Misplaced Pages

User talk:Durova: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:17, 19 March 2006 editDzonatas (talk | contribs)1,417 edits Please, be more helpful and nice← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:21, 18 October 2024 edit undoZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,970 edits I'm Just Wild About Harry listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Not around|3=May 2017}}
<div id="talk" style="border: 1px solid #CC9; margin: 0em 1em 0em 1em; text-align: center; padding:5px; clear: both; background-color: #F1F1DE">
{{User:Durova/templates|pagetop}}
''Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting '''<nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki>''' at the end.<br >
].]]
''
</div >


*]: October 2005 – January 2006
*]: January 2006 - February 2006
*]: February 2006 - March 2006


<div style="background-color: #f0f0ff; border: 1px solid #333 ; padding: 5px; width: 495px;">'''Archived talk ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]'''</div>
== RFC on Dzonatas ==
----


== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXVIII, January 2016 ==
Just to let you know that this RFC was not certified by two users within 48 hours of being listed, so it has been deleted. ] 02:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


{| style="width: 100%;"
== ] and ] ==
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
{|
| ]
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* Project news: '']''
* Articles: '']''
* Book review: '']''
* Op-ed: '']''
* Timeline: '']''
</div>
|-
|}
|}
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 11:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=701440818 -->


== ''The Bugle'': Issue CXIX, February 2016 ==
picking up from <br>
I feel like I should get to know you better. I want to understand what drives you. I think we come from radically different cultural spaces. course you know me only as a guy who created some redlinkz to something that prob won't exist anytime soon. I'm a whole user tho. not that different from tons of otherz. I check out stuff around ] that interests me. I guess maybe I should understand better your idea of what's good faith and what's not. why are you pretty sure that my wikifying ] is not ]? there are a million red links out there. some of them point to articles that have a decent chance of being written in a decent amount of time. some, I'm sure, point to ]. anyway, there are a million, so why me & my edits?


{| style="width: 100%;"
I agree it's unlikely that an article would be written about it. and I am thinking pretty long term into the future. Like a redirect. do you see problems sometimes here and there about wikipedia and ever say "fuck it" and not fix it? ]<font color="maroon"><sup>]</sup></font> 09:30, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |
{|
| ]
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* Project news: '']''
* Articles: '']''
* Book review: '']''
* Op-ed: '']''
* Timeline: '']''
</div>
|-
|}
|}
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 14:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=705057126 -->
:Since you are completely inactive, I have removed your name from ] so as to not continue cluttering up your talk page with newsletters you probably aren't reading. ···] · <small>] · ] · ]!</small> 22:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)


== POTD notification ==
:what's up? got me pegged for a troublemaker/keepin' me on ignore? perhapz you could direct me elsewhere for the more philosophical questions. I'm guessing you'r more into enforcement, not so much on the pontificating policy formulation/ your own personal ideas on making your own ideal ]? I don't mean to make a bigThing out of a smallThing, but I'm a big fan of ] and a sort of "start-with-an-example and extrapolate outward" method of exploring issues. this includes getting to know the other person's POV. so, yeah. hope to hear from ya to the extent that you'r interested at all. in the spirit of peace, ]<font color="maroon"><sup>]</sup></font> 23:01, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
]]]
Hi Lise,


Just to let you know, the Featured Picture ] is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on July 17, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at ]. Thank you for all of your contributions!&nbsp;—&nbsp;] (]) 00:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm not deliberately ignoring you. I just don't see that this constitutes the basis for a prolonged discussion. I'd rather create and edit articles than engage in dialectic. Regards, ] 03:49, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
{{-}}


== Interest In Learning Restoration Practices ==
== DYK ==


Durova, per your userpage I am reaching out to see what I can assist with in re: restoration of images or other documents that can be uploaded to Misplaced Pages/Wikimedia. I have no knowledge of this subject at the moment and am a fledgling user, so any information you have will be beneficial—necessary programs, practices and all the rest. Cheers! ] (]) 17:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)


== POTD notification ==
{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
]]]
|-
Hi Lise,
|]
|''']''' has been updated. A fact from the article ''']''', which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the ]. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on ].
|} --<font color="#FF0000">]</font>] (])<small><sup>]</sup></small> 17:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


Just to let you know, the Featured Picture ] is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on September 24, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at ]. Thank you for all of your contributions!&nbsp;—&nbsp;] (]) 01:24, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
== Agapetos Arbitration ==
{{-}}


== Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity ==
There are minor spelling errors in your evidence section "RfC on Jonathan Sarfati." You have ] which should be ]. Also, "chargres" which I think should be "charges." ] 19:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


Hello! There is currently a ] of a bot to manage the ] ] by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the ]. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be ''uncontroversially'' removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at ]. Thank you! ] (]) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
== Thank you! ==
<!-- Message sent by User:MusikAnimal@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:MusikBot_II/Inactive_MMS_targets&oldid=748573976 -->
==wikisleuths==
I am a computer guy and think I would fine this very interesting, please let me know ] (]) 13:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
== ] listed for discussion ==
] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. <!-- User:FastilyBot/Task12Note -->
<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">ATTENTION</span>: This is an automated, ]-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details. Thanks, ] (]) 23:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
Dear Durova:


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Durova. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
You have the honor of being the 14th person to respond to my survey!


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thank you for your participation. Your responses to the survey are much appreciated!


If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The final essay should be posted on my user page no later than March 27. Stay tuned!!!
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=813406725 -->


== User group for Military Historians ==
] 01:52, 14 March 2006 (UTC)


Greetings,
== {{Article|Sweden Democrats}} Article ==


"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Misplaced Pages. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at ].
You seem like a reasonable person, and you have experience working in the edit conflict regarding the equally controversial ]. So I ask you to interject your opinions regarding the edit conflict in the Sweden Democrats article, which is largely modelled after the FN article.


] (]) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Basically, a member of the Sweden Democrats, {{User|SweHomer}}, says that the article is extrememly biased against the party. He says that the sources are part of a media conspiracy, that the article slanders the SD, and that the editors opposing him are working for the anti-racist magazine ]. He also says the SD's view is not fairly represented. He has edited only the "Response to the Controversy" section, as of now.
<!-- Message sent by User:Krishna Chaitanya Velaga@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members&oldid=545621623 -->


== April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive ==
I and ] respond by telling him that all we did was provide quotes from the party and include a chronological timetable of notable events within the party. This way, we hope that readers can draw their own conclusions. We used the ] as the justification for our edits. We believe that his edits are blatantly not NPOV. We deny his ad hominem attacks.


G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the ] is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:
Your opinion would be appreciated, and pretty soon we may be conducting a straw poll.


* tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
] 21:50, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
* adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
* updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
* creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.


As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
:I'm flattered that you sought me out and I'll see what I can do. Regards, ] 00:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of ], and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.
::Thanks for your help. The dispute is largely resolved now, I think. SweHomer says he has quit the edit conflict because he thinks everyone involved is a "leftist" out to demonize the SD. I basically agree with your suggestions, and it's nice to have a cool head in the debate to give some meaningful advice. ] 01:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up ].
:::I'd give it a few days before calling the situation resolved. Many people post "I quit" statements to Internet sites without really quitting. Either way, there was at least a kernel of truth to some of this user's protests about POV. I definitely recommend removing "racist" from the introduction. You might expand the defense section by mining some of this contributor's citations and translating key parts into English. Best wishes, ] 01:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


For the Milhist co-ordinators, ] and ] (]) 10:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
::::Ya, I guess you were right about him not quitting. ---] 19:39, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:AustralianRupert@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=831112019 -->


== goat ==
== Dated Historical Sources ==


]
Regarding your comments about older online historical soures, I'm curious as to how you "rank" sources because of this? Do more modern works tend to be taken over older when there is a conflict? How do you view them stacking up with regards to "primary sources"? I'm just asking your personal opinions and actions in this regards. - ] 22:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
goat
:That's a complex question. The most cogent answer is, "It depends." An older historical analysis isn't necessarily better or worse than a newer one. There might be a difference in access to primary sources, either because those sources were destroyed or rediscovered. More recent historians have the advantage of drawing upon a larger body of previous analysis. Certain older historians have the advantage of having earned the respect of subsequent generations. When I worked on bringing ] up to FA I used both, but tended to lean toward recent scholars. ] 22:13, 16 March 2006 (UTC)


] (]) 02:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
==Joan of Arc in art==
<br style="clear: both;"/>


== ] ==
Sure, I would be willing to help, to the extent that I can, on attempting to bring this article to FA status. I'm not sure what precisely needs to be done, though. Perhaps you could enlighten me. BTW, I did put in an external link to the Joan of Arc statue in Portland, OR. I will be travelling to Portland this summer for the Portland Highland Games and plan on seeking it out in order to photograph it. It would be nice to have a CCPL image of that statue. ] 23:06, 16 March 2006 (UTC)


], a featured picture ], has been proposed for replacement with ]. Your comments are welcome at ]. ] 20:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
:I'll think about the article name. Meanwhile, I found this on a "Save Outdoor Sculpture" web site:


== ] nominated for replacement ==
:Oregon Portland - Joan of Arc - The legend of Joan of Arc is alive and well in Portland, Oregon. Located in the historic neighborhood of Laurelhurst, Joan of Arc sits atop her horse about to ride into the Battle of Orleans, 1420. This piece (1924) is one of eight castings made from the original plaster mold commissioned in 1874 by Emperor Napoleon III. The original is located in the Place des Pyramides, Paris, France. French-born Emmanuel Fremiet is internationally recognized for his sculptures, often of animals, in the United States, France, Australia, and Africa. The Regional Arts and Culture Council, steward of the city’s public art collection, is organizing the conservation.


], a featured picture you nominated, has been ] with a ]. Your comments are welcome. ] 17:16, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
:I tried to correct the typo, but apparently the "edit this page" button at the top of their web page was not working. BTW, my Misplaced Pages email is now enabled in case of need for lengthier notes. ] 02:54, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
*The same applies for ] - see ] and ]. ] 18:16, 7 December 2018 (UTC)


== Precious ==
==]==
{{user precious|header=Nadezhda Durova images|thanks=for quality articles such as ], ] and ], for taking excellent care of countless historic photographs, in fine galleries, for service from 2005, - Lise, repeating from ten years ago:}}
Hello Durova ''': )''' Thanks you for your input in the ] article. I agree that the opening paragraph is too strongly worded and your other comments. About 3 days ago, I started working with the three editors that are fussing ovet this article. WGee had left a message on ] requesting SweHomer be banned. I checked it out and found all three editors were being a little rude, a whole lot stubborn, and were reverting each other. Mel Etitis responded the next day to WGee 3RR report on SweHomer. Both of us felt the editors need to back off editing the article until consensus is reached. I started a subpage to work on the text. If you would make your comments there maybe they will use it. I want to keep the discussion in one place and on topic. All three of them keep getting off topic and accusing the other. (Like WGee's original message to you with accusations about SweHomer ''': )'''. They are pretty reasonable people, so I am hopeful we can have a good outcome. --] ]] 22:02, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| title = Awesome
| image = Cscr-featured.svg
| image_upright = 0.35
| bold = ]
}}
Miss you --] (]) 22:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC)


] --] (]) 08:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
:FloNight, I did not accuse SweHomer of anything in my original message to Durova. As you can see, I simply told Durova what each side was complaining about. Also, why do you see the need to privately discuss things with editors? It seems rather suspicious. ---] 19:42, 18 March 2006 (UTC)


Thank you today for what you did for ]! --] (]) 04:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
== Can LIFTARN and WGEE please recpect the advice from FloNight. ==


A year ago, you were recipient no. ] of Precious, a prize of QAI! --] (]) 10:40, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Again you are taking turns in reverting. Can you please stop this and restore text to the version FloNight put it in?


==Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hearst and Morgan.jpg==
"Do not remove or re-insert text without discussion leading to consensus. You have been asked nicely by myself and Mel."
]
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by ]. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from ] is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an ]; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.


If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with ]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-disputed fair use rationale-notice -->
I put this in the "talk" page of everyone, so there can me no further accidents. These to reverts were of course not done on purpose, you both just missed to read what Flonight wrote. ] 12:11, 18 March 2006 (UTC)


<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
:Actually what it looks like to me is that you had removed some external links that the consensus had agreed were relevant, and they were restoring the consensus version. I can't do much about that kind of action on either side. You could request page protection. ] 15:16, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
::I took out the opening paragraph of the article and specifically asked that it not be re-inserted until there was consensus. There couldn't have been consensus since I didn't make a comment. '''; )''' ] ] 16:47, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
== Please, be more helpful and nice ==


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
This is part of a discussion carried over from ] brought to a more appropriate place -- your talk page:


Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
You stated, "An administrator warned you today about ]." That absolutely explains nothing why you think it is a WP:POINT. It does not help this situation to state it in such a way. JzG's comments, which made the WP:POINT link, do not help the situation either. It is obviously something that could not be said so plain and simple. Its insertion only aggravates the situation. In the theme of WP:POINT, it would be much easier to just state your point rather. As for JzG, it is obvious he is not impartial to everybody, and he admitted to it. JzG hasn't explained anything either, but he has made accusations. Anyways, such topics are very unproductive. How you come off to me is very rude. Perhaps, that is just your style to make your point. You go about and connect me with jhballard -- what for? What is the point? What do you really have to say about that? Again, its unproductive. Why do you like to riddle these talk pages with such junk? It doesn't have anything to do with the article.


<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Look at this, which you stated:
:''Also, there's a wise old saying about people who live in glass houses. As ] you began editing this article a month after me so your referral to previous archives constitutes an admission that you are ]. I welcome scrutiny about my own actions. Given your recent block history, I'm surprised you raise the subject.''


== Precious anniversary ==
What does glass houses have to do with the article? What is it that your have tried to insinuate? What does it matter if my past account is jhballard? Who cares if I admit to it or not? State your point. Perhaps, after you made fun of my daughter's name, and that I couldn't get you to stop -- that is the whole reason why I switched accounts. You are mean. My daughter is completely innocent to this. However, you and Sw posted personal information to this wikipedia without my permission. That is a violation of policy! I posted the information off-site. I never gave you or anybody permission to create such a scene over my daughters name. Bottom line, my daughter's name should have never been brought up -- period. The only information relavent from the family tree is the descension from the d'Arc. However, you and Sw went further than that -- you went too far.
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Two}} --] (]) 10:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


== FAR for Joan of Arc ==
Your actions against me, even the failed attempt at an RfC above, show that you have a personal motive. Whatever it is... it's not nice. Please, be more helpful and nice. &mdash; ] 16:23, 18 March 2006 (UTC)


I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 18:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
:I beg your pardon: my actions have demonstrated that my motive is to build a good encyclopedia. When I began editing ] had a cleanup flag. Within two weeks I had expanded the footnotes from 2 to 17. Five months later I've raised it to a featured article with 70 footnotes to 26 different sources. On a different topic I began a list and raised it to featured status in less than a month. Nine of my new articles have been highlighted at "...Did you know?" I founded the ], have never been blocked or warned by any administrator, and three editors have given me barnstars.


=== Featured Article Save Award for ] ===
:The only information I have ever had about you is what you chose to make public at Misplaced Pages. You posted your family tree to Wikifamilies and linked to it from an article talk page. You were trying to use it as a reference within the article, which compelled the editors to discuss it. I never insulted your daughter. Switisweti mentioned her in passing on my user page. He spoke in good faith but expressed himself poorly because English is his second language. When you objected he promptly apologized and I refactored my page. How is it mean spirited to suppose that your daughter's middle name "d'Arc" suggests you have very strong feelings about Joan of Arc?
There is a ] nomination at ]. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. ] (]) 14:33, 4 September 2022 (UTC)


==File source problem with File:Clapboard farmhouse in Florida 1911.gif==
:Your concerns must have been substantial if this was why you switched accounts. The solution you chose was ineffective. You understand Misplaced Pages procedures so I'm sure you know the alternatives. You barely made any effort to conceal that you were the same person. That left other editors wondering why, per ], you didn't just declare the change. You were party to disputes on two different articles at the time. I wondered too, but I let the matter slide until you accused me of sockpuppetry. The adage is, "People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones."
]
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the ].


If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion -->
:What I ask of you is no more than I ask of myself or of any other editor: cite a reputable source. I don't deny that I find your behavior and history of warnings and blocks to be disturbing, but none of that would matter if you conduct yourself in a reasonable manner where I encounter you. If I were the sort of person who pursued vendettas and violated policies, then I wouldn't be likely to admit to it. Why don't you get an independent opinion from an administrator? Choose any administrator you want. I have no fear of scrutiny. ] 17:47, 18 March 2006 (UTC)


Please refer to the ''']''' to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a . If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ]] 07:07, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
::It appears as a good encyclopedia was built other editors were frustrated and left. It has become a trend that disturbs many where contributors that have worked really hard have just left wikipedia alone. There are those that put serious thought into dissent, and they hate it when it is not respected. It wastes time.
::It comes down to immature attacks that put anybody into a defensive posture. Insinuations are an example. Attempts to gain numbers is another. Consensus is built buy agreements. There is no win, but there is communication. If one side tries to win it makes another lose. The agreement doesn't really exist -- just oppression. It is a dishonorable. Misplaced Pages is not here to make people losers.
::The Joan of Arc article has lots of hard work on your part, but it lacks an honorable effort. There was lots of hard work of other editors -- lost. Consider how you reverted five times in one day, so what if they were right or wrong. A single revert could be done the next day. Perhaps, assume good faith and figure the other editor wasn't done with their entire edit.
::Further, consider how you still try to link together the accounts and how you did it. Consider how you bring up "block history" on the article page when you have not even done your own research on such details of the block. Where is the assumption of good faith on either side of the block. Consider how you have gone off to "warn" others about me like to gain your support, which is straight up insinuation. What did you try to accomplish? Consider how you get rampant about other issues that are not directly related to the article. It's pathologically pitiful.
::How is the opinion of an administrator any different from any other wikipedian. Being an administrator is no big deal. Many people choose not to be an administrator on here. The opinions are equal. It does, however, shed light toward your use of such "block history." It was based on an opinion of an administrator. You like to try to exploit such opinions to your advantage as if it has greater weight.
::WP:Sockpuppet does not state that one person cannot have more than one account. If you look very closely, I haven't used the other account since you and Sw made such remarks about my daughter. I don't care if you tried to refactor it... you still try to bring the issue up later. Anotherwords, you don't seem very apologetic about it. Just let it go.
::I was about to erase this entry, but I remembered how other editors have left wikipedia. An honorable featured article would have wider support of those who actually worked on the article. It might be hard to obtain, but well worth it. The Joan of Arc article has minority reports swept under the rug by the "]." &mdash; ] 03:17, 19 March 2006 (UTC)


== ] ==
== Email ==


Durova, your email is not activated. I need to talk with you. Could you activate it or send me an email so I have it. thanks, --] ] 16:39, 18 March 2006 (UTC)


Hello {{u|Durova}},
:Copied from FloNight's user talk


As one of the original parties to the "Durova" arbitration case, you may be interested in the current ]. A motion has been proposed to modify principle 2 by removing copyright-related wording from it.
:''Yes, my e-mail is not activated. It's one way of ensuring transparency: all my interactions at Misplaced Pages are conducted on-site. Is there some reason I should change this policy? Durova 17:51, 18 March 2006 (UTC)''


Best regards,<br>] (]) 04:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
:You have policy? What's up with ''transparency''? ] ] 18:09, 18 March 2006 (UTC)


== Arbitration motion regarding Durova ==
::Transparency means that anybody could review my entire conduct at Misplaced Pages. In case anyone ever accuses me of going off site to circumvent Misplaced Pages policy, this proves I have nothing to hide. What could you have to discuss with me that can't be said on our talk pages? If there's something really serious then it should probably go to an administrator. ] 18:21, 18 March 2006 (UTC)


The Arbitration Committee has resolved by ] that:
:::A good policy indeed. ---] 01:03, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
{{ivmbox|Principle 2 of ], ''Private correspondence'', is changed from<br>{{tqq|2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence) <s>or their lapse into public domain</s>, the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki. <s>See Misplaced Pages:Copyrights.</s>}}<br>to<br>{{tqq|2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki.}}}}
For the Arbitration Committee,
]&nbsp;] 23:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motion regarding Durova}}'''


== Best wishes ==


I miss Durova. I hope she is doing well. ] (]) 01:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
::::Durova, sorry for the delay in my reply. I wrote this earlier and thought I posted it. This has nothing to do with ] or the editors on that article. I've been thinking about emailing you for over a week. It was pure coincidence that WGee recruited you to ]. I wanted to discuss something related to ]. It needs to be by private email so never mind.


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
::::I was quite surprised by your policy. I think transparency has its place, but some topics are best discussed in private. ''Don't feed the trolls'' and similar thinking seems to contradict your policy. I also have a lot of respect for WP users that use private email to settle disruptive conflicts. No sense in keeping the whole encyclopedia in an uproar. ] ] 03:04, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 01:21, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:21, 18 October 2024

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Durova has not edited Misplaced Pages since May 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
The WikiCup.


Archived talk 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83

The Bugle: Issue CXVIII, January 2016

Full front page of The Bugle Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016

Full front page of The Bugle Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Since you are completely inactive, I have removed your name from this page so as to not continue cluttering up your talk page with newsletters you probably aren't reading. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Lise,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Ty Cobb sliding2-edit1.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on July 17, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-07-17. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Interest In Learning Restoration Practices

Durova, per your userpage I am reaching out to see what I can assist with in re: restoration of images or other documents that can be uploaded to Misplaced Pages/Wikimedia. I have no knowledge of this subject at the moment and am a fledgling user, so any information you have will be beneficial—necessary programs, practices and all the rest. Cheers! Finktron (talk) 17:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Lise,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:MonroeStreetBridgea.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on September 24, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-09-24. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:24, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

wikisleuths

I am a computer guy and think I would fine this very interesting, please let me know BernardZ (talk) 13:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Wappen Rdecraon.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wappen Rdecraon.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Durova. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Misplaced Pages. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Misplaced Pages Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
  • updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

goat

goat

Programmer520 (talk) 02:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Duck And Cover (1951) Bert The Turtle.webm

File:Duck And Cover (1951) Bert The Turtle.webm, a featured picture you nominated, has been proposed for replacement with a higher resolution version. Your comments are welcome at Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/delist/Duck and Cover. MER-C 20:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

File:The Anatomy Lesson.jpg nominated for replacement

File:The Anatomy Lesson.jpg, a featured picture you nominated, has been nominated for replacement with a higher resolution version. Your comments are welcome. MER-C 17:16, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Precious

Nadezhda Durova images

Thank you for quality articles such as Nadezhda Durova, Cultural depictions of Joan of Arc and Congress of Arras, for taking excellent care of countless historic photographs, in fine galleries, for service from 2005, - Lise, repeating from ten years ago: you are an awesome Wikipedian!

Awesome
Ten years!

Miss you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Ten years again! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you today for what you did for State Route 74 (New York – Vermont)! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

A year ago, you were recipient no. 2121 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:40, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hearst and Morgan.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hearst and Morgan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Jousting helmet.jpg

Notice

The file File:Jousting helmet.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Two years!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

FAR for Joan of Arc

I have nominated Joan of Arc for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 18:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Featured Article Save Award for Joan of Arc

There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article review/Joan of Arc/archive2. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:33, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Clapboard farmhouse in Florida 1911.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Clapboard farmhouse in Florida 1911.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 07:07, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Amendment request: Durova

Hello Durova,

As one of the original parties to the "Durova" arbitration case, you may be interested in the current amendment request about the Durova case. A motion has been proposed to modify principle 2 by removing copyright-related wording from it.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Arbitration motion regarding Durova

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

Principle 2 of Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Durova, Private correspondence, is changed from
2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence) or their lapse into public domain, the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki. See Misplaced Pages:Copyrights.
to
2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki.

For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 23:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Durova

Best wishes

I miss Durova. I hope she is doing well. SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for I'm Just Wild About Harry

I'm Just Wild About Harry has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:21, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Categories: