Revision as of 07:45, 10 October 2011 editJimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,538 editsm →Biography← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:57, 26 December 2024 edit undoGraham11 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,149 editsNo edit summary | ||
(264 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|English politician, philosopher and writer (1671–1713)}} | |||
] | |||
{{Expand German|topic=bio|Anthony Ashley Cooper, 3. Earl of Shaftesbury|date=January 2022}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2020}} | |||
{{Use British English|date=May 2012}} | |||
{{Infobox philosopher | |||
| region = ] | |||
| era = ]<br />] | |||
| honorific_prefix = ] | |||
| name = The Earl of Shaftesbury | |||
| image = File:Engraving of Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury.jpg | |||
| birth_date = {{Birth date|df=yes|1671|02|26}} | |||
| birth_place = ], England | |||
| death_date = {{Death date and age|df=yes|1713|02|16|1671}} | |||
| death_place = ], Naples | |||
| school_tradition = ] | |||
|Thomas Blackwell]] · ] · ] | |||
}} | |||
'''Anthony Ashley Cooper, 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury''' (26 February 1671 – 16 February 1713) was an English peer, ] politician, philosopher and writer. | |||
{{1911}} | |||
== |
==Early life== | ||
He was born at ] in London, the son and first child of the future ] and his wife ], daughter of ]. | |||
He was born at ] in ], the grandson of ] and son of ]. His mother was Lady Dorothy Manners, daughter of ]. According to a story told by the third earl, the marriage was negotiated by ], who was a trusted friend of the first earl. The second Lord Shaftesbury appears to have been both physically and mentally inadequate. At the age of three his son was made over to the formal guardianship of his grandfather. Locke, who in his capacity of medical attendant to the Ashley household, had already assisted at the child's birth, was now entrusted with the supervision of his education. This was conducted according to the principles enunciated in Locke's ''Thoughts concerning Education'', and the method of teaching ] and ] conversationally was pursued with such success by his instructress, Elizabeth Birch, that at the age of eleven, it is said, Ashley could read both languages with ease. | |||
Letters sent to his parents reveal ] attempted by his mother in refusing to see her son unless he cut off all ties to his sickly and secluded father. At the age of three Ashley-Cooper was made over to the formal guardianship of his grandfather ]. ], as medical attendant to the Ashley household, was entrusted with the supervision of his education. It was conducted according to the principles of Locke's '']'' (1693), and the method of teaching ] and ] conversationally was pursued by his instructress, Elizabeth Birch. At the age of eleven, it is said, Ashley could read both languages with ease.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=763}} Birch had moved to Clapham and Ashley spent some years there with her.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.claphamhistorian.com|title=About|website=The Clapham Historian|access-date=2016-04-04}}</ref> | |||
In November 1683, some months after the death of the first Earl, his father sent him to ] as a warden's boarder. Being shy and mocked because of his grandfather, he appears to have been miserable at school. He left Winchester in 1686 for a course of foreign travel. This brought him into contact with artistic and classical associations which would strongly influence his character and opinions. On his travels he apparently did not seek the conversation of other young English gentlemen on their travels, but rather that of their tutors, with whom he could converse on congenial topics. | |||
] designed to illustrate his Neo-Platonist beliefs |
] designed to illustrate his ] beliefs]] | ||
In 1689, the year after the "]", Lord Ashley returned to England, and for nearly five years he appears to have led a quiet and studious life. There can be no doubt that the greater part of his attention was directed to the perusal of classical authors and to the attempt to realize the true spirit of classical antiquity. He had no intention, however, of becoming a recluse. He became parliamentary candidate for the ] and was returned on 21 May 1695. He soon distinguished himself by a speech in support of the Bill for Regulating Trials in Cases of Treason, one provision of which was that a person indicted for ] or ] should be allowed the assistance of counsel. Although a ], Ashley could not be depended on to give a party vote. He was always ready to support propositions from other quarters, if they appeared to him to promote the liberty of the subject and the independence of parliament. His poor health forced him to retire from parliament at the dissolution of July 1698. He suffered from ], a complaint which was aggravated by the London smoke. | |||
In 1683, after the death of the first Earl, his father sent Lord Ashley, as he now was by courtesy, to ]. Under a Scottish tutor, Daniel Denoune, he began a continental tour with two older companions, ], and ].<ref name="ODNB">{{cite ODNB|id=6209|title=Cooper, Anthony Ashley, third Earl of Shaftesbury (1671–1713)|first=Lawrence E.|last=Klein}}</ref> | |||
Lord Ashley now retired to the ], where he became acquainted with ], ], ], the English ] merchant, at whose house Locke had resided during his stay at ], and probably ] and the rest of the literary circle of which Locke had been a cherished and honoured member nine or ten years before. To Lord Ashley this society was probably far more congenial than his surroundings in England. Unrestrained conversation on the topics which most interested him—], ], ], ]—was at this time to be had in the Netherlands with less danger and in greater abundance than in any other country in the world. To the period of this sojourn in the Netherlands must probably be referred the surreptitious impression or publication of an imperfect edition of the ''Inquiry concerning Virtue'', from a rough draught, sketched when he was only twenty years of age. This liberty was taken, during his absence, by ]. | |||
==Under William and Mary== | |||
After an absence of over twelve months, Ashley returned to England, and soon succeeded his father as ]. He took an active part, on the Whig side, in the general election of 1700–1701, and again, with more success, in the autumn election of 1701. It is said that ] showed his appreciation of Shaftesbury's services on this latter occasion by offering him a ], which, however, his worsening health compelled him to decline. Had the King's life continued, Shaftesbury's influence at court would probably have been considerable. After the first few weeks of ]'s reign, Shaftesbury, who had been deprived of the vice-admiralty of ], returned to his retired life, but his letters to ] show that he retained a keen interest in politics. | |||
After the ], Lord Ashley returned to England in 1689. It took five years, but he entered public life, as a parliamentary candidate for the ], and was returned on 21 May 1695. He spoke for the Bill for Regulating Trials in Cases of Treason, one provision of which was that a person indicted for ] or ] should be allowed the assistance of counsel.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=763}} | |||
Although a ], Ashley was not partisan. His poor health forced him to retire from parliament at the dissolution of July 1698. He suffered from ].{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=763}} The following year, to escape the London environment, he purchased a property in ],<ref name="ODNB"/> adding a 50-foot extension to the existing building to house his bedchamber and Library, and planting fruit trees and vines. He sold the property to ] in 1710.<ref name="Hist1811">{{cite book|title=The Environs of London: Being an Historical Account of the Towns, Villages, and Hamlets, Within Twelve Miles of that Capital : Interspersed with Biographical Anecdotes|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UykGAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA110|year=1811|publisher=T. Cadell and W. Davies|pages=110–111}}</ref> | |||
In August 1703, he again settled in the ], in the air of which he seems, like Locke, to have had great faith. At ] he lived, he says in a letter to his steward Wheelock, at the rate of less than £200 a year, and yet had much to dispose of and spend beyond convenient living. He returned to England, much improved in health, in August 1704. Although he had received immediate benefit from his stay abroad, he was showing symptoms of ], and gradually became a confirmed invalid. His occupations were now almost exclusively literary, and from this time forward he was engaged in writing, completing or revising the treatises which were afterwards included in the ''Characteristics''. He continued, however, to take a warm interest in politics, both home and foreign, and especially in the war against France, of which he was an enthusiastic supporter. | |||
He was ] of the English colony of Carolina in North America and the Bahamas during this time. | |||
Shaftesbury was nearly forty before he married, and even then he appears to have taken this step at the urgent instigation of his friends, mainly to supply a successor to the title. The object of his choice (or rather of his second choice, for an earlier project of marriage had shortly before fallen through) was Jane Ewer, the daughter of a ] gentleman. The marriage took place in the autumn of 1709, and on 9 February 1710/1, was born at his house at ], in Surrey, his only child and heir, the fourth Earl, to whose manuscript accounts we are in great part indebted for the details of his father's life. The match appears to have been happy, though Shaftesbury had little sentiment on the subject of married life. | |||
Lord Ashley moved to the ]. Away for over a year, Ashley returned to England, and shortly succeeded his father as ]. He took an active part, on the Whig side in the ], in the ], and again, with more success, in the ].<ref name="ODNB" /> | |||
With the exception of a ''Preface to the Sermons of Dr Whichcote'', one of the ] or ]s, published in 1698, Shaftesbury appears to have printed nothing himself till 1708. About this time the French ]s attracted much attention by their extravagances and follies. Various repressive remedies were proposed, but Shaftesbury maintained that fanaticism was best defeated by raillery and good-humour. In support of this view he wrote a letter ''Concerning Enthusiasm to Lord Somers'', dated September 1707, which was published anonymously in the following year, and provoked several replies. In May 1709, he returned to the subject, and printed another letter, entitled ''{{lang|la|Sensus Communis}}, an Essay on the Freedom of Wit and Humour''. In the same year he also published ''The Moralists, a Philosophical Rhapsody'', and in the following year ''Soliloquy, or Advice to an Author''. None of these pieces seems to have been printed either with his name or his initials. In 1711, the ''Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times'' appeared in three volumes, also without any name or initials on the title-page, and without even the name of a printer. These volumes contain in addition to the four treatises already mentioned, ''Miscellaneous Reflections'', now first printed, and the ''Inquiry concerning Virtue and Merit'', described as formerly printed from an imperfect copy, now corrected and published intire, and as printed first in 1699. | |||
==Under Queen Anne== | |||
The declining state of Shaftesbury's health rendered it necessary for him to seek a warmer climate and in July 1711 he set out for ]. He settled at ] in November, and lived there for more than a year. His principal occupation at this time must have consisted in preparing for the press a second edition of the ''Characteristics'', which appeared in 1713, soon after his death. The copy, carefully corrected in his own handwriting, is preserved in the ]. He was also engaged, during his stay at Naples, in writing the little treatise (afterwards included in the ''Characteristics'') entitled ''A Notion of the Historical Draught or Tablature of the Judgment of Hercules'', and the letter concerning ''Design''. A little before his death he had also formed a scheme of writing a ''Discourse on the Arts of Painting, Sculpture, Etching, &c.'', but when he died he had made but little progress with it. Medals, and pictures, and antiquities, he writes to Furly, are our chief entertainments here. His conversation was with men of art and science, the virtuosi of this place. | |||
After the first few weeks of ]'s reign, Shaftesbury, who had been deprived of the vice-admiralty of ], returned to private life.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=763}} In August 1703, he again settled in the ]. At ] he lived, he says in a letter to his steward Wheelock, at the rate of less than £200 a year, and yet had much to dispose of and spend beyond convenient living.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|pp=763, 764}} | |||
Shaftesbury returned to England in August 1704, he landed at ], ] having escaped a dangerous storm during his voyage.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=Electronic Enlightenment: John Freke to John Locke|url=https://www.e-enlightenment.com/item/lockjoOU0080384b1c/|access-date=2020-12-31|website=www.e-enlightenment.com|year=2019|doi=10.13051/ee:doc/lockjoou0080384b1c}}</ref> He had symptoms of ], and gradually became an invalid. He continued to take an interest in politics, both home and foreign, and supported England's participation in the ].{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|pp=763, 764}} | |||
The events preceding the ], which he saw as paving the way for a base desertion of British allies, greatly troubled the last months of Shaftesbury's life. He did not, however, live to see the actual conclusion of the treaty (31 March 1713), as he died the month before, 4 February 1712/3. His body was brought back by sea to England and buried at ], the family seat in Dorsetshire. His only son, ], succeeded him in his titles and republished ''Characteristics'' in 1732. His great-grandson was the famous philanthropist, ]. | |||
The declining state of Shaftesbury's health rendered it necessary for him to seek a warmer climate and in July 1711 he set out for Italy. He settled at ] in November, and lived there for more than a year.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=764}} | |||
==Assessment== | |||
==Death== | |||
Shaftesbury's amiability of character seems to have been one of his principal characteristics. Like Locke he had a peculiar pleasure in bringing forward young men. Among these may be especially mentioned Michael Ainsworth, a native of Wimborne St Giles, the young man who was the recipient of the Letters addressed to a student at the university, and was maintained by Shaftesbury at ]. The interest which Shaftesbury took in his studies, and the desire that he should be specially fitted for the profession which he had selected, that of a clergyman of the Church of England, are marked features of the letters. Other protegés were Crell, a young Pole, the two young Furlys and Harry Wilkinson, a boy who was sent into Furly's office at Rotterdam, and to whom several of the letters still extant in the Record Office are addressed. | |||
Shaftesbury died at ] in the ], on 15 February 1713 (N.S.) His body was brought back to England and buried at ], the family seat in Dorset.<ref name="ODNB"/> | |||
==Associations== | |||
In the popular mind, Shaftesbury is generally regarded as a writer hostile to religion. But, however short his orthodoxy might fall if tried by the standards of any particular church, his temperament was pre-eminently religious. This fact is shown in his letters. The belief in a God, all-wise, all-just and all-merciful, governing the world providentially for the best, pervades all his works, his correspondence and his life. Nor had he any wish to undermine established beliefs, except where he conceived that they conflicted with a truer religion and a purer morality. | |||
] was an early associate, but Shaftesbury after some time found him a troublesome ally. Toland published a draft of the ''Inquiry concerning Virtue'', without permission. Shaftesbury may have exaggerated its faults, but the relationship cooled.<ref name="ODNB"/> Toland edited 14 letters from Shaftesbury to ], published in Toland in 1721.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=764}} Molesworth had been a good friend from the 1690s. Other friends among English Whigs were ], ], ], ] and ].<ref name="ODNB"/> | |||
From Locke's circle in England, Shaftesbury knew ], ] and ]. In the Netherlands in the late 1690s, he got to know Locke's contact ]. Through Furly he had introductions to become acquainted with ], ] and ]. Bayle introduced him to ].<ref name="ODNB"/> Letters from Shaftesbury to Benjamin Furly, his two sons, and his clerk Harry Wilkinson, were included in a volume entitled ''Original Letters of Locke, Sidney and Shaftesbury'', published by ] (1830, and in enlarged form, 1847). | |||
To the public ordinances of the church he scrupulously conformed. But, unfortunately, there were many things both in the teaching and the practice of the ecclesiastics of that day, which were calculated to repel men of sober judgment and high principle. These evil tendencies in the popular presentation of ] undoubtedly begot in Shaftesbury's mind a certain amount of repugnance and contempt to some of the doctrines of Christianity itself; and, cultivating, almost of set purpose, his sense of the ridiculous, he was too apt to assume towards such doctrines and their teachers a tone of raillery. | |||
Shaftesbury was a patron of Michael Ainsworth, a young Dorset man of ], maintained by Shaftesbury at ]. The ''Letters to a Young Man at the University'' (1716) were addressed to Ainsworth. Others he supported included ] and ].<ref name="ODNB"/> | |||
But, whatever might be Shaftesbury's speculative opinions or his mode of expressing them, all witnesses bear testimony to the elevation and purity of his life and aims. As an earnest student, and ardent lover of liberty, an enthusiast in the cause of virtue, and a man of unblemished life and untiring beneficence, Shaftesbury probably had no superior in his generation. His character and pursuits are the more remarkable, considering the rank of life in which he was born and the circumstances under which he was brought up. In many respects he reminds us of the imperial philosopher ], whose works he studied with avidity, and whose influence is stamped upon his own productions.<ref>Fowler, Thomas & Mitchell, John Malcolm (1911), "Shaftesbury, 3rd Earl of", in Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition (1911), vol. 24, New York: The Encyclopaedia Britannica Company, pp. 763-765</ref> | |||
== |
==Works== | ||
Most of the works for which Shaftesbury is known were completed in the period 1705 to 1710. He collected a number of those and other works in ''Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times'' (first edition 1711, anonymous, 3 vols.).<ref name="SEP">{{SEP|shaftesbury|Lord Shaftesbury |Michael B. Gill|9 September 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Shaftesbury |first1=Anthony Ashley Cooper of |title=Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times |date=1711 |publisher=s.n. |url=https://archive.org/details/characteristick11shafgoog |language=en}}</ref> His philosophical work was limited to ethics, religion, and aesthetics where he highlighted the concept of the ] as an aesthetic quality.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=764}} ] wrote " his writings, though suave and polished, lack distinction of style ".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Willey |first1=Basil |title=The English Moralists |date=1964 |publisher=Chatto & Windus |page=227 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
===Contents of the ''Characteristicks''=== | |||
Most of Shaftesbury's writings have been already mentioned. In addition to these there have been published fourteen letters from Shaftesbury to Molesworth, edited by ] in 1721; some letters to Benjamin Furly, his sons, and his clerk Harry Wilkinson, included, in a volume entitled ''Original Letters of Locke, Sidney and Shaftesbury'', which was published by T. Forster in 1830, and again in an enlarged form in 1847; three letters, written respectively to Stringer, Lord Oxford and Lord Godolphin, which appeared, for the first time, in the '']''; and lastly a letter to Le Clerc, in his recollections of Locke, first published in '']'' on 8 February 1851. The ''Letters to a Young Man at the University'' (Michael Ainsworth), already mentioned, were first published in 1716. The ''Letter on Design'' was first published in the edition of the ''Characteristics'' issued in 1732. Besides the published writings, there are several memoranda, letters, rough drafts, etc., in the Shaftesbury papers in the Record Office. | |||
This listing refers to the first edition.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Shaftesbury |first1=Anthony Ashley Cooper of |title=Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times |date=1711 |publisher=s.n. |url=https://archive.org/details/characteristick11shafgoog |language=en}}</ref> The later editions saw changes. The ''Letter on Design'' was first published in the edition of the ''Characteristicks'' issued in 1732.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=764}} | |||
;Volume I | |||
] | |||
The opening piece is ''A Letter Concerning Enthusiasm'', advocating ], published anonymously in 1708. It was based on a letter sent to ] of September 1707.<ref>Richard B. Wolf, ''The Publication of Shaftesbury's "Letter concerning Enthusiasm"'', Studies in Bibliography | |||
Vol. 32 (1979), pp. 236–241, at pp. 236–237. Published by: Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia {{JSTOR|40371706}}</ref> At this time repression of the French ]s was topical.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=764}} The second treatise is ''Sensus Communis: An Essay on the Freedom of Wit and Humour'', first published in 1709.<ref name="SEP"/><ref>{{cite book |last1=Shaftesbury |first1=Anthony Ashley Cooper of |title=Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times |date=1711 |publisher=s.n. |page= |url=https://archive.org/details/characteristick11shafgoog |language=en}}</ref> The third part is ''Soliloquy: or, Advice to an Author'', from 1710.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Shaftesbury |first1=Anthony Ashley Cooper of |title=Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times |date=1711 |publisher=s.n. |page= |url=https://archive.org/details/characteristick11shafgoog |language=en}}</ref> | |||
;Volume II | |||
Shaftesbury took great pains in the elaboration of his style, and he succeeded so far as to make his meaning transparent. The thought is always clear. But, on the other hand, he did not equally succeed in attaining elegance, an object at which he seems equally to have aimed. There is a curious affectation about his style—a falsetto note—which, notwithstanding all his efforts to please, is often irritating to the reader. Its main characteristic is perhaps best hit off by ] when he calls it genteel. He poses too much as a fine gentleman, and is so anxious not to be taken for a pedant of the vulgar scholastic kind that he falls into the hardly more attractive pedantry of the aesthete and virtuoso. But he is easily read and understood. Hence, probably, the wide popularity which his works enjoyed in the 18th century; and hence the agreeable feeling with which, notwithstanding all their false taste and their tiresome digressions, they impress the modern reader. | |||
It opens with ''Inquiry Concerning Virtue and Merit'', based on a work from 1699. With this treatise, Shaftesbury became the founder of ].<ref name="SEP"/><ref>{{SEP|entries/emotions-17th18th/LD6Shaftesbury.html|Anthony Ashley Cooper, Third Earl of Shaftesbury, on the Emotions|Amy M. Schmitter|2010}}</ref> It is accompanied by ''The Moralists, a Philosophical Rhapsody'', from 1709.<ref name="SEP"/> Shaftesbury himself regarded it as the most ambitious of his treatises.<ref>John G. Hayman, ''The Evolution of "The Moralists"'', The Modern Language Review Vol. 64, No. 4 (Oct., 1969), pp. 728–733, at p. 728. Published by: Modern Humanities Research Association {{JSTOR|3723913}}</ref> The main object of ''The Moralists'' is to propound a system of ], for ]. Shaftesbury believed in one God whose characteristic attribute is universal benevolence; in the moral government of the universe; and in a future state of man making up for the present life.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=764}} | |||
;Volume III | |||
==Philosophy== | |||
Entitled ''Miscellaneous Reflections'', this consisted of previously unpublished works.<ref name="SEP"/> From his stay at Naples there was ''A Notion of the Historical Draught or Tablature of the Judgment of Hercules''.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=764}} | |||
Shaftesbury's philosophical importance is due mainly to his ] speculations, in which his motive was primarily the refutation of Hobbes' egoistic doctrine. By the method of empirical psychology, he examined man first as a unit in himself and secondly in his wider relations to the larger units of society and the universe of mankind. His great principle was that of Harmony or Balance, and he based it on the general ground of good taste or feeling as opposed to the method of reason: | |||
#In the first place, man as an individual is a complex of appetites, passions, affections, more or less perfectly controlled by the central reason. In the moral man these factors are duly balanced. "Whoever," he says, "is in the least versed in this moral kind of architecture will find the inward fabric so adjusted, ... that the barely extending of a single passion too far or the continuance ... of it too long, is able to bring irrecoverable ruin and misery" (''Inquiry concerning Virtue or Merit'', Bk. II. ii. 1) | |||
#As a social being, man is part of a greater harmony, and, in order that he may contribute to the happiness of the whole, he must order his extra-regarding activities so that they shall not clash with his environs. Only when he has regulated his Internal and his social relations by this ideal can he be regarded as rule moral. The ] and the ] are both imperfect. In the ripe perfection of humanity, the two impulses will be perfectly adjusted. | |||
Thus, by the criterion of harmony, Shaftesbury refutes ], and deduces the virtue of benevolence as indispensable to morality. So also he has drawn a close parallel between the moral and the aesthetic criteria. Just as there is a faculty which apprehends beauty in the sphere of art, so there is in the sphere of ethics a faculty which determines the value of actions. This faculty he described (for the first time in English thought) as the Moral Sense (see ]) or Conscience (cf. ]). In its essence, it is primarily emotional and non-reflective; in process of development it becomes rationalized by education and use. The emotional and the rational elements in the moral sense Shaftesbury did not fully analyse (see ]). | |||
===Philosophical moralist=== | |||
From this principle, it follows: | |||
] | |||
#that the distinction between right and wrong is part of the constitution of human nature; | |||
Shaftesbury as a moralist opposed ]. He was a follower of the ], and like them rejected the way Hobbes collapsed moral issues into expediency.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Brett |first1=R. L. |title=The Third Earl of Shaftesbury: A Study in Eighteenth-Century Literary Theory |date=2020 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-000-03127-0 |page=290 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HSnJDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT290 |language=en}}</ref> His first published work was an anonymous ''Preface'' to the sermons of ], a prominent Cambridge Platonist, published in 1698. In it he belaboured Hobbes and his ], but also the commonplace ] arguments of Christian moralists.<ref name="ODNB"/> While Shaftesbury conformed in public to the ], his private view of some of its doctrines was less respectful.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=764}} | |||
#that morality stands apart from theology, and the moral qualities of actions are determined apart from the ]; | |||
#that the ultimate test of an action is its tendency to promote the general harmony or welfare; | |||
#that appetite and reason concur in the determination of action; | |||
#that the moralist is not concerned to solve the problems of ] and ]. | |||
From these results we see that Shaftesbury, opposed to ] and Locke, is in close agreement with Hutcheson, and that he is ultimately a deeply religious thinker, inasmuch as he discards the moral sanction of public opinion, the ], and the ] as the main incentives to goodness, and substitutes the voice of conscience and the love of God. These two alone move men to aim at perfect harmony for its own sake in the man and in the universe. | |||
His starting point in the ''Characteristicks'', however, was indeed such a form of ] as was common ground for Hobbes, ] and ]: appeal to self-interest. He divided moralists into ] and ], identifying with the Stoics and their attention to the ]. It made him concentrate on ]. He took Spinoza and ] as the leading Epicureans of his time (in unpublished writings).<ref>{{cite book |last=Israel |first=Jonathan I. |author-link=Jonathan Israel |title=Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750 |date=2002 |publisher=OUP Oxford |isbn=9780191622878 |pages=625–626 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
Shaftesbury's philosophical activity was confined to ethics, religion, and aesthetics where he was one of the earliest writers to bring into prominence the concept of the ] as an aesthetic quality. For metaphysics, properly so called, and even psychology, except so far as it afforded a basis for ethics, he evidently had no taste. Logic he probably despised as merely an instrument of pedantic judgment for which, in his day, and especially at the universities, there was only too much ground. | |||
Shaftesbury examined man first as a unit in himself, and secondly socially. His major principle was harmony or balance, rather than ]. In man, he wrote, | |||
The main object of the ]s is to propound a system of natural theology, and to vindicate, so far as natural religion is concerned, the ways of God to man. The articles of Shaftesbury's religious creed were few and simple, but these he entertained with a conviction amounting to enthusiasm. They may briefly be summed up as a belief in one God whose most characteristic attribute is universal benevolence, in the moral government of the universe, and in a future state of man making up for the imperfections and repairing the inequalities of the present life. Shaftesbury is emphatically an optimist, but there is a passage in the Moralists (pt. ii. sect. 4) which would lead us to suppose that he regarded matter as an indifferent principle, coexistent and coeternal with God, limiting His operations, and the ] and imperfection which, notwithstanding the benevolence of the Creator, is still to be found in His work. If this view of his optimism be correct, Shaftesbury, as Mill says of ], must be regarded as maintaining, not that this is the best of all imaginable but only of all possible worlds. This brief notice of Shaftesbury's scheme of natural religion would be conspicuously imperfect unless it were added that it is popularized in ]'s ''Essay on Man'', several lines of which, especially of the first epistle, are simply statements from the Moralists done into verse. Whether, however, these were taken immediately by Pope from Shaftesbury, or whether they came to him through the papers which ] had prepared for his use, we have no means of determining. On the other hand, Pope had certainly read Shaftesbury's work, for he mentions the character of Theocles in the latter's ''The Moralists'' in his ''Dunciad'' (IV.487-490): "Or that bright Image to our Fancy draw,/Which Theocles in raptur'd vision saw,/While thro' Poetic scenes the Genius roves,/Or wanders wild in Academic Groves". In his notes to these lines, Pope directs the reader to various passages in Shaftesbury's work. | |||
<blockquote>"Whoever is in the least versed in this moral kind of architecture will find the inward fabric so adjusted, that the barely extending of a single passion too far or the continuance of it too long, is able to bring irrecoverable ruin and misery".<ref>{{harvnb|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=765}} Cites: ''Inquiry concerning Virtue or Merit'', Bk. II. ii. 1.</ref></blockquote> | |||
==Reception== | |||
This version of a ] doctrine that goes back to ] was savaged by Mandeville, who slurred it as associated with a sheltered and comfortable life, Catholic ], and modern sentimental rusticity.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Sambrook |first1=James |title=The Eighteenth Century: The Intellectual and Cultural Context of English Literature 1700–1789 |date=2014 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-89324-0 |page=70 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ANUFBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA70 |language=en}}</ref> On the other hand, ] adopted Shaftesbury's view that "all excellency is harmony, symmetry or proportion".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bombaro |first1=John J. |title=Jonathan Edwards's Vision of Reality: The Relationship of God to the World, Redemption History, and the Reprobate |date=2011 |publisher=Wipf and Stock Publishers |isbn=978-1-63087-812-2 |page=59 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oB_1BgAAQBAJ&pg=PA59 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
The influence of Shaftesbury's writings was considerable both at home and abroad. His ethical system was reproduced, though in a more precise and philosophical form, by Hutcheson, and from him descended, with certain variations, to ]<ref>In his Introduction to his "A Treatise on Human Nature", Hume mentions Shaftesbury among other philosophers who "who have begun to put the science of man on a new footing, and have engaged the attention, and excited the curiosity of the public"</ref> and ]. Nor was it without its effect even on the speculations of Butler. Of the so-called ] Shaftesbury was probably the most important, as he was certainly the most plausible and the most respectable. No sooner had the ''Characteristics'' appeared than they were welcomed, in terms of warm commendation, by Le Clerc and ]. | |||
On man as a social creature, Shaftesbury argued that the egoist and the extreme ] are both imperfect. People, to contribute to the happiness of the whole, must fit in.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=765}} He rejected the idea that humankind is naturally selfish; and the idea that altruism necessarily cuts across self-interest.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Shaftesbury |first1=Anthony Ashley Cooper Earl of |title=An Inquiry Concerning Virtue, Or Merit |date=1977 |publisher=Manchester University Press |isbn=978-0-7190-0657-9 |page=xv |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=J9NRAQAAIAAJ&pg=PR15 |language=en}}</ref> ] found this general and social approach attractive.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Vicchio |first1=Stephen J. |title=Jefferson's Religion |date=2007 |publisher=Wipf and Stock Publishers |isbn=978-1-59752-830-6 |page=60 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=e7FLAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA60 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
In 1745 ] adapted or reproduced the ''Inquiry concerning Virtue'' in what was afterwards known as his ''Essai sur le Mérite et la Vertu''. In 1769 a French translation of the whole of Shaftesbury's works, including the ''Letters'', was published at Geneva. Translations of separate treatises into German began to be made in 1738, and in 1776-1779 there appeared a complete ] translation of the ''Characteristics''. ] says that not only Leibniz, ] and Diderot, but ], ], Wieland and ], drew the most stimulating nutriment from Shaftesbury. His charms, he adds, are ever fresh. A new-born Hellenism, or divine coitus of beauty presented itself before his inspired soul. | |||
This move relied on a close parallel between moral and aesthetic criteria. In the English tradition, this appeal to a ] was innovative. Primarily emotional and non-reflective, it becomes rationalised by education and use. Corollaries are that morality stands apart from theology, and the moral qualities of actions are determined apart from the ]; and that the moralist is not concerned to solve the problems of ] and ]. Shaftesbury in this way opposed also what is to be found in Locke.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=765}} | |||
Herder is especially eulogistic. In the ''Adrastea'' he pronounces the ''Moralists'' to be a composition in form well-nigh worthy of Grecian antiquity, and in its contents almost superior to it. The interest felt by German literary men in Shaftesbury was revived by the publication of two excellent monographs, one dealing with him mainly from the theological side by ] (Freiburg in Baden, 1872), the other dealing with him mainly from the philosophical side by ] (Leipzig, 1876). | |||
== |
===Reception=== | ||
The conceptual framework used by Shaftesbury was representative of much thinking in the ], and remained popular until the 1770s.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Chisick |first1=Harvey |title=Historical Dictionary of the Enlightenment |date=2005 |publisher=Scarecrow Press |isbn=978-0-8108-6548-8 |page=385 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2oV8xAMgFckC&pg=PA385 |language=en}}</ref> When the ''Characteristicks'' appeared they were welcomed by Le Clerc and ]. Among the English ] Shaftesbury was significant, plausible and the most respectable.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=765}} | |||
{{1911}} | |||
====By the Augustans==== | |||
The most recent and definitive biography available of the 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury is Robert B. Voitle's "The third Earl of Shaftesbury, 1671-1713" Baton Rouge : Louisiana State University Press, c1984. | |||
In terms of ], Shaftesbury's defence of ] was taken as an entitlement to scoff, and to use ridicule as a "test of truth". Clerical authors operated on the assumption that he was a ].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bullard |first1=Paddy |title=The Oxford Handbook of Eighteenth-Century Satire |date=2019 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-872783-5 |page=578 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3dShDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA578 |language=en}}</ref> ], reading ''Characteristicks'' in 1748 without realising Shaftesbury had been marked down as a ], was both impressed and sometimes shocked. Around this time ] and ] stepped up a campaign against deist influence, tarnishing Shaftesbury's reputation.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Fiering |first1=Norman |title=Jonathan Edwards's Moral Thought and Its British Context |date=2006 |publisher=Wipf and Stock Publishers |isbn=978-1-59752-618-0 |page=109 note8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dJZLAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA109 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
While Shaftesbury wrote on ridicule in the 1712 edition of ''Characteristicks'', the modern scholarly consensus is that the uses of his views on it as a "test of truth" were a stretch.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Amir |first1=Lydia B. |title=Humor and the Good Life in Modern Philosophy: Shaftesbury, Hamann, Kierkegaard |date=2014 |publisher=SUNY Press |isbn=978-1-4384-4938-8 |page=41 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SjaoAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA41 |language=en}}</ref> According to ], the "test of truth" phrase is not to be found in ''Characteristicks''; it was imposed on the Augustan debate by ].<ref>Alfred Owen Aldridge, ''Shaftesbury and the Test of Truth'', PMLA Vol. 60, No. 1 (Mar., 1945), pp. 129–156, at p. 129. Published by: Modern Language Association {{JSTOR|459126}}</ref> | |||
In ]'s monograph on Shaftesbury and Hutcheson in the series of English philosophers (1882) he was able to supplement the printed materials for the Life by extracts from the Shaftesbury papers in the Record Office. These include, besides many letters and memoranda, two Lives of him, composed by his son, the fourth earl, one of which is evidently the original, though it is by no means always closely followed, of the Life contributed by ] to the ''General Dictionary''. | |||
The influence of Shaftesbury, and in particular ''The Moralists'', on '']'', was claimed in the 18th century by ] (in his philosophical letter "On Pope"),<ref></ref> ] and ], and supported in recent times, for example by ]. ] did not mention Shaftesbury explicitly as a source: this omission has been understood in terms of the political divide, Pope being a Tory.<ref>William E. Alderman, ''Pope's "Essay on Man" and Shaftesbury's "The Moralists"'', The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America Vol. 67, No. 2 (Second Quarter, 1973), pp. 131–140. Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the Bibliographical Society of America {{JSTOR|24301749}}</ref> Pope references the character Theocles from ''The Moralists'' in the '']'' (IV.487–490): | |||
For description and criticism of Shaftesbury's philosophy: | |||
<poem>"Or that bright Image to our Fancy draw, | |||
*], ''Progress of Ethical Philosophy'' | |||
Which Theocles in raptur'd vision saw, | |||
*], ''History of Moral Philosophy in England'' | |||
While thro' Poetic scenes the Genius roves, | |||
*], ''Introduction to Ethics'' (Channing's translation) | |||
Or wanders wild in Academic Groves".</poem> | |||
*], ''English Thought in the Eighteenth Century'' | |||
*], ''Types of Ethical Theory'' | |||
*],'s history of Philosophy (Eng. trans., 1893) | |||
*], ''The English Moralists'' (1964) | |||
*]'s unfinished edition with appendices of the ''Characteristics'' (1870) | |||
*]'s edition of the ''Characteristics'' (1900) | |||
*] (1900) ''The Life, Unpublished Letters and Philosophical Regimen of Anthony, Earl of Shaftesbury'' | |||
*Cooper, Anthony Ashley, Earl of Shaftesbury, ''An Inquiry Concerning Virtue'', London, 1699. Facsimile ed., introd. Joseph Filonowicz, 1991, Scholars' Facsimiles & Reprints, ISBN 9780820114552. | |||
*David Walford's edition of "An Inquiry Concerning Virtue or Merit." A selection of material from Toland's 1699 edition and an interesting introduction by the editor. | |||
In notes to these lines, Pope directed the reader to various passages in Shaftesbury's work.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=765}} | |||
For his relations to the religious, art and theological controversies of his day, see: | |||
====In moral philosophy and its literary reflection==== | |||
*], ''View of the Principal Deistical Writers'' | |||
Shaftesbury's ethical system was rationalised by ], and from him passed with modifications to ]; these writers, however, changed from reliance on moral sense to the ] of moral obligation.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Darwall |first1=Stephen |last2=Stephen |first2=Darwall |title=The British Moralists and the Internal 'Ought': 1640–1740 |date=1995 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-45782-8 |page=219 and note 25 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=V0MRre56HAUC&pg=PA219 |language=en}}</ref> From there it was taken up by ], who elaborated a theory of ] with some restricted emotional input, and a complex apparatus taking context into account.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Haakonssen |first1=Knud |title=Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment |date=1996 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-49802-9 |pages=231–232 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=luwipM3Mg-oC&pg=PA231 |language=en}}</ref> ] adopted the system, but not ruling out the place of "]", a rationalist version of the affective moral sense.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Skorupski |first1=John |title=The Routledge Companion to Ethics |date=2010 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-96422-0 |page=114 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hJhaBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA114 |language=en}}</ref> ], the American educator, did not accept Shaftesbury's moral sense as a given, but believed it might be available by intermittent divine intervention.<ref>Joseph J. Ellis III, ''The Philosophy of Samuel Johnson'', The William and Mary Quarterly Vol. 28, No. 1 (Jan., 1971), pp. 26–45, at p. 44. Published by: Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture {{JSTOR|1925118}}</ref> | |||
*], ''Geschichte des Englischen Deismus'' | |||
*] (1870-3), ''Religious Thought in England, from the Reformation to the end of last century'' | |||
In the English ] of the 18th century, arguments from the Shaftesbury–Hutcheson tradition appear. An early example in ]'s ''Felicia to Charlotte'' (vol.1, 1744) comes from its hero Lucius, who reasons in line with ''An Enquiry Concerning Virtue and Merit'' on the "moral sense".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Staves |first1=Susan |title=A Literary History of Women's Writing in Britain, 1660–1789 |date=2006 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-139-45858-0 |pages=237–238 |language=en}}</ref> The second volume (1749) has discussions of ] material, and makes use of the ''Philemon to Hydaspes'' (1737) of ], described by Aldridge as "filled with favorable references to Shaftesbury."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Staves |first1=Susan |title=A Literary History of Women's Writing in Britain, 1660–1789 |date=2006 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-139-45858-0 |page=240 |language=en}}</ref><ref>Alfred Owen Aldridge, ''Shaftesbury and the Deist Manifesto'', Transactions of the American Philosophical Society Vol. 41, No. 2 (1951), pp. 297–382, at p. 376. Published by: American Philosophical Society. {{JSTOR|1005651}}</ref> The eponymous hero of '']'' (1753) by ] has been described as embodying the "Shaftesburian model" of ]: he is "stoic, rational, in control, yet sympathetic towards others, particularly those less fortunate."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Sabor |first1=Peter |last2=Schellenberg |first2=Betty A. |title=Samuel Richardson in Context |date=2017 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-32716-9 |page=252 |language=en}}</ref> '']'' (1768) by ] was intended by its author to evoke the "sympathizing principle" on which the tradition founded by ]s, Cambridge Platonists and Shaftesbury relied.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ross |first1=Ian Campbell |title=Laurence Sterne: A Life |date=2001 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-212235-3 |page=418 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
*] (2000), ''George Berkeley's Grand Tours: The Immaterialist as Connoisseur of Art and Architecture'', in E. Chaney, The Evolution of the Grand Tour: Anglo-Italian Cultural Relations since the Renaissance, 2nd ed. London, Routledge | |||
*] and ], ''The English Church in the Eighteenth Century'' | |||
====Across Europe==== | |||
*] (1863), ''Critical History of Free Thought in Reference to the Christian Religion'' (Bampton Lectures 1862 ) | |||
In 1745 ] adapted or reproduced the ''Inquiry concerning Virtue'' in what was afterwards known as his ''Essai sur le Mérite et la Vertu''. In 1769 a French translation of the whole of Shaftesbury's works, including the ''Letters'', was published at Geneva.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=765}} | |||
*], ''Einfluss der englischen Philosophen seit Bacon auf die deutsche Philosophie des 18ten Jahrhunderts'' (Berlin, 1881). | |||
Translations of separate treatises into German began to be made in 1738, and in 1776–1779 there appeared a complete German translation of the ''Characteristicks''. ] stated that not only Leibniz, ] and Diderot, but ], ], ] and ], drew from Shaftesbury.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=765}} | |||
Herder in early work took from Shaftesbury arguments for respecting individuality, and against system and universal psychology. He went on to praise him in ''Adrastea''.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Gjesdal |first1=Kristin |title=Herder's Hermeneutics: History, Poetry, Enlightenment |date=2017 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-11286-5 |page=112 and note 27 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ts8oDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA112 |language=en}}</ref> ] found in Shaftesbury the "inward form" concept, key for education in the approach of ].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Palmer |first1=Joy |last2=Bresler |first2=Liora |last3=Cooper |first3=David |title=Fifty Major Thinkers on Education: From Confucius to Dewey |date=2002 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-134-73594-5 |page=81 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fFLhvQau0xkC&pg=PA81 |language=en}}</ref> Later philosophical writers in German (] with ''Die Philosophie des Grafen von Shaftesbury'', 1872, and ] with ''Die Philosophie Shaftesbury's'', 1876) returned to Shaftesbury in books.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Erdmann |first1=Johann Eduard |title=A History of Philosophy |date=2004 |publisher=Psychology Press |isbn=978-0-415-29542-0 |page=123 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XafXMVMb2vQC&pg=PA123 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
==Legacy== | |||
] | |||
At the beginning of the 18th century, Shaftesbury built a ] on the Shaftesbury Estate, known as the Philosopher's Tower. It sits in a field, visible from the B3078 just south of ]. | |||
In the Shaftesbury papers that went to the ] are several memoranda, letters, rough drafts, etc.{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=764}} | |||
A portrait of the 3rd Earl is displayed in ].<ref>{{cite web|url= https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/anthony-ashley-cooper-16711713-3rd-earl-of-shaftesbury-60319/search/venue:shaftesbury-town-hall-3515/page/1/view_as/grid |title= Anthony Ashley-Cooper (1671–1713), 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury |publisher=Art UK| access-date=18 December 2020}}</ref> | |||
==Family== | |||
Shaftesbury married in 1709 Jane Ewer, the daughter of Thomas Ewer of ], ]. On 9 February 1711, their only child Anthony, the future ] was born.<ref name="ODNB"/> | |||
His son succeeded him in his titles and republished ''Characteristicks'' in 1732. His great-grandson was the famous philanthropist, ].{{sfn|Fowler|Mitchell|1911|p=764}} | |||
==Publications of Shaftesbury== | |||
The following list of Shaftebury's principal publications has been sourced from ''The third Earl of Shaftesbury, 1671–1713'' by Robert Voitle.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Voitle |first=Robert |url=https://archive.org/details/thirdearlofshaft0000voit/page/417/mode/1up |title=The third Earl of Shaftesbury, 1671–1713 |publisher=Louisiana State University Press |year=1984 |isbn=0807111392 |location=Baton Rouge |pages=417–418}}</ref> | |||
*''The Danger of Mercenary Parliaments''. 1698. With the collaboration of John Toland. | |||
*''Select Sermons of Dr. Whichcot''. London, 1698. Preface by Shaftesbury. | |||
*''An Inquiry Concerning Virtue, in Two Discourses''. London, 1699. | |||
*''The Adept Ladys or The Angelick Sect. Being the Matters of fact of certain Adventures Spiritual, Philosophical, Political, and Gallant. In a Letter to a Brother.'' 1702. | |||
*''Paradoxes of State, Relating to the Present Juncture of Affairs in England and the rest of Europe; Chiefly grounded on his Majesty's Princely, Pious, and most Gracious Speech''. London, 1702. With the collaboration of John Toland. | |||
*''The Sociable Enthusiast. A Philosophical Adventure Written to Palemon''. | |||
*''A Letter Concerning Enthusiasm, To My Lord *****.'' London, 1708. | |||
*''The Moralists, a Philosophical Rhapsody. Being a recital of certain conversations upon natural and moral subjects''. London, 1709. | |||
*''Sensus Communis: An Essay on the Freedom of Wit and Humour. In a letter to a friend''. London, 1709. | |||
*''Soliloquy: or, Advice to an Author''. London, 1710. | |||
*''AΣKHMATA'' [”Exercises”). Written from 1698 to 1712. Edited by Benjamin Rand in 1900 in ''The Life, Unpublished Letters, and Philosophical Regimen of Anthony, Earl of Shaftesbury''. | |||
*''Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times.'' 3 vols. London, 1711. | |||
*''Second Characters, or the Language of Forms''. Largely written in 1712. | |||
*''A Letter Concerning the Art or Science of Design, written from Italy'' (''on the occasion of Some Designs in Painting), to my Lord *****''. | |||
*''A Notion of the Historical Draught or Tablature of the Judgment of Hercules''. 1713. | |||
*''Plasticks, or the Original Progress and Power of Designatory Art''. | |||
*''Several Letters Written by a Noble Lord to a Young Man at the University''. London, 1716. | |||
*''Letters from the Right Honourable the late Earl of Shaftesbury, to Robert Molesworth, Esq. . . . with two letters written by the late Sir John Cropley''. Ed. with an introduction by John Toland. London, 1721. | |||
*''Letters of the Earl of Shaftesbury''. Collected into one volume, London, 1750. | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
;Attribution | |||
* {{EB1911|last=Fowler |first=Thomas |author-link= Thomas Fowler (academic)|last2=Mitchell |first2=John Malcolm |wstitle=Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, 3rd Earl of |volume=24 |pages=763–765}} | |||
==Further reading== | |||
* Cooper, Anthony Ashley, Earl of Shaftesbury, ''An Inquiry Concerning Virtue'', London, 1699. Facsimile ed., introd. Joseph Filonowicz, 1991, Scholars' Facsimiles & Reprints, {{ISBN|978-0-8201-1455-2}}. | |||
* David Walford (editor). ''An Inquiry Concerning Virtue or Merit.'' A selection of material from Toland's 1699 edition with introduction. | |||
* Robert B. Voitle, ''The third Earl of Shaftesbury, 1671–1713'', Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, c. 1984. | |||
* ] (2000), ''George Berkeley's Grand Tours: The Immaterialist as Connoisseur of Art and Architecture'', in E. Chaney, The Evolution of the Grand Tour: Anglo-Italian Cultural Relations since the Renaissance, 2nd ed. London, Routledge | |||
* {{Cite web |title=ASHLEY, Anthony, Lord Ashley (1671–1713), of Wimborne St. Giles, Dorset |first=Paula |last=Watson | author-first2=Henry |author-last2=Lancaster |url=http://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1690-1715/member/ashley-anthony-1671-1713 |website=History of Parliament Online |access-date=18 January 2023}} | |||
* {{cite encyclopedia |last= Smith |first=George H. |author-link= George H. Smith |editor-first=Ronald |editor-last=Hamowy |editor-link=Ronald Hamowy |encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism |title= Shaftesbury, Third Earl of (1671–1713) |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC |year=2008 |publisher= ]; ] |location= Thousand Oaks, CA |doi=10.4135/9781412965811.n282 |isbn= 978-1412965804 |oclc=750831024| lccn = 2008009151 |page=462 }} | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
{{wikisource author |
* {{wikisource author-inline}} | ||
{{wikiquote}} | * {{wikiquote-inline}} | ||
* | * | ||
* | |||
* | |||
* , an article by John McAteer in ] 2011 | |||
* | |||
{{s-start}} | {{s-start}} | ||
{{s-par|en}} | {{s-par|en}} | ||
{{succession box | before=]<br />] | title= |
{{succession box | before=]<br />] | title=Member of Parliament for ]<br /><small>with ]</small> | years=1695–1698 | after=]<br />]}} | ||
{{s-reg|en}} | {{s-reg|en}} | ||
{{s-bef|before=]}} | {{s-bef|before=]}} | ||
{{s-ttl|title=]|years= |
{{s-ttl|title=]|years=1699–1713}} | ||
{{s-aft|after=]}} | {{s-aft|after=]}} | ||
{{end}} | {{s-end}} | ||
{{Portalbar|Books|Economics|England|Liberalism|Libertarianism|Philosophy|Politics}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2011}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{Persondata | |||
|name= Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, 3rd Earl of | |||
|alternative names= | |||
|short description= | |||
|date of birth=26 February 1671 | |||
|place of birth= | |||
|date of death=4 February 1713 | |||
|place of death= | |||
}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, 3rd Earl Of}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, 3rd Earl Of}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 21:57, 26 December 2024
English politician, philosopher and writer (1671–1713)You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in German. (January 2022) Click for important translation instructions.
|
The Right HonourableThe Earl of Shaftesbury | |
---|---|
Born | (1671-02-26)26 February 1671 London, England |
Died | 16 February 1713(1713-02-16) (aged 41–42) Chiaia, Naples |
Era | 18th-century philosophy Early modern philosophy |
Region | Western philosophy |
School | Cambridge Platonism |
Anthony Ashley Cooper, 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury (26 February 1671 – 16 February 1713) was an English peer, Whig politician, philosopher and writer.
Early life
He was born at Exeter House in London, the son and first child of the future Anthony Ashley Cooper, 2nd Earl of Shaftesbury and his wife Lady Dorothy Manners, daughter of John Manners, 8th Earl of Rutland.
Letters sent to his parents reveal emotional manipulation attempted by his mother in refusing to see her son unless he cut off all ties to his sickly and secluded father. At the age of three Ashley-Cooper was made over to the formal guardianship of his grandfather Anthony Ashley Cooper, 1st Earl of Shaftesbury. John Locke, as medical attendant to the Ashley household, was entrusted with the supervision of his education. It was conducted according to the principles of Locke's Some Thoughts Concerning Education (1693), and the method of teaching Latin and Greek conversationally was pursued by his instructress, Elizabeth Birch. At the age of eleven, it is said, Ashley could read both languages with ease. Birch had moved to Clapham and Ashley spent some years there with her.
In 1683, after the death of the first Earl, his father sent Lord Ashley, as he now was by courtesy, to Winchester College. Under a Scottish tutor, Daniel Denoune, he began a continental tour with two older companions, Sir John Cropley, 2nd Baronet, and Thomas Sclater Bacon.
Under William and Mary
After the Glorious Revolution, Lord Ashley returned to England in 1689. It took five years, but he entered public life, as a parliamentary candidate for the borough of Poole, and was returned on 21 May 1695. He spoke for the Bill for Regulating Trials in Cases of Treason, one provision of which was that a person indicted for treason or misprision of treason should be allowed the assistance of counsel.
Although a Whig, Ashley was not partisan. His poor health forced him to retire from parliament at the dissolution of July 1698. He suffered from asthma. The following year, to escape the London environment, he purchased a property in Little Chelsea, adding a 50-foot extension to the existing building to house his bedchamber and Library, and planting fruit trees and vines. He sold the property to Narcissus Luttrell in 1710.
He was Lord Proprietor of the English colony of Carolina in North America and the Bahamas during this time.
Lord Ashley moved to the Netherlands. Away for over a year, Ashley returned to England, and shortly succeeded his father as Earl of Shaftesbury. He took an active part, on the Whig side in the House of Lords, in the January 1701 English general election, and again, with more success, in the November 1701 English general election.
Under Queen Anne
After the first few weeks of Anne's reign, Shaftesbury, who had been deprived of the vice-admiralty of Dorset, returned to private life. In August 1703, he again settled in the Netherlands. At Rotterdam he lived, he says in a letter to his steward Wheelock, at the rate of less than £200 a year, and yet had much to dispose of and spend beyond convenient living.
Shaftesbury returned to England in August 1704, he landed at Aldeburgh, Suffolk having escaped a dangerous storm during his voyage. He had symptoms of consumption, and gradually became an invalid. He continued to take an interest in politics, both home and foreign, and supported England's participation in the War of the Spanish Succession.
The declining state of Shaftesbury's health rendered it necessary for him to seek a warmer climate and in July 1711 he set out for Italy. He settled at Naples in November, and lived there for more than a year.
Death
Shaftesbury died at Chiaia in the Kingdom of Naples, on 15 February 1713 (N.S.) His body was brought back to England and buried at Wimborne St Giles, the family seat in Dorset.
Associations
John Toland was an early associate, but Shaftesbury after some time found him a troublesome ally. Toland published a draft of the Inquiry concerning Virtue, without permission. Shaftesbury may have exaggerated its faults, but the relationship cooled. Toland edited 14 letters from Shaftesbury to Robert Molesworth, published in Toland in 1721. Molesworth had been a good friend from the 1690s. Other friends among English Whigs were Charles Davenant, Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, Walter Moyle, William Stephens and John Trenchard.
From Locke's circle in England, Shaftesbury knew Edward Clarke, Damaris Masham and Walter Yonge. In the Netherlands in the late 1690s, he got to know Locke's contact Benjamin Furly. Through Furly he had introductions to become acquainted with Pierre Bayle, Jean Leclerc and Philipp van Limborch. Bayle introduced him to Pierre Des Maizeaux. Letters from Shaftesbury to Benjamin Furly, his two sons, and his clerk Harry Wilkinson, were included in a volume entitled Original Letters of Locke, Sidney and Shaftesbury, published by Thomas Ignatius Maria Forster (1830, and in enlarged form, 1847).
Shaftesbury was a patron of Michael Ainsworth, a young Dorset man of Wimborne St Giles, maintained by Shaftesbury at University College, Oxford. The Letters to a Young Man at the University (1716) were addressed to Ainsworth. Others he supported included Pierre Coste and Paul Crellius.
Works
Most of the works for which Shaftesbury is known were completed in the period 1705 to 1710. He collected a number of those and other works in Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times (first edition 1711, anonymous, 3 vols.). His philosophical work was limited to ethics, religion, and aesthetics where he highlighted the concept of the sublime as an aesthetic quality. Basil Willey wrote " his writings, though suave and polished, lack distinction of style ".
Contents of the Characteristicks
This listing refers to the first edition. The later editions saw changes. The Letter on Design was first published in the edition of the Characteristicks issued in 1732.
- Volume I
The opening piece is A Letter Concerning Enthusiasm, advocating religious toleration, published anonymously in 1708. It was based on a letter sent to John Somers, 1st Baron Somers of September 1707. At this time repression of the French Camisards was topical. The second treatise is Sensus Communis: An Essay on the Freedom of Wit and Humour, first published in 1709. The third part is Soliloquy: or, Advice to an Author, from 1710.
- Volume II
It opens with Inquiry Concerning Virtue and Merit, based on a work from 1699. With this treatise, Shaftesbury became the founder of moral sense theory. It is accompanied by The Moralists, a Philosophical Rhapsody, from 1709. Shaftesbury himself regarded it as the most ambitious of his treatises. The main object of The Moralists is to propound a system of natural theology, for theodicy. Shaftesbury believed in one God whose characteristic attribute is universal benevolence; in the moral government of the universe; and in a future state of man making up for the present life.
- Volume III
Entitled Miscellaneous Reflections, this consisted of previously unpublished works. From his stay at Naples there was A Notion of the Historical Draught or Tablature of the Judgment of Hercules.
Philosophical moralist
Shaftesbury as a moralist opposed Thomas Hobbes. He was a follower of the Cambridge Platonists, and like them rejected the way Hobbes collapsed moral issues into expediency. His first published work was an anonymous Preface to the sermons of Benjamin Whichcote, a prominent Cambridge Platonist, published in 1698. In it he belaboured Hobbes and his ethical egoism, but also the commonplace carrot and stick arguments of Christian moralists. While Shaftesbury conformed in public to the Church of England, his private view of some of its doctrines was less respectful.
His starting point in the Characteristicks, however, was indeed such a form of ethical naturalism as was common ground for Hobbes, Bernard Mandeville and Spinoza: appeal to self-interest. He divided moralists into Stoics and Epicurean, identifying with the Stoics and their attention to the common good. It made him concentrate on virtue. He took Spinoza and Descartes as the leading Epicureans of his time (in unpublished writings).
Shaftesbury examined man first as a unit in himself, and secondly socially. His major principle was harmony or balance, rather than rationalism. In man, he wrote,
"Whoever is in the least versed in this moral kind of architecture will find the inward fabric so adjusted, that the barely extending of a single passion too far or the continuance of it too long, is able to bring irrecoverable ruin and misery".
This version of a golden mean doctrine that goes back to Aristotle was savaged by Mandeville, who slurred it as associated with a sheltered and comfortable life, Catholic asceticism, and modern sentimental rusticity. On the other hand, Jonathan Edwards adopted Shaftesbury's view that "all excellency is harmony, symmetry or proportion".
On man as a social creature, Shaftesbury argued that the egoist and the extreme altruist are both imperfect. People, to contribute to the happiness of the whole, must fit in. He rejected the idea that humankind is naturally selfish; and the idea that altruism necessarily cuts across self-interest. Thomas Jefferson found this general and social approach attractive.
This move relied on a close parallel between moral and aesthetic criteria. In the English tradition, this appeal to a moral sense was innovative. Primarily emotional and non-reflective, it becomes rationalised by education and use. Corollaries are that morality stands apart from theology, and the moral qualities of actions are determined apart from the will of God; and that the moralist is not concerned to solve the problems of free will and determinism. Shaftesbury in this way opposed also what is to be found in Locke.
Reception
The conceptual framework used by Shaftesbury was representative of much thinking in the early Enlightenment, and remained popular until the 1770s. When the Characteristicks appeared they were welcomed by Le Clerc and Gottfried Leibniz. Among the English deists Shaftesbury was significant, plausible and the most respectable.
By the Augustans
In terms of Augustan literature, Shaftesbury's defence of ridicule was taken as an entitlement to scoff, and to use ridicule as a "test of truth". Clerical authors operated on the assumption that he was a freethinker. Ezra Stiles, reading Characteristicks in 1748 without realising Shaftesbury had been marked down as a deist, was both impressed and sometimes shocked. Around this time John Leland and Philip Skelton stepped up a campaign against deist influence, tarnishing Shaftesbury's reputation.
While Shaftesbury wrote on ridicule in the 1712 edition of Characteristicks, the modern scholarly consensus is that the uses of his views on it as a "test of truth" were a stretch. According to Alfred Owen Aldridge, the "test of truth" phrase is not to be found in Characteristicks; it was imposed on the Augustan debate by George Berkeley.
The influence of Shaftesbury, and in particular The Moralists, on An Essay on Man, was claimed in the 18th century by Voltaire (in his philosophical letter "On Pope"), Lord Hervey and Thomas Warton, and supported in recent times, for example by Maynard Mack. Alexander Pope did not mention Shaftesbury explicitly as a source: this omission has been understood in terms of the political divide, Pope being a Tory. Pope references the character Theocles from The Moralists in the Dunciad (IV.487–490):
"Or that bright Image to our Fancy draw,
Which Theocles in raptur'd vision saw,
While thro' Poetic scenes the Genius roves,
Or wanders wild in Academic Groves".
In notes to these lines, Pope directed the reader to various passages in Shaftesbury's work.
In moral philosophy and its literary reflection
Shaftesbury's ethical system was rationalised by Francis Hutcheson, and from him passed with modifications to David Hume; these writers, however, changed from reliance on moral sense to the deontological ethics of moral obligation. From there it was taken up by Adam Smith, who elaborated a theory of moral judgement with some restricted emotional input, and a complex apparatus taking context into account. Joseph Butler adopted the system, but not ruling out the place of "moral reason", a rationalist version of the affective moral sense. Samuel Johnson, the American educator, did not accept Shaftesbury's moral sense as a given, but believed it might be available by intermittent divine intervention.
In the English sentimental novel of the 18th century, arguments from the Shaftesbury–Hutcheson tradition appear. An early example in Mary Collyer's Felicia to Charlotte (vol.1, 1744) comes from its hero Lucius, who reasons in line with An Enquiry Concerning Virtue and Merit on the "moral sense". The second volume (1749) has discussions of conduct book material, and makes use of the Philemon to Hydaspes (1737) of Henry Coventry, described by Aldridge as "filled with favorable references to Shaftesbury." The eponymous hero of The History of Sir Charles Grandison (1753) by Samuel Richardson has been described as embodying the "Shaftesburian model" of masculinity: he is "stoic, rational, in control, yet sympathetic towards others, particularly those less fortunate." A Sentimental Journey Through France and Italy (1768) by Laurence Sterne was intended by its author to evoke the "sympathizing principle" on which the tradition founded by latitudinarians, Cambridge Platonists and Shaftesbury relied.
Across Europe
In 1745 Denis Diderot adapted or reproduced the Inquiry concerning Virtue in what was afterwards known as his Essai sur le Mérite et la Vertu. In 1769 a French translation of the whole of Shaftesbury's works, including the Letters, was published at Geneva.
Translations of separate treatises into German began to be made in 1738, and in 1776–1779 there appeared a complete German translation of the Characteristicks. Hermann Theodor Hettner stated that not only Leibniz, Voltaire and Diderot, but Gotthold Ephraim Lessing, Moses Mendelssohn, Christoph Martin Wieland and Johann Gottfried von Herder, drew from Shaftesbury.
Herder in early work took from Shaftesbury arguments for respecting individuality, and against system and universal psychology. He went on to praise him in Adrastea. Wilhelm von Humboldt found in Shaftesbury the "inward form" concept, key for education in the approach of German classical philosophy. Later philosophical writers in German (Gideon Spicker with Die Philosophie des Grafen von Shaftesbury, 1872, and Georg von Gizycki with Die Philosophie Shaftesbury's, 1876) returned to Shaftesbury in books.
Legacy
At the beginning of the 18th century, Shaftesbury built a folly on the Shaftesbury Estate, known as the Philosopher's Tower. It sits in a field, visible from the B3078 just south of Cranborne.
In the Shaftesbury papers that went to the Public Record Office are several memoranda, letters, rough drafts, etc.
A portrait of the 3rd Earl is displayed in Shaftesbury Town Hall.
Family
Shaftesbury married in 1709 Jane Ewer, the daughter of Thomas Ewer of Bushey Hall, Hertfordshire. On 9 February 1711, their only child Anthony, the future fourth Earl was born.
His son succeeded him in his titles and republished Characteristicks in 1732. His great-grandson was the famous philanthropist, Anthony Ashley Cooper, 7th Earl of Shaftesbury.
Publications of Shaftesbury
The following list of Shaftebury's principal publications has been sourced from The third Earl of Shaftesbury, 1671–1713 by Robert Voitle.
- The Danger of Mercenary Parliaments. 1698. With the collaboration of John Toland.
- Select Sermons of Dr. Whichcot. London, 1698. Preface by Shaftesbury.
- An Inquiry Concerning Virtue, in Two Discourses. London, 1699.
- The Adept Ladys or The Angelick Sect. Being the Matters of fact of certain Adventures Spiritual, Philosophical, Political, and Gallant. In a Letter to a Brother. 1702.
- Paradoxes of State, Relating to the Present Juncture of Affairs in England and the rest of Europe; Chiefly grounded on his Majesty's Princely, Pious, and most Gracious Speech. London, 1702. With the collaboration of John Toland.
- The Sociable Enthusiast. A Philosophical Adventure Written to Palemon.
- A Letter Concerning Enthusiasm, To My Lord *****. London, 1708.
- The Moralists, a Philosophical Rhapsody. Being a recital of certain conversations upon natural and moral subjects. London, 1709.
- Sensus Communis: An Essay on the Freedom of Wit and Humour. In a letter to a friend. London, 1709.
- Soliloquy: or, Advice to an Author. London, 1710.
- AΣKHMATA [”Exercises”). Written from 1698 to 1712. Edited by Benjamin Rand in 1900 in The Life, Unpublished Letters, and Philosophical Regimen of Anthony, Earl of Shaftesbury.
- Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. 3 vols. London, 1711.
- Second Characters, or the Language of Forms. Largely written in 1712.
- A Letter Concerning the Art or Science of Design, written from Italy (on the occasion of Some Designs in Painting), to my Lord *****.
- A Notion of the Historical Draught or Tablature of the Judgment of Hercules. 1713.
- Plasticks, or the Original Progress and Power of Designatory Art.
- Several Letters Written by a Noble Lord to a Young Man at the University. London, 1716.
- Letters from the Right Honourable the late Earl of Shaftesbury, to Robert Molesworth, Esq. . . . with two letters written by the late Sir John Cropley. Ed. with an introduction by John Toland. London, 1721.
- Letters of the Earl of Shaftesbury. Collected into one volume, London, 1750.
Notes
- ^ Fowler & Mitchell 1911, p. 763.
- "About". The Clapham Historian. Retrieved 4 April 2016.
- ^ Klein, Lawrence E. "Cooper, Anthony Ashley, third Earl of Shaftesbury (1671–1713)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/6209. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
- The Environs of London: Being an Historical Account of the Towns, Villages, and Hamlets, Within Twelve Miles of that Capital : Interspersed with Biographical Anecdotes. T. Cadell and W. Davies. 1811. pp. 110–111.
- ^ Fowler & Mitchell 1911, pp. 763, 764.
- "Electronic Enlightenment: John Freke to John Locke". www.e-enlightenment.com. 2019. doi:10.13051/ee:doc/lockjoou0080384b1c. Retrieved 31 December 2020.
- ^ Fowler & Mitchell 1911, p. 764.
- ^ "Lord Shaftesbury entry by Michael B. Gill in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 9 September 2016
- Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper of (1711). Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. s.n.
- Willey, Basil (1964). The English Moralists. Chatto & Windus. p. 227.
- Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper of (1711). Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. s.n.
- Richard B. Wolf, The Publication of Shaftesbury's "Letter concerning Enthusiasm", Studies in Bibliography Vol. 32 (1979), pp. 236–241, at pp. 236–237. Published by: Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia JSTOR 40371706
- Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper of (1711). Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. s.n. p. 57.
- Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper of (1711). Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. s.n. p. 151.
- "Anthony Ashley Cooper, Third Earl of Shaftesbury, on the Emotions" entry by Amy M. Schmitter in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2010
- John G. Hayman, The Evolution of "The Moralists", The Modern Language Review Vol. 64, No. 4 (Oct., 1969), pp. 728–733, at p. 728. Published by: Modern Humanities Research Association JSTOR 3723913
- Brett, R. L. (2020). The Third Earl of Shaftesbury: A Study in Eighteenth-Century Literary Theory. Routledge. p. 290. ISBN 978-1-000-03127-0.
- Israel, Jonathan I. (2002). Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. OUP Oxford. pp. 625–626. ISBN 9780191622878.
- Fowler & Mitchell 1911, p. 765 Cites: Inquiry concerning Virtue or Merit, Bk. II. ii. 1.
- Sambrook, James (2014). The Eighteenth Century: The Intellectual and Cultural Context of English Literature 1700–1789. Routledge. p. 70. ISBN 978-1-317-89324-0.
- Bombaro, John J. (2011). Jonathan Edwards's Vision of Reality: The Relationship of God to the World, Redemption History, and the Reprobate. Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 59. ISBN 978-1-63087-812-2.
- ^ Fowler & Mitchell 1911, p. 765.
- Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper Earl of (1977). An Inquiry Concerning Virtue, Or Merit. Manchester University Press. p. xv. ISBN 978-0-7190-0657-9.
- Vicchio, Stephen J. (2007). Jefferson's Religion. Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 60. ISBN 978-1-59752-830-6.
- Chisick, Harvey (2005). Historical Dictionary of the Enlightenment. Scarecrow Press. p. 385. ISBN 978-0-8108-6548-8.
- Bullard, Paddy (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Eighteenth-Century Satire. Oxford University Press. p. 578. ISBN 978-0-19-872783-5.
- Fiering, Norman (2006). Jonathan Edwards's Moral Thought and Its British Context. Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 109 note8. ISBN 978-1-59752-618-0.
- Amir, Lydia B. (2014). Humor and the Good Life in Modern Philosophy: Shaftesbury, Hamann, Kierkegaard. SUNY Press. p. 41. ISBN 978-1-4384-4938-8.
- Alfred Owen Aldridge, Shaftesbury and the Test of Truth, PMLA Vol. 60, No. 1 (Mar., 1945), pp. 129–156, at p. 129. Published by: Modern Language Association JSTOR 459126
- "On Pope"
- William E. Alderman, Pope's "Essay on Man" and Shaftesbury's "The Moralists", The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America Vol. 67, No. 2 (Second Quarter, 1973), pp. 131–140. Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the Bibliographical Society of America JSTOR 24301749
- Darwall, Stephen; Stephen, Darwall (1995). The British Moralists and the Internal 'Ought': 1640–1740. Cambridge University Press. p. 219 and note 25. ISBN 978-0-521-45782-8.
- Haakonssen, Knud (1996). Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press. pp. 231–232. ISBN 978-0-521-49802-9.
- Skorupski, John (2010). The Routledge Companion to Ethics. Routledge. p. 114. ISBN 978-1-136-96422-0.
- Joseph J. Ellis III, The Philosophy of Samuel Johnson, The William and Mary Quarterly Vol. 28, No. 1 (Jan., 1971), pp. 26–45, at p. 44. Published by: Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture JSTOR 1925118
- Staves, Susan (2006). A Literary History of Women's Writing in Britain, 1660–1789. Cambridge University Press. pp. 237–238. ISBN 978-1-139-45858-0.
- Staves, Susan (2006). A Literary History of Women's Writing in Britain, 1660–1789. Cambridge University Press. p. 240. ISBN 978-1-139-45858-0.
- Alfred Owen Aldridge, Shaftesbury and the Deist Manifesto, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society Vol. 41, No. 2 (1951), pp. 297–382, at p. 376. Published by: American Philosophical Society. JSTOR 1005651
- Sabor, Peter; Schellenberg, Betty A. (2017). Samuel Richardson in Context. Cambridge University Press. p. 252. ISBN 978-1-108-32716-9.
- Ross, Ian Campbell (2001). Laurence Sterne: A Life. Oxford University Press. p. 418. ISBN 978-0-19-212235-3.
- Gjesdal, Kristin (2017). Herder's Hermeneutics: History, Poetry, Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press. p. 112 and note 27. ISBN 978-1-107-11286-5.
- Palmer, Joy; Bresler, Liora; Cooper, David (2002). Fifty Major Thinkers on Education: From Confucius to Dewey. Routledge. p. 81. ISBN 978-1-134-73594-5.
- Erdmann, Johann Eduard (2004). A History of Philosophy. Psychology Press. p. 123. ISBN 978-0-415-29542-0.
- "Anthony Ashley-Cooper (1671–1713), 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury". Art UK. Retrieved 18 December 2020.
- Voitle, Robert (1984). The third Earl of Shaftesbury, 1671–1713. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press. pp. 417–418. ISBN 0807111392.
- Attribution
- This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Fowler, Thomas; Mitchell, John Malcolm (1911). "Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, 3rd Earl of". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 24 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 763–765.
Further reading
- Cooper, Anthony Ashley, Earl of Shaftesbury, An Inquiry Concerning Virtue, London, 1699. Facsimile ed., introd. Joseph Filonowicz, 1991, Scholars' Facsimiles & Reprints, ISBN 978-0-8201-1455-2.
- David Walford (editor). An Inquiry Concerning Virtue or Merit. A selection of material from Toland's 1699 edition with introduction.
- Robert B. Voitle, The third Earl of Shaftesbury, 1671–1713, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, c. 1984.
- Edward Chaney (2000), George Berkeley's Grand Tours: The Immaterialist as Connoisseur of Art and Architecture, in E. Chaney, The Evolution of the Grand Tour: Anglo-Italian Cultural Relations since the Renaissance, 2nd ed. London, Routledge
- Watson, Paula; Lancaster, Henry. "ASHLEY, Anthony, Lord Ashley (1671–1713), of Wimborne St. Giles, Dorset". History of Parliament Online. Retrieved 18 January 2023.
- Smith, George H. (2008). "Shaftesbury, Third Earl of (1671–1713)". In Hamowy, Ronald (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Cato Institute. p. 462. doi:10.4135/9781412965811.n282. ISBN 978-1412965804. LCCN 2008009151. OCLC 750831024.
External links
- Works by or about Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury at Wikisource
- Quotations related to Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury at Wikiquote
- Shaftesbury's Characteristicks in three parts
- Contains the five treatises in Shaftesbury's Characteristicks, slightly modified for easier reading
- The Third Earl of Shaftesbury, an article by John McAteer in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2011
Parliament of England | ||
---|---|---|
Preceded bySir Nathaniel Napier, Bt Sir John Trenchard |
Member of Parliament for Poole with Sir Nathaniel Napier, Bt 1695–1698 |
Succeeded byWilliam Joliffe Sir William Phippard |
Peerage of England | ||
Preceded byAnthony Ashley Cooper | Earl of Shaftesbury 1699–1713 |
Succeeded byAnthony Ashley Cooper |
- 1671 births
- 1713 deaths
- 17th-century English philosophers
- 18th-century British essayists
- 18th-century English philosophers
- Age of Enlightenment
- British deists
- English ethicists
- English male essayists
- Cambridge Platonists
- Earls of Shaftesbury
- English essayists
- English MPs 1695–1698
- Enlightenment philosophers
- People educated at Winchester College
- Philosophers of religion
- Philosophers of social science