| Revision as of 23:24, 2 July 2011 editWill Beback (talk | contribs)112,162 edits →Deletion review for Lewinsky (neologism): cmt← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 02:09, 26 May 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB |
| (232 intermediate revisions by 54 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
⚫ |
<div style="position:absolute; z-index:100; right:20px; top:10px;" class="metadata" id="administrator">]</div> |
|
{{busy}} |
|
| ⚫ |
<div style="position:absolute; z-index:100; right:20px; top:10px;" class="metadata" id="administrator">{{click|link=Misplaced Pages:Administrators|image=Admin_mop.PNG|width=20px|height=60px|title=This user is an administrator.}}</div> |
|
|
{{User talk:Dreadstar/Talk}} |
|
{{User talk:Dreadstar/Talk}} |
|
|
|
|
| Line 6: |
Line 5: |
|
Thanks! ] <small>]</small> |
|
Thanks! ] <small>]</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Deletion == |
|
==] GA nom== |
|
|
OK, I've listed this for GA. It's the only one in it's category. Any help would be appreciated. We should look at its current state with GA-level in mind. I don't have any experience to speak of at this level, so help would be great. I think we need to expand the lead. You expressed previous interest in this so I'm letting you know. ] ] 20:06, 24 November 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:the DYK had , holy cow! We made the DYK stats page! ] ] 14:19, 25 November 2011 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
::Awesome! I'll try to put in a little work on the article when I recover! If I recover, that is! :) ] <small>]</small> 21:00, 29 November 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::You OK? Or was it just the wiki-stress? (Check out my talk page, the new thermometer has done wonders for my sanity! LOL!) ]<sup>]</sup> 23:21, 30 November 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Hey, thanks for asking! I'm doing much better now, had some pretty stressful personal issues going on that I unfortunately allowed to spill over into my contributions on Misplaced Pages; said some things on here that I shouldn't have, but hopefully nothing that will carry further now that I've paid the price for it. The thermometer may be a good idea! I'm considering if I should redesign my user pages, prolly need something to indicate a fresh, new outlook. Then again, it's really just being more of my old self; patient, calm and kind... :) I'm still in recovery mode, considering my next steps here and in RL, so, I dunno. Thanks for being there...I appreciate the support...and, I have to admit, ] <small>]</small> 01:28, 2 December 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Ah, RL. Yes, doggone that darn place! It can be SUCH an interference with wiki-life! What is up with that?? (smile). I can correlate my highest WP edit count ever with two very lousy months of my RL a few years back. There is a new/old user here, ThatPeskyCommoner, who has been a wonderful addition to WPEQ and many other areas, I think she's faced some recent RL changes that brought her here, and may have some good wisdom for all of us in the integration of WP and RL. I get a kick out of her! ]<sup>]</sup> 20:18, 2 December 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Page protection == |
|
Which speedy deletion reason was the basis for your deletion of ]? Your deletion comment was ''WP:BLP concerns ""Bill Clinton" rather than Lewinsky"'', but I'm not sure if you're claiming it violated G10. It looks like a well-sourced and neutral article, so I don't think G10 would apply. I suggest you restore it and go through a regular AFD. <b>] ] </b> 22:38, 2 July 2011 (UTC) |
|
| ⚫ |
:It's clearly a BLP violation; and I will not be restoring it. ] <small>]</small> 22:41, 2 July 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::I also see you blocked the editor who created it. ]. It may well be that they are a sock or have committed other blockable offenses, but I don't see how writing that article qualifies, especially since there was no warning. Who do you think is the sock master? <b>] ] </b> 22:43, 2 July 2011 (UTC) |
|
| ⚫ |
:::Again, read ]. ] <small>]</small> 22:46, 2 July 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
*Lurkers may also want to review . ] <small>]</small> 22:47, 2 July 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
*Non perm extension: . ] <small>]</small> 22:50, 2 July 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:Not really relevant. <b>] ] </b> 22:51, 2 July 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::I think it it. It's called 'retaliation'. ] <small>]</small> 22:53, 2 July 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I noticed that you were the person who protected the ] article a month ago due to spamming, and I was wondering if you could protect it again, because the spammer appears to have returned. ] has also been repeatedly spammed by this individual, so you may want to protect that as well. Have a good one. --] (]) 17:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC) |
|
==Deletion review for ]== |
|
|
⚫ |
:They look pretty stable at the moment, but I'll put them on my watchlist and try to keep an eye on them. ] <small>]</small> 21:00, 29 November 2011 (UTC) |
|
An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> <b>] ] </b> 22:51, 2 July 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
*Lurkers attend: . ] <small>]</small> 23:02, 2 July 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
**This is clear canvassing: . Please do not leave non-neutral requests for participation. <b>] ] </b> 23:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC) |
|
OK, I've listed this for GA. It's the only one in it's category. Any help would be appreciated. We should look at its current state with GA-level in mind. I don't have any experience to speak of at this level, so help would be great. I think we need to expand the lead. You expressed previous interest in this so I'm letting you know. PumpkinSky talk 20:06, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
