Misplaced Pages

User talk:JonBroxton: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:06, 20 June 2011 editWalter Görlitz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers294,571 edits new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:06, 5 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,299,654 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:JonBroxton/Archive 6) (bot 
(368 intermediate revisions by 83 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 5 |counter = 6
|algo = old(21d) |algo = old(21d)
|archive = User talk:JonBroxton/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:JonBroxton/Archive %(counter)d
Line 8: Line 8:
== Julian Valentin & Kyle Patterson == == Julian Valentin & Kyle Patterson ==


Sorry. The source is here 'http://thelagalaxy.blogspot.com/2009/11/stefani-miglioranzi-selected-in.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter'. Same press release that confirms Miglioranzi taken in Expansion Draft. Sorry. The source is here 'http://thelagalaxy.blogspot.com/2009/11/stefani-miglioranzi-selected-in.html Same press release that confirms Miglioranzi taken in Expansion Draft.


== Tudela == == Tudela ==
Line 33: Line 33:
you didn't even leave a reason why your undid my factually correct edit that has precedent on wikipedia. i would like to know your reasoning. you didn't even leave a reason why your undid my factually correct edit that has precedent on wikipedia. i would like to know your reasoning.


== Antigua Barracuda FC players == == New Page Patrol survey ==


{| style="background-color: #dfeff3; border: 4px solid #bddff2; width:100%" cellpadding="5"
I don't believe this, the Barracuda players have made appearances for the club and a lot of pages still had to be created. I've started a few pages but now I'm worn out, can you take care of a few others and also add some missing info that I can't find? – ] (]) 04:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
| ]
:Well I've created a couple more pages so we still have about 9 pages that need to be created. – ] (]) 04:04, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
<big>'''New page patrol – ''Survey Invitation'''''</big>
----
Hello {{PAGENAME}}! The ] is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
*If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
*If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
'''Please click to take part.'''<br>
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
----
<small>You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see ]</small>
|}


== Columbus Shooting Stars ==
== Orphaned non-free image File:Washingtoncrossfire.jpg ==


== Request move for Lancaster Inferno Page ==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


== Requested move ==
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> –] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 23:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
{{error|] is not for moves from user space; see ] (use &#123;&#123;]:]&#125;&#125; instead), or ]}}
== ] files in your user space ==
----info.lancaster.inferno
== Discussion RE the US Soccer Leagues ==


I'm letting you know that there has been a discussion regarding the US Pyramid: ]. I probably stepped in it by adding ASL without researching that league at all; however, the broader discussion of how to order the leagues that are not sanctioned by USSF is also being included. Would love to hear input from frequent editors of the lower division league and club pages. Thx
] Hey there JonBroxton, thank you for your contributions. I am a ], alerting you that ] files are ]. I some files I found on ]. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your ] or your ].
== ] ==


Hi. We're into the last five days of the ]. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
* See a log of files removed today ].
<!-- Message sent by User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=WiR_list_2&oldid=812113507 -->
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
* Shut off the bot ].
<blockquote>'''Subject does not appear to meet the ] criteria.'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
* Report errors ].


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
Thank you, -- ] (]) 05:04, 3 June 2011 (UTC)


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 02:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
== Josh Wolff ==
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
Hey there. Last week, ] edited ] to correct a mistake in the international goals table. You reverted this accurate edit on the grounds that it was unsourced. Unfortunately, your edit, also unsourced, reintroduced the mistake to Misplaced Pages. I found a source online, referenced it in the article, and corrected the error.
<blockquote>'''Subject does not appear to meet the ] criteria.'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
Your user page and history indicate that you contribute a great deal to Misplaced Pages, contributions that allow us mere browsers to enjoy a valuable source of information. On the other side, there are users like me, who occasionally ] to articles when they identify errors. In doing so, they may not adhere to the conventions observed by more experienced editors, such as failing to provide a citation. Most of these edits are in ] and make important contributions to Misplaced Pages (e.g., by correcting a hard-to-spot mistake). If the edit is not sourced to your satisfaction, and the material being changed is likewise not sourced, might I suggest attempting to verify the correct facts instead of blindly reverting the edit? This would improve the accuracy of Misplaced Pages while demonstrating more respect for the contributor.


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
--] (]) 18:38, 3 June 2011 (UTC)


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 02:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
== RGV Ocelots FC Revision ==
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
This user is not an employee of the franchise, and as such, there is no conflict of interest. The information has been researched extensively as opposed to the information that you have previously posted. I would like to clarify that RGV Coyotes SC has more to do with the current Ocelots FC franchise than RGV Bravos does on many different levels.
<blockquote>'''Subject does not appear to have the needed coverage to meet the ].'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
History
The details surrounding the formation of the team are an integral part of the franchise's creation. Those details include the state of soccer in the region at the time (the loss of the Pan Am men's soccer program at the time, etc.). It is a well documented fact (more sources to come) that the current owner of the Ocelots also owned the Coyotes. It is also a well documented fact that none of the teams from the region had players from across the region. It would be irresponsible to say that there was no soccer in the Valley and that no one could possibly have the brain power to attempt to achieve anything beyond local amateur soccer. The historical section sheds light on the fact that there was soccer life before the USL came to town--and that was attributed in part by the Coyotes' activities over the course of six years. The Bravos did the rest on their own four years later (There is nothing in the post that disputes that.)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
1.) Only someone from the region would know the state of soccer in his home region to know what to research.


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 02:59, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
The history posted on the Official website has been quoted verbatim and substatiated and verified with the proper citations. This should have addressed any COI and bias issues. The research yielded the following information:
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
1.) The Coyotes were in fact, the first franchise to actively seek participation and even helped try to promote the then USISL in the Rio Grande Valley market in an effort to stimulate interest in a future franchise and interest in the League itself. NOTE: The climate of the day in the soccer community was that the only leagues that mattered were everywhere else but the United States. Imagine trying to sell an American brand (USISL/USL) to people that have grown up watching the Mexican First Division Soccer--especially on the Border? That climate remains today regardless of American league presence in the Valley. Valley soccer fans are finicky and discriminatory because they are used to seeing a high caliber of soccer.


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 19:52, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
2.) The Coyotes were owned and coached by current Ocelots FC owner Kru Kayan Sitsanthaparn.
== ] of ] ==
3.) The Coyotes actually played against USISL/USL teams during their existence from 1998-2004.
]
4.) The Coyotes colors were orange, white, silver, and black.


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
All of the facts point to an evolution, and a lucky break in the form of a failing Bravos franchise, for the current owner to take the reins of the Bravos franchise, and jump back into the sport.
<blockquote>'''Subject does not appear to meet the ].'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
However, to state that the Ocelots were originally founded as the Bravos is a complete falsehood because of the following (make sure to read the Ocelots FC citations!):


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
1.) The USL would not allow the owner to keep team name, logos, franchise marks (see source).
2.) The fact that the owner purchased a franchise with the SPSL does not leave any room for the "same" franchise to legally continue on. Therefore, RGV Bravos FC "died." The Ocelots FC franchise was new as were the mascot and logo (see source). The owner, deciding to bring back the former project, adopted the former Coyotes colors in homage and as a reminder of the hard work done in the past (see source). All of the aforementioned is now privately owned as opposed to the Bravos name, etc. which was owned by the League.
3.) The current franchise did not continue in the same League and change names--although it was already being contemplated (see source). Had Ocelots FC continued in the PDL and made the change from Bravos to Ocelots, then it could safely be stated that the Ocelots were founded as the Bravos, but that isn't the case.


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 21:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
However, in terms of "facts" your lack of research on this subject matter leaves much to be desired. For example:
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
1.) Your previous information still listed Juan de Dios Garcia as the Head Coach of this team when it was announced in February that Juan Macias.
<blockquote>'''I'm not finding the coverage of this topic needed for ] to be met here.'''</blockquote>
2.) You posted a questionable reason for the discontinuation of the franchise with the PDL by citing rgvfutbol.com as a credible source of information. The rgvfutbol.com website is owned and operated by Ed Chrnko Salas, a former employee of the Bravos franchise and former colleague of RGV Grandes FC owner, Ignacio Larraga. The mere fact that he would write such a negative story against his former team given the circumstances of his departure, constitutes a conflict of interest that would undoubtedly yield biased information.


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
FYI: Prior to his involvement with Bravos FC, Ed Chrnko Salas wrote the stories that are cited in the RGV Ocelots FC reference list when he was a journalist for La Frontera covering the RGV Coyotes SC.


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
3.) Who is your source that prompted you to state that Sitsanthaparn was an interim owner? My sources bring conflicting information.


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 02:06, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
All in all, the RGV Bravos FC should have its own page as a defunct franchise as the Ocelots are not a continuation. All of those matters have nothing to do with Ocelots FC. The only note that the RGV Bravos FC should have with regard to this topic is that it brought the owner back into the sport after he had left it behind in 2004 and/or that he personally congratulated the Bravos FC staff (source pending).
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
Again, this is not bias. These are facts that have been posted for people to learn about soccer in our region and the history of Ocelots FC. Please be sure to check your sources before posting. I have seen Laredo Heat's wikipedia page, and they dont have a SINGLE citation--while practically EVERY sentence in my posting is cited with a source to verify. It's irresponsible to say that I'm being biased when the statements are quoted straight from the Official Website and there are citations for all of them.
<blockquote>'''Unable to find any sourcing suggesting notability for this team under the ].'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
Thanks for your prompt response. Neither do I have a relationship with this team--although I do live in the Valley region. The Ocelots are getting some good results and gaining a decent following, so naturally, given the research that I've done, it should be known that the current franchise (like so many others across the country) has a rich history behind it that should be preserved for posterity.


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 22:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Ocelots FC should be a separate page since it is a completely new entity. The Bravos page should be kept separately as RGV Bravos FC. If I'm not mistaken, it's already split into two, and I've left one of them alone. The best bet is to keep one page as it is and the newer page to remain as RGV Ocelots FC.
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
My apologies for any misunderstandings and thanks again for your cooperation ] (]) 05:13, 4 June 2011 (UTC).
<blockquote>'''Subject does not appear to meet the ].'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 01:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your cooperation. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:52, 4 June 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
== DCU task force ==
<blockquote>'''Subject does not appear to meet the ].'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
Hey Jon, I have replied to your post and Patrick Niel's post re: the D.C. United task force. Here's the ] ] (]) 17:48, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
== Cosmos U-23 ==


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 01:20, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Sorry bru, I messed up ]. Hope there's no hard feelings, I've now tidied it up and so on. You have to find sources for the players, though, because what you've got doesn't say anything about these guys playing for Cosmos U-23. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – ]<sup>]</sup></span> 07:21, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
==Δ==
<blockquote>'''Subject does not appear to meet the ].'''</blockquote>
To answer , no. I don't think he can. At least I've never seen him do it. --] (]) 19:06, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 01:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''No indication of notability'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ]<sup>]</sup> 17:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 03:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:06, 5 January 2025

Julian Valentin & Kyle Patterson

Sorry. The source is here 'http://thelagalaxy.blogspot.com/2009/11/stefani-miglioranzi-selected-in.html Same press release that confirms Miglioranzi taken in Expansion Draft.

Tudela

Tudela is on trial at Steaua. Read this official source... http://www.steauafc.com/ro/articole/tudela_antrenament_13ianuarie2009/ If used after cantonment in Turkey and Tudela confirms its value, will signed on 3 years with Steaua. Sorry for my bad English.

Appearance info

I'm getting them from the match report, provided by the home team. http://charlestonbattery.com/matches_report.asp?mid=317

christfollower2486

CHS Battery page check

Would you mind taking a look over a page I just created? Its the 2010 Charleston Battery season - and it's my first real page creation. Thanks! christfollower2486 (talk)

File:Oldgalaxylogo.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oldgalaxylogo.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

reverting andy najar edit

you didn't even leave a reason why your undid my factually correct edit that has precedent on wikipedia. i would like to know your reasoning.

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello JonBroxton! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Columbus Shooting Stars

Request move for Lancaster Inferno Page

Requested move

Template:Requested move is not for moves from user space; see Misplaced Pages:Articles for creation (use {{subst:submit}} instead), or move it yourself


info.lancaster.inferno

Discussion RE the US Soccer Leagues

I'm letting you know that there has been a discussion regarding the US Pyramid: Talk:United States soccer league system#ASL's place in the pyramid. I probably stepped in it by adding ASL without researching that league at all; however, the broader discussion of how to order the leagues that are not sanctioned by USSF is also being included. Would love to hear input from frequent editors of the lower division league and club pages. Thx

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Proposed deletion of All-time Wilmington Hammerheads FC roster

Notice

The article All-time Wilmington Hammerheads FC roster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:LISTN criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 02:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of All-time Charleston Battery roster

Notice

The article All-time Charleston Battery roster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:LISTN criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 02:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of All-time Atlanta Silverbacks roster

Notice

The article All-time Atlanta Silverbacks roster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not appear to have the needed coverage to meet the WP:LISTN.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 02:59, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of All-time Atlanta Silverbacks roster for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All-time Atlanta Silverbacks roster is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/All-time Atlanta Silverbacks roster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 19:52, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of All-time North Carolina FC roster

Notice

The article All-time North Carolina FC roster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:NLIST.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 21:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of All-time Toronto Lynx roster

Notice

The article All-time Toronto Lynx roster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm not finding the coverage of this topic needed for WP:LISTN to be met here.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 02:06, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tennessee Lady Blues

Notice

The article Tennessee Lady Blues has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find any sourcing suggesting notability for this team under the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 22:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Northern Kentucky TC Stars

Notice

The article Northern Kentucky TC Stars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 01:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Miami Revolution

Notice

The article Miami Revolution has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 01:20, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Calgary Wildfire

Notice

The article Calgary Wildfire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 01:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Northern Kentucky TC Stars

Notice

The article Northern Kentucky TC Stars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 17:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of All-time Charleston Battery roster for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All-time Charleston Battery roster is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/All-time Charleston Battery roster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 03:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)