Misplaced Pages

User talk:RL0919: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:52, 10 July 2011 editGazimoff (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,219 edits →Admin inactivity note: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:47, 5 January 2025 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,989 edits →Administrators' newsletter – January 2025: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User talk top}} {{Usertalkconcise}}
{{Archives
{{archives|title=]|image=Spidey balloon.png|]{{·}} ]{{·}} ]{{·}} ]}}
| auto = no
| search = yes
| banner = yes
| collapsible = no
| collapsed = no
| title = Ye olde talk scrolls
| image = File:Lipsum Message.png
| image-size = 100px
|{{flatlist|
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
}}}}
{{clear}}


== Administrators' newsletter – January 2024 ==
== Trial RfC ==


] from the past month (December 2023).
First I want to thank you for a conscientious and difficult close on the articles RfC. There is a draft in userspace of an RfC to determine the trial format/length/etc. I plan to move it into the project space over the next week but before I do so I would love to hear your comments on the idea, the options as they exist now and the format (or anything else you can think of). Thanks. ] (]) 02:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)


<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap">
== Slammiversary IX ==
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">


] '''Administrator changes'''
Thanks for closing ] {{la|Slammiversary IX}}.
:] ]
:] ]
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
}}


</div>
It's a tough job, to mop up. Actually, you might've just done something remarkable, 'coz if that AfD had failed I'd...well, IDK if I would have quit, but it'd be touch-and-go .
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">


]
Redirect does seem reasonable, and I agree that the original closer made a logical decision, too.


] '''CheckUser changes'''
I merely ask that, please, keep an eye on it; experience tells me, this isn't quite the end of the matter; here are some links for you;
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
*]
|]
*] ] ] ]
|]
*]
|]
*{{la|Destination X (2011)}} ]
|]
*] ]
|]
*]
|]
*] redirected 4/6/11 Reverted as vandalism -> ]
|]
*]
}}
*]
:] ]
<small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">]]</span></small> 00:16, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
}}


] '''Oversighter changes'''
:I understand your concern and have the redirect on my watchlist to watch for any inappropriate restoration of the text. --] (]) 01:43, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
::Thanks. <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">]]</span></small> 01:45, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
}}


</div>
I've taken the liberty to protect the redirect until 13 June 00:00 (UTC), since there is little point changing the article into a redirect unless we're sure no one can restore the article until the actual event. ]] 20:13, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
</div>


] '''Arbitration'''
:Just FYI, ] was recreated, with just one reference - which is to TNA itself.
* Following the ], the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: {{Noping|Aoidh}}, {{Noping|Cabayi}}, {{Noping|Firefly}}, {{Noping|HJ Mitchell}}, {{Noping|Maxim}}, {{Noping|Sdrqaz}}, {{Noping|ToBeFree}}, {{Noping|Z1720}}.
:You might also be interested in the outcome of ].
* Following a ], the Arbitration Committee rescinded the restrictions on the page name move discussions for the two Ireland pages that were ].
:Personally, I've kinda given up. <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">]]</span></small> 19:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
* The arbitration case '']'' has been closed.


] '''Miscellaneous'''
Please could you offer your opinion on ] - please see ]. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">]]</span></small> 12:02, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
* The ] is happening in January 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles in the ]. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,000 unreviewed articles awaiting review. ]
----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 11:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:EN-Jungwon@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1192518845 -->


==Featured Article Save Award==
== Socks ==


{{ivmbox
Hello!
|image = Cscr-featured.svg
|imagesize=60px
|extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia;
|text = On behalf of the ], thank you, {{{user|{{safesubst:<noinclude/>BASEPAGENAME}}}}}! Your work on ''']''' has allowed the article to retain its ], recognizing it as one of the best {{{type|<includeonly>{{Error|Error: No type specified}}</includeonly><noinclude>article</noinclude>}}}s on Misplaced Pages. I hereby award you this ], or FASA. You may display this FA star upon your userpage. {{safesubst:<noinclude/>#switch:<includeonly>{{{type|}}}</includeonly><noinclude>article</noinclude>
}} Keep up the great work! {{{extra|}}} Cheers, ] (]) 16:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)}}
=== Precious anniversary ===
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Seven}}
Congratulations to the successful saving efforts! --] (]) 14:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


== ] ==
Regarding your comment , I felt I should follow up and tell you that I've ] for socking. While I agree that one edit isn't enough for a vandalism block, the blatantly-obvious socking is blockable. Hope this is OK! Cheers, ] 06:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


How is the outcome of the ] on this article different from that of an ] on another article? Both don't have input from others, yet the outcome is different. ] (]) 17:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
== Del Rev ==


:The obvious answer is that two different people closed the discussions, and human judgment can vary. As far as I can see, I would have closed the other discussion the same way I closed this one.
What do I do now? Since you are the one who closed the discussion, you tell me. Do leave a talkback. ] (]) 12:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
:Took me a bit to realize which DRV you mean, since I closed a few yesterday and it appears that you may have had an account name change recently. But I believe I figured out that you mean one about BLP signatures ]. I can't say that I have any super-strong advice to give, but here are some thoughts:
:*For the one that was for a person already deceased, I think recreation would be fine, and I just said so at the new DRV you opened for it. You might want to contact ] and see if he would just restore it for you on the grounds that it should have been removed from the original nomination along with Elvis, etc.
:*For the ones that are still living, my best suggestion would be to see what you can do to meet the criteria discussed at ]. I realize that it is not an official guideline, but if you address the concerns it raises, I expect you would get a lot more support for restoring/keeping these files. In particular, if any of these signatures have appeared in reliable secondary sources (leaving aside the website you got them from, which might or might not be considered a reliable source), then evidence of that should go a long way.
:That's the best I can tell you for now. --] (]) 16:02, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


:That said, I would also suggest that opening discussions for these situations may be counterproductive to begin with. The previous AfDs were a decade or more in the past, and much closer to when the subjects appeared on TV. The article creators are blocked for socking. Considering that no one bothered to comment on the AfDs, I strongly suspect that if you had just redirected the articles without opening a discussion about it, probably no one would have objected. Less work for you; no work for AfD participants and closers. --] (]) 18:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
== Your block of {{u|Entertainmentnow}} ==
::Isn't redirecting a previously-nominated article kinda risky, especially right now? Furthermore, as I feared, any ''Survivor''-fanatic editor would undo the redirecting and then restore the article back to as-is without further ado. I don't wanna take the closed AFD discussion to review yet, but I figured you'll stand by your decision, right? ] (]) 19:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
::Almost forgot: AFD results... and even DRV ones are easier to enforce and more enforceable IMO than ]. ] (]) 19:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


:::Your comments make me more comfortable with the choice to close as no consensus, not less. If you are so sure that someone would object to a redirect by you, then putting an admin stamp on a redirect based on a zero-input AfD would be placing a mantle of "enforceability" on a change that doesn't deserve it. --] (]) 22:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Errr, isn't a 12 hour block too little, given that this user has recreated the page, has removed speedy templates 7 times and may have a connection with http://www.entertainmentnow.com.au? <span style="white-space:nowrap;">&mdash; ] <sup>]</sup></span> 17:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


== Administrators' newsletter – February 2024 ==
:My only goal was to stop the bot-reported removal of the speedy deletion template, and 12 hours should be ample to accomplish that since most A7 speedies are processed in less time than that. If the account is promotional for the website, then that's another matter entirely, but there was no mention of that in the bot report (obviously) or on the user's talk page. I'll take a look at the site and if there appears to be a connection, I'll adjust the block accordingly. --] (]) 17:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
::No probs. I actually repoted the user at ]. But I guess you must have seen his report at ] and blocked him 12 hours. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">&mdash; ] <sup>]</sup></span> 17:37, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
:::As far as I can tell, there isn't a connection between the username and the site you linked. The site covers Australian entertainers, but this account's contributions have been exclusively related to an entertainer in Florida. Their accidentally-revealed IP also geolocates to Florida. That person's site and company don't use the name Entertainment Now. So while I wouldn't be surprised to discover this is a ] account (probably the fellow promoting himself), a username block is not justified. That said, if the account resumes the same behavior after the current block ends, a longer block would be appropriate. --] (]) 18:34, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


] from the past month (January 2024).
== ] ==


<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap">
Notice you removed the "demote inactive admins" bit from Perennial Proposals. When was this implemented? &mdash; <b>]</span>:<sup>]</sup></b> 12:26, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
:Very recently. ] was closed as successful on July 2, and implementation began the next day. ] has ongoing discussion of the implementation details. --] (]) 15:23, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
::Huh. Guess I should pay attention to the Pump again. Thanks! &mdash; <b>]</span>:<sup>]</sup></b> 17:15, 5 July 2011 (UTC)


] '''Administrator changes'''
== Template:Infobox fictional battle ==
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|] (])
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}


] '''Bureaucrat changes'''
Would you be so kind as to un-close and un-delete the infobox to allow for additional discussion and input? ] (]) 01:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
:] ]
:By "additional discussion and input", I assume you mean that you wish to register an objection to its deletion? May I ask why you bring this up at this somewhat inopportune moment after the TFD was listed for over a week? (I suspect I know the answers, but just for the record.) --] (]) 01:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
::Sure, no problem: I had no notification it was going on. TfD notifications don't trigger on watchlists, and the TfD wasn't DELSORT'ed into any category. As is, I think the arguments, while unanimous, were one-sided and don't reflect anything other than a local consensus. Had appropriate notifications been made, the outcome would have been different. Since no policy unequivocally applies, the TfD amounted to an IDONTLIKEIT-fest. ] (]) 03:49, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
:::I have undeleted the template and relisted the discussion at ]. --] (]) 04:08, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
::::Thank you! ] (]) 04:25, 6 July 2011 (UTC)


</div>
==Request==
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
Hello, RL0919. I have a special request which I believe you help me. I would like to view the "Edit history" of the deleted article "Tony Santiago". That article was depleted by the deletion nomimator before he (the nominator) placed it in AfD, which I think was unethical. I have no interest in having the article posted once more, but I would like to view it's edit history prior to deletion. Thank You. ] (]) 20:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Tony Santiago


]
:I took a look at the history. While I understand your concern about the person who nominated the article doing heavy editing of it, it appears that almost all of his editing took place after the nomination was already underway. Before the nomination he placed some tags and trimmed one sentence, which is nothing unusual for someone to do when they first encounter an article. It appears that during the deletion discussion, saying that the article should be kept but "could be edited and perhaps, shortened somewhat", prompted him to start cutting material out that he thought wasn't properly sourced. And although he cut out a significant percentage of the article, looking at the individual edits and the reasons he gave in his edit summary, I can't say that his cuts were wrong. We ''don't'' accept Misplaced Pages itself as a source, or private letters, or most Facebook postings. If he hadn't cut that material, eventually someone else would have.


] '''CheckUser changes'''
:Anyhow, that's my perspective. If you want to view the full history for yourself, it is readily available because it followed the page when I moved it to your userspace. You can view it anytime by choosing the history tab from ] or you can use . --] (]) 22:55, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
:] ]


] '''Interface administrator changes'''
*Thank you for your response. It was very helpful. My real concern about the person who nominated the article is that (I may be wrong, mind you) I believe that there is a tag-teaming trend against me, by that editor and another editor; for example: and . I am hoping that this trend will stop. I don't mean to bother you, thank you once more. ] (]) 08:16, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}

</div>
</div>

] '''Guideline and policy news'''
* An ] about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

] '''Technical news'''
* Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. ({{phab|T326065}})

] '''Arbitration'''
* Following a ], the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
* Community feedback is ] for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at ].

] '''Miscellaneous'''
* Voting in the ] will begin on 06 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 27 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC). The ] of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically to vote.
* A vote to '''ratify the charter for the ]''' is open till 2 February 2024, 23:59:59 (UTC) via ]. All eligible voters within the Wikimedia community have the opportunity to either support or oppose the adoption of the U4C Charter and share their reasons. The details of the voting process and voter eligibility can be found ].
* Community Tech has made some preliminary decisions about the future of the ]. In summary, they aim to develop a new, continuous intake system for community technical requests that improves prioritization, resource allocation, and communication regarding wishes. ]
* The ] is happening in February 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{tl|Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. ]

----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 18:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1201592826 -->

== An invitation ==

]
You're invited to attend a ''']''' at the ] on Monday 26 February 2024. Hopefully see you there. ] (]) 11:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

== Administrators' newsletter – March 2024 ==

] from the past month (February 2024).

{{Col-begin}}
{{Col-2}}

] '''Administrator changes'''
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}

{{Col-2}}
]

] '''Bureaucrat changes'''
:] ]

{{Col-end}}

] '''Guideline and policy news'''
* ] of the 2024 ] is now open for participation. Editors are invited to review, comment on, and propose improvements to the ].
* Following ], the inactivity requirement for the removal of the ] right increased from 6 months to 12 months.

] '''Technical news'''
* The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. ({{phab|T353388}})

] '''Miscellaneous'''
* The 2024 appointees for the ] are ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ] as members, with ] serving as steward-observer.
* Following the ], the following editors have been appointed as stewards: ], ], ], ], ], ] and ].

----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 12:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1210490572 -->

== Administrators' newsletter – April 2024 ==

] from the past month (March 2024).

]

] '''Administrator changes'''
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}

] '''Guideline and policy news'''
* An ] is open to convert all current and future ] to (community designated) ].
] '''Technical news'''
* The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. ({{Phab|T313405}})
] '''Arbitration'''
*An ] to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".
] '''Miscellaneous'''
* Editors are invited to ''']''' for ], an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve ] and other core articles on Misplaced Pages.
----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 16:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1216613162 -->

== Administrators' newsletter – May 2024 ==

] from the past month (April 2024).

<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap">
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">

] '''Administrator changes'''
:] ]
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}

] '''Bureaucrat changes'''
:] ]

</div>
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
]

] '''CheckUser changes'''
:] ]

] '''Oversight changes'''
:] ]

</div>
</div>
] '''Guideline and policy news'''
* Phase I of the ] has concluded. Several proposals have passed outright and will proceed to implementation, including ] (3b) and ] (13) on a trial basis. Other successful proposals, such as ] (2), will undergo further refinement in Phase II. Proposals passed on a trial basis will be discussed in Phase II, after their trials conclude. Further details on specific proposals can be found in the ].

] '''Technical news'''
* Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Misplaced Pages. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. ]

] '''Arbitration'''
* The arbitration case '']'' has been closed.

] '''Miscellaneous'''
* This may be a good time to reach out to potential nominees to ask if they would consider an RfA.
* A ] is happening in May 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles in the ]. Currently, there is a backlog of over 15,000 articles awaiting review. ]
* Voting for the ] election is open until 9 May 2024. Read the ] and ''']'''

----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 17:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1220239146 -->

== Administrators' newsletter – June 2024 ==

] from the past month (May 2024).

<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap">
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">

] '''Administrator changes'''
:] ]
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
}}

] '''Bureaucrat changes'''
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}

</div>
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
]

] '''Oversight changes'''
:] ]

</div>
</div>

] '''Guideline and policy news'''
* ] of the ] has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in ].

] '''Technical news'''
* The ] feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. ]

] '''Arbitration'''
* The arbitration case '']'' has been closed.
* The Committee is ], including access to the ].

] '''Miscellaneous'''
* WikiProject Reliability's ] is happening in June 2024 to replace {{tl|citation needed}} tags with references! ''']'''

----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 16:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1227360647 -->

== 91.124.53.23 ==

Hi, I don't want to go through the hassle of filing a report at ANI and I saw that you were active recently so I wanted to ask you to possibley block the IP ]. If you look at their talk page (and talk page history) they are clearly making personal attacks despite being warned multiple times and they have also threatened to do sockpuppetry. Thanks. ] (]) 21:16, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
:{{yo|GoldRomean}} Already reported at AIV and blocked. If they do sock, you can file a request at ]. ] (]) 21:18, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
::Okay. Thanks for your help (and RL0919 sorry for wasting ur time). ] (]) 21:19, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

== Administrators' newsletter – July 2024 ==

] from the past month (June 2024).

]

] '''Administrator changes'''
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|] (])
|]
|]
}}

] '''Technical news'''
* Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. ] on MediaWiki. ({{phab|T6086}})

] '''Miscellaneous'''
* The ] is re-opening on 15 July 2024. ]

----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 07:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:EN-Jungwon@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1231927808 -->

== Deletion review for ] ==
An editor has asked for ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRV notice --> ] (]) 20:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

:I was surprised in your closure statement that you stated that there were mostly Delete and Redirect "votes" as it looked to me like more editors were arguing for Keep than Delete. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 23:29, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
::By my count (not the appellant's), 18 participants preferred redirection, 4 more were open to deletion or redirection, and 6 (including presumably the nominator) preferred deletion. This is easily more than the 17 clear keeps. (Two others did not provide a clear preference; one of those appeared to be arguing against notability, while the other was clearly against redirection but did not indicate an opinion about notability or keep vs. delete.) So just under 38% of the clear positions preferred keeping. --] (]) 02:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
::I just came to remove my comment as I said something similar at the Deletion Review. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 03:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

== Administrators' newsletter – August 2024 ==

] from the past month (July 2024).
<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap">
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">

] '''Administrator changes'''
:] ]
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}

] '''Interface administrator changes'''
:] ]

</div>
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">

]

] '''CheckUser changes'''
:] ]

</div>
</div>

] '''Technical news'''
* ] may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may ] when appropriate.
* Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via ]. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

] '''Arbitration'''
* The Arbitration Committee ] the following administrators to the ]: {{noping|Bilby}}, {{noping|Extraordinary Writ}}

----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 16:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1238586059 -->

== Atlas Shrugged ==

Hi, I do not understand why you keep deleting my input on the Atlas Shrugged page... The libertarians and conservatives site the work as an influence do in fact subscribe to "rational selfishness," the philosophy of the book.... So why delete that fact? ] (]) 19:53, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

:You may believe so, but if you want to insert such claims into Misplaced Pages you should supply ] ] sources that have reached this conclusion. And then be prepared to make a case that they are representative of a common viewpoint that that ]. So far, you haven't even responded to the ] that has been open since March. --] (]) 05:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
::I would have responded to the talk page discussion, had I known it existed. I meant no disrespect to you or the page, but the point I made is self evident. If they cite a book's philosophy as an influence, the meaning of that influence should be mentioned. That said, I will look for a credible source that shows this self evident fact. If I find it, I will share it. --DMW ] (]) 17:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
::P.S. ... but given the self evident nature of my comment, given the later mention of the philosophy later in this article, in the meantime, I implore you to reinstate my edit. --DMW ] (]) 17:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
::here you go... https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/column-this-is-what-happens-when-you-take-ayn-rand-seriously ] (]) 17:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
:::Reliable sources document that some people have said that they were influenced by ''Atlas Shrugged'', a lengthy novel that contains multiple ideas. But you have picked one of those ideas and proclaimed on their behalf that it is what they meant. That ''interpretation'' of what the influence was is not "self-evident". The opinion column you just linked is a better source than than your own imagination, but still well below what we should be looking for. Such columns are generally ], especially when they are not from a recognized expert on the subject and most especially not for claims about living people. --] (]) 22:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
::::Yes the book does contain multiple ideas, but that response is a bit disingenuous, as the main thrust of the book is the philosophy of rational selfishness. If you think there is another more major theme in the book, I wish you would put it on the wiki page, as the page itself states rational selfishness as the main theme. Why the reluctance to put the theme of the book, which has been cited as an influence to these conservative and libertarian thinkers, next to the comment of its influence?
::::Thank you for continued dialogue. ] (]) 09:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
:::::The opening paragraph of the article says that the novel "explores a number of philosophical themes ... including reason, property rights, individualism, libertarianism and capitalism, and depicts what Rand saw as the failures of governmental coercion" and also mentions Rand's own description of the theme as "the role of man's mind in existence". The section on Themes has four subsections. It does discuss her support for egoism, but also that the novel "caricatures fascism, socialism, communism, and any state intervention in society", and other topics addressed in the novel including ones mentioned above such as property rights and individualism. When any individual says they were influenced by the novel, they could mean any of these or even some other element that isn't discussed in our article. If Misplaced Pages were in the business of drawing inferences about what people mean (without using a source that states that conclusion first), it would make more sense to infer that conservative politicians who overtly oppose socialism and communism are likely to be referring to the novel's critique of those, or to its endorsements of property rights and capitalism. It seems much ''less'' likely that politicians who are mostly self-declared believers in Christianity – a religion that endorses altruism and is founded on belief in a divine act of self-sacrifice – are indicating their support for Rand's very un-Christian views on egoism. But in any case, Misplaced Pages is ''not'' in the business of such inferences. --] (]) 01:43, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

== Administrators' newsletter – September 2024 ==

] from the past month (August 2024).

<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap">
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">

] '''Administrator changes'''
:] ]

] '''Interface administrator changes'''
:] ]

</div>
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">

]

] '''Oversighter changes'''
:] ]

] '''CheckUser changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}

</div>
</div>

] '''Guideline and policy news'''
* Following an ], there is a new ]: ], which {{tq|applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past}}.
* A ] is open to discuss whether ] should be adopted as a ].

] '''Arbitration'''
* Following a ], ] (the topic and interaction bans on ], respectively) were repealed.
* ] of the ] ("{{noping|Cinderella157}} German history topic ban") was ] for a period of six months.
* The arbitration case ] is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.

] '''Miscellaneous'''
* Editors can now enter into ], an alternative for informal '']'' arrangements, to have a ] reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
* A ] is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the ]. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. ]


----
::Without trying to untangle the entire history, it is obvious from the pages you link and from the current ] discussions that you and ] have some disagreements. Not sure who the other user might be that you think is tag teaming, and I'm not in a position to say if any of this is intentionally aggressive or just a case of people who edit in the same areas clashing over their different opinions. There are plenty of others who are more apt to get involved in wiki-drama, so I'll leave sorting that to them. What I can say is that when things get to you to the point that you start posting to multiple people about being "sick an tired of the BS that goes on", it is time to step back and remember that it's just Misplaced Pages. I don't know if that's helpful advice or if it just sounds condescending, but I always try to keep a healthy perspective on what's important enough in life to be upset over, and pictures in an infobox are way down the list. --] (]) 17:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
{{center|{{flatlist|
**Thank you for the advice. It is well taken. ] (]) 18:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 18:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1242830842 -->


== SNL redirects ==
== Reopening Of The template:infobox battle TFD ==


Hi, thank you for performing the redirects of the SNL history articles to the new article as per the AfD. I've been changing any links to those old pages from other articles to reflect the new article, and I was wondering if it might be worth it to clean up and delete a lot of these old redirects to the redirects that are now pretty useless? I've compiled a full list of redirects that I'll happily supply if you decide this is worth looking at, but a partial list includes ], ], and ]. All of these are now double redirects; I have a list of many more. They can easily be changed to match the new history article but would it be better to just delete them and keep things simple? Having a bunch of redirects for potential misspellings of a redirect (being kept only for its page history) seems a bit much, no? ] (]) 16:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the message letting me know about this.] (]) 01:19, 7 July 2011 (UTC)


:{{Re|StewdioMACK}} There are bots that will fix most ], although you are also welcome to fix any that you find. As far as deleting them goes, that typically requires a ] discussion, and redirects that have meaningful page history are almost always kept to comply with our copyright licensing requirements. (See ] for more detail about that.) --] (]) 16:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
:Ditto. -- ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 02:38, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
::Hi, thanks for response, that makes sense - just to clarify, I didn't mean to delete those redirects with page histories that were just redirected by you, but rather, the redirects TO those redirects with no page history that will no longer see any usage. Happy to leave them alone though. I have put one of them up at WP:RFD (]) as I don't understand the context of it and it's not used, but I haven't put the rest up. I don't think it'd be controversial to delete them though. ] (]) 17:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)


== A barnstar for you! == == A barnstar for you! ==


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar''' |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar'''
|- |-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for helping with the RFCs. Let's hope they will lead to a fruitful discussion. {{=)}} ''']]''' 20:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC) |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I never extended my congratulations for the splendid rewrite that is ]! It's deeply humbling to see such a depth of research and wide coverage. Thanks for all you did there and elsewhere! '''<span style="font-family:Lucida;">]]</span>''' 23:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
|} |}


== Rose photos ==
:Hmm, my first ]. OK, that just sounds weird. If I test the functionality on my own user page, would that be wiki-masturbation? Anyway, thanks. :-) --] (]) 21:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)


A courtesy note, some of your photos were added to this ].] (]) 13:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
::I would have giving it to you anyway but this way I could also test the new WikiLove feature ;-) Wiki-Masturbate all you want but let me get away first :-P Regards ''']]''' 21:49, 7 July 2011 (UTC)


== NCORP and political parties ==
==Whack!==


Does NCORP not apply to political parties? Because the guidelines state otherwise. ] (]) 11:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
<div style="text-align: center;">
]


:Assuming you are referring to ], no one made that argument. --] (]) 12:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
<small style="color: #c00;">'''''Whack!'''''</small>
</div>
{{-}}
You have been whacked with a wet minnow for trying to gain more consensus in the bureaucrat desysop RFC by !voting twice, but being smart enough to to do it. (Next time, try somebody in the oppose section! ;D ) ] (]) 23:44, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
:Whoops. I had multiple edit conflicts and must have accidentally copied your bullet along with my own. --] (]) 23:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)


== Administrators' newsletter – October 2024 ==
== Suspension of Admin Rights Notification ==


] from the past month (September 2024).
Hi there,


]
I've noticed that you're working on this list using AWB, but my bot, ] could help to speed it up also using AWB but under "bot mode" - so you don't have to keep pressing save every time. Would you like me to finish them off for you?


] '''Administrator changes'''
Also, I'd like to remove any templates on the user pages which state that the user is an admin, so could you provide me with the page where you have got your list of admin user talk page from so that I can do a find/replace to remove the administrator template?
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}

] '''CheckUser changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}

] '''Guideline and policy news'''
*] are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to ] (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with ] from October 8 to 14, a ] from October 22 to 24, and ] from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at ].
* Following ], the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion ] to ]. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
* A ] is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an ] process.

] '''Arbitration'''
* The arbitration case '']'' has been closed.
* An arbitration case regarding ] has been opened.
* Editors are invited to ''']''' to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until ''23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC)''.

] '''Miscellaneous'''
* If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put ] and ] on your watchlist, and help out when you can.

----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 16:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1248355798 -->

== Invitation to participate in a research ==

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

]

<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 -->

== Important: Please update user script installation ==

Hi there, you currently have a user script installed from {{PreCode|Anne drew Andrew and Drew}}. Several weeks ago, I changed my username to {{PreCode|Anne drew}}, and unfortunately, due to an issue with script redirects, the scripts you have installed under my old username no longer function.

To fix this, please update your JavaScript pages (] or ]) by replacing all instances of {{PreCode|Anne drew Andrew and Drew}} with {{PreCode|Anne drew}}.

If any of this is unclear, please ping {{noping|Anne drew}} for help. I apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your understanding!

Thanks – {{noping|Anne drew}}


{{small|You are receiving this message because you have installed one of Anne drew's user scripts. If you'd like to stop receiving notifications, you can unsubscribe ].}}


] (]) 16:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks,
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Anne_drew/scripts-mailing-list&oldid=1253009784 -->


== Administrators' newsletter – November 2024 ==
]]] 21:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


] from the past month (October 2024).
:I got a suggestion for another message bot also. I'm more than halfway done at this point, so I might as well finish out. But if you want to remove admin templates, have at it. The list of affected users is ]. --] (]) 22:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


]
::Hi, thanks for the list, I've ran my bot through the standard templates, and removed them on the following pages:


] '''Administrator changes'''
{{hidden begin
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|title = Successfully Saved pages
|]
|titlestyle = background:green; text-align:center;
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}} }}
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
{{hidden end}}


] '''CheckUser changes'''
There was a larger list of pages where saving was unsuccessful, so this is if the user page redirects to the user talk page, or if they don't have any of the standard templates transcluded on their main page. However, this does not mean that they don't have the template on the page - as it could be under a subpage of the user - I'm not sure how to fix this - do you have any suggestions?
:] ]


] '''Oversighter changes'''
{{hidden begin
:] ]
|title = Non-edited pages

|titlestyle = background:red; text-align:center;
] '''Guideline and policy news'''
* Following a ], the ] proposal that went for a trial to refine the ] (RfA) process has been discontinued.
* Following a ], ] is adopted as a policy.

] '''Technical news'''
* Mass deletions done with the ] tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. {{phab|T366068}}

] '''Arbitration'''
* {{noping|RoySmith}}, {{noping|Barkeep49}} and {{noping|Cyberpower678}} have been appointed to the ] for the ]. {{noping|ThadeusOfNazereth}} and {{noping|Dr vulpes}} are reserve commissioners.
* Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the ].
* The Arbitration Committee is ] for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.
] '''Miscellaneous'''
* An ] is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{tl|Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. ]

----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 10:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1254686817 -->
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 3#Handwriting expert}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] ] 16:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research ==

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ].

Take the survey ''''''.

Kind Regards,

]

<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 -->

== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->

== Email ==

{{umbox
| image = Mail-message-new.svg
| text = Hello, RL0919. Please check your email; you've got mail! <br /><span class="plainlinks" style="font-size: 88%; font-weight: normal;"> It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{edit|2=remove this notice}} at any time by removing the {{tl|You've got mail}} or {{tl|ygm}} template.</span>
}} ] (]) 15:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

==] scheduled for TFA==
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as ] for January 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at ], or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at ]. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by ], who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist ] from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! ] (]) 11:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

== Administrators' newsletter – December 2024 ==

] from the past month (November 2024).

]

] '''Administrator changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}} }}
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
{{hidden end}}


] '''Interface administrator changes'''
Thanks, ]]] 22:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] ]


] '''CheckUser changes'''
:If you plan on programming a bot to do it, then what I would suggest is cross-checking the user pages against ]. If they have an "I'm an admin" type template on their page (via sub-page or not), they should show up in the category since these templates include the category placement. (If they've made up some custom userbox that doesn't do this, good luck. You'd probably have to check those manually.) Then you would have to look for the sub-page (which should also be in the category) and remove the template from there. --] (]) 23:37, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
::A spot-check of a few of these suggests that quite a few are blanked, redirected, or have no admin-related info on them. Other cases vary, including some that simply tagged the page directly to the category without using a template. --] (]) 23:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
|]
|]
}}


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
==What about the early warnings to the inactive admins?==
* Following ], the ] has been updated. All former administrators may now only regain the tools following a request at the ] within 5 years of their most recent admin action. Previously this applied only to administrators deysopped for inactivity.
Hello, RL0919. I happened to see your notification on El C's page, stating that "your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return". Per the posts above, I presume the same note appears on many other inactive admin pages. However, as far as I can see, what you say is inconsistent with the addition to ] (a policy) which NP made in consequence of the ]. The policy goes like this:
* Following a ], a new speedy deletion criterion, ], has been enacted. This applies to template subpages that are no longer used.
''Admin accounts which have made no edits or administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped. This desysopping is not to be considered permanent, or a reflection on the user's use of, or rights to, the admin tools. The admin must be contacted on their user talk page and via email (if possible) one month prior to the request for desysopping and again several days before the desysopping would go into effect.'' <br>A month, and then again several days before the desysopping would go into effect.. ? And yet El C has already been desysopped. What happened to the prior contacts, which ''must'' be made, according to the policy? I don't see anything like that on his talkpage. E-mails are also mentioned in the policy; have those been sent? ] | ] 22:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC).


] '''Technical news'''
:There is discussion about this at ]. The short version is that {{User|ResidentAnthropologist}} jumped the gun and made a request for the desysoppings on Meta, which the stewards fulfilled without checking to confirm that the process had been followed or even if the list he provided met the inactivity standards. ResidentAnthropologist has been duly ] and a couple of prematurely desysopped admins have had their bit restored. So far no one has asked to have the entire desysopping reversed and re-done according to the correct process, but notifying the affected users was seen as necessary, so I volunteered for that task. --] (]) 23:29, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
* Technical volunteers can now register for the ], which will take place in Istanbul, Turkey. is open from November 12 to December 10, 2024.
::Thank you for doing that, though it would have been nice if your notes had contained a reference to the policy and an acknowledgement that it hadn't been followed. Full disclosure, you know. For my own part, I favour backing up and doing the procedure all over again, correctly, and I see on BN that I'm not entirely alone in that view. Regards, ] | ] 07:22, 10 July 2011 (UTC).

] '''Arbitration'''
* The arbitration case '']'' (formerly titled '']'') has been closed.
* An arbitration case titled '']'' has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 14 December.

----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 16:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1259680487 -->

== Administrators' newsletter – January 2025 ==

] from the past month (December 2024).

<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap">
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">

] '''Administrator changes'''
:] ]
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}

] '''CheckUser changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]
:] ]

</div>
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
]

] '''Oversight changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]

</div>
</div>


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
== RE: Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity ==
* Following ], ] was adopted as a ].
* A ] is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
] '''Technical news'''
* The Nuke feature also now ] to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.


] '''Arbitration'''
Cheers mate, thanks for the heads up! ]] 02:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
* Following the ], the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: {{noping|CaptainEek}}, {{noping|Daniel}}, {{noping|Elli}}, {{noping|KrakatoaKatie}}, {{noping|Liz}}, {{noping|Primefac}}, {{noping|ScottishFinnishRadish}}, {{noping|Theleekycauldron}}, {{noping|Worm That Turned}}.


] '''Miscellaneous'''
== Admin inactivity note ==
* A ] is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the ]. ]


----
Thanks for the note, much appreciated. I'm not sure if I'll return to editing/admining, so I'll leave things as-is for now. '''''<font color="green">]</font><font color="blue">]</font>''''' 08:52, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 15:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1266956718 -->

Latest revision as of 15:47, 5 January 2025

Welcome to RL0919's talk page. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or let me know where specifically you'd prefer the reply.

Archiving icon

Ye olde talk scrolls:
2005-2006
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023

Administrators' newsletter – January 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

Administrator changes

added Clovermoss
readded Dennis Brown
removed

CheckUser changes

added
readded Maxim
removed

Oversighter changes

added
readded Maxim
removed

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Featured Article Save Award

On behalf of the FAR coordinators, thank you, RL0919! Your work on Harriet Tubman has allowed the article to retain its featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Misplaced Pages. I hereby award you this Featured Article Save Award, or FASA. You may display this FA star upon your userpage. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 16:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Seven years!

Congratulations to the successful saving efforts! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Hayden Moss

How is the outcome of the AFD re-nomination on this article different from that of an AFD nomination on another article? Both don't have input from others, yet the outcome is different. George Ho (talk) 17:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

The obvious answer is that two different people closed the discussions, and human judgment can vary. As far as I can see, I would have closed the other discussion the same way I closed this one.
That said, I would also suggest that opening discussions for these situations may be counterproductive to begin with. The previous AfDs were a decade or more in the past, and much closer to when the subjects appeared on TV. The article creators are blocked for socking. Considering that no one bothered to comment on the AfDs, I strongly suspect that if you had just redirected the articles without opening a discussion about it, probably no one would have objected. Less work for you; no work for AfD participants and closers. --RL0919 (talk) 18:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Isn't redirecting a previously-nominated article kinda risky, especially right now? Furthermore, as I feared, any Survivor-fanatic editor would undo the redirecting and then restore the article back to as-is without further ado. I don't wanna take the closed AFD discussion to review yet, but I figured you'll stand by your decision, right? George Ho (talk) 19:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Almost forgot: AFD results... and even DRV ones are easier to enforce and more enforceable IMO than WP:IMPLICITCONSENSUS. George Ho (talk) 19:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Your comments make me more comfortable with the choice to close as no consensus, not less. If you are so sure that someone would object to a redirect by you, then putting an admin stamp on a redirect based on a zero-input AfD would be placing a mantle of "enforceability" on a change that doesn't deserve it. --RL0919 (talk) 22:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed Worm That Turned

CheckUser changes

removed Wugapodes

Interface administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

  • Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
  • Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

An invitation

You're invited to attend a meetup at the San Diego Central Library on Monday 26 February 2024. Hopefully see you there. RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 11:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed


Bureaucrat changes

removed SilkTork

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

Administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Misplaced Pages.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Nyttend
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed Nihonjoe

CheckUser changes

readded Joe Roe

Oversight changes

removed GeneralNotability

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Misplaced Pages. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Graham Beards
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Dreamy Jazz

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

91.124.53.23

Hi, I don't want to go through the hassle of filing a report at ANI and I saw that you were active recently so I wanted to ask you to possibley block the IP 91.124.53.23. If you look at their talk page (and talk page history) they are clearly making personal attacks despite being warned multiple times and they have also threatened to do sockpuppetry. Thanks. GoldRomean (talk) 21:16, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

@GoldRomean: Already reported at AIV and blocked. If they do sock, you can file a request at WP:RFPP. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:18, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Okay. Thanks for your help (and RL0919 sorry for wasting ur time). GoldRomean (talk) 21:19, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Technical news

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review for Vivian Jenna Wilson

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Vivian Jenna Wilson. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Rei (talk) 20:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

I was surprised in your closure statement that you stated that there were mostly Delete and Redirect "votes" as it looked to me like more editors were arguing for Keep than Delete. Liz 23:29, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
By my count (not the appellant's), 18 participants preferred redirection, 4 more were open to deletion or redirection, and 6 (including presumably the nominator) preferred deletion. This is easily more than the 17 clear keeps. (Two others did not provide a clear preference; one of those appeared to be arguing against notability, while the other was clearly against redirection but did not indicate an opinion about notability or keep vs. delete.) So just under 38% of the clear positions preferred keeping. --RL0919 (talk) 02:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
I just came to remove my comment as I said something similar at the Deletion Review. Liz 03:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Isabelle Belato
removed

Interface administrator changes

readded Izno

CheckUser changes

removed Barkeep49

Technical news

  • Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
  • Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Atlas Shrugged

Hi, I do not understand why you keep deleting my input on the Atlas Shrugged page... The libertarians and conservatives site the work as an influence do in fact subscribe to "rational selfishness," the philosophy of the book.... So why delete that fact? 2600:8800:4021:DE00:836:FE33:DAE6:8908 (talk) 19:53, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

You may believe so, but if you want to insert such claims into Misplaced Pages you should supply reliable secondary sources that have reached this conclusion. And then be prepared to make a case that they are representative of a common viewpoint that that warrants inclusion. So far, you haven't even responded to the Talk page discussion that has been open since March. --RL0919 (talk) 05:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
I would have responded to the talk page discussion, had I known it existed. I meant no disrespect to you or the page, but the point I made is self evident. If they cite a book's philosophy as an influence, the meaning of that influence should be mentioned. That said, I will look for a credible source that shows this self evident fact. If I find it, I will share it. --DMW 2600:8800:4021:DE00:3C7D:CD03:E8EC:64CB (talk) 17:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
P.S. ... but given the self evident nature of my comment, given the later mention of the philosophy later in this article, in the meantime, I implore you to reinstate my edit. --DMW 2600:8800:4021:DE00:3C7D:CD03:E8EC:64CB (talk) 17:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
here you go... https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/column-this-is-what-happens-when-you-take-ayn-rand-seriously 2600:8800:4021:DE00:3C7D:CD03:E8EC:64CB (talk) 17:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Reliable sources document that some people have said that they were influenced by Atlas Shrugged, a lengthy novel that contains multiple ideas. But you have picked one of those ideas and proclaimed on their behalf that it is what they meant. That interpretation of what the influence was is not "self-evident". The opinion column you just linked is a better source than than your own imagination, but still well below what we should be looking for. Such columns are generally not good sources for facts, especially when they are not from a recognized expert on the subject and most especially not for claims about living people. --RL0919 (talk) 22:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Yes the book does contain multiple ideas, but that response is a bit disingenuous, as the main thrust of the book is the philosophy of rational selfishness. If you think there is another more major theme in the book, I wish you would put it on the wiki page, as the page itself states rational selfishness as the main theme. Why the reluctance to put the theme of the book, which has been cited as an influence to these conservative and libertarian thinkers, next to the comment of its influence?
Thank you for continued dialogue. 2600:8800:4021:DE00:C0D8:2083:8D8A:3C65 (talk) 09:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
The opening paragraph of the article says that the novel "explores a number of philosophical themes ... including reason, property rights, individualism, libertarianism and capitalism, and depicts what Rand saw as the failures of governmental coercion" and also mentions Rand's own description of the theme as "the role of man's mind in existence". The section on Themes has four subsections. It does discuss her support for egoism, but also that the novel "caricatures fascism, socialism, communism, and any state intervention in society", and other topics addressed in the novel including ones mentioned above such as property rights and individualism. When any individual says they were influenced by the novel, they could mean any of these or even some other element that isn't discussed in our article. If Misplaced Pages were in the business of drawing inferences about what people mean (without using a source that states that conclusion first), it would make more sense to infer that conservative politicians who overtly oppose socialism and communism are likely to be referring to the novel's critique of those, or to its endorsements of property rights and capitalism. It seems much less likely that politicians who are mostly self-declared believers in Christianity – a religion that endorses altruism and is founded on belief in a divine act of self-sacrifice – are indicating their support for Rand's very un-Christian views on egoism. But in any case, Misplaced Pages is not in the business of such inferences. --RL0919 (talk) 01:43, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

Administrator changes

removed Pppery

Interface administrator changes

removed Pppery

Oversighter changes

removed Wugapodes

CheckUser changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

SNL redirects

Hi, thank you for performing the redirects of the SNL history articles to the new article as per the AfD. I've been changing any links to those old pages from other articles to reflect the new article, and I was wondering if it might be worth it to clean up and delete a lot of these old redirects to the redirects that are now pretty useless? I've compiled a full list of redirects that I'll happily supply if you decide this is worth looking at, but a partial list includes History of SNL:2010-2015, History of Saturday Night Live (2015-present), and History of Saturday Night Live (2020-present). All of these are now double redirects; I have a list of many more. They can easily be changed to match the new history article but would it be better to just delete them and keep things simple? Having a bunch of redirects for potential misspellings of a redirect (being kept only for its page history) seems a bit much, no? StewdioMACK (talk) 16:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

@StewdioMACK: There are bots that will fix most double redirects, although you are also welcome to fix any that you find. As far as deleting them goes, that typically requires a WP:RFD discussion, and redirects that have meaningful page history are almost always kept to comply with our copyright licensing requirements. (See Misplaced Pages:Merge and delete for more detail about that.) --RL0919 (talk) 16:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for response, that makes sense - just to clarify, I didn't mean to delete those redirects with page histories that were just redirected by you, but rather, the redirects TO those redirects with no page history that will no longer see any usage. Happy to leave them alone though. I have put one of them up at WP:RFD (Slap Pack) as I don't understand the context of it and it's not used, but I haven't put the rest up. I don't think it'd be controversial to delete them though. StewdioMACK (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I never extended my congratulations for the splendid rewrite that is Harriet Tubman! It's deeply humbling to see such a depth of research and wide coverage. Thanks for all you did there and elsewhere! Aza24 (talk) 23:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Rose photos

A courtesy note, some of your photos were added to this article.TomStonehunter (talk) 13:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

NCORP and political parties

Does NCORP not apply to political parties? Because the guidelines state otherwise. Traumnovelle (talk) 11:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Assuming you are referring to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/New Zealand Republican Party (1995), no one made that argument. --RL0919 (talk) 12:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

readded
removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Important: Please update user script installation

Hi there, you currently have a user script installed from Anne drew Andrew and Drew. Several weeks ago, I changed my username to Anne drew, and unfortunately, due to an issue with script redirects, the scripts you have installed under my old username no longer function.

To fix this, please update your JavaScript pages (Special:MyPage/common.js or Special:MyPage/skin.js) by replacing all instances of Anne drew Andrew and Drew with Anne drew.

If any of this is unclear, please ping Anne drew for help. I apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your understanding!

Thanks – Anne drew

You are receiving this message because you have installed one of Anne drew's user scripts. If you'd like to stop receiving notifications, you can unsubscribe here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Maxim

Oversighter changes

removed Maxim

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

"Handwriting expert" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Handwriting expert has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 3 § Handwriting expert until a consensus is reached. BD2412 T 16:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Email

Hello, RL0919. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 15:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Night of January 16th scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/January 2025, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Misplaced Pages talk:Today's featured article/January 2025. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Misplaced Pages:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! SchroCat (talk) 11:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

added
readded Pppery

CheckUser changes

readded

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

Administrator changes

added Sennecaster
readded
removed

CheckUser changes

added
readded Worm That Turned
removed Ferret

Oversight changes

added
readded Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)