| Revision as of 09:13, 22 September 2011 editBinksternet (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers494,938 edits Warning: Linking to copyrighted works violation on Cupless bra. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:23, 13 October 2021 edit undoMoneytrees (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators29,795 edits →Blocked: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| (506 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for September 18== | |||
| An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]<!-- ( | )-->. | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| (].) --] (]) 05:57, 18 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> — ] (]) 21:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For a great deal of hard work to improve articles on a wide range of topics. ] (]) 22:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for October 10== | |||
| An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]<!-- ( | )-->. | |||
| == Nepean HWY - Supposed Tram Line == | |||
| (].) --] (]) 05:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
| I know depths and depths of information on topics related to ], Melbourne Tram/Train network as well as the suburb ]. I study these 3 main topics daily, and I know nearly everything there is to know about those topics. | |||
| I was just wondering, if you would be able to provide a source or reference to an edit of yours on ] ''"There were plans to run the tram line down the middle of the highway from Glen Huntly Road to Westfield Southland Shopping Centre in Cheltenham, however this looks highly unlikely to ever go ahead."'' | |||
| Please provide this reference, or Im afraid that it will be removed. Thank You -- ] (]) 07:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == Blocked == | ||
| == ] article -- gay marriage == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' ''']''' from editing for ] by copying text or images into Misplaced Pages from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our ] and our ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. ]<sup>]/]</sup> 03:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-copyrightblock --> | |||
| Given what the beginning of the '''Marital status and relationships''' section says in summary, I am not understanding your removal of the gay marriage information at all. As I stated in my edit summary, "''This has to do with sexual intercourse just the same as other things that are prohibited. Gay marriage is prohibited due to one's sexual orientation -- who to have sexual intercourse with. It's why there is a Sexual orientation section.''" | |||
| At ], you two sentences cited to https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/fuel-shortage-in-lebanon-leaves-the-country-without-power-681499. I've provided your text and the source's text so the overlap can be seen: | |||
| Your text: | |||
| So... Exactly why should other prohibitions in relation to marriage and sexual intercourse be mentioned, but not gay marriage? We all know the main reason gay marriage is objected to is because of the disapproval of two men having sex or two women having sex. If you want this made clear -- its relation to sexual intercourse -- then that can be done. You don't simply remove relevant material because of ], especially not when such information has been agreed on the talk page as needing inclusion. Did you think I would not revert you without sufficient explanation on your part? ] (]) 09:13, 29 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :I on what it has to do with sexual intercourse. ] (]) 09:44, 29 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Your second revert makes even less sense. Like I stated, "Opposition to same-sex marriage is based on homosexual sex. It's one of the main reasons for opposition. Refer to the sources." Does a gay/lesbian sexual orientation have nothing to do with homosexual sex to you? | |||
| {{tq|Many Lebanese normally rely on private generators that run on diesel, although that in 2021 was in short supply.}} | |||
| ::If I need to take this to ], I will. Because getting into an edit war as silly as this is, well...silly. ] (]) 14:08, 29 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==] of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{tq|In October 2021, Lebanon had no centrally generated electricity after fuel shortages forced the shutting down of its two largest power stations, the Zahrani power station and the Deir Ammar plant.}} | |||
| The article ] has been ] because, under Misplaced Pages policy, all ''']''' created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one ] that directly supports material in the article. | |||
| Source text: | |||
| If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see ], or ask at the ]. Once you have provided at least one ], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Carrillo Gantner|request that it be undeleted|]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">]]</font> 12:42, 31 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| {{tq|Many Lebanese normally rely on private generators that run on diesel, although that is in short supply.}} | |||
| == Out of idle curiosity... == | |||
| {{tq|Lebanon has no centrally generated electricity after fuel shortages forced its two largest power stations to shut down, a government official told Reuters on Saturday.}} | |||
| I don't actually follow ] but I cleared up some spam recently while doing recent changes patrol. I saw that you were the next edit after me and you removed the historical material. I was just curious to know why, since the page is in projects outside my usual scope. I can see that a fair amount of the text you removed was more of a "in popular culture" type thing than historical. But as an outsider to the project, the 1970s stuff seemed potentially useful (though it seemed to be in the wrong section). Knowing stuff like this helps me with recent changes sometimes. I'll come across stuff that looks off to my eye and then find out there was something in the project MOS behind it. So yeah, just curious. ] (]) 19:29, 28 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| You later the second sentence into: | |||
| :If you think I've gone too far, feel free to revert. I just thought that a random historical note is worse than none. Those issues can be expanded in the linked article. ] (]) 20:34, 28 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| {{tq|In October 2021, Lebanon’s two largest power stations—the Zahrani and the Deir Ammar power stations—were shut down due to fuel shortages, leaving Lebanon with no centrally generated electricity}} | |||
| ::Not at all. I truly have no clue which is why I'm asking. I mostly edit film and tv articles myself (and predominantly anything "genre" within that group) so when I'm doing recent changes there are often articles I'll look at where an edit is totally up in the air for me because I don't know it's ruling project guidelines. Usually, if that happens, I leave the edit be for more well versed editors to look at (or maybe drop a note on the project page if the article has few watchers/little recent activity). Since I'm completely unfamiliar with the topic outside of pop culture mentions and some passing research, I really had no idea. ] (]) 22:53, 28 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| But you kept the first sentence the same. I looked a bit more and then found you | |||
| == Why don't you use sources? == | |||
| {{tq|An industry source said at the time that Lebanon's total capacity was about 2,200 MW, including 370 MW from the Karpowership barges, but was only generating 1,300 MW. Lebanon’s peak demand in 2020 was 3,500 MW.}} | |||
| I saw you at the article called ] and went through your contribs and saw that you don't use sources. I understand not using sources for general things, but it appears that you don't use sources for things that should have them or will likely be contested either. And then sometimes you get reverted. So why don't you use sources? And if you do, why so rarely? Do a lot of Misplaced Pages editors work like that? ] (]) 22:03, 2 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| The says: | |||
| == September 2011 == | |||
| ] When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to ], please ensure that the external site is not ]. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as ], where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators '''will be ] from editing.'''<br> | |||
| {{tq|An industry source said Lebanon's total capacity was about 2,200 MW, including the barges, but was only generating 1,300 MW, including the Turkish supplies of 370 MW. Lebanon’s peak demand in 2020 was 3,500 MW, the source said.}} | |||
| If you believe the linked site is ''not'' violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following: | |||
| :*If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article ]; | |||
| I noticed you copied text from our French article in between your edits on the article; I checked there first to make sure this wasn't you accidentally translating in copyvio. These are, at best, an example of ]. Spanning back to 2007, you were warned at least | |||
| :*If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article ] with a link to where we can find that note; | |||
| :*If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article ]; | |||
| If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. <!-- Template:uw-copyright-link --> ] (]) 09:13, 22 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| times before you were blocked for copyright violations in . Between the block, you edited as ] and ], and through the suspicions of Flyer22 these socking issues were brought to AN where those accounts were blocked and in your attempt to be unblocked. You were after your answers satisfied her that you would no longer violate copyright. However, since then, there have been | |||
| warnings. | |||
| But wait, no- just as I was finishing writing this, I see you created ]- which is a borderline G12 of https://www.energyreviewmena.com/news-interviews/item/276-lebanon-welcomes-new-minister-of-energy. Seriously? | |||
| This is not acceptable, especially for someone with 66,000+ edits. Sorry- I have no choice but to indefinitely block you, and open a ] where your edits will be systemically viewed for copyright violations. Given the extent and history here, I will notify the community about this. ]<sup>]/]</sup> 03:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:23, 13 October 2021
Disambiguation link notification for September 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nuclear facilities in Iran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gamma irradiation.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Gentlemen Prefer Nature Girls for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gentlemen Prefer Nature Girls is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Gentlemen Prefer Nature Girls until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
— Mikehawk10 (talk) 21:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shareholder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Priority.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Blocked
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees🏝️ 03:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
At Energy in Lebanon, you added two sentences cited to https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/fuel-shortage-in-lebanon-leaves-the-country-without-power-681499. I've provided your text and the source's text so the overlap can be seen:
Your text:
Many Lebanese normally rely on private generators that run on diesel, although that in 2021 was in short supply.
In October 2021, Lebanon had no centrally generated electricity after fuel shortages forced the shutting down of its two largest power stations, the Zahrani power station and the Deir Ammar plant.
Source text:
Many Lebanese normally rely on private generators that run on diesel, although that is in short supply.
Lebanon has no centrally generated electricity after fuel shortages forced its two largest power stations to shut down, a government official told Reuters on Saturday.
You later rephrased the second sentence into:
In October 2021, Lebanon’s two largest power stations—the Zahrani and the Deir Ammar power stations—were shut down due to fuel shortages, leaving Lebanon with no centrally generated electricity
But you kept the first sentence the same. I looked a bit more and then found you adding this
An industry source said at the time that Lebanon's total capacity was about 2,200 MW, including 370 MW from the Karpowership barges, but was only generating 1,300 MW. Lebanon’s peak demand in 2020 was 3,500 MW.
The Reuters source says:
An industry source said Lebanon's total capacity was about 2,200 MW, including the barges, but was only generating 1,300 MW, including the Turkish supplies of 370 MW. Lebanon’s peak demand in 2020 was 3,500 MW, the source said.
I noticed you copied text from our French article in between your edits on the article; I checked there first to make sure this wasn't you accidentally translating in copyvio. These are, at best, an example of close paraphrasing. Spanning back to 2007, you were warned at least 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 times before you were blocked for copyright violations in July 2016. Between the block, you edited as User:Bullaful and User:Rogr101, and through the suspicions of Flyer22 these socking issues were brought to AN where those accounts were blocked and the community seemed uninterested in your attempt to be unblocked. You were unblocked by Diannaa after your answers satisfied her that you would no longer violate copyright. However, since then, there have been 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 warnings.
But wait, no- just as I was finishing writing this, I see you created Nada Boustani Khouri- which is a borderline G12 of https://www.energyreviewmena.com/news-interviews/item/276-lebanon-welcomes-new-minister-of-energy. Seriously?
This is not acceptable, especially for someone with 66,000+ edits. Sorry- I have no choice but to indefinitely block you, and open a contributor copyright investigation where your edits will be systemically viewed for copyright violations. Given the extent and history here, I will notify the community about this. Moneytrees🏝️ 03:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)