| Revision as of 18:50, 4 May 2011 editJohn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers215,593 edits fmt← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:49, 9 August 2021 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)Tag: AWB | ||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == |
== August 2011 == | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]. Users are expected to ] with others |
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | ||
| In particular, |
In particular, ] states: | ||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. | |||
| # '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.''' | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | ||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you continue |
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you continue edit warring, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ]<sup>]</sup> 03:17, 14 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == Ian Tomlinson == | |||
| Hi Elvellian | |||
| There's an ongoing discussion regarding the wording of the lead in the Ian Tomlinson article. SlimVirgin asked one of the editors previously involved in the discussion to if he would like to comment, but she seems to have forgotten to ask you. The discussion is , if you'd like to share your views. | |||
| Cheers, ] (]) 10:57, 22 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:49, 9 August 2021
August 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Death of Ian Tomlinson. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
In particular, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Jayjg 03:17, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Ian Tomlinson
Hi Elvellian There's an ongoing discussion regarding the wording of the lead in the Ian Tomlinson article. SlimVirgin asked one of the editors previously involved in the discussion to if he would like to comment, but she seems to have forgotten to ask you. The discussion is here, if you'd like to share your views. Cheers, 87.113.118.169 (talk) 10:57, 22 June 2012 (UTC)