Misplaced Pages

User talk:Goodwinsands: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:29, 19 May 2011 editOff2riorob (talk | contribs)80,325 edits →BLPN Israel Shamir: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:30, 24 November 2015 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,989 edits →ArbCom elections are now open!: new section 
(102 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
'']] ]'' 20:09, 2 February 2011 (UTC) '']] ]'' 20:09, 2 February 2011 (UTC)


== Documentation of a tag-team harassment campaign ==
==Your editing history?==
I've removed this material, as both of my harassers have now been site banned. ] (]) 19:36, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
I am surprised at how much for a "new user." Were you a long time AnonIP who took a new name? Hopefully you aren't a banned user now using a ], something ]. Thanks for info. ] (]) 03:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
:I don't clam to know Misplaced Pages rules inside and out. I do, however, know how to read, and that is enough for even a newbie to see that there was a considerable difference between what the rules actually say and what you implied they said, a wide enough distance to justify a comment. ] (]) 04:02, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
::I might as well add this. When I told some friends that I was thinking of editing Misplaced Pages instead of just getting frustrated at its inaccuracy, one of the first things they warned me about was "ownership issues" on certain entries, with editors who ceaselessly patrol their turf with intent to repel all comers, using what ever Nixonian dirty tricks necessary to guarantee the article continued to say that day was night and cold was hot, no matter how wrong. And their advice was simple: in such cases, simply walk away from an article like that. This is advice I am weighing. ] (]) 04:22, 11 February 2011 (UTC)


== Counterpunch == == GGTF arbcom ==


Thanks for taking a sane editing perspective at the ] article, where even my attempts to comment on the talkpage are now being redacted for soapboxing, while denial of Holocaust denial is left standing... ] (]) 16:27, 19 May 2011 (UTC) I don't think your recent edits to the GGTF case pages are particularly helpful. They seem to add nothing to what has already been said and they look somewhat like gravedancing. - ] (]) 13:40, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
:The point I'm trying to make is that ArbCom has decided, rightly, to take a broader look at Carol's patterns of disruptive editing, which extend far beyond GGTF in scope and scale and timeframe. They're right to do so. Those who see Carol's banning are looking only at an incident or two, and I want to remind people there's much more on the ground than that. ] (]) 14:25, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
::Fine, but I think you have made that point now. - ] (]) 18:23, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
:::Fair enough. It's very frustrating to see such an important issue swept into the Carolmooredc Field of Dysfunction. ] (]) 18:24, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
:::... which is the same metaphorical Field that you will be swept into unless you are careful. Like it or not, this thing is being represented as a male vs female issue by some people and, believe me, some of those people are not likely to let it drop. That being the case, you need to be careful not to paint a target on your own back. - ] (]) 18:32, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
::::I understand and appreciate your concern, and that's why I didn't comment until after the proposed decision was already posted, as much as I wanted to do so before. Several times today already I've gotten something ready to post and then withdrawn it. Those who want to see this as exclusively a gender issue, or who find that it resonates with their own experiences with gender and tech culture, will feel and do what they feel and do without my occasional input. My deep frustration is how she has made the issue *more* difficult for women while telling herself she's actually *helping* them. I felt after AE that she likely wasn't long for Misplaced Pages, but it's really a shame that she had to latch onto one of Misplaced Pages's most intractable problems as a last-ditch effort to buoy herself up. ] (]) 20:06, 27 November 2014 (UTC)


== ] ==
== BLPN Israel Shamir ==


Hi,<br>
Hi, disputed cat is under discussion at the BLP noticeboard - please do not replace it without consensus there. Are you aware the article is under editing restrictions - please see the template at the top of the talkpage thanks. ] (]) 16:29, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692225944 -->

Latest revision as of 14:30, 24 November 2015

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Goodwinsands, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Israel Shamir. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:09, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Documentation of a tag-team harassment campaign

I've removed this material, as both of my harassers have now been site banned. Goodwinsands (talk) 19:36, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

GGTF arbcom

I don't think your recent edits to the GGTF case pages are particularly helpful. They seem to add nothing to what has already been said and they look somewhat like gravedancing. - Sitush (talk) 13:40, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

The point I'm trying to make is that ArbCom has decided, rightly, to take a broader look at Carol's patterns of disruptive editing, which extend far beyond GGTF in scope and scale and timeframe. They're right to do so. Those who see Carol's banning are looking only at an incident or two, and I want to remind people there's much more on the ground than that. Goodwinsands (talk) 14:25, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Fine, but I think you have made that point now. - Sitush (talk) 18:23, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Fair enough. It's very frustrating to see such an important issue swept into the Carolmooredc Field of Dysfunction. Goodwinsands (talk) 18:24, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
... which is the same metaphorical Field that you will be swept into unless you are careful. Like it or not, this thing is being represented as a male vs female issue by some people and, believe me, some of those people are not likely to let it drop. That being the case, you need to be careful not to paint a target on your own back. - Sitush (talk) 18:32, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
I understand and appreciate your concern, and that's why I didn't comment until after the proposed decision was already posted, as much as I wanted to do so before. Several times today already I've gotten something ready to post and then withdrawn it. Those who want to see this as exclusively a gender issue, or who find that it resonates with their own experiences with gender and tech culture, will feel and do what they feel and do without my occasional input. My deep frustration is how she has made the issue *more* difficult for women while telling herself she's actually *helping* them. I felt after AE that she likely wasn't long for Misplaced Pages, but it's really a shame that she had to latch onto one of Misplaced Pages's most intractable problems as a last-ditch effort to buoy herself up. Goodwinsands (talk) 20:06, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)