Misplaced Pages

Philosophy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:52, 21 May 2011 view sourceTehblackestman (talk | contribs)2 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:36, 10 January 2025 view source Phlsph7 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,862 edits Relation to other fields: adjust recent copyedit: the sentence refers to the nature and limits of the other fields mentioned in the previous sentence 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Study of general and fundamental questions}}
{{Other uses}} {{Other uses}}
{{Featured article}}
{{pp-move-indef}}
{{pp-semi-indef}}
{{Philosophy-sidebar}}
{{pp-move}}
]'' by ] (1787). The painting depicts the philosopher ] about to take ].]]
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2023}}
] (''left'') and ] (''right''): detail from '']'' by ], 1509]]
]'' by ] is a symbol of philosophical thought.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Pratt|2023|p=}} | {{harvnb|Morujão|Dimas|Relvas|2021|p=}} | {{harvnb|Mitias|2022|p=}} }}</ref>|upright=1.2]]
The anonmen were here such as those connected with existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language.<ref>Jenny Teichmann and Katherine C. Evans, ''Philosophy: A Beginner's Guide'' (Blackwell Publishing, 1999), p. 1: "Philosophy is a study of problems which are ultimate, abstract and very general. These problems are concerned with the nature of existence, knowledge, morality, reason and human purpose."</ref><ref>], ''Philosophy 1: A Guide through the Subject'' (Oxford University Press, 1998), p. 1: "The aim of philosophical inquiry is to gain insight into questions about knowledge, truth, reason, reality, meaning, mind, and value."</ref> It is distinguished from other ways of addressing such problems by its critical, generally systematic approach and its reliance on ].<ref>Anthony Quinton, in T. Honderich (ed.), ''The Oxford Companion to Philosophy'' (Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 666: "Philosophy is rationally critical thinking, of a more or less systematic kind about the general nature of the world (metaphysics or theory of existence), the justification of belief (epistemology or theory of knowledge), and the conduct of life (ethics or theory of value). Each of the three elements in this list has a non-philosophical counterpart, from which it is distinguished by its explicitly rational and critical way of proceeding and by its systematic nature. Everyone has some general conception of the nature of the world in which they live and of their place in it. Metaphysics replaces the unargued assumptions embodied in such a conception with a rational and organized body of beliefs about the world as a whole. Everyone has occasion to doubt and question beliefs, their own or those of others, with more or less success and without any theory of what they are doing. Epistemology seeks by argument to make explicit the rules of correct belief formation. Everyone governs their conduct by directing it to desired or valued ends. Ethics, or moral philosophy, in its most inclusive sense, seeks to articulate, in rationally systematic form, the rules or principles involved."</ref> The word "philosophy" comes from the ] φιλοσοφία (''philosophia''), which literally means "love of wisdom".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0057%3Aentry%3D%23111487 |title=Philosophia, Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, '&#39;A Greek-English Lexicon'&#39;, at Perseus |publisher=Perseus.tufts.edu |date= |accessdate=2010-08-22}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=philosophy&searchmode=none |title=Online Etymology Dictionary |publisher=Etymonline.com |date= |accessdate=2010-08-22}}</ref><ref>The definition of philosophy is: "1.orig., love of, or the search for, wisdom or knowledge 2.theory or logical analysis of the principles underlying conduct, thought, knowledge, and the nature of the universe".{{cite book |title=Webster's New World Dictionary |edition=Second College}}</ref>
{{Philosophy sidebar}}
'''Philosophy''' ('love of wisdom' in ]) is a systematic study of general and fundamental questions concerning topics like ], ], ], ], ], and ]. It is a rational and critical inquiry that reflects on its methods and assumptions.


Historically, many of the individual ]s, such as ] and ], formed part of philosophy. However, they are considered separate academic disciplines in the modern sense of the term. Influential traditions in the ] include ], ], ], and ]. Western philosophy originated in ] and covers a wide area of philosophical subfields. A central topic in Arabic–Persian philosophy is the relation between reason and ]. Indian philosophy combines the ] problem of how to reach ] with the exploration of the nature of reality and the ways of arriving at knowledge. Chinese philosophy focuses principally on practical issues about right social conduct, government, and ].
==Branches of philosophy==
The following branches are the main areas of study


Major branches of philosophy are ], ], ], and ]. Epistemology studies what knowledge is and how to acquire it. Ethics investigates moral principles and what constitutes right conduct. Logic is the study of ] and explores how good ]s can be distinguished from bad ones. Metaphysics examines the most general features of ], existence, ], and ]. Other subfields are ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. Within each branch, there are competing ] that promote different principles, theories, or methods.
* ''']''' is the study of the nature of reality, including the relationship between mind and body, substance and accident, events and causation. Traditional branches are ] and ].
* ''']''' is concerned with the nature and scope of knowledge, and whether knowledge is possible. Among its central concerns has been the challenge posed by ] and the relationships between ], ], and ].
* ''']''', or "moral philosophy", is concerned primarily with the question of the best way to live, and secondarily, concerning the question of whether this question can be answered. The main branches of ethics are ], ], and ]. Meta-ethics concerns the nature of ethical thought, such as the origins of the words good and bad, and origins of other comparative words of various ethical systems, whether there are absolute ethical truths, and how such truths could be known. Normative ethics are more concerned with the questions of how one ought to act, and what the right course of action is. This is where most ethical theories are generated.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/Normative_ethics</ref> Lastly, applied ethics go beyond theory and step into real world ethical practice, such as questions of whether or not abortion is correct.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/Applied_ethics</ref> Ethics is also associated with the idea of ], and the two are often interchangeable.
* ''']''' is the study of ] and the relationship of individuals (or families and clans) to communities including the ]. It includes questions about justice, law, property, and the rights and obligations of the citizen. Politics and ethics are traditionally inter-linked subjects, as both discuss the question of what is good and how people should live.
* ''']''' deals with beauty, art, enjoyment, sensory-emotional values, perception, and matters of taste and sentiment.
* ''']''' is the study of valid argument forms. Beginning in the late 19th century, ]s such as ] focused on a mathematical treatment of logic, and today the subject of logic has two broad divisions: ] (formal symbolic logic) and what is now called ].
* ''']''' deals with the nature of the mind and its relationship to the body, and is typified by disputes between ] and ]. In recent years there has been increasing similarity between this branch of philosophy and ].
* ''']''' is inquiry into the nature, origins, and usage of language.
* ''']''' is a branch of philosophy that asks questions about religion.


Philosophers use a great variety of methods to arrive at philosophical knowledge. They include ], reliance on ] and ]s, use of ], analysis of ], ], and ]. Philosophy is related to many other fields, including the sciences, ], ], ], and ]. It provides an ] perspective and studies the scope and fundamental concepts of these fields. It also investigates their methods and ethical implications.
Most academic subjects have a philosophy, for example the ], the ], the ], the ], and the ]. In addition, a range of academic subjects have emerged to deal with areas that historically were the subject of philosophy. These include ], ], and ].


{{toclimit|3}}
==Western philosophy==
{{Main|Western philosophy|History of Western philosophy}}
The introduction of the terms "philosopher" and "philosophy" has been ascribed to the Greek thinker ].<ref>See ]: "Lives of Eminent Philosophers", ; ]: "Tusculanae disputationes", V, 8–9</ref> The ascription is said to be based on a passage in a lost work of Herakleides Pontikos, a disciple of ]. It is considered to be part of the widespread body of legends of Pythagoras of this time. "Philosopher" was understood as a word which contrasted with "]" (from ''sophoi''). Traveling sophists or "wise men" were important in ], often earning money as teachers, whereas philosophers are "lovers of wisdom" and not professionals.


== Etymology ==
Historians of western philosophy usually divide the subject into three or more periods, the most important being ], ], and ].<ref>For example, the multi-author Oxford History of Western Philosophy breaks the subject into eight volumes: ancient, medieval, Renaissance, two volumes covering the period 1600–1750, two volumes covering 1750–1945, and one volume on analytic philosophy since 1945. Anthony Kenny's ''New History of Western Philosophy'' is divided in four volumes: ancient, medieval, early modern (1500–1830), and later modern (1830 to the present). The more technical Cambridge History of Philosophy divides the topic into nine periods: Greek philosophy to Aristotle, Hellenistic philosophy, later Greek and early medieval, later medieval, Renaissance, three volumes for the 17th–19th centuries, and a final volume on 1870–1945.</ref>
The word ''philosophy'' comes from the ] words {{lang|grc|φίλος}} ({{transl|grc|philos}}) {{gloss|love}} and {{lang|grc|σοφία}} ({{transl|grc|sophia}}) {{gloss|wisdom}}.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Hoad|1993|p=350}} |2={{harvnb|Simpson|2002|loc=Philosophy}} |3={{harvnb|Jacobs|2022|p=}} }}</ref>{{efn|The Ancient Greek ''philosophos'' ('philosopher') was itself possibly borrowed from the ] term ''mer-rekh'' (''mr-rḫ'') meaning 'lover of wisdom'.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Herbjørnsrud|2021|p=123}} |2={{harvnb|Herbjørnsrud|2023|p=X}} }}</ref>}} Some sources say that the term was coined by the ] philosopher ], but this is not certain.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Bottin|1993|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Jaroszyński|2018|p=}} }}</ref>


]'s observation of how ].]]
===Ancient philosophy (c. 600 BC–c. AD 400)===
{{Main|Ancient philosophy}}
]]]
]]]
Ancient philosophy is the philosophy of the Graeco-Roman world from the 6th century BC to the 6th century AD. It is usually divided into three periods: the ], the period of ] and ], and the post-Aristotelian (or ]) period. A fourth period that is sometimes added includes the ] and ] philosophers of ]. The most important of the ancient philosophers (in terms of subsequent influence) are Plato and Aristotle.<ref name="Oxford Companion to Philosophy">''Oxford Companion to Philosophy''</ref>


The word entered the English language primarily from ] and ] starting around 1175 CE. The French {{lang|fr|philosophie}} is itself a borrowing from the Latin {{lang|la|philosophia}}. The term ''philosophy'' acquired the meanings of "advanced study of the speculative subjects (], ], ], and ])", "deep wisdom consisting of love of truth and virtuous living", "profound learning as transmitted by the ancient writers", and "the study of the fundamental nature of ], ], and ], and the basic limits of human understanding".<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|OED staff|2022|loc=Philosophy, n.}} |2={{harvnb|Hoad|1993|p=350}} }}</ref>
The main subjects of ancient philosophy are: understanding the fundamental causes and principles of the ]; explaining it in an economical way; the epistemological problem of reconciling the diversity and change of the natural universe, with the possibility of obtaining fixed and certain knowledge about it; questions about things that cannot be perceived by the senses, such as ]s, ], ], and ]. Socrates is said to have been the initiator of more focused study upon the human things including the analysis of patterns of ] and argument and the nature of ] and the importance of understanding and knowledge in order to pursue it; the explication of the concept of ], and its relation to various ].<ref name="Oxford Companion to Philosophy"/>


Before the modern age, the term ''philosophy'' was used in a wide sense. It included most forms of ] inquiry, such as the individual ], as its subdisciplines.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Ten|1999|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Tuomela|1985|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Grant|2007|p=}} }}</ref> For instance, ] was a major branch of philosophy.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Kenny|2018|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Grant|2007|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Cotterell|2017|p=}} |4={{harvnb|Maddy|2022|p=}} }}</ref> This branch of philosophy encompassed a wide range of fields, including disciplines like physics, ], and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Grant|2007|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Ten|1999|p=}} }}</ref> An example of this usage is the 1687 book '']'' by ]. This book referred to natural philosophy in its title, but it is today considered a book of physics.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Cotterell|2017|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Maddy|2022|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Regenbogen|2010|loc=}} }}</ref>
In this period the crucial features of the ] were established: a critical approach to received or established views, and the appeal to reason and argumentation.
{{clr}}


The meaning of ''philosophy'' changed toward the end of the modern period when it acquired the more narrow meaning common today. In this new sense, the term is mainly associated with philosophical disciplines like metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics. Among other topics, it covers the rational study of reality, knowledge, and values. It is distinguished from other disciplines of rational inquiry such as the empirical sciences and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century}} |2={{harvnb|Regenbogen|2010}} |3={{harvnb|Ten|1999|p=}} |4={{harvnb|AHD Staff|2022}} }}</ref>
===Medieval philosophy (c. 400–c. 1350)===
{{Main|Medieval philosophy}}
]]]
Medieval philosophy is the philosophy of ] and the ] during the ], roughly extending from the Christianization of the ] until the Renaissance.<ref>Frederick Copleston, ''A History of Philosophy, Volume II: From Augustine to Scotus'' (Burns & Oates, 1950), p. 1, dates medieval philosophy proper from the Carolingian Renaissance in the eighth century to the end of the fourteenth century, though he includes ] and the Patristic fathers as precursors. Desmond Henry, in Paul Edwards (ed.), ''The Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' (Macmillan, 1967), vol. 5, pp. 252–257, starts with Augustine and ends with ] in the late fourteenth century. David Luscombe, ''Medieval Thought'' (Oxford University Press, 1997), dates medieval philosophy from the conversion of ] in 312 to the ] in the 1520s. Christopher Hughes, in A.C. Grayling (ed.), ''Philosophy 2: Further through the Subject'' (Oxford University Press, 1998), covers philosophers from Augustine to Ockham. Jorge J.E. Gracia, in Nicholas Bunnin and E.P. Tsui-James (eds.), ''The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy'', 2nd ed. (Blackwell, 2003), p. 620, identifies medieval philosophy as running from Augustine to ] in the seventeenth century. Anthony Kenny, ''A New History of Western Philosophy, Volume II: Medieval Philosophy'' (Oxford University Press, 2005), begins with Augustine and ends with the Lateran Council of 1512.</ref> Medieval philosophy is defined partly by the rediscovery and further development of classical ] and ], and partly by the need to address theological problems and to integrate the then widespread sacred doctrines of ] (], ], and ]) with ] learning.


== Conceptions of philosophy ==
The history of western European medieval philosophy is traditionally divided into two main periods: the period in the ] following the ] until the 12th century, when the works of ] and ] were preserved and cultivated; and the "golden age" of the 12th, 13th and 14th centuries in the Latin West, which witnessed the culmination of the recovery of ancient philosophy, and significant developments in the field of ], ] and ].
{{see also|Metaphilosophy}}


=== General conception ===
The medieval era was disparagingly treated by the Renaissance humanists, who saw it as a barbaric "middle" period between the classical age of Greek and Roman culture, and the "rebirth" or ''renaissance'' of classical culture. Yet this period of nearly a thousand years was the longest period of philosophical development in Europe, and possibly the richest. ] has argued that "in intensity, sophistication, and achievement, the philosophical flowering in the thirteenth century could be rightly said to rival the golden age of Greek philosophy in the fourth century B.C."<ref>Gracia, p. 1</ref>
The practice of philosophy is characterized by several general features: it is a form of rational inquiry, it aims to be systematic, and it tends to critically reflect on its own methods and presuppositions.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Audi|2006|loc=}} |2={{harvnb|Quinton|2005|p=702}} |3={{harvnb|Regenbogen|2010|loc=}} |4={{harvnb|EB Staff|2023a}} |5={{harvnb|OUP Staff|2020}} |6={{harvnb|Adler|2000}} }}</ref> It requires attentively thinking long and carefully about the provocative, vexing, and enduring problems central to the human condition.{{sfn|Perry|Bratman|Fischer|2010|p=}}


The philosophical pursuit of wisdom involves asking general and fundamental questions. It often does not result in straightforward answers but may help a person to better understand the topic, examine their life, dispel confusion, and overcome prejudices and self-deceptive ideas associated with common sense.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Russell|1912|p=91}} |2={{harvnb|Blackwell|2013|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Pojman|2009|page=2}} |4={{harvnb|Kenny|2004|p=xv}} |5={{harvnb|Vintiadis|2020|p=}} }}</ref> For example, Socrates stated that "]" to highlight the role of philosophical inquiry in understanding one's own existence.{{sfn|Plato|2023|loc=}}{{sfn|McCutcheon|2014|p=}} And according to ], "the man who has no tincture of philosophy goes through life imprisoned in the prejudices derived from common sense, from the habitual beliefs of his age or his nation, and from convictions which have grown up in his mind without the cooperation or consent of his deliberate reason."<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Russell|1912|p=91}} |2={{harvnb|Blackwell|2013|p=}} }}</ref>
Some problems discussed throughout this period are the relation of ] to ], the existence and unity of ], the object of ] and ], the problems of knowledge, of universals, and of individuation.


=== Academic definitions ===
Philosophers from the Middle Ages include the ] philosophers ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]; the Jewish philosophers ] and ]; and the Christian philosophers ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. The medieval tradition of ] continued to flourish as late as the 17th century, in figures such as ] and ].
{{main|Definitions of philosophy}}
Attempts to provide more precise definitions of philosophy are controversial<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Quinton|2005|p=702}} |2={{harvnb|Regenbogen|2010|loc=}} }}</ref> and are studied in ].{{sfn|Overgaard|Gilbert|Burwood|2013|pp=vii, 17}} Some approaches argue that there is a set of essential features shared by all parts of philosophy. Others see only weaker family resemblances or contend that it is merely an empty blanket term.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Overgaard|Gilbert|Burwood|2013|pp=|loc=What Is Philosophy?}} |2={{harvnb|Mittelstraß|2005|loc=}} }}</ref> Precise definitions are often only accepted by theorists belonging to a certain ] and are revisionistic according to Søren Overgaard et al. in that many presumed parts of philosophy would not deserve the title "philosophy" if they were true.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Joll}} |2={{harvnb|Overgaard|Gilbert|Burwood|2013|pp=|loc=What Is Philosophy?}} }}</ref>


Some definitions characterize philosophy in relation to its method, like pure reasoning. Others focus on its topic, for example, as the study of the biggest patterns of the world as a whole or as the attempt to answer the big questions.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Overgaard|Gilbert|Burwood|2013|pp=|loc=What Is Philosophy?}} |2={{harvnb|Rescher|2013|loc=|pp=1–3}} |3={{harvnb|Nuttall|2013|loc=1. The Nature of Philosophy|pp=}} }}</ref> Such an approach is pursued by ], who holds that the task of philosophy is united by four questions: "What can I know?"; "What should I do?"; "What may I hope?"; and "What is the human being?"<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Guyer|2014|pp=}} |2={{harvnb|Kant|1998|p=A805/B833}} |3={{harvnb|Kant|1992|p=9:25}} }}</ref> Both approaches have the problem that they are usually either too wide, by including non-philosophical disciplines, or too narrow, by excluding some philosophical sub-disciplines.{{sfn|Overgaard|Gilbert|Burwood|2013|pp=|loc=What Is Philosophy?}}
Aquinas, father of ], was immensely influential in Catholic Europe, placed a great emphasis on reason and argumentation, and was one of the first to use the new translation of Aristotle's metaphysical and epistemological writing. His work was a significant departure from the ] and Augustinian thinking that had dominated much of early Scholasticism.


Many definitions of philosophy emphasize its intimate relation to science.{{sfn|Regenbogen|2010|loc=}} In this sense, philosophy is sometimes understood as a proper science in its own right. According to some ], such as ], philosophy is an empirical yet abstract science that is concerned with wide-ranging empirical patterns instead of particular observations.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Overgaard|Gilbert|Burwood|2013|pp=|loc=What Is Philosophy?}} |2={{harvnb|Hylton|Kemp|2020}} }}</ref> Science-based definitions usually face the problem of explaining why philosophy in its long history has not progressed to the same extent or in the same way as the sciences.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Overgaard|Gilbert|Burwood|2013|pp=|loc=What Is Philosophy?}} |2={{harvnb|Chalmers|2015|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Dellsén|Lawler|Norton|2021|pp=814–815}} }}</ref> This problem is avoided by seeing philosophy as an immature or provisional science whose subdisciplines cease to be philosophy once they have fully developed.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Regenbogen|2010|loc=}} |2={{harvnb|Mittelstraß|2005|loc=}} |3={{harvnb|Overgaard|Gilbert|Burwood|2013|pp=|loc=What Is Philosophy?}} }}</ref> In this sense, philosophy is sometimes described as "the midwife of the sciences".<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Hacker|2013|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Regenbogen|2010|loc=}} }}</ref>
===Renaissance philosophy (c. 1350–c. 1600)===
{{Main|Renaissance philosophy}}
]]]
The Renaissance ("rebirth") was a period of transition between the Middle Ages and modern thought,<ref>Charles Schmitt and Quentin Skinner (eds.), ''The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy'' (Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. 5, loosely define the period as extending "from the age of Ockham to the revisionary work of Bacon, Descartes and their contemporaries."</ref> in which the recovery of classical texts helped shift philosophical interests away from technical studies in logic, metaphysics, and theology towards eclectic inquiries into morality, philology, and mysticism.<ref>Frederick Copleston, ''A History of Philosophy, Volume III: From Ockham to Suarez'' (The Newman Press, 1953) p. 18: "When one looks at Renaissance philosophy ... one is faced at first sight with a rather bewildering assortment of philosophies."</ref><ref>Brian Copenhaver and Charles Schmitt, ''Renaissance Philosophy'' (Oxford University Press, 1992), p. 4: "one may identify the hallmark of Renaissance philosophy as an accelerated and enlarged interest, stimulated by newly available texts, in primary sources of Greek and Roman thought that were previously unknown or partially known or little read."</ref> The study of the classics and the humane arts generally, such as history and literature, enjoyed a scholarly interest hitherto unknown in Christendom, a tendency referred to as ].<ref>Jorge J.E. Gracia in Nicholas Bunnin and E.P. Tsui-James (eds.), ''The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy'', 2nd ed. (Blackwell, 2002), p. 621: "the humanists ... restored man to the centre of attention and channeled their efforts to the recovery and transmission of classical learning, particularly in the philosophy of Plato."</ref><ref>Copleston, ''ibid.'': "The bulk of Renaissance thinkers, scholars and scientists were, of course, Christians ... but none the less the classical revival ... helped to bring to the fore a conception of autonomous man or an idea of the development of the human personality, which, though generally Christian, was more 'naturalistic' and less ascetic than the mediaeval conception."</ref> Displacing the medieval interest in metaphysics and logic, the humanists followed ] in making man and his virtues the focus of philosophy.<ref>Charles B. Schmitt and Quentin Skinner (eds.), ''The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy'', pp. 61 and 63: "From Petrarch the early humanists learnt their conviction that the revival of ''humanae literae'' was only the first step in a greater intellectual renewal" "the very conception of philosophy was changing because its chief object was now man—man was at centre of every inquiry".</ref><ref name="The Renaissance Philosophy of Man">{{Cite book|editor1-last=Cassirer|editor2-last=Kristeller|editor3-last=Randall|title=The Renaissance Philosophy of Man|year=1948|publisher=University of Chicago Press|chapter=Introduction|postscript=<!-- Bot inserted parameter. Either remove it; or change its value to "." for the cite to end in a ".", as necessary. -->{{inconsistent citations}}}}</ref>


Other definitions focus on the contrast between science and philosophy. A common theme among many such conceptions is that philosophy is concerned with ], ], or the clarification of language.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Overgaard|Gilbert|Burwood|2013|pp=|loc=What Is Philosophy?}} |2={{harvnb|Rescher|2013|loc=|pp=1–2}} }}</ref> According to one view, philosophy is ], which involves finding the ] for the application of concepts.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Overgaard|Gilbert|Burwood|2013|pp=|loc=What Is Philosophy?}} |2={{harvnb|Nuttall|2013|loc=1. The Nature of Philosophy|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Shaffer|2015|pp=}} }}</ref> Another definition characterizes philosophy as ''] about thinking'' to emphasize its self-critical, reflective nature.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Overgaard|Gilbert|Burwood|2013|pp=|loc=What Is Philosophy?}} |2={{harvnb|Nuttall|2013|loc=1. The Nature of Philosophy|p=}} }}</ref> A further approach presents philosophy as a ] therapy. According to ], for instance, philosophy aims at dispelling misunderstandings to which humans are susceptible due to the confusing structure of ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Regenbogen|2010|loc=}} |2={{harvnb|Joll|loc=Lead Section, § 2c. Ordinary Language Philosophy and the Later Wittgenstein}} |3={{harvnb|Biletzki|Matar|2021}} }}</ref>
The study of classical philosophy also developed in two new ways. On the one hand, the study of Aristotle was changed through the influence of ]. The disagreements between these Averroist Aristotelians, and more orthodox catholic Aristotelians such as ] and ] eventually contributed to the development of a "humanist Aristotelianism" developed in the Renaissance, as exemplified in the thought of ] and ]. Secondly, as an alternative to Aristotle, the study of ] and the ] became common. This was assisted by the rediscovery of works which had not been well known previously in Western Europe. Notable Renaissance Platonists include ], and later ] and ].<ref name="The Renaissance Philosophy of Man"/>


], such as ], characterize philosophy as a "rigorous science" investigating ]s.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Joll|loc=§ 4.a.i}} |2={{harvnb|Gelan|2020|p=|loc=Husserl's Idea of Rigorous Science and Its Relevance for the Human and Social Sciences}} |3={{harvnb|Ingarden|1975|pp=|loc=The Concept of Philosophy as Rigorous Science}} |4={{harvnb|Tieszen|2005|p=}} }}</ref> They practice a radical ] of theoretical assumptions about reality to get back to the "things themselves", that is, as originally given in experience. They contend that this base-level of experience provides the foundation for higher-order theoretical knowledge, and that one needs to understand the former to understand the latter.{{sfn|Smith|loc=§ 2.b}}
The Renaissance also renewed interest in anti-Aristotelian theories of nature considered as an organic, living whole comprehensible independently of theology, as in the work of ], ], ], ], and ].<ref>Copenhaver and Schmitt, ''Renaissance Philosophy'', pp. 285–328.</ref> Such movements in natural philosophy dovetailed with a revival of interest in occultism, magic, ], and ], which were thought to yield hidden ways of knowing and mastering nature (e.g., in Marsilio Ficino and Giovanni Pico della Mirandola).<ref>Pico Della Mirandola, Conclusiones philosophicae, cabalisticae et theologicae; Giordano Bruno, De Magia</ref>


An early approach found in ] and ] is that philosophy is the spiritual practice of developing one's rational capacities.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Banicki|2014|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Hadot|1995|loc=}} }}</ref> This practice is an expression of the philosopher's love of wisdom and has the aim of improving one's ] by leading a reflective life.{{sfn|Grimm|Cohoe|2021|pp=}} For example, the ] saw philosophy as an exercise to train the mind and thereby achieve ] and flourish in life.{{sfn|Sharpe|Ure|2021|pp=}}
These new movements in philosophy developed contemporaneously with larger religious and political transformations in Europe: the ] and the decline of ]. Though the theologians of the Protestant Reformation showed little direct interest in philosophy, their destruction of the traditional foundations of theological and intellectual authority harmonized with a revival of ] and skepticism in thinkers such as ], ], and ].<ref>Richard Popkin, ''The History of Scepticism from Savonarola to Bayle'' (Oxford University Press, 2003).</ref><ref>Copleston, pp. 228–229.</ref><ref>Kenny, ''A New History of Western Philosophy'', vol. 3 (Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 8: "The Lutheran Reformation gave new impetus to the sceptical trend."</ref> Meanwhile, the gradual centralization of political power in nation-states was echoed by the emergence of secular political philosophies, as in the works of ] (often described as the first modern political thinker, or a key turning point towards modern political thinking<ref>"Machiavelli appears as the first modern political thinker" {{Cite book|title=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy|chapter=Hobbes: Moral and Political Philosophy|first=Garrath|last=Williams|url=http://www.iep.utm.edu/hobmoral/|postscript=<!-- Bot inserted parameter. Either remove it; or change its value to "." for the cite to end in a ".", as necessary. -->{{inconsistent citations}}}}. "Machiavelli ought not really to be classified as either purely an "ancient" or a "modern," but instead deserves to be located in the interstices between the two." {{Cite book|chapter=Niccolò Machiavelli|title=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/machiavelli/|first=Cary |last=Nederman|postscript=<!-- Bot inserted parameter. Either remove it; or change its value to "." for the cite to end in a ".", as necessary. -->{{inconsistent citations}}}}</ref>), ], ], ], ], and ].<ref>Copenhaver and Schmitt, ''Renaissance Philosophy'', pp. 274–284.</ref><ref>Schmitt and Skinner, ''The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy'', pp. 430–452.</ref>


== History {{anchor|Historical overview}} ==
===Early modern philosophy (c. 1600–c. 1800)===
{{main|History of philosophy}}
]]]
As a discipline, the history of philosophy aims to provide a systematic and chronological exposition of philosophical concepts and doctrines.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Copleston|2003|pp=4–6}} |2={{harvnb|Santinello|Piaia|2010|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Verene|2008|pp=}} }}</ref> Some theorists see it as a part of ], but it also investigates questions not covered by intellectual history such as whether the theories of past philosophers are true and have remained philosophically relevant.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Laerke|Smith|Schliesser|2013|pp=}} |2={{harvnb|Verene|2008|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Frede|2022|p=x}} |4={{harvnb|Beaney|2013|p=}} }}</ref> The history of philosophy is primarily concerned with theories based on rational inquiry and argumentation; some historians understand it in a looser sense that includes ]s, ], and proverbial lore.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Scharfstein|1998|pp=}} |2={{harvnb|Perrett|2016|loc=Is There Indian Philosophy?}} |3={{harvnb|Smart|2008|pp=1–3}} |4={{harvnb|Rescher|2014|p=}} |5={{harvnb|Parkinson|2005|pp=1–2}} }}</ref>
{{Main|Modern philosophy}}


Influential traditions in the history of philosophy include ], ], ], and ]. Other philosophical traditions are ], ], and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Smart|2008|pp=v, 1–12}} |2={{harvnb|Flavel|Robbiano|2023|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Solomon|Higgins|2003|pp=}} |4={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=Contents, Preface}} }}</ref>
Chronologically, the early modern era of western philosophy is usually identified with the 17th and 18th centuries, with the 18th century often being referred to as the ].<ref>Donald Rutherford, ''The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'' (Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. xiii, defines its subject thus: "what has come to be known as "early modern philosophy"—roughly, philosophy spanning the period between the end of the sixteenth century and the end of the eighteenth century, or, in terms of figures, Montaigne through Kant." ], ''A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'' (Blackwell, 2002), p. 1, likewise identifies its subject as "the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries". Anthony Kenny, ''The Oxford History of Western Philosophy'' (Clarendon: Oxford University Press, 1994), p. 107, introduces "early modern philosophy" as "the writings of the classical philosophers of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in Europe".</ref> Modern philosophy is distinguished from its predecessors by its increasing independence from traditional authorities such as the Church, academia, and Aristotelianism;<ref>Steven Nadler, ''A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'', pp. 1–2: "By the seventeenth century it had become more common to find original philosophical minds working outside the strictures of the university—i.e., ecclesiastic—framework. by the end of the eighteenth century, was a secular enterprise."</ref><ref>], ''A New History of Western Philosophy'', vol. 3 (Oxford University Press, 2006), p. xii: "To someone approaching the early modern period of philosophy from an ancient and medieval background the most striking feature of the age is the absence of Aristotle from the philosophic scene."</ref> a new focus on the foundations of knowledge and metaphysical system-building;<ref>Donald Rutherford, ''The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'' (Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 1: "epistemology assumes a new significance in the early modern period as philosophers strive to define the conditions and limits of human knowledge."</ref><ref>Kenny, ''A New History of Western Philosophy'', vol. 3, p. 211: "The period between Descartes and Hegel was the great age of metaphysical system-building."</ref> and the emergence of modern physics out of natural philosophy.<ref>Kenny, ''A New History of Western Philosophy'', vol. 3, pp. 179–180: "the seventeenth century saw the gradual separation of the old discipline of natural philosophy into the science of physics y the nineteenth century physics was a fully mature empirical science, operating independently of philosophy."</ref> Other central topics of philosophy in this period include the nature of the mind and its relation to the body, the implications of the new natural sciences for traditional theological topics such as free will and God, and the emergence of a secular basis for moral and political philosophy.<ref>Kenny, ''A New History of Western Philosophy'', vol. 3, pp. 212–331.</ref> These trends first distinctively coalesce in ]'s call for a new, empirical program for expanding knowledge, and soon found massively influential form in the mechanical physics and rationalist metaphysics of ].<ref>Nadler, ''A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'', pp. 2–3: "Why should the early modern period in philosophy begin with Descartes and Bacon, for example, rather than with Erasmus and Montaigne? Suffice it to say that at the beginning of the seventeenth century, and especially with Bacon and Descartes, certain questions and concerns come to the fore—a variety of issues that motivated the inquiries and debates that would would characterize much philosophical thinking for the next two centuries."</ref> ] was the first to apply this methodology systematically to ] and is the originator of modern political philosophy, including the modern theory of a "]".<ref>{{Cite book|url=http://www.iep.utm.edu/hobmoral/|title=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy|chapter=Hobbes: Moral and Political Philosophy|postscript=<!-- Bot inserted parameter. Either remove it; or change its value to "." for the cite to end in a ".", as necessary. -->{{inconsistent citations}}}}: "Hobbes is the founding father of modern political philosophy. Directly or indirectly, he has set the terms of debate about the fundamentals of political life right into our own times."</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/contractarianism/|chapter=Contractarianismtitle=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|postscript=<!-- Bot inserted parameter. Either remove it; or change its value to "." for the cite to end in a ".", as necessary. -->{{inconsistent citations}}}}: "Contractarianism stems from the Hobbesian line of social contract thought"</ref> The academic canon of early modern philosophy generally includes ], ], ], ], ], ], and ],<ref>Rutherford, ''The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'', p. 1: "Most often this has been associated with the achievements of a handful of great thinkers: the so-called 'rationalists' (Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz) and 'empiricists' (Locke, Berkeley, Hume), whose inquiries culminate in Kant's 'Critical philosophy.' These canonical figures have been celebrated for the depth and rigor of their treatments of perennial philosophical questions..."</ref><ref>Nadler, ''A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'', p. 2: "The study of early modern philosophy demands that we pay attention to a wide variety of questions and an expansive pantheon of thinkers: the traditional canonical figures (Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume), to be sure, but also a large 'supporting cast'..."</ref><ref>], "Seven Thinkers and How They Grew: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz; Locke, Berkeley, Hume; Kant" in Rorty, Schneewind, and Skinner (eds.), ''Philosophy in History'' (Cambridge University Press, 1984), p. 125: "Literary, philosophical, and historical studies often rely on a notion of what is ''canonical''. In American philosophy scholars go from Jonathan Edwards to John Dewey; in American literature from James Fenimore Cooper to F. Scott Fitzgerald; in political theory from Plato to Hobbes and Locke The texts or authors who fill in the blanks from A to Z in these, and other intellectual traditions, constitute the canon, and there is an accompanying narrative that links text to text or author to author, a 'history of' American literature, economic thought, and so on. The most conventional of such histories are embodied in university courses and the textbooks that accompany them. This essay examines one such course, the History of Modern Philosophy, and the texts that helped to create it. If a philosopher in the United States were asked why the seven people in my title comprise Modern Philosophy, the initial response would be: they were the best, and there are historical and philosophical connections among them."</ref> though influential contributions to philosophy were made by many thinkers in this period, such as ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. ] was a seminal figure in initiating reaction against the Enlightenment. The approximate end of the early modern period is most often identified with ]'s systematic attempt to limit metaphysics, justify scientific knowledge, and reconcile both of these with morality and freedom.<ref>Rutherford, ''The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy'', p. 1.</ref><ref>Kenny, ''A New History of Western Philosophy'', vol. 3, p. xiii.</ref><ref>Nadler, A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, p. 3.</ref>


===19th-century philosophy=== === Western ===
{{Main|19th-century philosophy}} {{main|Western philosophy}}


] was a major figure in ancient philosophy and developed a comprehensive system of thought including metaphysics, logic, ethics, politics, and natural science.{{sfn|Shields|2022|loc=Lead Section}}]]
Later modern philosophy is usually considered to begin after the philosophy of ] at the beginning of the 19th century.<ref name=Shand>Shand, John (ed.) ''Central Works of Philosophy, Vol.3 The Nineteenth Century'' (McGill-Queens, 2005)</ref> German philosophy exercised broad influence in this century, owing in part to the dominance of the German university system.<ref>Thomas Baldwin (ed.), ''The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945'' (Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 4: "by the 1870s Germany contained much of the best universities in the world. There were certainly more professors of philosophy in Germany in 1870 than anywhere else in the world, and perhaps more even than everywhere else put together."</ref> ]s, such as ], ], and ], transformed the work of Kant by maintaining that the world is constituted by a rational or mind-like process, and as such is entirely knowable.<ref>Beiser, Frederick C. ''The Cambridge Companion to Hegel'', (Cambridge, 1993).</ref> ]'s identification of this world-constituting process as an irrational ] influenced later 19th- and early 20th-century thinking, such as the work of ] and ].


Western philosophy originated in ] in the 6th century BCE with the ]. They attempted to provide rational explanations of the ] as a whole.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Blackson|2011|loc=}} |2={{harvnb|Graham|2023|loc=Lead Section, 1. Presocratic Thought}} |3={{harvnb|Duignan|2010|pp=}} }}</ref> The philosophy following them was shaped by ] (469–399 BCE), ] (427–347 BCE), and ] (384–322 BCE). They expanded the range of topics to questions like ], ], and what the ] and ] is.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Graham|2023|loc=Lead Section, 2. Socrates, 3. Plato, 4. Aristotle}} |2={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=Socrates, Plato, Aristotle}} }}</ref> The later part of the ancient period was marked by the emergence of philosophical movements, for example, ], ], ], and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Long|1986|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Blackson|2011|loc=Chapter 10}} |3={{harvnb|Graham|2023|loc=6. Post-Hellenistic Thought}} }}</ref> The medieval period started in the 5th century CE. Its focus was on religious topics and many thinkers used ancient philosophy to explain and further elaborate ]s.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Duignan|2010|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Lagerlund|2020|p=v}} |3={{harvnb|Marenbon|2023|loc=Lead Section}} |4={{harvnb|MacDonald|Kretzmann|1998|loc=Lead Section}} }}</ref><ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=Part II: Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy}} |2={{harvnb|Adamson|2019|pp=3–4}} }}</ref>
After Hegel's death in 1831, 19th-century philosophy largely turned against idealism in favor of varieties of philosophical ], such as the ] of ], the empiricism of ], and the materialism of ]. Logic began a period of its most significant advances since the inception of the discipline, as increasing mathematical precision opened entire fields of inference to formalization in the work of ] and ].<ref>Baldwin (ed.), ''The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945'', p. 119: "within a hundred years of the first stirrings in the early nineteenth century had undergone the most fundamental transformation and substantial advance in its history."</ref> Other philosophers who initiated lines of thought that would continue to shape philosophy into the 20th century include


The ] period started in the 14th century and saw a renewed interest in schools of ancient philosophy, in particular ]. ] also emerged in this period.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Parkinson|2005|pp=1, 3}} |2={{harvnb|Adamson|2022|pp=155–157}} |3={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=Philosophy in the Renaissance}} |4={{harvnb|Chambre|Maurer|Stroll|McLellan|2023|loc=Renaissance Philosophy}} }}</ref> The modern period started in the 17th century. One of its central concerns was how philosophical and scientific knowledge are created. Specific importance was given to the ] and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=The Rise of Modern Thought; The Eighteenth-century Enlightenment}} |2={{harvnb|Anstey|Vanzo|2023|pp=}} }}</ref> Many of these innovations were used in the ] to challenge traditional authorities.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=The Eighteenth-Century Enlightenment}} |2={{harvnb|Kenny|2006|pp=90–92}} }}</ref> Several attempts to develop comprehensive systems of philosophy were made in the 19th century, for instance, by ] and ].{{sfn|Grayling|2019|loc=Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century}} Influential developments in 20th-century philosophy were the emergence and application of ], the focus on the ] as well as ], and movements in ] like phenomenology, ], and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=Philosophy in the Twentieth Century}} |2={{harvnb|Livingston|2017|loc=}} |3={{harvnb|Silverman|Welton|1988|pp=}} }}</ref> The 20th century saw a rapid expansion of academic philosophy in terms of the number of philosophical publications and philosophers working at ]s.{{sfn|Grayling|2019|loc=Philosophy in the Twentieth Century}} There was also a noticeable growth in the number of ], but they still remained underrepresented.{{sfn|Waithe|1995|pp=xix–xxiii}}
* ] and ], whose work in logic and ethics, respectively, provided the tools for early ].
* ] and ], who founded ].
* ] and ], who laid the groundwork for ] and ].


=== Arabic–Persian ===
===20th-century philosophy===
{{Main|Contemporary philosophy}} {{main|Islamic philosophy|Iranian philosophy}}
], one of the most influential philosophers of the ].]]
Within the last century, philosophy has increasingly become a professional discipline practiced within universities, like other academic disciplines. Accordingly, it has become less general and more specialized. In the view of one prominent recent historian: "Philosophy has become a highly organized discipline, done by specialists primarily for other specialists. The number of philosophers has exploded, the volume of publication has swelled, and the subfields of serious philosophical investigation have multiplied. Not only is the broad field of philosophy today far too vast to be embraced by one mind, something similar is true even of many highly specialized subfields."<ref>], ''Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century'', vol. 2, p. 463.</ref>
Arabic–Persian philosophy arose in the early 9th century CE as a response to discussions in the ]. Its classical period lasted until the 12th century CE and was strongly influenced by ancient Greek philosophers. It employed their ideas to elaborate and interpret the teachings of the ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Adamson|Taylor|2004|p=1}} |2={{harvnb|EB Staff|2020}} |3={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=Arabic–Persian Philosophy}} |4={{harvnb|Adamson|2016|pp=5–6}} }}</ref>


] (801–873 CE) is usually regarded as the first philosopher of this tradition. He translated and interpreted many works of Aristotle and Neoplatonists in his attempt to show that there is a harmony between ] and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Esposito|2003|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Nasr|Leaman|2013|loc=11. Al-Kindi}} |3={{harvnb|Nasr|2006|pp=109–110}} |4={{harvnb|Adamson|2020|loc=Lead Section}} }}</ref> ] (980–1037 CE) also followed this goal and developed a comprehensive philosophical system to provide a rational understanding of reality encompassing science, religion, and mysticism.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Gutas|2016}} |2={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=Ibn Sina (Avicenna)}} }}</ref> ] (1058–1111 CE) was a strong critic of the idea that reason can arrive at a true understanding of reality and God. He formulated a detailed ] and tried to assign philosophy a more limited place besides the teachings of the Quran and mystical insight.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Adamson|2016|pp=140–146}} |2={{harvnb|Dehsen|2013|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Griffel|2020|loc=Lead Section, 3. Al-Ghazâlî's "Refutations" of Falsafa and Ismâ’îlism, 4. The Place of Falsafa in Islam}} }}</ref> Following Al-Ghazali and the end of the classical period, the influence of philosophical inquiry waned.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=Ibn Rushd (Averroes)}} |2={{harvnb|Kaminski|2017|p=}} }}</ref> ] (1571–1636 CE) is often regarded as one of the most influential philosophers of the subsequent period.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Rizvi|2021|loc=Lead Section, 3. Metaphysics, 4. Noetics — Epistemology and Psychology}} |2={{harvnb|Chamankhah|2019|p=}} }}</ref> The increasing influence of Western thought and institutions in the 19th and 20th centuries gave rise to the intellectual movement of ], which aims to understand the relation between traditional Islamic beliefs and modernity.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Moaddel|2005|pp=}} |2={{harvnb|Masud|2009|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Safi|2005|loc=}} }}</ref>
In the English-speaking world, ] became the dominant school for much of the 20th century. In the first half of the century, it was a cohesive school, shaped strongly by ], united by the notion that philosophical problems could and should be solved by attention to ] and ]. The pioneering work of ] was a model for the early development of analytic philosophy, moving from a rejection of the idealism dominant in late 19th century British philosophy to an neo-Humean empiricism, strengthened by the conceptual resources of modern mathematical logic.<ref name="stanford">Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, , 1 May 2003: "Russell is generally recognized as one of the founders of modern analytic philosophy. he is regularly credited with being one of the most important logicians of the twentieth century."</ref><ref>Paul Edwards (ed.), ''Encyclopedia of Philosophy'', vol. 7 (Macmillan, 1967), p. 239: "Russell has exercised an influence on the course of Anglo-American philosophy in the twentieth century second to that of no other individual."</ref><ref>Thomas Baldwin (ed.), ''The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945'' (Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 376: " the three greatest European philosophers of the twentieth century—Heidegger, Russell, and Wittgenstein."</ref> In the latter half of the 20th century, ] diffused into a wide variety of disparate philosophical views, only loosely united by historical lines of influence and a self-identified commitment to clarity and rigor. The post-war transformation of the analytic program led in two broad directions: on one hand, an interest in ordinary language as a way of avoiding or redescribing traditional philosophical problems, and on the other, a more thoroughgoing ] that sought to dissolve the puzzles of modern philosophy via the results of the natural sciences (such as cognitive psychology and evolutionary biology). The shift in the work of ], from a view congruent with logical positivism to a therapeutic dissolution of traditional philosophy as a linguistic misunderstanding of normal forms of life, was the most influential version of the first direction in analytic philosophy.<ref>Avrum Stroll, ''Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy'' (Columbia University Press, 2000), p. 252: "More than any other analytic philosopher, has changed the thinking of a whole generation."</ref><ref> in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: "Ludwig Wittgenstein is one of the most influential philosophers of the twentieth century, and regarded by some as the most important since Immanuel Kant."</ref> The later work of Russell and the philosophy of ] are influential exemplars of the naturalist approach dominant in the second half of the 20th century.<ref>Thomas Baldwin, ''Contemporary Philosophy'' (Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 90: " has been, without question, the most influential American philosopher of the second half of the twentieth century."</ref><ref>Peter Hylton, "Quine", in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: "Quine's work has been extremely influential and has done much to shape the course of philosophy in the second-half of the twentieth century and into the twenty-first."</ref><ref>Andrew Bailey, ''First Philosophy: Knowledge and Reality'' (Broadview Press, 2004), p. 274: "Willard Van Orman Quine (1908–2000) was uncontroversially one of the most important philosophers of the twentieth century."</ref><ref>Anthony Kenny, ''Philosophy in the Modern World'' (Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 64: "After Wittgenstein's death many people regarded W.V.O. Quine (1908–2000) as the doyen of Anglophone philosophy."</ref> But the diversity of analytic philosophy from the 1970s onward defies easy generalization: the naturalism of Quine and his epigoni was in some precincts superseded by a "new metaphysics" of ], as in the influential work of ].<ref>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy : "David Lewis (1941–2001) was one of the most important philosophers of the 20th Century. He made significant contributions to philosophy of language, philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of science, decision theory, epistemology, meta-ethics and aesthetics. In most of these fields he is essential reading; in many of them he is among the most important figures of recent decades. And this list leaves out his two most significant contributions."</ref><ref>], ], ] (eds.), ''Introduction to Philosophy: Classical and Contemporary Readings'', 4th ed. (Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 302: "David Lewis (1941–2001) was one of the most important philosophers of the twentieth century."</ref> Recently, the ] movement has sought to reappraise philosophical problems through social science research techniques.


=== Indian ===
On continental Europe, no single school or temperament enjoyed dominance. The flight of the logical positivists from central Europe during the 1930s and 1940s, however, diminished philosophical interest in natural science, and an emphasis on the humanities, broadly construed, figures prominently in what is usually called "]". 20th century movements such as ], ], modern ], ], ], and ] are included within this loose category. The founder of phenomenology, ], sought to study consciousness as experienced from a first-person perspective,<ref>, in ''The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'': "Edmund Husserl was the principal founder of phenomenology—and thus one of the most influential philosophers of the 20th century."</ref><ref>, in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: "he is arguably one of the most important and influential philosophers of the twentieth century."</ref> while ] drew on the ideas of Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, and Husserl to propose an unconventional ] approach to ].<ref>Raymond Geuss, in Thomas Baldwin (ed.), ''The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945'' (Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 497: "Heidegger is by a wide margin the single most influential philosopher of the twentieth century."</ref><ref>, in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: "Martin Heidegger is widely acknowledged to be one of the most original and important philosophers of the 20th century".</ref>
{{main|Indian philosophy}}


] developed the ] view of ], stating that the existence of a plurality of distinct entities is an ].]]
==Eastern philosophy==
{{Main|Eastern philosophy}}
Many societies have considered philosophical questions and built philosophical traditions based upon each other's works. '']'' is a term which can refer broadly to all such traditions that originated or were popular in ], including ], ], ], ], ], and the ]. Or, using a stricter meaning for "philosophy", it can refer to the eastern part of the region where ]s and ] interacted, including the Middle East and the areas where ] and ] are traditional. For example ] is referred to as both Eastern and Western in different contexts{{Citation needed|date=October 2008}}. Eastern philosophical traditions, and various traditions also, have influenced Western philosophers.{{Citation needed|date=February 2009}}


One of the distinguishing features of Indian philosophy is that it integrates the exploration of the nature of reality, the ways of arriving at knowledge, and the ] question of how to reach ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Smart|2008|p=3}} |2={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=Indian Philosophy}} }}</ref> It started around 900 BCE when the ] were written. They are the foundational scriptures of ] and contemplate issues concerning the relation between the ] and ] as well as the question of how ] are reborn based on their ].<ref>{{multiref|{{harvnb|Perrett|2016|loc=Indian philosophy: A Brief Historical Overview, the Ancient Period of Indian Philosophy}}|{{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=Indian Philosophy}}|{{harvnb|Pooley|Rothenbuhler|2016|p=}}|{{harvnb|Andrea|Overfield|2015|p=}}}}</ref> This period also saw the emergence of non-Vedic teachings, like ] and ].<ref name="auto1">{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Perrett|2016|loc=The Ancient Period of Indian Philosophy}} |2={{harvnb|Ruether|2004|p=}} }}</ref> Buddhism was founded by ] (563–483 BCE), who challenged the Vedic idea of a ] and proposed ] to liberate oneself from ].<ref name="auto1"/> Jainism was founded by ] (599–527 BCE), who emphasized ] as well as respect toward all forms of life.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Perrett|2016|loc=The Ancient Period of Indian Philosophy}} |2={{harvnb|Vallely|2012|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Gorisse|2023|loc=Lead Section}} }}</ref>
===Babylonian philosophy===
{{further|]}}
The origins of ]n philosophy can be traced back to the wisdom of early ], which embodied certain philosophies of life, particularly ], in the forms of ], ]s, ], ], ]s, ], ], and ]s. The ] and ] of the Babylonians developed beyond ] observation.<ref>Giorgio Buccellati (1981), "Wisdom and Not: The Case of Mesopotamia", ''Journal of the American Oriental Society'' '''101''' (1), p. 35-47.</ref> The Babylonian text ''Dialog of Pessimism'' contains similarities to the ] thought of the ], the ] doctrine of contrasts, and the dialogues of ], as well as a precursor to the ] ] of ] and Plato.<ref>Giorgio Buccellati (1981), "Wisdom and Not: The Case of Mesopotamia", ''Journal of the American Oriental Society'' '''101''' (1), p. 35-47 .</ref> The ] philosopher ] is also traditionally said to have studied philosophy in Mesopotamia.


The subsequent classical period started roughly 200 BCE{{efn|The exact periodization is disputed with some sources suggesting it started as early as 500 BCE, while others argue it began as late as 200 CE.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Phillips|1998|p=}} | {{harvnb|Perrett|2016|loc=Indian Philosophy: A Brief Historical Overview}} | {{harvnb|Glenney|Silva|2019|p=}} }}</ref>}} and was characterized by the emergence of the six ]: ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Perrett|2016|loc=Indian Philosophy: A Brief Historical Overview, The Classical Period of Indian Philosophy, The Medieval Period of Indian Philosophy}} |2={{harvnb|Glenney|Silva|2019|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Adamson|Ganeri|2020|pp=}} }}</ref> The school of ] developed later in this period. It was systematized by ] ({{circa|700}}–750 CE), who held that ] and that the impression of a universe consisting of many distinct entities is an ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Perrett|2016|loc=The Medieval Period of Indian Philosophy}} |2={{harvnb|Dalal|2021|loc=Lead Section, 2. Metaphysics}} |3={{harvnb|Menon|loc=Lead Section}} }}</ref> A slightly different perspective was defended by ] (1017–1137 CE),{{efn|These dates are traditionally cited but some recent scholars suggest that his life ran from 1077 to 1157.{{sfn|Ranganathan|loc=1. Rāmānuja's Life and Works}}}} who founded the school of ] and argued that individual entities are real as aspects or parts of the underlying unity.{{sfn|Ranganathan|loc=Lead Section, 2c. Substantive Theses}} He also helped to popularize the ], which taught ] as a spiritual path and lasted until the 17th to 18th centuries CE.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Ranganathan|loc=4. Rāmānuja's Soteriology}} |2={{harvnb|Kulke|Rothermund|1998|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Seshadri|1996|p=}} |4={{harvnb|Jha|2022|p=}} }}</ref> The modern period began roughly 1800 CE and was shaped by encounters with Western thought.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Perrett|2016|loc=Indian Philosophy: A Brief Historical Overview, the Modern Period of Indian Philosophy}} |2={{harvnb|EB Staff|2023}} }}</ref> Philosophers tried to formulate comprehensive systems to harmonize diverse philosophical and religious teachings. For example, ] (1863–1902 CE) used the teachings of Advaita Vedanta to argue that all the different religions are valid paths toward the one divine.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Banhatti|1995|pp=}} |2={{harvnb|Bilimoria|2018|pp=529–531}} |3={{harvnb|Rambachan|1994|pp=}} }}</ref>
===Chinese philosophy===
], illustrated in ''Myths & Legends of China'', 1922, by E.T.C. Werner.]]
{{Main|Chinese philosophy}}
Philosophy has had a tremendous effect on ], and ] as a whole. Many of the great philosophical schools were formulated during the ] and ], and came to be known as the ]. The four most influential of these were ], ], ], and ]. Later on, during the ], ] from ] also became a prominent philosophical and religious discipline. (It should be noted that philosophy and religion were clearly distinguished in the West, whilst these concepts were more continuous in the East due to, for example, the philosophical concepts of Buddhism.) Similarly to ], ] also covers a broad and complex range of thought, possessing a multitude of schools that address every branch and subject area of philosophy.
{{Dablink|See also: ], ], ], ], ].}}
{{Dablink|Related Topics: ], ], ], ], ].}}


===Indian philosophy=== === Chinese ===
{{main|Chinese philosophy}}
<!--Deleted image removed: ]'', one of the major schools of Hindu philosophy.]]-->
{{Main|Indian philosophy}}
{{See|Hindu philosophy|Buddhist philosophy|Jain philosophy|Upanishads}}
The term '''Indian philosophy''' (Sanskrit: ''Darshanas''), may refer to any of several traditions of ] that originated in the ], including ], ], and ]. Having the same or rather intertwined origins, all of these philosophies have a common underlying theme of ], and similarly attempt to explain the attainment of emancipation. They have been formalized and promulgated chiefly between 1000 BC to a few centuries AD, with residual commentaries and reformations continuing up to as late as the 20th century by ] and ] among others, who provided stylized interpretations.


] on ethics and society shaped subsequent Chinese philosophy.]]
In the history of the ], following the establishment of a ] culture, the development of philosophical and religious thought over a period of two millennia gave rise to what came to be called the six schools of '']'', or orthodox, Indian or Hindu philosophy. These schools have come to be synonymous with the greater religion of ], which was a development of the early ].


Chinese philosophy is particularly interested in practical questions associated with right social conduct, government, and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Smart|2008|pp=3, 70–71}} |2={{harvnb|EB Staff|2017|loc=Lead Section, § Periods of Development of Chinese Philosophy}} |3={{harvnb|Littlejohn|2023}} |4={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=Chinese Philosophy}} |5={{harvnb|Cua|2009|pp=43–45}} |6={{harvnb|Wei-Ming|loc=Lead Section}} }}</ref> Many ] emerged in the 6th century BCE in competing attempts to resolve the political turbulence of that period. The most prominent among them were ] and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Perkins|2013|pp=}} |2={{harvnb|Ma|2015|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Botz-Bornstein|2023|p=}} }}</ref> Confucianism was founded by ] (551–479 BCE). It focused on different forms of moral ]s and explored how they lead to harmony in society.<ref>{{multiref|{{harvnb|EB Staff|2017|loc=Lead Section, § Periods of Development of Chinese Philosophy}}|{{harvnb|Smart|2008|pp=70–76}}|{{harvnb|Littlejohn|2023|loc=1b. Confucius (551–479 B.C.E.) of the Analects}}|{{harvnb|Boyd|Timpe|2021|pp=}}|{{harvnb|Marshev|2021|pp=}}}}</ref> Daoism was founded by ] (6th century BCE) and examined how humans can live in harmony with nature by following the ] or the natural order of the universe.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|EB Staff|2017|loc=Lead Section, § Periods of Development of Chinese Philosophy}} |2={{harvnb|Slingerland|2007|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=Chinese Philosophy}} }}</ref> Other influential early schools of thought were ], which developed an early form of altruistic ],<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=Chinese Philosophy}} |2={{harvnb|Littlejohn|2023|loc=1c. Mozi (c. 470–391 B.C.E.) and Mohism}} |3={{harvnb|Defoort|Standaert|2013|p=}} }}</ref> and ], which emphasized the importance of a strong state and strict laws.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=Chinese Philosophy}} |2={{harvnb|Kim|2019|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Littlejohn|2023|loc=2a. Syncretic Philosophies in the Qin and Han Periods}} }}</ref>
Hindu philosophy constitutes an integral part of the culture of ], and is the first of the ] philosophies that were influential throughout the ]. The great diversity in thought and practice of Hinduism is nurtured by its liberal ].


Buddhism was introduced to China in the 1st century CE and diversified into ].<ref name="auto">{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Littlejohn|2023|loc=§ Early Buddhism in China}} |2={{harvnb|EB Staff|2017|loc=§ Periods of Development of Chinese Philosophy}} }}</ref> Starting in the 3rd century CE, the school of ] emerged. It interpreted earlier Daoist works with a specific emphasis on metaphysical explanations.<ref name="auto"/> ] developed in the 11th century CE. It systematized previous Confucian teachings and sought a metaphysical foundation of ethics.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Littlejohn|2023|loc=4b. Neo-Confucianism: The Original Way of Confucius for a New Era}} |2={{harvnb|EB Staff|2017|loc=§ Periods of Development of Chinese Philosophy}} }}</ref> The modern period in Chinese philosophy began in the early 20th century and was shaped by the influence of and reactions to Western philosophy. The emergence of ]—which focused on ], ], and ]—resulted in a significant transformation of the political landscape.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Littlejohn|2023|loc=5. The Chinese and Western Encounter in Philosophy}} |2={{harvnb|Jiang|2009|pp=473–480}} |3={{harvnb|Qi|2014|pp=}} |4={{harvnb|Tian|2009|pp=512–513}} }}</ref> Another development was the emergence of ], which aims to modernize and rethink Confucian teachings to explore their compatibility with democratic ideals and modern science.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Van Norden|2022|loc=}} |2={{harvnb|Redse|2015|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Makeham|2003|pp=}} }}</ref>
===Persian philosophy===
{{Main|Iranian philosophy}}
Persian philosophy can be traced back as far as Old Iranian philosophical traditions and thoughts, with their ancient ] roots. These were considerably influenced by ]'s teachings. Throughout Iranian history and due to remarkable political and social influences such as the ], the ], and the ] of Persia, a wide spectrum of schools of thought arose. These espoused a variety of views on philosophical questions, extending from Old Iranian and mainly ]-influenced traditions to schools appearing in the late pre-Islamic era, such as ] and ], as well as various post-Islamic schools. Iranian philosophy after Arab invasion of ] is characterized by different interactions with the ], the ] and with the development of ]. The ] and the ] are regarded as two of the main philosophical traditions of that era in Persia. Zoroastrianism has been identified as one of the key early events in the development of philosophy.<ref name="Blackburn">{{cite book |title=The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy |author=Blackburn, Simon |year=1994 |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press}}</ref>


===Japanese philosophy=== === Other traditions ===
Traditional Japanese philosophy assimilated and synthesized ideas from different traditions, including the indigenous ] religion and Chinese and Indian thought in the forms of Confucianism and Buddhism, both of which entered Japan in the 6th and 7th centuries. Its practice is characterized by active interaction with reality rather than disengaged examination.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Kasulis|2022|loc=Lead Section, § 3.2 Confucianism, § 3.3 Buddhism}} |2={{harvnb|Kasulis|1998|loc=Lead Section}} }}</ref> Neo-Confucianism became an influential school of thought in the 16th century and the following ] and prompted a greater focus on language and the natural world.<ref>{{multiref|{{harvnb|Kasulis|2022|loc=§ 4.3 Edo-period Philosophy (1600–1868)}}|{{harvnb|Kasulis|1998|loc=Lead Section}} }}</ref> The ] emerged in the 20th century and integrated Eastern spirituality with Western philosophy in its exploration of concepts like absolute nothingness (''zettai-mu''), place (''basho''), and the ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Davis|2022|loc=Lead Section, § 3. Absolute Nothingness: Giving Philosophical Form to the Formless}} |2={{harvnb|Kasulis|2022|loc=§ 4.4.2 Modern Academic Philosophies}} }}</ref>
{{Main|Japanese philosophy}}


Latin American philosophy in the ] was practiced by indigenous civilizations and explored questions concerning the nature of reality and the role of humans.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Gracia|Vargas|2018|loc=Lead Section, § 1. History}} |2={{harvnb|Stehn|loc=Lead Section, § 1. Indigenous Period}} |3={{harvnb|Maffie}}}}</ref> It has similarities to ], which covered themes such as the interconnectedness of all things.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Arola|2011|pp=}} |2={{harvnb|Rivera Berruz|2019|p=72}} }}</ref> Latin American philosophy during the ], starting around 1550, was dominated by religious philosophy in the form of ]. Influential topics in the post-colonial period were ], the ], and the exploration of identity and culture.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Gracia|Vargas|2018|loc=Lead Section, § 1. History}} |2={{harvnb|Stehn|loc=Lead Section, § 4. Twentieth Century}} }}</ref>
===Korean philosophy===
{{Main|Korean philosophy}}


Early African philosophy was primarily conducted and transmitted orally. It focused on community, morality, and ancestral ideas, encompassing folklore, wise sayings, religious ideas, and philosophical concepts like ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Grayling|2019|loc=African Philosophy}} |2={{harvnb|Chimakonam|2023|loc=Lead Section, 6. Epochs in African Philosophy}} |3={{harvnb|Mangena|loc=Lead Section}} }}</ref> Systematic African philosophy emerged at the beginning of the 20th century. It discusses topics such as ], ], ], Marxism, ], the role of cultural identity, ], ], and the critique of ].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Chimakonam|2023|loc=Lead Section, 1. Introduction, 5. The Movements in African Philosophy, 6. Epochs in African Philosophy}} | {{harvnb|Bell|Fernback|2015|p=}} | {{harvnb|Coetzee|Roux|1998|pp=}} | {{harvnb|Wiredu|2005|p=12}} | {{harvnb|Chimakonam|Ogbonnaya|2021}} }}</ref>
==Main theories==
===Realism and nominalism===
{{Main|Philosophical realism|Nominalism}}
'']'' sometimes means the position opposed to the 18th-century ], namely that some things have real existence outside the mind. Its standard meaning is the doctrine that abstract entities corresponding to universal terms like "man" or "table" or "red" actually exist (e.g. for Plato in a separate realm of ideas). It is opposed to ], the view that abstract or universal terms are words only, or denote mental states such as ideas, beliefs, or intentions. The latter position, developed by ] and famously held by ], is called ].


== Core branches ==
===Rationalism and empiricism===
{{See also|Outline of philosophy#Branches of philosophy|Outline of philosophy#Philosophical schools of thought}}
{{Main|Rationalism|Empiricism}}
]]]
''Rationalism'' is any view emphasizing the role or importance of human reason. Extreme rationalism tries to base all knowledge on reason alone. Rationalism typically starts from premises that cannot coherently be denied, then attempts by logical steps to deduce every possible object of knowledge.


Philosophical questions can be grouped into several branches. These groupings allow philosophers to focus on a set of similar topics and interact with other thinkers who are interested in the same questions. Epistemology, ethics, logic, and metaphysics are sometimes listed as the main branches.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Brenner|1993|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Palmquist|2010|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Jenicek|2018|p=}} }}</ref> There are many other subfields besides them and the different divisions are neither exhaustive nor mutually exclusive. For example, political philosophy, ethics, and ] are sometimes linked under the general heading of ] as they investigate ] or evaluative aspects.{{sfn|Schroeder|2021|loc=Lead Section: "In its broadest sense, 'value theory' is a catch-all label used to encompass all branches of moral philosophy, social and political philosophy, aesthetics, and sometimes feminist philosophy and the philosophy of religion – whatever areas of philosophy are deemed to encompass some 'evaluative' aspect."}} Furthermore, philosophical inquiry sometimes overlaps with other disciplines in the natural and social sciences, religion, and mathematics.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Kenny|2018|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Lazerowitz|Ambrose|2012|pp=}} }}</ref>
The first rationalist, in this broad sense, is often held to be ] (fl. 500 BC), who argued that it is impossible to doubt that thinking actually occurs. But thinking must have an object, therefore something ''beyond'' thinking really exists. Parmenides deduced that what really exists must have certain properties—for example, that it cannot come into existence or cease to exist, that it is a coherent whole, that it remains the same eternally (in fact, exists altogether outside time). This is known as the ]. ] (born c. 495 BC) was a disciple of Parmenides, and argued that motion is impossible, since the assertion that it exists implies a contradiction (see ]).


=== Epistemology ===
] (427–347 BC) was also influenced by Parmenides, but combined rationalism with a form of ]. The philosopher's work is to consider being, and the essence (]) of things. But the characteristic of essences is that they are universal. The nature of a man, a triangle, a tree, applies to all men, all triangles, all trees. Plato argued that these essences are mind-independent "]", that humans (but particularly philosophers) can come to know by reason, and by ignoring the distractions of sense-perception.
{{Main|Epistemology}}
Epistemology is the branch of philosophy that studies knowledge. It is also known as ''theory of knowledge'' and aims to understand what knowledge is, how it arises, what its limits are, and what value it has. It further examines the nature of ], ], ], and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Martinich|Stroll|2023|loc=Lead Section, The Nature of Epistemology}} |2={{harvnb|Steup|Neta|2020|loc=Lead Section}} |3={{harvnb|Truncellito|loc=Lead Section}} |4={{harvnb|Greco|2021|loc=Article Summary}} }}</ref> Some of the questions addressed by epistemologists include "By what method(s) can one acquire knowledge?"; "How is truth established?"; and "Can we prove causal relations?"{{sfn|Mulvaney|2009|p=ix}}


Epistemology is primarily interested in ] or knowledge of facts, like knowing that Princess Diana died in 1997. But it also investigates ], such as knowing how to ride a bicycle, and ], for example, knowing a celebrity personally.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Steup|Neta|2020|loc=Lead Section, 2. What Is Knowledge?}} |2={{harvnb|Truncellito|loc=Lead Section, 1. Kinds of Knowledge}} |3={{harvnb|Colman|2009a|loc=}} }}</ref>
Modern rationalism begins with ]. Reflection on the nature of perceptual experience, as well as scientific discoveries in physiology and optics, led Descartes (and also ]) to the view that we are directly aware of ideas, rather than objects. This view gave rise to three questions:


One area in epistemology is the '']''. It assumes that declarative knowledge is a combination of different parts and attempts to identify what those parts are. An influential theory in this area claims that knowledge has three components: it is a ''belief'' that is ''justified'' and ''true''. This theory is controversial and the difficulties associated with it are known as the ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Martinich|Stroll|2023|loc=The Nature of Knowledge}} |2={{harvnb|Truncellito|loc=Lead Section, 2. The Nature of Propositional Knowledge}} }}</ref> Alternative views state that knowledge requires additional components, like the absence of luck; different components, like the manifestation of ] instead of justification; or they deny that knowledge can be analyzed in terms of other phenomena.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Ichikawa|Steup|2018|loc=}} |2={{harvnb|Truncellito|loc=§ 2d. The Gettier Problem}} }}</ref>
# Is an idea a true copy of the real thing that it represents? Sensation is not a direct interaction between bodily objects and our sense, but is a physiological process involving representation (for example, an image on the retina). Locke thought that a "secondary quality" such as a sensation of green could in no way resemble the arrangement of particles in matter that go to produce this sensation, although he thought that "primary qualities" such as shape, size, number, were really in objects.
# How can physical objects such as chairs and tables, or even physiological processes in the brain, give rise to mental items such as ideas? This is part of what became known as the ].
# If all the contents of awareness are ideas, how can we know that anything exists apart from ideas?


Another area in epistemology asks how people acquire knowledge. Often-discussed sources of knowledge are ], ], ], ], and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Steup|Neta|2020|loc=5. Sources of Knowledge and Justification}} |2={{harvnb|Truncellito|loc=Lead Section, 4a. Sources of Knowledge}} }}</ref> According to ], all knowledge is based on some form of experience. Rationalists reject this view and hold that some forms of knowledge, like ], are not acquired through experience.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Hetherington|loc=}} |2={{harvnb|Blackburn|2008|loc=}} |3={{harvnb|Blackburn|2008|loc=}} }}</ref> The ] is a common issue in relation to the sources of knowledge and the justification they offer. It is based on the idea that beliefs require some kind of reason or evidence to be justified. The problem is that the source of justification may itself be in need of another source of justification. This leads to an ] or ]. ]s avoid this conclusion by arguing that some sources can provide justification without requiring justification themselves.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Steup|Neta|2020|loc=4. The Structure of Knowledge and Justification}} |2={{harvnb|Truncellito|loc=3. The Nature of Justification}} }}</ref> Another solution is presented by ]s, who state that a belief is justified if it coheres with other beliefs of the person.{{sfn|Olsson|2021|loc=Lead Section, § 1. Coherentism Versus Foundationalism}}
Descartes tried to address the last problem by reason. He began, echoing Parmenides, with a principle that he thought could not coherently be denied: I ''think'', therefore I ''am'' (often given in his original Latin: '']''). From this principle, Descartes went on to construct a complete system of knowledge (which involves proving the existence of God, using, among other means, a version of the ]). His view that reason alone could yield substantial truths about reality strongly influenced those philosophers usually considered modern rationalists (such as ], ], and ]), while provoking criticism from other philosophers who have retrospectively come to be grouped together as empiricists.


Many discussions in epistemology touch on the topic of ], which raises doubts about some or all claims to knowledge. These doubts are often based on the idea that knowledge requires absolute certainty and that humans are unable to acquire it.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Steup|Neta|2020|loc=6. The Limits of Cognitive Success}} |2={{harvnb|Truncellito|loc=4. The Extent of Human Knowledge}} |3={{harvnb|Johnstone|1991|p=}} }}</ref>
], in contrast to rationalism, downplays or dismisses the ability of reason alone to yield knowledge of the world, preferring to base any knowledge we have on our senses. This dates back to the concept of '']'' (unscribed tablet) implicit in ]'s '']'', described more explicitly in ]'s '']'',<ref name=Rizvi>Sajjad H. Rizvi (2006), , '']''</ref> and demonstrated in ]'s '']'' as a ].<ref name=Russell>G. A. Russell (1994), ''The 'Arabick' Interest of the Natural Philosophers in Seventeenth-Century England'', pp. 224–62, ], ISBN 90-04-09459-8</ref> Modern empiricism was notably expounded by ], ] in '']'' in 1689, and ].


=== Ethics ===
During this era, religious ideas played a mixed role in the struggles that preoccupied secular philosophy. ]'s famous ] refutation of key tenets of ] is a case of an Enlightenment philosopher who drew substantially from religious ideas. Other influential religious thinkers of the time include ], ], ], and ]. Other major writers, such as ] and ], took a rather different path.{{clarify|date=January 2011}}
{{Main|Ethics}}
], '']'' (1863){{sfn|Mill|1863|p=}}]]


Ethics, also known as moral philosophy, studies what constitutes right ]. It is also concerned with the moral ] of character traits and institutions. It explores what the standards of ] are and how to live a good life.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Audi|2006|pp=325–326}} |2={{harvnb|Nagel|2006|pp=379–380}} |3={{harvnb|Lambert|2023|p=}} }}</ref> Philosophical ethics addresses such basic questions as "Are moral obligations relative?"; "Which has priority: well-being or obligation?"; and "What gives life meaning?"{{sfn|Mulvaney|2009|pp=vii–xi}}
===Skepticism===
{{Main|Skepticism}}
''Skepticism'' is a philosophical attitude that, in its most extreme form, questions the possibility of obtaining ''any'' sort of knowledge. It was first articulated by ], who believed that everything could be doubted except ''appearances''. ] (2nd century AD), skepticism's most prominent advocate, describes it as an
<blockquote>"ability to place in antithesis, in any manner whatever, appearances and judgments, and thus&nbsp;... to come first of all to a suspension of judgment and then to mental tranquility."<ref>Sextus Empiricus, ''PH'' (= ''Outlines of Pyrrhonism'') I.8</ref></blockquote>


The main branches of ethics are ], ], and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Dittmer|loc=1. Applied Ethics as Distinct from Normative Ethics and Metaethics}} |2={{harvnb|Jeanes|2019|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Nagel|2006|pp=379–380}} }}</ref> Meta-ethics asks abstract questions about the nature and sources of morality. It analyzes the meaning of ethical concepts, like ''right action'' and '']''. It also investigates whether ethical theories can be ] and how to acquire knowledge of them.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Dittmer|loc=1. Applied Ethics as Distinct from Normative Ethics and Metaethics}} |2={{harvnb|Jeanes|2019|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Nagel|2006|pp=390–391}} |4={{harvnb|Sayre-McCord|2023|loc=Lead Section}} }}</ref> Normative ethics encompasses general theories of how to distinguish between right and wrong conduct. It helps guide moral decisions by examining what moral obligations and rights people have. Applied ethics studies the consequences of the general theories developed by normative ethics in specific situations, for example, in the workplace or for medical treatments.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Dittmer|loc=1. Applied Ethics as Distinct from Normative Ethics and Metaethics}} |2={{harvnb|Barsky|2009|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Jeanes|2019|p=}} |4={{harvnb|Nagel|2006|pp=379–380, 390–391}} }}</ref>
Skepticism so conceived is not merely the use of doubt, but is the use of doubt for a particular end: a calmness of the soul, or '']''. Skepticism poses itself as a challenge to ], whose adherents think they have found the truth.<ref>Sextus Empiricus, ''PH'' (= ''Outlines of Pyrrhonism'') I.19–20</ref>


Within contemporary normative ethics, consequentialism, ], and ] are influential schools of thought.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Dittmer|loc=1. Applied Ethics as Distinct from Normative Ethics and Metaethics}} |2={{harvnb|Nagel|2006|pp=382, 386–388}} }}</ref> ''Consequentialists'' judge actions based on their consequences. One such view is ], which argues that actions should increase overall happiness while minimizing suffering. ''Deontologists'' judge actions based on whether they follow moral duties, such as abstaining from lying or killing. According to them, what matters is that actions are in tune with those duties and not what consequences they have. ''Virtue theorists'' judge actions based on how the moral character of the agent is expressed. According to this view, actions should conform to what an ideally virtuous agent would do by manifesting virtues like ] and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Dittmer|loc=1. Applied Ethics as Distinct from Normative Ethics and Metaethics}} |2={{harvnb|Nagel|2006|pp=382, 386–388}} |3={{harvnb|Hursthouse|Pettigrove|2022|loc=1.2 Practical Wisdom}} }}</ref>
Sextus noted that the reliability of perception may always be questioned, because it is idiosyncratic to the perceiver. The appearance of individual things changes depending on whether they are in a group: for example, the shavings of a goat's horn are white when taken alone, yet the intact horn is black. A pencil, when viewed lengthwise, looks like a stick; but when examined at the tip, it looks merely like a circle.


=== Logic ===
Skepticism was revived in the early modern period by ] and ]. Its most extreme exponent, however, was ]. Hume argued that there are only two kinds of reasoning: what he called ''probable'' and ''demonstrative'' (cf. ]). Neither of these two forms of reasoning can lead us to a reasonable belief in the continued existence of an external world. Demonstrative reasoning cannot do this, because demonstration (that is, ] from well-founded premises) alone cannot establish the uniformity of nature (as captured by scientific laws and principles, for example). Such reason alone cannot establish that the future will resemble the past. We have certain beliefs about the world (that the sun will rise tomorrow, for example), but these beliefs are the product of habit and custom, and do not depend on any sort of logical inferences from what is already given ''certain''. But ''probable'' reasoning (]), which aims to take us from the observed to the unobserved, cannot do this either: it ''also'' depends on the uniformity of nature, and this supposed uniformity cannot be proved, without circularity, by any appeal to uniformity. The best that either sort of reasoning can accomplish is conditional truth: ''if'' certain assumptions are true, ''then'' certain conclusions follow. So nothing about the world can be established with certainty. Hume concludes that there is no solution to the skeptical argument—except, in effect, to ignore it.<ref>"And though a Pyrrhonian may throw himself or others into a momentary amazement and confusion by his profound reasonings; the first and most trivial event in life will put to flight all his doubts and scruples, and leave him the same, in every point of action and speculation, with the philosophers of every other sect, or with those who never concerned themselves in any philosophical researches. When he awakes from his dream, he will be the first to join in the laugh against himself, and to confess, that all his objections are mere amusement." (''An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding'', 1777, XII, Part 2, p. 128)</ref>
{{Main|Logic}}


Logic is the study of ]. It aims to understand how to distinguish good from bad ]s.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Hintikka|2019}} |2={{harvnb|Haack|1978|loc=Philosophy of Logics}} }}</ref> It is usually divided into formal and ]. Formal logic uses ] with a precise symbolic representation to investigate arguments. In its search for exact criteria, it examines the structure of arguments to determine whether they are correct or incorrect. Informal logic uses non-formal criteria and standards to assess the correctness of arguments. It relies on additional factors such as content and context.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Blair|Johnson|2000|pp=94–96}} |2={{harvnb|Walton|1996}} |3={{harvnb|Tully|2005|p=532}} |4={{harvnb|Johnson|1999|pp=265–267}} |5={{harvnb|Groarke|2021}} }}</ref>
Even if these matters were resolved in every case, we would have in turn to justify our standard of justification, leading to an ] (hence the term ''regress skepticism'').<ref>{{cite book |title=What the Tortoise Said to Achilles |author=Lewis Carroll |year=1895}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Knowledge Puzzles |author=Stephen Cade Hetherington |year=1996}}</ref>


Logic examines a variety of arguments. ] are mainly studied by formal logic. An argument is deductively ] if the truth of its ]s ensures the truth of its conclusion. Deductively valid arguments follow a ], like '']'', which has the following ]: "''p''; if ''p'' then ''q''; therefore ''q''". An example is the argument "today is Sunday; if today is Sunday then I don't have to go to work today; therefore I don't have to go to work today".<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Velleman|2006|pp=8, 103}} |2={{harvnb|Johnson-Laird|2009|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Dowden|2020|pp=334–336, 432}} }}</ref>
Many philosophers have questioned the value of such skeptical arguments. The question of whether we can achieve knowledge of the external world is based on how high a standard we set for the justification of such knowledge. If our standard is absolute certainty, then we cannot progress beyond the existence of mental sensations. We cannot even deduce the existence of a coherent or continuing "I" that experiences these sensations, much less the existence of an external world. On the other hand, if our standard is too low, then we admit follies and illusions into our body of knowledge. This argument against absolute skepticism asserts that the practical philosopher must move beyond ], and accept a standard for knowledge that is high but not absolute.


The premises of non-deductive arguments also support their conclusion, although this support does not guarantee that the conclusion is true.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Dowden|2020|pp=432, 470}} |2={{harvnb|Anshakov|Gergely|2010|p=}} }}</ref> One form is ]. It starts from a set of individual cases and uses generalization to arrive at a universal law governing all cases. An example is the inference that "all ravens are black" based on observations of many individual black ravens.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Vickers|2022}} |2={{harvnb|Nunes|2011|pp=|loc=Logical Reasoning and Learning}} |3={{harvnb|Dowden|2020|pp=432–449, 470}} }}</ref> Another form is ]. It starts from an observation and concludes that the best explanation of this observation must be true. This happens, for example, when a doctor diagnoses a disease based on the observed symptoms.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Douven|2022}} |2={{harvnb|Koslowski|2017|pp=366–368|loc=Abductive Reasoning and Explanation}} |3={{harvnb|Nunes|2011|pp=|loc=Logical Reasoning and Learning}} }}</ref>
===Idealism===
{{Main|Idealism}}
]]]
Idealism is the epistemological doctrine that nothing can be directly known outside of the minds of thinking beings. Or in an alternative stronger form, it is the metaphysical doctrine that nothing exists apart from minds and the "contents" of minds. In modern Western philosophy, the epistemological doctrine begins as a core tenet of Descartes—that what is in the mind is known more reliably than what is known through the senses. The first prominent modern Western idealist in the metaphysical sense was ]. Berkeley argued<ref>First Dialogue</ref> that there is no deep distinction between mental states, such as feeling pain, and the ideas about so-called "external" things, that appear to us through the senses. There is no real distinction, in this view, between certain sensations of heat and light that we experience, which lead us to believe in the external existence of a fire, and the fire itself. Those sensations are all there is to fire. Berkeley expressed this with the Latin formula ''esse est percipi'': "to be is to be perceived". In this view the opinion, "strangely prevailing upon men", that houses, mountains, and rivers have an existence independent of their perception by a thinking being is false.


Logic also investigates incorrect forms of reasoning. They are called '']'' and are divided into ] and ] based on whether the source of the error lies only in the form of the argument or also in its content and context.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Hansen|2020}} |2={{harvnb|Dowden|2023}} |3={{harvnb|Dowden|2020|p=290}} |4={{harvnb|Vleet|2011|p=}} }}</ref>
Forms of idealism were prevalent in philosophy from the 18th century to the early 20th century. Transcendental idealism, advocated by ], is the view that there are limits on what can be understood, since there is much that cannot be brought under the conditions of objective judgment. Kant wrote his '']'' (1781–1787) in an attempt to reconcile the conflicting approaches of rationalism and empiricism, and to establish a new groundwork for studying metaphysics. Kant's intention with this work was to look at what we know and then consider what must be true about it, as a logical consequence of the ''way'' we know it. One major theme was that there are fundamental features of reality that escape our direct knowledge because of the natural limits of the human faculties.<ref>{{cite book |author=Kant, Immanuel |title=Critique of Pure Reason |publisher= Prometheus Books |year=1990 |isbn= 0-87975-596-2}}</ref> Although Kant held that objective knowledge of the world required the mind to impose a ] or ] on the stream of pure sensory data—a framework including space and time themselves—he maintained that ''things-in-themselves'' existed independently of our perceptions and judgments; he was therefore not an idealist in any simple sense. Indeed, Kant's account of ''things-in-themselves'' is both controversial and highly complex. Continuing his work, ] and ] dispensed with belief in the independent existence of the world, and created a thoroughgoing idealist philosophy.


=== Metaphysics ===
The most notable work of this ] was ]'s '']'', of 1807. Hegel admitted his ideas were not new, but that all the previous philosophies had been incomplete. His goal was to correctly finish their job. Hegel asserts that the twin aims of philosophy are to account for the contradictions apparent in human experience (which arise, for instance, out of the supposed contradictions between "being" and "not being"), and also simultaneously to resolve and preserve these contradictions by showing their compatibility at a higher level of examination ("being" and "not being" are resolved with "becoming"). This program of acceptance and reconciliation of contradictions is known as the "Hegelian ]". Philosophers in the Hegelian tradition include ], who coined the term projection as pertaining to our inability to recognize anything in the external world without projecting qualities of ourselves upon those things; ]; ]; and the ], notably ], ] and ].
{{Main|Metaphysics}}
] in an ] decorated with hand-painted miniatures.]]


Metaphysics is the study of the most general features of ], such as existence, ] and their ], ], ] and ], ], and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|van Inwagen|Sullivan|Bernstein|2023}} |2={{harvnb|Craig|1998}} |3={{harvnb|Audi|2006|loc=§ Metaphysics}} }}</ref> There are disagreements about the precise definition of the term and its meaning has changed throughout the ages.{{sfn|van Inwagen|Sullivan|Bernstein|2023|loc=Lead Section}} Metaphysicians attempt to answer basic questions including "]"; "Of what does reality ultimately consist?"; and "Are humans free?"{{sfn|Mulvaney|2009|pp=ix–x}}
Few 20th century philosophers have embraced idealism. However, quite a few have embraced Hegelian dialectic. Immanuel Kant's "Copernican Turn" also remains an important philosophical concept today.


Metaphysics is sometimes divided into general metaphysics and specific or special metaphysics. General metaphysics investigates being as such. It examines the features that all entities have in common. Specific metaphysics is interested in different kinds of being, the features they have, and how they differ from one another.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|van Inwagen|Sullivan|Bernstein|2023}} |2={{harvnb|Craig|1998}} |3={{harvnb|Gracia|1999|p=}} }}</ref>
===Pragmatism===
{{Main|Pragmatism|Instrumentalism}}
]]]
Pragmatism was founded in the spirit of finding a scientific concept of truth that does not depend on personal insight (revelation) or reference to some metaphysical realm. The truth of a statement should be judged by the effect it has on our actions, and truth should be seen as what the whole of scientific enquiry ultimately agrees on.<ref name="Murphy">{{cite book |title=Pragmatism – from Peirce to Davidson |author=Murphy, John P. |year=1990 |location=Boulder |publisher=Westview Press}}</ref> This should probably be seen as a guiding principle more than a definition of what it means for something to be true, though the details of how this principle should be interpreted have been subject to discussion since Charles S. Peirce first conceived it. Peirce's ] is as follows: "Consider what effects, which might conceivably have practical bearings, we conceive the object of our conception to have. Then, our conception of these effects is the whole of our conceptions of the object."<ref>Peirce on p. 293 of "How to Make Our Ideas Clear", Popular Science Monthly, v. 12, pp. 286–302. Reprinted widely, including Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (CP) v. 5, paragraphs 388–410.</ref> Like ] neo-pragmatist ], many are convinced that pragmatism asserts that the truth of beliefs does not consist in their correspondence with reality, but in their usefulness and efficacy.<ref name="Rorty">{{cite book |title=The Consequences of Pragmatism |author=Rorty, Richard |year=1982 |location=Minnesota |publisher=Minnesota University Press |page=xvi}}</ref>


An important area in metaphysics is ]. Some theorists identify it with general metaphysics. Ontology investigates concepts like ], ], and reality. It studies the ] and asks what exists on the most fundamental level.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Haaparanta|Koskinen|2012|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Fiet|2022|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Audi|2006|loc=§ Metaphysics}} |4={{harvnb|van Inwagen|Sullivan|Bernstein|2023|loc=1. The Word 'Metaphysics' and the Concept of Metaphysics}} }}</ref> Another subfield of metaphysics is ]. It is interested in the essence of the world as a whole. It asks questions including whether the universe has a beginning and an end and whether it was created by something else.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Audi|2006|loc=§ Metaphysics}} |2={{harvnb|Coughlin|2012|p=}} }}</ref>
The late 19th-century ] ] and ] were its co-founders, and it was later developed by ] as ]. Since the usefulness of any belief at any time might be contingent on circumstance, Peirce and James conceptualised final truth as something only established by the future, final settlement of all opinion.<ref name="Putnam">{{cite book |title=Pragmatism: An Open Question |author=Putnam, Hilary |year=1995 |location= Oxford |publisher=Blackwell |pages=8–12}}</ref> Critics have accused pragmatism of falling victim to a simple fallacy: because something that is true proves useful, that usefulness is the basis for its truth.<ref name="Pratt">{{cite book |title=What is Pragmatism? |author=Pratt, J. B. |year=1909 |location=New York |publisher=Macmillan |page=89}}</ref> Thinkers in the pragmatist tradition have included John Dewey, ], ] and ]. Pragmatism has more recently been taken in new directions by Richard Rorty, ], ], ], and ].


A key topic in metaphysics concerns the question of whether reality only consists of physical things like matter and energy. Alternative suggestions are that mental entities (such as ]s and ]s) and ] (such as numbers) exist apart from physical things. Another topic in metaphysics concerns the problem of ]. One question is how much an entity can change while still remaining the same entity.{{sfn|Audi|2006|loc=§ Metaphysics}} According to one view, entities have ] and ]. They can change their accidental features but they cease to be the same entity if they lose an essential feature.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Robertson Ishii|Atkins|2023|loc=}} |2={{harvnb|Espín|Nickoloff|2007|p=}} }}</ref> A central distinction in metaphysics is between ]s and ]. Universals, like the color red, can exist at different locations at the same time. This is not the case for particulars including individual persons or specific objects.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Lowe|2005|p=683}} |2={{harvnb|Kuhlmann|2010|loc=Ontologie: 4.2.1 Einzeldinge und Universalien}} }}</ref> Other metaphysical questions are whether the past ] the present and what implications this would have for the existence of ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Kane|2009|pp=}} |2={{harvnb|Kane|2013|p=}} }}</ref>
===Phenomenology===
{{Main|Phenomenology (philosophy)}}
]'s ] was an ambitious attempt to lay the foundations for an account of the structure of conscious experience in general.<ref name="Ref-1">{{cite book |author=Woodruff Smith, David |title=Husserl |publisher=Routledge |year=2007}}</ref> An important part of Husserl's phenomenological project was to show that all conscious acts are directed at or about objective content, a feature that Husserl called '']''.<ref name=Dreyfus>{{cite book |author=Dreyfus, Hubert |title=A Companion to Phenomenology and Existentialism |publisher=Blackwell |year=2006}}</ref>


=== Other major branches ===
In the first part of his two-volume work, the ''Logical Investigations'' (1901), he launched an extended attack on ]. In the second part, he began to develop the technique of ''descriptive phenomenology'', with the aim of showing how objective judgments are indeed grounded in conscious experience—not, however, in the first-person experience of particular individuals, but in the properties essential to any experiences of the kind in question.<ref name="Ref-1"/>
{{See also|List of philosophies}}
There are many other subfields of philosophy besides its core branches. Some of the most prominent are aesthetics, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, philosophy of religion, philosophy of science, and political philosophy.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Stambaugh|1987|loc=}} |2={{harvnb|Phillips|2010|p=16}} |3={{harvnb|Ramos|2004|p=}} |4={{harvnb|Shand|2004|pp=}} }}</ref>


] in the philosophical sense is the field that studies the nature and appreciation of ] and other aesthetic properties, like ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Smith|Brown|Duncan|2019|p=}} |2={{harvnb|McQuillan|2015|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Janaway|2005|p=9|loc=Aesthetics, History Of}} }}</ref> Although it is often treated together with the ], aesthetics is a broader category that encompasses other aspects of experience, such as natural beauty.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Nanay|2019|p=4}} |2={{harvnb|McQuillan|2015|pp=}} }}</ref> In a more general sense, aesthetics is "critical reflection on art, culture, and ]".<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Kelly|1998|p=ix}} |2={{harvnb|Riedel|1999}} }}</ref> A key question in aesthetics is whether beauty is an objective feature of entities or a subjective aspect of experience.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|McQuillan|2015|pp=}} |2={{harvnb|Sartwell|2022|loc=}} }}</ref> Aesthetic philosophers also investigate the nature of aesthetic experiences and ]. Further topics include the essence of ] and the processes involved in creating them.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Smith|Brown|Duncan|2019|p=}} |2={{harvnb|McQuillan|2015|pp=}} }}</ref>
He also attempted to identify the essential properties of any act of meaning. He developed the method further in ''Ideas'' (1913) as ''transcendental phenomenology'', proposing to ground actual experience, and thus all fields of human knowledge, in the structure of consciousness of an ideal, or ], ego. Later, he attempted to reconcile his transcendental standpoint with an acknowledgement of the intersubjective ] in which real individual subjects interact. Husserl published only a few works in his lifetime, which treat phenomenology mainly in abstract methodological terms; but he left an enormous quantity of unpublished concrete analyses.


The ] studies the nature and function of ]. It examines the concepts of ], ], and truth. It aims to answer questions such as how words are related to things and how language affects human ] and understanding. It is closely related to the disciplines of logic and linguistics.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Audi|2006|loc=§ Philosophy of Language}} |2={{harvnb|Russell|Fara|2013|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Blackburn|2022|loc=Lead Section}} }}</ref> The philosophy of language rose to particular prominence in the early 20th century in ] due to the works of ] and Russell. One of its central topics is to understand how sentences get their meaning. There are two broad theoretical camps: those emphasizing the formal ] of sentences{{efn|The truth conditions of a sentence are the circumstances or states of affairs under which the sentence would be true.{{sfn|Birner|2012|p=}}}} and those investigating circumstances that determine when it is suitable to use a sentence, the latter of which is associated with ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Wolf|2023|loc=§§ 1.a-b, 3–4}} |2={{harvnb|Ifantidou|2014|p=}} }}</ref>
Husserl's work was immediately influential in Germany, with the foundation of phenomenological schools in Munich and Göttingen. Phenomenology later achieved international fame through the work of such philosophers as ] (formerly Husserl's research assistant), ], and ]. Indeed, through the work of Heidegger and Sartre, Husserl's focus on subjective experience influenced aspects of ].


The ] studies the nature of mental phenomena and how they are related to the physical world.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Lowe|2000|pp=}} |2={{harvnb|Crumley|2006|pp=}} }}</ref> It aims to understand different types of ] and ] ], like ]s, ]s, ]s, ]s, ], and free will.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Audi|2006|loc=§ Philosophy of Mind}} |2={{harvnb|Heidemann|2014|p=}} }}</ref> An influential intuition in the philosophy of mind is that there is a distinction between the inner experience of objects and their existence in the external world. The ] is the problem of explaining how these two types of thing—mind and matter—are related. The main traditional responses are ], which assumes that matter is more fundamental; ], which assumes that mind is more fundamental; and ], which assumes that mind and matter are distinct types of entities. In contemporary philosophy, another common view is ], which understands mental states in terms of the functional or causal roles they play.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Heil|2013|pp=1–3, 9, 12–13}} |2={{harvnb|Weir|2023|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Shiraev|2010|pp=}} |4={{harvnb|Polger|loc=Lead Section}} }}</ref> The mind-body problem is closely related to the ], which asks how the physical brain can produce ]<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Heil|2013|pp=1–3, 12–13}} |2={{harvnb|Weisberg|loc=Lead Section, 1. Stating the Problem}} }}</ref>
===Existentialism===
{{Main|Existentialism}}
]]]
Existentialism is a term applied to the work of a number of late 19th- and 20th-century philosophers who, despite profound doctrinal differences,<ref>John Macquarrie, ''Existentialism'', New York (1972), pages 18–21.</ref><ref>''Oxford Companion to Philosophy'', ed. Ted Honderich, New York (1995), page 259.</ref> shared the belief that philosophical thinking begins with the human subject—not merely the thinking subject, but the acting, feeling, living human individual.<ref>John Macquarrie, ''Existentialism'', New York (1972), pages 14–15.</ref> In existentialism, the individual's starting point is characterized by what has been called "the existential attitude", or a sense of disorientation and confusion in the face of an apparently meaningless or absurd world.<ref>Robert C. Solomon, ''Existentialism'' (McGraw-Hill, 1974, pages 1–2)</ref> Many existentialists have also regarded traditional systematic or academic philosophy, in both style and content, as too abstract and remote from concrete human experience.<ref>Ernst Breisach, ''Introduction to Modern Existentialism'', New York (1962), page 5</ref><ref>Walter Kaufmann, ''Existentialism: From Dostoevesky to Sartre'', New York (1956) page 12</ref>


The ] investigates the basic concepts, assumptions, and arguments associated with ]. It critically reflects on what religion is, how to define the ], and whether one or more gods exist. It also includes the discussion of ]s that reject religious doctrines.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Taliaferro|2023|loc=Lead Section, § 5.2}} |2={{harvnb|Burns|2017|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Audi|2006|loc=§ Philosophy of Religion}} |4={{harvnb|Meister|loc=Lead Section}} }}</ref> Further questions addressed by the philosophy of religion are: "How are we to interpret religious language, if not literally?";{{sfn|Taliaferro|2023|loc=§ 1}} "Is divine omniscience compatible with free will?";{{sfn|Taliaferro|2023|loc=§ 5.1.1}} and, "Are the great variety of world religions in some way compatible in spite of their apparently contradictory theological claims?"{{sfn|Taliaferro|2023|loc=§ 6}} It includes topics from nearly all branches of philosophy.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Taliaferro|2023|loc=Introduction}} |2={{harvnb|Audi|2006|loc=§ Philosophy of Religion}} }}</ref> It differs from ] since theological debates typically take place within one religious tradition, whereas debates in the philosophy of religion transcend any particular set of theological assumptions.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Bayne|2018|pp=1–2}} |2={{harvnb|Louth|Thielicke|2014}} }}</ref>
Although they did not use the term, the 19th-century philosophers ] and ] are widely regarded as the fathers of existentialism. Their influence, however, has extended beyond existentialist thought.<ref>{{cite book |author=Matustik, Martin J. |title=Kierkegaard in Post/Modernity |publisher=Indiana University Press |year=1995 |isbn=0-253-20967-6}}</ref><ref name=Bob>{{cite book |author=Solomon, Robert |title=What Nietzsche Really Said |year=2001 |isbn= 0-8052-1094-6 |publisher=Schocken}}</ref><ref>Religious thinkers were among those influenced by Kierkegaard. Christian existentialists include ], ], ], and ] (although he preferred to speak of his "philosophical faith"). The Jewish philosophers ] and ] have also been associated with existentialism.</ref>


The ] examines the fundamental concepts, assumptions, and problems associated with science. It reflects on what science is and how to distinguish it from ]. It investigates the methods employed by scientists, how their application can result in knowledge, and on what assumptions they are based. It also studies the purpose and implications of science.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Audi|2006|loc=§ Philosophy of Science}} |2={{harvnb|Kitcher|2023}} |3={{harvnb|Losee|2001|pp=}} |4={{harvnb|Wei|2020|p=}} |5={{harvnb|Newton-Smith|2000|pp=2–3}}}}</ref> Some of its questions are "What counts as an adequate explanation?";{{sfn|Newton-Smith|2000|pp=7}} "Is a scientific law anything more than a description of a regularity?";{{sfn|Newton-Smith|2000|pp=5}} and "Can some special sciences be explained entirely in the terms of a more general science?"{{sfn|Papineau|2005|pp=855–856}} It is a vast field that is commonly divided into the philosophy of the ] and the philosophy of the ], with further subdivisions for each of the individual sciences under these headings. How these branches are related to one another is also a question in the philosophy of science. Many of its philosophical issues overlap with the fields of metaphysics or epistemology.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Papineau|2005|p=852}} |2={{harvnb|Audi|2006|loc=§ Philosophy of Science}} }}</ref>
The main target of Kierkegaard's writings was the idealist philosophical system of ] which, he thought, ignored or excluded the inner subjective life of living human beings. Kierkegaard, conversely, held that "truth is subjectivity", arguing that what is most important to an actual human being are questions dealing with an individual's inner relationship to existence. In particular, Kierkegaard, a Christian, believed that the truth of religious faith was a subjective question, and one to be wrestled with passionately.<ref>{{cite book |author=Kierkegaard, Søren |title=Fear and Trembling |publisher=Penguin Classics |year=1986 |isbn=0-14-044449-1}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=Kierkegaard, Søren |title=Concluding Unscientific Postscript |publisher=Princeton University Press |year=1992 |isbn=0-691-02081-7}}</ref>


] is the philosophical inquiry into the fundamental principles and ideas governing political systems and societies. It examines the basic concepts, assumptions, and arguments in the field of ]. It investigates the nature and purpose of ] and compares its different forms.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Molefe|Allsobrook|2021|pp=}} |2={{harvnb|Moseley|loc=Lead Section}} |3={{harvnb|Duignan|2012|pp=}} |4={{harvnb|Bowle|Arneson|2023|loc=Lead Section}} |5={{harvnb|McQueen|2010|p=}} }}</ref> It further asks under what circumstances the use of political power is ], rather than a form of simple violence.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Molefe|Allsobrook|2021|pp=}} |2={{harvnb|Howard|2010|p=4}} }}</ref> In this regard, it is concerned with the distribution of political power, social and material goods, and ].{{sfn|Wolff|2006|pp=1–2}} Other topics are ], ], ], ], and ].{{sfn|Molefe|Allsobrook|2021|pp=}} Political philosophy involves a general inquiry into normative matters and differs in this respect from ], which aims to provide empirical descriptions of actually existing states.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Moseley|loc=Lead Section}} |2={{harvnb|Molefe|Allsobrook|2021|pp=}} }}</ref> Political philosophy is often treated as a subfield of ethics.{{sfn|Audi|2006|loc=§ Subfields of Ethics}} Influential schools of thought in political philosophy are ], ], ], and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Moseley|loc=Lead Section, § 3. Political Schools of Thought}} |2={{harvnb|McQueen|2010|p=}} }}</ref>
Although Kierkegaard and Nietzsche were among his influences, the extent to which the German philosopher ] should be considered an existentialist is debatable. In '']'' he presented a method of rooting philosophical explanations in human existence (''Dasein'') to be analysed in terms of existential categories (''existentiale''); and this has led many commentators to treat him as an important figure in the existentialist movement. However, in ''The Letter on Humanism'', Heidegger explicitly rejected the existentialism of ].


== Methods ==
Sartre became the best-known proponent of existentialism, exploring it not only in theoretical works such as '']'', but also in plays and novels. Sartre, along with ], represented an avowedly atheistic branch of existentialism, which is now more closely associated with their ideas of nausea, contingency, bad faith, and the absurd than with Kierkegaard's spiritual angst. Nevertheless, the focus on the individual human being, responsible before the universe for the authenticity of his or her existence, is common to all these thinkers.
{{main|Philosophical methodology}}
Methods of philosophy are ways of conducting philosophical inquiry. They include techniques for arriving at philosophical knowledge and justifying philosophical claims as well as principles used for choosing between competing theories.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|McKeon|2002|loc=}} |2={{harvnb|Overgaard|D'Oro|2017|pp=|loc=Introduction}} |3={{harvnb|Mehrtens|2010|loc=}} }}</ref> A great variety of methods have been employed throughout the history of philosophy. Many of them differ significantly from the methods used in the ] in that they do not use experimental data obtained through measuring equipment.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Daly|2010|loc=|p=9}} |2={{harvnb|Williamson|2020}} |3={{harvnb|Ichikawa|2011}} }}</ref> The choice of one's method usually has important implications both for how philosophical theories are constructed and for the arguments cited for or against them.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Overgaard|D'Oro|2017|pp=|loc=Introduction}} |2={{harvnb|Nado|2017|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Dever|2016|loc=}} }}</ref> This choice is often guided by epistemological considerations about what constitutes philosophical ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Daly|2010|loc=|pp=9–11}} |2={{harvnb|Overgaard|D'Oro|2017|pp=|loc=Introduction}} |3={{harvnb|Dever|2016|pp=|loc=What Is Philosophical Methodology?}} }}</ref>


Methodological disagreements can cause conflicts among philosophical theories or about the answers to philosophical questions. The discovery of new methods has often had important consequences both for how philosophers conduct their research and for what claims they defend.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Daly|2015|pp=|loc=Introduction and Historical Overview}} |2={{harvnb|Mehrtens|2010|loc=}} |3={{harvnb|Overgaard|D'Oro|2017|pp=|loc=Introduction}} }}</ref> Some philosophers engage in most of their theorizing using one particular method while others employ a wider range of methods based on which one fits the specific problem investigated best.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Williamson|2020}} |2={{harvnb|Singer|1974|pp=420–421}} |3={{harvnb|Venturinha|2013|p=}} |4={{harvnb|Walsh|Teo|Baydala|2014|p=}} }}</ref>
===Structuralism and post-structuralism===
{{Main|Structuralism|Post-structuralism}}
]]]
Inaugurated by the linguist ], structuralism sought to clarify systems of signs through analyzing the ]s they both limit and make possible. Saussure conceived of the sign as being delimited by all the other signs in the system, and ideas as being incapable of existence prior to linguistic structure, which articulates thought. This led continental thought away from humanism, and toward what was termed the decentering of man: language is no longer spoken by man to express a true inner self, but language speaks man.


Conceptual analysis is a common method in analytic philosophy. It aims to clarify the meaning of concepts by analyzing them into their component parts.<ref>{{multiref|{{harvnb|Eder|Lawler|van Riel|2020|p=915}}|{{harvnb|Shaffer|2015|pp=}}|{{harvnb|Audi|2006|loc=}}}}</ref> Another method often employed in analytic philosophy is based on ]. It starts with commonly accepted beliefs and tries to draw unexpected conclusions from them, which it often employs in a negative sense to criticize philosophical theories that are too far removed from how the average person sees the issue.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Ichikawa|2011}} |2={{harvnb|Reynolds|2010|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|EB Staff|2007}} }}</ref> It is similar to how ] approaches philosophical questions by investigating how ordinary language is used.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Mehrtens|2010|loc=}} |2={{harvnb|Parker-Ryan|loc=Lead Section, § 1. Introduction}} |3={{harvnb|EB Staff|2022}} }}</ref>
Structuralism sought the province of a hard science, but its positivism soon came under fire by poststructuralism, a wide field of thinkers, some of whom were once themselves structuralists, but later came to criticize it. Structuralists believed they could analyze systems from an external, objective standing, for example, but the poststructuralists argued that this is incorrect, that one cannot transcend structures and thus analysis is itself determined by what it examines, while the distinction between the signifier and signified was treated as crystalline by structuralists, poststructuralists asserted that every attempt to grasp the signified results in more signifiers, so meaning is always in a state of being deferred, making an ultimate interpretation impossible.


] is a thought experiment that investigates the moral difference between doing and allowing harm. This issue is explored in an imaginary situation in which a person can sacrifice a single person by redirecting a trolley to save a group of people.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Woollard|Howard-Snyder|2022|loc=§ 3. The Trolley Problem and the Doing/Allowing Distinction}} |2={{harvnb|Rini|loc=§ 8. Moral Cognition and Moral Epistemology}} }}</ref>]]
Structuralism came to dominate continental philosophy throughout the 1960s and early '70s, encompassing thinkers as diverse as ], ] and ]. Post-structuralism came to predominate over the 1970s onwards, including thinkers such as ], ], ] and even ]; it incorporated a critique of structuralism's limitations.


Various methods in philosophy give particular importance to ]s, that is, non-inferential impressions about the correctness of specific claims or general principles.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Daly|2015|pp=|loc=Introduction and Historical Overview}} |2={{harvnb|Duignan|2009}} }}</ref> For example, they play an important role in ]s, which employ ] to evaluate the possible consequences of an imagined situation. These anticipated consequences can then be used to confirm or refute philosophical theories.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Brown|Fehige|2019|loc=Lead Section}} |2={{harvnb|Goffi|Roux|2011|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Eder|Lawler|van Riel|2020|pp=915–916}} }}</ref> The method of ] also employs intuitions. It seeks to form a ] position on a certain issue by examining all the relevant beliefs and intuitions, some of which often have to be deemphasized or reformulated to arrive at a coherent perspective.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Daly|2015|pp=|loc=Introduction and Historical Overview}} |2={{harvnb|Daniels|2020|loc=Lead Section, § 1. The Method of Reflective Equilibrium}} |3={{harvnb|Little|1984|pp=}} }}</ref>
===The analytic tradition===
{{Main|Analytic philosophy}}
The term ''analytic philosophy'' roughly designates a group of philosophical methods that stress detailed argumentation, attention to semantics, use of classical logic and non-classical logics and clarity of meaning above all other criteria. Some have held that philosophical problems arise through misuse of language or because of misunderstandings of the logic of our language, while some maintain that there are genuine philosophical problems and that philosophy is continuous with science. ] in his ''Origins of Analytical Philosophy'' makes the case for counting ]'s ''The Foundations of Arithmetic'' as the first analytic work, on the grounds that in that book Frege took the linguistic turn, analyzing philosophical problems through language. ] and ] are also often counted as founders of analytic philosophy, beginning with their rejection of British idealism, their defense of realism and the emphasis they laid on the legitimacy of analysis. Russell's classic works ''The Principles of Mathematics'',<ref>{{cite web|last=Russell |first=Bertrand |url=http://fair-use.org/bertrand-russell/the-principles-of-mathematics |title='&#39;The Principles of Mathematics'&#39; (1903) |publisher=Fair-use.org |date=1999-02-22 |accessdate=2010-08-22}}</ref> '']'' and '']'' with ], aside from greatly promoting the use of mathematical logic in philosophy, set the ground for much of the research program in the early stages of the analytic tradition, emphasizing such problems as: the reference of proper names, whether 'existence' is a property, the nature of propositions, the analysis of definite descriptions, the discussions on the foundations of mathematics; as well as exploring issues of ontological commitment and even metaphysical problems regarding time, the nature of matter, mind, persistence and change, which Russell tackled often with the aid of mathematical logic. Russell and Moore's philosophy, in the beginning of the 20th century, developed as a critique of ] and his British followers in particular, and of grand systems of ] in general, though by no means all analytic philosophers reject the philosophy of Hegel (see ]) nor speculative philosophy. Some schools in the group include ], and ] both markedly influenced by Russell and Wittgenstein's development of ] the former positively and the latter negatively.


Pragmatists stress the significance of concrete practical consequences for assessing whether a philosophical theory is true.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|McDermid|loc=Lead Section}} |2={{harvnb|Legg|Hookway|2021|loc=Lead Section}} }}</ref> According to the ] as formulated by ], the idea a person has of an object is nothing more than the totality of practical consequences they associate with this object. Pragmatists have also used this method to expose disagreements as merely verbal, that is, to show they make no genuine difference on the level of consequences.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|McDermid|loc=Lead Section, § 2a. A Method and A Maxim}} |2={{harvnb|Legg|Hookway|2021|loc=Lead Section, § 2. The Pragmatic Maxim: Peirce}} }}</ref>
In 1921, ], who studied under Russell at Cambridge, published his '']'', which gave a rigidly "logical" account of linguistic and philosophical issues. At the time, he understood most of the problems of philosophy as mere puzzles of language, which could be solved by investigating and then minding the logical structure of language. Years later, he reversed a number of the positions he set out in the ''Tractatus'', in for example his second major work, '']'' (1953). ''Investigations'' was influential in the development of "ordinary language philosophy," which was promoted by ], ], and a few others. In the United States, meanwhile, the philosophy of ] was having a major influence, with such classics as ]. In that paper Quine criticizes the distinction between analytic and synthetic statements, arguing that a clear conception of analyticity is unattainable. He argued for holism, the thesis that language, including scientific language, is a set of interconnected sentences, none of which can be verified on its own, rather, the sentences in the language depend on each other for their meaning and truth conditions. A consequence of Quine's approach is that language as a whole has only a thin relation to experience. Some sentences that refer directly to experience might be modified by sense impressions, but as the whole of language is theory-laden, for the whole language to be modified, more than this is required. However, most of the linguistic structure can in principle be revised, even logic, in order to better model the world. Notable students of Quine include ] and ]. The former devised a program for giving a semantics to natural language and thereby answer the philosophical conundrum "what is meaning?". A crucial part of the program was the use of ]'s semantic theory of truth. Dummett, among others, argued that truth conditions should be dispensed within the theory of meaning, and replaced by assertibility conditions. Some propositions, on this view, are neither true nor false, and thus such a theory of meaning entails a rejection of the ]. This, for Dummett, entails antirealism, as Russell himself pointed out in his ''An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth''.


Phenomenologists seek knowledge of the realm of appearance and the structure of human experience. They insist upon the first-personal character of all experience and proceed by suspending theoretical judgments about the external world. This technique of phenomenological reduction is known as "bracketing" or ]. The goal is to give an unbiased description of the appearance of things.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Cogan|loc=Lead Section, § 5. The Structure, Nature and Performance of the Phenomenological Reduction}} |2={{harvnb|Mehrtens|2010|loc=}} |3={{harvnb|Smith|2018|loc=Lead Section, § 1. What Is Phenomenology?}} |4={{harvnb|Smith|loc=Lead Section, § 2.Phenomenological Method}} }}</ref>
By the 1970s there was a renewed interest in many traditional philosophical problems by the younger generations of analytic philosophers. ], ], ] and others took an interest in traditional metaphysical problems, which they began exploring by the use of logic and philosophy of language. Among those problems some distinguished ones were: free will, ], the nature of personal identity, identity over time, the nature of the mind, the nature of causal laws, space-time, the properties of material beings, modality, etc. In those universities where analytic philosophy has spread, these problems are still being discussed passionately. Analytic philosophers are also interested in the methodology of analytic philosophy itself, with ], Wykeham Professor of Logic at Oxford, publishing recently a book entitled ''The Philosophy of Philosophy''. Some influential figures in contemporary analytic philosophy are: Timothy Williamson, ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. Analytic philosophy has sometimes been accused of not contributing to the political debate or to traditional questions in aesthetics. However, with the appearance of '']'' by ] and '']'' by ], analytic political philosophy acquired respectability. Analytic philosophers have also shown depth in their investigations of aesthetics, with ], ], ] and others developing the subject to its current shape.


] places great emphasis on the empirical approach and the resulting theories found in the natural sciences. In this way, it contrasts with methodologies that give more weight to pure reasoning and introspection.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Fischer|Collins|2015|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Fisher|Sytsma|2023|loc=}} |3={{harvnb|Papineau|2023|loc=§ 2. Methodological Naturalism}} }}</ref>
==Moral and political philosophy==
===Human nature and political legitimacy===
]]]
{{see also|Legitimacy (political)|Human nature}}
From ancient times, and well beyond them, the roots of justification for political authority were inescapably tied to outlooks on human nature. In ''The Republic'', ] presented the argument that the ideal society would be run by a council of ]s, since those best at philosophy are best able to realize the good. Even Plato, however, required philosophers to make their way in the world for many years before beginning their rule at the age of fifty. For ], humans are political animals (i.e. social animals), and governments are set up to pursue good for the community. Aristotle reasoned that, since the state ('']'') was the highest form of community, it has the purpose of pursuing the highest good. Aristotle viewed political power as the result of natural inequalities in skill and virtue. Because of these differences, he favored an aristocracy of the able and virtuous. For Aristotle, the person cannot be complete unless he or she lives in a community. His ''The Nicomachean Ethics'' and ''The Politics'' are meant to be read in that order. The first book addresses virtues (or "excellences") in the person as a citizen; the second addresses the proper form of government to ensure that citizens will be virtuous, and therefore complete. Both books deal with the essential role of justice in civic life.


== Relation to other fields ==
] rekindled Platonic thought in the early 15th century. He promoted democracy in Medieval Europe, both in his writings and in his organization of the Council of Florence. Unlike Aristotle and the Hobbesian tradition to follow, Cusa saw human beings as equal and divine (that is, made in God's image), so democracy would be the only just form of government. Cusa's views are credited by some as sparking the Italian Renaissance, which gave rise to the notion of "Nation-States".
Philosophy is closely related to many other fields. It is sometimes understood as a meta-discipline that clarifies their nature and limits. It does this by critically examining their basic concepts, background assumptions, and methods. In this regard, it plays a key role in providing an ] perspective. It bridges the gap between different disciplines by analyzing which concepts and problems they have in common. It shows how they overlap while also delimiting their scope.{{sfn|Audi|2006|pp=332–337}} Historically, most of the individual sciences originated from philosophy.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Tuomela|1985|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Grant|2007|p=}} }}</ref>


The influence of philosophy is felt in several fields that require difficult practical decisions. In ], philosophical considerations related to ] affect issues like whether an ] is already a ] and under what conditions ] is morally permissible. A closely related philosophical problem is how humans should treat other animals, for instance, whether it is acceptable to use non-human animals as food or for ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Dittmer|loc=Lead Section, § 3. Bioethics}} |2={{harvnb|Lippert-Rasmussen|2017|pp=4–5}} |3={{harvnb|Uniacke|2017|pp=34–35}} |4={{harvnb|Crary|2013|pp=321–322}} }}</ref> In relation to ] and professional life, philosophy has contributed by providing ethical frameworks. They contain guidelines on which business practices are morally acceptable and cover the issue of ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Dittmer|loc=Lead Section, § 2. Business Ethics, § 5. Professional Ethics}} |2={{harvnb|Lippert-Rasmussen|2017|pp=4–5}} |3={{harvnb|Uniacke|2017|pp=34–35}} }}</ref>
Later, ] rejected the views of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas as unrealistic. The ideal sovereign is not the embodiment of the moral virtues; rather the sovereign does whatever is successful and necessary, rather than what is morally praiseworthy. ] also contested many elements of Aristotle's views. For Hobbes, human nature is essentially anti-social: people are essentially egoistic, and this egoism makes life difficult in the natural state of things. Moreover, Hobbes argued, though people may have natural inequalities, these are trivial, since no particular talents or virtues that people may have will make them safe from harm inflicted by others. For these reasons, Hobbes concluded that the state arises from a common agreement to raise the community out of the ]. This can only be done by the establishment of a ], in which (or whom) is vested complete control over the community, and is able to inspire awe and terror in its subjects.<ref>{{cite book |author= Hobbes, Thomas |title=Leviathan |publisher=Penguin Classics |year=1985}}</ref>


Philosophical inquiry is relevant to many fields that are concerned with what to believe and how to arrive at evidence for one's beliefs.{{sfn|Lippert-Rasmussen|2017|pp=51–53}} This is a key issue for the sciences, which have as one of their prime objectives the creation of scientific knowledge. Scientific knowledge is based on ] but it is often not clear whether empirical observations are neutral or already ]. A closely connected problem is whether the available ] to decide between competing theories.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Bird|2010|pp=5–6, 8–9}} |2={{harvnb|Rosenberg|2013|pp=}} }}</ref> Epistemological problems in relation to the ] include what counts as evidence and how much evidence is required to find a person ] of a crime. A related issue in ] is how to ensure truth and ] when reporting on events.{{sfn|Audi|2006|pp=332–337}}
]]]
Many in the Enlightenment were unsatisfied with existing doctrines in political philosophy, which seemed to marginalize or neglect the possibility of a ]. ] was among those who attempted to overturn these doctrines: he responded to Hobbes by claiming that a human is by nature a kind of "]", and that society and social contracts corrupt this nature. Another critic was ]. In '']'' he agreed with Hobbes that the nation-state was an efficient tool for raising humanity out of a deplorable state, but he argued that the sovereign might become an abominable institution compared to the relatively benign unmodulated state of nature.<ref>{{cite book |author=Sigmund, Paul E. |title=The Selected Political Writings of John Locke |publisher=Norton |year=2005 |isbn=0-393-96451-5}}</ref>


In the fields of ] and religion, there are many doctrines associated with the existence and nature of God as well as rules governing correct behavior. A key issue is whether a rational person should believe these doctrines, for example, whether ] in the form of holy books and ]s of the divine are sufficient evidence for these beliefs.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Clark|2022|loc=Lead Section, § 1. Reason/Rationality}} |2={{harvnb|Forrest|2021|loc=Lead Section}} |3={{harvnb|Dougherty|2014|pp=97–98}} }}</ref>
Following the doctrine of the ], due in part to the influence of ] and his student ], appeals to human nature for political justification were weakened. Nevertheless, many political philosophers, especially ], still make use of some essential human nature as a basis for their arguments.


] is one of the philosophers responsible for the cultural influence of philosophy on the feminist movement.]]
] is derived from the work of ] and ]. Their idea that capitalism is based on exploitation of workers and causes alienation of people from their human nature, the ], their view of ], etc., have influenced many fields of study, such as sociology, economics, and politics. Marxism inspired the Marxist school of ], which brought a huge impact on the history of the 20th century.
Philosophy in the form of logic has been influential in the fields of mathematics and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Kakas|Sadri|2003|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Li|2014|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Nievergelt|2015|pp=v–vi}} }}</ref> Further fields influenced by philosophy include ], ], linguistics, ], and ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Audi|2006|pp=332–37}} |2={{harvnb|Murphy|2018|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Dittmer|loc=Lead Section, Table of Contents}} |4={{harvnb|Frankena|Raybeck|Burbules|2002|loc=§ Definition}} }}</ref> The close relation between philosophy and other fields in the contemporary period is reflected in the fact that many philosophy graduates go on to work in related fields rather than in philosophy itself.{{sfn|Cropper|1997}}


In the field of politics, philosophy addresses issues such as how to assess whether a government policy is just.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Dittmer|loc=Lead Section, § 6. Social Ethics, Distributive Justice, and Environmental Ethics}} |2={{harvnb|Lippert-Rasmussen|2017|pp=4–5}} }}</ref> Philosophical ideas have prepared and shaped various political developments. For example, ideals formulated in ] laid the foundation for ] and played a role in the ] and the ].{{sfn|Bristow|2023|loc=Lead Section, § 2.1 Political Theory}} Marxist philosophy and its exposition of communism was one of the factors in the ] and the ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Pipes|2020|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Wolff|Leopold|2021|loc=§ 9. Marx's Legacy}} |3={{harvnb|Shaw|2019|p=}} }}</ref> In India, ]'s ] shaped the ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Singh|2014|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Bondurant|1988|pp=23–24}} }}</ref>
===Consequentialism, deontology, and the aretaic turn===
{{Main|Consequentialism|Deontological ethics|Virtue ethics}}
]]]
One debate that has commanded the attention of ethicists in the modern era has been between ] (actions are to be morally evaluated solely by their ''consequences'') and ] (actions are to be morally evaluated solely by consideration of agents' ''duties'', the ''rights'' of those whom the action concerns, or both).


An example of the cultural and critical role of philosophy is found in its influence on the ] movement through philosophers such as ], ], and ]. It has shaped the understanding of key concepts in feminism, for instance, the meaning of ], how it differs from ], and what role it plays in the formation of ]. Philosophers have also investigated the concepts of justice and ] and their implications with respect to the ] in ].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|McAfee|2018|loc=Lead Section, 2.1 Feminist Beliefs and Feminist Movements}} |2={{harvnb|Ainley|2005|pp=}} |3={{harvnb|Hirschmann|2008|pp=}} |4={{harvnb|McAfee|Garry|Superson|Grasswick|2023|loc=Lead Section, 1. What Is Feminism?}}}}</ref>
] and ] are famous for propagating ], which is the idea that the fundamental moral rule is to strive toward the "greatest happiness for the greatest number". However, in promoting this idea they also necessarily promoted the broader doctrine of consequentialism.


The idea that philosophy is useful for many aspects of life and society is sometimes rejected. According to one such view, philosophy is mainly undertaken for its own sake and does not make significant contributions to existing practices or external goals.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Jones|Bos|2007|p=}} |2={{harvnb|Rickles|2020|p=}} |3={{harvnb|Lockie|2015|pp=24–28}} }}</ref>
Adopting a position opposed to consequentialism, ] argued that moral principles were simply products of reason. Kant believed that the incorporation of consequences into moral deliberation was a deep mistake, since it denies the necessity of practical maxims in governing the working of the will. According to Kant, reason requires that we conform our actions to the ], which is an absolute duty. An important 20th-century deontologist, ], argued for weaker forms of duties called ].


== See also ==
More recent works have emphasized the role of character in ethics, a movement known as the '']'' (that is, the ''turn towards virtues''). One strain of this movement followed the work of ]. Williams noted that rigid forms of consequentialism and deontology demanded that people behave impartially. This, Williams argued, requires that people abandon their personal projects, and hence their personal ], in order to be considered moral.

], in an influential paper, "Modern Moral Philosophy" (1958), revived ] as an alternative to what was seen as the entrenched positions of Kantianism and consequentialism. Aretaic perspectives have been inspired in part by research of ancient conceptions of virtue. For example, ] demands that people follow the ''Aristotelian mean'', or balance between two vices; and ] ethics argues that virtue consists largely in striving for harmony with other people. Virtue ethics in general has since gained many adherents, and has been defended by such philosophers as ], ], and ].

==Applied philosophy==
<!--This section is linked from ]-->
The ideas conceived by a society have profound repercussions on what actions the society performs. The applied study of philosophy yields applications such as those in ]—] in particular—and ]. The political and economic philosophies of ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and others—all of these have been used to shape and justify governments and their actions.

In the field of ], progressive education as championed by ] has had a profound impact on educational practices in the ] in the 20th century. Descendants of this movement include the current efforts in ], which are part of ]. ]'s political ] has had a profound effect on ], ], and ] in the 20th century, especially in the years around ]. Logic has become crucially important in ], ], ], ], and ].

Other important applications can be found in ], which aid in understanding the requisites for knowledge, sound evidence, and justified belief (important in ], ], ], and a number of other disciplines). The ] discusses the underpinnings of the ] and has affected the nature of scientific investigation and argumentation. As such, philosophy has fundamental implications for science as a whole. For example, the strictly empirical approach of Skinner's behaviorism affected for decades the approach of the American psychological establishment. ] and ] examine the moral situation of humans as occupants of a world that has non-human occupants to consider also. ] can help to interpret discussions of ], ], the ], and the whole artistic dimension of life. In general, the various philosophies strive to provide practical activities with a deeper understanding of the theoretical or conceptual underpinnings of their fields.

Often philosophy is seen as an investigation into an area not sufficiently well understood to be its own branch of knowledge. What were once philosophical pursuits have evolved into the modern day fields such as ], ], ], and ], for example.

'']'' reported an increase in philosophy majors at ] universities in 2008.<ref>"." '']''.</ref>

==See also==
{{Main|Outline of philosophy}} {{Main|Outline of philosophy}}
{{Portal|Philosophy}}
{{Misplaced Pages-Books}}
{{cols}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
{{colend}}
* ]
* ]
* ]


==References== == References ==
=== Notes ===
{{Reflist|2}}
{{notelist}}


==Further reading== === Citations ===
{{reflist|22em}}
===Introductions===
{{Refbegin|2}}
* ]. ''Thinking it Through&nbsp; – An Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy'', 2003, ISBN 0-19-513458-3
* Blumenau, Ralph. ''Philosophy and Living''. ISBN 0-907845-33-9
* Craig, Edward. ''Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction''. ISBN 0-19-285421-6
* Curley, Edwin, ''A Spinoza Reader'', Princeton, 1994, ISBN 0-691-00067-0
* Durant, Will, ''Story of Philosophy: The Lives and Opinions of the World's Greatest Philosophers'', Pocket, 1991, ISBN 0-671-73916-6, ISBN 978-0-671-73916-4
* Harrison-Barbet, Anthony, ''Mastering Philosophy''. ISBN 0-333-69343-4
* Higgins, Kathleen M. and Solomon, Robert C. ''A Short History of Philosophy''. ISBN 0-19-510196-0
* ] magazine
* Russell, Bertrand. ''''. ISBN 0-19-511552-X
* Sinclair, Alistair J. ''What is Philosophy? An Introduction'', 2008, ISBN 978-1-903765-94-4
* Sober, E. (2001). ''Core Questions in Philosophy: A Text with Readings''. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-189869-8
* Solomon, Robert C. ''Big Questions: A Short Introduction to Philosophy''. ISBN 0-534-16708-X
* Warburton, Nigel. ''Philosophy: The Basics''. ISBN 0-415-14694-1
* Lively and accessible articles written by philosophers pre-eminent in their fields, for a broad audience. Free articles are available online.
{{Refend}}


===Topical introductions=== ===Bibliography===
<!-- PLEASE MAINTAIN ALPHABETICAL ORDER WITH ANY ADDITIONS YOU MAKE.
{{Refbegin|2}}
THANK YOU!-->
* Copleston, Frederick. ''Philosophy in Russia: From Herzen to Lenin and Berdyaev''. ISBN 0-268-01569-4
{{Refbegin|30em}}
* Critchley, Simon. ''Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction''. ISBN 0-19-285359-7
* {{cite book |last1=Adamson |first1=Peter |last2=Ganeri |first2=Jonardon |title=Classical Indian Philosophy |series=A History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps |volume=5 |date=2020 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-885176-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NCbTDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA101 |access-date=30 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* Hamilton, Sue. ''Indian Philosophy: a Very Short Introduction''. ISBN 0-19-285374-0
* {{cite book |last1=Adamson |first1=Peter |last2=Taylor |first2=Richard C. |title=The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy |date=2004 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-49469-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iFMiAwAAQBAJ |access-date=7 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* Harwood, Sterling, ed., Business as Ethical and Business as Usual (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 2000); www.sterlingharwood.com
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Adamson |first1=Peter |title=Al-Kindi |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/al-kindi/ |encyclopedia=] |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=7 June 2023 |date=2020 |archive-date=21 May 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190521181245/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/al-kindi/ |url-status=live }}
* Imbo, Samuel Oluoch. '3'An Introduction to African Philosophy''. ISBN 0-8476-8841-0
* {{cite book |last1=Adamson |first1=Peter |title=Byzantine and Renaissance Philosophy |series=A History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps |date=2022 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-266992-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UmlbEAAAQBAJ |volume=6 |access-date=25 May 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* Knight, Kelvin. ''Aristotelian Philosophy: Ethics and Politics from Aristotle to MacIntyre''. ISBN 0-7456-1977-0
* {{cite book |last1=Adamson |first1=Peter |title=Medieval Philosophy |date=2019 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-884240-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hverDwAAQBAJ |series=A History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps |volume=4 |access-date=25 May 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* Kupperman, Joel J. ''Classic Asian Philosophy: A Guide to the Essential Texts''. ISBN 0-19-513335-8
* {{cite book |last1=Adamson |first1=Peter |title=Philosophy in the Islamic World |date=2016 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-957749-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KEpRDAAAQBAJ |series=A History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps |volume=3 |access-date=25 May 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* Leaman, Oliver. ''A Brief Introduction to Islamic Philosophy''. ISBN 0-7456-1960-6
* {{cite book |title=How to Think About the Great Ideas: From the Great Books of Western Civilization |last=Adler |first=Mortimer J. |date=2000 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Pv3BHyktJWkC |publisher=Open Court |isbn=978-0-8126-9412-3 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* Lee, Joe and Powell, Jim. ''Eastern Philosophy For Beginners''. ISBN 0-86316-282-7
* {{cite dictionary |title=Philosophy |url=https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=philosophy&submit.x=58&submit.y=14 |dictionary=The American Heritage Dictionary |publisher=HarperCollins |access-date=7 July 2023 |date=2022 |archive-date=3 September 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230903173017/https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=philosophy&submit.x=58&submit.y=14 |url-status=live |ref={{sfnref|AHD Staff|2022}}}}
* Nagel, Thomas. ''What Does It All Mean? A Very Short Introduction to Philosophy''. ISBN 0-19-505292-7
* {{cite book |last1=Ainley |first1=Alison |chapter=Feminist Philosophy |editor1-last=Honderich |editor1-first=Ted |title=The Oxford Companion to Philosophy |date=2005 |publisher=Oxford University Press |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/HONTOC-2 |access-date=2 January 2022 |archive-date=29 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210129082636/https://philpapers.org/rec/HONTOC-2 |url-status=live |isbn=978-0-19-926479-7 }}
* Scruton, Roger. ''A Short History of Modern Philosophy''. ISBN 0-415-26763-3
* {{cite book |last1=Andrea |first1=Alfred J. |last2=Overfield |first2=James H. |title=The Human Record: Sources of Global History, Volume I: To 1500 |date=2015 |publisher=Cengage Learning |isbn=978-1-305-53746-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=x5-aBAAAQBAJ |access-date=10 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* Smart, Ninian. ''World Philosophies''. ISBN 0-415-22852-2
* {{cite book |last1=Anshakov |first1=Oleg M. |last2=Gergely |first2=Tamás |title=Cognitive Reasoning: A Formal Approach |date=2010 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-3-540-68875-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OuyQgE_gf2QC&pg=PA128 |access-date=17 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* ]. ''The Passion of the Western Mind: Understanding the Ideas That Have Shaped Our World View''. ISBN 0-345-36809-6
* {{cite book |last1=Anstey |first1=Peter R. |last2=Vanzo |first2=Alberto |title=Experimental Philosophy and the Origins of Empiricism |date=2023 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-009-03467-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2LytEAAAQBAJ |access-date=2 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Arola |first1=Adam |editor-last1=Garfield |editor-first1=Jay L. |editor-last2=Edelglass |editor-first2=William |title=The Oxford Handbook of World Philosophy |date=2011 |doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195328998.003.0048 |url=https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/28241/chapter-abstract/213354161?redirectedFrom=fulltext |chapter=40 Native American Philosophy |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-532899-8 |access-date=14 November 2023 |archive-date=14 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231114095255/https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/28241/chapter-abstract/213354161?redirectedFrom=fulltext |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Audi |first1=Robert |editor1-last=Borchert |editor1-first=Donald M. |title=Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 7: Oakeshott - Presupposition |date=2006 |publisher=Thomson Gale, Macmillan Reference |isbn=978-0-02-865787-5 |edition=2. |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/philosophy-and-religion/philosophy/philosophy-terms-and-concepts/philosophy |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220214235128/https://www.encyclopedia.com/philosophy-and-religion/philosophy/philosophy-terms-and-concepts/philosophy |archive-date=14 February 2022 |chapter=Philosophy |access-date=10 November 2023 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Banhatti |first1=G. S. |title=Life and Philosophy of Swami Vivekananda |date=1995 |publisher=Atlantic Publishers & Dist |isbn=978-81-7156-291-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jK5862eV7_EC |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Banicki |first1=Konrad |title=Philosophy As Therapy: Towards a Conceptual Model |journal=Philosophical Papers |date=2014 |volume=43 |issue=1 |pages=7–31 |doi=10.1080/05568641.2014.901692 |s2cid=144901869 |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/BANPAT |access-date=15 February 2022 |archive-date=13 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220213125130/https://philpapers.org/rec/BANPAT |url-status=live |issn=0556-8641 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Barsky |first1=Allan E. |title=Ethics and Values in Social Work: An Integrated Approach for a Comprehensive Curriculum |date=2009 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-971758-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jqIzhD2lzj0C&pg=PA3 |access-date=6 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last=Bayne |first=Tim |year=2018 |title=The Philosophy of Religion: A Very Short Introduction |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-875496-1 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Beaney |first1=Michael |title=The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy |date=2013 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-166266-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eMZoAgAAQBAJ |access-date=25 May 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Bell |first1=Richard H. |last2=Fernback |first2=Jan |title=Understanding African Philosophy: A Cross-cultural Approach to Classical and Contemporary Issues |date=2015 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-135-94866-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1NuSAgAAQBAJ |access-date=15 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Biletzki |first1=Anat |last2=Matar |first2=Anat |title=Ludwig Wittgenstein |at=3.7 The Nature of Philosophy |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wittgenstein/#LateNatuPhil |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=11 February 2022 |date=2021 |archive-date=8 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180908083428/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wittgenstein/#LateNatuPhil |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Bilimoria |first1=Puruṣottama |title=History of Indian Philosophy |date=2018 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-30976-9 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Bird |first1=Alexander |title=The Epistemology of Science—a Bird's-eye View |journal=Synthese |date=2010 |volume=175 |issue=S1 |pages=5–16 |doi=10.1007/s11229-010-9740-4 |s2cid=15228491 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Birner |first1=Betty J. |title=Introduction to Pragmatics |date=2012 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-118-34830-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9pQ3KPKY1hkC&pg=PT33 |access-date=21 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Blackburn |first1=Simon W. |title=Philosophy of Language |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/philosophy-of-language |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date=18 July 2023 |date=2022 |archive-date=13 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210513032602/https://www.britannica.com/topic/philosophy-of-language |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Blackburn |first1=Simon W. |title=The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy |date=2008 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-954143-0 |edition=2 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Blackson |first1=Thomas A. |title=Ancient Greek Philosophy: From the Presocratics to the Hellenistic Philosophers |date=2011 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-4443-9608-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=89zzlbsG1KgC |access-date=28 May 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Blackwell |first1=Kenneth |title=The Spinozistic Ethics of Bertrand Russell |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-135-10711-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rRrfO14H5i0C&pg=PA148 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Blair |first1=J. Anthony |author1-link=J. Anthony Blair |last2=Johnson |first2=Ralph H. |title=Informal Logic: An Overview |journal=Informal Logic |year=2000 |volume=20 |issue=2 |doi=10.22329/il.v20i2.2262 |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/BLAILA-3 |access-date=29 December 2021 |archive-date=9 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211209195317/https://philpapers.org/rec/BLAILA-3 |url-status=live |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite book |last1=Bondurant |first1=Joan Valérie |title=Conquest of Violence: The Gandhian Philosophy of Conflict |date=1988 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-02281-9 |edition=New rev. }}
* {{cite book |last1=Bottin |first1=Francesco |title=Models of the History of Philosophy: From Its Origins in the Renaissance to the 'Historia Philosophica': Volume I: From Its Origins in the Renaissance to the 'Historia Philosophica' |date=1993 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-0-7923-2200-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FJ7UBP_jYeMC&pg=PA151 |access-date=7 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Botz-Bornstein |first1=Thorsten |title=Daoism, Dandyism, and Political Correctness |date=2023 |publisher=State University of New York Press |isbn=978-1-4384-9453-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_-rMEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT61 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Bowle |first1=John Edward |last2=Arneson |first2=Richard J. |title=Political Philosophy |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/political-philosophy |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date=21 July 2023 |date=2023 |archive-date=15 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210415235446/https://www.britannica.com/topic/political-philosophy |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Boyd |first1=Craig A. |last2=Timpe |first2=Kevin |title=The Virtues: A Very Short Introduction |date=2021 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-258407-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OIskEAAAQBAJ |access-date=13 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Brenner |first1=William H. |title=Logic and Philosophy: An Integrated Introduction |date=1993 |publisher=University of Notre Dame Press |isbn=978-0-268-15898-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DFoFDgAAQBAJ&pg=PT16 |access-date=5 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Bristow |first1=William |title=Enlightenment |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/enlightenment/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=4 September 2023 |date=2023 |archive-date=11 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171211080212/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/enlightenment/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Brown |first1=James Robert |last2=Fehige |first2=Yiftach |title=Thought Experiments |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thought-experiment/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=29 October 2021 |date=2019 |archive-date=21 November 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171121022040/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thought-experiment/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Burns |first1=Elizabeth |title=What Is This Thing Called Philosophy of Religion? |date=2017 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-59546-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YWU9DwAAQBAJ |access-date=21 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Chalmers |first1=David J. |title=Why Isn't There More Progress in Philosophy? |journal=Philosophy |date=2015 |volume=90 |issue=1 |pages=3–31 |doi=10.1017/s0031819114000436 |hdl=1885/57201 |s2cid=170974260 |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/CHAWIT-15 |access-date=27 February 2022 |archive-date=13 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220213124652/https://philpapers.org/rec/CHAWIT-15 |url-status=live |hdl-access=free }}
* {{cite book |last1=Chamankhah |first1=Leila |title=The Conceptualization of Guardianship in Iranian Intellectual History (1800–1989): Reading Ibn ʿArabī's Theory of Wilāya in the Shīʿa World |date=2019 |publisher=Springer Nature |isbn=978-3-030-22692-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2GGtDwAAQBAJ |access-date=9 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Chambre |first1=Henri |last2=Maurer |first2=Armand |last3=Stroll |first3=Avrum |last4=McLellan |first4=David T. |last5=Levi |first5=Albert William |last6=Wolin |first6=Richard |last7=Fritz |first7=Kurt von |title=Western Philosophy |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Western-philosophy |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date=30 May 2023 |date=2023 |archive-date=13 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210513135159/https://www.britannica.com/topic/Western-philosophy |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Chimakonam |first1=Jonathan O. |title=History of African Philosophy |url=https://iep.utm.edu/history-of-african-philosophy/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=14 June 2023 |date=2023 |archive-date=5 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230605181437/https://iep.utm.edu/history-of-african-philosophy/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Chimakonam |first1=Johnathan O. |last2=Ogbonnaya |first2= L. Uchenna |title=African Metaphysics, Epistemology and a New Logic |chapter=Toward an African Theory of Knowledge |year=2021 |doi=10.1007/978-3-030-72445-0_8 |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-72445-0_8 |isbn=9783030724474}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Clark |first1=Kelly James |title=Religious Epistemology |url=https://iep.utm.edu/relig-ep/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=21 September 2022 |date=2022 |archive-date=21 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220921184650/https://iep.utm.edu/relig-ep/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Coetzee |first1=Pieter Hendrik |last2=Roux |first2=A. P. J. |title=The African Philosophy Reader |date=1998 |publisher=Psychology Press |isbn=978-0-415-18905-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8iz90Qo8G_oC&pg=PA88 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Cogan |first1=John |title=Phenomenological Reduction, The |url=https://iep.utm.edu/phen-red/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=27 February 2022 |archive-date=4 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200404124423/https://www.iep.utm.edu/phen-red/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Colman |first1=Andrew M. |title=A Dictionary of Psychology |date=2009a |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-953406-7 |url=https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095705926;jsessionid=A19D30BFCF6E02A0F21A87B805F10DEE |chapter=Declarative Knowledge |access-date=16 April 2023 |archive-date=30 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330090713/https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095705926;jsessionid=A19D30BFCF6E02A0F21A87B805F10DEE |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Copleston |first1=Frederick |title=History of Philosophy Volume 1: Greece and Rome |date=2003 |publisher=Continuum |isbn=978-0-8264-6895-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Y08L-MC36JUC |access-date=25 May 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Cotterell |first1=Brian |title=Physics and Culture |date=2017 |publisher=World Scientific |isbn=978-1-78634-378-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hpA4DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA458 |access-date=25 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Coughlin |first1=John J. |title=Law, Person, and Community: Philosophical, Theological, and Comparative Perspectives on Canon Law |date=2012 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-987718-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QPFoAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA15 |access-date=16 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Craig |first1=Edward |title=Metaphysics |url=https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/overview/metaphysics/v-1 |encyclopedia=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Routledge |access-date=15 July 2023 |date=1998 |archive-date=1 August 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230801213535/https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/overview/metaphysics/v-1 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Crary |first1=Alice |editor1-last=Petrus |editor1-first=Klaus |editor2-last=Wild |editor2-first=Markus |title=Animal Minds & Animal Ethics |date=2013 |publisher=transcript Verlag |isbn=978-3-8394-2462-9 |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/transcript.9783839424629.321/pdf |chapter=13. Eating and Experimenting on Animals |doi=10.1515/transcript.9783839424629.321 |doi-broken-date=1 November 2024 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}
* {{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1997/12/26/business/philosophers-find-the-degree-pays-off-in-life-and-in-work.html |title=Philosophers Find the Degree Pays Off in Life and in Work |last=Cropper |first=Carol Marie |date=1997 |newspaper=The New York Times |issn=0362-4331 |access-date=2 May 2016 |archive-date=28 January 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170128202946/http://www.nytimes.com/1997/12/26/business/philosophers-find-the-degree-pays-off-in-life-and-in-work.html |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Crumley |first1=Jack S |title=A Brief Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind |date=2006 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers |isbn=978-0-7425-7212-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Yf4eAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA2 |access-date=19 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Cua |first1=Antonio S. |chapter=The Emergence of the History of Chinese Philosophy |editor1-last=Mou |editor1-first=Bo |title=History of Chinese Philosophy |date=2009 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-203-00286-5 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Dalal |first1=Neil |title=Śaṅkara |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/shankara/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=19 June 2023 |date=2021 |archive-date=27 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220127111736/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/shankara/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Daly |first1=Christopher |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods |date=2015 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK |isbn=978-1-137-34455-7 |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137344557_1 |chapter=Introduction and Historical Overview |pages=1–30 |doi=10.1057/9781137344557_1 |access-date=18 April 2022 |archive-date=1 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220501081115/https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137344557_1 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Daly |first1=Christopher |title=An Introduction to Philosophical Methods |date=2010 |publisher=Broadview Press |isbn=978-1-55111-934-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wilaDwAAQBAJ |chapter=Introduction |access-date=7 June 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Daniels |first1=Norman |title=Reflective Equilibrium |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reflective-equilibrium/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=28 February 2022 |date=2020 |archive-date=22 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220222215102/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reflective-equilibrium/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Davis |first1=Bret W. |title=The Kyoto School |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kyoto-school/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=7 November 2023 |date=2022 |archive-date=28 September 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230928152229/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kyoto-school/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Defoort |first1=Carine |last2=Standaert |first2=Nicolas |title=The Mozi as an Evolving Text: Different Voices in Early Chinese Thought |date=2013 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-23434-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Vdl0smlDVtEC |access-date=21 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Dehsen |first1=Christian von |title=Philosophers and Religious Leaders |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-135-95102-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cU7cAAAAQBAJ |access-date=28 May 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Dellsén |first1=Finnur |last2=Lawler |first2=Insa |last3=Norton |first3=James |title=Thinking about Progress: From Science to Philosophy |journal=Noûs |date=2021 |volume=56 |issue=4 |pages=814–840 |doi=10.1111/nous.12383 |s2cid=235967433 |doi-access=free |hdl=11250/2836808 |hdl-access=free }}
* {{cite book |last1=Dever |first1=Josh |editor-first1=Herman |editor-first2=Tamar Szabó |editor-first3=John |editor-last1=Cappelen |editor-last2=Gendler |editor-last3=Hawthorne |chapter=What Is Philosophical Methodology? |title=The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology |date=2016 |pages=3–24 |doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668779.013.34 |isbn=978-0-19-966877-9 |url=https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668779.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199668779-e-34 |access-date=18 April 2022 |archive-date=5 December 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201205194742/https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668779.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199668779-e-34 |url-status=live |publisher=Oxford University Press }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Dittmer |first1=Joel |title=Ethics, Applied |url=https://iep.utm.edu/applied-ethics/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=2 July 2023 |archive-date=1 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230601064729/https://iep.utm.edu/applied-ethics/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Dougherty |first1=Trent |title=Faith, Trust, and Testimony |journal=Religious Faith and Intellectual Virtue |date=2014 |pages=97–123 |doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672158.003.0005 |isbn=978-0-19-967215-8 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Douven |first1=Igor |title=Abduction and Explanatory Reasoning |url=https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780195396577/obo-9780195396577-0385.xml |encyclopedia=Oxford Bibliographies |publisher=Oxford University Press |access-date=18 January 2023 |date=2022 |archive-date=10 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230210114239/https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780195396577/obo-9780195396577-0385.xml |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Dowden |first1=Bradley H. |title=Fallacies |url=https://iep.utm.edu/fallacy/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=22 January 2023 |date=2023 |archive-date=3 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190603000334/https://www.iep.utm.edu/fallacy/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Dowden |first1=Bradley H. |title=Logical Reasoning |date=2020 |url=https://www.csus.edu/indiv/d/dowdenb/4/logical-reasoning-archives/Logical-Reasoning-2020-05-15.pdf |access-date=17 July 2023 |archive-date=2 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230602004345/https://www.csus.edu/indiv/d/dowdenb/4/logical-reasoning-archives/Logical-Reasoning-2020-05-15.pdf |url-status=live }} (for an earlier version, see: {{cite book |last1=Dowden |first1=Bradley H. |title=Logical Reasoning |date=1993 |publisher=Wadsworth Publishing Company |isbn=978-0-534-17688-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gzMQAQAAIAAJ |access-date=17 July 2023 |ref=none }}){{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |title=Intuitionism (Ethics) |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/intuitionism-ethics |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date=28 February 2022 |archive-date=7 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220307123948/https://www.britannica.com/topic/intuitionism-ethics |url-status=live |last1=Duignan |first1=Brian |date=2009 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Duignan |first1=Brian |title=Ancient Philosophy: From 600 BCE to 500 CE |date=2010 |publisher=The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc |isbn=978-1-61530-141-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MfBS-RXJ5RsC |access-date=30 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |editor1-last=Duignan |editor1-first=Brian |title=The Science and Philosophy of Politics |date=2012 |publisher=Britannica Educational Publishing |isbn=978-1-61530-748-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ye-cAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA5 |access-date=21 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |title=Chinese Philosophy |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Chinese-philosophy |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date=12 June 2023 |date=2017 |archive-date=2 May 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150502233005/http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/112694/Chinese-philosophy |url-status=live |ref={{sfnref|EB Staff|2017}} }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |title=History and Periods of Indian Philosophy |url=https://www.britannica.com/summary/Indian-philosophy |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date=10 June 2023 |date=2023 |archive-date=11 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230611075241/https://www.britannica.com/summary/Indian-philosophy |url-status=live |ref={{sfnref|EB Staff|2023}} }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |title=Islamic Philosophy |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Islamic-philosophy |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |date=2020 |access-date=7 June 2023 |archive-date=7 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230607072850/https://www.britannica.com/topic/Islamic-philosophy |url-status=live |ref={{sfnref|EB Staff|2020}} }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |title=Philosophy |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/philosophy |access-date=29 May 2022 |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |archive-date=23 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210223162559/https://www.britannica.com/topic/philosophy |url-status=live |date=2023 |ref={{sfnref|EB Staff|2023a}} }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |title=Philosophy of Common Sense |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/philosophy-of-common-sense |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date=27 February 2022 |archive-date=7 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220307123948/https://www.britannica.com/topic/philosophy-of-common-sense |url-status=live |date=2007 |ref={{sfnref|EB Staff|2007}} }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |title=Ordinary Language Analysis |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/ordinary-language-analysis |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date=28 February 2022 |archive-date=7 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220307123949/https://www.britannica.com/topic/ordinary-language-analysis |url-status=live |date=2022 |ref={{sfnref|EB Staff|2022}} }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Eder |first1=Anna-Maria A. |last2=Lawler |first2=Insa |last3=van Riel |first3=Raphael |title=Philosophical Methods Under Scrutiny: Introduction to the Special Issue Philosophical Methods |journal=Synthese |date=2020 |volume=197 |issue=3 |pages=915–923 |doi=10.1007/s11229-018-02051-2 |s2cid=54631297 |issn=1573-0964 |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite book |last1=Espín |first1=Orlando O. |last2=Nickoloff |first2=James B. |title=An Introductory Dictionary of Theology and Religious Studies |date=2007 |publisher=Liturgical Press |isbn=978-0-8146-5856-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=k85JKr1OXcQC&pg=PA8 |access-date=16 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last=Esposito |first=John L. |title=The Oxford Dictionary of Islam |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-512559-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6VeCWQfVNjkC |date=2003 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Fischer |first1=Eugen |last2=Collins |first2=John |title=Experimental Philosophy, Rationalism, and Naturalism: Rethinking Philosophical Method |date=2015 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-50027-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4VuhCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA4 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Fisher |first1=Eugen |last2=Sytsma |first2=Justin |editor1-last=Bauer |editor1-first=Alexander Max |editor2-last=Kornmesser |editor2-first=Stephan |title=The Compact Compendium of Experimental Philosophy |date=2023 |publisher=Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG |isbn=978-3-11-071702-0 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C83bEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT9 |chapter=Projects and Methods of Experimental Philosophy |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Fiet |first1=James O. |title=The Theoretical World of Entrepreneurship |date=2022 |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |isbn=978-1-80037-147-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nK1jEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA133 |access-date=16 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Flavel |first1=Sarah |last2=Robbiano |first2=Chiara |title=Key Concepts in World Philosophies: A Toolkit for Philosophers |date=2023 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing |isbn=978-1-350-16814-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=q0KaEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT279 |access-date=19 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Forrest |first1=Peter |title=The Epistemology of Religion |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/religion-epistemology/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=21 September 2022 |date=2021 |archive-date=10 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220710182220/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/religion-epistemology/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Frankena |first1=William K. |last2=Raybeck |first2=Nathan |last3=Burbules |first3=Nicholas |contribution=Philosophy of Education |year=2002 |title=Encyclopedia of Education |edition=2nd |editor-last=Guthrie |editor-first=James W. |publisher=Macmillan Reference |isbn=978-0-02-865594-9 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Frede |first1=Michael |title=The Historiography of Philosophy |date=2022 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-884072-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cy9VEAAAQBAJ |access-date=24 May 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Gelan |first1=Victor Eugen |chapter=Husserl's Idea of Rigorous Science and its Relevance for the Human and Social Sciences |title=The Subject(s) of Phenomenology |date=2020 |publisher=Springer International Publishing |isbn=978-3-030-29357-4 |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-29357-4_6 |series=Contributions to Phenomenology |volume=108 |pages=97–105 |doi=10.1007/978-3-030-29357-4_6 |s2cid=213082313 |access-date=27 February 2022 |archive-date=2 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220302082534/http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-29357-4_6 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Glenney |first1=Brian |last2=Silva |first2=José Filipe |title=The Senses and the History of Philosophy |date=2019 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-351-73106-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gH6JDwAAQBAJ |access-date=16 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Goffi |first1=Jean-Yves |last2=Roux |first2=Sophie |author2-link=Sophie Roux |title=On the Very Idea of a Thought Experiment |journal=Thought Experiments in Methodological and Historical Contexts |date=2011 |pages=165–191 |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/GOFOTV |publisher=Brill |doi=10.1163/ej.9789004201767.i-233.35 |isbn=978-90-04-20177-4 |s2cid=260640180 |access-date=18 April 2022 |archive-date=30 October 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211030152653/https://philpapers.org/rec/GOFOTV |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Gorisse |first1=Marie-Hélène |title=Jaina Philosophy |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/jaina-philosophy/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=19 November 2023 |date=2023 |archive-date=17 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230217095842/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/jaina-philosophy/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Gracia |first1=Jorge J. E. |title=Metaphysics and Its Task: The Search for the Categorial Foundation of Knowledge |date=1999 |publisher=State University of New York Press |isbn=978-0-7914-4214-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PrUkAQAAMAAJ |access-date=16 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Gracia |first1=Jorge J. E. |last2=Vargas |first2=Manuel |title=Latin American Philosophy |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/latin-american-philosophy/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=7 November 2023 |date=2018 |archive-date=11 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180611112950/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/latin-american-philosophy/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Graham |first1=Jacob N. |title=Ancient Greek Philosophy |url=https://iep.utm.edu/ancient-greek-philosophy/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=25 May 2023 |date=2023 |archive-date=25 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220825215433/https://iep.utm.edu/ancient-greek-philosophy/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Grant |first1=Edward |title=A History of Natural Philosophy: From the Ancient World to the Nineteenth Century |date=2007 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-86931-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BxbLDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA318 |access-date=7 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Grayling |first1=A. C. |title=The History of Philosophy |date=2019 |publisher=Penguin UK |isbn=978-0-241-98086-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bDJwDwAAQBAJ |access-date=30 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Greco |first1=John |title=Epistemology |url=https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/overview/epistemology/v-3 |encyclopedia=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Routledge |access-date=14 July 2023 |date=2021 |archive-date=14 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230714173814/https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/overview/epistemology/v-3 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Griffel |first1=Frank |title=Al-Ghazali |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/al-ghazali/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=19 June 2023 |date=2020 |archive-date=28 May 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230528070053/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/al-ghazali/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Grimm |first1=Stephen R. |last2=Cohoe |first2=Caleb |title=What Is Philosophy as a Way of Life? Why Philosophy as a Way of Life? |journal=European Journal of Philosophy |date=2021 |volume=29 |issue=1 |pages=236–251 |doi=10.1111/ejop.12562 |s2cid=225504495 |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejop.12562 |issn=1468-0378 |access-date=15 February 2022 |archive-date=13 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220213124653/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejop.12562 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Groarke |first1=Leo |title=Informal Logic |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-informal/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=31 December 2021 |year=2021 |archive-date=12 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220112030519/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-informal/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Gutas |first1=Dimitri |title=Ibn Sina |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ibn-sina/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=7 June 2023 |date=2016 |archive-date=27 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230427150147/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ibn-sina/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Guyer |first1=Paul |title=Kant |date=2014 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-135-01563-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=a4T8AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA7 |access-date=9 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Haack |first1=Susan |author-link=Susan Haack |title=Philosophy of Logics |date=1978 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/HAAPOL-2 |chapter=1. 'Philosophy of Logics' |access-date=29 December 2021 |archive-date=7 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211207200551/https://philpapers.org/rec/HAAPOL-2 |url-status=live |isbn=978-0-521-29329-7 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Haaparanta |first1=Leila |last2=Koskinen |first2=Heikki J. |title=Categories of Being: Essays on Metaphysics and Logic |date=2012 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-989057-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yz8sko5zVyUC&pg=PA454 |access-date=16 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Hacker |first1=P. M. S. |title=Wittgenstein: Comparisons and Context |date=2013 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-967482-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8W1BAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA6 |access-date=10 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Hadot |first1=Pierre |title=Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises From Socrates to Foucault |date=1995 |publisher=Blackwell |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/HADPAA |chapter=11. Philosophy as a Way of Life |access-date=15 February 2022 |archive-date=14 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220214234651/https://philpapers.org/rec/HADPAA |url-status=live |isbn=978-0-631-18033-3 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Hansen |first1=Hans |title=Fallacies |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fallacies/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=18 March 2021 |year=2020 |archive-date=29 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210329182946/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fallacies/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Heidemann |first1=Dietmar H. |title=Kant and Non-conceptual Content |date=2014 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-98155-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6pTJAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT140 |access-date=19 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Heil |first1=John Fergusson |title=Philosophy of Mind: A Contemporary Introduction |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-89175-2 |edition=3rd }}
* {{cite journal |last=Herbjørnsrud |first=Dag |date=2021 |title=The Quest for a Global Age of Reason |journal=Dialogue and Universalism |volume=31 |issue=3 |pages=113–131 |doi=10.5840/du202131348 |issn=1234-5792 }}
* {{cite book |last=Herbjørnsrud |first=Dag |chapter=Preface |date=2023 |title=The Hatata Inquiries |pages=IX–XIV |editor-last=Lee |editor-first=Ralph |publisher=De Gruyter |doi=10.1515/9783110781922-203 |isbn=978-3-11-078192-2 |editor2-last=Worku |editor2-first=Mehari |editor3-last=Belcher |editor3-first=Wendy Laura }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Hetherington |first1=Stephen |title=Knowledge |url=https://iep.utm.edu/knowledg/#SH3c |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |at=§ 3c. Knowing Purely by Thinking |access-date=22 July 2023 |archive-date=2 June 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220602105750/https://iep.utm.edu/knowledg/#SH3c |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Hintikka |first1=Jaakko J. |author-link=Jaakko Hintikka |title=Philosophy of Logic |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/philosophy-of-logic |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date=21 November 2021 |archive-date=28 April 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150428101732/http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/346240/philosophy-of-logic |url-status=live |date=2019 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Hirschmann |first1=Nancy |chapter=8. Feminist Political Philosophy |editor-last1=Kittay |editor-first1=Eva Feder |editor-last2=Alcoff |editor-first2=Linda Martín |title=The Blackwell Guide to Feminist Philosophy |date=2008 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-0-470-69538-8 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZinYQ0vgFEsC&pg=PA148 |access-date=8 July 2023 |author-link=Nancy Hirschmann |editor-link1=Eva Kittay |editor-link2=Linda Martín Alcoff }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Hoad |first1=T. F. |title=The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology |date=1993 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=0-19-283098-8 }}
* {{cite book |last=Howard |first=Dick |year=2010 |title=The Primacy of the Political: A History of Political Thought From the Greeks to the French and American Revolutions |publisher=Columbia University Press |isbn=978-0-231-13595-5 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Hursthouse |first1=Rosalind |last2=Pettigrove |first2=Glen |title=Virtue Ethics |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=20 August 2023 |date=2022 |archive-date=25 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230625204904/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Hylton |first1=Peter |last2=Kemp |first2=Gary |title=Willard Van Orman Quine: 3. The Analytic-Synthetic Distinction and the Argument Against Logical Empiricism |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/quine/#AnalSyntDistArguAgaiLogiEmpi |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |date=2020 |access-date=27 February 2022 |archive-date=25 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225093830/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/quine/#AnalSyntDistArguAgaiLogiEmpi |url-status=live }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Ichikawa |first1=Jonathan |title=Chris Daly: An Introduction to Philosophical Methods |url=https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/an-introduction-to-philosophical-methods/ |journal=Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews |date=2011 |access-date=22 February 2022 |archive-date=7 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220307123949/https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/an-introduction-to-philosophical-methods/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Ichikawa |first1=Jonathan Jenkins |last2=Steup |first2=Matthias |title=The Analysis of Knowledge |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-analysis/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=15 November 2023 |date=2018 |archive-date=2 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220502031402/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-analysis/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Ifantidou |first1=Elly |title=Pragmatic Competence and Relevance |date=2014 |publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company |isbn=978-90-272-7037-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4bKKAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT12 |access-date=21 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Ingarden |first1=Roman |title=On the Motives which led Husserl to Transcendental Idealism |date=1975 |publisher=Springer Netherlands |isbn=978-94-010-1689-6 |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-010-1689-6_3 |chapter=The Concept of Philosophy as Rigorous Science |series=Phaenomenologica |volume=64 |pages=8–11 |doi=10.1007/978-94-010-1689-6_3 |access-date=27 February 2022 |archive-date=13 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220213124651/https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-010-1689-6_3 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Jacobs |first1=James M. |title=Seat of Wisdom: An Introduction to Philosophy in the Catholic Tradition |date=2022 |publisher=Catholic University of America Press |isbn=978-0-8132-3465-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Kw9sEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA23 |access-date=7 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Janaway |first1=C. |chapter=Aesthetics, History of |editor1-last=Honderich |editor1-first=Ted |title=The Oxford Companion to Philosophy |date=2005 |publisher=Oxford University Press |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/HONTOC-2 |access-date=2 January 2022 |archive-date=29 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210129082636/https://philpapers.org/rec/HONTOC-2 |url-status=live |isbn=978-0-19-926479-7 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Jaroszyński |first1=Piotr |title=Metaphysics or Ontology? |date=2018 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-35987-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fsZKDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA12 |access-date=7 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Jeanes |first1=Emma |title=A Dictionary of Organizational Behaviour |date=2019 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-252756-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BNUBEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT66 |access-date=6 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Jenicek |first1=Milos |title=How to Think in Medicine: Reasoning, Decision Making, and Communication in Health Sciences and Professions |date=2018 |publisher=CRC Press |isbn=978-1-351-68402-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kWC1DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA31 |access-date=5 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Jha |first1=Meenakshi |title=Subaltern Saints in India: Women and Sudras in Bhakti Movement |date=2022 |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |isbn=978-81-208-4299-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4gdoEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA217 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Jiang |first1=Xinyan |chapter=Enlightenment Movement |editor1-last=Mou |editor1-first=Bo |title=History of Chinese Philosophy |date=2009 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-203-00286-5 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Johnson |first1=Ralph H. |title=The Relation Between Formal and Informal Logic |journal=Argumentation |year=1999 |volume=13 |issue=3 |pages=265–274 |doi=10.1023/A:1007789101256 |s2cid=141283158 |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/JOHTRB-2 |access-date=2 January 2022 |archive-date=7 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211207184706/https://philpapers.org/rec/JOHTRB-2 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Johnson-Laird |first1=Phil |title=Deductive Reasoning |journal=WIREs Cognitive Science |date=2009 |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=8–17 |doi=10.1002/wcs.20 |pmid=26272833 |url=https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wcs.20 |issn=1939-5078 |access-date=17 July 2023 |archive-date=24 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230124120447/https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wcs.20 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Johnstone |first1=Albert A. |title=Rationalized Epistemology: Taking Solipsism Seriously |date=1991 |publisher=State University of New York Press |isbn=978-0-7914-0787-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IBbQtkyrLE4C&pg=PA52 |access-date=14 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Joll |first1=Nicholas |title=Metaphilosophy |url=https://iep.utm.edu/con-meta/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=1 February 2022 |archive-date=15 May 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190515174423/https://www.iep.utm.edu/con-meta/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Jones |first1=Campbell |last2=Bos |first2=René ten |title=Philosophy and Organization |date=2007 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-134-19659-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=g6x_AgAAQBAJ&pg=PT56 |access-date=6 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Kakas |first1=Antonis C. |last2=Sadri |first2=Fariba |title=Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond: Essays in Honour of Robert A. Kowalski, Part II |date=2003 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-3-540-45632-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wQVqCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA588 |access-date=6 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Kaminski |first1=Joseph J. |title=The Contemporary Islamic Governed State: A Reconceptualization |date=2017 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-3-319-57012-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KDUyDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA32 |access-date=30 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Kane |first1=Robert |chapter=Free Will |editor-last1=Kim |editor-first1=Jaekwon |editor-last2=Sosa |editor-first2=Ernest |editor-last3=Rosenkrantz |editor-first3=Gary S. |title=A Companion to Metaphysics |date=2009 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-4443-0853-2 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=i7PG-Vk824UC&pg=PA22 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Kant |first1=Immanuel |title=Lectures on Logic |year=1992 |orig-year=1800 |translator=J. Michael Young |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-36013-5 }}
* {{cite book |last=Kant |first=Immanuel |year=1998 |title=Critique of Pure Reason |editor=Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood |translator=Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-35402-8 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Kasulis |first1=Thomas P. |title=Japanese philosophy |url=https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/overview/japanese-philosophy/v-1 |encyclopedia=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Routledge |access-date=7 November 2023 |date=1998 |archive-date=7 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231107125041/https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/overview/japanese-philosophy/v-1 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Kasulis |first1=Thomas P. |title=Japanese Philosophy |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/japanese-philosophy |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=7 November 2023 |date=2022 |archive-date=8 August 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230808101349/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/japanese-philosophy/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |editor1-last=Kelly |editor1-first=Michael |title=Encyclopedia of Aesthetics |date=1998 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-511307-5 }}
* {{cite book |last=Kenny |first=Anthony |year=2004 |title=A New History of Western Philosophy, vol.1: Ancient Philosophy |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-875272-1 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Kenny |first1=Anthony |title=The Rise of Modern Philosophy |date=2006 |publisher=Clarendon Press |isbn=978-0-19-875277-6 |series=A new history of Western philosophy }}
* {{cite book |last1=Kenny |first1=Anthony |title=An Illustrated Brief History of Western Philosophy, 20th Anniversary Edition |date=2018 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-119-45279-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fn9xDwAAQBAJ&pg=PR20 |access-date=5 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Kim |first1=Sungmoon |title=Theorizing Confucian Virtue Politics: The Political Philosophy of Mencius and Xunzi |date=2019 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-57739-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ckG8DwAAQBAJ |access-date=14 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Kitcher |first1=Philip S. |title=Philosophy of Science |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/philosophy-of-science |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date=21 July 2023 |date=2023 |archive-date=29 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230629122627/https://www.britannica.com/topic/philosophy-of-science |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Koslowski |first1=Barbara |title=International Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning |date=2017 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-315-72569-7 |chapter-url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315725697-20/abductive-reasoning-explanation-barbara-koslowski |chapter=Abductive Reasoning and Explanation |doi=10.4324/9781315725697 |access-date=17 July 2023 |archive-date=8 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220108225144/https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315725697-20/abductive-reasoning-explanation-barbara-koslowski |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Kuhlmann |first1=Meinard |editor-last1=Sandkühler |editor-first1=Hans Jörg |encyclopedia=Enzyklopädie Philosophie |date=2010 |publisher=Meiner |isbn=978-3-7873-3545-9 |title=Ontologie: 4.2.1 Einzeldinge und Universalien |language=de }}
* {{cite book |last1=Kulke |first1=Hermann |last2=Rothermund |first2=Dietmar |title=A History of India |date=1998 |publisher=Psychology Press |isbn=978-0-415-15482-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=V0GEtXp-GsUC&pg=PA139 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Laerke |first1=Mogens |last2=Smith |first2=Justin E. H. |last3=Schliesser |first3=Eric |title=Philosophy and Its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy |date=2013 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-985716-6 }}
* {{cite book |editor1-last=Lagerlund |editor1-first=Henrik |title=Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy: Philosophy Between 500 and 1500 |date=2020 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-94-024-1663-3 |edition=2nd }}
* {{cite book |last1=Lambert |first1=Joseph |title=Translation Ethics |date=2023 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |isbn=978-1-000-84163-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gNytEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT26 |access-date=6 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Lazerowitz |first1=Morris |last2=Ambrose |first2=Alice |title=Philosophical Theories |date=2012 |publisher=Walter de Gruyter |isbn=978-3-11-080708-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LupI-JzfRZAC&pg=PA9 |access-date=5 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Legg |first1=Catherine |last2=Hookway |first2=Christopher |title=Pragmatism |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pragmatism/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=22 February 2022 |date=2021 |archive-date=8 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201008130434/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pragmatism/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Li |first1=Wei |title=Mathematical Logic: Foundations for Information Science |date=2014 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-3-0348-0862-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_ZQ9BQAAQBAJ&pg=PR9 |access-date=6 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Lippert-Rasmussen |first1=Kasper |chapter=The Nature of Applied Philosophy |editor1-last=Lippert-Rasmussen |editor1-first=Kasper |editor2-last=Brownlee |editor2-first=Kimberley |editor3-last=Coady |editor3-first=David |title=A Companion to Applied Philosophy |date=2017 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-118-86911-6 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Little |first1=Daniel |title=Reflective Equilibrium and Justification |journal=Southern Journal of Philosophy |date=1984 |volume=22 |issue=3 |pages=373–387 |doi=10.1111/j.2041-6962.1984.tb00354.x |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/LITREA-2 |access-date=18 April 2022 |archive-date=1 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220501081117/https://philpapers.org/rec/LITREA-2 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Littlejohn |first1=Ronnie |title=Chinese Philosophy: Overview of History |url=https://iep.utm.edu/chinese-philosophy-overview-of-history/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=12 June 2023 |date=2023 |archive-date=1 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230601185554/https://iep.utm.edu/chinese-philosophy-overview-of-history/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Livingston |first1=Paul M. |title=Twentieth-century philosophy |url=https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/overview/twentieth-century-philosophy/v-1/sections/analytic-and-continental-philosophy |encyclopedia=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Routledge |date=2017 |access-date=14 November 2023 |archive-date=14 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231114123505/https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/overview/twentieth-century-philosophy/v-1/sections/analytic-and-continental-philosophy |url-status=live }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Lockie |first1=Robert |title=Is Philosophy Useless? |journal=The Philosophers' Magazine |date=2015 |issue=71 |pages=24–28 |doi=10.5840/tpm20157197 |url=http://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1759/1/71%20opinion%20Is%20Philosophy%20Useless%20Lockie%20jg.doc |access-date=11 July 2023 |archive-date=11 August 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230811114800/http://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1759/1/71%20opinion%20Is%20Philosophy%20Useless%20Lockie%20jg.doc |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Long |first1=A. A. |title=Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics |date=1986 |publisher=University of California Press |isbn=978-0-520-05808-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3s6DILqP1MwC |access-date=28 May 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Losee |first1=John |title=A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science |date=2001 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-870055-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lQN6DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA1 |access-date=21 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Louth |first1=Andrew |author-link1=Andrew Louth |last2=Thielicke |first2=Helmut |author-link2=Helmut Thielicke |year=2014 |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/theology/Relationship-to-philosophy |title=Relationship to Philosophy Theology |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806161549/https://www.britannica.com/topic/theology/Relationship-to-philosophy |archive-date=6 August 2020 |url-status=live |access-date=10 November 2023 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Lowe |first1=E. Jonathan |title=An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind |date=2000 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-65428-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mH12kYm1RKAC&pg=PA1 |access-date=19 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Lowe |first1=E. Jonathan |chapter=Particulars and Non-particulars |editor1-last=Honderich |editor1-first=Ted |title=The Oxford Companion to Philosophy |date=2005 |publisher=Oxford University Press |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/HONTOC-2 |access-date=2 January 2022 |archive-date=29 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210129082636/https://philpapers.org/rec/HONTOC-2 |url-status=live |isbn=978-0-19-926479-7 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Ma |first1=Licheng |title=Leading Schools of Thought in Contemporary China |date=2015 |publisher=World Scientific |isbn=978-981-4656-40-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kFoGCwAAQBAJ&pg=PR14 |access-date=23 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=MacDonald |first1=Scott |last2=Kretzmann |first2=Norman |encyclopedia=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |date=1998 |publisher=Routledge |url=https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/overview/medieval-philosophy/v-1 |title=Medieval philosophy |access-date=28 May 2023 |archive-date=9 May 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230509003618/https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/overview/medieval-philosophy/v-1 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Maddy |first1=Penelope |title=A Plea for Natural Philosophy: And Other Essays |date=2022 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-750885-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6_dQEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA24 |access-date=25 August 2023 |author-link1=Penelope Maddy }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Maffie |first1=James |title=Aztec Philosophy |url=https://iep.utm.edu/aztec-philosophy/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=14 November 2023 |archive-date=12 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230112180429/https://iep.utm.edu/aztec-philosophy/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Makeham |first1=J. |title=New Confucianism: A Critical Examination |date=2003 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-1-4039-8241-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6TCBDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA94 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Mangena |first1=Fainos |title=Hunhu/Ubuntu in Traditional Southern African Thought |url=https://iep.utm.edu/hunhu-ubuntu-southern-african-thought/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=7 November 2023 |archive-date=7 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231107125041/https://iep.utm.edu/hunhu-ubuntu-southern-african-thought/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Marenbon |first1=John |title=Medieval Philosophy |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/medieval-philosophy/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=27 May 2023 |date=2023 |archive-date=26 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230326024717/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/medieval-philosophy/ }}
* {{cite book |last1=Marshev |first1=Vadim I. |title=History of Management Thought: Genesis and Development From Ancient Origins to the Present Day |date=2021 |publisher=Springer Nature |isbn=978-3-030-62337-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DPQTEAAAQBAJ |access-date=21 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |title=Epistemology |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/epistemology |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date=22 June 2020 |archive-date=10 July 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190710175341/https://www.britannica.com/topic/epistemology |url-status=live |last1=Martinich |first1=A. P. |last2=Stroll |first2=Avrum |date=2023 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Masud |first1=Muhammad Khalid |title=Islam and Modernity: Key Issues and Debates |date=2009 |publisher=Edinburgh University Press |isbn=978-0-7486-3794-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LxKrBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA237 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=McAfee |first1=Noëlle |title=Feminist Philosophy |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-philosophy/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=8 July 2023 |date=2018 |archive-date=22 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230622032832/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-philosophy/ |url-status=live |author-link1=Noëlle McAfee }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=McAfee |first1=Noëlle |last2=Garry |first2=Ann |last3=Superson |first3=Anita |last4=Grasswick |first4=Heidi |last5=Khader |first5=Serene |title=Feminist Philosophy |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-philosophy/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=6 November 2023 |date=2023 |author-link1=Noëlle McAfee |author-link2=Ann Garry |author-link3=Anita Superson |author-link5=Serene Khader |archive-date=22 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230622032832/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-philosophy/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=McCutcheon |first1=Russell T. |title=Studying Religion: An Introduction |date=2014 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-49166-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vpzCBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA26 |access-date=10 November 2023 }} {{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=McDermid |first1=Douglas |title=Pragmatism |url=https://iep.utm.edu/pragmati/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=22 February 2022 |archive-date=23 May 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190523181337/https://www.iep.utm.edu/pragmati/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=McKeon |first1=R. |title=New Catholic Encyclopedia |publisher=Gale Research Inc |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/methodology-philosophy |chapter=Methodology (Philosophy) |access-date=18 April 2022 |archive-date=30 April 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220430192230/https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/methodology-philosophy |url-status=live |date=2002 |isbn=978-0-7876-4004-0 }}
* {{cite book |last1=McQueen |first1=Paddy |title=Key Concepts in Philosophy |date=2010 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing |isbn=978-1-137-09339-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ho5KEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA162 |access-date=21 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=McQuillan |first1=J. Colin |title=Early Modern Aesthetics |date=2015 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |isbn=978-1-78348-213-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NObaDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA122 |access-date=21 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Meister |first1=Chad |title=Philosophy of Religion |url=https://iep.utm.edu/religion/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=21 July 2023 |archive-date=6 August 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230806025455/https://iep.utm.edu/religion/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Menon |first1=Sangeetha |title=Vedanta, Advaita |url=https://iep.utm.edu/advaita-vedanta/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=16 June 2023 |archive-date=1 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230601163706/https://iep.utm.edu/advaita-vedanta/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Mehrtens |first1=Arnd |editor1-last=Sandkühler |editor1-first=Hans Jörg |title=Enzyklopädie Philosophie |date=2010 |publisher=Meiner |url=https://meiner.de/enzyklopadie-philosophie-14071.html |chapter=Methode/Methodologie |access-date=15 February 2022 |archive-date=20 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220320211323/https://meiner.de/enzyklopadie-philosophie-14071.html |url-status=live |isbn=978-3-7873-3545-9 |language=de }}
* {{cite book |last=Mill |first=John Stuart |title=Utilitarianism |url=https://en.wikisource.org/Utilitarianism/Chapter_4 |year=1863 |publisher=Parker, Son, and Bourn |oclc=78070085 |access-date=5 November 2022 |archive-date=5 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221105093037/https://en.wikisource.org/Utilitarianism/Chapter_4 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Mitias |first1=Michael H. |title=The Philosophical Novel as a Literary Genre |date=11 March 2022 |publisher=Springer Nature |isbn=978-3-030-97385-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sORjEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA3 |access-date=4 December 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Mittelstraß |first1=Jürgen |encyclopedia=Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie |date=2005 |publisher=Metzler |url=https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783476021083 |title=Philosophie |access-date=27 February 2022 |archive-date=20 October 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211020080039/https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783476021083 |url-status=live |isbn=978-3-476-02107-6 |language=de }}
* {{cite book |last1=Moaddel |first1=Mansoor |title=Islamic Modernism, Nationalism, and Fundamentalism: Episode and Discourse |date=2005 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=978-0-226-53333-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Dk6BLopmn3gC&pg=PA1 |access-date=23 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Molefe |first1=Motsamai |last2=Allsobrook |first2=Christopher |title=Towards an African Political Philosophy of Needs |date=2021 |publisher=Springer Nature |isbn=978-3-030-64496-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wKQeEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA8 |access-date=21 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Morujão |first1=Carlos |last2=Dimas |first2=Samuel |last3=Relvas |first3=Susana |title=The Philosophy of Ortega y Gasset Reevaluated |date=7 September 2021 |publisher=Springer Nature |isbn=978-3-030-79249-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ed5BEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA105 |access-date=4 December 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Moseley |first1=Alexander |title=Political Philosophy: Methodology |url=https://iep.utm.edu/polphil/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=21 July 2023 |archive-date=2 April 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090402104628/http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/polphil.htm |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last=Mulvaney |first=Robert J. |year=2009 |title=Classical Philosophical Questions |publisher=Prentice Hall |isbn=978-0-13-600652-7 |edition=13th }}
* {{cite book |last1=Murphy |first1=P. Karen |title=Rediscovering the Philosophical Roots of Educational Psychology: A Special Issue of educational Psychologist |date=2018 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-135-06617-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qmUPEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA138 |access-date=14 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Nado |first1=Jennifer |title=How to Think About Philosophical Methodology |journal=Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research |date=2017 |volume=34 |issue=3 |pages=447–463 |doi=10.1007/s40961-017-0116-8 |s2cid=171569977 |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40961-017-0116-8 |issn=2363-9962 |access-date=18 April 2022 |archive-date=7 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220307124006/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40961-017-0116-8 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Nagel |first1=Thomas |title=Encyclopedia of Philosophy |editor1-last=Borchert |editor1-first=Donald M. |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 3: Determinables–Fuzzy Logic |date=2006 |publisher=Thomson Gale, Macmillan Reference |isbn=978-0-02-866072-1 |edition=2nd |chapter=Ethics }}
* {{cite book |last=Nanay |first=Bence |year=2019 |title=Aesthetics: A Very Short Introduction |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-882661-3 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Nasr |first1=Seyyed Hossein |last2=Leaman |first2=Oliver |title=History of Islamic Philosophy |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-78043-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uPWLvDmhaIsC |access-date=7 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Nasr |first1=Seyyed Hossein |title=Islamic Philosophy From Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the Land of Prophecy |date=2006 |publisher=State University of New York Press |isbn=978-0-7914-6800-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wankwAEACAAJ |access-date=7 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last=Newton-Smith |first=W. H. |editor=W. H. Newton-Smith |year=2000 |chapter=Introduction |title=A Companion to the Philosophy of Science |publisher=Blackwell |isbn=978-0-631-23020-5 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Nievergelt |first1=Yves |title=Logic, Mathematics, and Computer Science: Modern Foundations With Practical Applications |date=2015 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-1-4939-3222-1 |edition=2nd }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Nunes |first1=Terezinha |editor1-last=Seel |editor1-first=Norbert M. |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning |date=2011 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-1-4419-1427-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xZuSxo4JxoAC |title=Logical Reasoning and Learning |access-date=17 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Nuttall |first1=Jon |title=An Introduction to Philosophy |date=2013 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-0-7456-6807-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=luc-Hf_bEOIC |chapter=1. The Nature of Philosophy |access-date=15 February 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite dictionary |url=https://www.oed.com/dictionary/philosophy_n?tab=factsheet#30785611 |dictionary=Oxford English Dictionary |date=2022 |publisher=Oxford University Press |edition=3rd |title=Philosophy, n. |access-date=10 November 2023 |archive-date=23 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231123161906/https://www.oed.com/dictionary/philosophy_n?tab=factsheet&tl=true#30785611 |url-status=live |ref={{sfnref|OED staff|2022}} }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Olsson |first1=Erik |title=Coherentist Theories of Epistemic Justification |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justep-coherence/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=5 September 2023 |date=2021 |archive-date=13 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230213221516/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justep-coherence/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite dictionary |title=Philosophy |url=https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/philosophy |date=2020 |dictionary=Lexico |publisher=University of Oxford Press |access-date=28 March 2019 |archive-date=28 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190328142405/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/philosophy |url-status=dead |ref={{sfnref|OUP Staff|2020}} }}
* {{cite book |last1=Overgaard |first1=Søren |last2=D'Oro |first2=Giuseppina |title=The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology |date=2017 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-54736-0 |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-philosophical-methodology/introduction/03C3CBE35E1E1FD54E29AD2D5E1C4D48 |chapter=Introduction |access-date=18 April 2022 |archive-date=1 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220501081115/https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-philosophical-methodology/introduction/03C3CBE35E1E1FD54E29AD2D5E1C4D48 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Overgaard |first1=Søren |last2=Gilbert |first2=Paul |last3=Burwood |first3=Stephen |title=An Introduction to Metaphilosophy |date=2013 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-19341-2 |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/an-introduction-to-metaphilosophy/what-is-philosophy/9D6F6F1186D1FF68A23B97B17CC810EE |chapter=What Is Philosophy? |access-date=15 February 2022 |archive-date=14 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220214234944/https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/an-introduction-to-metaphilosophy/what-is-philosophy/9D6F6F1186D1FF68A23B97B17CC810EE |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Palmquist |first1=Stephen |title=Cultivating Personhood: Kant and Asian Philosophy |date=2010 |publisher=Walter de Gruyter |isbn=978-3-11-022623-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NOKjGp7NHtUC&pg=PA800 |access-date=5 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last=Papineau |first=David |editor-first=Ted |editor-last=Honderich |year=2005 |chapter=Science, Problems of the Philosophy of |title=The Oxford Companion to Philosophy |edition=2nd |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-926479-7 |access-date=13 July 2023 |url=https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199264797.001.0001/acref-9780199264797-e-2279 |archive-date=23 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231123161944/https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780199264797.001.0001/acref-9780199264797-e-2279 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Papineau |first1=David |title=Naturalism |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/naturalism/#MetNat |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=5 November 2023 |date=2023 |archive-date=26 April 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180426123419/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/naturalism/#MetNat |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Parker-Ryan |first1=Sally |title=Ordinary Language Philosophy |url=https://iep.utm.edu/ord-lang/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=28 February 2022 |archive-date=7 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220307123951/https://iep.utm.edu/ord-lang/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |editor1-last=Parkinson |editor-first1=G. H. R. |title=IV. The Renaissance and Seventeenth-Century Rationalism |date=2005 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-203-02914-5 |series=Routledge History of Philosophy }}
* {{cite book |last1=Perkins |first1=Dorothy |title=Encyclopedia of China: History and Culture |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-135-93562-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KMQeAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA486 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Perrett |first1=Roy W. |title=An Introduction to Indian Philosophy |date=2016 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-85356-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=q7wwCwAAQBAJ |access-date=9 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Perry |first1=John |last2=Bratman |first2=Michael |last3=Fischer |first3=John Martin |title=Introduction to Philosophy: Classical and Contemporary Readings |date=2010 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-539036-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0ndAAQAAIAAJ |edition=5th |access-date=9 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Phillips |first1=D. C. |chapter=What Is Philosophy of Education? |editor-last1=Bailey |editor-first1=Richard |editor-last2=Barrow |editor-first2=Robin |editor-last3=Carr |editor-first3=David |editor-last4=McCarthy |editor-first4=Christine |title=The SAGE Handbook of Philosophy of Education |date=2010 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-1-4462-0697-3 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FI02oTvjkV8C&pg=PA16 |access-date=21 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Phillips |first1=Stephen H. |title=Classical Indian Metaphysics: Refutations of Realism and the Emergence of New Logic |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |isbn=978-81-208-1488-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z02WEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA324 |date=1998 |access-date=29 March 2024 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Pipes |first1=Richard |chapter=Reflections on the Russian Revolution |editor1-last=Stockdale |editor1-first=Melissa K. |title=Readings on the Russian Revolution |date=2020 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing |isbn=978-1-350-03743-4 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aXX0DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA29 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |author1=Plato |translator1-last=Jowett |translator1-first=Benjamin |title=Dialogues |publisher=Standard Ebooks |chapter=Apology |date=2023 |orig-date=1871 |url=https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/plato/dialogues/benjamin-jowett/text/apology#apology-text |access-date=14 November 2023 |archive-date=14 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231114084819/https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/plato/dialogues/benjamin-jowett/text/apology#apology-text |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last=Pojman |first=Louis P. |editor1-last=Pojman |editor1-first=Louis P. |editor2-last=Vaughn |editor2-first=Lewis |title=Philosophy: The Quest for Truth |edition=7th |year=2009 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-998108-3 |chapter=I. What Is Philosophy? }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Polger |first1=Thomas W. |title=Functionalism |url=https://iep.utm.edu/functism/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=19 July 2023 |archive-date=19 May 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190519120233/https://www.iep.utm.edu/functism/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Pooley |first1=Jefferson D. |last2=Rothenbuhler |first2=Eric W. |title=The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, 4 Volume Set |date=2016 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-118-29073-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eY_2DQAAQBAJ |access-date=16 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Pratt |first1=Menah |editor1-last=Grant |editor1-first=Alec |title=Writing Philosophical Autoethnography |date=15 September 2023 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |isbn=978-1-000-95761-7 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FCHMEAAAQBAJ&pg=RA4-PT31 |chapter=The Personal Evolution of a Critical Black Girl Feminist Identity: A Philosophical Autoethnographic Journey |access-date=4 December 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Qi |first1=Xiaoying |title=Globalized Knowledge Flows and Chinese Social Theory |date=2014 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-134-69162-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nxWkAgAAQBAJ |access-date=14 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Quinton |first1=Anthony Meredith |chapter=Philosophy |editor1-last=Honderich |editor1-first=Ted |title=The Oxford Companion to Philosophy |date=2005 |publisher=Oxford University Press |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/HONTOC-2 |access-date=2 January 2022 |archive-date=29 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210129082636/https://philpapers.org/rec/HONTOC-2 |url-status=live |isbn=978-0-19-926479-7 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Rambachan |first1=Anantanand |title=The Limits of Scripture: Vivekananda's Reinterpretation of the Vedas |date=1994 |publisher=University of Hawaii Press |isbn=978-0-8248-1542-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=b9EJBQG3zqUC |access-date=16 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last=Ramos |first=Christine Carmela R. |title=Introduction to Philosophy |publisher=Rex Bookstore, Inc. |date=2004 |isbn=978-971-23-3955-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=y2XkGpGBzbsC&pg=PA4 |access-date=21 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Ranganathan |first1=Shyam |title=Ramanuja |url=https://iep.utm.edu/ramanuja/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=7 September 2023 |archive-date=12 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200212154759/https://www.iep.utm.edu/ramanuja/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Redse |first1=Arne |title='Justification by Grace Alone' Facing Confucian Self-Cultivation: The Christian Doctrine of Justification Contextualized to New Confucianism |date=2015 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-30258-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Dqq8CgAAQBAJ |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Regenbogen |first1=Arnim |editor-last1=Sandkühler |editor-first1=Hans Jörg |encyclopedia=Enzyklopädie Philosophie |date=2010 |publisher=Meiner |url=https://meiner.de/enzyklopadie-philosophie-14071.html |title=Philosophiebegriffe |access-date=15 February 2022 |archive-date=20 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220320211323/https://meiner.de/enzyklopadie-philosophie-14071.html |url-status=live |language=de }}
* {{cite book |last1=Rescher |first1=Nicholas |title=Metaphilosophy: Philosophy in Philosophical Perspective |date=2014 |publisher=Lexington Books |isbn=978-0-7391-9978-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2yEvBQAAQBAJ |access-date=15 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Rescher |first1=Nicholas |title=On the Nature of Philosophy and Other Philosophical Essays |date=2013 |publisher=Walter de Gruyter |isbn=978-3-11-032020-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RIx_k41e1xAC |chapter=1. The Nature of Philosophy |access-date=15 February 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Reynolds |first1=Jack |title=Common Sense and Philosophical Methodology: Some Metaphilosophical Reflections on Analytic Philosophy and Deleuze |journal=The Philosophical Forum |date=2010 |volume=41 |issue=3 |pages=231–258 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-9191.2010.00361.x |hdl=10536/DRO/DU:30061043 |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9191.2010.00361.x |issn=0031-806X |access-date=18 April 2022 |archive-date=7 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220307124917/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9191.2010.00361.x |url-status=live |hdl-access=free }}
* {{cite book |last1=Rickles |first1=Dean |title=What Is Philosophy of Science? |date=2020 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-5095-3418-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rSrfDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT9 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last=Riedel |first=Tom |url=http://www.arlisna.org/artdoc/vol18/iss2/01.pdf |title= Encyclopedia of Aesthetics |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060213170636/http://www.arlisna.org/artdoc/vol18/iss2/01.pdf |archive-date=13 February 2006 |journal=Art Documentation |volume=18 |issue=2 |date=1999 |doi=10.1086/adx.18.2.27949030 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Rini |first1=Regina A. |title=Morality and Cognitive Science |url=https://iep.utm.edu/m-cog-sc/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=7 September 2023 |archive-date=7 September 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230907173628/https://iep.utm.edu/m-cog-sc/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Rivera Berruz |first1=Stephanie |title=The Quest for Recognition: the Case of Latin American Philosophy |journal=Comparative Philosophy |date=2019 |volume=10 |issue=2 |doi=10.31979/2151-6014(2019).100206 |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Rizvi |first1=Sajjad |title=Mulla Sadra |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mulla-sadra/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=8 June 2023 |date=2021 |archive-date=27 May 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230527151936/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mulla-sadra/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Robertson Ishii |first1=Teresa |last2=Atkins |first2=Philip |title=Essential vs. Accidental Properties |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/essential-accidental/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=16 July 2023 |date=2023 |at=Lead Section |archive-date=10 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220710185333/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/essential-accidental/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Rosenberg |first1=Alex |title=Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-134-74350-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VAzy5bGCcs0C&pg=PA129 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Ruether |first1=Rosemary Radford |title=Integrating Ecofeminism, Globalization, and World Religions |date=2004 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers |isbn=978-1-4616-3822-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MQFvAAAAQBAJ |access-date=10 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Russell |first1=Bertrand |title=The Problems of Philosophy |date=1912 |oclc=542749 |publisher=H. Holt and Company }}
* {{cite book |last1=Russell |first1=Gillian |last2=Fara |first2=Delia Graff |title=Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-59407-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=czr880lvAPIC&pg=PR2 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Safi |first1=Omid |title=Encyclopedia of Religion |date=2005 |publisher=Macmillan Reference USA |isbn=978-0-02-865733-2 |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/modernism-islamic-modernism |chapter=Modernism: Islamic Modernism |access-date=10 November 2023 |archive-date=23 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231123161901/https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/modernism-islamic-modernism |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Santinello |first1=Giovanni |last2=Piaia |first2=Gregorio |title=Models of the History of Philosophy: Volume II: From Cartesian Age to Brucker |date=2010 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-90-481-9507-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gC2J3V7_TPUC |access-date=30 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Sartwell |first1=Crispin |title=Beauty |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/beauty/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=21 July 2023 |date=2022 |at=Lead Section, 1. Objectivity and Subjectivity |archive-date=26 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220226100643/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/beauty/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Sayre-McCord |first1=Geoff |title=Metaethics |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaethics/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=1 November 2023 |date=2023 |archive-date=12 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230712062506/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaethics/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Scharfstein |first1=Ben-Ami |title=A Comparative History of World Philosophy: From the Upanishads to Kant |date=1998 |publisher=State University of New York Press |isbn=978-0-7914-3683-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iZQy2lu70bwC |access-date=30 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Schroeder |first=Mark |title=Value Theory |date=2021 |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/value-theory/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |edition=Spring 2021 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=27 March 2021 |archive-date=31 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210331093617/https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/value-theory/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Seshadri |first1=Kandadai |title=Ramanuja: Social Influence of His Life and Teaching |journal=Economic and Political Weekly |date=1996 |volume=31 |issue=5 |pages=292–298 |jstor=4403749 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4403749 |issn=0012-9976 |access-date=10 November 2023 |archive-date=21 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231021135309/https://www.jstor.org/stable/4403749 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Shaffer |first1=Michael J. |title=The Problem of Necessary and Sufficient Conditions and Conceptual Analysis |journal=Metaphilosophy |date=2015 |volume=46 |issue=4/5 |pages=555–563 |doi=10.1111/meta.12158 |jstor=26602327 |s2cid=148551744 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/26602327 |issn=0026-1068 |access-date=15 February 2022 |archive-date=13 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220213133747/https://www.jstor.org/stable/26602327 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Shand |first1=John |title=Fundamentals of Philosophy |date=2004 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-134-58831-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uoCh8mpbZO4C&pg=PA9 |access-date=21 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Sharpe |first1=Matthew |last2=Ure |first2=Michael |title=Philosophy as a Way of Life: History, Dimensions, Directions |date=2021 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing |isbn=978-1-350-10216-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LIstEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA76 |access-date=15 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Shaw |first1=Yu-ming |title=Changes and Continuities in Chinese Communism: Volume I: Ideology, Politics, and Foreign Policy |date=2019 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-429-71285-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=H7uZDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT124 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Shields |first1=Christopher |title=Aristotle |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=6 November 2023 |date=2022 |archive-date=26 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211226063824/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Shiraev |first1=Eric |title=A History of Psychology: A Global Perspective: A Global Perspective |date=2010 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-1-4129-7383-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=r4xBJXxnnx8C&pg=PA83 |access-date=19 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Kane |first1=Robert |chapter=7.1 Incompatibilism |editor-last1=Sider |editor-first1=Theodore |editor-last2=Hawthorne |editor-first2=John |editor-last3=Zimmerman |editor-first3=Dean W. |title=Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics |date=2013 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-118-71232-0 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LRV-Tzcry8EC&pg=RA3-PT258 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Silverman |first1=Hugh J. |last2=Welton |first2=Donn |title=Postmodernism and Continental Philosophy |date=1988 |publisher=State University of New York Press |isbn=978-0-88706-521-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pHd0VtVBn1UC&pg=PA5 |access-date=15 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Simpson |first1=John A. |title=Oxford English Dictionary: Version 3.0 : Upgrade Version |date=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-521889-3 |chapter=Philosophy }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Singer |first1=Marcus G. |title=The Many Methods of Sidgwick's Ethics |journal=Monist |date=1974 |volume=58 |issue=3 |pages=420–448 |doi=10.5840/monist197458326 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Singh |first1=Rana P. B. |chapter=3. Rethinking Development in India |editor-last1=Simon |editor-first1=David |editor-last2=Narman |editor-first2=Anders |title=Development as Theory and Practice: Current Perspectives on Development and Development Co-operation |date=2014 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-87658-8 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=d0CgBAAAQBAJ&pg=PT83 |access-date=14 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Slingerland |first1=Edward |title=Effortless Action: Wu-wei As Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China |date=2007 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-987457-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gSReaja3V3IC |access-date=30 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Smart |first1=Ninian |title=World Philosophies |date=2008 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-41188-2 |edition=Rev. 2nd }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Smith |first1=David Woodruff |title=Phenomenology: 1. What Is Phenomenology? |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology/#WhatPhen |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=20 September 2021 |date=2018 |archive-date=23 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200623203855/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology/#WhatPhen |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Smith |first1=Joel |title=Phenomenology |url=https://iep.utm.edu/phenom/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=10 October 2021 |archive-date=25 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200525234910/https://www.iep.utm.edu/phenom/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Smith |first1=Matthew J. |last2=Brown |first2=Matthew |last3=Duncan |first3=Randy |title=More Critical Approaches to Comics: Theories and Methods |date=2019 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-429-78275-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QkmqDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT174 |access-date=21 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Solomon |first1=Robert C. |last2=Higgins |first2=Kathleen M. |title=From Africa to Zen: An Invitation to World Philosophy |date=2003 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers |isbn=978-0-7425-8086-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gVgdAAAAQBAJ&pg=PR15 |access-date=19 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Stambaugh |first1=Joan |editor1-last=Eliade |editor1-first=Mircea |editor2-last=Adams |editor2-first=Charles J. |title=The Encyclopedia of Religion |date=1987 |publisher=Macmillan |isbn=978-0-02-909480-8 |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/philosophy-overview |chapter=Philosophy: An Overview |access-date=5 July 2023 |archive-date=30 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230630162728/https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/philosophy-overview |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Stehn |first1=Alexander V. |title=Latin American Philosophy |url=https://iep.utm.edu/latin-am/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=7 November 2023 |archive-date=1 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230601201527/https://iep.utm.edu/latin-am/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |title=Epistemology |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=30 June 2020 |archive-date=21 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200721023728/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/ |url-status=live |last1=Steup |first1=Matthias |last2=Neta |first2=Ram |date=2020 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Taliaferro |first1=Charles |title=Philosophy of Religion |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/philosophy-religion/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=6 September 2023 |date=2023 |archive-date=23 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231123162439/https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/philosophy-religion/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Ten |first1=C. L. |title=Routledge History of Philosophy: The nineteenth century |date=1999 |publisher=Psychology Press |isbn=978-0-415-05604-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=04yBhMdnd3MC&pg=PA9 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Tian |first1=Chenshan |chapter=Development of Dialectical Materialism in China |editor1-last=Mou |editor1-first=Bo |title=History of Chinese Philosophy |date=2009 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-203-00286-5 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Tieszen |first1=Richard L. |title=Phenomenology, Logic, and the Philosophy of Mathematics |date=2005 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-83782-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2fgQ_fuCcKAC&pg=PA100 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Truncellito |first1=David A. |title=Epistemology |url=https://iep.utm.edu/epistemo/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=14 July 2023 |archive-date=13 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220113223803/https://iep.utm.edu/epistemo/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Tully |first1=Robert |chapter=Logic, Informal |editor1-last=Honderich |editor1-first=Ted |title=The Oxford Companion to Philosophy |date=2005 |publisher=Oxford University Press |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/HONTOC-2 |access-date=2 January 2022 |archive-date=29 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210129082636/https://philpapers.org/rec/HONTOC-2 |url-status=live |isbn=978-0-19-926479-7 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Tuomela |first1=Raimo |title=Science, Action, and Reality |date=1985 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-90-277-2098-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2Hg9rKafnHsC&pg=PA1 |access-date=6 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Uniacke |first1=Suzanne |chapter=The Value of Applied Philosophy |editor1-last=Lippert-Rasmussen |editor1-first=Kasper |editor2-last=Brownlee |editor2-first=Kimberley |editor3-last=Coady |editor3-first=David |title=A Companion to Applied Philosophy |date=2017 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-118-86911-6 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Vallely |first1=Anne |chapter=Jainism |editor-last1=Juergensmeyer |editor-first1=Mark |editor-last2=Roof |editor-first2=Wade Clark |title=Encyclopedia of Global Religion |date=2012 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-0-7619-2729-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=B105DQAAQBAJ |access-date=10 June 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=van Inwagen |first1=Peter |last2=Sullivan |first2=Meghan |last3=Bernstein |first3=Sara |title=Metaphysics |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaphysics/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=6 September 2023 |date=2023 |archive-date=16 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180916103726/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaphysics/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Van Norden |first1=Bryan |title=Wang Yangming |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wang-yangming/#Infl |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=23 August 2023 |date=2022 |archive-date=1 May 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230501042635/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wang-yangming/#Infl |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Velleman |first1=Daniel J. |title=How to Prove It: A Structured Approach |date=2006 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-67599-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lptwaMuAtBAC&pg=PA8 |access-date=17 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Venturinha |first1=Nuno |title=The Textual Genesis of Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-17998-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Td3BAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA76 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Verene |first1=Donald Phillip |title=The History of Philosophy: A Reader's Guide |date=2008 |publisher=Northwestern University Press |isbn=978-0-8101-5197-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hkDX-dxMHpoC |access-date=25 May 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Vickers |first1=John M. |title=Inductive Reasoning |url=https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780195396577/obo-9780195396577-0171.xml |encyclopedia=Oxford Bibliographies |publisher=Oxford University Press |access-date=18 January 2023 |date=2022 |archive-date=29 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230329200504/https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780195396577/obo-9780195396577-0171.xml |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Vintiadis |first1=Elly |title=Philosophy by Women: 22 Philosophers Reflect on Philosophy and Its Value |date=2020 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-000-20324-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t8P4DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT137 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Vleet |first1=Jacob E. Van |title=Informal Logical Fallacies: A Brief Guide |date=2011 |publisher=University Press of America |isbn=978-0-7618-5433-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UCFYUGRG5dcC&pg=PR9 |access-date=17 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Waithe |first1=Mary Ellen |title=A History of Women Philosophers. 4: Contemporary Women Philosophers 1900 - today |date=1995 |publisher=Nijhoff |isbn=978-0-7923-2808-7 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Walsh |first1=Richard T. G. |last2=Teo |first2=Thomas |last3=Baydala |first3=Angelina |title=A Critical History and Philosophy of Psychology: Diversity of Context, Thought, and Practice |date=2014 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-87076-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8JxcAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA68 |access-date=10 November 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Walton |first1=Douglas |title=Formal and Informal Logic |editor-last1=Craig |editor-first1=Edward |encyclopedia=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |date=1996 |publisher=Routledge |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/BEAREO |access-date=29 December 2021 |archive-date=16 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210116111145/https://philpapers.org/rec/BEAREO |url-status=live |isbn=978-0-415-07310-3 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Wei |first1=Wang |title=Philosophy of Science: An Introduction to the Central Issues |date=2020 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-54231-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=U2wNEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA127 |access-date=21 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Wei-Ming |first1=Tu |title=Self-cultivation in Chinese Philosophy |url=https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/self-cultivation-in-chinese-philosophy/v-1 |encyclopedia=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Routledge |access-date=20 August 2023 |archive-date=20 August 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230820081451/https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/self-cultivation-in-chinese-philosophy/v-1 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Weir |first1=Ralph Stefan |title=The Mind-Body Problem and Metaphysics: An Argument From Consciousness to Mental Substance |date=2023 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |isbn=978-1-000-91432-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jUXAEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT10 |access-date=19 July 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Weisberg |first1=Josh |title=Hard Problem of Consciousness |url=https://iep.utm.edu/hard-problem-of-conciousness/ |encyclopedia=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=19 July 2023 |archive-date=19 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230719172212/https://iep.utm.edu/hard-problem-of-conciousness/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Williamson |first1=Timothy |title=Philosophical Method: A Very Short Introduction |chapter=1. Introduction |year=2020 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-184724-0 |url=https://www.veryshortintroductions.com/view/10.1093/actrade/9780198810001.001.0001/actrade-9780198810001-chapter-1 |access-date=18 April 2022 |archive-date=7 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220307131007/https://www.veryshortintroductions.com/view/10.1093/actrade/9780198810001.001.0001/actrade-9780198810001-chapter-1 |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Wiredu |first=Kwasi |chapter=Introduction: African Philosophy in Our Time |year=2005 |title=A Companion to African Philosophy |pages=1–27 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |doi=10.1002/9780470997154.ch1 |isbn=978-0-470-99715-4}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Wolf |first=Michael P. |year=2023 |title=Philosophy of Language |encyclopedia=The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |url=https://iep.utm.edu/lang-phi/ |access-date=13 July 2023 |archive-date=15 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230615132016/https://iep.utm.edu/lang-phi/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Wolff |first1=Jonathan |last2=Leopold |first2=David |title=Karl Marx |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/ |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=4 September 2023 |date=2021 |archive-date=16 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200116010243/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last=Wolff |first=Jonathan |year=2006 |title=An Introduction to Political Philosophy |edition=Rev. |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-965801-5 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Woollard |first1=Fiona |last2=Howard-Snyder |first2=Frances |title=Doing vs. Allowing Harm |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/doing-allowing/#TrolProb |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=7 September 2023 |date=2022 |archive-date=5 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231005193642/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/doing-allowing/#TrolProb |url-status=live }}
{{Refend}} {{Refend}}


== External links ==
===Anthologies===
<!--======================== {{No more links}} ============================
{{Refbegin|2}}
|PLEASE BE CAUTIOUS IN ADDING MORE LINKS TO THIS ARTICLE. Misplaced Pages |
* ''Classics of Philosophy (Vols. 1 & 2, 2nd edition)'' by Louis P. Pojman
|is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising. |
* ''Classics of Philosophy: The 20th Century (Vol. 3)'' by Louis P. Pojman
||
* ''The English Philosophers from Bacon to Mill'' by Edwin Arthur
|Excessive or inappropriate links WILL BE DELETED. |
* ''European Philosophers from Descartes to Nietzsche'' by Monroe Beardsley
|See ] & ] for details. |
* ''Contemporary Analytic Philosophy: Core Readings'' by James Baillie
||
* ''Existentialism: Basic Writings (Second Edition)'' by Charles Guignon, Derk Pereboom
|If there are already plentiful links, please propose additions or |
* ''The Phenomenology Reader'' by Dermot Moran, Timothy Mooney
|replacements on this article's discussion page, or submit your link |
* ''Medieval Islamic Philosophical Writings'' edited by Muhammad Ali Khalidi
|to the relevant category at the Open Directory Project (dmoz.org) |
* ''A Source Book in Indian Philosophy'' by Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, Charles A. Moore
|and link back to that category using the {{dmoz}} template. |
* ''A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy'' by ]
==={{No more links}}=========-->
* Kim, J. and Ernest Sosa, Ed. (1999). ''Metaphysics: An Anthology''. Blackwell Philosophy Anthologies. Oxford, Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
{{Library resources box |by=no |onlinebooks=yes |others=yes |about=yes |label=Philosophy}}
* ''The Oxford Handbook of Free Will'' (2004) edited by Robert Kane
* – a peer-reviewed online encyclopedia of philosophy
* Husserl, Edmund and Donn Welton (1999). ''The Essential Husserl: Basic Writings in Transcendental Phenomenology'', Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-21273-1
* – an online encyclopedia of philosophy maintained by ]
{{Refend}}
* – a comprehensive directory of online philosophical articles and books by academic philosophers
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240406115127/https://www.inphoproject.org/ |date=6 April 2024 }} – a model of relationships between philosophical ideas, thinkers, and journals


===Reference works===
{{Refbegin|2}}
* ''The Oxford Companion to Philosophy'' edited by Ted Honderich
* ''The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy'' by Robert Audi
* ''The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' (10 vols.) edited by Edward Craig, ] (available online by subscription); or
* ''The Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' edited by Edward Craig (an abridgement)
* ''Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' (8 vols.) edited by Paul Edwards; in 1996, a ninth supplemental volume appeared that updated the classic 1967 encyclopedia.
* '']''. Charlottesville, Philosophy Documentation Center.
* '']''. Charlottesville, Philosophy Documentation Center.
* ''Routledge History of Philosophy'' (10 vols.) edited by John Marenbon
* ''History of Philosophy'' (9 vols.) by ]
* ''A History of Western Philosophy'' (5 vols.) by W. T. Jones
* ''History of Italian Philosophy'' (2 vols.) by Eugenio Garin. Translated from Italian and Edited by Giorgio Pinton. Introduction by Leon Pompa.
* ''Encyclopaedia of Indian Philosophies'' (8 vols.), edited by Karl H. Potter et al. (first 6 volumes out of print)
* ''Indian Philosophy'' (2 vols.) by ]
* ''A History of Indian Philosophy'' (5 vols.) by Surendranath Dasgupta
* ''History of Chinese Philosophy'' (2 vols.) by Fung Yu-lan, Derk Bodde
* ''Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy'' edited by Antonio S. Cua
* ''Encyclopedia of Eastern Philosophy and Religion'' by Ingrid Fischer-Schreiber, Franz-Karl Ehrhard, Kurt Friedrichs
* ''Companion Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy'' by Brian Carr, Indira Mahalingam
* ''A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English'' by John A. Grimes
* ''History of Islamic Philosophy'' edited by Seyyed Hossein Nasr, Oliver Leaman
* ''History of Jewish Philosophy'' edited by Daniel H. Frank, Oliver Leaman
* ''A History of Russian Philosophy: From the Tenth to the Twentieth Centuries'' by Valerii Aleksandrovich Kuvakin
* Ayer, A.J. et al., Ed. (1994) ''A Dictionary of Philosophical Quotations''. Blackwell Reference Oxford. Oxford, Basil Blackwell Ltd.
* Blackburn, S., Ed. (1996)''The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy''. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
* Mauter, T., Ed. ''The Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy''. London, Penguin Books.
* Runes, D., Ed. (1942). . New York, The Philosophical Library, Inc.
* Angeles, P.A., Ed. (1992). ''The Harper Collins Dictionary of Philosophy''. New York, Harper Perennial.
* Bunnin, N. et al., Ed. (1996) ''The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy''. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Oxford, Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
* Hoffman, Eric, Ed. (1997) ''Guidebook for Publishing Philosophy''. Charlottesville, Philosophy Documentation Center.
* Popkin, R.H. (1999). ''The Columbia History of Western Philosophy''. New York, Columbia University Press.
{{Refend}}

==External links==
<!--======================== {{No more links}} ============================
| PLEASE BE CAUTIOUS IN ADDING MORE LINKS TO THIS ARTICLE. Misplaced Pages |
| is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising. |
| |
| Excessive or inappropriate links WILL BE DELETED. |
| See ] & ] for details. |
| |
| If there are already plentiful links, please propose additions or |
| replacements on this article's discussion page, or submit your link |
| to the relevant category at the Open Directory Project (dmoz.org) |
| and link back to that category using the {{dmoz}} template. |
======================= {{No more links}} =============================-->
{{Sister project links|wikt=philosophy|b=Subject:Philosophy|commons=Category:Philosophy|v=School:Philosophy}}
*
*
*
*
*
*
* {{dmoz|Society/Philosophy/}}
*
* OpenCourseWare from the ]
* Philosophy Library
*
*
*
{{Philosophy topics}} {{Philosophy topics}}
{{Humanities}}
<!-- Philosophy footer -->
{{Subject bar
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="text-align:center;"
|b = y
|-
|commons = y
| style="width:48px;"|
|commons-search = Category:Philosophy
|| {{Wikibarphilo}}
|d = y
|}
|n = y
<!-- Philosophy footer -->
|q = y
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2011}}
|s = y
|v = y
|v-search = School:Philosophy
|wikt = y
}}
{{Authority control}}


]<!-- Leave the empty space as per ]. -->
]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
]

{{Link GA|eo}}
{{Link FA|de}}
{{Link FA|hr}}
{{Link FA|is}}
{{Link FA|uz}}

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 09:36, 10 January 2025

Study of general and fundamental questions For other uses, see Philosophy (disambiguation).

Photo of Auguste Rodin's statue The Thinker
The statue The Thinker by Auguste Rodin is a symbol of philosophical thought.
Part of a series on
Philosophy
Philosophies
By period
By region
By religion
Branches
Philosophers

Philosophy ('love of wisdom' in Ancient Greek) is a systematic study of general and fundamental questions concerning topics like existence, reason, knowledge, value, mind, and language. It is a rational and critical inquiry that reflects on its methods and assumptions.

Historically, many of the individual sciences, such as physics and psychology, formed part of philosophy. However, they are considered separate academic disciplines in the modern sense of the term. Influential traditions in the history of philosophy include Western, Arabic–Persian, Indian, and Chinese philosophy. Western philosophy originated in Ancient Greece and covers a wide area of philosophical subfields. A central topic in Arabic–Persian philosophy is the relation between reason and revelation. Indian philosophy combines the spiritual problem of how to reach enlightenment with the exploration of the nature of reality and the ways of arriving at knowledge. Chinese philosophy focuses principally on practical issues about right social conduct, government, and self-cultivation.

Major branches of philosophy are epistemology, ethics, logic, and metaphysics. Epistemology studies what knowledge is and how to acquire it. Ethics investigates moral principles and what constitutes right conduct. Logic is the study of correct reasoning and explores how good arguments can be distinguished from bad ones. Metaphysics examines the most general features of reality, existence, objects, and properties. Other subfields are aesthetics, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, philosophy of religion, philosophy of science, philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of history, and political philosophy. Within each branch, there are competing schools of philosophy that promote different principles, theories, or methods.

Philosophers use a great variety of methods to arrive at philosophical knowledge. They include conceptual analysis, reliance on common sense and intuitions, use of thought experiments, analysis of ordinary language, description of experience, and critical questioning. Philosophy is related to many other fields, including the sciences, mathematics, business, law, and journalism. It provides an interdisciplinary perspective and studies the scope and fundamental concepts of these fields. It also investigates their methods and ethical implications.

Etymology

The word philosophy comes from the Ancient Greek words φίλος (philos) 'love' and σοφία (sophia) 'wisdom'. Some sources say that the term was coined by the pre-Socratic philosopher Pythagoras, but this is not certain.

Wood engraving of Isaac Newton under an apple tree
Physics was originally part of philosophy, like Isaac Newton's observation of how gravity affects falling apples.

The word entered the English language primarily from Old French and Anglo-Norman starting around 1175 CE. The French philosophie is itself a borrowing from the Latin philosophia. The term philosophy acquired the meanings of "advanced study of the speculative subjects (logic, ethics, physics, and metaphysics)", "deep wisdom consisting of love of truth and virtuous living", "profound learning as transmitted by the ancient writers", and "the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence, and the basic limits of human understanding".

Before the modern age, the term philosophy was used in a wide sense. It included most forms of rational inquiry, such as the individual sciences, as its subdisciplines. For instance, natural philosophy was a major branch of philosophy. This branch of philosophy encompassed a wide range of fields, including disciplines like physics, chemistry, and biology. An example of this usage is the 1687 book Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica by Isaac Newton. This book referred to natural philosophy in its title, but it is today considered a book of physics.

The meaning of philosophy changed toward the end of the modern period when it acquired the more narrow meaning common today. In this new sense, the term is mainly associated with philosophical disciplines like metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics. Among other topics, it covers the rational study of reality, knowledge, and values. It is distinguished from other disciplines of rational inquiry such as the empirical sciences and mathematics.

Conceptions of philosophy

See also: Metaphilosophy

General conception

The practice of philosophy is characterized by several general features: it is a form of rational inquiry, it aims to be systematic, and it tends to critically reflect on its own methods and presuppositions. It requires attentively thinking long and carefully about the provocative, vexing, and enduring problems central to the human condition.

The philosophical pursuit of wisdom involves asking general and fundamental questions. It often does not result in straightforward answers but may help a person to better understand the topic, examine their life, dispel confusion, and overcome prejudices and self-deceptive ideas associated with common sense. For example, Socrates stated that "the unexamined life is not worth living" to highlight the role of philosophical inquiry in understanding one's own existence. And according to Bertrand Russell, "the man who has no tincture of philosophy goes through life imprisoned in the prejudices derived from common sense, from the habitual beliefs of his age or his nation, and from convictions which have grown up in his mind without the cooperation or consent of his deliberate reason."

Academic definitions

Main article: Definitions of philosophy

Attempts to provide more precise definitions of philosophy are controversial and are studied in metaphilosophy. Some approaches argue that there is a set of essential features shared by all parts of philosophy. Others see only weaker family resemblances or contend that it is merely an empty blanket term. Precise definitions are often only accepted by theorists belonging to a certain philosophical movement and are revisionistic according to Søren Overgaard et al. in that many presumed parts of philosophy would not deserve the title "philosophy" if they were true.

Some definitions characterize philosophy in relation to its method, like pure reasoning. Others focus on its topic, for example, as the study of the biggest patterns of the world as a whole or as the attempt to answer the big questions. Such an approach is pursued by Immanuel Kant, who holds that the task of philosophy is united by four questions: "What can I know?"; "What should I do?"; "What may I hope?"; and "What is the human being?" Both approaches have the problem that they are usually either too wide, by including non-philosophical disciplines, or too narrow, by excluding some philosophical sub-disciplines.

Many definitions of philosophy emphasize its intimate relation to science. In this sense, philosophy is sometimes understood as a proper science in its own right. According to some naturalistic philosophers, such as W. V. O. Quine, philosophy is an empirical yet abstract science that is concerned with wide-ranging empirical patterns instead of particular observations. Science-based definitions usually face the problem of explaining why philosophy in its long history has not progressed to the same extent or in the same way as the sciences. This problem is avoided by seeing philosophy as an immature or provisional science whose subdisciplines cease to be philosophy once they have fully developed. In this sense, philosophy is sometimes described as "the midwife of the sciences".

Other definitions focus on the contrast between science and philosophy. A common theme among many such conceptions is that philosophy is concerned with meaning, understanding, or the clarification of language. According to one view, philosophy is conceptual analysis, which involves finding the necessary and sufficient conditions for the application of concepts. Another definition characterizes philosophy as thinking about thinking to emphasize its self-critical, reflective nature. A further approach presents philosophy as a linguistic therapy. According to Ludwig Wittgenstein, for instance, philosophy aims at dispelling misunderstandings to which humans are susceptible due to the confusing structure of ordinary language.

Phenomenologists, such as Edmund Husserl, characterize philosophy as a "rigorous science" investigating essences. They practice a radical suspension of theoretical assumptions about reality to get back to the "things themselves", that is, as originally given in experience. They contend that this base-level of experience provides the foundation for higher-order theoretical knowledge, and that one needs to understand the former to understand the latter.

An early approach found in ancient Greek and Roman philosophy is that philosophy is the spiritual practice of developing one's rational capacities. This practice is an expression of the philosopher's love of wisdom and has the aim of improving one's well-being by leading a reflective life. For example, the Stoics saw philosophy as an exercise to train the mind and thereby achieve eudaimonia and flourish in life.

History

Main article: History of philosophy

As a discipline, the history of philosophy aims to provide a systematic and chronological exposition of philosophical concepts and doctrines. Some theorists see it as a part of intellectual history, but it also investigates questions not covered by intellectual history such as whether the theories of past philosophers are true and have remained philosophically relevant. The history of philosophy is primarily concerned with theories based on rational inquiry and argumentation; some historians understand it in a looser sense that includes myths, religious teachings, and proverbial lore.

Influential traditions in the history of philosophy include Western, Arabic–Persian, Indian, and Chinese philosophy. Other philosophical traditions are Japanese philosophy, Latin American philosophy, and African philosophy.

Western

Main article: Western philosophy
Bust of Aristotle
Aristotle was a major figure in ancient philosophy and developed a comprehensive system of thought including metaphysics, logic, ethics, politics, and natural science.

Western philosophy originated in Ancient Greece in the 6th century BCE with the pre-Socratics. They attempted to provide rational explanations of the cosmos as a whole. The philosophy following them was shaped by Socrates (469–399 BCE), Plato (427–347 BCE), and Aristotle (384–322 BCE). They expanded the range of topics to questions like how people should act, how to arrive at knowledge, and what the nature of reality and mind is. The later part of the ancient period was marked by the emergence of philosophical movements, for example, Epicureanism, Stoicism, Skepticism, and Neoplatonism. The medieval period started in the 5th century CE. Its focus was on religious topics and many thinkers used ancient philosophy to explain and further elaborate Christian doctrines.

The Renaissance period started in the 14th century and saw a renewed interest in schools of ancient philosophy, in particular Platonism. Humanism also emerged in this period. The modern period started in the 17th century. One of its central concerns was how philosophical and scientific knowledge are created. Specific importance was given to the role of reason and sensory experience. Many of these innovations were used in the Enlightenment movement to challenge traditional authorities. Several attempts to develop comprehensive systems of philosophy were made in the 19th century, for instance, by German idealism and Marxism. Influential developments in 20th-century philosophy were the emergence and application of formal logic, the focus on the role of language as well as pragmatism, and movements in continental philosophy like phenomenology, existentialism, and post-structuralism. The 20th century saw a rapid expansion of academic philosophy in terms of the number of philosophical publications and philosophers working at academic institutions. There was also a noticeable growth in the number of female philosophers, but they still remained underrepresented.

Arabic–Persian

Main articles: Islamic philosophy and Iranian philosophy
Portrait of Avicenna on a Silver Vase
Portrait of Avicenna, one of the most influential philosophers of the Islamic Golden Age.

Arabic–Persian philosophy arose in the early 9th century CE as a response to discussions in the Islamic theological tradition. Its classical period lasted until the 12th century CE and was strongly influenced by ancient Greek philosophers. It employed their ideas to elaborate and interpret the teachings of the Quran.

Al-Kindi (801–873 CE) is usually regarded as the first philosopher of this tradition. He translated and interpreted many works of Aristotle and Neoplatonists in his attempt to show that there is a harmony between reason and faith. Avicenna (980–1037 CE) also followed this goal and developed a comprehensive philosophical system to provide a rational understanding of reality encompassing science, religion, and mysticism. Al-Ghazali (1058–1111 CE) was a strong critic of the idea that reason can arrive at a true understanding of reality and God. He formulated a detailed critique of philosophy and tried to assign philosophy a more limited place besides the teachings of the Quran and mystical insight. Following Al-Ghazali and the end of the classical period, the influence of philosophical inquiry waned. Mulla Sadra (1571–1636 CE) is often regarded as one of the most influential philosophers of the subsequent period. The increasing influence of Western thought and institutions in the 19th and 20th centuries gave rise to the intellectual movement of Islamic modernism, which aims to understand the relation between traditional Islamic beliefs and modernity.

Indian

Main article: Indian philosophy
Painting of Adi Shankara
Adi Shankara developed the monistic view of Advaita Vedanta, stating that the existence of a plurality of distinct entities is an illusion.

One of the distinguishing features of Indian philosophy is that it integrates the exploration of the nature of reality, the ways of arriving at knowledge, and the spiritual question of how to reach enlightenment. It started around 900 BCE when the Vedas were written. They are the foundational scriptures of Hinduism and contemplate issues concerning the relation between the self and ultimate reality as well as the question of how souls are reborn based on their past actions. This period also saw the emergence of non-Vedic teachings, like Buddhism and Jainism. Buddhism was founded by Gautama Siddhartha (563–483 BCE), who challenged the Vedic idea of a permanent self and proposed a path to liberate oneself from suffering. Jainism was founded by Mahavira (599–527 BCE), who emphasized non-violence as well as respect toward all forms of life.

The subsequent classical period started roughly 200 BCE and was characterized by the emergence of the six orthodox schools of Hinduism: Nyāyá, Vaiśeṣika, Sāṃkhya, Yoga, Mīmāṃsā, and Vedanta. The school of Advaita Vedanta developed later in this period. It was systematized by Adi Shankara (c. 700–750 CE), who held that everything is one and that the impression of a universe consisting of many distinct entities is an illusion. A slightly different perspective was defended by Ramanuja (1017–1137 CE), who founded the school of Vishishtadvaita Vedanta and argued that individual entities are real as aspects or parts of the underlying unity. He also helped to popularize the Bhakti movement, which taught devotion toward the divine as a spiritual path and lasted until the 17th to 18th centuries CE. The modern period began roughly 1800 CE and was shaped by encounters with Western thought. Philosophers tried to formulate comprehensive systems to harmonize diverse philosophical and religious teachings. For example, Swami Vivekananda (1863–1902 CE) used the teachings of Advaita Vedanta to argue that all the different religions are valid paths toward the one divine.

Chinese

Main article: Chinese philosophy
Painting of Confucius
The teachings of Confucius on ethics and society shaped subsequent Chinese philosophy.

Chinese philosophy is particularly interested in practical questions associated with right social conduct, government, and self-cultivation. Many schools of thought emerged in the 6th century BCE in competing attempts to resolve the political turbulence of that period. The most prominent among them were Confucianism and Daoism. Confucianism was founded by Confucius (551–479 BCE). It focused on different forms of moral virtues and explored how they lead to harmony in society. Daoism was founded by Laozi (6th century BCE) and examined how humans can live in harmony with nature by following the Dao or the natural order of the universe. Other influential early schools of thought were Mohism, which developed an early form of altruistic consequentialism, and Legalism, which emphasized the importance of a strong state and strict laws.

Buddhism was introduced to China in the 1st century CE and diversified into new forms of Buddhism. Starting in the 3rd century CE, the school of Xuanxue emerged. It interpreted earlier Daoist works with a specific emphasis on metaphysical explanations. Neo-Confucianism developed in the 11th century CE. It systematized previous Confucian teachings and sought a metaphysical foundation of ethics. The modern period in Chinese philosophy began in the early 20th century and was shaped by the influence of and reactions to Western philosophy. The emergence of Chinese Marxism—which focused on class struggle, socialism, and communism—resulted in a significant transformation of the political landscape. Another development was the emergence of New Confucianism, which aims to modernize and rethink Confucian teachings to explore their compatibility with democratic ideals and modern science.

Other traditions

Traditional Japanese philosophy assimilated and synthesized ideas from different traditions, including the indigenous Shinto religion and Chinese and Indian thought in the forms of Confucianism and Buddhism, both of which entered Japan in the 6th and 7th centuries. Its practice is characterized by active interaction with reality rather than disengaged examination. Neo-Confucianism became an influential school of thought in the 16th century and the following Edo period and prompted a greater focus on language and the natural world. The Kyoto School emerged in the 20th century and integrated Eastern spirituality with Western philosophy in its exploration of concepts like absolute nothingness (zettai-mu), place (basho), and the self.

Latin American philosophy in the pre-colonial period was practiced by indigenous civilizations and explored questions concerning the nature of reality and the role of humans. It has similarities to indigenous North American philosophy, which covered themes such as the interconnectedness of all things. Latin American philosophy during the colonial period, starting around 1550, was dominated by religious philosophy in the form of scholasticism. Influential topics in the post-colonial period were positivism, the philosophy of liberation, and the exploration of identity and culture.

Early African philosophy was primarily conducted and transmitted orally. It focused on community, morality, and ancestral ideas, encompassing folklore, wise sayings, religious ideas, and philosophical concepts like Ubuntu. Systematic African philosophy emerged at the beginning of the 20th century. It discusses topics such as ethnophilosophy, négritude, pan-Africanism, Marxism, postcolonialism, the role of cultural identity, relativism, African epistemology, and the critique of Eurocentrism.

Core branches

See also: Outline of philosophy § Branches of philosophy, and Outline of philosophy § Philosophical schools of thought

Philosophical questions can be grouped into several branches. These groupings allow philosophers to focus on a set of similar topics and interact with other thinkers who are interested in the same questions. Epistemology, ethics, logic, and metaphysics are sometimes listed as the main branches. There are many other subfields besides them and the different divisions are neither exhaustive nor mutually exclusive. For example, political philosophy, ethics, and aesthetics are sometimes linked under the general heading of value theory as they investigate normative or evaluative aspects. Furthermore, philosophical inquiry sometimes overlaps with other disciplines in the natural and social sciences, religion, and mathematics.

Epistemology

Main article: Epistemology

Epistemology is the branch of philosophy that studies knowledge. It is also known as theory of knowledge and aims to understand what knowledge is, how it arises, what its limits are, and what value it has. It further examines the nature of truth, belief, justification, and rationality. Some of the questions addressed by epistemologists include "By what method(s) can one acquire knowledge?"; "How is truth established?"; and "Can we prove causal relations?"

Epistemology is primarily interested in declarative knowledge or knowledge of facts, like knowing that Princess Diana died in 1997. But it also investigates practical knowledge, such as knowing how to ride a bicycle, and knowledge by acquaintance, for example, knowing a celebrity personally.

One area in epistemology is the analysis of knowledge. It assumes that declarative knowledge is a combination of different parts and attempts to identify what those parts are. An influential theory in this area claims that knowledge has three components: it is a belief that is justified and true. This theory is controversial and the difficulties associated with it are known as the Gettier problem. Alternative views state that knowledge requires additional components, like the absence of luck; different components, like the manifestation of cognitive virtues instead of justification; or they deny that knowledge can be analyzed in terms of other phenomena.

Another area in epistemology asks how people acquire knowledge. Often-discussed sources of knowledge are perception, introspection, memory, inference, and testimony. According to empiricists, all knowledge is based on some form of experience. Rationalists reject this view and hold that some forms of knowledge, like innate knowledge, are not acquired through experience. The regress problem is a common issue in relation to the sources of knowledge and the justification they offer. It is based on the idea that beliefs require some kind of reason or evidence to be justified. The problem is that the source of justification may itself be in need of another source of justification. This leads to an infinite regress or circular reasoning. Foundationalists avoid this conclusion by arguing that some sources can provide justification without requiring justification themselves. Another solution is presented by coherentists, who state that a belief is justified if it coheres with other beliefs of the person.

Many discussions in epistemology touch on the topic of philosophical skepticism, which raises doubts about some or all claims to knowledge. These doubts are often based on the idea that knowledge requires absolute certainty and that humans are unable to acquire it.

Ethics

Main article: Ethics
Drawing of John Stuart Mill
"The utilitarian doctrine is, that happiness is desirable, and the only thing desirable, as an end; all other things being only desirable as means to that end." — John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism (1863)

Ethics, also known as moral philosophy, studies what constitutes right conduct. It is also concerned with the moral evaluation of character traits and institutions. It explores what the standards of morality are and how to live a good life. Philosophical ethics addresses such basic questions as "Are moral obligations relative?"; "Which has priority: well-being or obligation?"; and "What gives life meaning?"

The main branches of ethics are meta-ethics, normative ethics, and applied ethics. Meta-ethics asks abstract questions about the nature and sources of morality. It analyzes the meaning of ethical concepts, like right action and obligation. It also investigates whether ethical theories can be true in an absolute sense and how to acquire knowledge of them. Normative ethics encompasses general theories of how to distinguish between right and wrong conduct. It helps guide moral decisions by examining what moral obligations and rights people have. Applied ethics studies the consequences of the general theories developed by normative ethics in specific situations, for example, in the workplace or for medical treatments.

Within contemporary normative ethics, consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics are influential schools of thought. Consequentialists judge actions based on their consequences. One such view is utilitarianism, which argues that actions should increase overall happiness while minimizing suffering. Deontologists judge actions based on whether they follow moral duties, such as abstaining from lying or killing. According to them, what matters is that actions are in tune with those duties and not what consequences they have. Virtue theorists judge actions based on how the moral character of the agent is expressed. According to this view, actions should conform to what an ideally virtuous agent would do by manifesting virtues like generosity and honesty.

Logic

Main article: Logic

Logic is the study of correct reasoning. It aims to understand how to distinguish good from bad arguments. It is usually divided into formal and informal logic. Formal logic uses artificial languages with a precise symbolic representation to investigate arguments. In its search for exact criteria, it examines the structure of arguments to determine whether they are correct or incorrect. Informal logic uses non-formal criteria and standards to assess the correctness of arguments. It relies on additional factors such as content and context.

Logic examines a variety of arguments. Deductive arguments are mainly studied by formal logic. An argument is deductively valid if the truth of its premises ensures the truth of its conclusion. Deductively valid arguments follow a rule of inference, like modus ponens, which has the following logical form: "p; if p then q; therefore q". An example is the argument "today is Sunday; if today is Sunday then I don't have to go to work today; therefore I don't have to go to work today".

The premises of non-deductive arguments also support their conclusion, although this support does not guarantee that the conclusion is true. One form is inductive reasoning. It starts from a set of individual cases and uses generalization to arrive at a universal law governing all cases. An example is the inference that "all ravens are black" based on observations of many individual black ravens. Another form is abductive reasoning. It starts from an observation and concludes that the best explanation of this observation must be true. This happens, for example, when a doctor diagnoses a disease based on the observed symptoms.

Logic also investigates incorrect forms of reasoning. They are called fallacies and are divided into formal and informal fallacies based on whether the source of the error lies only in the form of the argument or also in its content and context.

Metaphysics

Main article: Metaphysics
Incunabulum showing the beginning of Aristotle's Metaphysics
The beginning of Aristotle's Metaphysics in an incunabulum decorated with hand-painted miniatures.

Metaphysics is the study of the most general features of reality, such as existence, objects and their properties, wholes and their parts, space and time, events, and causation. There are disagreements about the precise definition of the term and its meaning has changed throughout the ages. Metaphysicians attempt to answer basic questions including "Why is there something rather than nothing?"; "Of what does reality ultimately consist?"; and "Are humans free?"

Metaphysics is sometimes divided into general metaphysics and specific or special metaphysics. General metaphysics investigates being as such. It examines the features that all entities have in common. Specific metaphysics is interested in different kinds of being, the features they have, and how they differ from one another.

An important area in metaphysics is ontology. Some theorists identify it with general metaphysics. Ontology investigates concepts like being, becoming, and reality. It studies the categories of being and asks what exists on the most fundamental level. Another subfield of metaphysics is philosophical cosmology. It is interested in the essence of the world as a whole. It asks questions including whether the universe has a beginning and an end and whether it was created by something else.

A key topic in metaphysics concerns the question of whether reality only consists of physical things like matter and energy. Alternative suggestions are that mental entities (such as souls and experiences) and abstract entities (such as numbers) exist apart from physical things. Another topic in metaphysics concerns the problem of identity. One question is how much an entity can change while still remaining the same entity. According to one view, entities have essential and accidental features. They can change their accidental features but they cease to be the same entity if they lose an essential feature. A central distinction in metaphysics is between particulars and universals. Universals, like the color red, can exist at different locations at the same time. This is not the case for particulars including individual persons or specific objects. Other metaphysical questions are whether the past fully determines the present and what implications this would have for the existence of free will.

Other major branches

See also: List of philosophies

There are many other subfields of philosophy besides its core branches. Some of the most prominent are aesthetics, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, philosophy of religion, philosophy of science, and political philosophy.

Aesthetics in the philosophical sense is the field that studies the nature and appreciation of beauty and other aesthetic properties, like the sublime. Although it is often treated together with the philosophy of art, aesthetics is a broader category that encompasses other aspects of experience, such as natural beauty. In a more general sense, aesthetics is "critical reflection on art, culture, and nature". A key question in aesthetics is whether beauty is an objective feature of entities or a subjective aspect of experience. Aesthetic philosophers also investigate the nature of aesthetic experiences and judgments. Further topics include the essence of works of art and the processes involved in creating them.

The philosophy of language studies the nature and function of language. It examines the concepts of meaning, reference, and truth. It aims to answer questions such as how words are related to things and how language affects human thought and understanding. It is closely related to the disciplines of logic and linguistics. The philosophy of language rose to particular prominence in the early 20th century in analytic philosophy due to the works of Frege and Russell. One of its central topics is to understand how sentences get their meaning. There are two broad theoretical camps: those emphasizing the formal truth conditions of sentences and those investigating circumstances that determine when it is suitable to use a sentence, the latter of which is associated with speech act theory.

The philosophy of mind studies the nature of mental phenomena and how they are related to the physical world. It aims to understand different types of conscious and unconscious mental states, like beliefs, desires, intentions, feelings, sensations, and free will. An influential intuition in the philosophy of mind is that there is a distinction between the inner experience of objects and their existence in the external world. The mind-body problem is the problem of explaining how these two types of thing—mind and matter—are related. The main traditional responses are materialism, which assumes that matter is more fundamental; idealism, which assumes that mind is more fundamental; and dualism, which assumes that mind and matter are distinct types of entities. In contemporary philosophy, another common view is functionalism, which understands mental states in terms of the functional or causal roles they play. The mind-body problem is closely related to the hard problem of consciousness, which asks how the physical brain can produce qualitatively subjective experiences.

The philosophy of religion investigates the basic concepts, assumptions, and arguments associated with religion. It critically reflects on what religion is, how to define the divine, and whether one or more gods exist. It also includes the discussion of worldviews that reject religious doctrines. Further questions addressed by the philosophy of religion are: "How are we to interpret religious language, if not literally?"; "Is divine omniscience compatible with free will?"; and, "Are the great variety of world religions in some way compatible in spite of their apparently contradictory theological claims?" It includes topics from nearly all branches of philosophy. It differs from theology since theological debates typically take place within one religious tradition, whereas debates in the philosophy of religion transcend any particular set of theological assumptions.

The philosophy of science examines the fundamental concepts, assumptions, and problems associated with science. It reflects on what science is and how to distinguish it from pseudoscience. It investigates the methods employed by scientists, how their application can result in knowledge, and on what assumptions they are based. It also studies the purpose and implications of science. Some of its questions are "What counts as an adequate explanation?"; "Is a scientific law anything more than a description of a regularity?"; and "Can some special sciences be explained entirely in the terms of a more general science?" It is a vast field that is commonly divided into the philosophy of the natural sciences and the philosophy of the social sciences, with further subdivisions for each of the individual sciences under these headings. How these branches are related to one another is also a question in the philosophy of science. Many of its philosophical issues overlap with the fields of metaphysics or epistemology.

Political philosophy is the philosophical inquiry into the fundamental principles and ideas governing political systems and societies. It examines the basic concepts, assumptions, and arguments in the field of politics. It investigates the nature and purpose of government and compares its different forms. It further asks under what circumstances the use of political power is legitimate, rather than a form of simple violence. In this regard, it is concerned with the distribution of political power, social and material goods, and legal rights. Other topics are justice, liberty, equality, sovereignty, and nationalism. Political philosophy involves a general inquiry into normative matters and differs in this respect from political science, which aims to provide empirical descriptions of actually existing states. Political philosophy is often treated as a subfield of ethics. Influential schools of thought in political philosophy are liberalism, conservativism, socialism, and anarchism.

Methods

Main article: Philosophical methodology

Methods of philosophy are ways of conducting philosophical inquiry. They include techniques for arriving at philosophical knowledge and justifying philosophical claims as well as principles used for choosing between competing theories. A great variety of methods have been employed throughout the history of philosophy. Many of them differ significantly from the methods used in the natural sciences in that they do not use experimental data obtained through measuring equipment. The choice of one's method usually has important implications both for how philosophical theories are constructed and for the arguments cited for or against them. This choice is often guided by epistemological considerations about what constitutes philosophical evidence.

Methodological disagreements can cause conflicts among philosophical theories or about the answers to philosophical questions. The discovery of new methods has often had important consequences both for how philosophers conduct their research and for what claims they defend. Some philosophers engage in most of their theorizing using one particular method while others employ a wider range of methods based on which one fits the specific problem investigated best.

Conceptual analysis is a common method in analytic philosophy. It aims to clarify the meaning of concepts by analyzing them into their component parts. Another method often employed in analytic philosophy is based on common sense. It starts with commonly accepted beliefs and tries to draw unexpected conclusions from them, which it often employs in a negative sense to criticize philosophical theories that are too far removed from how the average person sees the issue. It is similar to how ordinary language philosophy approaches philosophical questions by investigating how ordinary language is used.

Diagram depicting a trolley that is headed towards a group of people. There is an alternate track with only one person and a switch to change tracks.
The trolley problem is a thought experiment that investigates the moral difference between doing and allowing harm. This issue is explored in an imaginary situation in which a person can sacrifice a single person by redirecting a trolley to save a group of people.

Various methods in philosophy give particular importance to intuitions, that is, non-inferential impressions about the correctness of specific claims or general principles. For example, they play an important role in thought experiments, which employ counterfactual thinking to evaluate the possible consequences of an imagined situation. These anticipated consequences can then be used to confirm or refute philosophical theories. The method of reflective equilibrium also employs intuitions. It seeks to form a coherent position on a certain issue by examining all the relevant beliefs and intuitions, some of which often have to be deemphasized or reformulated to arrive at a coherent perspective.

Pragmatists stress the significance of concrete practical consequences for assessing whether a philosophical theory is true. According to the pragmatic maxim as formulated by Charles Sanders Peirce, the idea a person has of an object is nothing more than the totality of practical consequences they associate with this object. Pragmatists have also used this method to expose disagreements as merely verbal, that is, to show they make no genuine difference on the level of consequences.

Phenomenologists seek knowledge of the realm of appearance and the structure of human experience. They insist upon the first-personal character of all experience and proceed by suspending theoretical judgments about the external world. This technique of phenomenological reduction is known as "bracketing" or epoché. The goal is to give an unbiased description of the appearance of things.

Methodological naturalism places great emphasis on the empirical approach and the resulting theories found in the natural sciences. In this way, it contrasts with methodologies that give more weight to pure reasoning and introspection.

Relation to other fields

Philosophy is closely related to many other fields. It is sometimes understood as a meta-discipline that clarifies their nature and limits. It does this by critically examining their basic concepts, background assumptions, and methods. In this regard, it plays a key role in providing an interdisciplinary perspective. It bridges the gap between different disciplines by analyzing which concepts and problems they have in common. It shows how they overlap while also delimiting their scope. Historically, most of the individual sciences originated from philosophy.

The influence of philosophy is felt in several fields that require difficult practical decisions. In medicine, philosophical considerations related to bioethics affect issues like whether an embryo is already a person and under what conditions abortion is morally permissible. A closely related philosophical problem is how humans should treat other animals, for instance, whether it is acceptable to use non-human animals as food or for research experiments. In relation to business and professional life, philosophy has contributed by providing ethical frameworks. They contain guidelines on which business practices are morally acceptable and cover the issue of corporate social responsibility.

Philosophical inquiry is relevant to many fields that are concerned with what to believe and how to arrive at evidence for one's beliefs. This is a key issue for the sciences, which have as one of their prime objectives the creation of scientific knowledge. Scientific knowledge is based on empirical evidence but it is often not clear whether empirical observations are neutral or already include theoretical assumptions. A closely connected problem is whether the available evidence is sufficient to decide between competing theories. Epistemological problems in relation to the law include what counts as evidence and how much evidence is required to find a person guilty of a crime. A related issue in journalism is how to ensure truth and objectivity when reporting on events.

In the fields of theology and religion, there are many doctrines associated with the existence and nature of God as well as rules governing correct behavior. A key issue is whether a rational person should believe these doctrines, for example, whether revelation in the form of holy books and religious experiences of the divine are sufficient evidence for these beliefs.

Photo of Judith Butler
Judith Butler is one of the philosophers responsible for the cultural influence of philosophy on the feminist movement.

Philosophy in the form of logic has been influential in the fields of mathematics and computer science. Further fields influenced by philosophy include psychology, sociology, linguistics, education, and the arts. The close relation between philosophy and other fields in the contemporary period is reflected in the fact that many philosophy graduates go on to work in related fields rather than in philosophy itself.

In the field of politics, philosophy addresses issues such as how to assess whether a government policy is just. Philosophical ideas have prepared and shaped various political developments. For example, ideals formulated in Enlightenment philosophy laid the foundation for constitutional democracy and played a role in the American Revolution and the French Revolution. Marxist philosophy and its exposition of communism was one of the factors in the Russian Revolution and the Chinese Communist Revolution. In India, Mahatma Gandhi's philosophy of non-violence shaped the Indian independence movement.

An example of the cultural and critical role of philosophy is found in its influence on the feminist movement through philosophers such as Mary Wollstonecraft, Simone de Beauvoir, and Judith Butler. It has shaped the understanding of key concepts in feminism, for instance, the meaning of gender, how it differs from biological sex, and what role it plays in the formation of personal identity. Philosophers have also investigated the concepts of justice and equality and their implications with respect to the prejudicial treatment of women in male-dominated societies.

The idea that philosophy is useful for many aspects of life and society is sometimes rejected. According to one such view, philosophy is mainly undertaken for its own sake and does not make significant contributions to existing practices or external goals.

See also

Main article: Outline of philosophy

References

Notes

  1. The Ancient Greek philosophos ('philosopher') was itself possibly borrowed from the Ancient Egyptian term mer-rekh (mr-rḫ) meaning 'lover of wisdom'.
  2. The exact periodization is disputed with some sources suggesting it started as early as 500 BCE, while others argue it began as late as 200 CE.
  3. These dates are traditionally cited but some recent scholars suggest that his life ran from 1077 to 1157.
  4. The truth conditions of a sentence are the circumstances or states of affairs under which the sentence would be true.

Citations

  1. Perry, Bratman & Fischer 2010, p. 4.
  2. Plato 2023, Apology.
  3. McCutcheon 2014, p. 26.
  4. Overgaard, Gilbert & Burwood 2013, pp. vii, 17.
  5. Overgaard, Gilbert & Burwood 2013, pp. 20–22, What Is Philosophy?.
  6. Regenbogen 2010, Philosophiebegriffe.
  7. Smith, § 2.b.
  8. Grimm & Cohoe 2021, pp. 236–237.
  9. Sharpe & Ure 2021, pp. 76, 80.
  10. Shields 2022, Lead Section.
  11. Grayling 2019, Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century.
  12. Grayling 2019, Philosophy in the Twentieth Century.
  13. Waithe 1995, pp. xix–xxiii.
  14. ^
  15. Ranganathan, 1. Rāmānuja's Life and Works.
  16. Ranganathan, Lead Section, 2c. Substantive Theses.
  17. ^
    • Littlejohn 2023, 4b. Neo-Confucianism: The Original Way of Confucius for a New Era
    • EB Staff 2017, § Periods of Development of Chinese Philosophy
    • Davis 2022, Lead Section, § 3. Absolute Nothingness: Giving Philosophical Form to the Formless
    • Kasulis 2022, § 4.4.2 Modern Academic Philosophies
  18. Schroeder 2021, Lead Section: "In its broadest sense, 'value theory' is a catch-all label used to encompass all branches of moral philosophy, social and political philosophy, aesthetics, and sometimes feminist philosophy and the philosophy of religion – whatever areas of philosophy are deemed to encompass some 'evaluative' aspect.".
  19. Mulvaney 2009, p. ix.
  20. Olsson 2021, Lead Section, § 1. Coherentism Versus Foundationalism.
  21. Mill 1863, p. 51.
  22. Mulvaney 2009, pp. vii–xi.
    • Dittmer, 1. Applied Ethics as Distinct from Normative Ethics and Metaethics
    • Nagel 2006, pp. 382, 386–388
  23. van Inwagen, Sullivan & Bernstein 2023, Lead Section.
  24. Mulvaney 2009, pp. ix–x.
  25. Audi 2006, § Metaphysics.
  26. Birner 2012, p. 33.
  27. Taliaferro 2023, § 1.
  28. Taliaferro 2023, § 5.1.1.
  29. Taliaferro 2023, § 6.
  30. Newton-Smith 2000, pp. 7.
  31. Newton-Smith 2000, pp. 5.
  32. Papineau 2005, pp. 855–856.
  33. Wolff 2006, pp. 1–2.
  34. Molefe & Allsobrook 2021, pp. 8–9.
  35. Audi 2006, § Subfields of Ethics.
  36. ^ Audi 2006, pp. 332–337.
  37. Lippert-Rasmussen 2017, pp. 51–53.
  38. Cropper 1997.
  39. Bristow 2023, Lead Section, § 2.1 Political Theory.

Bibliography

External links

Library resources about
Philosophy
Philosophy
Branches
Branches
Aesthetics
Epistemology
Ethics
Free will
Metaphysics
Mind
Normativity
Ontology
Reality
By era
By era
Ancient
Chinese
Greco-Roman
Indian
Persian
Medieval
East Asian
European
Indian
Islamic
Jewish
Modern
People
Contemporary
Analytic
Continental
Miscellaneous
  • By region
By region
African
Eastern
Middle Eastern
Western
Miscellaneous
Humanities
Disciplines
Interdisciplinary fields
Themes
Journals
Academia
Related
Philosophy at Misplaced Pages's sister projects: Categories: