| Revision as of 17:07, 12 March 2006 editTomstoner (talk | contribs)252 edits removing ad hominems← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:37, 17 February 2008 edit undoKaiba (talk | contribs)12,047 edits indefblocked redirect | ||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| ==Welcome== | |||
| Hello, '''{{PAGENAME}}''', and ] to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for ]. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the ''']''', where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type '''<code>{{helpme}}</code>''' on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the ], add a question to the ] or ask me on <!-- ] (broken) --> my talk page. Again, welcome! --]|] 02:42, 9 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks Deepak. I wish the even-handedness and dedication to NPOV of the editors on the Indian Cities Project page, where I believe we met, was shared univerally! --] 17:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == "Vandalism" == | |||
| Be careful throwing the word Vandalism around as you did ; we have a pretty ] of it that I don't think applied in this case. (])<sup>(])</sup> 16:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| More precisely I would "borders on vandalism" -- a description I have seen used by others before in describing similar skewing of the page. The discussion page gives a fuller explanation of the reason for the revert. --] 17:41, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ESkog is giving you good advice; you would be well-advised to pay attention. "Vandalism" has a particular meaning on Misplaced Pages and if you accuse others of it when it does not apply the consequences may be serious. I in fact had just been looking at exactly that edit and wondering whether you should be reported for using a bogus edit summary: removing content that you did not agree with and masking it by saying you were "removing vandalism". I'd advise you to read ] and let that be your guide as to when something is "vandalism". -- ] 00:51, 11 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Jeez Louise, I said the comment was incorrect. This was a proper edit and I explained it in the Naked Shortselling Talk page. Note my response and further comments.--] 14:20, 11 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I've looked over the contributions by ] and found some very mild incivility, but no personal attacks. <br/>]]<span class="plainlinks"></span> 00:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| OK, well his last comments were toned down, so hopefully we can proceed civilly here. --] 16:02, 12 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:37, 17 February 2008
Redirect to: