| Revision as of 22:35, 7 August 2011 editBlethering Scot (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers68,216 edits Final warning: Vandalism on Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:16, 27 August 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)Tags: AWB Replaced | ||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Blanked IP talk}} | |||
| == Notability == | |||
| Bobby Barr is a notable player please do not add tags of that nature. The Scottish First Division is listed as fully pro even if it wasn't its a notable League and players in it would Pass GNG. The division will stay on the list untill further consensus is reached which is no where near happening as you already have seen at ].] (]) 17:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :SFL1 is a third-rate competition with semi-pro players. Please provide evidence of enduring significant coverage in reliable sources, for this particular no-mark, before removing the notability tag. Thanks ] (]) 17:12, 7 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::It isn't the case at all. if you wish to discuss go to ]]]. ] (]) 17:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::You have no consensus therefore the onus is actually on you to prove otherwise not me. I take part in discussions The consensus is on the side of the league. I will once again advise you to go to the talk page ]. You do not seem interested to do that just add tags to articles and delete from fully pro without consensus that isn't discussing if anything thats being disruptive. I will not get in to an edit war with you. Also you reply on my talk page not someone else's ] (]) 17:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Please read ]. If you wish to pretend that SFL1 is "fully professional" then please find some sources. Asking co-contributors to follow policy is not disruptive AFAIK. ] (]) 17:39, 7 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :I an going to report this as you seem to be unable to be constructive you know the discussion page is there but you are intent on Not following discussion on consensus if that isnt disruptive. The burden is on you as you are the one trying to change the consensus at wpfooty not me. ] (]) 17:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == August 2011 == | |||
| ] Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, at least one of ], such as the one you made to ], did not appear to be constructive and has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the ] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --> ] (]) 22:34, 7 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:SharedIPAdvice --> | |||
| ] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you ] Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be '''] from editing without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning4 --> ''Do not change unless consensus has been reached'' ] (]) 22:35, 7 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:SharedIPAdvice --> | |||
Latest revision as of 23:16, 27 August 2022
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.