Misplaced Pages

User talk:Hi Balloon Boy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:58, 23 October 2011 editScjessey (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,030 edits Caution: Page blanking, removal of content on Barack Obama. using TW← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:01, 14 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,670,455 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (4x), <center> (1x)Tag: Fixed lint errors 
(20 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
{|align=center class="current" style="background: #997A8D; float:center; border:2px solid #191970; -moz-border-radius:15px; text-align:center; font-size:95%; font-family:Berlin Sans FB; padding:4px; width:60%; color:#FBEC5D" {|align=center class="current" style="background: #997A8D; float:center; border:2px solid #191970; -moz-border-radius:15px; text-align:center; font-size:95%; font-family:Berlin Sans FB; padding:4px; width:60%; color:#FBEC5D"
|] |]
|<center>'''Requesting editors' help'''</center> |<div class="center">'''Requesting editors' help'''</div>
There is currently an oppened ] which aims in improving articles related to typefaces and font categorization. If you´re interested in this subject, please visit the ], add your self and see how you can help. There is currently an oppened ] which aims in improving articles related to typefaces and font categorization. If you´re interested in this subject, please visit the ], add your self and see how you can help.
|} |}
I hope you can contribute in this section. Happy editings! - ]] ]<font color="#808080">] -- <small>20:32, 18 October 2009 (UTC)</small></font> I hope you can contribute in this section. Happy editings! - ]] ]<span style="color: #808080;">] -- <small>20:32, 18 October 2009 (UTC)</small></span>


==Hi Back==
Thanks for your note. Working on aircraft articles is one of my specialties here on Misplaced Pages. With over 3 million articles on Misplaced Pages right now it helps to narrow the field down a bit!- ] (]) 20:32, 18 October 2009 (UTC)


== Re: ? ==


Well, related to typography, there are several articles and images missing. You can see all the red links in ], and blank spaces (where there should be an image) in ] or ] or ], etc... The goal of the collaboration is to upgrade and improve all those things. If you go to the ], you will find further information and open tasks as well as instructions about all this. That´s basically all.<br>This is a personal request for help in a task here in wikipedia. If you´re interested in collaborate, go ahead! - ]] ]<font color="#808080">] -- <small>20:42, 18 October 2009 (UTC)</small></font>


I did clearly discuss why some trivial bits should not be in the article. The removed parts were a few sentences of laws that President Obama did not actively campaign for or make it a signature issue. If these are included, the article ceases to be "Barack Obama" but becomes "The World during President Obama's Life" ] (]) 02:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
:Sorry, I was absent for some minutes... don´t worry about it, it will be developed over time, it´s just that it´s still too short to be even a stub. You can search for more information in one of the references I posted in the collaboration page. - ]] ]<font color="#808080">] -- <small>21:22, 18 October 2009 (UTC)</small></font>


== Unsourced ==


] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without ] a ]{{#if:|, as you did to ],}} is not consistent with our policy of ]. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with ], please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> ] (]) 20:56, 18 October 2009 (UTC)


<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. v/r - ]] 14:55, 24 October 2011 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->
==] nomination of ]==
] Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use ] for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the ] if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the ].


{{unblock reviewed | 1=Please unblock. Before being blocked, I clearly stated on my page that I would step back from the Obama article. Please also see that I am making valid and constructive suggestions (noting that some laws are not a significant part of the Obama bio). Note that some others have been very rude and TParis did not block them. By unblocking me, you will create a congenial environment for Misplaced Pages. Remember, that I voluntarily pledged to step away BEFORE being blocked and I was also not warned by TParis. If you do not unblock me, you just poison the atmosphere and make wikipedia look savage. Thank you very much. Please assume good faith and unblock me. A new promise....if you unblock me, I will not edit any Obama articles for 1 month-----a win win. If you don't unblock, the block expires in 24 hours and you'll have a person very upset (maybe mad) for being unfairly treated. Thank you. | decline=I'm sorry, but ] and claiming that a refusal to unblock "make(s) wikipedia look savage" will not get your block lifted early. Please ] and try again. ]]] 15:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC)}}
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that they ] the page or have a copy emailed to you.<!-- Template:Db-test-notice --> ] (])


Hi, I tried to fix the article a bit to adhere to the style of other typeface articles. If you want you can fill in the rest of the template. ] (]) 21:11, 18 October 2009 (UTC) :I am not an admin, but I suggest strongly that threats are not helpful here. ] (]) 15:13, 24 October 2011 (UTC)


:::I am not threatening, merely stating the facts. My block expires in 24 hours. If unblocked now, I will look at that as a sign that some people in Misplaced Pages are reasonable and, in return, will not edit the Obama article for one month. See, I am generous in return. That is generosity, not threatening. ] (]) 15:34, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
== October 2011 ==
::You said two days ago and yet today you were . I see plenty of warnings above the block notice and some significant ]. You're failing to understand what ''your'' behavior warranted the block and you continue to ] other editors (and Misplaced Pages) for doing wrong.--v/r - ]] 15:25, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from ]. When removing content, please specify a reason in the ] and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> ] (]) 02:39, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
::::I said I would step back for a day and did so for longer than 24 hours. See, I am honest and do not lie. I also do not falsely accuse, like some others (Scjessey and others). I just made some very good suggestions about portions of the Obama bio that are not significantly related to his bio. In retrospect, I have to admit that there is a very strong gay lobby and they want mention of gay issues. Maybe I should tread carefully and not offend gay people even though it makes the Obama article bad. Maybe I should select other areas to improve the article and give gay people space to promote their pet issues? Sorry, I have nothing against gay people. In fact, I don't mind gay marriages. ] (]) 15:34, 24 October 2011 (UTC)


{{unblock reviewed | 1=TnXMan declined my unblock request and asked me to read a link on unblocking and then ask for unblock. I have read this carefully. Please unblock me. I am also complying with an administrator who asked me to both read the policies and then ask for unblock. I see why some people are mad. Further unblock is only punishment and blocking is not supposed to be punishment. I agree to follow every Misplaced Pages policy. I have never knowingly violated any and will not do so in the future. Thank you. | decline=Your earlier unblock request cinches this one. You threatened that, if you weren't unblocked, we'd have a very "upset" person on our hands. If you're not ready to deal with the consequences of your actions, as demonstrated in your earlier message, I don't think simply reading a policy will help here. Please don't make another unblock request for the duration of your block, and please do not make threats. Thanks, ] 16:04, 24 October 2011 (UTC)}}
:You really should specifically address the reasons for your block- your behavior and what you will do to avoid blocking in the future. A vague "I see why people are mad" is not really helpful. ]]] 15:52, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
==] case==
{| align="left" style="background: transparent;"
|| ]
|}
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a ] case. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] (]) 18:18, 24 October 2011 (UTC)


The result was NOT a confirmed. It was closed as not conclusive because I am not a sock.
I did clearly discuss why some trivial bits should not be in the article. The removed parts were a few sentences of laws that President Obama did not actively campaign for or make it a signature issue. If these are included, the article ceases to be "Barack Obama" but becomes "The World during President Obama's Life" ] (]) 02:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

:Because you deleted the cited content before ''first'' discussing it and seeking a consensus for such a drastic change, I restored it. Following your comment on the article talk page, I replied with my reasons for restoring the content. -- ] (]) 02:45, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

::Please self-revert. You have removed a large amount of cited content without seeking a consensus for doing so. By doing it a ''second'' time, you have basically performed an act of vandalism. Failure to do so in a timely manner will lead to a formal warning. -- ] (]) 02:51, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

:::Please stop acting like a bully. You have proven that you are a machine. You have no good reason. If someone else (not you) offers a good reason to reinsert 1 sentence, then that is good faith. If they offer good reasons to reinsert 2 sentences, then that is also good faith. By falsely accusing people of vandalism, you are poisoning Misplaced Pages. Here's what I will do. I will NOT make any more changes today and you should not either. If someone else has a good explanation, so be it. I hope you won't be a bully and threaten me or mechanically change it back. ] (]) 02:55, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


==Request==
] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been ]. Please make use of the ] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> ] (]) 02:58, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed | 1=I would like to say sorry to everyone that was offended. My suggested edits, trimming very obscure laws that were passed during the Obama term were not all needed for the article, was and is a good idea but I now realize that there are strong emotions about President Obama so will let those with heated feelings just edit the article themselves. I am not asking for unblock but posting so that someone will read this (unblock requests are automatically read by someone). Thank you | decline=You're not asking to be unblocked. Please keep in mind, unblock requests are ''not'' read by "everyone." When this block is up, don't edit war and don't stir things up by making more threats. ] (]) 13:53, 25 October 2011 (UTC)}}

Latest revision as of 23:01, 14 March 2023

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Hi Balloon Boy, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  - Ahunt (talk) 20:26, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Invitation for the typeface collaboration

Requesting editors' help

There is currently an oppened collaboration which aims in improving articles related to typefaces and font categorization. If you´re interested in this subject, please visit the collaboration page, add your self and see how you can help.

I hope you can contribute in this section. Happy editings! - Damërung . -- 20:32, 18 October 2009 (UTC)



I did clearly discuss why some trivial bits should not be in the article. The removed parts were a few sentences of laws that President Obama did not actively campaign for or make it a signature issue. If these are included, the article ceases to be "Barack Obama" but becomes "The World during President Obama's Life" Hi Balloon Boy (talk) 02:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Barack Obama. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. v/r - TP 14:55, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hi Balloon Boy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please unblock. Before being blocked, I clearly stated on my page that I would step back from the Obama article. Please also see that I am making valid and constructive suggestions (noting that some laws are not a significant part of the Obama bio). Note that some others have been very rude and TParis did not block them. By unblocking me, you will create a congenial environment for Misplaced Pages. Remember, that I voluntarily pledged to step away BEFORE being blocked and I was also not warned by TParis. If you do not unblock me, you just poison the atmosphere and make wikipedia look savage. Thank you very much. Please assume good faith and unblock me. A new promise....if you unblock me, I will not edit any Obama articles for 1 month-----a win win. If you don't unblock, the block expires in 24 hours and you'll have a person very upset (maybe mad) for being unfairly treated. Thank you.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but blaming others and claiming that a refusal to unblock "make(s) wikipedia look savage" will not get your block lifted early. Please read this and try again. TNXMan 15:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not an admin, but I suggest strongly that threats are not helpful here. PhGustaf (talk) 15:13, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
I am not threatening, merely stating the facts. My block expires in 24 hours. If unblocked now, I will look at that as a sign that some people in Misplaced Pages are reasonable and, in return, will not edit the Obama article for one month. See, I am generous in return. That is generosity, not threatening. Hi Balloon Boy (talk) 15:34, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
You said that you would step back two days ago and yet today you were engaging in the same edit war. I see plenty of warnings above the block notice and some significant competence issues. You're failing to understand what your behavior warranted the block and you continue to blame other editors (and Misplaced Pages) for doing wrong.--v/r - TP 15:25, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
I said I would step back for a day and did so for longer than 24 hours. See, I am honest and do not lie. I also do not falsely accuse, like some others (Scjessey and others). I just made some very good suggestions about portions of the Obama bio that are not significantly related to his bio. In retrospect, I have to admit that there is a very strong gay lobby and they want mention of gay issues. Maybe I should tread carefully and not offend gay people even though it makes the Obama article bad. Maybe I should select other areas to improve the article and give gay people space to promote their pet issues? Sorry, I have nothing against gay people. In fact, I don't mind gay marriages. Hi Balloon Boy (talk) 15:34, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hi Balloon Boy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

TnXMan declined my unblock request and asked me to read a link on unblocking and then ask for unblock. I have read this carefully. Please unblock me. I am also complying with an administrator who asked me to both read the policies and then ask for unblock. I see why some people are mad. Further unblock is only punishment and blocking is not supposed to be punishment. I agree to follow every Misplaced Pages policy. I have never knowingly violated any and will not do so in the future. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Your earlier unblock request cinches this one. You threatened that, if you weren't unblocked, we'd have a very "upset" person on our hands. If you're not ready to deal with the consequences of your actions, as demonstrated in your earlier message, I don't think simply reading a policy will help here. Please don't make another unblock request for the duration of your block, and please do not make threats. Thanks, m.o.p 16:04, 24 October 2011 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You really should specifically address the reasons for your block- your behavior and what you will do to avoid blocking in the future. A vague "I see why people are mad" is not really helpful. TNXMan 15:52, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Gaydenver for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Dave Dial (talk) 18:18, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

The result was NOT a confirmed. It was closed as not conclusive because I am not a sock.

Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hi Balloon Boy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to say sorry to everyone that was offended. My suggested edits, trimming very obscure laws that were passed during the Obama term were not all needed for the article, was and is a good idea but I now realize that there are strong emotions about President Obama so will let those with heated feelings just edit the article themselves. I am not asking for unblock but posting so that someone will read this (unblock requests are automatically read by someone). Thank you

Decline reason:

You're not asking to be unblocked. Please keep in mind, unblock requests are not read by "everyone." When this block is up, don't edit war and don't stir things up by making more threats. Gwen Gale (talk) 13:53, 25 October 2011 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.