Misplaced Pages

:Requests for mediation: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:04, 12 March 2006 editVanished user 19794758563875 (talk | contribs)17,339 edits Other steps in [] that have been attempted:← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:35, 12 November 2018 edit undoRGloucester (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers38,757 edits rdr to mainTag: New redirect 
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
<center>
{|width="85%" style="float:center; text-align:center; padding: 5px; border: 2px solid #696969; background-color: #98fb98;"
|-
|]
|<center>'''''The ] is currently backlogged with requests,</br>due to a shortage of ] and an increased number of requests.'''''</br>New requests will be accepted and assigned as mediators become available.</br>Parties should be aware that there may be a significant delay in having a mediator assigned.</br>Individuals interested in joining the committee should see the ].'''''</center>
|}</center>

{{/Rfm-header}} <!-- Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Rfm-header -->

= New Requests =
New requests should be listed at the top of this section, right below this message. All requests must use the {{tl|RFMR}} template. ] provides an explaination for how to file a request; ] shows the template with instructions. '''All parties to the mediation must indicate agreement to mediate by signing the "Parties' agreement to mediate" section; any request that has not been signed by all parties within 7 days will be rejected.''' A description of common reasons for rejecting requests is available at ].

'''Important note: Any request that fails to include all the information required by the {{tl|RFMR}} format will be delisted immediately. Any request that includes additional information, particularly commentary, will have the additional information removed. ''Parties should adhere to the format strictly.'''''
<!-- New requests immediately below this line. -->


== ] ==
<!-- Title for case: insert the name of the article between the == == above, and affix 2, 3, etc. if there are previous mediations by the same name. -->
===Involved parties===
*{{user|Marcosantezana}}
*{{user|KimvdLinde}}

<!-- Add a bullet and the {{user|Username}} template for each party to the mediation. Parties are defined as individuals who should be included in the mediation discussions; it is not necessary to list every user who has edited the article, but it is essential to include all editors involved in the matter that is being mediated. -->
'''Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:'''
<!-- Provide diffs showing where {{tl|RFMF}} was added to the talk page(s) of the involved article(s), and {{tl|RFM-Request}} was placed on the talk pages of the other parties. -->

:'''Article talk pages:'''
:*]:

:'''User talk pages:'''
:*]:
:*]:
===Other steps in ] that have been attempted:===
*]
*Extended discussions at the talk page, with repeated request to join the discussions to find consensus.
*Limited 'discussion' at user talk pages.
*] under ''Advise needed''.
<!-- If an RfC was filed, provide a link. If the issue was raised on the Administrators Noticeboard or other similar page, provide a stable link (one that links to a revision in the history that contains the full text of the discussion). If informal dispute resolution, such as ], were attempted, provide links. Do not provide links to discussions on the article's talk page(s), or to discussions on user talk pages. -->

===Issues to be mediated===
*General outline of the article.
<!-- Please briefly statet the issues to be mediated as bullet points. Only state issues to be addressed (Should ] contain a link to www.foo.com?); do not comment on user conduct (User:Example has been edit warring on ], inserting links to www.foo.com). This is not the place to explain the entire history of the dispute; each party will have the opportunity to make a full statement once the mediation is accepted. If you do not state the issues to be addresssed, the mediation will not be accepted; discussion of user conduct will be removed by a member of the Mediation Committee. Excessive or spurrious commentary will also be removed. (Note: Only committee members may remove text from this page; editing or otherwise altering any content on this page is vandalism.) -->

===Additional issues to be mediated===
*None

<!-- This section is for the other party to add any issues that are not included above. User bullet points to add additional issues. This is not a response to the issues set out above, nor is it an opportunity to make a statment of the party's opinion, describe another user's actions, or state the history of the dispute. Only issues are to be added; as above, commentary on persons, rather than issues, will be removed by a member of the Mediation Committee. Excessive or spurrious commentary will also be removed. (Once again, only committee members may remove text from the RfM page.) -->

<!-- Each party should provide the issues to be mediated in a separate section; if there are three parties, then there should be three "issue" sections. Editing of another party's section is not allowed. If any party does not agree to mediate, it is not necessary to fill out these sections; simply indicate "Do not agree" and sign in the section below. If any party refuses to mediate, then the mediation will be automatically rejected.-->

===Parties' agreement to mediate===
:''All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.''
<!-- Only signatures should go here, along with either the word "agree" or "disagree." Any additional comments will be removed by a member of the Mediation Committee. -->
*Agree. ] 08:01, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
*Agree. <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>
*Do not agree. <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>

===Decision of the Mediation Committee===
*'''Accept/Reject/Extend''': <!--Reason for rejection (if rejected), additional required information (if extended.) -->
::''For the Mediation Committee,'' <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> <!-- (Mediation Committee members only.) -->
<!-- This section should be inserted, but left blank; when the committee decides whether to accept or reject the mediation, the decision will be posted here. If the request is rejected, reasons for rejection will be included here. If it is accepted, it will be moved to a subpage of Requests for Mediation. If the decision is extended pending further information, the information required will be listed here. -->


== ] and ] ==

===Involved Parties===
*{{user|Ehheh}}
*{{user|Atari2600tim}}
*{{user|jlambert}}
*] 22:06, 11 March 2006 (UTC), acting on behalf of {{user|Young_Zaphod}}

Comment: I've blocked 68. for incivility; see the talk page. 68. appears to have filed this somewhat incompetently on the other users talk pages. And it seems likely that 68. is a sock of YZ. However, it is certainly true that NiMUD and OC could use someone prepared to talk things through with the various parties ] 23:15, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Please see ] and ]. Checkuser showed that Eggster in those cases and Young Zaphod here are probably the same person. I'd still be in favor of giving mediation a go, though. (Please feel free to move my comment if/when the proper request template is used) ] 00:03, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

User who made the request can't be bothered with reading any of the WP policies, let alone following them. He didn't even make this request correctly. Much of his activity is described at ] and ]. He didn't bother with discussing any of his edits with the mediation cabal when it came up, and even accused the volunteer of being somebody's sock puppet (see ]; I looked at his contributions, and the volunteer has many legit edits, and has made no edits regarding the subject at hand, and appears to not be anybody's sock puppet as far as I could tell). Basically, he has a history of making complaints to admin without following any of the associated procedures, and just wastes peoples' time in general. I agree with William and think that the two articles are pretty low quality, and that they won't get any better while Young_Zaphod/Eggster is editing them, however, I don't think that he's ready to cooperate with mediation, should he ever make his request correctly. So, I don't want to waste the time of mediators right now, but if he shows signs of changing his ways (and thus showing signs that he'd sincerely go along with mediation), then I'll agree to be involved with a mediation after he's cooled off and everything to the point where he won't be wasting the time of outsiders. ] (] • ]) 01:33, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==

===Involved parties===
*{{user|Zero0000}}
*{{user| Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg}}
*{{user| Ynhockey}}
*{{user| Zeq}}
*{{user| Babajobu}}
*{{user| Pecher}}
*{{user| Heptor}}


'''Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:'''

<!-- Provide diffs showing where {{tl|RFMF}} was added to the talk page(s) of the involved article(s), and {{tl|RFM-Request}} was placed on the talk pages of the other parties. -->

:'''Article talk pages:'''
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AMachsom_Watch&diff=42934024&oldid=42923140

:'''User talk pages:'''


===Other steps in ] that have been attempted:===
Discussions on article talk page and requestes on user talk page.

===Issues to be mediated===

*NPOV policy 1: Should the article 1st paragrpah contain both POVs on the issue of Human Rights (as it has to do with Checkpoints and the broader issues of human rights to both Palestinians and Israelis) ?
*NPOV policy 2: Should the contraversy be Described ?
*NPOV policy 3: Are quotes from the oragnization own web site should be a source for Misplaced Pages article ?

===Additional issues to be mediated===

*To be completed

===Parties' agreement to mediate===
:''All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.''
<!-- Only signatures should go here, along with either the word "agree" or "disagree." Any additional comments will be removed by a member of the Mediation Committee. -->
*Agree. <nowiki>] 07:36, 9 March 2006 (UTC)</nowiki>
*Agree -] | ] 07:48, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
*Agree. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:18, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
*Agree. -- <font face="wingdings">Y</font> ] <sup>(])</sup> <font face="wingdings">Y</font> 17:37, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
*<s>Sorry, not interested in participating. I once restored some information Zero removed, but it seems that it is back into the article now, even with better wording. As long as he agrees not to remove information again, I'll skip this one. --] ] 23:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)</s> I read the discussion and reconsidered. I '''agree''' to participate in mediation (To make it clear: I was originally not interested in the article alltogether, not just the mediation part. After reading the talk page, I now think it is worth while anyway) --] ] 23:24, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

===Decision of the Mediation Committee===

*Note: As with the above mediation, the previous state of the issues section was unacceptable. Issues must be presented in a bulleted list, without commentary or accusations. The section must be completed in the correct format or the request will be rejected. <font color=#696969>] <sup>] • ]</sup></font> 11:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==
<!-- Title for case: insert the name of the article between the == == above, and affix 2, 3, etc. if there are previous mediations by the same name. -->
===Involved parties===
*{{user|Zero0000}}
*banned user {{user|Alberuni}} who helped zero using anon IP 68.214.35.104
*{{user| Zeq}}

User Ramallite was involved but not directly since he was actually a fair 3rd party that asked questions about my edits and received answers after which he did not change the article. I assume that if he still have doubts about accuracy we will hear from him.

:'''Article talk pages:'''
:*http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AAl-Sarafand&diff=42952415&oldid=42788702

:'''User talk pages:'''
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3AZero0000&diff=42934322&oldid=42934214

===Other steps in ] that have been attempted:===

The issue is small and simple.
So the steps taken are:
*Review by 3rd party (who asked very good questions about the sources provided)
*Requests (to Zero) that he:
:*Avoid reverts and edit wars
:*Discuss each of his reverts in talk page of article. (<b> this is realy a cardinal request, as zero ignore talk too often when he reverts </b>)
:*Do not remove relavant sourced content based on judicial process
:*Adheer to NPOV policy

===Issues to be mediated===

*Should the article contain both version about the issue i.e Only the one from the Islamic movment prepective or also to add the fact from the judicial comitee who investigated the issue.

===Additional issues to be mediated===
*Additional issue 1
*Additional issue 2
<!-- This section is for the other party to add any issues that are not included above. User bullet points to add additional issues. This is not a response to the issues set out above, nor is it an opportunity to make a statment of the party's opinion, describe another user's actions, or state the history of the dispute. Only issues are to be added; as above, commentary on persons, rather than issues, will be removed by a member of the Mediation Committee. Excessive or spurrious commentary will also be removed. (Once again, only committee members may remove text from the RfM page.) -->

<!-- Each party should provide the issues to be mediated in a separate section; if there are three parties, then there should be three "issue" sections. Editing of another party's section is not allowed. If any party does not agree to mediate, it is not necessary to fill out these sections; simply indicate "Do not agree" and sign in the section below. If any party refuses to mediate, then the mediation will be automatically rejected.-->

===Parties' agreement to mediate===
:''All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.''
<!-- Only signatures should go here, along with either the word "agree" or "disagree." Any additional comments will be removed by a member of the Mediation Committee. -->
*Agree. <nowiki>] 07:35, 9 March 2006 (UTC)</nowiki>

===Decision of the Mediation Committee===

*Note: The previous state of the issues section was unacceptable. Issues must be presented in a bulleted list, without commentary or accusations. The section must be completed in the correct format or the request will be rejected. <font color=#696969>] <sup>] • ]</sup></font> 11:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Do not edit below this line. -->

==Archives==
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Archives}}

]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 19:35, 12 November 2018

Redirect to:

Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation: Difference between revisions Add topic