Misplaced Pages

Talk:Azerbaijan: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:57, 19 May 2011 editChipmunkdavis (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers66,790 edits Map (again): Do you get the point?← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:16, 10 January 2025 edit undoRemsense (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Template editors61,143 edits Reverting edit(s) by 2601:283:4D00:3CA0:2DA2:163E:462B:BB11 (talk) to rev. 1264780143 by Lowercase sigmabot III: Vandalism (UV 0.1.6)Tags: Ultraviolet Undo 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|search=y}}
{{GA nominee|09:59, 18 May 2011 (UTC)|nominator=] (])|page=1|subtopic=Places|status=|note=}}
{{controversial}}
{{Article history
|action1=PR
|action1date=13:40, 1 October 2009
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Azerbaijan/archive1
|action1result=reviewed
|action1oldid=317269735

|action2=GAN
|action2date=10:23, 21 May 2011
|action2link=Talk:Azerbaijan/GA1
|action2result=listed
|action2oldid=430169170

|action3=PR
|action3date=17:40, 24 May 2011
|action3link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Azerbaijan/archive2
|action3result=reviewed
|action3oldid=430704542

|topic=geography
|currentstatus=GA
|otd1date=2004-08-30|otd1oldid=9035668
|otd2date=2005-05-28|otd2oldid=16335227
|otd3date=2006-05-28|otd3oldid=55529469
|otd4date=2007-05-28|otd4oldid=134183296
|otd5date=2008-05-28|otd5oldid=215501615
|otd6date=2009-05-28|otd6oldid=292814842
|otd7date=2010-05-28|otd7oldid=364748428
|otd8date=2011-05-28|otd8oldid=431307890
|otd9date=2011-10-18|otd9oldid=456212553
|otd10date=2012-05-28|otd10oldid=494712040
|otd11date=2013-05-28|otd11oldid=557155783
|otd12date=2014-05-28|otd12oldid=610528631
|otd13date=2014-10-18|otd13oldid=629963872
|otd14date=2015-05-28|otd14oldid=664382444
|otd15date=2015-10-18|otd15oldid=686002215
|otd16date=2016-05-28|otd16oldid=722138201
|otd17date=2016-10-18|otd17oldid=744977618
|otd18date=2017-10-18|otd18oldid=805912872
|otd19date=2018-10-18|otd19oldid=864652987
|otd20date=2019-10-18|otd20oldid=921877237
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Azerbaijan|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Countries}}
{{WikiProject Asia|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Caucasia|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Western Asia|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Eastern Europe|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Artsakh|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Anthropology|oral-tradition=yes}}
}}
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=a-a|style=long}}

{{Top 25 Report|Sep 27 2020}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=/Archive index |target=/Archive index
|mask=/Archive <#> |mask=/Archive <#>
|leading_zeros=0 |leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes}} |indexhere=yes
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Outline of knowledge coverage|Azerbaijan}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject_Azerbaijan|class=B|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Iran|class=B|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Western Asia|class=B|importance=top}}
{{FAOL|Esperanto|eo:Azerbajĝano}}
{{WikiProject Countries|class=B|b1=yes|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|b6=yes}}
{{WP1.0|v0.5=pass|class=B|category=Geography|WPCD=yes}}
}} }}
{{controversial}}
{{sanctions}}
{{OnThisDay|date1=2004-08-30|oldid1=9035668|date2=2005-05-28|oldid2=16335227|date3=2006-05-28|oldid3=55529469|date4=2007-05-28|oldid4=134183296|date5=2008-05-28|oldid5=215501615|date6=2009-05-28|oldid6=292814842|date7=2010-05-28|oldid7=364748428}}
{{oldpeerreview|archive=1}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K |maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 4 |counter = 8
|minthreadsleft = 5 |minthreadsleft = 5
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |minthreadstoarchive = 1
Line 29: Line 72:
|archive = Talk:Azerbaijan/Archive %(counter)d |archive = Talk:Azerbaijan/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}

__TOC__ __TOC__


== Not calling it a dictatorship is ridiculous ==
== Nagorno-Karabakh ==

I would put this ], because ] having political and territorial disputes with ] about ]. So many countries like ], ], ], ], ], ], also have dispute territories, BUT on the maps of thats countries, dispute territories are mark. At the same time, me and some users also talking about ]n map. Georgian user by nationality, don't want put ] where mark ] and ], because on the ] which put right now, not mark Nagorno-Karabakh. I change that, BUT Azerbaijani user by nationality don't want put ] with dispute territories!

Guys, it's really funny.

Chinese users haven't say NO to ] where mark ]<br>
Indian and Pakistani users haven't say NO to maps (]/]) where mark dispute ]<br>
Russian users haven't say NO to ] in Russian wiki, where ] mark like dispute by ].

So u try hide on maps of your countries dispute territories, but people know about that in all. And that like u or not, but this maps with dispute territories will be put on pages about of your countries.

] and ], is NOT special countries! It's countries with people, like in other countries, so it's wrong so you two mark its if compare with others.

] (]) 06:30, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
:Is there anywhere a global discussion on this? --]]] 19:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
::It's wrong so u Azerbaijani users hide it, like afraid show political problems in your country, or like elevate your country to the rest of World. On the map must be shown dispute territories so people have to know where is it. Maybe it's funny but some people don't know geography in generally, and they may think so Nagorno-Karabakh to north from Baku, or to west, to south, or maybe it's in Baku.
::Yes, we have know global discussion, but I think it's not for longer. ] (]) 20:13, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

As you was told on Georgia talk, a general rule about such territories is needed. --] (]) 20:47, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

:EGroup has made a post ]. If anyone wants to follow this up, I suggest they take discussion there. ] (]) 03:37, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

We cannot have a "general rule" on this, because each case is unique and needs to be treated on its own merit. It's a careful deliberation of both the de facto and the de jure status of these territories.

As far as I understand, this is probably closest to the case of ], and so I would support that however we treat this, the two cases should be treated more or less consistently.

Note, btw, how the ] infobox has no locator map, but an overview map of Moldavia. I am not a big fan of locator maps, and I used to prefer infoboxes that show a simple overview map. These locator maps basically tell the reader "we assume that you are a clueless American high school student, so we'll begin by showing you where on the globe you can find the country you just looked up." Our readers on average aren't really that stupid or uninformed, and I assume that these famous locator maps do very little towards improving the value of our articles. --] <small>]</small> 10:34, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

ah yes, so the article on the modern Republic is at ], and it does have a locator map. So much the worse for me and my preferences.
This locator map even makes an effort at displaying Transnistria in light green, and fails completely, the light green literally not even showing up a s a single pixel in the thumbnail, which shows two things,
*the futility of drawing locator maps for small countries that show them on a map of the entire globe (why not break down and locate Moldova on a map of the solar system?)
*the futility of trying to heap details on political disputes on thumbnailed locator maps (why not break down and show the location of each individual secessionist in each country as a small moving dot, commuting to work each morning?)
and in addition how the two problems exacerbate each other if they happen to coincide in a single map. --] <small>]</small> 10:40, 15 April 2011 (UTC)


The previous discussion about listing it as a dictatorship lists a point about Russia not being listed as a dictatorship. Well now that has changed, and Misplaced Pages has agreed Russia is under an authoritarian dictatorship. I guess the war changed their minds. So why not Azerbaijan, who itself is committing an aggressive conflict which amounts to ethnic genocide against Armenians? You can find sources clearly agreeing it is a dictatorship. Here are a few: https://www.aei.org/op-eds/azerbaijans-aliyev-is-a-strategic-liability-not-an-asset/, https://hyperallergic.com/615519/artwashing-a-dictatorship/, https://evnreport.com/politics/the-dictator-has-no-clothes-aliyevs-regime-and-its-declining-oil-revenues/. Freedom House basically defines it as a dictatorship without strictly saying the dirty word: https://freedomhouse.org/country/azerbaijan. We must put the truth on here. ] (]) 18:40, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
== Nowrooz is originally from Iran ==
:The article's lead already mentions "authoritarian leadership under the leadership of both Heydar Aliyev and his son Ilham Aliyev". While a strong case for the authoritarian nature of current Azerbaijani government can be made, going into further details would violate ] and ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 22:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
:{{re|Golden}} The concern in the discussion you cited appears to be that news articles were used which didn't call it a dictatorship. Thus I cited an academic source, a in ''Global Politics and Strategy'', which directly calls it a hereditary dictatorship akin to the Kim dynasty. ] (]) 16:14, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
::Lack of sources isn't a concern. Infoboxes reflect {{tq|the official form of government, not what outside observers (no matter whether rightly or wrongly) think it is}}, as stated by a participant in that discussion. For further clarification on the usage of the parameter, please refer to the ]. — ] <sup>]</sup> 16:43, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
:::I disagree with that editor and the template documentation makes no such claim. Large-scale discussions on pages like ] and ] have supported my interpretation of the purpose of the infobox. Misplaced Pages articles follow reliable, secondary sources in all cases. This infobox, as with all others, summarizes the body content that is sourced to reliable, independent, secondary sources. Sources are the only concern on Misplaced Pages. Semi-presidential republic is the official line, but it is false as considered by academics due to election fraud, suppression of the opposition, and hereditary succession. I have referred to the template documentation; all it says for that parameter is <code><nowiki>|government_type = <!--Wikilinked if link exists--></nowiki></code>, so it does not support your assertion. You are required by Misplaced Pages policy to make your argument based on reliable, secondary sources. ] (]) 17:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
::::There should be consistency throughout all articles. If nations like Russia and North Korea are listed as dictatorships, then this article needs to be included in the same category. After all, it's simple to find sources that characterize Azerbaijan as a dictatorship. I stress again, though, that consistency is essential, and ''all'' other nation articles whose constitutional systems of governance are inconsistent with ''de jure'' should also receive the necessary adjustments. And there are many of such. - ] (]) 02:47, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
:::::When it comes to the infobox, the government should be as it is, "Unitary semi-presidential republic". The authoritarian nature is already included in the ]. Sham elections are there, but in North Korea even sham elections are not conducted, as its leader is unelected by principle. ]<sup>]</sup> 08:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
::::::North Korea conducts elections a couple of times each decade, and North Korea is led by the elected leader of its ruling political party. ] (]) 09:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
:::::::The NK elections are internal rather than ], as pretended in some post-Soviet ]. Also, if I'm not mistaken, both Kim Jong Il and Kim Jong Un became leaders by hereditary proclamation rather than internal party elections. ]<sup>]</sup> 09:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
::::::::The elections are by direct popular vote for the legislature. Kim Jong Un won an internal party election in 2012, a few months after his father's death. ] (]) 11:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::The point is that NK's most important office, the ] (equivalent to president in post-Soviet states), is not elected through direct popular vote in principle. Changing that is much less likely and harder than transforming sham elections of a president elsewhere into fair and transparent. ]<sup>]</sup> 12:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
::::::::::Neither is Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, that's not a point of inconsistency regarding the treatment of one pseudodemocracy or another. ] (]) 12:56, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::::That's a red herring. Anyway, for the purpose of infobox there are ] issues when adding "dictatorship" to certain countries. The country infobox template had ] earlier and it appears that in some cases it's better to stick just to country's constitution, leaving details to article's body. ]<sup>]</sup> 13:48, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
::::::::::::We as editors cannot cite a primary source like a country's constitution or our own interpretations of one. We are bound by our policies to follow what political scientists say. NPOV means neutral with respect to what the political scientists say, it does not mean including the regime's point of view. I would check out ] and the many similar conversations in the archives. ] (]) 13:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Major reference works, such as '']'', ''Oxford Guide to Countries of the World'' or ''Britannica'', list constitutionally defined government models in country profiles (which are equivalents of our country infoboxes). I'm not a fan of current power abuse in Azerbaijan or Russia, but per ] a country infobox should be succinct. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
::::::::::::It is a direct address to the point that was made, the opposite of a red herring. LouisAragon brought up an important point about consistency, and the apparent difference about sham elections applies to both examples LouisAragon raised, as well as this article. ] (]) 13:57, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::::::When it comes to infobox, I oppose per my rationale above, <s>elsewhere in the article I'm ok with LouisAragon's proposal.</s> ]<sup>]</sup> 16:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
::::::::::::::LouisAragon has not proposed anything for unstated other parts of the article, they referred directly to the infoboxes at ] and ]. ] (]) 16:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::Ok, my oppose for Azerbaijan stands then. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::::::I agree that there are sufficient citations to use dictatorship, especially compared to other country articles that are currently named as dictatorships. ] (]) 22:21, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
::::::::::::::I have not reached EC status, and I agree that other countries under similar conditions have been classified as authoritarian dictatorships. ] (]) 04:55, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
:This article is about a country. Before imposing your personal view to this article, please proove that your sources are independent and reliable organisations. I recall international NGOs reporting Armenia's ethnic-cleansing activities in Karabakh in 1990s when Russian forces cooperated with Armenian proxies in Khojaly operation. But Armenia is still enjoying the white list. ] (]) 18:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)


== Aq Qoyunlu Qara Qoyunlu ==
It is interesting that Nowrooz is mentioned here as a azari celebrating, while it is originally from Iran and all of azarbayjan has Iranian culture as it belonged to Iran and was seprated by russia by force!! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


According to the German Turkologist Gerhard Doerfer, it is very strange that the word "Turkman" still confuses Ag Goyunlu and Gara Goyunlu Turkmens. The word Turkman actually means "nomadic Oghuz"Aggoyunlu and Karagoyunlu "Turkmen" are Azerbaijanis anyway. ] (]) 15:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)


:Some scientists call them Turkoman while others Turkmen. No difference, as both phrases refer to post-islamic Oghuz peoples, like modern Turkish, Azerbaijani, Turkmen.
:Ak-koyunlu, Kara-koyunlu, Kayi, Kinik, Bayandur and many other names refer to Turkic tribes. ] (]) 18:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC)


== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 August 2024 ==
== Northern Iran ==


{{Edit extended-protected|Azerbaijan|answered=yes}}
Since a huge number of Iranian population are Azeri (Including me!) and those people are genetically related to other Iranic Peoples, I think the term "Northern Iran" is both historically and logically more accurate.
Description: This page contains a spelling mistake, where it writes "... UAV'S/unmanned aerial vehicle..".
Point of Error: UAV'S/unmanned aerial vehicle
Correction Suggestion: UAVs / unmanned aerial vehicles ] (]) 20:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:EEp --> ⸺(])] 02:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)


== The combination of the name Azerbaijan ==
== Locator map ==


Origin of the name Azerbaijan (Azerbaijan):
] isn't intended as a locator map of Azerbaijan. It is intended to illustrate which portion of Azerbaijan is in Europe.
By summarizing the opinions of different people given below, the origin of the name of Azerbaijan is as follows:
As such, it may have applications at ] or at ], but it is hardly useful as a generic locator map in this article's infobox. --] <small>]</small> 10:41, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Az - As (from the ancient tribes of the Turks)
Er - Er (gentleman)
Bye-bye (big)
Jan-Gan (one of the Turkish place suffixes)
In general, it means the living place of the brave and great Az


The name and origin of Azerbaijan according to different people:
== Map ==


The main map should reflect that Nagorno Karabakh is a de facto independent region, that doesn't fall under Jurisdiction of Azerbaijan. The Nagorno Karabakh portion should have a different shade of colour or be marked with border. Look at Serbia's map for an example: http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Europe-Serbia.svg ] (]) 17:12, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
:However, there is a major difference between Kosovo and the NKR: no one has had the sack to recognize the NKR. So the situations are not equivalent. --] (]) 18:11, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
::Look at Moldova's map, look closely and you see its breakaway state is shaded. If that is so, than Moldova's map should be change. Or if not, Azerbaijan's. Consistency is golden.] (]) 21:38, 7 April 2011 (UTC)


_The name and origin of Azerbaijan (Azerbaijan) according to "Mir Ali Seydev"
== New Map ==


Hello all, this map is the most appropriate map as it shows Azerbaijan in the centre of the map. There is a movement slowly in Misplaced Pages to make all country maps in this style. All countries of Caucasus will follow this style. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/dd/Azneutmap.PNG


Mir Ali Sayedov, a great Turkish scientist, considers the name of Azerbaijan to be related to mythological and religious factors and distinguishes and justifies this word.
] (]) 19:14, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Az: good intention, profit, benefit, and also the name of one of the great tribes of Turks, whose name is mentioned in the inscriptions of the Orkhon Plain, even some believe that the name of the continent of Asia is derived from the name of this tribe that was scattered in most of its parts. is The word Az is preserved in the name of an ancient village called "Has" or "As" belonging to 4 thousand years ago.
Ar: Man, human being, young man. This word is seen at the end of Turk clan names. Tatar (Tat man. Non-Muslim here), Khazar, Qajar, Magyar
In ancient Turkish, the suffix (ar) was attached to the end of the name and assigned a person to it. The same suffix that is equivalent to (li) or (lu) in modern Turkish.
Az is also the name of the people who lived in present-day Azerbaijan and eastern Turkey and ruled there. The word comes from +ar (Azar) or today's "Azer".
The combination of the two words Az and Ar means "Azar" meaning a well-intentioned man and figuratively meaning a blessed tribe. This word continues to exist in another way in the name of the historical river of the Azerbaijan region, "Araz". In the rural areas of Ahar, this word is pronounced "Araz".
Bai: The word Bai in Turkish language means big, rich, owner, lord, mighty, rich, powerful, powerful, wealthy, ruler, wise, etc.
Gan (Qan): father, khan, king, lord and similar meanings
The Turkic suffix "jan", "-ghan-", "-ghan-", "-gan-", "-kahn-" indicates places, places and geographical locations. For example, in the case of Chalagan (the name of an island in Lake Urmia), it means the place of residence of the Chala clan. Some other examples of the use of this suffix: Varzeghan, Gogan, Gorgan, Taleghan, Zangan (modern Zanjan), Sirjan, Kamijan, etc., which this suffix has changed to J
Saidef means this word in its general sense as "blessed wealthy father". Most of Turk researchers agree with this theory, and every day they get a lot of evidence to prove this claim.


:I will place the new map that shows Azerbaijan in centre. The other Caucasian countries are following suits. If you have any glaring objections make yourself heard and we can discuss it. ] (]) 02:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
::What other "movements" are you talking about? You give no argument at all to change the map like this and you must reach consensus before making a major change like this.] (]) 10:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
:::Also stop vandalizing this page with ] (]) 10:41, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
::::I believe he is speaking about keeping consistency on wikipedia. The countries of the South Cacasus are in the same geographic region and therefore it only seems proper that they maps should reflect the region better rather than attemping to show them as part of Europe. Which as you can see, puts Azerbaijan in the far bottom right corner.--] (]) 02:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
:::::At least four editors have done reverts over the past 10 days, including me, to return to an old locator map with the country-in-question somewhere near the center, not on the extreme edge as prefered by twice-banned (in part for violating ] ] (he/she has recently blanked his/her user talk page). If other editors prefer a different map, make that suggestion here; However, please note that you will find that unless it has the country-in-question somewhere near the middle, it will not meet acceptance nor meet the wide consensus of WP editors regarding country locator maps.] (]) 16:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)


_The name and origin of Azerbaijan according to "Ismail Hadi"
User: ComtesseDeMingrelie has wasted a lot of man hours around here, and we really need to learn to be less forgiving and lenient in such cases. If somebody clearly isn't here to write an encyclopedia, we can just tell them to go away. We are still held to apply and assume good faith with people who struggle with making a useful encyclopedic suggestion, but people who are clearly just gaming the system aren't worth our time. --] <small>]</small> 10:04, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
::The current (orthographic projection) map is the best and most neutral version. Its also the standard map on other countries. So lets just stick with that one and be done with the discussion. ] (]) 13:52, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
:::Agreed; the current (orthographic projection) map has the key ingredients....the country-in-question somewhere near the middle, and it's not a map of Europe...i.e., not a barely-disguised attempt ] to say that Azer. is "in Europe" ] (]) 14:45, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
:::: Except Azerbaijan is not coloured on the world view map. I don't understand what the issue people had with the previous map, you really have to see the whole world to point out Azerbaijan? ] (]) 02:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
::::: I think the inset is good enough at showing the country in color. I agree with your second point regarding scale, but the inset helps on that, and after so much past contention before reaching consensus on this map, shouldn't everyone hesitate before changing it (again)? (as ] says above. ) Consensus is clear that the locator map must have the country somewhat near the middle, meaning, for Caucasus countries, it cannot be a map of Europe (or a map of Asia)...the current map is ok on that. ] (]) 16:55, 20 April 2011 (UTC)


The information panel map is confusing. The zoomed inset is placed in the top right hand corner of the field and coincidentally has maritime borders similar to those of Eastern Russia, so Azerbaijan appears to slot perfectly into Russia's Pacific Coast where Vladivostok is. Perhaps a smaller inset could be placed nearby, so as not to create confusion as to the actual location of Azerbaijan. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:25, 14 May 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


Az/AS+R+By+Jan
== Changes ==
Az/As: It is the name of a people who lived all over Asia, and probably the name of the continent of Asia is also derived from the name of this people.
Ar: It means brave person or person
The name of Aras River (Araz) is also composed of two words Ar+Az
Bai: Amir, Ghani, Sharif
Jan: a place suffix that can be seen in the names of cities such as Baylakhan, Gogan, and Zanjan (Zangan).
Therefore, the meaning of the word "Azerbaijan" is: the habitat of the As, the home of the noble people of As, the habitat of the As people.


I made some changes. Added sources, merged lose sentences, removed images as they were sandwiching the text, merged the subheadlines of modern era into one. Also removed repeating Guba mass graves and unrelated text. ] (]) 22:50, 12 May 2011 (UTC)


_The name and origin of Azerbaijan according to Professor "Zahtabi"
== Khanates map ==


As a good faith change, I replaced the Azerbaijani khanates map with a compleet version. The current map didnt show all of the Azerbaijani khanates. I also added a source backing the change. ] (]) 20:25, 16 May 2011 (UTC)


The word "Azerbaijan" is "Atropateena" in Greek, "Atropatekan" in Armenian, and "Azerbaygan" in Persian.
== Map (again) ==
Atropat was the name of one of the famous generals of Azerbaijan. According to Professor Zahtabi, the word "atropate" can be broken down in the following way
At (Od) + Ver-er (hero, brave) + Pot (protector) (here fire protector)
Atropateen: (Land of the Fire Guardians)
So the root of the word "Atropathan" is as follows:
Od + Er + Pat + An (plural suffix borrowed from Turkish to Persian and Armenian): It means the land of fire protectors. After the conquest of the Arabs, Atropaten has become "Azerbaijan".


Given that other similar countries are enacting this format in map, Azerbaijan must also. Meaning, it must show the Nagorno-Karabkah region in light green and the rest of Az. in the dark green. This will show that NKR is not under the control of the Az. Government and is de-facto independent but not de-jure. Check the Georgia, Serbia, and Moldova maps for how this format has been implemented. I recommend this be done quickly for Azerbaijan as well. ] (]) 05:58, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
:Had you bothered to check out the talkpage, you would have seen that we have already discussed this. Every country is a different, separatist states in Serbia, Georgia, etc are recognized by at least one UN country. That doesnt apply to NK. Besides the map is wrong, Naxcivan is not even shown. So your POV pushing is unacceptable. ] (]) 08:59, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
::What? So recognition by one UN country makes it appropriate to show the territory? First off, the reason that this territory is being shown, is not because of recognition, but because the territory is not under the control of the Azeri government, it is de-facto independent. Thus it should be shown in an appropriate manner. Plus, Moldova shows its breakaway territory, and its territory is not recognised by any UN country. Not showing Karabakh is POV pushing as it goes against an accepted format in Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 16:57, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
:::Again the map does not even show ], this map is wrong. we have already reached a consensus on the map, including from 3rd parties. It was brought forward three times. I told you this yet you continue to insist on it. ] (]) 09:17, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
::::Consensus can change, this is hardly an unbearable insistence by MosMusy. There's no strong consensus for anything anywhere. Anyway, Nakhchivan is an easily fixable issue. ] (]) 09:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
:::::'''Note''': MosMusy is a sock of ] and he tried to push his POV map earlier. is the investigation. He worked his way from Moldova's and neighboring and map to here. Every country is different, Azerbaijan is not Moldova nor is it Georgia. The territorial integrity and sovereignty of Azerbajian over Karabakh is recognized by every country in the world. ] (]) 10:18, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
::::::It appears instead that Mov25 is/was a sock of MosMusy. Anyway, as long as there's no more stopping that's fine. And when did he do anything on Moldova? (who's territorial integrity etc etc is just as recognised) ] (]) 10:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


_The name and origin of Azerbaijan according to professor "Parviz Yakani Zare"
It does not matter what he did to Moldova or other countries. Let Moldova editors correct it or go correct the Moldova page. Azerbaijan’s territorial intergrity and whole territory is recognized by the world as shown in the map. Look at every map from CIA, UN, other international organizations. All have one map with no separatism country in it. So, Misplaced Pages bases everything on reliable sources.
Neftchi, thank you for what you provided (the sockpuppet case):
 
Can the person who makes so many nationalism edits (look at the links in the sockpuppet investigation case) be accepted as good faith editor? It is obviously for inserting POV maps and texts. The map is basing on the sources by all international community and there should be no shades, no other colors. ] (]) 14:23, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


:]. You do realise of course that all those organisations you mention do not follow the ] policy, which is one of the pillars of wikipedia. They play politics, we should not. We have reliable sources that Azerbaijan has no control over most of the claimed Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, so sourcing is not an issue. ] (]) 15:55, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


Professor Parviz Yakani Zare, a well-known historian, says the following about the name of Azerbaijan: The word Azerbaijan originally comes from "Hazar Baygan" composed of "Haaz+Ar+Bay+Gan or Arabized Qan means John".
I am sorry but read again my comment. I AM commenting on content. And do you know how funny your comment sounds?! You say international organizations like UN, OSCE, EU and CIA "play politics" and you as a Misplaced Pages editor does not play politics? :-) please. Also Azerbaijan is not friendly with every country and not every country depends on Azerbaijan to "play politics" but still all recognize Azerbaijan's territorial integrity. The territory is recognized territory of Azerbaijan. That's it and it must be shown like that. ] (]) 16:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
"Haaz or Haas" is the name of a tribe of ancient Turks and it is mentioned as "Orkhon Yeni Sei" in the old writings. Some researchers, including "Barthold", consider it probable that the Haaz are related to the "Turuk" tribes, who are introduced by Assyrian inscriptions from 1400 BC as the inhabitants around Urmi Lake. Also, Haaz in Turkish means Ughur and good intention
:Misplaced Pages editors are not meant to play politics. Hence ]. And yes, you commented on content, but you also said that it was great someone provided a sockpuppet case. It was not, such things are irrelevant unless the user is banned or under some sort of editing restriction; Mosmusy is not. The friendliness of Azerbaijan is again completely irrelevant, as is other countries recognition of Azerbaijan. Far be it from me to make sweeping statements like "That's it and it must be shown like that", but if I did I'd say something like "Azerbaijan does not control the territory. That's it, and it must be shown like that". Of course, that would also be wrong, as it would require completely removing it from the green, the NKR POV. ] (]) 16:10, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
"R" is of Turkish origin and means human. This word is attached to other words as a suffix and creates the name of tribes. Such as: (Avar-Khazar or Khazar-Magyar or Magyar-Qajar or Qajar and...). Hazar means a people and a tribe, which later became "Azer" with slight changes in Persian and Arabic. Because the person Zarathustra (in Turkish means the one who fully understands) and his mother "Daghdo" (in Turkish means the one who gives birth) and their god "Ahar Majda" (in Turkish means the highest and highest human spirit) belong to the culture and people of Turks. have been in the region and according to the sanctity of fire in Zoroastrian religion, later this word was known to be related to fire among the Persians, which is not very true, although the sun and fire are very respected in the Turkan Sakha rituals. And they were known as the saviors of mankind, because it was with the help of light and fire that the Turks were able to burn the iron barrier that Zulqarnain had built against them and enter this world.
:The current map of Azerbaijan is misleading, as it portrays Azerbaijan as having control over the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh. Nagorno Karabakh is '''de-facto''' independent and thus it deserves to be highlighted within Azerbaijan's borders as every other country has followed this suit. This is a consensus reached at Misplaced Pages, and all we are doing is applying it where it is needed. A map needs to portray to current reality of the region and country, having Karabakh not highlighted shows that Azeri Government has that territory under its control, which is not true. (and stop making personal attacks against me, rather focus on the content on hand). Note: I never pushed this change for Georgia or Moldova maps. ] (]) 16:11, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
"Bay" or "Bay" or "Big, Beyk" means rich, wealthy, chief, tribe, ruler, etc. On the other hand, "Baymaq" in Turkish means development and progress.
"Gan" in the Turkish language has changed to "Qan" (and in the Arabic language to John) by accepting phonetic changes and has many meanings such as father, Khaqan, etc., and "Qan" in Turkish is a passive sign with emphasis and exaggeration. It is (Chalishkhan) and Baiqan means development of Yaf ] (]) 19:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC)


:And what do you propose to change or add exactly? ] (]) 08:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Chipmunkdavis, my note of status of Azerbaijan's friendliness is relevant. You said international organizations "play politics". ok, I understand America can play politics, Turkey can play politics, Georgia can play politics because of Azerbaijani oil, but what about Vanuatu? Kenya? Zimbabwe? Uruguay? Any country which is not dependent on Azerbaijan. Why are they not recognizing. That's why your note is irrelevant. What is controlled by Karabakh Armenians or Armenian Republic is not relevant. Where is the proof they control what is colored? Did you personally go an measure every meter of Karabakh? Or are you basing your note on some maps produced by Armenian agencies, Azeri agencies and others? Why are they more reliable than the international organizations or presidents and parliaments of countries? Misplaced Pages is based on sources. All sources say it is Azerbaijan.
MosMusy, I do not make personal attacks. I see the sockpuppet report and it shows your actions, your attacks on strikes, not mine. ] (]) 16:56, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


== Religion in Azerbaijan ==
:Chipmunkdavis, your argument does not hold. If we go with your logic, we must replace the map of the United States with one indicating ]. How about replacing the map of Spain with shaded areas of ]? how about replacing the map of ] with one where Kurdistan is missing or is shaded? Or what about Turkish Cyprus in ]? The list goes on and on. Do you get the point? ] (]) 18:28, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


The ] and ] pages have quite contradictory claims. I think to make a proper claim, these two have to be adjusted, as well as the statistics on this page.
::First off, you cannot compare ] with ] and doing so is silly. Second, Lakotah is under the full control of US. Same with Basque being under Spain's control, even though there are people who don't want that there, it still doesn't take away from the fact that Basque is fully under Spain's control. Azerbaijan doesn't control Nagorno-Karabakh and certain surrounding regions, and it never has since the end of the Karabakh war. Why else does Azerbaijan constantly threaten to take back the territory by force? If they are under control of it they would not have to make those threats. This region is de-facto independent. The map should show that clearly. A map is not a POV, but a unbiased reference of the region at hand. Showing that Azerbaijan covering Karabakh is not factually correct, as at the present time this region is not under Azerbaijan's control. That's all it is showing, it is still showing it within Azerbaijan's borders (de-jure), the only difference being a lighter shade of green which shows the de-facto independent nature of the region.. If Cyprus map doesn't show it, it will as well since this is being applied to all main maps in wikipedia. ] (]) 21:14, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


From my understanding: although culturally muslim, the large population doesn't believe in religion or practice. Hence, the religion section has to be altered. ] (]) 11:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
:::Any country can play politics. Vanuatu as much as any other country. We have sources saying it is not under the control of Azerbaijan. So "All sources say it is Azerbaijan" is completely untrue. As for my logic, it holds. The republic of Lakotah has no actual control over the territory it claims. Spain exerts control over the Basque area. Neither the government of the Basque area nor the government of Kurdistan has declared independence anyway. Turkish Cyprus in Cyprus would make sense though, as they have declared independence, and Cyprus has no control over that territory. Do you get the point? ] (]) 02:56, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:16, 10 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Azerbaijan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Good articleAzerbaijan has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 1, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
May 21, 2011Good article nomineeListed
May 24, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 30, 2004, May 28, 2005, May 28, 2006, May 28, 2007, May 28, 2008, May 28, 2009, May 28, 2010, May 28, 2011, October 18, 2011, May 28, 2012, May 28, 2013, May 28, 2014, October 18, 2014, May 28, 2015, October 18, 2015, May 28, 2016, October 18, 2016, October 18, 2017, October 18, 2018, and October 18, 2019.
Current status: Good article
This  level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconAzerbaijan Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijanWikiProject icon
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCountries
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry
WikiProject Countries to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconAsia Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCaucasia (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Caucasia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CaucasiaWikipedia:WikiProject CaucasiaTemplate:WikiProject CaucasiaCaucasia
WikiProject iconWestern Asia Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEastern Europe (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Eastern Europe, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Eastern EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern EuropeTemplate:WikiProject Eastern EuropeEastern Europe
WikiProject iconArtsakh Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconAzerbaijan is within the scope of WikiProject Artsakh, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Artsakh and Artsakhians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArtsakhWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsakhTemplate:WikiProject ArtsakhArtsakh
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAnthropology: Oral tradition
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
???This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:


Not calling it a dictatorship is ridiculous

The previous discussion about listing it as a dictatorship lists a point about Russia not being listed as a dictatorship. Well now that has changed, and Misplaced Pages has agreed Russia is under an authoritarian dictatorship. I guess the war changed their minds. So why not Azerbaijan, who itself is committing an aggressive conflict which amounts to ethnic genocide against Armenians? You can find sources clearly agreeing it is a dictatorship. Here are a few: https://www.aei.org/op-eds/azerbaijans-aliyev-is-a-strategic-liability-not-an-asset/, https://hyperallergic.com/615519/artwashing-a-dictatorship/, https://evnreport.com/politics/the-dictator-has-no-clothes-aliyevs-regime-and-its-declining-oil-revenues/. Freedom House basically defines it as a dictatorship without strictly saying the dirty word: https://freedomhouse.org/country/azerbaijan. We must put the truth on here. Evil Narwhal (talk) 18:40, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

The article's lead already mentions "authoritarian leadership under the leadership of both Heydar Aliyev and his son Ilham Aliyev". While a strong case for the authoritarian nature of current Azerbaijani government can be made, going into further details would violate WP:NPOV and WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. Brandmeister 22:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
@Golden: The concern in the discussion you cited appears to be that news articles were used which didn't call it a dictatorship. Thus I cited an academic source, a journal article in Global Politics and Strategy, which directly calls it a hereditary dictatorship akin to the Kim dynasty. 25stargeneral (talk) 16:14, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Lack of sources isn't a concern. Infoboxes reflect the official form of government, not what outside observers (no matter whether rightly or wrongly) think it is, as stated by a participant in that discussion. For further clarification on the usage of the parameter, please refer to the the template's documentation. — Golden 16:43, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
I disagree with that editor and the template documentation makes no such claim. Large-scale discussions on pages like Talk:Russia and Talk:North Korea have supported my interpretation of the purpose of the infobox. Misplaced Pages articles follow reliable, secondary sources in all cases. This infobox, as with all others, summarizes the body content that is sourced to reliable, independent, secondary sources. Sources are the only concern on Misplaced Pages. Semi-presidential republic is the official line, but it is false as considered by academics due to election fraud, suppression of the opposition, and hereditary succession. I have referred to the template documentation; all it says for that parameter is |government_type = <!--Wikilinked if link exists-->, so it does not support your assertion. You are required by Misplaced Pages policy to make your argument based on reliable, secondary sources. 25stargeneral (talk) 17:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
There should be consistency throughout all articles. If nations like Russia and North Korea are listed as dictatorships, then this article needs to be included in the same category. After all, it's simple to find sources that characterize Azerbaijan as a dictatorship. I stress again, though, that consistency is essential, and all other nation articles whose constitutional systems of governance are inconsistent with de jure should also receive the necessary adjustments. And there are many of such. - LouisAragon (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
When it comes to the infobox, the government should be as it is, "Unitary semi-presidential republic". The authoritarian nature is already included in the government and politics section. Sham elections are there, but in North Korea even sham elections are not conducted, as its leader is unelected by principle. Brandmeister 08:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
North Korea conducts elections a couple of times each decade, and North Korea is led by the elected leader of its ruling political party. CMD (talk) 09:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
The NK elections are internal rather than direct, by popular vote, as pretended in some post-Soviet pseudodemocracies. Also, if I'm not mistaken, both Kim Jong Il and Kim Jong Un became leaders by hereditary proclamation rather than internal party elections. Brandmeister 09:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
The elections are by direct popular vote for the legislature. Kim Jong Un won an internal party election in 2012, a few months after his father's death. CMD (talk) 11:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
The point is that NK's most important office, the General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea (equivalent to president in post-Soviet states), is not elected through direct popular vote in principle. Changing that is much less likely and harder than transforming sham elections of a president elsewhere into fair and transparent. Brandmeister 12:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Neither is Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, that's not a point of inconsistency regarding the treatment of one pseudodemocracy or another. CMD (talk) 12:56, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
That's a red herring. Anyway, for the purpose of infobox there are WP:NPOV issues when adding "dictatorship" to certain countries. The country infobox template had a related discussion earlier and it appears that in some cases it's better to stick just to country's constitution, leaving details to article's body. Brandmeister 13:48, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
We as editors cannot cite a primary source like a country's constitution or our own interpretations of one. We are bound by our policies to follow what political scientists say. NPOV means neutral with respect to what the political scientists say, it does not mean including the regime's point of view. I would check out Talk:Russia#Constitutional form of government or de facto system of government and the many similar conversations in the archives. 25stargeneral (talk) 13:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Major reference works, such as The World Factbook, Oxford Guide to Countries of the World or Britannica, list constitutionally defined government models in country profiles (which are equivalents of our country infoboxes). I'm not a fan of current power abuse in Azerbaijan or Russia, but per MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE a country infobox should be succinct. Brandmeister 16:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
It is a direct address to the point that was made, the opposite of a red herring. LouisAragon brought up an important point about consistency, and the apparent difference about sham elections applies to both examples LouisAragon raised, as well as this article. CMD (talk) 13:57, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
When it comes to infobox, I oppose per my rationale above, elsewhere in the article I'm ok with LouisAragon's proposal. Brandmeister 16:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
LouisAragon has not proposed anything for unstated other parts of the article, they referred directly to the infoboxes at Russia and North Korea. CMD (talk) 16:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Ok, my oppose for Azerbaijan stands then. Brandmeister 17:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
I agree that there are sufficient citations to use dictatorship, especially compared to other country articles that are currently named as dictatorships. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 22:21, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
I have not reached EC status, and I agree that other countries under similar conditions have been classified as authoritarian dictatorships. TheRichCapitalist (talk) 04:55, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
This article is about a country. Before imposing your personal view to this article, please proove that your sources are independent and reliable organisations. I recall international NGOs reporting Armenia's ethnic-cleansing activities in Karabakh in 1990s when Russian forces cooperated with Armenian proxies in Khojaly operation. But Armenia is still enjoying the white list. Iron Archer (talk) 18:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Aq Qoyunlu Qara Qoyunlu

According to the German Turkologist Gerhard Doerfer, it is very strange that the word "Turkman" still confuses Ag Goyunlu and Gara Goyunlu Turkmens. The word Turkman actually means "nomadic Oghuz"Aggoyunlu and Karagoyunlu "Turkmen" are Azerbaijanis anyway. 5.191.113.222 (talk) 15:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Some scientists call them Turkoman while others Turkmen. No difference, as both phrases refer to post-islamic Oghuz peoples, like modern Turkish, Azerbaijani, Turkmen.
Ak-koyunlu, Kara-koyunlu, Kayi, Kinik, Bayandur and many other names refer to Turkic tribes. Iron Archer (talk) 18:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 August 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Description: This page contains a spelling mistake, where it writes "... UAV'S/unmanned aerial vehicle..". Point of Error: UAV'S/unmanned aerial vehicle Correction Suggestion: UAVs / unmanned aerial vehicles Farial Mahmod (talk) 20:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done ⸺(Random)staplers 02:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

The combination of the name Azerbaijan

Origin of the name Azerbaijan (Azerbaijan): By summarizing the opinions of different people given below, the origin of the name of Azerbaijan is as follows: Az - As (from the ancient tribes of the Turks) Er - Er (gentleman) Bye-bye (big) Jan-Gan (one of the Turkish place suffixes) In general, it means the living place of the brave and great Az

The name and origin of Azerbaijan according to different people:


_The name and origin of Azerbaijan (Azerbaijan) according to "Mir Ali Seydev"


Mir Ali Sayedov, a great Turkish scientist, considers the name of Azerbaijan to be related to mythological and religious factors and distinguishes and justifies this word. Az: good intention, profit, benefit, and also the name of one of the great tribes of Turks, whose name is mentioned in the inscriptions of the Orkhon Plain, even some believe that the name of the continent of Asia is derived from the name of this tribe that was scattered in most of its parts. is The word Az is preserved in the name of an ancient village called "Has" or "As" belonging to 4 thousand years ago. Ar: Man, human being, young man. This word is seen at the end of Turk clan names. Tatar (Tat man. Non-Muslim here), Khazar, Qajar, Magyar In ancient Turkish, the suffix (ar) was attached to the end of the name and assigned a person to it. The same suffix that is equivalent to (li) or (lu) in modern Turkish. Az is also the name of the people who lived in present-day Azerbaijan and eastern Turkey and ruled there. The word comes from +ar (Azar) or today's "Azer". The combination of the two words Az and Ar means "Azar" meaning a well-intentioned man and figuratively meaning a blessed tribe. This word continues to exist in another way in the name of the historical river of the Azerbaijan region, "Araz". In the rural areas of Ahar, this word is pronounced "Araz". Bai: The word Bai in Turkish language means big, rich, owner, lord, mighty, rich, powerful, powerful, wealthy, ruler, wise, etc. Gan (Qan): father, khan, king, lord and similar meanings The Turkic suffix "jan", "-ghan-", "-ghan-", "-gan-", "-kahn-" indicates places, places and geographical locations. For example, in the case of Chalagan (the name of an island in Lake Urmia), it means the place of residence of the Chala clan. Some other examples of the use of this suffix: Varzeghan, Gogan, Gorgan, Taleghan, Zangan (modern Zanjan), Sirjan, Kamijan, etc., which this suffix has changed to J Saidef means this word in its general sense as "blessed wealthy father". Most of Turk researchers agree with this theory, and every day they get a lot of evidence to prove this claim.


_The name and origin of Azerbaijan according to "Ismail Hadi"


Az/AS+R+By+Jan Az/As: It is the name of a people who lived all over Asia, and probably the name of the continent of Asia is also derived from the name of this people. Ar: It means brave person or person The name of Aras River (Araz) is also composed of two words Ar+Az Bai: Amir, Ghani, Sharif Jan: a place suffix that can be seen in the names of cities such as Baylakhan, Gogan, and Zanjan (Zangan). Therefore, the meaning of the word "Azerbaijan" is: the habitat of the As, the home of the noble people of As, the habitat of the As people.


_The name and origin of Azerbaijan according to Professor "Zahtabi"


The word "Azerbaijan" is "Atropateena" in Greek, "Atropatekan" in Armenian, and "Azerbaygan" in Persian. Atropat was the name of one of the famous generals of Azerbaijan. According to Professor Zahtabi, the word "atropate" can be broken down in the following way At (Od) + Ver-er (hero, brave) + Pot (protector) (here fire protector) Atropateen: (Land of the Fire Guardians) So the root of the word "Atropathan" is as follows: Od + Er + Pat + An (plural suffix borrowed from Turkish to Persian and Armenian): It means the land of fire protectors. After the conquest of the Arabs, Atropaten has become "Azerbaijan".


_The name and origin of Azerbaijan according to professor "Parviz Yakani Zare"


Professor Parviz Yakani Zare, a well-known historian, says the following about the name of Azerbaijan: The word Azerbaijan originally comes from "Hazar Baygan" composed of "Haaz+Ar+Bay+Gan or Arabized Qan means John". "Haaz or Haas" is the name of a tribe of ancient Turks and it is mentioned as "Orkhon Yeni Sei" in the old writings. Some researchers, including "Barthold", consider it probable that the Haaz are related to the "Turuk" tribes, who are introduced by Assyrian inscriptions from 1400 BC as the inhabitants around Urmi Lake. Also, Haaz in Turkish means Ughur and good intention "R" is of Turkish origin and means human. This word is attached to other words as a suffix and creates the name of tribes. Such as: (Avar-Khazar or Khazar-Magyar or Magyar-Qajar or Qajar and...). Hazar means a people and a tribe, which later became "Azer" with slight changes in Persian and Arabic. Because the person Zarathustra (in Turkish means the one who fully understands) and his mother "Daghdo" (in Turkish means the one who gives birth) and their god "Ahar Majda" (in Turkish means the highest and highest human spirit) belong to the culture and people of Turks. have been in the region and according to the sanctity of fire in Zoroastrian religion, later this word was known to be related to fire among the Persians, which is not very true, although the sun and fire are very respected in the Turkan Sakha rituals. And they were known as the saviors of mankind, because it was with the help of light and fire that the Turks were able to burn the iron barrier that Zulqarnain had built against them and enter this world. "Bay" or "Bay" or "Big, Beyk" means rich, wealthy, chief, tribe, ruler, etc. On the other hand, "Baymaq" in Turkish means development and progress. "Gan" in the Turkish language has changed to "Qan" (and in the Arabic language to John) by accepting phonetic changes and has many meanings such as father, Khaqan, etc., and "Qan" in Turkish is a passive sign with emphasis and exaggeration. It is (Chalishkhan) and Baiqan means development of Yaf Yashar faimi (talk) 19:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

And what do you propose to change or add exactly? Mellk (talk) 08:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Religion in Azerbaijan

The religion in Azerbaijan and irreligion in Azerbaijan pages have quite contradictory claims. I think to make a proper claim, these two have to be adjusted, as well as the statistics on this page.

From my understanding: although culturally muslim, the large population doesn't believe in religion or practice. Hence, the religion section has to be altered. DeliberationDemocracy (talk) 11:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Categories: