Misplaced Pages

Talk:Rubyfruit Jungle: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:32, 1 May 2011 editTreasuryTag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,645 editsm Erm, WP:TPO doesn't seem to mandate deleting it...← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:19, 25 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,676,040 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(33 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{NovelsWikiProject
{{WikiProject Novels|importance=Low}}
|class=Start
{{WikiProject LGBT studies}}
|importance=Low
{{WikiProject Gender studies}}
|needs-infobox=yes
{{WikiProject Women writers |importance=Mid}}
}} }}
{{LGBTProject | class=Start}}
{{WikiProject Gender Studies}}


==Literary significance and criticism should be expanded==
Could this be called a "lick and tell" novel, or would that be another kettle of (bad smelling) fish?


Vague unsourced comments about how other lesbians have related to the novel aren't sufficient, in my opinion. W.C. Harris and Leslie Fishbein among others have excellent literary criticism of the novel, and a simple Google search brings up plenty of less scholarly articles (on places like Medium) by lesbians reflecting on how the novel had personal significance to them. I don't have much experience editing Misplaced Pages but once I get a chance I'd like to go through and add some content to this section.
:Why is this even here? It's pointless and offensive, and pretty much fails at covering any of the
:]. ] 20:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)


] (]) 20:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)


== "As Commentary on Cold War Communism"? Really? == == "As Commentary on Cold War Communism"? Really? ==
Line 22: Line 21:


:I am removing this. The source cited is in German and very difficult to access, no page number is given, and the comment makes no sense. The heading says the book is a comment on 'Communism', and then the text says it's a comment on 'fascism'! (and since when was East Germany "fascist"?). It may be based on something legitimate, as the book is real enough, but per ] it seems too problematic as it stands. ] (]) 13:04, 26 May 2009 (UTC) :I am removing this. The source cited is in German and very difficult to access, no page number is given, and the comment makes no sense. The heading says the book is a comment on 'Communism', and then the text says it's a comment on 'fascism'! (and since when was East Germany "fascist"?). It may be based on something legitimate, as the book is real enough, but per ] it seems too problematic as it stands. ] (]) 13:04, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

== Much ado about nothing indeed ==

Concerned editors removed a harmless, childish comment on the talk page but not the silly, questionable "In popular culture" section in the article. ] (]) 04:24, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:19, 25 February 2024

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconNovels Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLGBTQ+ studies
WikiProject iconThis article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
WikiProject iconGender studies
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconWomen writers Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Literary significance and criticism should be expanded

Vague unsourced comments about how other lesbians have related to the novel aren't sufficient, in my opinion. W.C. Harris and Leslie Fishbein among others have excellent literary criticism of the novel, and a simple Google search brings up plenty of less scholarly articles (on places like Medium) by lesbians reflecting on how the novel had personal significance to them. I don't have much experience editing Misplaced Pages but once I get a chance I'd like to go through and add some content to this section.

149.130.183.250 (talk) 20:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

"As Commentary on Cold War Communism"? Really?

A few months ago, User:65.96.92.140 added: "Several critics have posited that the work is largely an allegorical representation of, and commentary on, fascist political movements of the mid Cold War, East Germany most specifically." Citation was to Strobel, Katja. Wandern, Mäandern, Erzählen: Die Pikara als Grenzgängerin des Subjekt. Munich, Germany: Fink. 1998.

I'm not going to mess with this verifiably cited claim, but does anyone else find it a little bit goofy? Literary scholars love to make far-fetched, speculative connections -- that's how they get tenure -- but having this particular one in a very brief article on this book seems unfair to the high school student who is trying to write a book report on "Rubyfruit Jungle". Couldn't it be something like, "Literary critics have applied a wide variety of readings to this novel, among others, that..."

That being said, if in fact this is a mainstream and plausible view among Rita Mae Brown experts, I withdraw the comment. (I didn't know until reading this article that she got a PhD in political science, so maybe she was immersed in Cold War German politics while writing Rubyfruit Jungle? Llajwa 12:41, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

I am removing this. The source cited is in German and very difficult to access, no page number is given, and the comment makes no sense. The heading says the book is a comment on 'Communism', and then the text says it's a comment on 'fascism'! (and since when was East Germany "fascist"?). It may be based on something legitimate, as the book is real enough, but per WP:REDFLAG it seems too problematic as it stands. Paul B (talk) 13:04, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Much ado about nothing indeed

Concerned editors removed a harmless, childish comment on the talk page but not the silly, questionable "In popular culture" section in the article. Gandydancer (talk) 04:24, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Categories: