| Revision as of 07:04, 20 October 2011 editMike Selinker (talk | contribs)Administrators110,883 edits Notification: listing at categories for discussion of Category:Films based on the works of Karen Blixen. (TW)← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 10:38, 7 January 2025 edit undoFavonian (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators287,732 edits →Another: Already done |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |
|
|maxarchivesize = 70K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 70K |
|
|counter = 20 |
|
|counter = 58 |
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|
|algo = old(31d) |
|
|
|
|algo = old(7d) |
|
|archive = User talk:Favonian/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = User talk:Favonian/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Administrator topicon|icon_nr=1|cat=no}} |
|
{{Administrator topicon|icon_nr=1|cat=no}} |
|
{{talkheader}} |
|
{{talkheader}} |
|
|
{{busy}} |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
== Yes, that time of the year again. == |
|
|
|
==Another== |
|
|
|
|
The falling temperatures (at least in the northern hemisphere) and the removal of the greek letters] (]) 15:27, 19 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
Please block 116.121.109.131 and protect the pages they have edited. ] (]) 10:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
:Yup, and the sending off for lengthy periods of time of IP addresses belonging to educational institutions. ] (]) 15:29, 19 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
:{{Already done}} by {{noping|zzuuzz}}. ] (]) 10:38, 7 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
== Manchester article == |
|
|
|
|
|
If Misplaced Pages's rules state that, when edit warring occurs, the disputed content shall be removed while the case is being discussed, I wish that you as an administrator revert Kagg's edit of today, containing the content, so that the article returns to its status ''before'' the edit warring began. At least this is the rule on the Norwegian Misplaced Pages. |
|
|
|
|
|
The content concerned was added on 15th September by a new IP user. By the way, the information ('criminal' and 'bigamous') is already mentioned in this BLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
--- ] (]) 12:07, 20 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I don't believe we have such a rule on the English-language Misplaced Pages. Regarding your last remark, I'm not sure I understand it. My recommendation was that you bring up the issue at ] (better known as BLPN) to start a discussion on whether the contested passages are appropriate or not. ] (]) 12:12, 20 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:: Thanks. I believe that in a relatively short BLP's introduction, such formulations get too explicit and dominating when standing alone (i.e. not in a context). They are now almost like slogans. The BLP guidelines say clearly that BLP articles shall have a nuanced presentation. Since the information concerned already is mentioned elsewhere in the BLP, I consider it as unproblematic that you remove the 'duplicated' text in the introduction. The information per se remains in the article. |
|
|
|
|
|
:: Regarding BLPN: I know about this possibility (however, one cannot use BLP in this case, as the article is created before 2010), but wished first to send a signal via speedy deletion. If one thinks that the article is questionable now, one should have seen it some months ago, before I discovered it. It was really disgusting. There were actually formulations like ''In 1993, when still in a marriage, he married, bigamously, N.N.''(!). This is like 'Rider riding on a horse' etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
:: --- ] (]) 12:27, 20 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::I think you are confusing BLPN with ], which has a "grandfather clause" for articles created before March 2010. The noticeboard is for discussion of all BLP articles, be they ever so ancient. Arguments like the ones you posted above would be suitable at BLPN. ] (]) 12:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::: Thank youu. I was not aware of this noticeboard, which I shall take a look at. |
|
|
|
|
|
:::: --- ] (]) 12:45, 20 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Never ending story 99.63.*.* == |
|
|
|
|
|
Remember {{userlinks|99.63.26.63}}? They just don't stop. See {{userlinks|99.63.24.11}}. Cheers - ] (]) 18:38, 21 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:Can't say I missed them. :( ] (]) 18:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:: ... and back they will be in a few months :-| Thx - ] (]) 19:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
And back they are, this time as {{checkip|217.125.191.56}}. Checked and reverted all edits. Same M.O. - ] (]) 10:32, 6 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Chief Mechanical Engineer == |
|
|
|
|
|
You relisted this since the RFC was open. Now we have two RFCs. If it is OK with you, I think the RM discussion should be closed as no consensus and reopened if needed based on the results there. If I do the close, I'll probably mention the option of converting to a list. ] (]) 23:25, 25 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Sounds like a good idea, and as I'm several time zones ahead of you, I'll do the closing. Fascinating how such seemingly uncontroversial requests can evolve into massive discussions. ] (]) 10:27, 26 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Chembai == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, you have closed the move request in ] article with decision as ''''not moved''''. I respect your decision, but you didn't mention the reason on why and how you arrived at that conclusion. I like to know your reasoning for the decision, since I initiated the move request. </br>Thanking You, <br/>''']''' 04:57, 26 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:The opposing arguments were based on the ], which is a policy that carries considerable weight in naming discussions, even though in many cases it is hard to establish what the most commonly used name is. Your argument, on the other hand, emphasized ] and a more general sense of propriety, which on Misplaced Pages are considered less important than common usage. ] (]) 10:40, 26 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello administrator. Can you delete this page ]? |
|
|
Please read the '''Requested move''': http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Radamel_Falcao. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. --] (]) 10:20, 26 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Even though you and Soul Train have come to an agreement, I would prefer to let the discussion run for a few more days, just to be on the safe side. ] (]) 10:23, 26 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, thanks. :) --] (]) 10:28, 26 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
* OK, rules are rules :)--] (]) 06:40, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Consensus has been found, article renamed, peace on Earth! ] (]) 11:32, 1 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== IP sock of LC == |
|
|
|
|
|
*Hello Favonian. TBH, I knew it would be a matter of time before after I tagged that and it's . Best. {{=)|grin}} --<small>] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup></small> 11:11, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
**He was never known for his subtlety. I detected a peeved tone in his contributions, indicating a disappointment at not having been blocked yet, so I finally complied with his deepest wishes. ] (]) 11:13, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
***And we are only too pleased to aim for his analytics desire when one by one, we close in for the kill. Talk about a whacko who likes being accosted, he tops them all, eh? Anyhow... he was a good laugh, in the end. Best. {{=)|grin}} --<small>] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup></small> 11:22, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
****Pretty obvious. He probably got irked that no one baited him this time. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 16:43, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Relink is the evil. relink mean no got a link in wikipedia here.... == |
|
|
|
|
|
.] ] 12:32, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{Facepalm}}. ] (]) 12:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{Facepalm}}... --<small>] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup></small> 12:49, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::{{Facepalm}}...{{Facepalm}}...{{Facepalm}}...etc. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 21:35, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
{{outdent|3}} I seem to have started a ]. The Foundation has been contacted! ] (]) 21:42, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:* --<small>] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup></small> 21:45, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::*He's been scared away. Or in his own words, "Nobody want me here im leaveing for good just stupid bye". Now, who can argue with ''that???'' ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 22:41, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::*Ungrammatical, but heartfelt. Let's wish him success in his future endeavors—somewhere else. ] (]) 22:50, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::::*I spoke too soon, as he created a sock and also had edited under an IP a day or two ago. More amusement there, if you're interested. :) ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 23:24, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::*Here's a clip from a 1938 cartoon showing a facepalm. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 12:02, 29 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::*Brilliant! It should be turned into an animated GIF. Bound to be a hit at ANI and similar, lighthearted venues. ] (]) 12:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Thanks again. == |
|
|
|
|
|
An actually helpful editor, instead of being rude and just shouting "no", has informed me the proper template is MFD and I am working on that now. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 12:53, 27 September 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Close of move request at MCG (disambiguation) == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, Favonian. I'm a bit puzzled by your close of the move request at ]. While opinion was fairly evenly split, isn't that disagreement actually evidence that there is no primary topic, and that the page should be moved? ] <sup><small><small>]</small></small></sup> 13:12, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:Not in my opinion. When !votes are evenly split with regard to changing the status quo, I prefer to close as "no consensus", whether the question is "primary or not" or some other renaming issue. ] (]) 13:18, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Do you support banned user: Iaaasi? == |
|
|
|
|
|
] is romani-an chauvinist Iaaasi's meta/sock -puppet. Why do you support his edits? (you always restored his bad faith edits or chauvinist provocation in ] article. |
|
|
|
|
|
Moreover, there is no other English language (real printed!) encyclopedia in the world, which use so-called bynames/nicknames in the title of the articles. "Matthias Corvinus" is not official name it's just a nick name of the Monarch. Please Modify the title of the article to Matthias I of Hungary. |
|
|
|
|
|
Columbia Encyclopedia |
|
|
|
|
|
Encyclopædia Britannica |
|
|
|
|
|
Encyclopædia Universalis |
|
|
|
|
|
Encarta Encyclopedia (2009) |
|
|
|
|
|
Brockhaus Enzyklopädie |
|
|
|
|
|
Encyclopaedia Larousse <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:01, 27 September 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
:And whose little edit-warring, IP-jumping sock might you be? The current name of the article was the result of ]. Edit-warring to effect changes against consensus is disruptive and may well lead to you being blocked from editing. ] (]) 15:15, 27 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
HAhaha:)))))) consensus of laymen? The voters were Romani-an users Serbs Slovaks? Who are not from native English speaker countries, who are not even Hungarians. It is an English (not romani serb slovak etc...)encyclopedia about a Hungarian (and not romani-an serbian slovak) king. British American Academic historians call him officially as Matthias I of Hungary, every english language encíclopedia use the Matthias I of Hungary title. Matthias Corvinus are represented as byname. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:18, 27 September 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP2 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Hello == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, is there a possibility of protecting the talk page also ? It is very tempting for ] considering that this move request was his idea and there are various comments from his behalf. Thank you. ] (]) 06:51, 29 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:We are ''very'' reluctant to protect talk pages, especially when a discussion like the proposed move is in progress. Reporting the issue to SPI, like you did {{diff2|453034714|here}}, is a better way to proceed. ] (]) 12:59, 29 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Tfd: Facepalm == |
|
|
|
|
|
*See ] |
|
|
*{{Facepalm}}... Goodness, gracious, great balls of fire~! --<small>] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup></small> 17:13, 3 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::Holy Cow, Batman! What a {{redact|wanker|expletive deleted}}. ] (]) 17:18, 3 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== 72.29.67.172 == |
|
|
|
|
|
I've been tracking this guy for the past month or so, since he seems to have it out for me. Apparently he finally got hit with a rangeblock, so now he's using proxies. on the one you just blocked. --] | (]) 20:00, 3 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:A real pal you got there. I have your talk page and his other favorite targets watchlisted, so it'll be strictly ]. The proxy in question certainly got closed down for a very long time. ] (]) 20:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
I seconded your suspicions of ] at ] but it appears there is no interest in pursuing any further sockpuppets or the sockmaster. I have also noticed some curious editing patterns, particularly surrounding the article ] and several related articles that have recently been deleted. |
|
|
|
|
|
On July 14, ] was nominated for deletion by the sockpuppet ]. The same day, ] also nominated ]. After no activity, the Grimley article was relisted and received a delete vote from ]. Still having no consensus, it was relisted again and received delete votes from ] and the sockpuppet ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
On July 31, the article ] was nominated by ] and received a delete vote from ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
On August 5, the article was proposed for deletion. |
|
|
|
|
|
On August 8, sockpuppet ] unlinked Poop Alley Studios and WIN Records in the ] article (see ). I undid one of the changes because Poop Alley Studios was not yet a red link at the time. I initially noticed this edit because I assumed ] was a sockpuppet of ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
On August 12, Poop Alley Studios was deleted. It would be nice to know which user proposed the deletion. I'm not privy to that information. |
|
|
|
|
|
On August 16, ] unlinked Poop Alley Studios (see ) |
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, on August 29 ] deleted the entire sentence that once had links to all of the above deleted articles (see ). |
|
|
|
|
|
It all seems peculiar to me. Thought it might be of interest to you. ] (]) 02:58, 4 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Time to get this show on the road. I've opened ] and took the liberty of adding your observations to the case. ] (]) 13:40, 4 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== TheOrangeOne149 == |
|
|
|
|
|
You recently warned TheOrangeOne149 regarding unverified additions to ]. An editor at IP 68.48.116.119 made virtually identical edits to that page, as well as one edit to ]. I reversed the edit to Orange (word), and now TheOrangeOne149 has re-added that information. Although the edits to Orange (word) are not vandalism (they just give undue weight to one of the dozens of things called "]"), TheOrangeOne149 feels like a disruptive editor. ] (]) 10:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:Not a particularly constructive editor, that's for sure. If he persists, he'll come into conflict with ]/]. ] (]) 20:33, 5 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Help == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, thank you for the help provided. Is there a posibility of deleting the history of the youtube video and as you did here ? ] (]) 18:24, 5 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:Probably too late now. ] (]) 20:30, 5 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
=== Hello === |
|
|
{{you've got mail}} Regarding this incident. Greetings. ] (]) 07:02, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== A barnstar for you! == |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Writer's Barnstar''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | A special Writer's barnstar 4 u!! ] (]) 05:55, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Mikemikev socks == |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for having taken care of . See also ]. I'm pretty sure we haven't seen the last of this. Cheers - ] (]) 10:27, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:Pretty safe bet. With any bit of luck, I'm now on his official shit list. ] (]) 10:30, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::To bad his attack on my talk isn't visible anymore. I had a ''very'' quick look at it, and noticed that he had signed it with a specific name, which —alas— I have forgotten now. After I had copied the diff of his edit I went back to have a closer look, but I came late. If you still have access to the content of the edit and/or recall the name he used, I'd appreciate (just out of pure curiosity) it if you would email it to me. TIA & cheers - ] (]) 11:25, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Done. ] (]) 11:31, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Thanks. I'll have to check later today — address invalid or forgot password. Perhaps I'll ask to try again after I have changed my address/pwd. I'll get back to you later... - ] (]) 13:03, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::::It looks like my email address wasn't valid anymore. I just created, confirmed and tested a new one, so could you please send it to me again? Thanks a bunch! - ] (]) 15:37, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Done again ;) ] (]) 15:40, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Disappeared edit button == |
|
|
|
|
|
In the ] article, the edit buttons in each sub-section are non-existent for some reason. The only place you can edit Will Smith is from the top tab. Do you know why this is? ] ] 22:20, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:No explanation. It looks perfectly normal, when I access the article. ] (]) 22:25, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{tps}} I also do not get the subsection edit commands. This might be part of this message "The MediaWiki software was updated to version 1.18 on 5 October 2011. Technical bugs and problems should be discussed at the ] or can be reported through the ]" at the top of our watchlists. I hope that this is of some help for you. ] | ] 22:30, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Please Reply == |
|
|
|
|
|
I was writing a Sandbox UML Specifications for Relational Database and I Received a message. I don't understand what is been blocked-User account/ Sandbox or am I not allowed to write an article for the Sandbox. Please Reply me because I am really willing to write the article. And also give me further instructions if any. |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 16:24, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Regarding one block == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, I see that you blocked ], I just want to make sure that did you block that IP also? because it belongs to the Hostel of one of the colleges which is a part of ] and students were complaining that they are unable to edit. Please get back to us as soon as possible. Thanks. ] (]) 17:47, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Sometimes... == |
|
|
|
|
|
... I wonder :-| Cheers and thx. - ] (]) 10:57, 10 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
* Indeed! The IP has been given time to follow your advice and read up on assorted policies and guidelines. ] (]) 10:59, 10 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
* It is the culture after all ;). Was going to come here asking for a softerblock on said IP but decided not to... ]<sup> ]</sup> 11:52, 10 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
**In view of the IP's most recent statement of intent, complete with hints of impending sockpuppetry, softening the block is probably not the way to go, but thanks for your attempts to bring about Peace on <s>Earth</s> Misplaced Pages! ] (]) 12:00, 10 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
*** Yea, I'm done. Although I do sometimes feel like there should be an ]. I wasn't asking for a block change just saying I contemplated it. Cheers. ]<sup> ]</sup> 12:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Please help == |
|
|
|
|
|
I am from College of Engg. Pune and I was writing "UML specifications for Relational database" in my sandbox. And then suddenly I got your message-"You are currently unable to edit pages on Misplaced Pages due to an autoblock affecting your IP address". We are writing wiki-articles as an academic course assignment under India Education Program. I don't understand this, If somebody from our subnet has created the user:Fucksummer then why should I suffer. Sir, Please help me by unblocking me. I have talked to our Course wiki-ambassador: user:Rangilo Gujrati. You can talk to him also. But please help me. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
|
|
|
|
|
=== Sorry === |
|
|
|
|
|
I just saw that You have unblocked me. Sorry for the previous message I apologize for that. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:59, 11 October 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Please could you put her in my user space. ] ] 22:55, 11 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{Done}}. ] (]) 23:19, 11 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::Many thanks. ] ] 09:29, 13 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Bagh-e-Attar Jamshedpur == |
|
|
|
|
|
] <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:40, 12 October 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
:Huh? ] (]) 09:43, 12 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Thank you == |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your reverts on my userpage and usertalk, and for the temporary block. Have a good day! ] (]) 12:33, 12 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:Same to you! ] (]) 12:35, 12 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== 3RR case == |
|
|
|
|
|
Please note that the reported editor in ] has been . See ]. This could imply that the article protection is no longer needed. Thanks, ] (]) 03:56, 13 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thanks for the note. Not a surprising outcome ;) I have reverted the protection to pre-war state. ] (]) 06:54, 13 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Please would you change the descriptor. It is generally agreed he was never a property developer. Do we describe him according to what he is now best known as/for or what he has been known for? ] ] 15:08, 13 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:It's clear from the move log that your previous attempt to rename the article was contested, so you will have to submit it to ]. ] (]) 15:14, 13 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Please review these blocks == |
|
|
|
|
|
There was a ] in MediaWiki 1.18 that caused blocks made via the API to have talk page access disabled when it should have been enabled. This also affected scripts such as ]. Please review the following blocks to make sure that you really intended talk page access to be disabled, and reblock if necessary. |
|
|
# {{user-multi|User=81.135.42.105|t|bl|bu}} by ] at 2011-10-13T16:09:58Z, expires 2011-10-14T16:09:58Z: <nowiki>]</nowiki> |
|
|
# {{user-multi|User=193.62.111.31|t|bl|bu}} by ] at 2011-10-07T10:20:54Z, expires 2012-01-07T10:20:54Z: <nowiki>]</nowiki> |
|
|
# {{user-multi|User=Groutems|t|bl|bu}} by ] at 2011-10-12T12:29:15Z, expires infinity: <nowiki>]</nowiki> |
|
|
# {{user-multi|User=Jonnyroshan|t|bl|bu}} by ] at 2011-10-13T15:24:21Z, expires infinity: <nowiki>] or ]</nowiki> |
|
|
If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to post at ]. Thanks! ]] 02:05, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Thanks for you (script-assisted) note. The above mentioned blocks are all for IMO obvious block avoiding trolls, so the disabling of talk page access was deliberate. ] (]) 07:42, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== I think you undid a vandalism removal == |
|
|
|
|
|
Correct me if I am wrong, but I think you undid a removal of vandalism (even if it was by the person who was mass reverting) on ]. I've undone your undo as such (using the AGF rollback link), but feel free to undo me if you meant to do that. ] (] | ]) 22:17, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:That may well be. I mass reverted an IP jumping troll, and admittedly didn't check the details. Thanks for being more careful than me. ] (]) 22:20, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::No problem. ] (] | ]) 22:22, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Thank you again == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Favonian, Thanks again for keeping an eye on things and the reversion you did on my talk page. --<font color="green">]</font> 22:23, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:No problem. That guy seriously needs to get a life. ] (]) 22:24, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::You'll get no argument from me mate. --<font color="green">]</font> 23:01, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Please go through w/o v vara prasad articles discussion page == |
|
|
|
|
|
and talk - I did not do any disruptive edits |
|
|
(] (]) 12:07, 15 October 2011 (UTC)). |
|
|
|
|
|
:You may ''not'' remove the AfD tag. State your case regarding the notability of the article at ]. ] (]) 12:10, 15 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
=== Okay, but what is ur problem??? admin did nto post the article for deletion template === |
|
|
|
|
|
(] (]) 12:12, 15 October 2011 (UTC)). |
|
|
:Answered on your talk page. ] (]) 12:14, 15 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have stated my case about the Non sense created by you and other user |
|
|
A directors filmography is notable by itself. |
|
|
so i think this clears ur amateurish knowldge in removing the template about article for deletion |
|
|
|
|
|
I cant understand why editors like u are entertained |
|
|
|
|
|
(] (]) 12:17, 15 October 2011 (UTC)). |
|
|
|
|
|
=== now what u do is - go through the below ABC's of wikipedia below === |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
and take this issue to the concerned person and make sure, u remove the template as soon as possible |
|
|
wasting valuable time of editors here |
|
|
|
|
|
(] (]) 12:19, 15 October 2011 (UTC)). |
|
|
|
|
|
:Such discussions usually run for a week. Meanwhile, I would strongly suggest that you stop yelling at people who disagree with you. We have rules regarding ] and ]. ] (]) 12:22, 15 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== A barnstar for you! == |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | You have been wonderful on Misplaced Pages to me, even though you may not know it. Thank you. ] (]) 21:37, 16 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
:Intriguing. Thanks for the star, be it ever so mysterious. ] (]) 08:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Libya-related disruption... == |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for nabbing one of the IPs spamming my talkpage. This is the same guy that started harassing me some months ago on my userpage (leading to its semi-protection) after my reversions of his disruption on the ] page. He uses dynamic IPs, which makes him hard to pin down. Hopefully he gets bored of this soon. |
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, there is ] trolling away at ] in violation of ] and in spite of being warned not to. A block would be welcomed by the productive editors of the page, if you believe it warranted. ~~ ] (]) 06:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:No problem. The new IP has been inactive for several hours now, so he may have moved on. I have reverted his recent outburst and will monitor the situation. ] (]) 08:28, 17 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Could you give me a hand with something? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Could you please, please, please immediately "unprotect" ] so that me and ] can go in and edit it? Yes, I have left messages on the talk page of the protecting admin, but he hasn't responded as he is on a prolonged vacation. Doing this would harmonize and bring up-to-date all of the articles on South Asian population genetics, so that everybody has freely available and accurate info. Muchas, muchas gracias. |
|
|
|
|
|
--] (]) 14:08, 17 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Looks like Fastily took care of it. ] (]) 10:16, 18 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Question == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Favonian, noticed you were on and was hoping I could get a second opinion about something. This is not actionable, right? – ] <sup>(])</sup> 11:00, 18 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:The particular section of your talk page is not, IMO, actionable. I haven't ploughed through the humongous MfD, but I did notice your use of the word "lying" about your opponent and that is something you should probably refrain from repeating. Enjoy your victory, and don't prolong the battle. ] (]) 11:12, 18 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
==Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Films based on the works of Karen Blixen== |
|
|
|
|
|
''']''', which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 07:04, 20 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
Already done by zzuuzz. Favonian (talk) 10:38, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
