Misplaced Pages

Leet: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:09, 9 March 2006 editNetoholic (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users39,916 edits do not remove dispute tags← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:25, 10 January 2025 edit undoDocWatson42 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers218,122 edits See also: Alphabetized the list and performed other minor cleanup.Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Online slang and alternative orthography}}
{{TotallyDisputed}}
{{Other uses}}
{{OriginalResearch}}
{{pp-move|small=yes}}
{{More citations needed|date=December 2023}}
]]" sticker]]


'''Leet''' (or "'''1337'''"), also known as '''eleet''' or '''leetspeak''', or simply '''hacker speech''', is a system of modified spellings used primarily on the ]. It often uses character replacements in ways that play on the similarity of their ]s via ] or other resemblance. Additionally, it modifies certain words on the basis of a system of ] and alternative meanings. There are many ] or ] in different ].
'''Leet''' is a ] which has arisen in parallel to the worldwide adoptions of textual communications. These communications can be in particular on ]s on the internet, ]s, ], ], and others. Leet, primarily due to its rapidly changing vocabulary and syntax, as well as adoption of and integration of other languages, has not gained official status as a language recognized by any international body. However, many publications have referred outright to Leet as a language, with some also using the term ].


The term "leet" is derived from the word '']'', used as an adjective to describe skill or accomplishment, especially in the fields of ] and ]. The leet lexicon includes spellings of the word as ''1337'' or ''leet''.
What is clear is that Leet is an evolving language. Further, as Leet is partially a cipher based upon other languages (in that respect being almost parasitic), other languages have adopted a Leet-like cipher, in turn creating additional Leet-dialects. These languages include ], ], ], and ].


==History==
Leet, self-referentially, is often referred to as "l33t" or "1337". The name ''Leet'' itself is derived from the word '']'' (also ''31337''). Elite has been used in the past to designate a group of users as belonging to a higher social echelon than other users. Originally, "elite" had been reduced to one syllable, "'leet". The origins of the use of "elite" itself is popularly considered to stem from the classic game '']'' for the ]/] and contemporary machines, where Elite was the highest status in a series of combat rankings.
Leet originated within ]s (BBS) in the 1980s,<ref name=mitchell>Mitchell.</ref><ref name=bbc>An Explanation of l33t Speak.</ref> where having "elite" status on a BBS allowed a user access to file folders, games, and special chat rooms. The ] hacker collective has been credited with the original coining of the term, in their text-files of that era.<ref>{{cite web|last=Mello|first=John P.|url=http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/Google-Expands-Bug-Bounty-Program-81668.html|title=Google Expands Bug Bounty Program|date=February 2, 2015|website=E-Commerce Times}}</ref> One theory is that it was developed to defeat ] created by BBS or ] ] for message boards to discourage the discussion of forbidden topics, like ] and ].<ref name=mitchell/> Creative misspellings and ASCII-art-derived words were also a way to attempt to indicate one was knowledgeable about the culture of computer users.


Once reserved for ], crackers, and ]s, leet later entered the mainstream.<ref name=mitchell/> Some consider ]s and ], like smiley faces, to be leet, while others maintain that leet consists of only symbolic word obfuscation. More obscure forms of leet, involving the use of symbol combinations and almost no letters or numbers, continue to be used for its original purpose of obfuscated communication. It is also sometimes used as a scripting language. Variants of leet have been used to evade censorship for many years; for instance "@$$" (ass) and "$#!+" (shit) are frequently seen to make a word appear censored to the untrained eye but obvious to a person familiar with leet. This enables coders and programmers especially to circumvent filters and speak about topics that would usually get banned. "Hacker" would end up as "H4x0r", for example.<ref>{{Cite web|title=A guide to leetspeak|url=https://www.ionos.com/digitalguide/online-marketing/social-media/what-is-leetspeak/|access-date=2021-12-17|website=IONOS Digitalguide|date=17 November 2021 |language=en}}</ref>
== Origins of Leet ==


]s showing 1337]]
Leet has its basis in written communication over electronic media. It may have been originated by the ], an online group using ] to ] ]. {{fact}} Most simply, it has evolved as a way of forming exclusive ]s in on-line communities, notably ]s and ] (see ]).


Leet symbols, especially the number 1337, are ]s that have spilled over into some culture. Signs that show the numbers "1337" are popular motifs for pictures and are shared widely across the Internet.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cnn.com/2014/03/11/opinion/10-classic-internet-memes/index.html|title=10 classic memes that owned the Internet|first=Ben|last=Huh|website=]|date=March 12, 2014|access-date=April 23, 2013}}</ref>
The mechanism began simply: taking standard text and corrupting it with a dynamic cipher, only those privy to the cipher could understand what was being conveyed in the ciphertext. Through this, newcomers to a given community were excluded from communication with those who had defined (and continued to evolve) the cipher.


=== Algospeak ===
Primitive Leet was generally much less elaborately substituted than modern forms. Typical transpositions included:
{{main article|Algospeak}}
] shares conceptual similarities with leet, albeit with its primary purpose to circumvent algorithmic ], "algospeak" deriving from ''algo'' of ''algorithm'' and ''speak''. These are ]s that aim to evade ], especially ] or hindering ].<ref>{{cite news |last=Lorenz |first=Taylor |title=Internet 'algospeak' is changing our language in real time, from 'nip nops' to 'le dollar bean' |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=8 April 2022 |url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/04/08/algospeak-tiktok-le-dollar-bean/ |access-date=2 January 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= https://theconversation.com/what-is-algospeak-inside-the-newest-version-of-linguistic-subterfuge-203460 |title=What is 'algospeak'? Inside the newest version of linguistic subterfuge |date=13 April 2023 |access-date=2 January 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonytellez/2023/01/31/mascara-unalive-corn-what-common-social-media-algospeak-words-actually-mean/?sh=634d52092a08 |title='Mascara,' 'Unalive,' 'Corn': What Common Social Media Algospeak Words Actually Mean |website=] |access-date=2 January 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexandralevine/2022/09/16/algospeak-social-media-survey/?sh=37d539855e10 |title=From Camping to Cheese Pizza, 'Algospeak' is Taking over Social Media |website=] |access-date=2 January 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |chapter-url= https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3543873.3587355 |doi=10.1145/3543873.3587355 |chapter=How Algorithm Awareness Impacts Algospeak Use on TikTok |title=Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022 |date=2022 |last1=Klug |first1=Daniel |last2=Steen |first2=Ella |last3=Yurechko |first3=Kathryn |pages=234–237 |isbn=9781450394192 |s2cid=258377709 |access-date=2 January 2024}}</ref> One prominent example is using the term "unalive" as opposed to the verb "kill" or even "suicide". Other examples include using "restarted" or "regarded" instead of "retarded" and "seggs" in place of "sex". These phrases are easily understandable to humans, providing either the same general meaning, pronunciation, or shape of the original word. It is furthermore often employed as a more contemporary alternative to leet. The approach has gained more popularity in 2023 and 2024 due to the ] with the topic's contentious nature on the Internet, especially on ] and ] platforms.<ref>{{cite news |last=Nix |first=Naomi |title=Pro-Palestinian creators use secret spellings, code words to evade social media algorithms |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=20 October 2023 |url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/10/20/palestinian-tiktok-instagram-algospeak-israel-hamas/ |access-date=2 January 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.foxnews.com/tech/how-pro-palestinians-using-algospeak-dodge-social-media-scrutiny-disseminate-hateful-rhetoric |title=How pro-Palestinians are using 'Algospeak' to dodge social media scrutiny and disseminate hateful rhetoric |website=] |date=23 October 2023 |access-date=2 January 2024}}</ref>


==Orthography==
* f / ph ("fone phreaks")
One of the hallmarks of leet is its unique approach to ], using substitutions of other letters, or indeed of characters other than letters, to represent letters in a word.<ref name=sterling>Sterling, 70.</ref><ref name="goss 80">Blashki & Nichol, 80.</ref> For more casual use of leet, the primary strategy is to use quasi-]s, symbols that closely resemble (to varying degrees) the letters for which they stand.
* z / s (generally only in the final position, ie. "phi1ez" but not "za1ezman")
* 1 / l
* k / c
* 0 / o


The choice of symbol is not fixed: anything the reader can make sense of is valid in leet-speak. Sometimes, ] would work around a nickname being already taken (and maybe abandoned as well) by replacing a letter with a similar-looking digit.
For users of the ], communities began to use ] pictographic characters as letter substitutes <!-- reference Gay, below --> Over time these tendencies of replacing letters became increasingly exaggerated.


* However, leet is also seen in situations where the ] (e.g. secret language) characteristics of the system are required, either to exclude newbies or outsiders in general, i.e., anything that the ''average'' reader ''cannot'' make sense of is valid; a valid reader should themselves try to make sense, if deserving of the underlying message.
Another early derivation of the letter replacing phenomenon was the prefix "k-" to some words. This began with the redundant substitution of "k" for "c" as seen in "k-kool" but was soon transposed to the much more common and enduring "k-rad". The roots of the term "k-rad" are most likely mocking of the mid- to late-] use of the term "radical" (compare "]" of the ]), which was itself abbreviated to "rad."
* Mild leet can be used to mess with ] "as is".


Another use for leet orthographic substitutions is the creation of paraphrased passwords.<ref name=mitchell/> Limitations imposed by websites on password length (usually no more than 36) and the characters permitted (e.g. alphanumeric and symbols)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://help.pearsoncmg.com/rumba/b2c_self_reg/en/Content/b2c_signin_guidelines.html|title=Username and Password Guidelines|website=help.pearsoncmg.com|access-date=2019-12-10}}</ref> require less extensive forms when used in this application.
After the emergence of Leet on bulletin boards and other non-real-time communications media, Leet found something of a renaissance in real-time protocols such as ] ('''IRC''') and ] (such as AIM). It can be said that something of a conflict exists between those who use Leet in communication on such realtime services, and those who do not.


]
Through this process, Leet acquired an increasingly expanding vocabulary. As Internet slang grew (such as ], ], and so on), it was absorbed into Leet (and subsequently enciphered). Along the way, additional languages began to be enciphered with Leet-like processes (see ''"krieg"'', ''"ist"'' below). In this regard, Leet resembles a ], a ], or ].


Some examples of leet include:
In addition to the broader vocabulary, Leet's ciphers became even more complex and dynamic. Where originally, a one-to-one relationship existed between the source and cipher text (such as "e" -> "3"), newer one-to-many and many-to-many ciphers began to emerge (such as "a" -> "@", "4", and so on).
* '']''.
* ''n00b'' -- a term for "noob", the stereotypical ].
* The '''l33t''' programming language.
* ''"E5C4P3"'': stylized cover of ]'s ] album.
* ''k3w1'' deciphers as "kewl" (which is derived from "cool").
* The web-comics '']'' and '']'', which contain characters who speak variations of leet.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Gallagher |first1=Fred |last2=Caston |first2=Rodney |title="MegaTokyo - Speak L33t?" |url=https://megatokyo.com/strip/9 |website=MegaTokyo |access-date=2024-01-31}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Hussie |first1=Andrew |title===> |url=https://www.homestuck.com/story/1528 |website=Homestuck |access-date=2024-01-31}}</ref>
* The digit "5" in ] nickname.
* Upside-down "1337" (with a bar under "1") also reads as "LEET" (example on the photo).
* "DEF 4L7" plates are used by Defalt, a hacker from the ] videogame (the first in the series).
* ] reads as modified "]".
* "1 (4/\/"7 |_|/\/[)3|2574/\/[) '/0|_||2 \/\/|2171/\/9.17’5 (0/\/|=|_|51/\/9" is heavily leet-styled "I can’t understand your writing. It’s confusing".
* Sometimes, a word can be typed in leet with digits only:
** "360" codes word "EGO" in leet.
** "1687" or "1987" can be used to hint to IGBTs, e.g. ]s.
** "2007 2008" deciphers as "''qoot qoob''" (which is derived from "cute cube").
** "2077" (as a hint to ]) can be jokingly used towards ];
** "11363015" means ''LIEGEOIS'', e.g. ]. <!-- "''Liégeois''" is also a name for a certain popular product by Zott. !-->
** "12314734813" happens to cover "RELATEABLE" word.
** "137 17 83 137 17 60" hides "let it be, let it go" phrase
** "4150" may stand for "ALSO"
** "33571 - 18124" unravels as "''] - ]''".
* Alternatively, sometimes 3 or 6 letters can be leet-ified into a valid ]:
** <span style="color:#614D05">█</span> "614D05" is a valid HEX-code for a dark shade of gold color, referencing ];
** <span style="color:#572E55">█</span> "572E55" (or <span style="color:#572355">█</span> "572355") is a dark purple color, coming from the word "STRESS";
** <span style="color:#1C373A">█</span> "1C373A" is a dark cyan ("icy") color, derived from "ICE TEA";
** <span style="color:#C47C47">█</span> "C47C47" is a peach-orange color related to ]s;
** <span style="color:#C01025">█</span> "C01025" is a pink-ish shade of red, derived from the word "COLORS";
** <span style="color:#D35327">█</span> "D35327" is a dark orange color, produced from "DESERT" word.
** <span style="color:#B07713">█</span> "80771E" is a yellowish-orange color, produced from "BOTTLE" word.


* Spelling given names in Leet in a way the output would reference to something is also possible.
Several outside sources have been instrumental in the formation and evolution of Leet as a dialect or cipher. Primarily, the exclusive nature of enciphering text in communities drove the evolution of the cipher. Additionally, in online games where certain text was forbidden (such as swearing, causing corruptions like "]ed" -> "phux0red"), newer, more clever ciphers had to be created to prevent software limitations from hindering communication. The same sort of evolution has been spurred by ] content filters which may prevent a user from including certain words in their "written" communication. As such, in addition to the socially exclusionary properties of using a cipher, it may be said that Leet is used as a means to defeat ] engines used for matching content in written communication.
** For example, the female name "Marisa" can be spelled as /\/\AR15/\ - with a reference to the ] platform.


However, leetspeak should not be confused with ], characterized by using "4" as "for", "2" as "to", "b&" as "ban'd" (e.g. "banned"), "gr8 b8, m8, appreci8, no h8" as "great bait, mate, appreciate, no hate", and so on.
More recently, the exclusive value of Leet as a cipher has been reduced. As Leet has become popular in the common Internet "vernacular", many users who would previously have been excluded by enciphered text have "caught on" to the cipher. Even highly irregular ciphers (see below for a full discussion of various ciphers) have proven to be easily decipherable by users determined to do so. Because of this, using Leet in discussion has become something of a novelty or ]. Users, instead of attempting to exclude other people with the cipher, have instead been using Leet to indicate that they are part of the Leet-using ], or to mock the existence thereof.


Curiously, as Leet's effectiveness as a cipher has waned, the language has evolved due to its continued use in communities which tend to value it solely for humor value. The process of using Leet for humor, combined with its highly flexible and dynamic nature, causes it to metamorphose into further derivations of its original cipher. Thus, the language evolves, its vocabulary expands, and new expressions emerge from older constructs.

==Sociological considerations==
]'' surreptitiously makes reference to Leet in the amount of his wager.]]

Leet can be defined as an expression of the general laws of ] as it applies to small ] or ]. Leet is a manifestation of the need to maintain an ] ] in the midst of 'outsiders' (in this case, ''ignorant masses''). In so doing, users have invented novel ] and ] styles. Such is common ], and many other ] behaviors (such as ]) have similar mechanisms and effects. In literature, an example of this behavior can be found in '']''.

A trajectory through social acceptance on the Internet could be seen as:
#The "newbie" stage, wherein a user is ignorant about languages and customs.
#A "Leet" stage, where a user may over-compensate in their actions, by using Leet excessively, so as to "fit in" with the "elite" social cadre. These users may also attempt to ostracize other users who have not progressed to such a stage.
#A more "orthodox" stage, in which attention is paid to grammar and spelling. Communities seeking credibility in the eyes of the rest of the Internet may seek to portray this level of maturity. It is at this stage when Leet is most used in a ] tone.

Yet another view is that obsessive attention to grammar, vocabulary, and spelling is increasingly outmoded on the current medium (the Internet) or the current period (of increasing ]). Underemployed ]s - a group that is well known for fastidious attention to ] - may constitute a large portion of the group that assess themselves as highly Internet-savvy, and (conversely) Leet users somehow less-savvy. While ], (the prime locus of the aforementioned group) may serve as a ] for ], live languages are known to evolve (sometimes rapidly).

It may be said that part of the difficulty around use of the Leet dialect is due to the fact that it is an early example of emergent language in a non-spoken medium. As languages rarely have arisen out of non-spoken communication, a dialect which arises out of a ] of written languages and ] does not fit into the normal descriptions of language. As such, it is not offered any protection based upon ethnicity or nationality (whereas speakers of ] in a primarily ] speaking forum may expect some deference based on Italian being their native language, users of Leet may have no such consideration).

As such, Leet has been viewed almost universally as a misuse of language, as well as a misuse of resources. Users who do not engage in "Leet speak" complain that having to de-cipher the text is irritating. Conversely, users who do engage in the practice tend to argue that they are not intending for non-Leet-speaking users to read their communication.

Ironically, despite the fact that Leet itself does not symbolize any one ethnicity or nationality, it does represent a homologous group of users: "residents" of the Internet. Similarly, the position that use of Leet is indicative of level of Internet mastery may seem a thinly-veiled ] or ] criticism (cf. the ]; the ] Controversy).

Because of the problems surrounding its lack of a spoken component, as well as its (seemingly) ] beginnings, there has recently been something of a ] attached to use of the Leet cipher. Because of its popularity with ], ] organizations have seen fit to warn parents about the cipher. Parents, it is reasoned, may not be able to understand what their children are saying in ], ]'s, or instant messenging, and dismiss it as nonsense. It is argued that children may be discussing such nefarious things as ]. have been published to help parents decipher their children's Leet-enciphered communication.

Despite the hurdles to attaining social acceptance, Leet has become such a part of common culture that the cipher is used even in mainstream advertising, such as the ] ] ''"HE4T"'' ] and ]. Entire websites have been written with the Leet cipher, such as ]'s ], and ]'s "xx-hacker" .

Additionally, Leet's use is proliferated by the increasing number of systems that require more secure passwords. The Leet spelling alterations often fulfill the need for non-dictionary passwords, while remaining easy to remember.

==The Leet cipher and syntax==
The Leet cipher is a highly dynamic, subjective cipher. It can be applied to many languages and character sets. As it incorporates new vocabulary and ]s, the set of transliterations and corruptions increases. As the cipher was originally based upon ] and the ], it is possible to derive a very basic set of common transliterations and corruptions. Leet speak is also known to some as n00bish (a language used primarily by chat/forum n00bs).

===Common transliterations===
The cipher itself is highly dynamic, and subject to stylistic interpretation. A simple list of transliterations follows:


=== Table of leet-speak substitutes for normal letters ===
{| class="wikitable" style="empty-cells: show; text-align:center;" {| class="wikitable" style="empty-cells: show; text-align:center;"
|- style="vertical-align:top;" |- style="vertical-align:top;"
Line 78: Line 82:
!G !G
!H !H
!I !I
!J !J
!K !K
!L
!L&nbsp;<sup>&dagger;</sup>
!M !M
!N !N
!O !O
!P !P
Line 89: Line 93:
!R !R
!S !S
!T
!T&nbsp;<sup>&dagger;</sup>
!U !U
!V !V
Line 97: Line 101:
!Z !Z
|- style="vertical-align:top;" |- style="vertical-align:top;"
|<!--A-->| <code> 4 <br /> /\ <br /> @ <br /> /-\ <br /> ^ <br /> ä <br /> ª <br /> aye <br /> ∂ </code> |<!--A-->| <code> a <br> 4 <br> /\ <br> ] <br> /-\ <br> ^ <br>(L<br> ]</code>
|<!--B-->| <code> 8 <br /> 6 <br /> 13 <br /> |3 <br /> ß <br /> P> <br /> |: <br /> !3 <br /> (3 <br /> /3 <br /> )3 </code> |<!--B-->| <code> b <br> I3 <br> 8 <br> 13 <br> |3 <br> ] <br> !3 <br> (3 <br> /3 <br>)3 <br> |-] <br> j3 </code>
|<!--C-->| <code> [ <br /> ¢ <br /> < <br /> ( <br /> © </code> |<!--C-->| <code> c <br> ] <br> < <br> (<br> ]</code>
|<!--D-->| <code> ) <br /> o| <br /> [) <br /> I> <br /> |> <br /> ? <br /> T) </code> |<!--D-->| <code> d <br> ) <br> |) <br> (| <br> </code>
|<!--E-->| <code> 3 <br /> & <br /> £ <br /> ë <br /> [- <br /> <br /> ê <br /> |=- </code> |<!--E-->| <code> e <br> 3 <br> & <br> ] <br> ] <br> [- <br> |=- </code>
|<!--F-->| <code> = <br /> ƒ <br /> |# <br /> i= <br /> ph <br /> /= </code> |<!--F-->| <code> f <br> |= <br> ] <br> |# <br> ph <br> /= <br> v </code>
|<!--G-->| <code> G <br /> g <br /> 6 <br /> & <br /> (_+ <br /> 9 <br /> C- <br /> gee <br /> (γ, </code> |<!--G-->| <code> g <br> 6 <br> & <br> (_+ <br> 9 <br> C- <br> gee <br> (?, <br> [, <br> {, <br> <- <br>(. </code>
|<!--H-->| <code> # <br /> /-/ <br /> <br /> ]-~-[ <br /> ? <br /> }-{ </code> |<!--H-->| <code> h <br> ] <br> /-/ <br>\-\ <br> ]-~[ <br> }{ <br> !-! <br> 1-1 <br> \-/ <br> I+I <br> ? </code>
|<!--I-->| <code> 1 <br /> ! <br /> | <br /> & <br /> eye <br /> 3y3 <br /> ï <br /> ] </code> |<!--I-->| <code> i <br> 1 <br> | <br> ][ <br> ! <br> eye <br> 3y3 </code>
|<!--J-->| <code> j <br /> _| <br /> ; <br /> _/ <br /> </ <br /> (/ </code> |<!--J-->| <code> j <br> ,_| <br> _| <br> ._| <br> ._] <br> _] <br> ,_] <br> ] </code>
|<!--K-->| <code> X <br /> |< <br /> |{ <br /> ]{ <br /> }< <br /> |( </code> |<!--K-->| <code> k <br> >| <br> |< <br> 1< <br> |c <br> |(</code>7<
|<!--L-->| <code> 1 <br /> £ <br /> 7 <br /> 1_ <br /> | <br /> |_ <br /> # <br /> l </code> |<!--L-->| <code> l <br> 1 <br> 7 <br> 2 <br> £ <br> |_ <br> |</code>
|<!--M-->| <code> M <br /> m <br /> //. <br /> |v| <br /> <br /> {V} <br /> |\/| <br /> /\/\ <br /> (u) <br /> V <br /> (V) <br /> (\/) <br /> /|\ <br /> Μ <br /> М <br /> м </code> |<!--M-->| <code> m <br> /\/\ <br> /V\ <br> <br> |\/| <br> ^^ <br> <\/> <br> {V} <br> (v) <br> (V) <br> |\|\ <br> ]\/[ <br> nn </code><code> 11 </code>
|<!--N-->| <code> // <br /> ^/ <br /> |\| <br /> /\/ <br /> <br /> <\> <br /> {\} <br /> \ <br /> n <br /> /V <br /> </code> |<!--N-->| <code> n <br> ^/ <br> |\| <br> /\/ <br> <br> <\> <br> {\} <br> /V <br> ^ <br> <br> ] <br> </code>
|<!--O-->| <code> 0 <br /> () <br /> ?p <br /> <br /> * <br /> ö </code> |<!--O-->| <code> o <br> 0 <br> () <br> oh <br> <br> p <br> <> <br> Ø </code>
|<!--P-->| <code> ^ <br /> |* <br /> |o <br /> |º <br /> |^(o) <br /> |> <br /> |" <br /> 9 <br /> D <br /> |̊ <br /> |7 </code> |<!--P-->| <code> p <br> |* <br> |o <br> |] <br> ? <br> |^ <br> |> <br> |" <br> 9 <br> D <br> |] |7 </code>
|<!--Q-->| <code> q <br /> (_,) <br /> ()_ <br /> 0_ <br /> <| </code> |<!--Q-->| <code> q <br> (_,) <br> ()_ <br> 2 <br> 0_ <br> <| <br> & <br> 9 <br> ] <br> ⁋ <br> ] </code>
|<!--R-->| <code> 2 <br /> P\ <br /> |? <br /> /2 <br /> |^ <br /> lz <br /> ® <br /> ] <br /> 2 </code> |<!--R-->| <code> r <br> I2 <br> 9 <br> |` <br> |~ <br> |? <br> /2 <br> |^ <br> lz <br> 7 <br> 2 <br> 12 <br>] <br> ] <br> .- </code> <br> |2 <br> |-
3 <br> 4
|<!--S-->| <code> S <br /> s <br /> 5 <br /> 2 <br /> $ <br /> z <br /> § <br /> ehs <br /> es </code>
|<!--T-->| <code> 7 <br /> + <br /> <nowiki>-|-</nowiki> <br /> 1 <br /> '][' <br /> </code> |<!--S-->| <code> s <br> 5 <br> $ <br> z <br> ] <br> ehs <br> es <br> 2 </code>
|<!--U-->| <code> (_) <br /> |_| <br /> v <br /> ü <br /> Ü </code> |<!--T-->| <code> t <br> 7 <br> + <br> <nowiki>-|-</nowiki> <br> ']] <br> «|» <br> ~|~ </code>
|<!--V-->| <code> \/ <br /> \_/ </code> |<!--U-->| <code> u <br> (_) <br> |_| <br> v <br> L| <br> บ </code>
|<!--W-->| <code> \/\/ <br /> vv <br /> '// <br /> \^/ <br /> (n) <br /> \V/ <br /> \// <br /> \X/ <br /> \|/ <br /> \_|_/ <br /> \_:_/ <br /> ] </code> |<!--V-->| <code> v <br> \/ <br> |/ <br> \| <br> </code>
|<!--X-->| <code> >< <br /> ] <br /> }{ <br /> ecks <br /> × <br /> )( </code> |<!--W-->| <code> w <br> \/\/ <br> vv <br> \N <br> '// <br> \\' <br> \^/ <br> \/\/ <br> (n) <br> \V/ <br> \X/ <br> \|/ <br> \_|_/ <br> \_:_/ <br> uu <br> 2u <br> \\//\\// <br> <br> ] <br>]<br /></code>
|<!--Y-->| <code> Y <br /> y <br /> j <br /> `/ <br /> Ý <br /> ÿ <br /> ý <br /> Ŷ <br /> ŷ <br /> Ÿ <br /> Ϋ <br /> Υ <br /> Ψ <br /> φ <br /> λ <br /> Ұ <br /> ұ <br /> ў <br /> ץ <br /> צ <br /> -) <br /> ] </code> |<!--X-->| <code> x <br> >< <br> }{ <br> ecks <br> ] <br> ] <br> }{ <br>)(<br> ][ </code>
|<!--Z-->| <code> <code> 2 <br /> z <br /> ~\_ <br /> ~/_ <br /> % </code> |<!--Y-->| <code> y <br> j <br> `/ <br> \|/ <br> ] <br> \//</code><code><nowiki>`|΄ </nowiki></code>
|<!--Z-->| <code> z <br> 2 <br> 7_ <br> -/_ <br> % <br> >_ <br> s <br> ~/_ <br> -\_ <br /> -|_</code>
|-
| colspan="27" | <sup>&dagger;</sup> Note the use of 7 for either L or T.
|} |}


==Morphology==
J, Q, and Y typically are not transliterated and are often used as themselves. There are some common Leet alternatives for other sounds, e.g. "cks" is often replaced with an "x" as in "hax0r" and "sux0rs" (hacker and sucks/suckers). Characters such as € and ü are used, usually designating a new user or new member of the community.


Text rendered in leet is often characterized by distinctive, recurring forms.
Additionally, letters in the middle of words may be transposed. This has become the subject of some discussion in the linguistics community . People seem to be able to discern meaning from words in which the first and last letters are correctly placed, even if the intervening letters are incorrectly placed.
;''-xor'' suffix
:The meaning of this suffix is parallel with the English ''-er'' and ''-or'' suffixes (seen in ''hacker'' and ''lesser'')<ref name=bbc/> in that it derives ]s from a verb ]. It is realized in two different forms: ''-xor'' and ''-zor'', {{IPAc-en|-|s|ɔːr}} and {{IPAc-en|-|z|ɔːr}}, respectively. For example, the first may be seen in the word ''hax(x)or'' (''H4x0r'' in leet) {{IPAc-en|ˈ|h|æ|k|s|ɔːr}} and the second in ] {{IPAc-en|ˈ|oʊ|n|z|ɔːr}}. Additionally, this ] may also be ] with all of the suffixes of regular ]. The letter 'o' is often replaced with the numeral 0.
;''-age'' suffix
:Derivation of a noun from a verb stem is possible by attaching ''-age'' to the base form of any verb. Attested derivations are ''pwnage'', ''skillage'', and ''speakage''. However, leet provides exceptions; the word ''leetage'' is acceptable, referring to actively being ''leet''.<ref name="goss 79">Blashki & Nichol, 79.</ref> These nouns are often used with a form of "to be" rather than "to have," e.g., "that was pwnage" rather than "he has pwnage". Either is a more emphatic way of expressing the simpler "he pwns," but the former implies that the person is ''embodying'' the trait rather than merely possessing it.
;''-ness'' suffix
:Derivation of a noun from an adjective stem is done by attaching ''-ness'' to any adjective. This is entirely the same as the English form, except it is used much more often in Leet. Nouns such as ''lulzness'' and ''leetness'' are derivations using this suffix.
;Words ending in ''-ed''
:When forming a past participle ending in ''-ed'', the Leet user may replace the ''-e'' with an apostrophe, as was common in ] of previous centuries, (e.g. "pwned" becomes "pwn'd"). Sometimes, the apostrophe is removed as well (e.g. "pwned" becomes "pwnd"). The word ending may also be substituted by ''-t'' (e.g. ''pwned'' becomes ''pwnt'').<ref name="blanc33">LeBlanc, 33.</ref>
;Use of the ''-&'' suffix
:Words ending in ''-and'', ''-anned'', ''-ant'', or a similar sound can sometimes be spelled with an ] (''&'') to express the ending sound (e.g. "This is the ]", "I'm sorry, you've been b&", "&hill/&farm"). It is most commonly used with the word ''banned''. An alternative form of "B&" is "B7", as the ampersand is with the "7" key on the standard US keyboard. It is often seen in the abbreviation "IBB7" (in before banned), which indicates that the poster believes that a previous poster will soon be banned from the site, channel, or board on which they are posting.


==Grammar==
While the intentional transposition of letters in language is novel {{fact}} Davis and Rawlinson have demonstrated that readers of most languages are capable of understanding the meaning of a word, provided complex phonemes and ] are not corrupted. Because the meaning is easily conveyed, even with severe corruption of the original wording, the transpositions and substitutions can become quite elaborate.


Leet can be pronounced as a single syllable, {{IPA|/ˈliːt/}}, rhyming with ''eat,'' by way of ] of the initial vowel of "elite". It may also be pronounced as two syllables, {{IPA|/ɛˈliːt/}}. Like ], leet enjoys a looser grammar than standard English. The loose grammar, just like loose spelling, encodes some level of emphasis, ironic or otherwise. A reader must rely more on intuitive ] of leet to determine the meaning of a sentence rather than the actual sentence structure. In particular, speakers of leet are fond of ] nouns, turning verbs into nouns (and back again) as forms of emphasis, e.g. "Austin rocks" is weaker than "Austin roxxorz" (note spelling), which is weaker than "Au5t1N is t3h r0xx0rz" (note grammar), which is weaker than something like "0MFG D00D /\Ü571N 15 T3H l_l83Я 1337 Я0XX0ЯZ" (], dude, Austin is the ]-elite rocks-er!). In essence, all of these mean "Austin rocks," not necessarily the other options. Added words and misspellings add to the speaker's enjoyment. Leet, like hacker slang, employs analogy in construction of new words. For example, if ''haxored'' is the past tense of the verb "to hack" (hack → haxor → haxored), then ''winzored'' would be easily understood to be the past tense conjugation of "to win," even if the reader had not seen that particular word before.
==== Word endings ====


] and ]]]<!-- ] representation]] -->
=====Use of "x0r" and "z0r"=====
Leet has its own colloquialisms, many of which originated as jokes based on common typing errors, habits of new computer users, or knowledge of ] and history.<ref name="goss 81">Blashki & Nichol, 81.</ref> Leet is not solely based upon one language or character set. Greek, Russian, and other languages have leet forms, and leet in one language may use characters from another where they are available. As such, while it may be referred to as a "]", a "dialect", or a "language", leet does not fit squarely into any of these categories. The term ''leet'' itself is often written ''31337'', or ''1337'', and many other variations. After the meaning of these became widely familiar, ''10100111001'' came to be used in its place, because it is the ] form of ''1337'' decimal, making it more of a puzzle to interpret. An increasingly common characteristic of leet is the changing of grammatical usage so as to be deliberately incorrect. The widespread popularity of deliberate misspelling is similar to the cult following of the "]" phrase. Indeed, the online and computer communities have been international from their inception, so spellings and phrases typical of non-native speakers are quite common.
Note that the construction "-xor" or any variation thereof can be pronounced variously as "-ker", "-zor", or "-ksor" (the latter two being the way the majority of English speakers would pronounce it).


==Vocabulary==
The suffix -x0r or -z0r at the end of a verb can be used on all tenses of a verb (pwnx0r, had pwnxored, will have pwnx0red, will pwnx0r; perfect, pluperfect, future perfect, future) with the exception of present or imperfect (pwns or was pwning). Also, the -x0r or z0r ending can describe one who does the action (similar to ]) such as a pwnx0r or a hax0r, meaning one who "pwns" or hacks, respectively. The term "hax0r" can also refer to someone who is skilled to the extent that they might as well be hacking.
] t-shirt using leet to highlight ] vulnerability]]
Many words originally derived from leet have now become part of modern ], such as "]".<ref name=mitchell/> The original driving forces of new vocabulary in leet were common misspellings and typing errors such as "]" (generally considered lolspeak), and intentional misspellings,<ref name="goss 83">Blashki & Nichol, 83.</ref> especially the "z" at the end of words ("skillz").<ref name=mitchell/> Another prominent example of a surviving leet expression is '']'', an exclamation of joy.<ref name=bbc/> w00t is sometimes used as a ] for "We owned the other team."


New words (or corruptions thereof) may arise from a need to make one's username unique. As any given Internet service reaches more people, the number of names available to a given user is drastically reduced. While many users may wish to have the username "CatLover," for example, in many cases it is only possible for one user to have the moniker. As such, degradations of the name may evolve, such as "C@7L0vr." As the leet cipher is highly dynamic, there is a wider possibility for multiple users to share the "same" name, through combinations of spelling and transliterations.
In the phrase "r0x0r j00r b0x0rz", "b0x0rz" refers not to "]" (i.e. ]) but actually to "boxes" (in computer slang: computers, though '']'' or ''b0x3n'' may be more commonly used in this context). The more naïve interpretation "rocks your boxers" is still meaningful, however, as the sentiment is much the same and is often used to carry a connotation that one was 'rocked' so hard they felt it in their boxer shorts.


Additionally, ''leet''—the word itself—can be found in the ] and ] of many Internet and video games. Use of the term in such a manner announces a high level of skill, though such an announcement may be seen as baseless ].<ref name=hope>Computer Hope Dictionary.</ref>{{More detail needed}}<!-- This seems short. -->
The term "r0x0r j00r b0x0r" itself probably relates to ] itself, with a person being able to gain access to and, from there, "rock their box". It is also possible that it is a derivative from "r0x0r j00r s0x0r", "rocks your socks" (The phrase is used to denote some magnitude or importance). ] is also a type of proxy.
<!-- NOTE: ANY FURTHER ADDITIONS MUST HAVE A PROPER REFERENCE OR WILL BE REMOVED PER WP:OR -->


===Terminology and common misspellings===
An increasingly common use of the "-xor" is changing its grammatical usage to be deliberately incorrect. Instead of using "Bob r0x0r", "Bob am teh r0x0r" or "Bob are teh r0x0r" is deliberately used to increase the level of irony and to separate it from less ironic, true Leet. This deliberate misspelling is similar to the cult following of the ] phrase.
'']'' (nominally {{IPAc-en|w|ɛər|z}}) is a plural shortening of "software", typically referring to cracked and redistributed software.<ref name=hope/> '']'' refers to the hacking of telephone systems and other non-Internet equipment.<ref name=mitchell/> '']'' originated as a typographical error of "the", and is sometimes spelled ''t3h''.<ref name=mitchell/><ref name="blanc34 35">LeBlanc, 34-35.</ref> ''j00'' takes the place of "you",<ref name=bbc/> originating from the ] sound that occurs in place of the ], {{IPA|/j/}}, when ''you'' follows a word ending in an ] ] consonant, such as {{IPA|/t/}} or {{IPA|/d/}}. Also, from German, is '']'', which means "over" or "above"; it usually appears as a prefix attached to adjectives, and is frequently written without the ] over the ''u''.<ref name=dutch>Van de Velde & Meuleman.</ref>


====Haxor and suxxor (suxorz)====
Due to the phonetic sound of "xor" (ksor), Leet speakers quickly began using "zor" and "zorz" as well and in similar context. "zorz" however is often used on the end of every major word in a sentence for comedic effect such as "H0ly sh1tzorz j00 0wnzorzed himzorz upz!1"
''Haxor'', and derivations thereof, is leet for "hacker",<ref name="blanc30 32">LeBlanc, 30; 32.</ref> and it is one of the most commonplace examples of the use of the ''-xor'' suffix. ''Suxxor'' (pronounced suck-zor) is a derogatory term which originated in ] culture and is currently{{when|date=February 2023}} used in multi-user environments such as multiplayer video games and ]; it, like ''haxor'', is one of the early leet words to use the ''-xor'' suffix. ''Suxxor'' is a modified version of "sucks" (the phrase "to suck"), and the meaning is the same as the English slang. ''Suxxor'' can be mistaken with ''Succer/Succker'' if used in the wrong context. Its negative definition essentially makes it the opposite of ''roxxor'', and both can be used as a verb or a noun. The letters ''ck'' are often replaced with the Greek Χ (]) in other words as well.


====n00b====
Additionally, the suffix "]" may be added to words in the same way as "zor," "xor," and similar may be used. This practice entered the popular culture based upon ] ]'s use of the term.
{{main|Newbie}}


Within leet, the term ''n00b'' (and derivations thereof) is used extensively. The term is derived from '']'' (as in new and inexperienced, or uninformed),<ref name="goss 83"/><ref name=dutch/><ref name=acronym/> and is used to differentiate "n00bs" from the "elite" (or even "normal") members of a group.
=====Use of the ''-age'' suffix=====
Many times, a verb will be changed into a noun simply by adding ''-age'' in addition to adding 'ness' to the end of an adjective, such as ''speak'' becoming ''speakage'' or leet becoming leetage, as in "1 k//0w 1337//355 5p34k4g3" or "h15 pwn4g3 sh00d b3 ph33r3d'".


====Owned and pwned====
Due to the fluid nature of Leet, such (derived) nouns can subsequently be used (again) as verbs: "h3 pwn4g3d m3," for example.
{{anchor|Pwn}}
{{redirect|Pwn}}
]'' comic strip]]
''Owned'' and ''pwned'' (generally pronounced "poned"<ref name="mw"></ref> ) both refer to the domination of a player in a video game or argument (rather than just a win), or the successful hacking of a website or computer.<ref>{{cite book|url=http://publik.tuwien.ac.at/files/pub-inf_4395.pdf |title=Pwned – 10 Tales of Appropriation in Video Games|author= Pichlmair, Martin}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Computer Slang |url=http://books.ifmo.ru/book/vip/196.pdf |date=December 9, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081209115317/http://books.ifmo.ru/book/vip/196.pdf |archive-date=December 9, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Ludlow|first1=Peter|last2=Wallace|first2=Mark|date=2007|title=The Second Life Herald|publisher=MIT Press|page=|isbn=978-0-262-12294-8|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/secondlifeherald00ludl/page/53}}</ref><ref name=mitchell/><ref name=dutch/><ref name="blanc32 33">LeBlanc, 32-33.</ref> It is a slang term derived from the verb '']'', meaning to appropriate or to conquer to gain ownership. As is a common characteristic of leet, the terms have also been adapted into noun and adjective forms,<ref name=dutch/> ''ownage'' and ''pwnage'', which can refer to the situation of ''pwning'' or to the superiority of its subject (e.g., "He is a very good player. He is pwnage.").


The term was created accidentally by the misspelling of "own" due to the keyboard proximity of the "O" and "P" keys. It implies domination or humiliation of a rival,<ref name=Naone>{{cite news | author=Naone, Erica |date=November 2008| title=The Flaw at the Heart of the Internet| work=]| volume=111| number=6| pages= 62–67}}</ref> used primarily in the ]-based ] to taunt an opponent who has just been soundly defeated (e.g., "You just got pwned!").<ref>{{cite book | author=Peckham, Aaron |date=2007| title=Mo' Urban Dictionary: Ridonkulous Street Slang Defined| publisher= Andrews McMeel Publishing|page=230| isbn=978-0-7407-6875-0}}</ref> In 2015 ] added pwn to their Official Scrabble Words list.<ref>{{Cite news | title=Go Forth And Pwn For Shizzle, Word List Guardians Tell Scrabble Players| url=https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/05/21/408508565/go-forth-and-pwn-for-shizzle-say-scrabble-word-list-s-guardians| access-date=2020-07-05| newspaper=NPR| date=21 May 2015| language=en| last1=Chappell| first1=Bill}}</ref>
=====Words ending in ''-ed''=====
Words ending in ''-ed'' may have ''-nt'' substituted. A common example of this would be ''pwned'' -> ''pwnt''. This should not be confused with misspellings such as ''samrt'' for ''smart''.


====The grammar==== ====Pr0n====
{{anchor|Pr0n}}
Leet, like other ], enjoys a loose grammar. Because the deliberate misusage of grammar, just like spelling, encodes some of the level of emphasis, ironic or otherwise, a reader must rely more on intuitive parsing of Leet to determine the meaning of a sentence rather than the actual sentence structure. In particular, speakers of Leet are fond of ] nouns, turning verbs into nouns (and back again) as forms of emphasis (e.g. ''"Bob rocks"'' is weaker than ''"Bob r0xx0rz"'' (spelling) is weaker than ''"Bob is t3h r0xx0r"'' (grammar)). Leet, like in other hacker slang, employs overgeneralization in construction of new words. For example, if ''"h4xx0r3d"'' is the past tense of the verb ''"to hack"'' (hack->haxxor->haxxored), then ''"bl0wz0r3d"'' would be easily understood to be the past tense conjugation of ''"to blow"'', even if the reader had not seen that particular word before (e.g: ''"I g0+ t3h qu4d damag3 4nd bl0wz0r3d h1m up!!1"'').
''Pr0n'' is ] for '']''.<ref name=mitchell/> This is a deliberately inaccurate spelling/pronunciation for ''porn'',<ref name=acronym>The Acronym Finder.</ref> where a zero is often used to replace the letter O. It is sometimes used in legitimate communications (such as email discussion groups, ], chat rooms, and Internet web pages) to circumvent language and ]s, which may reject messages as offensive or ]. The word also helps prevent ] from associating commercial sites with pornography, which might result in unwelcome traffic.{{Citation needed|date=March 2011}} ''Pr0n'' is also sometimes spelled backwards (n0rp) to further obscure the meaning to potentially uninformed readers. It can also refer to ] depicting pornographic images, or to photos of the internals of consumer and industrial hardware. ''Prawn'', a spoof of the misspelling, has started to come into use, as well; in '']'', a pornographer films his movies on "Prawn Island". Conversely, in the ] '']'', '']'', referring to a kind of ], is spelled ''pr0n'', leading to the creation of food items such as "pr0n chow mein".
''"Pwnz0r3d"'' is used often in the same way as owned hence ''"1 pwnz0r3d his @$5 L4s+ N1gh+ on C$''" (I "pwned" his ass last night on CS
Also see ].
(]))


== See also ==
Also, any word ending in -xor (eg h4xx0r) can be construed as a noun, thus rendering "I @m t3h h@xx0r" grammatically correct.
{{Portal|Internet|Language}}

* ]
==== Rhyming and rhythm ====
* ]
While Leet is not generally spoken, it can be deemed close to ]. Care is taken by users of Leet to combine similarly timed words, or to encipher words into ways such that they have a common rhythm or rhyme. The archetypal example of this is the phrase "roffle my woffles" (note both spelling error, "woffle", and word timing). Other examples would be "r0xed j00r s0x" (in this case, only matching sounds). Leet can be highly lyrical and stylistic (even ]) the way a typical ] language can be.
** ]

* ] and ]
==== Over-exclamation and other emphasis ====
* ]
Another common feature of Leet is over-exclamation, where a sentence is postfixed with many exclamation marks: ''pHu><x0|2z j00 L4yMUr!!!!!!!!!!''
* ], a similar phenomenon in Japanese language

In some cases, because the exclamation symbol (!) resides on the same key as the number one ("1"), over-exclamation can be accidentally typed with extraneous digits, owing to the excitement of the typist: ''y0 d00d th1s 5h1zZ47 R0Xx0rzZ!!!!!11''. This was especially likely in the context of online multiplayer games, such as ]. Some Leet speakers purposely type exactly one "1" for every 3 "!"s. This is a satire of noob players who let go of the shift key too soon and some of their intended exclamation marks become the number 1.

The number mistyped for "!" varies on different Non-English keyboard layouts as "Shift + 1" is not always the combination for "!". For example, those using the ] keyboard layout on their computer will mistype the number 4 for "!" as the key combination is "Shift + 4" in the Hungarian setting. Thus, this area of Hungarian leetspeak will appear differently (eg. "!!!!444!!!" instead of "!!!!111!!!") from its English counterpart.

Additionally, the adjacent ~ (tilde) and @ keys may be used in this fashion: ''t3h leik this OwNz!!11!?!??!@!!????//1!!~~'' Some users have adopted this and include it deliberately.

A growing phenomenon is deliberately typing the ''word'' "one": ''pwnz0r3d!!!!!11oneoneone'', and deliberately typing the words "exclamation mark", as in the next example. In some cases, this has been purposely exaggerated for comic effect, for example, ''L0l!!!11!eleventy-one1!1!11one1!!!exclamationmark!!11oneone!1''. It can also be used to poke fun at users of ], and other "lesser" cultures. Note that letter-to-number translations tend not to occur within these "oneoneone" blocks.

Another example of accidental misspelling may also be used in this manner, such as "omg!!11oneoneelven", where elven is the misspelling of eleven. On rare occasions "]!!!!shift+1!!!" has shown up, where the user is taking it further and typing the keyforms that make up letters. This is also usually used only when poking fun at people who happen to over-use exclamation marks as well as other punctuation. One might respond to someone saying "}{31p /\/\3 p13a53!!!!!!!!1" by saying "No!!11oneoneshift+1!!!".

Even more ] is the insertion of non-one numbers into a phrase as well as improper acronym usage in a humorous way, such as
"OMGWTFBBQ!!11!11FORTYTWO!!111!!17!1NINE!1111!1! ", where 42 comes in as a joke stemming from the '']'' series of novels.

Yet another variation of the use of "one" in over-exclamation ] is the phrase "eleventyone," a reference to the distinctive way ] say the number 111 (in J.R.R. Tolkien's ''The Fellowship of the Ring''). Hence "LoL!!!!111eleventyoneone!"

Among the most strained echelons of the over-exclamation, particularly related to the number one, are mathematical formulas which could become ''OMGWTFBBQ!!1!]]!1!!uno!!''

The trend is not limited to English speakers, and in many forums a mix of English and other languages can be observed, for example the ], "OMFG das rockt!!!!1111einsshifteins".

In certain circumstances it is also considered humorous to add long random strings of characters to represent wild enthusiasm to the point where the user is banging on his/her keyboard, such as "OMG!!!!!!?????????????????"#$?%"?#$%{`"#$+%&{#`$&+'%{`'&+H{'@j;[hpgkyprtij#`E$+{". This is also occasionally followed by "NO CARRIER", harking back to the old days of analog modems that would frequently disconnect with a barrage of garbage characters.

Along this line is the mispelling of "?" following the same line of "!" The most common being "/" and "slash", as in: W@t r j00 ta1kin b0u+, n00b???//??/?SLASH//?QUESTIONMARK? ("What are you talking about newb?")

In addition to variations on punctuation-based emphasis, it is common to combine two (or more) words and capitalize them to show emphasis. Perhaps most common would be the combination of "omg" and "wtf" to produce "OMGWTF". Also common is "NOWAY/NOWAI" (from "no way"). Constructions such as these are frequently reduced to abbreviations when their use becomes frequent, and repeated typing becomes time consuming (such as "holy fucking shit" -> "HOLYFUCKINGSHIT" -> "HFS!").

As with most alternate Leet spellings or grammar, inclusion of these traits in a sentence is done on purpose. The intent is typically to either lighten the mood, strengthen a point (by mocking someone who may not be party to the discussion), or convey a sense of irony, depending on the context.

==== Vocabulary ====
{{main|Internet slang}}

Many words originally derived from Leet slang have now become part of the modern Internet slang, such as "]". The primary driving force of new vocabulary in Leet is the need to describe new phoneomena. <!-- abc news --> Additionally, the common (intentional) misspellings such as "]", and especially the "z" at the end of words ("skillz"). Another prominent example of a surviving Leet expression is the ever-popular "]" (now sometimes purposely done as w0t0). Gamers in particular may use Leet in a sarcastic manner, e.g. "ph34/2 m`/ 1337 sk1llz" ("Fear my leet skills"), as the practice is frowned upon by the community.

Another location for similar text obfuscation is in multiplayer gaming, especially involving other characters from the ] set. Some multiplayer games allow for users to be evicted (kicked out) by issuing a simple command such as "!kick username." To foil this method, some users have resorted to making their usernames difficult to type. An example of this would be "E'li'†è Hàxo'r".

Additionally, new words (or corruptions thereof) may arise from a need to make one's username unique. As Internet gaming reaches more people, the number of names available to a given user is drastically reduced. While many users may wish to have the username "]", in many cases it is only possible for one user to have the monniker. As such, degradations of the name may evolve, such as "M00ad'd33b" and so on. As the Leet cipher is highly dynamic, there are virtually limitless combinations of ]s and transliterations.

In addition to the common transliterations and enciphering, misspelling (intentionally) is particularly prevalent in Leet dialects.

Frequently, common typing errors are also absorbed. Transposition of adjacent characters is a common construction (make -> maek, you -> yuo, is -> si). Other common misspellings now standard in Leet are:

* "evar", "evah", and "eva" for "ever." Generally used the phrase "Worst. <something>. Evar." (Worst. Game. Evar.) This construct is largely credited as a reference to a phrase oft uttered by ], a recurring character on '']''.
* ] "ist" for "is" has crept into Leet, including English encipherings. Frequently used with word "death". (mp3 ist death.) Also, "krieg" &mdash; German for "war" &mdash; in this context means, approximately, "favourable". (mp3 ist krieg). This may be a parody of the ] song ]. Tends to be especially prevalent in ] communities.
* "smrt" or "samrt" for "smart" (The former may also be an intentional reference to an episode of '']'' in which ] misspells ''smart'' in song whilst burning his ] ]: "I am so smart! I am so smart! S-M-R-T! I mean S-M-A-R-T!")
* "]" or "t3h" for "the". "Teh" is the archetypal example of Leet's letter-transposition construction. Additionally, "teh" may have a different grammatical function from "the". Consider the following: "I rock" versus "I am teh r0xx0r." "Teh" is often used to show sarcasm, carrying far less seriousness than the traditional "The".
* "gom" for "omg" for "oh my god/gosh!". Originating from gomgomgom in which the user moved the last g to the beginning.
* "pron", "prawn", "pr0n", etc., for '']''. Due to the prevalence of pornography in Leet-speaking communities, "porn" has many derivatives.
*"r" for "are", "y" for "why" and "u" for "you," although this is also(possibly more often) considered to be AOL-chatroom speak, and mocked.

==== Kekeke ====
It is widely believed that the expression "kekeke" comes from Korean players of ]. It is an ] Korean phrase similar to the English "hahaha", Spanish "jajaja" or Japanese "huhuhu", and is meant to express ]. It is often used in-game as an expression of exhultation or as a form of mockery. Commonly, it is associated with a simple Starcraft tactic that involves massing a large number of units and using them to rush an enemy base before an opponent is sufficiently prepared to defend. This is often called a ], after the Starcraft faction for whom the tactic was created. The phrase "OMG Zerg Rush! kekeke!!" is sometimes used outside of the game to indicate any form of overwhelming or swarming force.

Some English speakers use "kekeke" as a form of laughing, although it is still primarily used by Korean speakers.

The phrase also occurs on the ] ], although its origin is completely different. There are two major factions in the game which 'speak' different languages. All chat text entered by a member of one faction will appear jumbled to a member of the other, and vice versa. As a result, members of the Horde faction will see "kek" when a member of the Alliance faction had typed "lol". This is often extended, and "lolololol" becomes "kekekekek". This has become an in-joke amongst World of Warcraft players.

The term has also found its way to public chat channels on ].

==== Pwn ====
{{main|pwn}}

'''Pwn''' refers to the domination of a player in a video game (rather than just a win). For example, one pwning another is equivalent to scoring a dramatic kill, or several kills, in a video game shooter, against the other person. Similarly, to "get pwned" means that a more skilled player in a game has scored a convincing or even humiliating victory against you. Outside games 'pwnd' describes being in a highly humiliating position. The term "z0r" may also be suffixed for added affect: "pwnz0red". There is also pwnt, pwnded, and pwndizzled. Disputable as true 1337, but still used often, is the term y0d4, or any variation of y0d4 in Leet, such as `/Oc|/-\, meaning "you owned (pwned) dem all."

The origin of the term is controversial and many claim to have invented it. Due to its nature, the term is most likely to have occured in several places at the same time (due to a common misspelling of the word "own", caused by the proximity of 'P' and 'O' keys on QWERTY keyboards), similar to the discovery of the ]. Several other theories of the term include {{fact}}:
*Meaning power-owned (I own you all), or pistol-owned and this is certainly used in particular circles.
*If you remove the vertical line on a 'p', it leaves the shape of an 'o'.
*Is the sound made trying to say "own","owned", etc. while laughing.

===== Cans of Pwnage =====
Cans of pwnage is a newly evolving term in 1337speak, which is traditionally used to denote "ownage" or "pwnage" in which the 1337 person (person A) typically pwns the "nubcake" or "nubcaek" (person B). So if person A got a headshot on person B, for example, person A may say something along the lines of "I just open3d a can of pwn4ge on you nubcake," or "I just opened a can of pwnage on you nubcake." The phrase originated from professional wrestler ]'s popular tagline "open up a can of whoop-ass."

Also used in the phrase "I need to go down to the corner store and buy some more cans of pwnage." Occasionally, when the 1337 speaker feels the need to be extremely 1337, a higher quantity of pwnage is used. For example, if person A just picked up the double damage and killed five players, he might exclaim "ph34r my keg of pwnage, nubcakes!!11" in which "ph34r," "keg of pwnage," "nubcakes," and over-exclamation are all used to heighten the dramatic effect and 1337ness of the speaker. The "keg" of pwnage, rather than merely a "can," especially correlates the effect, and the 1337 pwner feels extremely powerful.

"Pwnage" isn't always the term used when measuring the quantity of one's l33tness. Like most of Leet, there are many variations, such as "Can o l33tsauce," "pwnz0rized," etc. Sometimes, the verb pwn isn't always used. In the event where player A kills player B, one might also brag of "fragging j00r a$$" or merely use a simple interjection such as "w00t" or "nubb"

==== Newbies, the nubcake, and nub ====
{{main|newbie}}

Within Leet, the term "newbie" (and derivations thereof) is used extensively. This is due in part to its origins as a means of segregating the "elite" echelon from outsiders. A contemporary derivative of "newbie" (or "n00b") is the ''&quot;nubcake"''. ''Nubcake'' may be used in conjunction with puns such as "what do you eat for ], nubcakes?" While nubcake is in itself not entirely offensive, it is derived fom the term "noob," which is generally viewed as being diminutive, and alludes to "cupcake," which can be used in a demeaning fashion. Additionally, the term nubcake may evoke the pejorative "fruitcake," which references both people with mental/learning difficulties and homosexuals.

Further corruption of ''nubcake'' may lead to products such as ''nubcaek'', ''nublet'', ''nubsauce'', and so on.

In primitive Leet as used on BBS systems in the 1980s and into the very early 1990s, the usual term was "greenie" which was derived from the cowboy slang "greenhorn." A variant was "Christmas greenies" which referred to the phenomenon where BBS systems were flooded with new members immediately following ] and ] because ]s were a common holiday gift. If the greenie was young, the term "ruggie" (derived from "rugrat" meaning "child") might be used.

Contrary to popular belief, the term "n00b" does not have the same meaning as "newbie." "n00b" refers to a person who has, for instance, played a game for a considerable amount of time but attained no increase in skill, compared to a "newbie," who has little or no experience in said game.

==== Roffle, ''Roffles'', and combinations thereof ====
{{main|Roffle}}


Among the early Internet slang were "rofl," "lol," and others indicating an appreciation of humor. As such, derivations thereof quickly became incorporated into the Leet vocabulary. Leet is prone to corruptions of words to suit rhythm and rhyming. This, in addition to various plays on the word (such as the "ROFLCOPTER","ROFLAMETHROWER", "LOLERBLADES", "LOLERSKATES", "LOLipops", "lollergasm", "lollercoaster", etc) has led to the creation of phrases such as ''"roffle my woffles"'' (misspelled for humor's sake). Also ROFLMAO (Roling On the Floor Laughing My Ass Off) led to ''"RUFFLES WITH MAYO"''.

Another "pheared" 1337 phrase is, "1s1k". Used almost exclusively in FPS games, "1s1k" refers not only to a person's playing style, but also to his "1337" ability. Standing for "one shot, one kill", this moniker draws on the great tradition of snipers in the world today. Where as any n00b can record a kill using (and wasting) a large amount of ammunition, "1s1k" points to the player's adherence to using sniper rifles, also known as "chocolate chips." Ex. after a team member is sniped "I wouldn't venture out there fellas. This sniper's got talent... 1s1k".

Another term which has been seen mainly around those playing AOK (Age of Empires 2 : Age of Kings) but has spread from there is 11. The reason for this is that in the game you type 11 and it plays a sound of someone laughing, so it comes out as the same a lol or rofl etc.

== Problems classifying Leet as a language ==

=== Relative youth ===
While most languages have a long history, Leet has no such history. In fact, Leet is no older than a few decades. Determining an exact taxonomy of Leet is therefore rather difficult. Leet is more accurately described in terms of itself. As Leet evolves, it gains more vocabulary and additionally nuanced syntax, through ] applying its syntax to itself (in this respect, Leet is not unlike a ]).

=== Lack of appropriate terminology ===
As Leet is largely defined in terms of itself, or the languages it corrupts, very little terminology exists to classify it. The term "meme" comes close in some respects, but fails significantly in others. The abovementioned terms fail in similar ways.

=== Problems publishing research ===
Because Leet is not an internationally recognized language, and because it lacks a set of formal definitions, referring to it in publications is difficult. Further, publishing research ''in'' Leet is problematic due to the a lack of proper indexing, professional sanctioning bodies, peer reviewers, and so on. To illustrate this, imagine a text written in Leet being indexed in a library in which most of the text is in English. Additionally, while publications such as ] include text in Leet, there are very few (or indeed none) currently-published journals in Leet.

==See also==
===Related===
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*], a ] in which some characters speak in Leet
*]
*]
*]
*'']''
*], a small town just downstream from Pittsburgh

=== Similar and related corruptions ===
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ], a glossary and usage dictionary of computer programmer slang
* ] and its "lolspeak", a similar phenomenon in 21st century English language
* ], a similar phenomenon in Chinese language
* ], a similar phenomenon in Russian language
* ]
* ], a similar phenomenon in Korean language
* ] case, involving interpreting the word's letters as digits


=== Terminology === ==Footnotes==
{{Reflist}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

=== Leet in the Internet Social Corpus ===
* ], the stereotypical ]
* ], Linkin Park's album of remixed songs (the singles are corrupted with Leet)
* ]
* ], the title of a 2002 science-fiction drama film
* ], humorous British website, described as a "puerile digital arts community"
* ''""'', Popular television series on
* ]


==References== ==References==
{{refbegin|30em}}
=== Vocabulary ===
* {{cite web | url=http://acronymfinder.com/ | title=The Acronym Finder | publisher=Mountain Data Systems, LLC | access-date=2007-04-11 }} {{fix|text=inline citation needed|date=May 2020}}
* {{jargon}}
* {{cite web | title=An Explanation of l33t Speak | url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A787917 | work=h2g2 | publisher=BBC | date=2002-08-16 | access-date=2007-03-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110906114613/http://www.bbc.co.uk:80/dna/h2g2/A787917 | archive-date=2011-09-06 }}
<!-- this might be {{cite journal}} instead, but {{cite web}} works well enough -->
* {{cite web <!-- Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society Vol 3, No. 2 --> * {{Cite journal | journal = Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society | volume = 3 | issue=2 |
| title=Game Geek’s Goss: Linguistic Creativity In Young Males Within An Online University Forum (94/\/\3 933k’5 9055oneone) title = Game Geek's Goss: Linguistic Creativity In Young Males Within An Online University Forum | last1 = Blashki | first1 = Katherine | last2 = Nichol | first2 = Sophie | year=2005 | pages=77–86 | url = http://www.swinburne.edu.au/sbs/ajets/journal/V3N2/pdf/V3N2-2-Blashki.pdf }}
* {{cite web | title=Computer Hope Dictionary - Game definitions | url=http://www.computerhope.com/jargon/game.htm | publisher=Computer Hope | access-date=2007-04-02}} {{fix|text=inline citation needed|date=May 2020}}
| last=Blashki
* {{cite web | url=http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/ | title=The Free Dictionary -- Acronyms | work=The Free Dictionary | publisher=Farlex, Inc | access-date=2007-04-11 }} {{fix|text=inline citation needed|date=May 2020}}
| first=Katherine
* {{cite web|title=Google Directory - Computers |url=http://www.google.org/alpha/Top/Computers/Programming/Languages/Obfuscated/ |access-date=2007-04-29 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070930224351/http://www.google.org/alpha/Top/Computers/Programming/Languages/Obfuscated/ <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 2007-09-30}} {{fix|text=inline citation needed|date=May 2020}}
| coauthors=Nichol, Sophie
* {{cite book|title=E-Mail Essentials: How to Make the Most of E-Communications|last=Haig|first=Matt|year=2001|publisher=Kogan Page|isbn=978-0-7494-3576-9|page=89}} {{fix|text=inline citation needed|date=May 2020}}
| accessdate=6 March
* {{cite thesis | last=LeBlanc | first=Tracy Rene | date=May 2005 | title="Is There A Translator in Teh House?": Cultural and Discourse Analysis of a Virtual Speech Community on an Internet Message Board | type=MA thesis | publisher=Louisiana State University | url=https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/4112/ |doi=10.31390/gradschool_theses.4112 | doi-access=free }}
| accessyear=2006
* {{cite web | title=A Leet Primer | last=Mitchell | first=Anthony | date=2006-06-12 | access-date=2007-04-10 | url=https://www.technewsworld.com/story/47607.html | work=Technology News | publisher=ECT News Network, Inc | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201110030926/https://www.technewsworld.com/story/47607.html | archive-date=2020-11-10 }}
| url=http://www.swin.edu.au/sbs/ajets/journal/issue5-V3N2/AJETSV3N205Blashki.pdf
* {{Cite journal
}}
| last1 = Perea | first1 = M.
| last2 = Duñabeitia | first2 = J. A.
| last3 = Carreiras | first3 = M.
| doi = 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.237
| title = R34D1Ng W0Rd5 W1Th Numb3R5
| journal = Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
| volume = 34
| issue = 1
| pages = 237–241
| year = 2008
| pmid = 18248151
| s2cid = 6054151
| url = http://www.uv.es/~mperea/leet1.pdf
|issn=0096-1523}} {{fix|text=inline citation needed|date=May 2020}}
* {{Cite book|title=The New Hacker's Dictionary|last1=Raymond|first1=Eric R.|last2=Steele|first2=Guy L.|year=1996|publisher=MIT Press|isbn=978-0-262-68092-9}} {{fix|text=inline citation needed|date=May 2020}}
* {{cite web | title=relax we understand j00 | last=Rome | first=James Andrew | date=2001-12-18 | access-date=2007-05-03 | publisher=], The International English Honor Society. ], Beta Beta Chapter | url=http://www.case.edu/orgs/sigmataudelta/submissions/rome-relaxweunderstand.htm |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070216195207/http://www.case.edu/orgs/sigmataudelta/submissions/rome-relaxweunderstand.htm <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 2007-02-16}}
* {{cite book | last=Sterling | first=Bruce | author-link=Bruce Sterling | title =The Hacker Crackdown: Law and Disorder on the Electronic Frontier | journal=Printout of the Electronic Version | publisher=Bantam Spectra Books | location=New York | year=1994 | page= | isbn=978-0-553-56370-2 | title-link=The Hacker Crackdown | bibcode=1994hcld.book.....S }}
* {{cite web | title=Lexical tensions in 'internet english' : 1337 as language? | last=Van de Velde | first=Kristof | author2=Meuleman, Jeroen | year=2004 | access-date=2007-04-13 | url=http://www.verbumvanum.org/kristof/index.html | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070429020757/http://www.verbumvanum.org/kristof/index.html | archive-date=2007-04-29 | url-status=dead }}
* {{cite web | url=http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~crwth/LOL.html | title=The creation of "LOL" | first=Wayne | last=Pearson | access-date=2008-11-06}} {{fix|text=inline citation needed|date=May 2020}}
{{refend}}


==Further reading==
=== Classification as language / dialect / etc ===
* {{cite thesis |last=Katelnikoff |first=Joel |date= 2013 |title=SCROLL / NETWORK / HACK: A Poetics of ASCII Literature (1983-1989) |type=PhD dissertation |publisher=University of Alberta |url=https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/e81f69d0-7ce9-4013-8d73-8b06eef85b2f |doi=10.7939/R3PG1J01C }}
* {{cite web
| title=Lexical tensions in 'internet english': 1337 as language?
| last=Van de Velde
| first=Kristof
| coauthors=Meuleman, Jeroen
| year=2006
| url=http://www.verbumvanum.org/kristof/index.html
| accessdate=29 January
| accessyear=2006
}}
* {{cite web
| title=A History and Analysis of the 'l33t' Dialect"
| last=Dyck
| first=Sasha
| accessdate=12 January
| accessyear=2006
| year=2003
| url=http://www.goshen.edu/~sashamd/l33t/
}}
<!-- "Making oneself understood in an e-commerce transaction requires use of a digital language in a manner that is not adequately addressed by either written or verbal precedents." -->
<!-- "It is imperative at this point that I at least mention LEET SPEAK. Adopted widely by the technological elite, this language was initially thought to have evolved when the Internet was adopted by technologically inferior beings who did not understand programming languages. But it has evolved over time and leet speak generators now exist on the WWW as a means of assisting the uninitiated in understanding the concepts being discussed by these digital nomads." -->
* {{cite web
| title=E-commerce lexicon: communicating in brief
| last=Jacobs
| first=Joanne
| accessdate=29 January
| accessyear=2006
| url=http://www.ling.mq.edu.au/centres/sc/jacobs.htm
}}
<!-- this might be {{cite news}} but {{cite web}} works well enough -->
* {{cite web
| title=Silicon Insider: The Leet Guide for Noobs and Nubs
| last=Malone
| first=Michael S
| accessdate=6 March
| accessyear=2006
| url=http://abcnews.go.com/Business/SiliconInsider/story?id=1650985&page=1
}}


==External links==
=== Syntax and structure ===
{{Wiktionary|leet}}
* {{cite web
*{{cite web
| title=Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy
| url = https://www.osgu.ac.in/programs/bachelor-of-computer-science-engineering-b-tech-cse-cse-leet/
| last=Davis
| title = B.Tech/B.Tech (Leet) - CSE (Cloud technology, information security, data science, artificial intelligence, cyber security)
| first=Matt
| work = www.osgu.ac.in/programs ]
| year=2003
| archive-url = https://archive.today/20210522164358/https://www.osgu.ac.in/programs/bachelor-of-computer-science-engineering-b-tech-cse-cse-leet/
| url=http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/~mattd/Cmabrigde/
| archive-date = May 22, 2021
| accessdate=29 January
| accessdate = May 22, 2021
| accessyear=2006
| url-status = live
}}
* {{news reference
| firstname=Graham
| lastname=Rawlinson
| url=http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg16221887.600
| title=Reibadailty
| org=New Scientist
| date=29 May 1999
}}
* {{news reference
| title=Can you raed this?
| firstname=Timothy
| lastname=Lord
| url=http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/09/15/2227256
| org=Slashdot.org
| date=15 September, 2003
}} }}


{{Internet Dialects}}
=== Evolution, current state, and spread ===
{{internet slang}}


{{Authority control}}
* {{cite web
| title=Twin Language
| last=Hudon
| first=Mindy
| accessdate=29 January
| accessyear=2006
| url=http://toddlerstoday.com/resources/articles/twintalk.htm
}}
<!-- "Irregularity in spellings is a relative thing. Take for example, the words "come and some". They are considered irregular because they are not pronounced like " dome, home, gnome, or Rome, pronunciations based on the silent trailing e rule that makes the "o" a long pronunciation. But how often do these latter regular spellings appear while reading compared to the irregular ones. The frequency at which words appear in text has a strong influence on our ability to recognize them; you will easily recognize the word "have" for example, without realizing that it is an irregular spelling. Such an approach is called the "analogy approach" to regularity. Words become regular the more often you see them. Interestingly, the 15 to 20 percent of irregularly spelled words on a typical page appear more frequently in text than regularly spelled words." -->
* {{cite web
| title=Origins of Written Language
| last=Gay
| first=Greg
| accessdate=29 January
| accessyear=2006
| url=http://www.ldrc.ca/contents/view_article/152/
}}

== External links ==
=== Leet guides and instruction ===
* A look at Leet’s popularity, international trends, and security issues.
*
*
*
* &mdash; ]'s guide to computer slang
*
*
*

=== Translation tools ===
* lets you convert words into basic or advanced 1337-speak and back.
*
*
* Provides a Leet interface, as well as allowing transformation of static HTML text into Leet and then to English.
* Allows you to translate websites or plain text into 1337-speak.

{{Leet dialects}}


]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 23:25, 10 January 2025

Online slang and alternative orthography For other uses, see Leet (disambiguation).
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Leet" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (December 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
An "eleet hacker" (31337 H4XØR) laptop sticker, along with a "Free Kevin " sticker

Leet (or "1337"), also known as eleet or leetspeak, or simply hacker speech, is a system of modified spellings used primarily on the Internet. It often uses character replacements in ways that play on the similarity of their glyphs via reflection or other resemblance. Additionally, it modifies certain words on the basis of a system of suffixes and alternative meanings. There are many dialects or linguistic varieties in different online communities.

The term "leet" is derived from the word elite, used as an adjective to describe skill or accomplishment, especially in the fields of online gaming and computer hacking. The leet lexicon includes spellings of the word as 1337 or leet.

History

Leet originated within bulletin board systems (BBS) in the 1980s, where having "elite" status on a BBS allowed a user access to file folders, games, and special chat rooms. The Cult of the Dead Cow hacker collective has been credited with the original coining of the term, in their text-files of that era. One theory is that it was developed to defeat text filters created by BBS or Internet Relay Chat system operators for message boards to discourage the discussion of forbidden topics, like cracking and hacking. Creative misspellings and ASCII-art-derived words were also a way to attempt to indicate one was knowledgeable about the culture of computer users.

Once reserved for hackers, crackers, and script kiddies, leet later entered the mainstream. Some consider emoticons and ASCII art, like smiley faces, to be leet, while others maintain that leet consists of only symbolic word obfuscation. More obscure forms of leet, involving the use of symbol combinations and almost no letters or numbers, continue to be used for its original purpose of obfuscated communication. It is also sometimes used as a scripting language. Variants of leet have been used to evade censorship for many years; for instance "@$$" (ass) and "$#!+" (shit) are frequently seen to make a word appear censored to the untrained eye but obvious to a person familiar with leet. This enables coders and programmers especially to circumvent filters and speak about topics that would usually get banned. "Hacker" would end up as "H4x0r", for example.

Various display devices showing 1337

Leet symbols, especially the number 1337, are Internet memes that have spilled over into some culture. Signs that show the numbers "1337" are popular motifs for pictures and are shared widely across the Internet.

Algospeak

Main article: Algospeak

Algospeak shares conceptual similarities with leet, albeit with its primary purpose to circumvent algorithmic censorship online, "algospeak" deriving from algo of algorithm and speak. These are euphemisms that aim to evade automated online moderation techniques, especially those that are considered unfair or hindering free speech. One prominent example is using the term "unalive" as opposed to the verb "kill" or even "suicide". Other examples include using "restarted" or "regarded" instead of "retarded" and "seggs" in place of "sex". These phrases are easily understandable to humans, providing either the same general meaning, pronunciation, or shape of the original word. It is furthermore often employed as a more contemporary alternative to leet. The approach has gained more popularity in 2023 and 2024 due to the rise in conflict between Israel and Gaza with the topic's contentious nature on the Internet, especially on Meta and TikTok platforms.

Orthography

One of the hallmarks of leet is its unique approach to orthography, using substitutions of other letters, or indeed of characters other than letters, to represent letters in a word. For more casual use of leet, the primary strategy is to use quasi-homoglyphs, symbols that closely resemble (to varying degrees) the letters for which they stand.

The choice of symbol is not fixed: anything the reader can make sense of is valid in leet-speak. Sometimes, a gamer would work around a nickname being already taken (and maybe abandoned as well) by replacing a letter with a similar-looking digit.

  • However, leet is also seen in situations where the argot (e.g. secret language) characteristics of the system are required, either to exclude newbies or outsiders in general, i.e., anything that the average reader cannot make sense of is valid; a valid reader should themselves try to make sense, if deserving of the underlying message.
  • Mild leet can be used to mess with frequency analysis "as is".

Another use for leet orthographic substitutions is the creation of paraphrased passwords. Limitations imposed by websites on password length (usually no more than 36) and the characters permitted (e.g. alphanumeric and symbols) require less extensive forms when used in this application.

The same sticker on one's laptop demonstrates upside-down "31337" as "LEETE"

Some examples of leet include:

  • B1ff.
  • n00b -- a term for "noob", the stereotypical newbie.
  • The l33t programming language.
  • "E5C4P3": stylized cover of Journey's Escape album.
  • k3w1 deciphers as "kewl" (which is derived from "cool").
  • The web-comics Megatokyo and Homestuck, which contain characters who speak variations of leet.
  • The digit "5" in Deadmau5 nickname.
  • Upside-down "1337" (with a bar under "1") also reads as "LEET" (example on the photo).
  • "DEF 4L7" plates are used by Defalt, a hacker from the Watch Dogs videogame (the first in the series).
  • VA-11 HALL-A reads as modified "Valhalla".
  • "1 (4/\/"7 |_|/\/[)3|2574/\/[) '/0|_||2 \/\/|2171/\/9.17’5 (0/\/|=|_|51/\/9" is heavily leet-styled "I can’t understand your writing. It’s confusing".
  • Sometimes, a word can be typed in leet with digits only:
    • "360" codes word "EGO" in leet.
    • "1687" or "1987" can be used to hint to IGBTs, e.g. insulated-gate bipolar transistors.
    • "2007 2008" deciphers as "qoot qoob" (which is derived from "cute cube").
    • "2077" (as a hint to Cyberpunk 2077) can be jokingly used towards "ZOTT" dairy brand;
    • "11363015" means LIEGEOIS, e.g. Liège.
    • "12314734813" happens to cover "RELATEABLE" word.
    • "137 17 83 137 17 60" hides "let it be, let it go" phrase
    • "4150" may stand for "ALSO"
    • "33571 - 18124" unravels as "Eesti - Ibiza".
  • Alternatively, sometimes 3 or 6 letters can be leet-ified into a valid hexadecimal color code:
    • █ "614D05" is a valid HEX-code for a dark shade of gold color, referencing GLaDOS;
    • █ "572E55" (or █ "572355") is a dark purple color, coming from the word "STRESS";
    • █ "1C373A" is a dark cyan ("icy") color, derived from "ICE TEA";
    • █ "C47C47" is a peach-orange color related to cats;
    • █ "C01025" is a pink-ish shade of red, derived from the word "COLORS";
    • █ "D35327" is a dark orange color, produced from "DESERT" word.
    • █ "80771E" is a yellowish-orange color, produced from "BOTTLE" word.
  • Spelling given names in Leet in a way the output would reference to something is also possible.
    • For example, the female name "Marisa" can be spelled as /\/\AR15/\ - with a reference to the AR-15 platform.

However, leetspeak should not be confused with SMS-speak, characterized by using "4" as "for", "2" as "to", "b&" as "ban'd" (e.g. "banned"), "gr8 b8, m8, appreci8, no h8" as "great bait, mate, appreciate, no hate", and so on.


Table of leet-speak substitutes for normal letters

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
a
4
/\
@
/-\
^
(L
Д
b
I3
8
13
|3
ß
!3
(3
/3
)3
|-]
j3
c
[
¢
<
(
©
d
)
|)
(|
e
3
&
£

[-
|=-
f
|=
ƒ
|#
ph
/=
v
g
6
&
(_+
9
C-
gee
(?,
[,
{,
<-
(.
h
#
/-/
\-\
]-~[
}{
 !-!
1-1
\-/
I+I
 ?
i
1
|
][
 !
eye
3y3
j
,_|
_|
._|
._]
_]
,_]
]
k
>|
|<
1<
|c
|(
7<
l
1
7
2
£
|_
|
m
/\/\
/V\

|\/|
^^
<\/>
{V}
(v)
(V)
|\|\
]\/[
nn
11
n
^/
|\|
/\/

<\>
{\}
/V
^

И
o
0
()
oh

p
<>
Ø
p
|*
|o
|º
 ?
|^
|>
|"
9
D
|° |7
q
(_,)
()_
2
0_
<|
&
9


r
I2
9
|`
|~
|?
/2
|^
lz
7
2
12
®
[z
Я
.-

|2
|-

3
4

s
5
$
z
§
ehs
es
2
t
7
+
-|-
']['

«|»
~|~
u
(_)
|_|
v
L|
v
\/
|/
\|
w
\/\/
vv
\N
'//
\\'
\^/
\/\/
(n)
\V/
\X/
\|/
\_|_/
\_:_/
uu
2u
\\//\\//


ω
x
><
}{
ecks
×
?
}{
)(
][
y
j
`/
\|/
¥
\//
`|΄
z
2
7_
-/_
 %
>_
s
~/_
-\_
-|_

Morphology

Text rendered in leet is often characterized by distinctive, recurring forms.

-xor suffix
The meaning of this suffix is parallel with the English -er and -or suffixes (seen in hacker and lesser) in that it derives agent nouns from a verb stem. It is realized in two different forms: -xor and -zor, /-sɔːr/ and /-zɔːr/, respectively. For example, the first may be seen in the word hax(x)or (H4x0r in leet) /ˈhæksɔːr/ and the second in pwnzor /ˈoʊnzɔːr/. Additionally, this nominalization may also be inflected with all of the suffixes of regular English verbs. The letter 'o' is often replaced with the numeral 0.
-age suffix
Derivation of a noun from a verb stem is possible by attaching -age to the base form of any verb. Attested derivations are pwnage, skillage, and speakage. However, leet provides exceptions; the word leetage is acceptable, referring to actively being leet. These nouns are often used with a form of "to be" rather than "to have," e.g., "that was pwnage" rather than "he has pwnage". Either is a more emphatic way of expressing the simpler "he pwns," but the former implies that the person is embodying the trait rather than merely possessing it.
-ness suffix
Derivation of a noun from an adjective stem is done by attaching -ness to any adjective. This is entirely the same as the English form, except it is used much more often in Leet. Nouns such as lulzness and leetness are derivations using this suffix.
Words ending in -ed
When forming a past participle ending in -ed, the Leet user may replace the -e with an apostrophe, as was common in poetry of previous centuries, (e.g. "pwned" becomes "pwn'd"). Sometimes, the apostrophe is removed as well (e.g. "pwned" becomes "pwnd"). The word ending may also be substituted by -t (e.g. pwned becomes pwnt).
Use of the -& suffix
Words ending in -and, -anned, -ant, or a similar sound can sometimes be spelled with an ampersand (&) to express the ending sound (e.g. "This is the s&box", "I'm sorry, you've been b&", "&hill/&farm"). It is most commonly used with the word banned. An alternative form of "B&" is "B7", as the ampersand is with the "7" key on the standard US keyboard. It is often seen in the abbreviation "IBB7" (in before banned), which indicates that the poster believes that a previous poster will soon be banned from the site, channel, or board on which they are posting.

Grammar

Leet can be pronounced as a single syllable, /ˈliːt/, rhyming with eat, by way of apheresis of the initial vowel of "elite". It may also be pronounced as two syllables, /ɛˈliːt/. Like hacker slang, leet enjoys a looser grammar than standard English. The loose grammar, just like loose spelling, encodes some level of emphasis, ironic or otherwise. A reader must rely more on intuitive parsing of leet to determine the meaning of a sentence rather than the actual sentence structure. In particular, speakers of leet are fond of verbing nouns, turning verbs into nouns (and back again) as forms of emphasis, e.g. "Austin rocks" is weaker than "Austin roxxorz" (note spelling), which is weaker than "Au5t1N is t3h r0xx0rz" (note grammar), which is weaker than something like "0MFG D00D /\Ü571N 15 T3H l_l83Я 1337 Я0XX0ЯZ" (OMG, dude, Austin is the über-elite rocks-er!). In essence, all of these mean "Austin rocks," not necessarily the other options. Added words and misspellings add to the speaker's enjoyment. Leet, like hacker slang, employs analogy in construction of new words. For example, if haxored is the past tense of the verb "to hack" (hack → haxor → haxored), then winzored would be easily understood to be the past tense conjugation of "to win," even if the reader had not seen that particular word before.

"1337" represented in both binary and alternate mark inversion

Leet has its own colloquialisms, many of which originated as jokes based on common typing errors, habits of new computer users, or knowledge of cyberculture and history. Leet is not solely based upon one language or character set. Greek, Russian, and other languages have leet forms, and leet in one language may use characters from another where they are available. As such, while it may be referred to as a "cipher", a "dialect", or a "language", leet does not fit squarely into any of these categories. The term leet itself is often written 31337, or 1337, and many other variations. After the meaning of these became widely familiar, 10100111001 came to be used in its place, because it is the binary form of 1337 decimal, making it more of a puzzle to interpret. An increasingly common characteristic of leet is the changing of grammatical usage so as to be deliberately incorrect. The widespread popularity of deliberate misspelling is similar to the cult following of the "All your base are belong to us" phrase. Indeed, the online and computer communities have been international from their inception, so spellings and phrases typical of non-native speakers are quite common.

Vocabulary

A CCCamp t-shirt using leet to highlight password vulnerability

Many words originally derived from leet have now become part of modern Internet slang, such as "pwned". The original driving forces of new vocabulary in leet were common misspellings and typing errors such as "teh" (generally considered lolspeak), and intentional misspellings, especially the "z" at the end of words ("skillz"). Another prominent example of a surviving leet expression is w00t, an exclamation of joy. w00t is sometimes used as a backronym for "We owned the other team."

New words (or corruptions thereof) may arise from a need to make one's username unique. As any given Internet service reaches more people, the number of names available to a given user is drastically reduced. While many users may wish to have the username "CatLover," for example, in many cases it is only possible for one user to have the moniker. As such, degradations of the name may evolve, such as "C@7L0vr." As the leet cipher is highly dynamic, there is a wider possibility for multiple users to share the "same" name, through combinations of spelling and transliterations.

Additionally, leet—the word itself—can be found in the screen-names and gamertags of many Internet and video games. Use of the term in such a manner announces a high level of skill, though such an announcement may be seen as baseless hubris.

Terminology and common misspellings

Warez (nominally /wɛərz/) is a plural shortening of "software", typically referring to cracked and redistributed software. Phreaking refers to the hacking of telephone systems and other non-Internet equipment. Teh originated as a typographical error of "the", and is sometimes spelled t3h. j00 takes the place of "you", originating from the affricate sound that occurs in place of the palatal approximant, /j/, when you follows a word ending in an alveolar plosive consonant, such as /t/ or /d/. Also, from German, is über, which means "over" or "above"; it usually appears as a prefix attached to adjectives, and is frequently written without the umlaut over the u.

Haxor and suxxor (suxorz)

Haxor, and derivations thereof, is leet for "hacker", and it is one of the most commonplace examples of the use of the -xor suffix. Suxxor (pronounced suck-zor) is a derogatory term which originated in warez culture and is currently used in multi-user environments such as multiplayer video games and instant messaging; it, like haxor, is one of the early leet words to use the -xor suffix. Suxxor is a modified version of "sucks" (the phrase "to suck"), and the meaning is the same as the English slang. Suxxor can be mistaken with Succer/Succker if used in the wrong context. Its negative definition essentially makes it the opposite of roxxor, and both can be used as a verb or a noun. The letters ck are often replaced with the Greek Χ (chi) in other words as well.

n00b

Main article: Newbie

Within leet, the term n00b (and derivations thereof) is used extensively. The term is derived from newbie (as in new and inexperienced, or uninformed), and is used to differentiate "n00bs" from the "elite" (or even "normal") members of a group.

Owned and pwned

"Pwn" redirects here. For other uses, see Pwn (disambiguation).
An example of the term pwned in a Laugh-Out-Loud Cats comic strip

Owned and pwned (generally pronounced "poned" ) both refer to the domination of a player in a video game or argument (rather than just a win), or the successful hacking of a website or computer. It is a slang term derived from the verb own, meaning to appropriate or to conquer to gain ownership. As is a common characteristic of leet, the terms have also been adapted into noun and adjective forms, ownage and pwnage, which can refer to the situation of pwning or to the superiority of its subject (e.g., "He is a very good player. He is pwnage.").

The term was created accidentally by the misspelling of "own" due to the keyboard proximity of the "O" and "P" keys. It implies domination or humiliation of a rival, used primarily in the Internet-based video game culture to taunt an opponent who has just been soundly defeated (e.g., "You just got pwned!"). In 2015 Scrabble added pwn to their Official Scrabble Words list.

Pr0n

Pr0n is slang for pornography. This is a deliberately inaccurate spelling/pronunciation for porn, where a zero is often used to replace the letter O. It is sometimes used in legitimate communications (such as email discussion groups, Usenet, chat rooms, and Internet web pages) to circumvent language and content filters, which may reject messages as offensive or spam. The word also helps prevent search engines from associating commercial sites with pornography, which might result in unwelcome traffic. Pr0n is also sometimes spelled backwards (n0rp) to further obscure the meaning to potentially uninformed readers. It can also refer to ASCII art depicting pornographic images, or to photos of the internals of consumer and industrial hardware. Prawn, a spoof of the misspelling, has started to come into use, as well; in Grand Theft Auto: Vice City, a pornographer films his movies on "Prawn Island". Conversely, in the RPG Kingdom of Loathing, prawn, referring to a kind of crustacean, is spelled pr0n, leading to the creation of food items such as "pr0n chow mein". Also see porm.

See also

Footnotes

  1. ^ Mitchell.
  2. ^ An Explanation of l33t Speak.
  3. Mello, John P. (February 2, 2015). "Google Expands Bug Bounty Program". E-Commerce Times.
  4. "A guide to leetspeak". IONOS Digitalguide. 17 November 2021. Retrieved 2021-12-17.
  5. Huh, Ben (March 12, 2014). "10 classic memes that owned the Internet". CNN. Retrieved April 23, 2013.
  6. Lorenz, Taylor (8 April 2022). "Internet 'algospeak' is changing our language in real time, from 'nip nops' to 'le dollar bean'". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2 January 2024.
  7. "What is 'algospeak'? Inside the newest version of linguistic subterfuge". 13 April 2023. Retrieved 2 January 2024.
  8. "'Mascara,' 'Unalive,' 'Corn': What Common Social Media Algospeak Words Actually Mean". Forbes. Retrieved 2 January 2024.
  9. "From Camping to Cheese Pizza, 'Algospeak' is Taking over Social Media". Forbes. Retrieved 2 January 2024.
  10. Klug, Daniel; Steen, Ella; Yurechko, Kathryn (2022). "How Algorithm Awareness Impacts Algospeak Use on TikTok". Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022. pp. 234–237. doi:10.1145/3543873.3587355. ISBN 9781450394192. S2CID 258377709. Retrieved 2 January 2024.
  11. Nix, Naomi (20 October 2023). "Pro-Palestinian creators use secret spellings, code words to evade social media algorithms". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2 January 2024.
  12. "How pro-Palestinians are using 'Algospeak' to dodge social media scrutiny and disseminate hateful rhetoric". Fox News. 23 October 2023. Retrieved 2 January 2024.
  13. Sterling, 70.
  14. Blashki & Nichol, 80.
  15. "Username and Password Guidelines". help.pearsoncmg.com. Retrieved 2019-12-10.
  16. Gallagher, Fred; Caston, Rodney. ""MegaTokyo - [9] Speak L33t?"". MegaTokyo. Retrieved 2024-01-31.
  17. Hussie, Andrew. "==>". Homestuck. Retrieved 2024-01-31.
  18. Blashki & Nichol, 79.
  19. LeBlanc, 33.
  20. Blashki & Nichol, 81.
  21. ^ Blashki & Nichol, 83.
  22. ^ Computer Hope Dictionary.
  23. LeBlanc, 34-35.
  24. ^ Van de Velde & Meuleman.
  25. LeBlanc, 30; 32.
  26. ^ The Acronym Finder.
  27. Merriam-Webster: What Does 'Pwn' Mean? And how do you say it?
  28. Pichlmair, Martin. Pwned – 10 Tales of Appropriation in Video Games (PDF).
  29. Computer Slang (PDF). December 9, 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 9, 2008.
  30. Ludlow, Peter; Wallace, Mark (2007). The Second Life Herald. MIT Press. p. 53. ISBN 978-0-262-12294-8.
  31. LeBlanc, 32-33.
  32. Naone, Erica (November 2008). "The Flaw at the Heart of the Internet". Technology Review. Vol. 111, no. 6. pp. 62–67.
  33. Peckham, Aaron (2007). Mo' Urban Dictionary: Ridonkulous Street Slang Defined. Andrews McMeel Publishing. p. 230. ISBN 978-0-7407-6875-0.
  34. Chappell, Bill (21 May 2015). "Go Forth And Pwn For Shizzle, Word List Guardians Tell Scrabble Players". NPR. Retrieved 2020-07-05.

References

Further reading

External links

Internet slang variants
Internet slang
Abuse Map of the Internet
Chatspeak
Imageboard
Memes
Usenet
Categories: