User talk:JW1805: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 02:30, 24 March 2006 editJclerman (talk \| contribs)4,654 edits →guarana and sockpuppets ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 07:18, 16 November 2023 edit undoDonner60 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers236,025 edits not around since June 2014
(190 intermediate revisions by 98 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{not around\|3=21 June 2014}}
	Talk archives: ]
			{{Usertalkpage}}
			{\| style="margin: 0 0 1em 1em; border: 1px solid #8888aa; background: #f7f8ff;" align=right cellpadding=5 cellspacing=3
			! style="padding: 0 5px 0 5px; background:#ccccff" align="center" \| ]
			\|-
			! style="padding: 0 5px 0 5px; background:#ccccff" align="center" \| Talk page archives
			\|-
			\| style="padding: 0 5px 0 5px;" align=center \| ]
			\|-
			\| style="padding: 0 5px 0 5px;" align=center \| ]
			\|-
			\| style="padding: 0 5px 0 5px;" align=center \| ]
			\|-
			\| style="padding: 0 5px 0 5px;" align=center \|
			\|-
			\| style="padding: 0 5px 0 5px;" align=center \|
			\|}
			{{TOCright}}

			== ] of ] ==
	-----
			]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> — <span style="border:dashed #666;border-width:1px 0 0 1px">]</span>, and <span style="border:dashed #666;border-width:0 1px 1px 0">]</span> 11:01, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

			== Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference ==
	== Naming of Civil War ==

			Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
	I'm not sure why you don't think that the term "Second War of American Seccession" isn't used, but I've seen it in literature regarding the period, and the Southern States certainly viewed it in such terms, if not by that exact name. Sure, it's not as popular a term as, say, the "Civil War," but it is in use and contains historical context.
	:] 22:53, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
	*See: ]--<b>]</b> <small>]</small> 22:50, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

			On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (], guidelines for use at ]). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was <code>true</code>. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to <code>false</code> in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.
	== "That is POV crap. What on earth is 'Social Inequality'" ==

			For well-established users such as yourself there is ''']''' involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
	Hi, just letting you know that your language is offensive! ].--] 09:03, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

			Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of ], ] (]) 20:48, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
	...]
			== File:Doomsday Clock Graph2.png listed for deletion ==
	*Responded at ].
			A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] ] 10:51, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
			== File:Northern Ireland Poll.png listed for deletion ==
			A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> -- ]]. 22:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

			==Disambiguation link notification for October 30==
	:Could you please stop reverting the edit. I didn't write it, and I'm not taking sides, but it is properly referenced, and "Social Inequality" '''IS''' a legitimate term! It is not fair for you to delete an entire paragraph because it rubs you the wrong way.
	:...And because you asked, "offenseive to whom?" on my talk page, I'm just letting you know that in society stating things such as "that is crap" and "what on earth?" is considered ], and it alienates anyone you are supposedly trying to work with, who might hold a different opinion!--] 21:19, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

			Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] \| ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
	''Social inequality'' is a valid term used by millions of economists, social scientists, political scientists, historians and sociologists. And yes the US is regarded as having an appalling history of social inequality internationally. ]]\<sup><font color="blue">]</font></sup> 21:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

			It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
	== Your edits on ] ==
			== File:Nations of the UK.jpg listed for deletion ==
			A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 12:21, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

			== ] ==
	Please do not do that agian, it is helpfull for people who do not wish to read through all the debate. We are not signing the items, as it is simply a repeat of what was stated in the lengthy debate, for your benifit. Most of the comments are "mine" but that is because I copied them from the debate--and other people have edited them since!! None of the other people involved in that debate had a problem with the summary, in fact they participated in it, as it is a VALUABLE TOOL in understanding the topic at hand!
	:Your comments on my talk page were also very cynical and negative. Please try to work in good faith.--] 04:15, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

			Just wanted to point out that the names attributed to Ireland on your pictogram (impressive though it is) are wrong. You may well be aware of this already or take the view that it doesn't matter or something else. But I point it out just in case you wanted to be really accurate. In short, since 1922 the Irish state has had two names only "Irish Free State" (from 1922) and "Ireland" (from 1937). No others. So it's a pity the pictogram may perpetuate more misunderstanding on this aspect. ] (]) 15:42, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
	== History of Ottoman Empire template ==

			== ] ==
	You wrote: "rvt. wide templates like this usually go a the bottom of page". I had the same impression. Please see my message at ]. The guy seems to take a vacation. Please add your comment to mine, so thet he will not be especially surprized. ] ] 20:06, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

			{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
	== Declaration of Independance ==
			<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691987405 -->
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	Actually the Lee resolution was delegates to a commity in mid June. On July 2 the document that the commity put forth was addopted.
			<blockquote>Orphaned map.</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	Only two delegates signed on the fourth, and then most others signed on the second of August.

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	My source for the date of the addoption of the DoI is John Adam's writings, and my source for Hancock and Bartlet signing of the fourth is the World Book Encyclopedia (though I've read this in other places too). ] 00:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ~ ]<sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">]</sup> 01:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
	*That is not correct. Responded at ] --<b>]</b> <small>]</small> 02:14, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	Sorry, I'm having trouble finding the book that supports my Hancock-Bartlett signing assertment.
			<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>
	I'll try to get back to you on that.

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	However you may remember the quote of Adam's, to the effect of July second will go down in history for the celebration of independance. Again, I'll try to find the exact statement.

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	Nope, the draft of the Declaration was finished by then.

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
	==Democratic-Republican Party (United States)==
	Thanks for your vigilance at the ] article. It appears some of the posters have a political agenda. Did somebody go through and change references to the Demo-Republican Party throughout wiki? If so, let's you and me put together a strategy for changing it back. Again, thanks for your work. ]Griot

			<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:00, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
	Rjensen has made a hash out of this article too: ]. I wanted to call your attention to it. I'm going to see about fixing this in the days ahead. ]Griot

			== ] of ] ==
	FYI--Rjensen is folling around again with the ] article. ] 22:55, 12 February 2006 (UTC) Griot
			]

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	Thanks again for helping me keep Rjensen in line. This guy is all over the map. I believe he reads out-of-date history books for pleasure and copies long block quotes into Misplaced Pages whenever he comes across anything interesting. I also detect a conservative political agenda behind his edits. ]
			<blockquote>Orphan image, superseded by ] created by same uploader and hosted at Commons.</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	JW -- I did some major editing of the ] article today, cutting out the block quotes and generally tightening everything. I hope you will support me in this. I expect RJensen to join the fray. ] 15:19, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	=="Scholarly" sources==
	Will you please stop blanking key information in the bibliographies! Wiki rules say that we should follow the standards of the discipline--in this case history. History makes a big deal about "primary" and "secondary" and about "scholarly" and "popular" sources. I write popular books myself but students should be using scholarly books in their termpapers. Wiki should help them, so please don't remove the accurate designations. ] 20:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="color:#fff;background:Blue"> ★ </span> ] ] 20:47, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
	== Other issues ==
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	Rjensen is constantly rerverting my edits and calling me a vandal. If I make a whole lot of edits, and some of them include my zapping questia, Rjensen just rv's the whole article. He's unwilling to consider wikipedia policy as if his ideas are universal.
			<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	Can you back me up here? —'']'' 03:02, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	== Questia ==

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
	I notice you've reverted some '''References''' (BTW, it's always plural, whether there are multiple entries now or not) that have Questia links. Is that really an MoS policy? That site provides online access to a number of books and allows limited searching through the text for nonsubscribers. I would certainly agree that we shouldn't link to Amazon because they are primarily a bookseller, but Questia's a gray area. (I actually subscribe to it myself; pretty useful.) ] 15:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

			<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
	*I agree completely with JW1805 that Questia references are inappropriate. Questia ''is'' a bookseller even if they provide some free services. They are a very good resource, but linking to them shouldn't be allowed.—'']'' 15:17, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The file ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	== Wikiquette alert ==
			<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	I thought you'd like to see this: ]. —'']'' 14:02, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	==Du Pont family edit==
	In wrting about this family I am trying to address the particular problem of how a couple of dozen prominent and "encyclopediac" people are related to each other, particularly as their familial relationships are critical to their historical role. Genealogical information about this family is not "an indiscriminate collection of information," and is certainly "for people with some sort of fame, achievement, or perhaps notoriety." In this case the family as a whole is the subject, along with a couple of dozen individuals. Good articles about those individuals neccesarily must include much genealogical information, and my intent was to avoid duplicating it on each article, but simply referencing the family article. In many ways the Du Pont family is like a European royal family, and in fact, you will find articles on ancestors and descendents of royal families in Misplaced Pages, see ]. Perhaps I have erred in including too much genealogical information, but honestly leaving it out would seem like "an indiscriminate 'omission' of information."

			Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
	Having said all this, I understand your concern, and have debated it myself. What do you think would be a good way to meet all the objectives?

			<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
	] 00:15, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
			== Nomination for deletion of ] ==

			]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – ] (]) 17:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
	==succession box at Thomas McKean==
	Because
	*1) I think that's the part of the article it's most relevant to,
	*2) because it gets lost down in the bottom of the article along with all the other templates, and because
	*3) I can't find any policy that says I can't do it.

	And I'm not sure I understand why you continue to work the du Pont issue after I made a very substantial effort to address your concern. ] 02:58, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

	*It makes all the sense in the world for the reasons I have given, and does nothing to disrupt the consistent look of the articles. It still follows the verbal part of the article and only preceeds other reference information and templates. What makes no sense is a slavish dedication to repeating a convention that produces an inferior product. How about giving it some serious thought for a while? Like I have seriously considered (and implemented) many of your thoughts. ] 03:47, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

	== Human rights portal ==

	{{hr portal}}

	--] 12:24, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

	== Hunting of the Snark - Truth Revealed ==

	Hi, I saw your last post on the ] page, I uploaded an image which should help clear up all the insanity over the "interpretations". Carrol never divulged enough information regarding the Boojum, however I believe Henry Holiday added an easter egg by hiding ''his'' interpretation of the Boojum along with the fate of the Bake in his last illustrated lanel - see for yourself. ] 11:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

	== POV editor ==

	Recently I came across User:Rjensen, and his consistent string of POV edits, and noticed that you have had some conflict with Rjensen in the past. Is this guy really relied on by some editors as an authoritative source of historical fact somewhat often, as he seems to be? I mean, . If you continue to have conflict with Rjensen, I would support an ] if you chose to post one. Just FYI. - <font color="#013220">]</font>·''<font color="#465945" size="1">]</font>'' 23:14, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

	* Jersyko sent me the same message as what's posted here ↑, and I'm considering and RFC.—'']'' 01:15, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

	== ] ==

	Can you please give me some help? You, and some other users have been having trouble with Rjensen and now he's causing more problems. See ].—'']'' 13:17, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

	== No problem ==

	Go ahead and delete my comments. I've already blocked both sockpuppets. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:30, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

	Hi; I saw the AfD. I think redirects are handled at ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 22:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

	== Zephram Stark ==

	That explains a lot; I've encountered the unhinged Mr Stark before. Reverting his edits is usual practice in cases like this, but not usually Talk page material. Still, there's nothing there that will be any great loss. --] (]) 21:52, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

	== Deleting a photo ==

	Hey, I was hoping you could help me out with something. I've never gone through the process of getting a photo deleted. I think that this photo ] should be deleted as its taken directly from the CBC web site. Would that be a speedy delete or an image for deletion? ] 23:34, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

	== Self promotion ==

	Hey give me a break--
	I have NOT violated the Wiki rules about "Vanity information can come in many forms. It can come in the form of an entire article, or it can come in more subtle, but equally unencyclopedic advertising links, personal page links in articles, personal or semi-personal photos, or any other information that appears to be intended to distract readers away from the main topic of any article towards the promotion of personal or commercial interests."
	DISTRACT READERS --not me: I am pointing them to lots of useful sites related to political etc topics. (These sites, which I did indeed design, were sponsored by several foundations, especially the Dirksen Foundation and the NEH.) ] 03:35, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

	==Conversations==
	I am entirely comfortable with carrying on conversations with whomsoever I chose. Before reverting those contributions, read them, and see if there is anything even faintly trollish, offensive or otherwise objectionable about them. And if (as I suspect) you find there isn't, pause for a moment, and consider this:

	''If a tree falls in a forest but no one hears it, does it make a sound?''

	Depending on your answer, you might then just think it best to leave things well alone.

	Well, it's just a thought. ] 17:01, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

	:JW, I checked the Admin noticeboard, and taking heed of your concerns I have removed the "offending" images, and have adopted all of the content the authorship of which you objected to, as my own. I'm not a banned user, nor is any of the content, of itself, objectionable. Presumably now it need not be reverted or deleted? ] 17:40, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

	== ] ==
	::I had a look at this article. I've never heard of this writer, but he has several books listed on Amazon UK and Amazon US, which seem to be well received, and he gets plenty of non-Misplaced Pages Google Hits. The article seems to be factual, written from a neutral point of view, and of commensurate length with the notability of its subject. What's the objection to the article? ] 17:31, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

	== Generations template ==

	Could you please sort out Rjensen who is constantly deleting the template from the articles of ], ], ] and ]. I have tried to discuss it with him but he continues to disregard any relevance that these time-periods had on the American generations of which the generations have taken their names!

	== guarana, guaranine, banned and sockpuppets ==

	I'm too new to have learned how to know who is banned and who are his/hers sockpuppets. Are all those reverting chemical info with references to databases sockpupetts of a banned user? I don't know what's their agenda, but guarana extracts or drinks are to guaranine like tea is to teine, coffee is to caffeine, and mate tea is to mateine. All current chemical official databases used by the NLM and the ACS define as synonyms: guaranine, mateine, mateina, teine, teina, caffeine, cafeina. What can I do so the chemistry prevails, as it should in an encyclopedia? ] 02:30, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:18, 16 November 2023

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. JW1805 has not edited Misplaced Pages since 21 June 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JW1805.


Talk page archives
Archive 1 (13 Sep 04 - 7 Dec 05)
Archive 2 (9 Dec 05 - 31 Mar 06)
Archive 3 (3 Apr 06 - 22 Jun 06)
Archive 4 (31 Jul 06 - 22 Apr 08)
Archive 5 (2008 - 2009)

Nomination for deletion of Template:IrishNobel

Template:IrishNobel has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:01, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:48, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Doomsday Clock Graph2.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doomsday Clock Graph2.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 10:51, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Northern Ireland Poll.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Northern Ireland Poll.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Fifteen Decisive Battles of the World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul K. Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Nations of the UK.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nations of the UK.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:21, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

History of the formation of the United Kingdom

Just wanted to point out that the names attributed to Ireland on your pictogram (impressive though it is) are wrong. You may well be aware of this already or take the view that it doesn't matter or something else. But I point it out just in case you wanted to be really accurate. In short, since 1922 the Irish state has had two names only "Irish Free State" (from 1922) and "Ireland" (from 1937). No others. So it's a pity the pictogram may perpetuate more misunderstanding on this aspect. Frenchmalawi (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Apalachicola Map 1943.jpg

The file File:Apalachicola Map 1943.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.