Misplaced Pages

Latest revision as of 02:22, 11 February 2023

July 18

Template:Red Card

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:04, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Red Card (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Depreciated template. Now totally unused. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:34, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete: Not totally unused (there's still one article), but should be as it violates the WP:MOSICON and WP:ACCESSIBILITY guidelines. I did add alt text to it for as long as it survives, but it should just go away. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(ل)ˀ Contribs. 01:56, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Yellow Card

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:04, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Yellow Card (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Depreciated template. Now totally unused. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:32, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete: Not totally unused (there's still one article), but should be as it violates the WP:MOSICON and WP:ACCESSIBILITY guidelines. I did add alt text to it for as long as it survives, but it should just go away. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(ل)ˀ Contribs. 01:56, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox former UK local authority

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:04, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Infobox former UK local authority (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan infobox template deprecated since 2009. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:53, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox British Anglican Parish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:05, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Infobox British Anglican Parish (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Nonstandard infobox template with somewhat random parameters that has existed since 2005 but only has two usages at the moment. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:51, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WNBA Attendance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:05, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:WNBA Attendance (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A template featuring WNBA attendance numbers. It's not a navbox, a boilerplate template or any other category. These numbers belong on the WNBA page and perhaps noted individually on each team page and/or each season page. There's no need for a template. --Jtalledo (talk) 12:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete I think when I created the template I had different ideas on how to use it, but since it only shows up on the WNBA page now, I will copy and paste all the information directly onto that page. Abontorab99 (talk) 16:19, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fan Siu Wong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:05, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Fan Siu Wong (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Set of template parameters. Unused, not even in the article Louis Fan. Not needed/ — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete not usedCurb Chain (talk) 11:21, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fearless class patrol vessels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:05, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Fearless class patrol vessels (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded by table, and data in infobox, at Fearless class patrol vessel. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:10, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Featured topic box tan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Featured topic box tan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused variant of {{featured topic box}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:06, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete not usedCurb Chain (talk) 11:22, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Federal Secretary of the Northern League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Federal Secretary of the Northern League (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A navbox that is not very useful. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete It's not linked anywhere, and it includes only one link, so this is not what a template is used for.Curb Chain (talk) 11:18, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Feelfreetoedit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Feelfreetoedit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Where is this supposed to be put? Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:01, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete It is not used, so there should be no problem of deleting it.Curb Chain (talk) 11:07, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
• Keep. It could be used on a User page (or part of a User's page hierarchy). It could be used, and I can see it being genuinely useful. BTech United (talk) 05:32, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
• Delete. Not used. Any template could in theory be used and be useful, but we do not keep unused templates on that basis. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(ل)ˀ Contribs. 01:36, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fijipoliticsboxend

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Fijipoliticsboxend (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used. Purpose unclear. Not needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:59, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete unusedCurb Chain (talk) 11:06, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FerrariWorld attractions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:FerrariWorld attractions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

3 links; 2 articles. WP:NENAN. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:57, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fico Ministry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was history merge with Fico Cabinet Plastikspork _―Œ 00:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Fico Ministry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template says it all: "No longer valid, new Prime Minister has been sworn in!" There is nowhere for this historical information to go. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:30, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

I redirected it to the article Fico Cabinet.--Avala (talk) 23:13, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Templates should not be redirected to article space. If someone writes {{Fico Ministry}} in a page, they will end up with the whole article on the Fico Cabinet in their page. I have undone this action. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:54, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

• Keep. What do you mean there's 'nowhere for this historical information to go'? Fico Cabinet is the obvious place to put it. As, indeed, I just did. Bastin 11:59, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Ah, well, there is now... — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
• History merge with Fico Cabinet, and delete the template. A slightly bizarre request for a TfD, but this seems to be what is in order. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
  • They obviously serve different functions. See, for example {{GW Bush cabinet infobox}} being separate to Presidency of George W. Bush. As well as Fico Cabinet, this template would also be appropriate for the article on Robert Fico, and potentially 2008 in Slovakia (for example). Since it has more than one use, it ought to remain as a template. You haven't yet made a case for deleting it. Bastin 12:21, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
    • I am of the opinion that, because it contains information specific to the Fico Cabinet, the table should be located only in that article. The other articles (Robert Fico, etc.) can simply link to Fico Cabinet, thereby eliminating the need to include such a huge table in articles to which it is only partially relevant. Therefore, this template is no longer needed. {{GW Bush cabinet infobox}} is only transcluded in one article, and is kept in template space due to its complexity. Fico's table is not so complex, so does not need to be isolated in template space. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:57, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:File Tree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:19, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:File Tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Appears to generate a folder-like structure. We do not require such functionality on enwiki. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete unused, unlikely to be used and unclear on how it can be usedCurb Chain (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Film More Information

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:19, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Film More Information (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Obsolete. No longer used. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:24, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete no longer used; I am not sure what its original purpose was, but I assume it wasn't useful, other wise it would still be used on articles.Curb Chain (talk) 10:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
• Delete A case of a good idea at the time not being used doktorb _words 07:34, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Filmation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Indeed, something is wrong, it appears to have been created by cut-and-paste of the other template, and only changing founders. It could be potentially recreated, but not by simple cut-and-paste. Plastikspork _―Œ 00:11, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Filmation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A slightly unusual case of redundancy: the template {{DePatie-Freleng Enterprises}} contains all the same links under slightly different groupings, except Founders, who are different on that template. I am unsure of the exact link between the two companies, but there clearly is one, and perhaps this can be reconciled in the navboxes. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Comment I think there's something wrong with one or both templates. According to the Filmation article, the two companies are competitors. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 06:48, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Firstministeranddeputyfirstminister

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Firstministeranddeputyfirstminister (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; the article First Minister and deputy First Minister uses a totally different infobox. Not needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:57, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fitchburg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:20, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Fitchburg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use template; information present in infobox at Fitchburg Line. Hence, not needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:53, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete: duplicative with Template:Fitchburg Line. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 15:52, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:KM Communities Welfare Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Invalid nomination. These templates have never existed. Feel free to re-nominate if you can find the actual templates. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:59, 18 July 2011 (UTC) Template:KM Communities Welfare Party/meta/shortname emplate:KM Communities Welfare Party/meta/color

Template:KM Communities Welfare Party (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Election box metadata information, redundant as party has itself been deleted. Pages do not link anywhere.. doktorb _words 05:18, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Whydelete

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:15, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Whydelete (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It's barely in use, can't be redirected, and most scripts (like WP:CSDH) can notify a tagger when a speedy tag is declined. --Σ _contribs 04:21, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• It doesn't even seem to be a decline tag: it's simply asking why a user tagged a page. In the time that it takes to template a user with a question like this, it should be easy enough for an editor to tell for himself whether or not a page is valid speedy material. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 11:04, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:First Nations of the Strait of Georgia and Southern Vancouver Island

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:24, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:First Nations of the Strait of Georgia and Southern Vancouver Island (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Covered by {{Coast Salish}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 03:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete No other region templates within BC exist; not quite the same as {{Coast Salish}} as Southern Kwakiutl are also in the region, as were historical the Chemakum. Coast Salish also includes tribes in Washington; post-colonial boundaries should not apply, which is the context of the name region here; {{Indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast}} is more than adequate.
• Delete not as per above as there are many like this -Template:First Nations on Vancouver Island, Template:First Nations in Southern Manitoba and so one. Delete as per the fact it is not used anymoreMoxy (talk) 04:32, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Five largest automobile Hubs in the World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:24, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Five largest automobile Hubs in the World (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non-useful infobox - arbitrary inclusion criteria. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:32, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete unused; also, what is an automobile hub?Curb Chain (talk) 03:05, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Hmm... one of these, perhaps? — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:06, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Foobar-unreferenced

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:24, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Foobar-unreferenced (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Obsolete proposal from 2007. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:29, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete unused; purpose unclearCurb Chain (talk) 03:06, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FlightAware Aircraft Type

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ 00:23, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:FlightAware Aircraft Type (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused EL template. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:28, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete unusedCurb Chain (talk) 03:21, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Flipbook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Gone. WP:G7. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:57, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Flipbook (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not useful. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:28, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete
  1. not a flipbook
  2. never will be useful
  3. unused
  4. unusefulCurb Chain (talk) 03:23, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
• Next time, when there's something that only a single editor has ever worked and and that editor is still active, just ask them. This could have been deleted in circa five seconds instead of going through the whole drill here. Less paperwork, more talking, please. - Aaron Brenneman (talk) 03:37, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Do you still want it? If not, it's G7 fodder. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:05, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
    • I was loath to tag and/or delete it while a nomination was going on, but realise now that this is a lonely venue. I'll put a speedy tag on it.
      Aaron Brenneman (talk) 05:18, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.