in the area of Britain under Roman rule during the 1st–5th centuries AD. The multi-ethnic nature of the ] meant that small numbers of other peoples may have also been present in England before the Anglo-Saxons arrived. There is archaeological evidence, for example, of an early North African presence in a Roman garrison at ], now ], in Cumbria: a 4th-century inscription says that the Roman military unit "Numerus Maurorum Aurelianorum" ("unit of Aurelian Moors") from Mauretania (Morocco) was stationed there.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130724015646/http://www.channel4.com/history/microsites/B/blackhistorymap/arch.html |date=24 July 2013}}, Channel 4. Retrieved 21 December 2009.</ref> Although the Roman Empire incorporated peoples from far and wide, genetic studies suggest the Romans did not significantly mix into the British population.<ref>Eva Botkin-Kowacki, ' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181015114720/https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0120/Where-did-the-British-come-from-Ancient-DNA-holds-clues |date=15 October 2018}}' (20/01/16), '']''</ref>
Added to this was the fact that the ] contains no more than a handful of words borrowed from ] sources (although the names of some towns, cities, rivers etc. do have Brythonic or pre-Brythonic origins, becoming more frequent towards the west of Britain).<ref></ref> However, this view has been re-evaluated by some archaeologists and historians since the 1960s, and more recently supported by genetic studies,<ref name="opp"/> who see only minimal evidence for mass displacement. Archaeologist ] has stated that he "can't see any evidence for ''bona fide'' mass migrations after the ]."<ref>''Britain BC: Life in Britain and Ireland before the Romans'' by ], p. 122. Harper Perennial. ISBN 0-00-712693-X.</ref>


]s]]
While the historian Malcolm Todd writes "It is much more likely that a large proportion of the British population remained in place and was progressively dominated by a Germanic aristocracy, in some cases marrying into it and leaving Celtic names in the, admittedly very dubious, early lists of Anglo-Saxon dynasties. But how we identify the surviving Britons in areas of predominantly Anglo-Saxon settlement, either archaeologically or linguistically, is still one of the deepest problems of early English history."<ref>]. , in Cameron, Keith. ''The nation: myth or reality?''. Intellect Books, 1994, accessed December 21, 2009.</ref>
The exact nature of ] and their relationship with the Romano-British is a matter of debate. The traditional view is that a mass invasion by various Anglo-Saxon tribes largely displaced the indigenous British population in southern and eastern Britain (modern-day England with the exception of ]). This is supported by the writings of ], who gives the only contemporary historical account of the period, and describes the slaughter and starvation of native Britons by invading tribes ('']'').<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.tertullian.org/fathers/gildas_02_ruin_of_britain.htm |title=The Ruin of Britain |date=1899 |pages=4–252 |first=Gildas the |last=Wise |website=Tertullian.org |access-date=21 August 2017 |archive-date=22 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170922011347/http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/gildas_02_ruin_of_britain.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> Furthermore, the English language contains no more than a handful of words borrowed from ] sources.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071206051120/https://www.yorksj.ac.uk/dialect/celtpn.htm|date=6 December 2007}} However the names of some towns, cities, rivers etc. do have Brittonic or pre-Brittonic origins, becoming more frequent towards the west of Britain.</ref>


This view was later re-evaluated by some archaeologists and historians, with a more small-scale migration being posited, possibly based around an elite of male warriors that took over the rule of the country and gradually acculturated the people living there.<ref>"Britain BC: Life in Britain and Ireland before the Romans" by ], p. 122. Harper Perennial. {{ISBN|0-00-712693-X}}.</ref><ref>Ward-Perkins, Bryan. "Why did the Anglo-Saxons not become more British?" ''The English Historical Review'' 115.462 (2000): p. 523</ref><ref>Higham, Nicholas J. and Ryan, Martin J. "The Anglo-Saxon World" (Yale University Press, 2013){{ISBN?}}{{page needed|date=July 2023}}</ref> Within this theory, two processes leading to Anglo-Saxonisation have been proposed. One is similar to culture changes observed in Russia, North Africa and parts of the Islamic world, where a politically and socially powerful minority culture becomes, over a rather short period, adopted by a settled majority. This process is usually termed "elite dominance".<ref name="Ward-Perkins, Bryan 2000">Ward-Perkins, Bryan. "Why did the Anglo-Saxons not become more British?" ''The English Historical Review'' 115.462 (2000): 513–533.</ref> The second process is explained through incentives, such as the ] outlined in the law code of Ine of Wessex which produced an incentive to become Anglo-Saxon or at least English speaking.<ref>{{cite web |last=Ingham |first=Richard |title=Anglo-Saxons wanted genetic supremacy |website=] |date=19 July 2006 |url=https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2006/07/19/1690600.htm |access-date=7 June 2020 |archive-date=15 December 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201215223721/https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2006/07/19/1690600.htm |url-status=live}}</ref> Historian Malcolm Todd writes, "It is much more likely that a large proportion of the British population remained in place and was progressively dominated by a Germanic aristocracy, in some cases marrying into it and leaving Celtic names in the, admittedly very dubious, early lists of Anglo-Saxon dynasties. But how we identify the surviving Britons in areas of predominantly Anglo-Saxon settlement, either archaeologically or linguistically, is still one of the deepest problems of early English history."<ref>]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160124200714/https://books.google.com/books?id=D3GPUqysfoAC&pg=PA3&dq=Anglo-Saxon+Origins:+The+Reality+of+the+Myth&num=100&client=firefox-a&cd=1#v=onepage&q=Anglo-Saxon%20Origins%3A%20The%20Reality%20of%20the%20Myth&f=false |date=24 January 2016}}, in Cameron, Keith. "The nation: myth or reality?"bIntellect Books, 1994. Retrieved 21 December 2009.</ref>
In a survey of the genes of British and Irish men, even those British regions that were most genetically similar to (Germanic speaking) continental regions were still more genetically British than continental: "When included in the PC analysis, the Frisians were more 'Continental' than any of the British samples, although they were somewhat closer to the British ones than the North German/Denmark sample. For example, the part of mainland Britain that has the most Continental input is Central England, but even here the ] frequency, not below 44% (Southwell), is higher than the 35% observed in the Frisians. These results demonstrate that even with the choice of Frisians as a source for the Anglo-Saxons, there is a clear indication of a continuing indigenous component in the English paternal genetic makeup."<ref name="y-chrom">Capelli, C., N. Redhead, J. K. Abernethy, F. Gratrix, J. F. Wilson, T. Moen, T. Hervig, M. Richards, M. P.H. Stumpf, P. A. Underhill, P. Bradshaw, A. Shaha, M. G. Thomas, N. Bradman and D. B. Goldstein '''' '']'', 13 (2003).</ref>


An emerging view is that the degree of population replacement by the Anglo-Saxons, and thus the degree of survival of the Romano-Britons, varied across England, and that as such the overall settlement of Britain by the Anglo-Saxons cannot be described by any one process in particular. Large-scale migration and population shift seems to be most applicable in the cases of eastern regions such as East Anglia and Lincolnshire,<ref>Stefan Burmeister, ''Archaeology and Migration'' (2000): " ... immigration in the nucleus of the Anglo-Saxon settlement does not seem aptly described in terms of the 'elite-dominance model.' To all appearances, the settlement was carried out by small, agriculture-oriented kinship groups. This process corresponds more closely to a classic settler model. The absence of early evidence of a socially demarcated elite underscores the supposition that such an elite did not play a substantial role. Rich burials such as are well known from Denmark have no counterparts in England until the 6th century. At best, the elite-dominance model might apply in the peripheral areas of the settlement territory, where an immigration predominantly {{sic|comprised |hide=y|of}} men and the existence of hybrid cultural forms might support it."</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Dark |first=Ken R. |title=Large-scale population movements into and from Britain south of Hadrian's Wall in the fourth to sixth centuries AD |year=2003 |url=https://www.reading.ac.uk/web/files/GCMS/RMS-2003-03_K._R._Dark,_Large-scale_population_movements_into_and_from_Britan_south_of_Hadrian's_Wall_in_the_fourth_to_sixth_centuries_AD.pdf |access-date=21 February 2022 |archive-date=1 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210601080017/https://www.reading.ac.uk/web/files/GCMS/RMS-2003-03_K._R._Dark%2C_Large-scale_population_movements_into_and_from_Britan_south_of_Hadrian%27s_Wall_in_the_fourth_to_sixth_centuries_AD.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>Toby F. Martin, ''The Cruciform Brooch and Anglo-Saxon England'', Boydell and Brewer Press (2015), pp. 174–178</ref><ref>Catherine Hills, "The Anglo-Saxon Migration: An Archaeological Case Study of Disruption," in ''Migrations and Disruptions'', ed. Brenda J. Baker and Takeyuki Tsuda, pp. 45–48</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Coates |first=Richard |title=Celtic whispers: revisiting the problems of the relation between Brittonic and Old English |url=https://ul.qucosa.de/api/qucosa%3A31804/attachment/ATT-0/|access-date=7 June 2020 |archive-date=8 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308132851/https://ul.qucosa.de/api/qucosa:31804/attachment/ATT-0/ |url-status=live}}</ref> while in parts of Northumbria, much of the native population likely remained in place as the incomers took over as elites.<ref name="Härke, Heinrich 2011">Härke, Heinrich. "Anglo-Saxon Immigration and Ethnogenesis." ''Medieval Archaeology'' 55.1 (2011): 1–28.</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Kortlandt |first=Frederik |title=Relative Chronology |year=2018 |url=https://www.kortlandt.nl/publications/art320e.pdf |access-date=7 June 2020 |archive-date=8 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308144052/https://www.kortlandt.nl/publications/art320e.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref> In a study of place names in northeastern England and southern Scotland, Bethany Fox found that the migrants settled in large numbers in river valleys, such as those of the Tyne and the Tweed, with the Britons moving to the less fertile hill country and becoming acculturated over a longer period. Fox describes the process by which English came to dominate this region as "a synthesis of mass-migration and elite-takeover models."<ref>{{cite web |last=Fox |first=Bethany |title=The P-Celtic Place Names of North-East England and South-East Scotland |url=https://www.heroicage.org/issues/10/fox.html |access-date=21 February 2022 |archive-date=28 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211128014201/http://www.heroicage.org/issues/10/fox.html |url-status=live}}</ref>
===Vikings and the Danelaw===
{{See|Viking|Danelaw}}


=== Vikings and the Danelaw ===
From about AD 800 waves of ] ] assaults on the coastlines of the ] were gradually followed by a succession of Danish settlers in England. At first, the Vikings were very much considered a separate people from the English. This separation was enshrined when ] signed the ] to establish the ], a division of England between English and Danish rule, with the Danes occupying northern and eastern England.<ref>''The Age of Athelstan'' by Paul Hill (2004), Tempus Publishing. ISBN 0-7524-2566-8</ref>
{{Further|Vikings|Danelaw}}


] from 978 to 1013 and again from 1014 until his death.]]
However, Alfred's successors subsequently won military victories against the Danes, incorporating much of the Danelaw into the nascent kingdom of England. Danish invasions continued into the 11th century, and there were both English and Danish kings in the period following the unification of England (for example, ] (978–1013 and 1014–1016) was English but ] (1016–1035) was Danish).


From about 800 AD, waves of ] Viking assaults on the coastlines of the ] were gradually followed by a succession of Danish settlers in England. At first, the Vikings were very much considered a separate people from the English. This separation was enshrined when ] signed the ] to establish the Danelaw, a division of England between English and Danish rule, with the Danes occupying northern and eastern England.<ref>''The Age of Athelstan'' by Paul Hill (2004), Tempus Publishing. {{ISBN|0-7524-2566-8}}{{page needed|date=July 2023}}</ref>
Gradually, the Danes in England came to be seen as 'English'. They had a noticeable impact on the ]: many English words, such as ''anger'', ''ball'', ''egg'', ''got'', ''knife'', ''take'', and ''they'', are ],<ref>'''' by Douglas Harper (2001), . Retrieved 10 July 2006.</ref> and place names that end in ''-thwaite'' and ''-by'' are Scandinavian in origin.<ref>''The Adventure of English'', ], 2003. Pg 22</ref>


However, Alfred's successors subsequently won military victories against the Danes, incorporating much of the Danelaw into the nascent kingdom of England. Danish invasions continued into the 11th century, and there were both English and Danish kings in the period following the unification of England (for example, ]{{efn|Spellings of this name most common in modern texts are "Ethelred" and "Æthelred" (or "Aethelred"), the latter being closer to the original ] form ''Æþelræd''.}} (978–1013 and 1014–1016) was English but ] (1016–1035) was Danish).
===English unification===
{{further|], ], ]}}
]s.]]
The English population was not politically unified until the 10th century. Before then, it consisted of a number of ]s which gradually coalesced into a ] of seven powerful states, the most powerful of which were ] and ]. The English ] began to form when the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms united against Danish Viking invasions, which began around 800 AD. Over the following century and a half England was for the most part a politically unified entity, and remained permanently so after 959.


Gradually, the Danes in England came to be seen as 'English'. They had a noticeable impact on the English language: many English words, such as ''anger'', ''ball'', ''egg'', ''got'', ''knife'', ''take'', and ''they'', are ],<ref>'' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170704080627/http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?l=d&p=18 |date=4 July 2017}}'' by Douglas Harper (2001), {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171008053439/http://etymonline.com/sources.php |date=8 October 2017}}. Retrieved 10 July 2006.</ref> and place names that end in ''-thwaite'' and ''-by'' are Scandinavian in origin.<ref>''The Adventure of English'', ], 2003. p.&nbsp;22.</ref>
The ] of England was formed in 937 by ] of ] after the ],<ref>'''': '''Historic Figures: '''. Retrieved 30 October 2006.</ref><ref>'''' by ], ] website. Retrieved 30 October 2006.</ref> as Wessex grew from a relatively small kingdom in the South West to become the founder of the Kingdom of the English, incorporating all ] kingdoms and the ].<ref name="Rowse">], ''The Story of Britain'', Artus 1979 ISBN 0-297-83311-1</ref>


===Norman and Angevin rule=== === English unification ===
{{Further|Treaty of Wedmore|Treaty of Alfred and Guthrum}}
] of England (right) at the Norman court, from the ]]]


The English population was not politically unified until the 10th century. Before then, there were a number of ]s which gradually coalesced into a ] of seven states, the most powerful of which were ] and ]. The English ] began to form when the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms united against Danish Viking invasions, which began around 800 AD. Over the following century and a half England was for the most part a politically unified entity, and remained permanently so after 954.
{{further|]}}
The ] during 1066 brought Anglo-Saxon and Danish rule of England to an end, as the new ] elite almost universally replaced the Anglo-Saxon aristocracy and church leaders. After the conquest, "English" normally included all natives of England, whether they were of Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian or Celtic ancestry, to distinguish them from the Norman invaders, who were regarded as "Norman" even if born in England, for a generation or two after the Conquest.<ref>'']'', 2nd edition, s.v. 'English'.</ref> The Norman dynasty ruled England for 87 years until the death of ] in 1154, when the succession passed to ], ] (based in France), and England became part of the ] until 1399.


The nation of England was formed in 12 July 927 by ] of Wessex after the Treaty of ],<ref>{{Cite web |last=esmeraldamac |date=2012-02-16 |title=The Treaty of Eamont Bridge in 927CE |url=https://esmeraldamac.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/the-treaty-of-eamont-bridge-in-927ce-or-the-first-british-union/ |access-date=2024-02-27 |website=Esmeralda's Cumbrian History & Folklore |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/athelstan.shtml|title=Athelstan (c. 895–939): Historic Figures|website=BBC |access-date=30 October 2006|archive-date=13 February 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070213191353/http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/athelstan.shtml|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>'' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101111055223/http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A3483029 |date=11 November 2010}}'' by ], ] website. Retrieved 30 October 2006.</ref> as Wessex grew from a relatively small kingdom in the South West to become the founder of the Kingdom of the English, incorporating all Anglo-Saxon kingdoms and the Danelaw.<ref name="Rowse">], ''The Story of Britain'', Artus 1979 {{ISBN|0-297-83311-1}}</ref>
Various contemporary sources suggest that within fifty years of the invasion most of the Normans outside the royal court had switched to English, with ] remaining the prestige language of government and law largely out of social inertia. For example, Orderic Vitalis, a historian born in 1075 and the son of a Norman knight, said that he learned French only as a second language. Anglo-Norman continued to be used by the Plantagenet kings until ] came to the throne.<ref></ref> Over time the English language became more important even in the court, and the Normans were gradually assimilated, until, by the 14th Century, both rulers and subjects regarded themselves as English and spoke the English language.<ref></ref>


=== Norman and Angevin rule ===
Despite the assimilation of the Normans, the distinction between 'English' and 'French' survived in official documents long after it had fallen out of common use, in particular in the legal phrase '']'' (a rule by which a ] had to prove an unidentified murdered body found on their soil to be that of an Englishman, rather than a Norman, if they wanted to avoid a fine). This law was abolished in 1340.<ref>], s.v. 'Englishry'.</ref>
{{Further|Normans}}
], 1066 (from the ])]]


The ] during 1066 brought Anglo-Saxon and Danish rule of England to an end, as the new ] ] elite almost universally replaced the Anglo-Saxon aristocracy and church leaders. After the conquest, "English" normally included all natives of England, whether they were of Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian or Celtic ancestry, to distinguish them from the Norman invaders, who were regarded as "Norman" even if born in England, for a generation or two after the Conquest.<ref>'']'', 2nd edition, s.v. 'English'.</ref> The Norman dynasty ruled England for 87 years until the death of ] in 1154, when the succession passed to ], ] (based in France), and England became part of the ] until its collapse in 1214.
===In the United Kingdom===
{{Image label begin|image=Flags of the Union Jack.svg|width={{{width|350}}}|float={{{float|right}}}}}
{{Image label small|x=0.03|y=0.23|scale={{{width|350}}}|text=] <br />(])}}
{{Image label small|x=0.46|y=0.23|scale={{{width|350}}}|text=] <br />(])}}
{{Image label small|x=0.32|y=0.49|scale={{{width|350}}}|text=]}}
{{Image label small|x=0.70|y=0.51|scale={{{width|350}}}|text=] <br />(])}}
{{Image label small|x=0.52|y=0.76|scale={{{width|350}}}|text=]}}


] and ] continued to be the two languages used officially by the Plantagenet kings until ] came to the throne, when ] became used in official documents, but alongside Anglo-Norman and Latin.<ref>{{cite web |title=England—Plantagenet Kings |url=https://heritage-history.com/www/heritage.php?Dir=eras&FileName=britain_3.php |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101216064812/https://heritage-history.com/www/heritage.php?Dir=eras&FileName=britain_3.php |archive-date=16 December 2010 |website=Heritage History<!-- — Putting the "Story" back into History-->}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Upward |first=Christopher |title=The History of English Spelling |last2=Davidson |first2=George |date=8 December 2024 |location=England |publication-date=2011 |pages=70-74}}</ref> Over time the English language became more important even in the court, and the Normans were gradually assimilated, until, by the 14th century, both rulers and subjects regarded themselves as English and spoke the English language.<ref>{{cite web |title=British History in depth: The Ages of English |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/lang_gallery_04.shtml |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170826122902/http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/lang_gallery_04.shtml |archive-date=26 August 2017 |access-date=21 August 2017 |website=] – History}}</ref>
{{Image label end}}
{{Main|History of the formation of the United Kingdom}}


Despite the assimilation of the Normans, the distinction between 'English' and 'French' people survived in some official documents long after it had fallen out of common use, in particular in the legal process '']'' (a rule by which a ] had to prove an unidentified murdered body found on their soil to be that of an Englishman, rather than a Norman, if they wanted to avoid a fine). This law was abolished in 1340.<ref>], s.v. 'Englishry'.</ref>
Since the 18th century, England has been one part of a wider political entity covering all or part of the ], which today is called the ]. ] was ] by England by the ], which incorporated Wales into the English state.<ref>: '''Ireland on the Net''' Website. Retrieved 23 June 2006.</ref> A new British identity was subsequently developed when ] became ] as well, and expressed the desire to be known as the monarch of Britain.<ref>''A History of Britain: The British Wars 1603-1776'' by ], BBC Worldwide. ISBN 0-563-53747-7.</ref>

=== United Kingdom ===
{{Main|History of the formation of the United Kingdom}}
{{Image label begin|overflow-x=visible|image=Flags of the Union Jack.svg|width=350|float=right}}
{{Image label small|x=0.04|y=0.23|scale=350|text=]<br />(])}}
{{Image label small|x=0.49|y=0.23|scale=350|text=]<br />(])}}
{{Image label small|x=0.32|y=0.52|scale=350|text=]}}
{{Image label small|x=0.70|y=0.52|scale=350|text=]<br />(])}}
{{Image label small|x=0.50|y=0.80|scale=350|text=]}}
{{Image label end}}


Since the 18th century, England has been one part of a wider political entity covering all or part of the British Isles, which today is called the United Kingdom. ] was ] by England by the ], which incorporated Wales into the English state.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.iol.ie/~dluby/history.htm |title=Liberation of Ireland |website=Iol.ie |access-date=23 June 2006 |archive-date=15 June 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060615024445/http://www.iol.ie/~dluby/history.htm |url-status=live}}</ref> A new British identity was subsequently developed when ] became ] as well, and expressed the desire to be known as the monarch of Britain.<ref>''A History of Britain: The British Wars 1603–1776'' by ], BBC Worldwide. {{ISBN|0-563-53747-7}}.</ref>
In 1707, England formed a union with ] by passing an ] in March 1707 that ratified the ]. The ] had previously passed its own Act of Union, so the ] was born on May 1, 1707.


In 1801, another ] formed a union between the Kingdom of Great Britain and the ], creating the ]. About two thirds of the Irish population (those who lived in 26 of the 32 counties of Ireland), left the United Kingdom in 1922, to form the ]. The remainder became In 1707, England formed a union with ] by passing an ] in March 1707 that ratified the ]. The ] had previously passed its own Act of Union, so the ] was born on 1 May 1707. In 1801, another ] formed a union between the Kingdom of Great Britain and the ], creating the ]. In 1922, about two-thirds of the Irish population (those who lived in 26 of the 32 counties of Ireland), left the United Kingdom to form the ]. The remainder became the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, although this name was not introduced until 1927, after some years in which the term "United Kingdom" had been little used.{{citation needed|date=March 2023}}
the ].


Throughout the history of the UK, the English have been dominant in population and political weight. As a consequence, notions of 'Englishness' and 'Britishness' are often very similar. At the same time, after the 1707 Union, the English, along with the other peoples of the British Isles, have been encouraged to think of themselves as British rather than identifying themselves by the smaller constituent nations.<ref>''The English'', ] 1998<!---Page reference needed---></ref> Throughout the history of the UK, the English have been dominant in population and in political weight. As a consequence, notions of 'Englishness' and 'Britishness' are often very similar. At the same time, after the Union of 1707, the English, along with the other peoples of the British Isles, have been encouraged to think of themselves as British rather than to identify themselves with the constituent nations.<ref>''The English'', ] 1998{{Page needed|date=September 2011}}</ref>


===Immigration and assimilation=== === Immigration and assimilation ===
{{See also|Historical immigration to Great Britain|Immigration to the United Kingdom (1922-present day)}} {{See also|Historical immigration to Great Britain|Immigration to the United Kingdom (1922-present day)}}


Although England has not been conquered since the Norman conquest nor extensively settled since, it has been the destination of varied numbers of migrants at different periods from the seventeenth century. While some members of these groups maintain a separate ethnic identity, others have ] and ] with the English. Since ]'s ] in 1656, there have been waves of ] immigration from ] in the nineteenth century and from ] in the twentieth.<ref>: '''European Jewish Press'''. Retrieved 21 July 2006.</ref> England has been the destination of varied numbers of migrants at different periods from the 17th century onwards. While some members of these groups seek to practise a form of pluralism, attempting to maintain a separate ethnic identity, others have ] and ] with the English. Since ]'s ] in 1656, there have been waves of ] immigration from ] in the 19th century and from Germany in the 20th.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ejpress.org/digest/in_depth/on_anglo_jewry/ |title=EJP In Depth On Anglo Jewry |date=14 July 2006 |access-date=21 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060714100957/https://www.ejpress.org/digest/in_depth/on_anglo_jewry/ |archive-date=14 July 2006}}</ref>


After the French king ] declared ] illegal in 1685 with the ], an estimated 50,000 Protestant ]s fled to England.<ref></ref> Due to sustained and sometimes mass emigration from ], current estimates indicate that around 6 million people in the UK have at least one grandparent born in Ireland.<ref>'''' by Owen Bowcott '''The Guardian''', 13 September 2006. Retrieved 9 January 2006.</ref> After the French king ] declared ] illegal in 1685 in the ], an estimated 50,000 Protestant ]s fled to England.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.walden.org/Institute/thoreau/life/Geneology/Guillet-Thoreau.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927221059/https://www.walden.org/Institute/thoreau/life/Geneology/Guillet-Thoreau.htm |title=Meredith on the GuilletThoreau Genealogy |archive-date=27 September 2007}}</ref> Due to sustained and sometimes mass emigration of the ], current estimates indicate that around 6 million people in the UK have at least one grandparent born in the Republic of Ireland.<ref>'' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190105184315/https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2006/sep/13/britishidentity.travelnews |date=5 January 2019 }}'', Owen Bowcott, '']'', 13 September 2006. Retrieved 9 January 2006.</ref>


There has been a ] presence in England since at least the 16th century due to the ] and an Indian presence since the mid 19th century because of the ].<ref>'''', Asian and Black History in Britain, 1500-1850: '''UK government website'''. Retrieved 21 July 2006.</ref> ] and ] proportions have grown in England as immigration from the British Empire and the subsequent ] was encouraged due to labour shortages during post-war rebuilding.<ref> The National Archives Accessed October 2006</ref> There has been a small ] presence in England since the 16th century due to the ],<ref name="blackhistory">'' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211224165508/https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pathways/blackhistory/ |date=24 December 2021 }}'', Asian and Black History in Britain, 1500–1850: UK government website. Retrieved 21 July 2006.</ref> and a small ] presence since at least the 17th century because of the ]<ref>{{citation|title=Counterflows to Colonialism: Indian Traveller and Settler in Britain 1600–1857|first=Michael Herbert|last=Fisher|year=2006|publisher=Orient Blackswan|isbn=978-81-7824-154-8|pages=111–119, 129–130, 140, 154–156, 160–168, 172, 181}}</ref> and ].<ref name="blackhistory"/> ] and ] populations have only grown throughout the UK generally, as immigration from the British Empire and the subsequent ] was encouraged due to labour shortages during post World War II rebuilding.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211222025218/https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pathways/citizenship/brave_new_world/immigration.htm |date=22 December 2021 }} The National Archives Accessed October 2006</ref>
However, these groups are often still considered to be ethnic minorities and research has shown that black and Asian people in the UK are more likely to identify as British rather than with one of the state's four constituent nations, including England.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23386024-ethnic-minorities-more-likely-to-feel-british-than-white-people-says-research.do|title=Ethnic minorities more likely to feel British than white people, says research|work=Evening Standard|date=18 February 2007|accessdate=18 September 2010}}</ref> However, these groups are often still considered to be ethnic minorities and research has shown that black and Asian people in the UK are more likely to identify as British rather than with one of the state's four constituent nations, including England.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23386024-ethnic-minorities-more-likely-to-feel-british-than-white-people-says-research.do |title=Ethnic minorities more likely to feel British than white people, says research |work=] |date=18 February 2007 |access-date=18 September 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100211152221/https://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23386024-ethnic-minorities-more-likely-to-feel-british-than-white-people-says-research.do |archive-date=11 February 2010}}</ref>


A nationally representative survey published in June 2021 found that a majority of respondents thought that being English was not dependent on race. 77% of white respondents in England agreed that "Being English is open to people of different ethnic backgrounds who identify as English", whereas 14% were of the view that "Only people who are white count as truly English". Amongst ethnic minority respondents, the equivalent figures were 68% and 19%.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.britishfuture.org/english-identity-open-football-unites/ |title=English identity open to all, regardless of race, finds poll – and Three Lions is the symbol that unites us |publisher=British Future |date=9 June 2021 |access-date=29 October 2021 |archive-date=29 October 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211029154811/https://www.britishfuture.org/english-identity-open-football-unites/ |url-status=live}}</ref> Research has found that the proportion of people who consider being white to be a necessary component of Englishness has declined over time.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jun/30/being-english-not-about-colour-say-majority |title=Now 90% of England agrees: being English is not about colour |work=] |first=Inigo |last=Alexander |date=30 June 2019 |access-date=29 October 2021 |archive-date=29 October 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211029154809/https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jun/30/being-english-not-about-colour-say-majority |url-status=live}}</ref>
===Current national identity===
Some commentators have argued that since the late 1990s there has been a resurgence of English national identity.<ref name=Economist>{{cite news|url=http://www.economist.com/node/8599103?story_id=8599103|title=British identity: Waning|work=The Economist|date=25 January 2007|accessdate=9 February 2011}}</ref> Survey data shows a rise in the number of people in England describing their national identity as English and a fall in the number describing themselves as British.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/jan/24/labourleadership.britishidentity|title=When British isn't always best|work=The Guardian|date=24 January 2007|accessdate=9 February 2011}}</ref> This has been attributed to the ] in the late 1990s of some powers to the ] and ],<ref name=Economist/><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-430910/Dont-British-England.html|title=Don't call us British, we're from England|work=Daily Mail|first=Matthew|last=Hickley|date=23 January 2007|accessdate=9 February 2011}}</ref> although others question whether devolution has in fact led to a rise in English national identity and argue that survey data fails to portray the complex nature of national identities.<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://www.psych.lancs.ac.uk/people/uploads/SusanCondor20080120T164935.pdf|first1=Susan|last1=Condor|first2=Stephen|last2=Gibson|first3=Jackie|last3=Abell|year=2006|title=English identity and ethnic diversity in the context of UK constitutional change|journal=Ethnicities|volume=6|issue=2|pages=123–158|doi=10.1177/1468796806063748}}</ref> ] argues that "In the early years of devolution...there was little sign" of an English backlash against devolution for Scotland and Wales, but that more recently survey data shows tentative signs of "a form of English nationalism...beginning to emerge among the general public".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ippr.org.uk/members/download.asp?f=/ecomm/files/Is_An_English_Backlash_Emerging.pdf&a=skip|title=Is an English backlash emerging? Reactions to devolution ten years on|first=John|last=Curtice|publisher=Institute for Public Policy Research|date=February 2010|accessdate=9 February 2011|page=3}}</ref> Michael Kenny, ] and Richard Hayton, meanwhile, argue that the resurgence in English nationalism predates devolution, being observable in the early 1990s, but that this resurgence does not necessarily have negative implciations for the future of the UK as a political union.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ippr.org/members/download.asp?f=/ecomm/files/beyond_the_constitution.pdf&a=skip|title=Beyond the constitution? Englishness in a post-devolved Britain|first1=Michael|last1=Kenny|first2=Richard|last2=English|first3=Richard|last3=Hayton|publisher=Institute for Public Policy Research|date=February 2008|accessdate=9 February 2011|page=3}}</ref>


=== Current national and political identity ===
As England lacks its own devolved parliament, its laws are created only in the UK parliament, giving rise to the "]", a reference to the situation in which a law affecting only England can be voted for or against by non-English MPs.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/82358.stm|title=The West Lothian Question|publisher=BBC News|date=1 June 1998|accessdate=9 February 2011}}</ref> Consequently, groups such as the ] have called for the creation of a ], claiming that there is now a discriminatory democratic deficit against the English. A rise in English self-consciousness has resulted, with increased use of the ].<ref name=KK-262-290/> The establishment of an English parliament has also been backed by a number of Scottish and Welsh nationalists.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6081130.stm|title=Fresh call for English Parliament|publisher=BBC News|date=24 October 2006|accessdate=9 February 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6197143.stm|title=Welsh nod for English Parliament|publisher=BBC News|date=20 December 2006|accessdate=9 February 2011}}</ref> Writer ] has suggested that like most dominant groups, the English have only demonstrated interest in their ethnic self-definition when they were feeling oppressed.<ref>Quoted by Kumar, ''Making'', p.266.</ref>
The 1990s witnessed a resurgence of English national identity.<ref name=Economist>{{cite news|url=https://www.economist.com/node/8599103?story_id=8599103|title=British identity: Waning|newspaper=The Economist|date=25 January 2007|access-date=9 February 2011|archive-date=29 June 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629185013/http://www.economist.com/node/8599103?story_id=8599103|url-status=live}}</ref> Survey data shows a rise in the number of people in England describing their national identity as English and a fall in the number describing themselves as British.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/jan/24/labourleadership.britishidentity |title=When British isn't always best |work=] |location=London |date=24 January 2007 |access-date=9 February 2011 |archive-date=23 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131223183818/http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/jan/24/labourleadership.britishidentity |url-status=live}}</ref> Today, black and minority ethnic people of England still generally identify as British rather than English to a greater extent than their white counterparts;<ref>{{cite book |last1=Jones |first1=Richard Wyn |last2=Lodge |first2=Guy |last3=Jeffery |first3=Charlie |last4=Gottfried |first4=Glenn |last5=Scully |first5=Roger |last6=Henderson|first6=Ailsa|last7=Wincott |first7=Daniel |title=England and its Two Unions: The Anatomy of a Nation and its Discontents |date=July 2013 |publisher=] |url=https://www.ippr.org/assets/media/images/media/files/publication/2013/07/england-two-unions_Jul2013_11003.pdf |access-date=7 November 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141107200747/https://www.ippr.org/assets/media/images/media/files/publication/2013/07/england-two-unions_Jul2013_11003.pdf |archive-date=7 November 2014}}</ref> however, groups such as the ] (CEP) suggest the emergence of a broader civic and multi-ethnic English nationhood.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Kenny |first1=M |title=The politics of English Nationhood |date=2014 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0198778721 |pages=192–193}}</ref> Scholars and journalists have noted a rise in English self-consciousness, with increased use of the ], particularly at football matches where the ] was previously more commonly flown by fans.{{sfn|Kumar|2003|p=262}}<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1083305.ece |title=St George unfurls his flag (made in China) once again |work=] |location=London |first=Ben |last=Hoyle |date=8 June 2006 |access-date=10 February 2011 |archive-date=29 June 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629103715/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1083305.ece |url-status=dead}}</ref>


This perceived rise in English self-consciousness has generally been attributed to the ] in the late 1990s of some powers to the ] and ].<ref name=Economist/> In policy areas for which the devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have responsibility, the UK Parliament votes on laws that consequently only apply to England. Because the Westminster Parliament is composed of MPs from throughout the United Kingdom, this has given rise to the "]", a reference to the situation in which MPs representing constituencies outside England can vote on matters affecting only England, but MPs cannot vote on the same matters in relation to the other parts of the UK.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/82358.stm|title=The West Lothian Question|work=BBC News|date=1 June 1998|access-date=9 February 2011|archive-date=26 January 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110126133801/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/82358.stm|url-status=live}}</ref> Consequently, groups such as the CEP have called for the creation of a ], claiming that there is now a discriminatory democratic deficit against the English. The establishment of an English parliament has also been backed by a number of Scottish and Welsh nationalists.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6081130.stm|title=Fresh call for English Parliament|work=BBC News|date=24 October 2006|access-date=9 February 2011|archive-date=18 August 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120818214348/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6081130.stm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6197143.stm|title=Welsh nod for English Parliament|work=BBC News|date=20 December 2006|access-date=9 February 2011|archive-date=10 August 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120810023254/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6197143.stm|url-status=live}}</ref> Writer ] has suggested that like most dominant groups, the English have only demonstrated interest in their ethnic self-definition when they were feeling oppressed.<ref>Paul Johnson is quoted by Kumar {{harv|Kumar|2003|p=266}}</ref>
In the first five years of devolution for Scotland and Wales, support in England for the establishment of an English parliament was low at between 16 and 19 per cent.<ref>{{cite journal|first=Robert|last=Hazell|year=2006|title=The English Question|journal=Publius|volume=36|issue=1|pages=37–56|doi=10.1093/publius/pjj012}}</ref> While one 2007 poll carried out for ] '']'' found that 61 per cent would support such a parliament being established,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6264823.stm|title='Most' support English parliament|publisher=BBC|date=16 January 2007|accessdate=9 February 2011}}</ref> a report based on the ] published in December 2010 suggests that only 29 per cent of people in England support the establishment of an English parliament, though this figure had risen from 17 per cent in 2007.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.natcen.ac.uk/media/606961/nat%20british%20social%20attitudes%20survey%20summary%207.pdf|first1=Rachel|last1=Ormston|first2=John|last2=Curtice|title=Resentment or contentment? Attitudes towards the Union ten years on|publisher=National Centre for Social Research|date=December 2010|accessdate=9 February 2011}}</ref> Krishan Kumar notes that support for measures to ensure that only English MPs can vote on legislation that applies only to England is generally higher than that for the establishment of an English parliament, although support for both varies depending on the timing of the opinion poll and the wording of the question.<ref name="Kumar 2010">{{cite journal|first=Krishan|last=Kumar|year=2010|title=Negotiating English identity: Englishness, Britishness and the future of the United Kingdom|journal=Nations and Nationalism|volume=16|issue=3|pages=469–487|doi=10.1111/j.1469-8129.2010.00442.x}}</ref> Electoral support for English nationalist parties is also low, even though there is public support for many of the policies they espouse.<ref>{{cite journal|first=Colin|last=Copus|title=English national parties in post-devolution UK|journal=British Politics|volume=4|issue=3|year=2009|pages=363–385|doi=10.1057/bp.2009.12}}</ref> The ] gained just 64,826 votes in the ], accounting for 0.3 per cent of all votes cast in England.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/election2010/results/region/48.stm|title=Full England scoreboard|work=Election 2010|publisher=BBC News|accessdate=9 February 2011}}</ref> Kumar argues that "despite devolution and occasional bursts of English nationalism – more an expression of exasperation with the Scots or Northern Irish – the English remain on the whole satisfied with current constitutional arrangements".<ref name="Kumar 2010"/>


] argues that "In the early years of devolution...there was little sign" of an English backlash against devolution for Scotland and Wales, but that more recently survey data shows tentative signs of "a form of English nationalism...beginning to emerge among the general public".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ippr.org/files/images/media/files/publication/2011/05/Is_An_English_Backlash_Emerging_1753.pdf|title=Is an English backlash emerging? Reactions to devolution ten years on|first=John|last=Curtice|publisher=Institute for Public Policy Research|date=February 2010|page=3|access-date=16 April 2018|archive-date=17 April 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180417105306/https://www.ippr.org/files/images/media/files/publication/2011/05/Is_An_English_Backlash_Emerging_1753.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Michael Kenny, ] and Richard Hayton, meanwhile, argue that the resurgence in English nationalism predates devolution, being observable in the early 1990s, but that this resurgence does not necessarily have negative implications for the perception of the UK as a political union.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ippr.org/publications/beyond-the-constitution-englishness-in-a-post-devolved-britain|title=Beyond the constitution? Englishness in a post-devolved Britain|first1=Michael|last1=Kenny|first2=Richard|last2=English|first3=Richard|last3=Hayton|publisher=Institute for Public Policy Research|date=February 2008|page=3|access-date=16 April 2018|archive-date=17 April 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180417105327/https://www.ippr.org/publications/beyond-the-constitution-englishness-in-a-post-devolved-britain|url-status=live}}</ref> Others question whether devolution has led to a rise in English national identity at all, arguing that survey data fails to portray the complex nature of national identities, with many people considering themselves both English ''and'' British.{{sfn|Condor|Gibson|Abell|2006|p=128}} A 2017 survey by ] found that 38% of English voters considered themselves both English and British, alongside 19% who felt English but not British.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2017/01/24/what-makes-person-english-according-english|title=What makes a person English, according to the English &#124; YouGov|website=yougov.co.uk}}</ref>
==English ancestry abroad==
===English diaspora===
{{See|English American|Anglo-Argentine|English Canadian|English Chilean|Anglo-African|English Australian|New Zealand European}}


Recent surveys of public opinion on the establishment of an English parliament have given widely varying conclusions. In the first five years of devolution for Scotland and Wales, support in England for the establishment of an English parliament was low at between 16 and 19%, according to successive ]s.<ref>{{cite journal|first=Robert|last=Hazell|year=2006|title=The English Question|journal=Publius|volume=36|issue=1|pages=37–56|doi=10.1093/publius/pjj012}}</ref> A report, also based on the British Social Attitudes Survey, published in December 2010 suggests that only 29% of people in England support the establishment of an English parliament, though this figure had risen from 17% in 2007.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.natcen.ac.uk/media/606961/nat%20british%20social%20attitudes%20survey%20summary%207.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110601165641/http://www.natcen.ac.uk/media/606961/nat%20british%20social%20attitudes%20survey%20summary%207.pdf |archive-date=1 June 2011 |first1=Rachel |last1=Ormston |first2=John |last2=Curtice |title=Resentment or contentment? Attitudes towards the Union ten years on |publisher=National Centre for Social Research |date=December 2010 |access-date=9 February 2011 }}</ref>
From the earliest times English people have left England to settle in other parts of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, but it is not possible to identify their numbers, as British censuses have historically not invited respondents to identify themselves as English.<ref> (]; see p. 43)</ref> However, the census does record place of birth, revealing that 8.08% of Scotland's population,<ref>, accessed November 16, 2007.</ref> 3.66% of the population of ]<ref>, p. 10.</ref> and 20% of the Welsh population were born in England.<ref>, ''National Statistics'', 8 January 2004.</ref> Similarly, the census of the ] does not collect information on ethnicity, but it does record that there are over 200,000 people living in Ireland who were born in ].


One 2007 poll carried out for ] '']'', however, found that 61 per cent would support such a parliament being established.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6264823.stm |title='Most' support English parliament |publisher=] |date=16 January 2007 |access-date=9 February 2011 |archive-date=28 July 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110728040400/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6264823.stm |url-status=live}}</ref> Krishan Kumar notes that support for measures to ensure that only English MPs can vote on legislation that applies only to England is generally higher than that for the establishment of an English parliament, although support for both varies depending on the timing of the opinion poll and the wording of the question.{{sfn|Kumar|2010|p=484}} Electoral support for English nationalist parties is also low, even though there is public support for many of the policies they espouse.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Colin |last=Copus |title=English national parties in post-devolution UK |journal=] |volume=4 |issue=3 |year=2009 |pages=363–385 |doi=10.1057/bp.2009.12 |s2cid=153712090}}</ref> The ] gained just 64,826 votes in the ], accounting for 0.3 per cent of all votes cast in England.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/election2010/results/region/48.stm |title=Full England scoreboard |work=Election 2010 |publisher=] |access-date=9 February 2011 |archive-date=9 February 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110209104814/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/election2010/results/region/48.stm |url-status=live}}</ref> Kumar argued in 2010 that "despite devolution and occasional bursts of English nationalism – more an expression of exasperation with the Scots or Northern Irish – the English remain on the whole satisfied with current constitutional arrangements".{{sfn|Kumar|2010|p=478}}
] citizens who claim some English ancestry in the census. Dark red and brown colours indicate a higher density: highest in the northeast as well as Utah and surrounding areas. (see also ]).]]


== English diaspora ==
English emigrant and ethnic descent communities are found across the world, and in some places, settled in significant numbers. Substantial populations descended from English colonists and immigrants exist in the ], ], ], ] and ].
{{Main|English diaspora}}


{| class="wikitable sortable unsortable" style="float:right; font-size:90%"
In the ], 24,509,692 Americans described their ] as wholly or partly English. In addition, 1,035,133 recorded British ancestry.<ref>, table PHC-T-43.</ref> In the ] 50 million Americans claimed English ancestry.<ref>, American Demographics, December 1, 2001</ref>
|+ Numbers of the English diaspora
|-
! Year
! Country
! Population
! % of pop.
|-
| 2021
| Australia
| 8,385,928
| 33.0<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.abs.gov.au/census/find-census-data/quickstats/2021/AUS | title=2021 Australia, Census All persons QuickStats|website=Australian Bureau of Statistics|accessdate=27 July 2022}}</ref>
|-
| 2020
| United States
| 46,550,968
| 19.8<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/interactive/detailed-race-ethnicities-2020-census.html|title=Detailed Races and Ethnicities in the United States and Puerto Rico: 2020 Census|publisher=]|date= September 21, 2023|access-date=October 21, 2023}}</ref>
|-
| 2016
| Canada
| 6,320,085
| 18.3<ref name="Census Profile, 2016 Census"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210419200907/https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/details/page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=PR&Code1=01&Geo2=PR&Code2=01&Data=Count&SearchText=Canada&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR=01&B1=Ethnic%20origin&TABID=1&wbdisable=true |date=19 April 2021}} – Ethnic origin population</ref><ref name="auto3"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180521104815/https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/as-sa/fogs-spg/Facts-csd-eng.cfm?LANG=Eng&GK=CSD&GC=5933015&TOPIC=7 |date=21 May 2018 }} – 2016 Census</ref>
|-
| ]
| Scotland
| 459,486
| 8.7<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210512182531/https://www.scotlandscensus.gov.uk/ods-web/standard-outputs.html |date=12 May 2021 }}, Accessed 5 September 2014</ref>
|-
| ]
| New Zealand
| 72,204{{efn|Those who self-identified as English ethnic group}}–210,915{{efn|210915 listed their birthplace as England.}}
|4.5<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.stats.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/2018-Census-totals-by-topic/Download-data/2018-census-totals-by-topic-national-highlights.xlsx |title=2018 Census totals by topic |publisher=] |format=] spreadsheet |access-date=18 December 2019 |archive-date=13 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200413185957/https://www.stats.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/2018-Census-totals-by-topic/Download-data/2018-census-totals-by-topic-national-highlights.xlsx |url-status=live}}</ref>
|}


From the earliest times, English people have left England to settle in other parts of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. It is impossible to identify their numbers, as British censuses have historically not invited respondents to identify themselves as English.<ref> (]; see p. 43) {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070926131304/https://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/grosweb/grosweb.nsf/pages/file5/%24file/supporting_information.pdf |date=26 September 2007}}</ref>{{Failed verification|date=September 2022}} However, the census does record place of birth, revealing that 8.1% of Scotland's population,<ref>. Retrieved 16 November 2007. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071011034257/https://www.scrol.gov.uk/scrol/browser/profile.jsp |date=11 October 2007 }}</ref> 3.7% of the population of Northern Ireland<ref>, p. 10. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071127021255/https://www.nisranew.nisra.gov.uk/census/pdf/Key%20Statistics%20ReportTables.pdf |date=27 November 2007 }}</ref> and 20% of the Welsh population were born in England.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110824122543/http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=445 |date=24 August 2011 }}, ''National Statistics'', 8 January 2004.</ref> Similarly, the census of the Republic of Ireland does not collect information on ethnicity, but it does record that there are over 200,000 people living in Ireland who were born in ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cso.ie/census/documents/PDR%202006%20Tables%2019-30.pdf|title=Table 19 Enumerated population classified by usual residence and sex|website=Webcitation.org|access-date=21 August 2017|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090915011616/http://www.cso.ie/census/documents/PDR%202006%20Tables%2019-30.pdf|archive-date=15 September 2009}}</ref>
In the ], 'English' was the most common ethnic origin (ethnic origin refers to the ethnic or cultural group(s) to which the respondent's ancestors belong<ref> ]</ref>) recorded by respondents; 6,570,015 people described themselves as wholly or partly English, 16% of the population.<ref>Staff. , ''Statistics Canada'', 2006.</ref> On the other hand people identifying as Canadian but not English may have previously identified as English before the option of identifying as Canadian was available.<ref>According to , (p.7) "...the presence of the Canadian example has led to an increase in Canadian being reported and has had an impact on the counts of other groups, especially for French, English, Irish and Scottish. People who previously reported these origins in the census had the tendency to now report Canadian."</ref>


English ethnic descent and emigrant communities are found primarily in the ], and settled in significant numbers in some areas. Substantial populations descended from English colonists and immigrants exist in the United States, Canada, Australia, South Africa and New Zealand.{{citation needed|date=March 2023}}
In ], the ] recorded 6,298,945 people who described their ancestry, but not ethnicity, as 'English'. 1,425,559 of these people recorded that both their parents were born overseas.


=== United States ===
Significant numbers of people with at least some English ] also live in ] and ], as well as in ], ], ], ], and ]. Most of the ] are in fact British Pakistanis from England who have returned to their ancestral country.{{citation needed|date=October 2010}}
{{Main|English Americans}}


], known as the "Father of His Country", and first ], had English ].<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RMhYAAAAMAAJ&q=english+ancestry+of+george+washington |title=An examination of the English ancestry of George Washington, setting forth the evidence to connect him with the Washingtons of Sulgrave and Brington |publisher=Boston, Printed for the New England historic genealogical society |year=1889 |access-date=18 December 2019 |archive-date=3 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210203000927/https://books.google.com/books?id=RMhYAAAAMAAJ&q=english+ancestry+of+george+washington |url-status=live |via=]}}</ref>]]
Since the 1980s there have been increasingly large numbers of English people, estimated at over 3 million, permanently or semi-permanently living in ] and ], drawn there by the climate and cheaper house prices.<ref> by Giles Tremlett. ''The Guardian'', Friday 24 July 2009</ref>


In the ], English Americans were the largest group in the United States with 46.5 million Americans self-identifying as having some English origins (many combined with another heritage) representing (19.8%) of the ] population. This includes 25.5 million (12.5%) who were "English alone" - one origin.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/interactive/detailed-race-ethnicities-2020-census.html|title=Detailed Races and Ethnicities in the United States and Puerto Rico: 2020 Census|publisher=]|date= September 21, 2023|access-date= December 23, 2023}}</ref> However, ] regard this as an undercount, as the index of inconsistency{{clarify|date=November 2020}} is high, and many, if not most, people from English stock have a tendency (since the introduction of a new 'American' category and ignoring the ancestry question in the 2000 census) to identify as simply ]<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151016002633/https://books.google.com/books?id=SVoAXh-dNuYC&pg=PA57&dq=Sharing+the+dream:+white+males+in+multicultural+America++english+ancestry&cd=1 |date=16 October 2015 }} By Dominic J. Pulera.</ref><ref>Reynolds Farley, 'The New Census Question about Ancestry: What Did It Tell Us?', ''Demography'', Vol. 28, No. 3 (August 1991), pp. 414, 421.</ref><ref>Stanley Lieberson and Lawrence Santi, 'The Use of Nativity Data to Estimate Ethnic Characteristics and Patterns', ''Social Science Research'', Vol. 14, No. 1 (1985), pp. 44–46.</ref><ref>Stanley Lieberson and Mary C. Waters, 'Ethnic Groups in Flux: The Changing Ethnic Responses of American Whites', ''Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science'', Vol. 487, No. 79 (September 1986), pp. 82–86.</ref> or if of mixed European ancestry, identify with a more recent and differentiated ethnic group.<ref>Mary C. Waters, ''Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America'' (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990), p. 36.</ref>
==Culture==
{{Expand section|date=September 2009}}
{{further|]}}
The culture of England is sometimes difficult to separate clearly from the culture of the United Kingdom,<ref></ref> so influential has English culture been on the cultures of the ] and, on the other hand, given the extent to which other cultures have influenced life in England.


Prior to this, in the ], 24,509,692 Americans described their ] as wholly or partly English. In addition, 1,035,133 recorded British ancestry.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170118082243/http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/tablist.html |date=18 January 2017 }}, table PHC-T-43.</ref> This was a numerical decrease from the census in ] where 32,651,788 people or 13.1% of the population self-identified with English ancestry.<ref>{{cite web|title=1990 Census of Population Detailed Ancestry Groups for States|url=https://www.census.gov/prod/cen1990/cp-s/cp-s-1-2.pdf|publisher=]|access-date=30 November 2012|date=18 September 1992|archive-date=27 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170727091052/https://www.census.gov/prod/cen1990/cp-s/cp-s-1-2.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
==See also==

{{columns
In ], over 49 million (49,598,035) Americans claimed English ancestry, at the time around 26.3% of the total population and largest reported group which, even today, would make them the largest ethnic group in the United States.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov/population/censusdata/pc80-s1-10/tab02.pdf|work=1980 United States Census|title=Table 2: Persons Who Reported at Least One Specific Ancestry Group for the United States: 1980|access-date=20 December 2017|archive-date=4 June 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604160009/http://www.census.gov/population/censusdata/pc80-s1-10/tab02.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> ] are descendants of ] and ] (specifically: ], ], ] and ]) settlers who colonised Ireland during the ] in the 17th century.
|col1width=12em

|col1 =
] of English heritage are often seen, and identify, as simply "American" due to the many historic cultural ties between England and the U.S. and their influence on the country's population. Relative to ethnic groups of other European origins, this may be due to the early establishment of English settlements; as well as to non-English groups having emigrated in order to establish significant communities.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160110054549/https://books.google.com/books?id=SoOXrMVp5BsC&pg=PA37&dq=english+ancestry+united+states&cd=2#v=onepage&q=english%20ancestry%20united%20states&f=false |date=10 January 2016 }} by Stanley Lieberson</ref>
* ]

=== Canada ===
{{Main|English Canadians}}

In the ], 'English' was the most common ethnic origin (ethnic origin refers to the ethnic or cultural group(s) to which the respondent's ancestors belong<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www12.statcan.ca/english/census01/Products/Reference/dict/pop040.htm |title=Ethnic Origin |website=2001 Census |publisher=] |date=4 November 2002 |access-date=8 January 2009 |archive-date=13 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171213045202/https://www12.statcan.ca/English/census01/products/reference/dict/pop040.htm }}</ref>) recorded by respondents; 6,320,085 people or 18.3% of the population self-identified themselves as wholly or partly English.<ref name="Census Profile, 2016 Census" /><ref name="auto3" /> On the other hand, people identifying as Canadian but not English may have previously identified as English before the option of identifying as Canadian was available.<ref>{{cite book |url-status=dead |url=https://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/analysis/ethnicorigin/pdf/97-562-XIE2006001.pdf |title=Canada's Ethnocultural Mosaic, 2006 Census |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090325070623/https://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/analysis/ethnicorigin/pdf/97-562-XIE2006001.pdf |archive-date=25 March 2009 |page=7 |quote=the presence of the Canadian example has led to an increase in Canadian being reported and has had an impact on the counts of other groups, especially for French, English, Irish and Scottish. People who previously reported these origins in the census had the tendency to now report Canadian. |date=April 2008 |isbn=978-0-662-48324-3 |last1=Chui |first1=Tina |publisher=Statistics Canada }}</ref>

=== Australia ===
{{Main|English Australians}}

] and ], 1st and 2nd ] both had English parents.]]

From the beginning of the ] until the mid-20th century, the vast majority of settlers to Australia were from the ], with the English being the dominant group. Among the leading ancestries, increases in Australian, Irish and German ancestries and decreases in English, Scottish and Welsh ancestries appear to reflect such shifts in perception or reporting. These reporting shifts at least partly resulted from changes in the design of the census question, in particular the introduction of a tick box format in 2001.<ref name="abs.gov.au">{{cite web |url=https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/7d12b0f6763c78caca257061001cc588/af5129cb50e07099ca2570eb0082e462!OpenDocument |title= Population characteristics: Ancestry of Australia's population |publisher=Australian Bureau of Statistics |work=4102.0 - Australian Social Trends, 2003 |access-date=21 August 2017 |date=3 June 2003 |archive-date=3 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170903141424/http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/7d12b0f6763c78caca257061001cc588/af5129cb50e07099ca2570eb0082e462!OpenDocument |url-status=live}}</ref> English Australians have more often come from the ] than the ].<ref>J. Jupp, The English in Australia, Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 103</ref>

] of English descent, are both the single largest ethnic group in Australia and the largest 'ancestry' identity in the Australian census.<ref name="Census2016-036">{{cite web |url=https://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/quickstat/036 |title=Census 2016: Summary of result – Population by states and territories, 2011 and 2016 Census |work=] |publisher=Australian Government |access-date=21 February 2022 |archive-date=20 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180620052901/http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/quickstat/036 |url-status=live}}</ref> In the ], 7.8 million or 36.1% of the population identified as "English" or a combination including English, a numerical increase from 7.2 million over the 2011 census figure. The census also documented 907,572 residents or 3.9% of Australia as being born in England, and are the largest overseas-born population.<ref name="auto2"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211007045837/https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/2071.0~2016~Main%20Features~Cultural%20Diversity%20Data%20Summary~30 |date=7 October 2021}} – Ancestry 2016</ref>

=== New Zealand ===
{{see also|English New Zealanders|Pākehā settlers}}

English ancestry is the largest single ancestry New Zealanders share. Several million New Zealanders are estimated to have some English ancestry<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.teara.govt.nz/NewZealanders/NewZealandPeoples/English/en |title=English – Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand |date=20 September 2008 |website= |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080920092946/http://www.teara.govt.nz/NewZealanders/NewZealandPeoples/English/en |archive-date=20 September 2008 }}</ref> From 1840, the English comprised the largest single group among New Zealand's overseas-born, consistently being over 50 percent of the total population.<ref name="auto4">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YFF8ynVL4wIC&q=new+zealand+foundational+culture+was+english&pg=PA151 |title=Locating the English Diaspora 1500–2010 |first1=Tanja |last1=Bueltmann |first2=David T. |last2=Gleeson |first3=Donald M. |last3=MacRaild |date=2010 |publisher=Liverpool University Press |isbn=978-1846318191 |access-date=27 March 2020 |archive-date=14 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210814111713/https://books.google.com/books?id=YFF8ynVL4wIC&q=new+zealand+foundational+culture+was+english&pg=PA151 |url-status=live |via=]}}</ref>
Despite this, after the early 1850s, the English-born slowly fell from being a majority of the colonial population. In the ], 50.5% of the total population were born in England, this proportion fell to 36.5% (1861) and 24.3% by 1881.<ref name="auto4"/> ]'s foundational culture was ], given the strong representation in the mid and late-nineteenth century with the English being the largest in migration inflows.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YFF8ynVL4wIC&q=new+zealand+foundational+culture+was+english&pg=PA151|title=Locating the English Diaspora 1500-2010|first1=Tanja|last1=Bueltmann|first2=David T.|last2=Gleeson|first3=Donald M.|last3=MacRaild|year=2012|publisher=Liverpool University Press |isbn=9781846318191}}</ref>

In the ] census, there were 215,589 English-born representing 21.5% of all overseas-born residents or 5 percent of the total population and the most-common birthplace outside New Zealand.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nbr.co.nz/sites/default/files/2013%20Census%20QuickStats%20about%20culture%20and%20identity.pdf |title=Birthplace (detailed) For the census usually resident population count 2001, 2006, and 2013 Censuses Table 11 |access-date=27 March 2020 |archive-date=8 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200208223922/https://www.nbr.co.nz/sites/default/files/2013%20Census%20QuickStats%20about%20culture%20and%20identity.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref>
In the recent ], 210,915 were born in England or 4.49% of the total population, a slight decrease from 2013.<ref name="results">{{cite web|url=https://www.stats.govt.nz/information-releases/2018-census-population-and-dwelling-counts|title=2018 Census population and dwelling counts|website=Stats NZ|date=23 Sep 2019|access-date=5 January 2021|df=dmy-all}}</ref>

=== Argentina ===
{{Main|English Argentines}}

] was an Argentine author, naturalist, and ornithologist of English origin.]]
English settlers arrived in ] in 1806 (then a Spanish colony) in small numbers, mostly as businessmen, when ] was an emerging nation and the settlers were welcomed for the stability they brought to commercial life. As the 19th century progressed, more English families arrived, and many bought land to develop the potential of the Argentine pampas for the large-scale growing of crops. The English founded banks, developed the export trade in crops and animal products and imported the luxuries that the growing Argentine middle classes sought.<ref name="BSIA001">{{cite news |title=Emigration of Scots, English and Welsh-speaking people to Argentina in the nineteenth century |publisher=British Settlers in Argentina – studies in 19th and 20th century emigration |url=https://www.argbrit.org/ |access-date=8 January 2008 |archive-date=30 January 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080130010420/http://www.argbrit.org/ |url-status=live}}</ref>

As well as those who went to ] as industrialists and major landowners, others went as ], ]s and to work in ]ing and ]. Others went to become ]s, ] and simply to seek out a future. English families sent second and younger sons, or what were described as the ] of the family, to Argentina to make their fortunes in ] and ]. English settlers introduced ] to Argentina. Some English families owned ].{{citation needed|date=February 2020}}

=== Chile ===
{{Main|English Chileans}}

Since the Port of Valparaíso opened its coasts to free trade in 1811, the English began to congregate in Valparaíso. The English eventually numbered more than 32,000 during the port of Valparaíso's boom period during the saltpeter bonanza at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries.{{citation needed|date=September 2023}}

== Culture ==
{{Main|Culture of England}}
The culture of England is sometimes difficult to separate clearly from the ],<ref>{{cite web |last=Carr |first=Raymond |title=The invention of Great Britain: A review of ''The Making of English Identity'' by Krishnan Kumar |work=] |location=UK |year=2003 |url=https://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3724/is_200304/ai_n9229004/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111111145323/https://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3724/is_200304/ai_n9229004/|archive-date=11 November 2011}}</ref> so influential has English culture been on the cultures of the British Isles and, on the other hand, given the extent to which other cultures have influenced life in England.

=== Religion ===
{{Main|Religion in England}}

], Somerset]]

The ] of the realm is the ], whose titular head is ] although the worldwide ] is overseen by the ] of its bishops under the authority of ]. 26 of the church's 42 bishops are ], representing the church in the ]. In 2010, the Church of England counted 25&nbsp;million baptised members out of the 41&nbsp;million Christians in Great Britain's population of about 60&nbsp;million;<ref name=londontimes>{{cite news |url=https://timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/article1386939.ece |location=London |work=] |first=Ruth |last=Gledhill |title=Catholics set to pass Anglicans as leading UK church |date=15 February 2007 |access-date=18 February 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110918151400/https://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/article1386939.ece |archive-date=18 September 2011}}</ref><ref name=beeboop>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/11297461|title=How many Catholics are there in Britain? |date=15 September 2010 |access-date=18 February 2015 |work=] |location=London |archive-date=27 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190327235820/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/11297461 |url-status=live}}</ref> around the same time, it also claimed to baptise one in eight newborn children.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.churchofengland.org/media/1333106/2009churchstatistics.pdf |title=2009 Church Statistics |publisher=] |date=2009 |access-date=21 February 2022 |archive-date=8 April 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160408100014/https://www.churchofengland.org/media/1333106/2009churchstatistics.pdf }}</ref> Generally, anyone in England may marry or be buried at their local ], whether or not they have been baptised in the church.<ref>See the pages linked from {{cite web|url=https://www.cofe.anglican.org/lifeevents/|title=Life Events|publisher=Church of England|access-date=31 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101122050046/https://www.cofe.anglican.org/lifeevents/|archive-date=22 November 2010}}.</ref> Actual attendance has declined steadily since 1890,<ref>{{cite book|first=Peter J.|last= Bowler|title=Reconciling science and religion: the debate in early-twentieth-century Britain|location=Chicago|publisher=University of Chicago Press|date=2001|page=194}}.</ref> with around one million, or 10% of the baptised population attending Sunday services on a regular basis (defined as once a month or more) and three million -roughly 15%- joining Christmas Eve and Christmas services.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.churchofengland.org/about-us/facts-stats.aspx|title=Facts and Stats|publisher=Church of England|access-date=21 February 2022|archive-date=27 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170927233703/https://www.churchofengland.org/about-us/facts-stats.aspx|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.churchofengland.org/about-us/facts-stats/research-statistics.aspx|title=Research and Statistics|publisher=Church of England|access-date=9 May 2012|archive-date=8 May 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120508151433/http://churchofengland.org/about-us/facts-stats/research-statistics.aspx|url-status=live}}.</ref>
] at an event in ] in 2010.]]
] is recognised as the ] of England, and the ] consists of ]. Before ], the patron saint was ]; and ] is also honoured as England's ].
A survey carried out in the end of 2008 by ] on behalf of ] found the population of England and Wales to be 47.0% affiliated with the ], which is also the ], 9.6% with the ] and 8.7% were other Christians, mainly ] ] and ]. 4.8% were Muslim, 3.4% were members of other religions, 5.3% were agnostics, 6.8% were atheists and 15.0% were not sure about their religious affiliation or refused to answer to the question.<ref name="2009 ipsos">{{Cite journal |date=November 2009 |title=Understanding the 21st Century Catholic Community |url=https://www.catholicvoices.org.uk/sites/default/files/Cafod%20Research.pdf |journal=CAFOD, Ipsos MORI |access-date=31 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160915130148/https://catholicvoices.org.uk/sites/default/files/Cafod%20Research.pdf |archive-date=15 September 2016 }}</ref>

Religious observance of ] (23 April) changes when it is too close to ]. According to the ]'s calendar, when St George's Day falls between ] and the Second Sunday of Easter inclusive, it is moved to the Monday after the Second Sunday of Easter.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.lawandreligionuk.com/2019/04/24/st-georges-day-church-and-state/ |title=St George's Day: Church and State |first=David |last=Pocklington |date=24 April 2019 |access-date=18 December 2019 |archive-date=18 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191218031818/https://www.lawandreligionuk.com/2019/04/24/st-georges-day-church-and-state/ |url-status=live}}</ref>

=== Language ===
{{See also|Old English|English language in England}}
[[File:Local pronunciations of bath in England.jpg|thumb|Map showing phonological variation within England of the vowel in ''bath'', ''grass'', and ''dance'':
{{legend|#4F4F4F|'a' {{IPA||cat=no}}}}
{{legend|#819049|'aa' {{IPA|}}}}
{{legend|#D56371|'ah' {{IPA|}}}}
{{legend|#9C4B29|anomalies}}]]

English people traditionally speak the ], a member of the ] ]. The modern English language evolved from ] (the form of language in use by the English people from the 12th to the 15th century); Middle English was influenced lexically by Norman-French, ] and ]. In the Middle English period Latin was the language of administration and the nobility spoke Norman French. Middle English was itself derived from the ] of the Anglo-Saxon period; in the Northern and Eastern parts of England the language of Danish settlers had influenced the language, a fact still evident in Northern English dialects.{{citation needed|date=September 2023}}

There were once many different dialects of modern English in England, which were recorded in projects such as the '']'' (late 19th century) and the ] (mid 20th century), but there has been widespread ] in recent time as a result of education, the media and socio-economic pressures.<ref>Wolfgang Vierick (1964), ''Der English Dialect Survey und der Linguistic Survey of Scotland – Arbeitsmethoden und bisherige Ergebnisse'', Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 31, 333–335 in {{cite book |last=Shorrocks |first=Graham |year=1999 |title=A Grammar of the Dialect of the Bolton Area, Part 1 |location=Frankfurt am Main |publisher=Peter Lang |isbn=3-631-33066-9 |page=58}}</ref>

], a ], is one of three existing Brittonic languages; its usage has been revived in ]. Historically, another Brittonic Celtic language, ], was spoken in ] in ], but it died out in the 11th century although traces of it can still be found in the Cumbrian dialect. ] began in the late 15th century with the introduction of the ] to London and the ]. Through the worldwide influence of the ], English spread around the world from the 17th to mid-20th centuries. Through newspapers, books, the telegraph, the telephone, phonograph records, radio, satellite television, broadcasters (such as the ]) and the Internet, as well as the emergence of the United States as a global superpower, Modern English has become the ] of ], ], ], ], ], and ].{{sfn|The Routes of English}}

=== Literature ===
{{Main|English literature}}
{{Original research section|date=February 2020}}{{Unreferenced section|date=February 2020}}

], he is best known for '']''.]]

English literature begins with ], which was written in ] and produced epic works such as ] and the fragmentary ], ] and ]. For many years, ] and ] were the preferred literary languages of England, but in the ] there was a flourishing of literature in ]; ] is the most famous writer of this period.{{cn|date=December 2024}}

The ] is sometimes described as the golden age of English literature with writers such as ], ], ], ], ] and ].{{cn|date=December 2024}}

Other famous English writers include ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and the ].{{cn|date=December 2024}}

In 2003, the ] carried out a UK survey entitled '']'' in order to find the "nation's best-loved novel" of all time, with works by English novelists ], ], ], ] and ] making up the top five on the list.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/bigread/top100.shtml |work=] |title=The Big Read – Top 100 Books |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121031065136/http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/bigread/top100.shtml |archive-date=31 October 2012 |access-date=27 November 2010}}</ref>

== See also ==
{{portal|England}}
{{Div col}}
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
|col2width=20em
* ]
|col2 =
* ]
* ] &nbsp;<small>(historical estimates)</small>
* '']'' &nbsp;<small>(] TV programme, 2006)</small>
|col3width=21em
|col3 =
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
}}
* ] &nbsp;<small>(historical estimates)</small>
* '']'' &nbsp;<small>(] TV programme, 2006)</small>
* ]
* ]

{{div col end}}


'''Language:''' '''Language:'''
{{Div col}}
* ] * ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
{{div col end}}


'''Diaspora:''' '''Diaspora:'''
{{Div col}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
{{div col end}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


==References== == Notes ==
{{Reflist|3}} {{Notelist}}


==Bibliography== == References ==
=== Citations ===
* Great for tracking down historical inhabitants of England.
{{Reflist|35em}}
* {{cite book |title=Watching the English |author=Kate Fox |year=2004 |publisher=Hodder & Stoughton |isbn=0340818867}}

* {{cite book |title=The Making of English National Identity |author=Krishan Kumar |year=2003 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=0521777364}}
=== Sources ===
* {{cite book |title=The English |author=Jeremy Paxman |year=1999 |publisher=Penguin Books Ltd |isbn=0140267239}}
{{refbegin}}
* {{cite book |title=The Idea of English Ethnicity |author=] |year=2008 |publisher=Blackwell Publishers |isbn=1-4051-0129-6}}
* {{Cite web |url=https://www.pricegen.com/english_genealogy.html |title=Expert Links: English Family History and Genealogy |website=Price and Associates: Professional Genealogy and Family History Services |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081210171214/https://www.pricegen.com/english_genealogy.html |archive-date=10 December 2008}}
* Articles on England and the English
* {{cite journal |last1=Condor |first1=Susan |url=https://www.psych.lancs.ac.uk/people/uploads/SusanCondor20080120T164935.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110921055829/http://www.psych.lancs.ac.uk/people/uploads/SusanCondor20080120T164935.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-date=21 September 2011 |first2=Stephen |last2=Gibson |first3=Jackie |last3=Abell |year=2006 |title=English identity and ethnic diversity in the context of UK constitutional change |journal=] |volume=6 |issue=2 |pages=123–158 |doi=10.1177/1468796806063748 |s2cid=145498328 }}
* Information on England
* {{cite book |last=Fox |first=Kate |title=Watching the English |year=2004 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-340-81886-2 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/watchingenglishh00foxk |ref=none}}
* Map of England ("Anglia") circa 1564.
* {{cite book |last=Kumar |first=Krishan |author-link=Krishan Kumar (sociologist) |title=The Making of English National Identity |year=2003 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-521-77736-0}}
* ; BBC; 3 December 2001.
* {{cite journal |last=Kumar |first=Krishan |author-link=Krishan Kumar (sociologist) |year=2010 |title=Negotiating English identity: Englishness, Britishness and the future of the United Kingdom |journal=] |volume=16 |issue=3 |pages=469–487 |doi=10.1111/j.1469-8129.2010.00442.x}}
* showing 49,138,831 people from all ethnic groups living in England.
* {{cite book |last=Paxman |first=Jeremy |author-link=Jeremy Paxman |title=The English |year=1999 |publisher=] Ltd |isbn=978-0-14-026723-5 |ref=none}}
* ; The Telegraph; 23 April 2001.
* {{cite web |title=The Routes of English |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/routesofenglish/storysofar/programme4_6.shtml |date=1 August 2015 |website=BBC |ref={{harvid|The Routes of English}} |access-date=9 August 2015 |archive-date=24 October 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151024081346/http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/routesofenglish/storysofar/programme4_6.shtml |url-status=live }}
* ; CNSNews.com; 23 April 2001.
* {{cite book |last=Young |first=Robert J.C. |title=The Idea of English Ethnicity |year=2008 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-4051-0129-5 |author-link=Robert J.C. Young |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/ideaofenglisheth0000youn |ref=none}}
* – an anthropologist's look at the hidden rules of English behaviour.
{{refend}}
* , by ].

* Geoff Boxell
; Diaspora
* BBC
{{refbegin}}
* Article on the common English and Irish ethnicity
* {{cite book |editor1-last=Bueltmann |editor1-first=Tanja |editor2-last=Gleeson |editor2-first=David T. |editor3-last=MacRaild |editor3-first=Donald M. |title=Locating the English Diaspora, 1500–2010 |publisher=] |date=2012 |isbn=9781781387061}}
*
{{refend}}
*

== External links ==
* {{Wikiquote-inline}}


{{England topics}} {{England topics}}
{{British peoples}} {{British peoples}}
{{British Isles}} {{British Isles}}

{{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:English People}} {{DEFAULTSORT:English People}}
<!--Categories-->
]<!--Keep with index at start of list (eponymous category)--> ]<!--Keep with index at start of list (eponymous category)-->
] ]
]
]
]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 20:37, 5 January 2025

Ethnic group native to England For other uses, see Demographics of England, English-speaking world, Englishman (disambiguation), and The English (TV series). "English nation" redirects here. For the country of the United Kingdom, see England. "Englander" redirects here. For the surname, see Englander (surname).

Ethnic group
English people
Regions with significant populations
United Kingdom:
37.6 million in
England and Wales (2011)
Significant English diaspora in
United States46.5 million (2020)
Australia8.3 million (2021)
Canada6.3 million (2016)
New Zealand210,915 (2018)
South Africa40,000–1.6 million (2011)
Languages
English, British Sign
Religion
Christianity, traditionally Anglicanism, but also non-conformists and dissenters (see History of the Church of England), as well as other Protestants; also Roman Catholicism (see Catholic Emancipation); Islam (see Islam in England); Judaism, Irreligion, and other faiths (see Religion in England)
Related ethnic groups

English American, English Australian, English Canadian, British diaspora in Africa, English New Zealander, Anglo-Indians
Part of a series on
English people
Culture
Music
Language
Cuisine
Dance
Religion
People
Diaspora
Culture of England
History
People
Languages
Traditions
Mythology and folklore
Cuisine
Festivals
Religion
Art
Literature
Music and performing arts
Media
Sport
Monuments
Symbols
Part of a series on the
Culture of the United Kingdom
History
PeopleHistoric peoples

Modern ethnicities

Languages
Mythology and folklore
Cuisine
Festivals
Religion
Art
Literature
Music and performing arts
Media
Sport
Monuments
Symbols

The English people are an ethnic group and nation native to England, who speak the English language, a West Germanic language, and share a common ancestry, history, and culture. The English identity began with the Anglo-Saxons, when they were known as the Angelcynn, meaning race or tribe of the Angles. Their ethnonym is derived from the Angles, one of the Germanic peoples who invaded Britain around the 5th century AD.

The English largely descend from two main historical population groups: the West Germanic tribes, including the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes who settled in Southern Britain following the withdrawal of the Romans, and the partially Romanised Celtic Britons who already lived there. Collectively known as the Anglo-Saxons, they founded what was to become the Kingdom of England by the 10th century, in response to the invasion and extensive settlement of Danes and other Norsemen that began in the late 9th century. This was followed by the Norman Conquest and limited settlement of Normans in England in the late 11th century and a sizeable number of French Protestants who emigrated between the 16th and 18th centuries. Some definitions of English people include, while others exclude, people descended from later migration into England.

England is the largest and most populous country of the United Kingdom. The majority of people living in England are British citizens. In the Acts of Union 1707, the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland merged to become the Kingdom of Great Britain. Over the years, English customs and identity have become fairly closely aligned with British customs and identity in general. The demonyms for men and women from England are Englishman and Englishwoman.

English nationality

England itself has no devolved government. The 1990s witnessed a rise in English self-awareness. This is linked to the expressions of national self-awareness of the other British nations of Wales, Scotland and, to some extent, Northern Ireland which take their most solid form in the new devolved political arrangements within the United Kingdom – and the waning of a shared British national identity with the growing distance between the end of the British Empire and the present.

Many recent immigrants to England have assumed a solely British identity, while others have developed dual or mixed identities. Use of the word "English" to describe Britons from ethnic minorities in England is complicated by most non-white people in England identifying as British rather than English. In their 2004 Annual Population Survey, the Office for National Statistics compared the ethnic identities of British people with their perceived national identity. They found that while 58% of white people in England described their nationality as "English", non-white people were more likely to describe themselves as "British". However, in the 2021 United Kingdom census, 58.4% of respondants identified as "British" instead of "English" to 14.9%. Although, the Office for National Statistics states the reason for this change may partially be true, it is most likely due to changes to the question structure where "British" became the top response option in 2021 for England only.

Relationship to Britishness

It is unclear how many British people consider themselves English. The words "English" and "British" are often incorrectly used interchangeably, especially outside the UK. In his study of English identity, Krishan Kumar describes a common slip of the tongue in which people say "English, I mean British". He notes that this slip is normally made only by the English themselves and by foreigners: "Non-English members of the United Kingdom rarely say 'British' when they mean 'English'". Kumar suggests that although this blurring is a sign of England's dominant position with the UK, it is also "problematic for the English when it comes to conceiving of their national identity. It tells of the difficulty that most English people have of distinguishing themselves, in a collective way, from the other inhabitants of the British Isles".

In 1965, the historian A. J. P. Taylor wrote,

When the Oxford History of England was launched a generation ago, "England" was still an all-embracing word. It meant indiscriminately England and Wales; Great Britain; the United Kingdom; and even the British Empire. Foreigners used it as the name of a Great Power and indeed continue to do so. Bonar Law, by origin a Scotch Canadian, was not ashamed to describe himself as "Prime Minister of England" Now terms have become more rigorous. The use of "England" except for a geographic area brings protests, especially from the Scotch.

However, although Taylor believed this blurring effect was dying out, in his book The Isles: A History (1999), Norman Davies lists numerous examples in history books of "British" still being used to mean "English" and vice versa.

In December 2010, Matthew Parris in The Spectator, analysing the use of "English" over "British", argued that English identity, rather than growing, had existed all along but has recently been unmasked from behind a veneer of Britishness.

Historical and genetic origins

Further information: Genetic history of the British Isles

Replacement of Neolithic farmers by Bell Beaker populations

English people, like most Europeans, largely descend from three distinct lineages: Mesolithic hunter-gatherers, descended from a Cro-Magnon population that arrived in Europe about 45,000 years ago; Neolithic farmers who migrated from Anatolia during the Neolithic Revolution 9,000 years ago; and Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists who expanded into Europe from the Pontic–Caspian steppe in the context of Indo-European migrations 5,000 years ago.

Recent genetic studies have suggested that Britain's Neolithic population was largely replaced by a population from North Continental Europe characterised by the Bell Beaker culture around 2400 BC, associated with the Yamnaya people from the Pontic-Caspian Steppe. This population lacked genetic affinity to some other Bell Beaker populations, such as the Iberian Bell Beakers, but appeared to be an offshoot of the Corded Ware single grave people, as developed in Western Europe. It is currently unknown whether these Beaker peoples went on to develop Celtic languages in the British Isles, or whether later Celtic migrations introduced Celtic languages to Britain.

The close genetic affinity of these Beaker people to Continental North Europeans means that British and Irish populations cluster genetically very closely with other Northwest European populations, regardless of how much Anglo-Saxon and Viking ancestry was introduced during the 1st millennium.

Anglo-Saxons, Vikings and Normans

Main article: Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain
The Incipit to Matthew from the Book of Lindisfarne, an Insular masterpiece

The influence of later invasions and migrations on the English population has been debated, as studies that sampled only modern DNA have produced uncertain results and have thus been subject to a large variety of interpretations. More recently, however, ancient DNA has been used to provide a clearer picture of the genetic effects of these movements of people.

One 2016 study, using Iron Age and Anglo-Saxon era DNA found at grave sites in Cambridgeshire, calculated that ten modern day eastern English samples had 38% Anglo-Saxon ancestry on average, while ten Welsh and Scottish samples each had 30% Anglo-Saxon ancestry, with a large statistical spread in all cases. However, the authors noted that the similarity observed between the various sample groups was likely to be due to more recent internal migration.

Another 2016 study conducted using evidence from burials found in northern England, found that a significant genetic difference was present in bodies from the Iron Age and the Roman period on the one hand, and the Anglo-Saxon period on the other. Samples from modern-day Wales were found to be similar to those from the Iron Age and Roman burials, while samples from much of modern England, East Anglia in particular, were closer to the Anglo-Saxon-era burial. This was found to demonstrate a "profound impact" from the Anglo-Saxon migrations on the modern English gene pool, though no specific percentages were given in the study.

A third study combined the ancient data from both of the preceding studies and compared it to a large number of modern samples from across Britain and Ireland. This study found that modern southern, central and eastern English populations were of "a predominantly Anglo-Saxon-like ancestry" while those from northern and southwestern England had a greater degree of indigenous origin.

A major 2020 study, which used DNA from Viking-era burials in various regions across Europe, found that modern English samples showed nearly equal contributions from a native British "North Atlantic" population and a Danish-like population. While much of the latter signature was attributed to the earlier settlement of the Anglo-Saxons, it was calculated that up to 6% of it could have come from Danish Vikings, with a further 4% contribution from a Norwegian-like source representing the Norwegian Vikings. The study also found an average 18% admixture from a source further south in Europe, which was interpreted as reflecting the legacy of French migration under the Normans.

A landmark 2022 study titled "The Anglo-Saxon migration and the formation of the early English gene pool", found the English to be of plurality Anglo-Saxon-like ancestry, with heavy native Celtic Briton, and newly confirmed medieval French admixture. Significant regional variation was also observed.

History of English people

"History of the English" redirects here. Not to be confused with History of English. Main article: History of England

Anglo-Saxon settlement

Further information: Anglo-Saxons, Roman Britain, Sub-Roman Britain, Ancient Britons, and Romano-Britons
A replica of the Sutton Hoo helmet

The first people to be called "English" were the Anglo-Saxons, a group of closely related Germanic tribes that began migrating to eastern and southern Britain, from southern Denmark and northern Germany, in the 5th century AD, after the Romans had withdrawn from Britain. The Anglo-Saxons gave their name to England ("Engla land", meaning "Land of the Angles") and to the English.

The Anglo-Saxons arrived in a land that was already populated by people commonly referred to as the "Romano-British"—the descendants of the native Brittonic-speaking population that lived in the area of Britain under Roman rule during the 1st–5th centuries AD. The multi-ethnic nature of the Roman Empire meant that small numbers of other peoples may have also been present in England before the Anglo-Saxons arrived. There is archaeological evidence, for example, of an early North African presence in a Roman garrison at Aballava, now Burgh-by-Sands, in Cumbria: a 4th-century inscription says that the Roman military unit "Numerus Maurorum Aurelianorum" ("unit of Aurelian Moors") from Mauretania (Morocco) was stationed there. Although the Roman Empire incorporated peoples from far and wide, genetic studies suggest the Romans did not significantly mix into the British population.

Southern Britain in AD 600 after the Anglo-Saxon settlement, showing England's division into multiple petty kingdoms

The exact nature of the arrival of the Anglo-Saxons and their relationship with the Romano-British is a matter of debate. The traditional view is that a mass invasion by various Anglo-Saxon tribes largely displaced the indigenous British population in southern and eastern Britain (modern-day England with the exception of Cornwall). This is supported by the writings of Gildas, who gives the only contemporary historical account of the period, and describes the slaughter and starvation of native Britons by invading tribes (aduentus Saxonum). Furthermore, the English language contains no more than a handful of words borrowed from Brittonic sources.

This view was later re-evaluated by some archaeologists and historians, with a more small-scale migration being posited, possibly based around an elite of male warriors that took over the rule of the country and gradually acculturated the people living there. Within this theory, two processes leading to Anglo-Saxonisation have been proposed. One is similar to culture changes observed in Russia, North Africa and parts of the Islamic world, where a politically and socially powerful minority culture becomes, over a rather short period, adopted by a settled majority. This process is usually termed "elite dominance". The second process is explained through incentives, such as the Wergild outlined in the law code of Ine of Wessex which produced an incentive to become Anglo-Saxon or at least English speaking. Historian Malcolm Todd writes, "It is much more likely that a large proportion of the British population remained in place and was progressively dominated by a Germanic aristocracy, in some cases marrying into it and leaving Celtic names in the, admittedly very dubious, early lists of Anglo-Saxon dynasties. But how we identify the surviving Britons in areas of predominantly Anglo-Saxon settlement, either archaeologically or linguistically, is still one of the deepest problems of early English history."

An emerging view is that the degree of population replacement by the Anglo-Saxons, and thus the degree of survival of the Romano-Britons, varied across England, and that as such the overall settlement of Britain by the Anglo-Saxons cannot be described by any one process in particular. Large-scale migration and population shift seems to be most applicable in the cases of eastern regions such as East Anglia and Lincolnshire, while in parts of Northumbria, much of the native population likely remained in place as the incomers took over as elites. In a study of place names in northeastern England and southern Scotland, Bethany Fox found that the migrants settled in large numbers in river valleys, such as those of the Tyne and the Tweed, with the Britons moving to the less fertile hill country and becoming acculturated over a longer period. Fox describes the process by which English came to dominate this region as "a synthesis of mass-migration and elite-takeover models."

Vikings and the Danelaw

Further information: Vikings and Danelaw
Æthelred II (c. 966 – 23 April 1016), known as 'the Unready', was King of the English from 978 to 1013 and again from 1014 until his death.

From about 800 AD, waves of Danish Viking assaults on the coastlines of the British Isles were gradually followed by a succession of Danish settlers in England. At first, the Vikings were very much considered a separate people from the English. This separation was enshrined when Alfred the Great signed the Treaty of Alfred and Guthrum to establish the Danelaw, a division of England between English and Danish rule, with the Danes occupying northern and eastern England.

However, Alfred's successors subsequently won military victories against the Danes, incorporating much of the Danelaw into the nascent kingdom of England. Danish invasions continued into the 11th century, and there were both English and Danish kings in the period following the unification of England (for example, Æthelred II (978–1013 and 1014–1016) was English but Cnut (1016–1035) was Danish).

Gradually, the Danes in England came to be seen as 'English'. They had a noticeable impact on the English language: many English words, such as anger, ball, egg, got, knife, take, and they, are of Old Norse origin, and place names that end in -thwaite and -by are Scandinavian in origin.

English unification

Further information: Treaty of Wedmore and Treaty of Alfred and Guthrum

The English population was not politically unified until the 10th century. Before then, there were a number of petty kingdoms which gradually coalesced into a heptarchy of seven states, the most powerful of which were Mercia and Wessex. The English nation state began to form when the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms united against Danish Viking invasions, which began around 800 AD. Over the following century and a half England was for the most part a politically unified entity, and remained permanently so after 954.

The nation of England was formed in 12 July 927 by Æthelstan of Wessex after the Treaty of Eamont Bridge, as Wessex grew from a relatively small kingdom in the South West to become the founder of the Kingdom of the English, incorporating all Anglo-Saxon kingdoms and the Danelaw.

Norman and Angevin rule

Further information: Normans
Battle of Hastings, 1066 (from the Bayeux Tapestry)

The Norman conquest of England during 1066 brought Anglo-Saxon and Danish rule of England to an end, as the new French-speaking Norman elite almost universally replaced the Anglo-Saxon aristocracy and church leaders. After the conquest, "English" normally included all natives of England, whether they were of Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian or Celtic ancestry, to distinguish them from the Norman invaders, who were regarded as "Norman" even if born in England, for a generation or two after the Conquest. The Norman dynasty ruled England for 87 years until the death of King Stephen in 1154, when the succession passed to Henry II, House of Plantagenet (based in France), and England became part of the Angevin Empire until its collapse in 1214.

Anglo-Norman and Latin continued to be the two languages used officially by the Plantagenet kings until Edward I came to the throne, when Middle English became used in official documents, but alongside Anglo-Norman and Latin. Over time the English language became more important even in the court, and the Normans were gradually assimilated, until, by the 14th century, both rulers and subjects regarded themselves as English and spoke the English language.

Despite the assimilation of the Normans, the distinction between 'English' and 'French' people survived in some official documents long after it had fallen out of common use, in particular in the legal process Presentment of Englishry (a rule by which a hundred had to prove an unidentified murdered body found on their soil to be that of an Englishman, rather than a Norman, if they wanted to avoid a fine). This law was abolished in 1340.

United Kingdom

Main article: History of the formation of the United Kingdom St George's Cross
(England) St Andrew's Cross
(Scotland) Great Britain St Patrick's Cross
(Ireland) United Kingdom

Since the 18th century, England has been one part of a wider political entity covering all or part of the British Isles, which today is called the United Kingdom. Wales was annexed by England by the Laws in Wales Acts 1535–1542, which incorporated Wales into the English state. A new British identity was subsequently developed when James VI of Scotland became James I of England as well, and expressed the desire to be known as the monarch of Britain.

In 1707, England formed a union with Scotland by passing an Act of Union in March 1707 that ratified the Treaty of Union. The Parliament of Scotland had previously passed its own Act of Union, so the Kingdom of Great Britain was born on 1 May 1707. In 1801, another Act of Union formed a union between the Kingdom of Great Britain and the Kingdom of Ireland, creating the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. In 1922, about two-thirds of the Irish population (those who lived in 26 of the 32 counties of Ireland), left the United Kingdom to form the Irish Free State. The remainder became the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, although this name was not introduced until 1927, after some years in which the term "United Kingdom" had been little used.

Throughout the history of the UK, the English have been dominant in population and in political weight. As a consequence, notions of 'Englishness' and 'Britishness' are often very similar. At the same time, after the Union of 1707, the English, along with the other peoples of the British Isles, have been encouraged to think of themselves as British rather than to identify themselves with the constituent nations.

Immigration and assimilation

See also: Historical immigration to Great Britain and Immigration to the United Kingdom (1922-present day)

England has been the destination of varied numbers of migrants at different periods from the 17th century onwards. While some members of these groups seek to practise a form of pluralism, attempting to maintain a separate ethnic identity, others have assimilated and intermarried with the English. Since Oliver Cromwell's resettlement of the Jews in 1656, there have been waves of Jewish immigration from Russia in the 19th century and from Germany in the 20th.

After the French king Louis XIV declared Protestantism illegal in 1685 in the Edict of Fontainebleau, an estimated 50,000 Protestant Huguenots fled to England. Due to sustained and sometimes mass emigration of the Irish, current estimates indicate that around 6 million people in the UK have at least one grandparent born in the Republic of Ireland.

There has been a small black presence in England since the 16th century due to the slave trade, and a small Indian presence since at least the 17th century because of the East India Company and British Raj. Black and Asian populations have only grown throughout the UK generally, as immigration from the British Empire and the subsequent Commonwealth of Nations was encouraged due to labour shortages during post World War II rebuilding. However, these groups are often still considered to be ethnic minorities and research has shown that black and Asian people in the UK are more likely to identify as British rather than with one of the state's four constituent nations, including England.

A nationally representative survey published in June 2021 found that a majority of respondents thought that being English was not dependent on race. 77% of white respondents in England agreed that "Being English is open to people of different ethnic backgrounds who identify as English", whereas 14% were of the view that "Only people who are white count as truly English". Amongst ethnic minority respondents, the equivalent figures were 68% and 19%. Research has found that the proportion of people who consider being white to be a necessary component of Englishness has declined over time.

Current national and political identity

The 1990s witnessed a resurgence of English national identity. Survey data shows a rise in the number of people in England describing their national identity as English and a fall in the number describing themselves as British. Today, black and minority ethnic people of England still generally identify as British rather than English to a greater extent than their white counterparts; however, groups such as the Campaign for an English Parliament (CEP) suggest the emergence of a broader civic and multi-ethnic English nationhood. Scholars and journalists have noted a rise in English self-consciousness, with increased use of the English flag, particularly at football matches where the Union flag was previously more commonly flown by fans.

This perceived rise in English self-consciousness has generally been attributed to the devolution in the late 1990s of some powers to the Scottish Parliament and National Assembly for Wales. In policy areas for which the devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have responsibility, the UK Parliament votes on laws that consequently only apply to England. Because the Westminster Parliament is composed of MPs from throughout the United Kingdom, this has given rise to the "West Lothian question", a reference to the situation in which MPs representing constituencies outside England can vote on matters affecting only England, but MPs cannot vote on the same matters in relation to the other parts of the UK. Consequently, groups such as the CEP have called for the creation of a devolved English Parliament, claiming that there is now a discriminatory democratic deficit against the English. The establishment of an English parliament has also been backed by a number of Scottish and Welsh nationalists. Writer Paul Johnson has suggested that like most dominant groups, the English have only demonstrated interest in their ethnic self-definition when they were feeling oppressed.

John Curtice argues that "In the early years of devolution...there was little sign" of an English backlash against devolution for Scotland and Wales, but that more recently survey data shows tentative signs of "a form of English nationalism...beginning to emerge among the general public". Michael Kenny, Richard English and Richard Hayton, meanwhile, argue that the resurgence in English nationalism predates devolution, being observable in the early 1990s, but that this resurgence does not necessarily have negative implications for the perception of the UK as a political union. Others question whether devolution has led to a rise in English national identity at all, arguing that survey data fails to portray the complex nature of national identities, with many people considering themselves both English and British. A 2017 survey by YouGov found that 38% of English voters considered themselves both English and British, alongside 19% who felt English but not British.

Recent surveys of public opinion on the establishment of an English parliament have given widely varying conclusions. In the first five years of devolution for Scotland and Wales, support in England for the establishment of an English parliament was low at between 16 and 19%, according to successive British Social Attitudes Surveys. A report, also based on the British Social Attitudes Survey, published in December 2010 suggests that only 29% of people in England support the establishment of an English parliament, though this figure had risen from 17% in 2007.

One 2007 poll carried out for BBC Newsnight, however, found that 61 per cent would support such a parliament being established. Krishan Kumar notes that support for measures to ensure that only English MPs can vote on legislation that applies only to England is generally higher than that for the establishment of an English parliament, although support for both varies depending on the timing of the opinion poll and the wording of the question. Electoral support for English nationalist parties is also low, even though there is public support for many of the policies they espouse. The English Democrats gained just 64,826 votes in the 2010 UK general election, accounting for 0.3 per cent of all votes cast in England. Kumar argued in 2010 that "despite devolution and occasional bursts of English nationalism – more an expression of exasperation with the Scots or Northern Irish – the English remain on the whole satisfied with current constitutional arrangements".

English diaspora

Main article: English diaspora
Numbers of the English diaspora
Year Country Population % of pop.
2021 Australia 8,385,928 33.0
2020 United States 46,550,968 19.8
2016 Canada 6,320,085 18.3
2011 Scotland 459,486 8.7
2018 New Zealand 72,204–210,915 4.5

From the earliest times, English people have left England to settle in other parts of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. It is impossible to identify their numbers, as British censuses have historically not invited respondents to identify themselves as English. However, the census does record place of birth, revealing that 8.1% of Scotland's population, 3.7% of the population of Northern Ireland and 20% of the Welsh population were born in England. Similarly, the census of the Republic of Ireland does not collect information on ethnicity, but it does record that there are over 200,000 people living in Ireland who were born in England and Wales.

English ethnic descent and emigrant communities are found primarily in the Western world, and settled in significant numbers in some areas. Substantial populations descended from English colonists and immigrants exist in the United States, Canada, Australia, South Africa and New Zealand.

United States

Main article: English Americans
George Washington, known as the "Father of His Country", and first President of the United States, had English ancestors.

In the 2020 United States census, English Americans were the largest group in the United States with 46.5 million Americans self-identifying as having some English origins (many combined with another heritage) representing (19.8%) of the White American population. This includes 25.5 million (12.5%) who were "English alone" - one origin. However, demographers regard this as an undercount, as the index of inconsistency is high, and many, if not most, people from English stock have a tendency (since the introduction of a new 'American' category and ignoring the ancestry question in the 2000 census) to identify as simply Americans or if of mixed European ancestry, identify with a more recent and differentiated ethnic group.

Prior to this, in the 2000 census, 24,509,692 Americans described their ancestry as wholly or partly English. In addition, 1,035,133 recorded British ancestry. This was a numerical decrease from the census in 1990 where 32,651,788 people or 13.1% of the population self-identified with English ancestry.

In 1980, over 49 million (49,598,035) Americans claimed English ancestry, at the time around 26.3% of the total population and largest reported group which, even today, would make them the largest ethnic group in the United States. Scots-Irish Americans are descendants of Lowland Scots and Northern English (specifically: County Durham, Cumberland, Northumberland and Westmorland) settlers who colonised Ireland during the Plantation of Ulster in the 17th century.

Americans of English heritage are often seen, and identify, as simply "American" due to the many historic cultural ties between England and the U.S. and their influence on the country's population. Relative to ethnic groups of other European origins, this may be due to the early establishment of English settlements; as well as to non-English groups having emigrated in order to establish significant communities.

Canada

Main article: English Canadians

In the Canada 2016 Census, 'English' was the most common ethnic origin (ethnic origin refers to the ethnic or cultural group(s) to which the respondent's ancestors belong) recorded by respondents; 6,320,085 people or 18.3% of the population self-identified themselves as wholly or partly English. On the other hand, people identifying as Canadian but not English may have previously identified as English before the option of identifying as Canadian was available.

Australia

Main article: English Australians
Edmund Barton and Alfred Deakin, 1st and 2nd Prime Minister of Australia both had English parents.

From the beginning of the colonial era until the mid-20th century, the vast majority of settlers to Australia were from the British Isles, with the English being the dominant group. Among the leading ancestries, increases in Australian, Irish and German ancestries and decreases in English, Scottish and Welsh ancestries appear to reflect such shifts in perception or reporting. These reporting shifts at least partly resulted from changes in the design of the census question, in particular the introduction of a tick box format in 2001. English Australians have more often come from the south than the north of England.

Australians of English descent, are both the single largest ethnic group in Australia and the largest 'ancestry' identity in the Australian census. In the 2016 census, 7.8 million or 36.1% of the population identified as "English" or a combination including English, a numerical increase from 7.2 million over the 2011 census figure. The census also documented 907,572 residents or 3.9% of Australia as being born in England, and are the largest overseas-born population.

New Zealand

See also: English New Zealanders and Pākehā settlers

English ancestry is the largest single ancestry New Zealanders share. Several million New Zealanders are estimated to have some English ancestry From 1840, the English comprised the largest single group among New Zealand's overseas-born, consistently being over 50 percent of the total population. Despite this, after the early 1850s, the English-born slowly fell from being a majority of the colonial population. In the 1851 census, 50.5% of the total population were born in England, this proportion fell to 36.5% (1861) and 24.3% by 1881. New Zealand's foundational culture was English, given the strong representation in the mid and late-nineteenth century with the English being the largest in migration inflows.

In the 2013 census, there were 215,589 English-born representing 21.5% of all overseas-born residents or 5 percent of the total population and the most-common birthplace outside New Zealand. In the recent 2018 census, 210,915 were born in England or 4.49% of the total population, a slight decrease from 2013.

Argentina

Main article: English Argentines
William Henry Hudson was an Argentine author, naturalist, and ornithologist of English origin.

English settlers arrived in Buenos Aires in 1806 (then a Spanish colony) in small numbers, mostly as businessmen, when Argentina was an emerging nation and the settlers were welcomed for the stability they brought to commercial life. As the 19th century progressed, more English families arrived, and many bought land to develop the potential of the Argentine pampas for the large-scale growing of crops. The English founded banks, developed the export trade in crops and animal products and imported the luxuries that the growing Argentine middle classes sought.

As well as those who went to Argentina as industrialists and major landowners, others went as railway engineers, civil engineers and to work in banking and commerce. Others went to become whalers, missionaries and simply to seek out a future. English families sent second and younger sons, or what were described as the black sheep of the family, to Argentina to make their fortunes in cattle and wheat. English settlers introduced football to Argentina. Some English families owned sugar plantations.

Chile

Main article: English Chileans

Since the Port of Valparaíso opened its coasts to free trade in 1811, the English began to congregate in Valparaíso. The English eventually numbered more than 32,000 during the port of Valparaíso's boom period during the saltpeter bonanza at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries.

Culture

Main article: Culture of England

The culture of England is sometimes difficult to separate clearly from the culture of the United Kingdom, so influential has English culture been on the cultures of the British Isles and, on the other hand, given the extent to which other cultures have influenced life in England.

Religion

Main article: Religion in England
Wells Cathedral, Somerset

The established religion of the realm is the Church of England, whose titular head is Charles III although the worldwide Anglican Communion is overseen by the General Synod of its bishops under the authority of Parliament. 26 of the church's 42 bishops are Lords Spiritual, representing the church in the House of Lords. In 2010, the Church of England counted 25 million baptised members out of the 41 million Christians in Great Britain's population of about 60 million; around the same time, it also claimed to baptise one in eight newborn children. Generally, anyone in England may marry or be buried at their local parish church, whether or not they have been baptised in the church. Actual attendance has declined steadily since 1890, with around one million, or 10% of the baptised population attending Sunday services on a regular basis (defined as once a month or more) and three million -roughly 15%- joining Christmas Eve and Christmas services.

A crowd celebrates Saint George's Day at an event in Trafalgar Square in 2010.

Saint George is recognised as the patron saint of England, and the flag of England consists of his cross. Before Edward III, the patron saint was St Edmund; and St Alban is also honoured as England's first martyr. A survey carried out in the end of 2008 by Ipsos MORI on behalf of The Catholic Agency For Overseas Development found the population of England and Wales to be 47.0% affiliated with the Church of England, which is also the state church, 9.6% with the Roman Catholic Church and 8.7% were other Christians, mainly Free church Protestants and Eastern Orthodox Christians. 4.8% were Muslim, 3.4% were members of other religions, 5.3% were agnostics, 6.8% were atheists and 15.0% were not sure about their religious affiliation or refused to answer to the question.

Religious observance of St George's Day (23 April) changes when it is too close to Easter. According to the Church of England's calendar, when St George's Day falls between Palm Sunday and the Second Sunday of Easter inclusive, it is moved to the Monday after the Second Sunday of Easter.

Language

See also: Old English and English language in England
Map showing phonological variation within England of the vowel in bath, grass, and dance:   'a'   'aa'   'ah'   anomalies

English people traditionally speak the English language, a member of the West Germanic language family. The modern English language evolved from Middle English (the form of language in use by the English people from the 12th to the 15th century); Middle English was influenced lexically by Norman-French, Old French and Latin. In the Middle English period Latin was the language of administration and the nobility spoke Norman French. Middle English was itself derived from the Old English of the Anglo-Saxon period; in the Northern and Eastern parts of England the language of Danish settlers had influenced the language, a fact still evident in Northern English dialects.

There were once many different dialects of modern English in England, which were recorded in projects such as the English Dialect Dictionary (late 19th century) and the Survey of English Dialects (mid 20th century), but there has been widespread dialect levelling in recent time as a result of education, the media and socio-economic pressures.

Cornish, a Celtic language, is one of three existing Brittonic languages; its usage has been revived in Cornwall. Historically, another Brittonic Celtic language, Cumbric, was spoken in Cumbria in North West England, but it died out in the 11th century although traces of it can still be found in the Cumbrian dialect. Early Modern English began in the late 15th century with the introduction of the printing press to London and the Great Vowel Shift. Through the worldwide influence of the British Empire, English spread around the world from the 17th to mid-20th centuries. Through newspapers, books, the telegraph, the telephone, phonograph records, radio, satellite television, broadcasters (such as the BBC) and the Internet, as well as the emergence of the United States as a global superpower, Modern English has become the international language of business, science, communication, sports, aviation, and diplomacy.

Literature

Main article: English literature
This section possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (February 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (February 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Geoffrey Chaucer (/ˈtʃɔːsər/; c. 1340s – 25 October 1400) was an English poet and author. Widely seen as the greatest English poet of the Middle Ages, he is best known for The Canterbury Tales.

English literature begins with Anglo-Saxon literature, which was written in Old English and produced epic works such as Beowulf and the fragmentary The Battle of Maldon, The Seafarer and The Wanderer. For many years, Latin and French were the preferred literary languages of England, but in the medieval period there was a flourishing of literature in Middle English; Geoffrey Chaucer is the most famous writer of this period.

The Elizabethan era is sometimes described as the golden age of English literature with writers such as William Shakespeare, Thomas Nashe, Edmund Spenser, Sir Philip Sidney, Christopher Marlowe and Ben Jonson.

Other famous English writers include Jane Austen, Arnold Bennett, Rupert Brooke, Agatha Christie, Charles Dickens, Thomas Hardy, A. E. Housman, George Orwell and the Lake Poets.

In 2003, the BBC carried out a UK survey entitled The Big Read in order to find the "nation's best-loved novel" of all time, with works by English novelists J. R. R. Tolkien, Jane Austen, Philip Pullman, Douglas Adams and J. K. Rowling making up the top five on the list.

See also

Language:

Diaspora:

Notes

  1. Spellings of this name most common in modern texts are "Ethelred" and "Æthelred" (or "Aethelred"), the latter being closer to the original Old English form Æþelræd.
  2. Those who self-identified as English ethnic group
  3. 210915 listed their birthplace as England.

References

Citations

  1. "Ethnicity and National Identity in England and Wales". www.ons.gov.uk. Office for National Statistics. 11 December 2012. Archived from the original on 21 January 2022. Retrieved 21 February 2022. The 2011 England and Wales census reports that in England and Wales 32.4 million people associated themselves with an English identity alone and 37.6 million identified themselves with an English identity either on its own or combined with other identities, being 57.7% and 67.1% respectively of the population of England and Wales.
  2. "English Most Common Race or Ethnicity in 2020 Census". United States census. 10 October 2023. Retrieved 21 October 2023.
  3. "2021 Australia, Census All persons QuickStats | Australian Bureau of Statistics". www.abs.gov.au.
  4. "Census Profile, 2016 Census". Statistics Canada. 8 February 2017. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 14 December 2019.
  5. ^ "2018 Census population and dwelling counts". Stats NZ. 23 September 2019. Retrieved 5 January 2021.
  6. Census 2011: Census in brief (PDF). Pretoria: Statistics South Africa. 2012. p. 26. ISBN 978-0-621-41388-5. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 May 2015. The number of people who described themselves as white in terms of population group and specified their first language as English in South Africa's 2011 Census was 1,603,575. The total white population with a first language specified was 4,461,409 and the total population was 51,770,560.
  7. Cole, Jeffrey (2011). Ethnic Groups of Europe: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-59884-302-6. Archived from the original on 15 August 2021. Retrieved 6 July 2021 – via Google Books.
  8. "English". Online Etymology Dictionary. Etymonline.com. Archived from the original on 20 April 2012. Retrieved 8 July 2011.
  9. ^ Leslie, Stephen; Winney, Bruce; Hellenthal, Garrett; Davison, Dan; Boumertit, Abdelhamid; Day, Tammy; Hutnik, Katarzyna; Royrvik, Ellen C.; Cunliffe, Barry; Lawson, Daniel J.; Falush, Daniel; Freeman, Colin; Pirinen, Matti; Myers, Simon; Robinson, Mark; Donnelly, Peter; Bodmer, Walter (19 March 2015). "The fine scale genetic structure of the British population". Nature. 519 (7543): 309–314. Bibcode:2015Natur.519..309.. doi:10.1038/nature14230. PMC 4632200. PMID 25788095.
  10. Schiffels, Stephan; Haak, Wolfgang; Paajanen, Pirita; Llamas, Bastien; Popescu, Elizabeth; Loe, Louise; Clarke, Rachel; Lyons, Alice; Mortimer, Richard; Sayer, Duncan; Tyler-Smith, Chris; Cooper, Alan; Durbin, Richard (19 January 2016). "Iron Age and Anglo-Saxon genomes from East England reveal British migration history". Nature Communications. 7: 10408. Bibcode:2016NatCo...710408S. doi:10.1038/ncomms10408. PMC 4735688. PMID 26783965.
  11. ^ Martiniano, R., Caffell, A., Holst, M. et al. "Genomic signals of migration and continuity in Britain before the Anglo-Saxons". Nat Commun 7, 10326 (2016). doi:10.1038/ncomms10326 Martiniano, Rui; Caffell, Anwen; Holst, Malin; Hunter-Mann, Kurt; Montgomery, Janet; Müldner, Gundula; McLaughlin, Russell L.; Teasdale, Matthew D.; Van Rheenen, Wouter; Veldink, Jan H.; Van Den Berg, L. H.; Hardiman, Orla; Carroll, Maureen; Roskams, Steve; Oxley, John; Morgan, Colleen; Thomas, Mark G.; Barnes, Ian; McDonnell, Christine; Collins, Matthew J.; Bradley, Daniel G. (19 January 2016). "Genomic signals of migration and continuity in Britain before the Anglo-Saxons". Nature Communications. 7 (1): 10326. Bibcode:2016NatCo...710326M. doi:10.1038/ncomms10326. PMC 4735653. PMID 26783717.
  12. Michael E. Weale, Deborah A. Weiss, Rolf F. Jager, Neil Bradman, Mark G. Thomas, Y "Chromosome Evidence for Anglo-Saxon Mass Migration", Molecular Biology and Evolution, Volume 19, Issue 7, July 2002, pp. 1008–1021, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004160 Archived 21 February 2022 at the Wayback Machine
  13. Brix, Lise (20 February 2017). "New study reignites debate over Viking settlements in England". sciencenordic.com (in Norwegian Bokmål). Retrieved 8 May 2022.
  14. Kershaw, Jane; Røyrvik, Ellen C. (December 2016). "The 'People of the British Isles' project and Viking settlement in England". Antiquity. 90 (354): 1670–1680. doi:10.15184/aqy.2016.193. ISSN 0003-598X. S2CID 52266574.
  15. "Huguenots | The History of London". www.thehistoryoflondon.co.uk. 31 August 2019. Retrieved 31 December 2023.
  16. Campbell. The Anglo-Saxon State. p. 10
  17. Ward-Perkins, Bryan (2000). "Why did the Anglo-Saxons not become more British?". The English Historical Review. 115 (462): 513–533. doi:10.1093/ehr/115.462.513.
  18. Hills, C. (2003) Origins of the English Duckworth, London. ISBN 0-7156-3191-8, p. 67
  19. Higham, Nicholas J., and Martin J. Ryan. The Anglo-Saxon World. Yale University Press, 2013. pp. 7–19
  20. "Chambers – Search Chambers". Archived from the original on 11 May 2020. Retrieved 7 February 2022. the citizens or inhabitants of, or people born in, England, considered as a group
  21. "Act of Union 1707". parliament.uk. Archived from the original on 21 September 2010. Retrieved 26 August 2010.
  22. Englishman at dictionary.cambridge.org. Retrieved 13 November 2023.
  23. Englishwoman at dictionary.cambridge.org. Retrieved 13 November 2023.
  24. Kumar 2003, pp. 262–290.
  25. Kumar 2003, pp. 1–18.
  26. "English nationalism 'threat to UK'". BBC. 9 January 2000. Archived from the original on 14 August 2021.
  27. "The English question Handle with care". The Economist. 1 November 2007. Archived from the original on 28 September 2008.
  28. Condor, Gibson & Abell 2006.
  29. Frith, Maxine (8 January 2004). "Ethnic minorities feel strong sense of identity with Britain, report reveals". The Independent. Archived from the original on 6 September 2011.
  30. Hussain, Asifa; Millar, William Lockley (2006). Multicultural Nationalism. Oxford University Press. pp. 149–150. ISBN 978-0-19-928071-1. Archived from the original on 18 May 2016 – via Google Books.
  31. Campbell, Dennis (18 June 2006). "Asian recruits boost England fan army". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 21 December 2016.
  32. "National Identity and Community in England" (2006) Institute of Governance Briefing No. 7. Archived 15 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  33. "78 per cent of Bangladeshis said they were British, while only 5 per cent said they were English, Scottish or Welsh", and the largest percentage of non-whites to identify as English were the people who described their ethnicity as "Mixed" (37%).'Identity', National Statistics, 21 February 2006
  34. "National identity, England and Wales: Census 2021". Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 5 January 2025.
  35. Kumar 2003, pp. 1–2.
  36. Taylor, A. J. P. (1965, English History, 1914–1945 Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. v
  37. Davies, Norman (1999). The Isles: A History. Macmillan Publishing. ISBN 978-0333692837.
  38. Parris, Matthew (18 December 2010). "With a shrug of the shoulders, England is becoming a nation once again". The Spectator.
  39. ^ Haak, Wolfgang; Lazaridis, Iosif; Patterson, Nick; Rohland, Nadin; Mallick, Swapan; Llamas, Bastien; Brandt, Guido; Nordenfelt, Susanne; Harney, Eadaoin; Stewardson, Kristin; Fu, Qiaomei (11 June 2015). "Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe". Nature. 522 (7555): 207–211. arXiv:1502.02783. Bibcode:2015Natur.522..207H. doi:10.1038/nature14317. ISSN 0028-0836. PMC 5048219. PMID 25731166.
  40. Curry, Andrew (August 2019). "The first Europeans weren't who you might think". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 19 March 2021.
  41. Gibbons, Ann (21 February 2017). "Thousands of horsemen may have swept into Bronze Age Europe, transforming the local population". Science.
  42. ^ Novembre, John; Johnson, Toby; Bryc, Katarzyna; Kutalik, Zoltán; Boyko, Adam R.; Auton, Adam; Indap, Amit; King, Karen S.; Bergmann, Sven; Nelson, Matthew R.; Stephens, Matthew; Bustamante, Carlos D. (2008). "Genes mirror geography within Europe". Nature. 456 (7218): 98–101. Bibcode:2008Natur.456...98N. doi:10.1038/nature07331. PMC 2735096. PMID 18758442.
  43. "Dutch Beakers: Like no other Beakers". 19 January 2019. Archived from the original on 12 May 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  44. Rincon, Paul (21 February 2018). "Ancient Britons 'replaced' by newcomers". BBC News. Archived from the original on 4 March 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2019.
  45. Athanasiadis, G.; Cheng, J. Y.; Vilhjalmsson, B. J.; Jorgensen, F. G.; Als, T. D.; Le Hellard, S.; Espeseth, T.; Sullivan, P. F.; Hultman, C. M.; Kjaergaard, P. C.; Schierup, M. H.; Mailund, T. (2016). "Nationwide Genomic Study in Denmark Reveals Remarkable Population Homogeneity". Genetics. 204 (2): 711–722. doi:10.1534/genetics.116.189241. PMC 5068857. PMID 27535931.
  46. Weale, Michael E.; Weiss, Deborah A.; Jager, Rolf F.; Bradman, Neil; Thomas, Mark G. (1 July 2002). "Y Chromosome Evidence for Anglo-Saxon Mass Migration". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 19 (7): 1008–1021. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004160. PMID 12082121. Archived from the original on 2 June 2020. Retrieved 7 June 2020 – via academic.oup.com.
  47. "A Y Chromosome Census of the British Isles" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 June 2020. Retrieved 7 June 2020.
  48. Oppenheimer, Stephen (2006). The Origins of the British: A Genetic Detective Story. London: Constable and Robinson. ISBN 978-1-84529-158-7.
  49. Schiffels, S. et al. (2016) Iron Age and Anglo-Saxon genomes from East England reveal British migration history Archived 17 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine, Nature Communications 7, Article number:10408 doi:10.1038/ncomms10408
  50. Ross P. Byrne, Rui Martiniano, Lara M. Cassidy, Matthew Carrigan, Garrett Hellenthal, Orla Hardiman, Daniel G. Bradley, Russell McLaughlin: "Insular Celtic population structure and genomic footprints of migration" (2018)
  51. Margaryan, A., Lawson, D.J., Sikora, M. et al. "Population genomics of the Viking world". Nature 585, 390–396 (2020) See Supplementary Note 11 in particular
  52. Gretzinger; Sayer; Justeau; et al. (21 September 2022). "The Anglo-Saxon migration and the formation of the early English gene pool". Nature. 610 (7930): 112–119. Bibcode:2022Natur.610..112G. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05247-2. PMC 9534755. PMID 36131019.
  53. The archaeology of black Britain Archived 24 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Channel 4. Retrieved 21 December 2009.
  54. Eva Botkin-Kowacki, 'Where did the British come from? Ancient DNA holds clues. Archived 15 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine' (20/01/16), The Christian Science Monitor
  55. Wise, Gildas the (1899). "The Ruin of Britain". Tertullian.org. pp. 4–252. Archived from the original on 22 September 2017. Retrieved 21 August 2017.
  56. celtpn Archived 6 December 2007 at the Wayback Machine However the names of some towns, cities, rivers etc. do have Brittonic or pre-Brittonic origins, becoming more frequent towards the west of Britain.
  57. "Britain BC: Life in Britain and Ireland before the Romans" by Francis Pryor, p. 122. Harper Perennial. ISBN 0-00-712693-X.
  58. Ward-Perkins, Bryan. "Why did the Anglo-Saxons not become more British?" The English Historical Review 115.462 (2000): p. 523
  59. Higham, Nicholas J. and Ryan, Martin J. "The Anglo-Saxon World" (Yale University Press, 2013)
  60. Ward-Perkins, Bryan. "Why did the Anglo-Saxons not become more British?" The English Historical Review 115.462 (2000): 513–533.
  61. Ingham, Richard (19 July 2006). "Anglo-Saxons wanted genetic supremacy". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Archived from the original on 15 December 2020. Retrieved 7 June 2020.
  62. Todd, Malcolm. "Anglo-Saxon Origins: The Reality of the Myth" Archived 24 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine, in Cameron, Keith. "The nation: myth or reality?"bIntellect Books, 1994. Retrieved 21 December 2009.
  63. Stefan Burmeister, Archaeology and Migration (2000): " ... immigration in the nucleus of the Anglo-Saxon settlement does not seem aptly described in terms of the 'elite-dominance model.' To all appearances, the settlement was carried out by small, agriculture-oriented kinship groups. This process corresponds more closely to a classic settler model. The absence of early evidence of a socially demarcated elite underscores the supposition that such an elite did not play a substantial role. Rich burials such as are well known from Denmark have no counterparts in England until the 6th century. At best, the elite-dominance model might apply in the peripheral areas of the settlement territory, where an immigration predominantly comprised of men and the existence of hybrid cultural forms might support it."
  64. Dark, Ken R. (2003). "Large-scale population movements into and from Britain south of Hadrian's Wall in the fourth to sixth centuries AD" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 June 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  65. Toby F. Martin, The Cruciform Brooch and Anglo-Saxon England, Boydell and Brewer Press (2015), pp. 174–178
  66. Catherine Hills, "The Anglo-Saxon Migration: An Archaeological Case Study of Disruption," in Migrations and Disruptions, ed. Brenda J. Baker and Takeyuki Tsuda, pp. 45–48
  67. Coates, Richard. "Celtic whispers: revisiting the problems of the relation between Brittonic and Old English". Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 7 June 2020.
  68. Härke, Heinrich. "Anglo-Saxon Immigration and Ethnogenesis." Medieval Archaeology 55.1 (2011): 1–28.
  69. Kortlandt, Frederik (2018). "Relative Chronology" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 7 June 2020.
  70. Fox, Bethany. "The P-Celtic Place Names of North-East England and South-East Scotland". Archived from the original on 28 November 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  71. The Age of Athelstan by Paul Hill (2004), Tempus Publishing. ISBN 0-7524-2566-8
  72. Online Etymology Dictionary Archived 4 July 2017 at the Wayback Machine by Douglas Harper (2001), List of sources used Archived 8 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 10 July 2006.
  73. The Adventure of English, Melvyn Bragg, 2003. p. 22.
  74. esmeraldamac (16 February 2012). "The Treaty of Eamont Bridge in 927CE". Esmeralda's Cumbrian History & Folklore. Retrieved 27 February 2024.
  75. "Athelstan (c. 895–939): Historic Figures". BBC. Archived from the original on 13 February 2007. Retrieved 30 October 2006.
  76. The Battle of Brunanburh, 937AD Archived 11 November 2010 at the Wayback Machine by h2g2, BBC website. Retrieved 30 October 2006.
  77. A. L. Rowse, The Story of Britain, Artus 1979 ISBN 0-297-83311-1
  78. OED, 2nd edition, s.v. 'English'.
  79. "England—Plantagenet Kings". Heritage History. Archived from the original on 16 December 2010.
  80. Upward, Christopher; Davidson, George (8 December 2024). The History of English Spelling. England (published 2011). pp. 70–74.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  81. "British History in depth: The Ages of English". BBC – History. Archived from the original on 26 August 2017. Retrieved 21 August 2017.
  82. OED, s.v. 'Englishry'.
  83. "Liberation of Ireland". Iol.ie. Archived from the original on 15 June 2006. Retrieved 23 June 2006.
  84. A History of Britain: The British Wars 1603–1776 by Simon Schama, BBC Worldwide. ISBN 0-563-53747-7.
  85. The English, Jeremy Paxman 1998
  86. "EJP – In Depth – On Anglo Jewry". 14 July 2006. Archived from the original on 14 July 2006. Retrieved 21 August 2017.
  87. "Meredith on the Guillet – Thoreau Genealogy". Archived from the original on 27 September 2007.
  88. More Britons applying for Irish passports Archived 5 January 2019 at the Wayback Machine, Owen Bowcott, The Guardian, 13 September 2006. Retrieved 9 January 2006.
  89. ^ Black Presence Archived 24 December 2021 at the Wayback Machine, Asian and Black History in Britain, 1500–1850: UK government website. Retrieved 21 July 2006.
  90. Fisher, Michael Herbert (2006), Counterflows to Colonialism: Indian Traveller and Settler in Britain 1600–1857, Orient Blackswan, pp. 111–119, 129–130, 140, 154–156, 160–168, 172, 181, ISBN 978-81-7824-154-8
  91. Postwar immigration Archived 22 December 2021 at the Wayback Machine The National Archives Accessed October 2006
  92. "Ethnic minorities more likely to feel British than white people, says research". Evening Standard. 18 February 2007. Archived from the original on 11 February 2010. Retrieved 18 September 2010.
  93. "English identity open to all, regardless of race, finds poll – and Three Lions is the symbol that unites us". British Future. 9 June 2021. Archived from the original on 29 October 2021. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
  94. Alexander, Inigo (30 June 2019). "Now 90% of England agrees: being English is not about colour". The Observer. Archived from the original on 29 October 2021. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
  95. ^ "British identity: Waning". The Economist. 25 January 2007. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 9 February 2011.
  96. "When British isn't always best". The Guardian. London. 24 January 2007. Archived from the original on 23 December 2013. Retrieved 9 February 2011.
  97. Jones, Richard Wyn; Lodge, Guy; Jeffery, Charlie; Gottfried, Glenn; Scully, Roger; Henderson, Ailsa; Wincott, Daniel (July 2013). England and its Two Unions: The Anatomy of a Nation and its Discontents (PDF). Institute for Public Policy Research. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 November 2014. Retrieved 7 November 2014.
  98. Kenny, M (2014). The politics of English Nationhood. Oxford University Press. pp. 192–193. ISBN 978-0198778721.
  99. Kumar 2003, p. 262.
  100. Hoyle, Ben (8 June 2006). "St George unfurls his flag (made in China) once again". The Times. London. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 10 February 2011.
  101. "The West Lothian Question". BBC News. 1 June 1998. Archived from the original on 26 January 2011. Retrieved 9 February 2011.
  102. "Fresh call for English Parliament". BBC News. 24 October 2006. Archived from the original on 18 August 2012. Retrieved 9 February 2011.
  103. "Welsh nod for English Parliament". BBC News. 20 December 2006. Archived from the original on 10 August 2012. Retrieved 9 February 2011.
  104. Paul Johnson is quoted by Kumar (Kumar 2003, p. 266)
  105. Curtice, John (February 2010). "Is an English backlash emerging? Reactions to devolution ten years on" (PDF). Institute for Public Policy Research. p. 3. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 April 2018. Retrieved 16 April 2018.
  106. Kenny, Michael; English, Richard; Hayton, Richard (February 2008). "Beyond the constitution? Englishness in a post-devolved Britain". Institute for Public Policy Research. p. 3. Archived from the original on 17 April 2018. Retrieved 16 April 2018.
  107. Condor, Gibson & Abell 2006, p. 128.
  108. "What makes a person English, according to the English | YouGov". yougov.co.uk.
  109. Hazell, Robert (2006). "The English Question". Publius. 36 (1): 37–56. doi:10.1093/publius/pjj012.
  110. Ormston, Rachel; Curtice, John (December 2010). "Resentment or contentment? Attitudes towards the Union ten years on" (PDF). National Centre for Social Research. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 June 2011. Retrieved 9 February 2011.
  111. "'Most' support English parliament". BBC. 16 January 2007. Archived from the original on 28 July 2011. Retrieved 9 February 2011.
  112. Kumar 2010, p. 484.
  113. Copus, Colin (2009). "English national parties in post-devolution UK". British Politics. 4 (3): 363–385. doi:10.1057/bp.2009.12. S2CID 153712090.
  114. "Full England scoreboard". Election 2010. BBC News. Archived from the original on 9 February 2011. Retrieved 9 February 2011.
  115. Kumar 2010, p. 478.
  116. "2021 Australia, Census All persons QuickStats". Australian Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved 27 July 2022.
  117. "Detailed Races and Ethnicities in the United States and Puerto Rico: 2020 Census". United States census. 21 September 2023. Retrieved 21 October 2023.
  118. ^ Census Profile, 2016 Census Archived 19 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine – Ethnic origin population
  119. ^ Focus on Geography Series Archived 21 May 2018 at the Wayback Machine – 2016 Census
  120. 2011 Census for Scotland Standard Outputs Archived 12 May 2021 at the Wayback Machine, Accessed 5 September 2014
  121. "2018 Census totals by topic" (Microsoft Excel spreadsheet). Statistics New Zealand. Archived from the original on 13 April 2020. Retrieved 18 December 2019.
  122. Scotland's Census 2001: Supporting Information (PDF; see p. 43) Archived 26 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  123. Scottish Census Results Online Browser. Retrieved 16 November 2007. Archived 11 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  124. Key Statistics Report, p. 10. Archived 27 November 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  125. Country of Birth: Proportion Born in Wales Falling Archived 24 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine, National Statistics, 8 January 2004.
  126. "Table 19 Enumerated population classified by usual residence and sex" (PDF). Webcitation.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 September 2009. Retrieved 21 August 2017.
  127. An examination of the English ancestry of George Washington, setting forth the evidence to connect him with the Washingtons of Sulgrave and Brington. Boston, Printed for the New England historic genealogical society. 1889. Archived from the original on 3 February 2021. Retrieved 18 December 2019 – via Google Books.
  128. "Detailed Races and Ethnicities in the United States and Puerto Rico: 2020 Census". United States census. 21 September 2023. Retrieved 23 December 2023.
  129. Sharing the Dream: White Males in a Multicultural America Archived 16 October 2015 at the Wayback Machine By Dominic J. Pulera.
  130. Reynolds Farley, 'The New Census Question about Ancestry: What Did It Tell Us?', Demography, Vol. 28, No. 3 (August 1991), pp. 414, 421.
  131. Stanley Lieberson and Lawrence Santi, 'The Use of Nativity Data to Estimate Ethnic Characteristics and Patterns', Social Science Research, Vol. 14, No. 1 (1985), pp. 44–46.
  132. Stanley Lieberson and Mary C. Waters, 'Ethnic Groups in Flux: The Changing Ethnic Responses of American Whites', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 487, No. 79 (September 1986), pp. 82–86.
  133. Mary C. Waters, Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990), p. 36.
  134. US Census 2000 data Archived 18 January 2017 at the Wayback Machine, table PHC-T-43.
  135. "1990 Census of Population Detailed Ancestry Groups for States" (PDF). United States Census Bureau. 18 September 1992. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 July 2017. Retrieved 30 November 2012.
  136. "Table 2: Persons Who Reported at Least One Specific Ancestry Group for the United States: 1980" (PDF). 1980 United States Census. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 20 December 2017.
  137. From many strands: ethnic and racial groups in contemporary América Archived 10 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine by Stanley Lieberson
  138. "Ethnic Origin". 2001 Census. Statistics Canada. 4 November 2002. Archived from the original on 13 December 2017. Retrieved 8 January 2009.
  139. Chui, Tina (April 2008). Canada's Ethnocultural Mosaic, 2006 Census (PDF). Statistics Canada. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-662-48324-3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 March 2009. the presence of the Canadian example has led to an increase in Canadian being reported and has had an impact on the counts of other groups, especially for French, English, Irish and Scottish. People who previously reported these origins in the census had the tendency to now report Canadian.
  140. "Population characteristics: Ancestry of Australia's population". 4102.0 - Australian Social Trends, 2003. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 3 June 2003. Archived from the original on 3 September 2017. Retrieved 21 August 2017.
  141. J. Jupp, The English in Australia, Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 103
  142. "Census 2016: Summary of result – Population by states and territories, 2011 and 2016 Census". Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian Government. Archived from the original on 20 June 2018. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  143. Census of Population and Housing: Reflecting Australia Archived 7 October 2021 at the Wayback Machine – Ancestry 2016
  144. "English – Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand". 20 September 2008. Archived from the original on 20 September 2008.
  145. ^ Bueltmann, Tanja; Gleeson, David T.; MacRaild, Donald M. (2010). Locating the English Diaspora 1500–2010. Liverpool University Press. ISBN 978-1846318191. Archived from the original on 14 August 2021. Retrieved 27 March 2020 – via Google Books.
  146. Bueltmann, Tanja; Gleeson, David T.; MacRaild, Donald M. (2012). Locating the English Diaspora 1500-2010. Liverpool University Press. ISBN 9781846318191.
  147. "Birthplace (detailed) For the census usually resident population count 2001, 2006, and 2013 Censuses Table 11" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 February 2020. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  148. "Emigration of Scots, English and Welsh-speaking people to Argentina in the nineteenth century". British Settlers in Argentina – studies in 19th and 20th century emigration. Archived from the original on 30 January 2008. Retrieved 8 January 2008.
  149. Carr, Raymond (2003). "The invention of Great Britain: A review of The Making of English Identity by Krishnan Kumar". The Spectator. UK. Archived from the original on 11 November 2011.
  150. Gledhill, Ruth (15 February 2007). "Catholics set to pass Anglicans as leading UK church". The Times. London. Archived from the original on 18 September 2011. Retrieved 18 February 2015.
  151. "How many Catholics are there in Britain?". BBC. London. 15 September 2010. Archived from the original on 27 March 2019. Retrieved 18 February 2015.
  152. "2009 Church Statistics" (PDF). Church of England. 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 April 2016. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  153. See the pages linked from "Life Events". Church of England. Archived from the original on 22 November 2010. Retrieved 31 October 2018..
  154. Bowler, Peter J. (2001). Reconciling science and religion: the debate in early-twentieth-century Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 194..
  155. "Facts and Stats". Church of England. Archived from the original on 27 September 2017. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  156. "Research and Statistics". Church of England. Archived from the original on 8 May 2012. Retrieved 9 May 2012..
  157. "Understanding the 21st Century Catholic Community" (PDF). CAFOD, Ipsos MORI. November 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 September 2016. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  158. Pocklington, David (24 April 2019). "St George's Day: Church and State". Archived from the original on 18 December 2019. Retrieved 18 December 2019.
  159. Wolfgang Vierick (1964), Der English Dialect Survey und der Linguistic Survey of Scotland – Arbeitsmethoden und bisherige Ergebnisse, Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 31, 333–335 in Shorrocks, Graham (1999). A Grammar of the Dialect of the Bolton Area, Part 1. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. p. 58. ISBN 3-631-33066-9.
  160. The Routes of English.
  161. "The Big Read – Top 100 Books". BBC. Archived from the original on 31 October 2012. Retrieved 27 November 2010.

Sources

Diaspora

External links

England articles
History
Overviews
Ancient
Middle Ages
Early Modern
Late Modern
Contemporary
Prior Kingdoms
Related
Geography
Politics
Culture
Sport
Symbols
British people
British Isles
Politics
Sovereign states
Crown Dependencies
Political cooperation
Geography
Island groups
Lists of islands of
History
(outline)
Island groups
Current states
Former states
Society
Modern languages
Germanic
Celtic
Romance
Other
People
Categories: