Misplaced Pages

The Passion of the Christ: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:34, 8 November 2011 editStAnselm (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers160,696 edits Reverted good faith edits by Oknazevad (talk): No, this was a good edit - the sources says "I myself am no longer religious in the sense that a long-ago altar boy thought he sh...← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:08, 8 January 2025 edit undoDoniago (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers113,428 editsm Reverted edits by 150.107.175.160 (talk) to last version by Sthacker21 source?Tag: Rollback 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|2004 film by Mel Gibson}}
{{About|the film|the passions of Jesus Christ|Passion (Christianity)}}
{{About|the film|the religious incident on which the film is based|Passion of Jesus|the set of paintings|The Passion of Christ (Strasbourg)}}
{{Use American English|date=August 2019}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2019}}
{{Infobox film {{Infobox film
| name = The Passion of the Christ | name = The Passion of the Christ
| image = The Passion of the Christ poster.png
| image = Thepassionposterface-1-.jpg
| alt = The Passion of the Christ poster
| image_size = 215px
| caption = Theatrical release poster
| alt =
| director = ]
| caption = Theatrical release poster
| producer = {{Plainlist|
| director = ]
*]
| producer = ]<br />Mel Gibson<br />]<br />Enzo Sisti
*]
| screenplay = ]<br />Mel Gibson<br />] (translation)
*]
| based on = ]
}}
| starring = ]<br />]<br />]<br />]
| screenplay = {{Plainlist|
| music = ]
*Mel Gibson
*]
}}
| based_on = {{Plainlist|
* The ] in the ] of the ]
*] by ]
}}
| starring = {{Plainlist|
*]
*]
*]
*]
}}
| music = ]
| cinematography = ] | cinematography = ]
| editing = ] | editing = {{plainlist|
*]
*Steve Mirkovich
| studio = ]
}}
| distributor = ] {{small|(])}}<br />] {{small|(])}}
| studio = ]
| released = {{Film date|2004|02|25}}
| distributor = ]
| runtime = 126 minutes
| country = {{Film US}} | released = {{Film date|2004|02|25}}
| runtime = 127 minutes<!--Theatrical runtime: 126:35--><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbfc.co.uk/releases/passion-christ-2004-4|title=''The Passion of the Christ'' (18)|website=]|date=February 18, 2004|access-date=June 2, 2013|archive-date=September 22, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130922053517/http://www.bbfc.co.uk/releases/passion-christ-2004-4|url-status=live}}</ref><!-- initial release only -->
| language = Aramaic<br />Latin
| country = United States
| budget = $30 million
| language = {{Plainlist|
| gross = $611,899,420
*Aramaic
*Hebrew
*Latin
}}
| budget = $30 million<ref name="BOM">{{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=passionofthechrist.htm |title=''The Passion of the Christ'' (2004) |website=] |date=2004 |access-date=February 5, 2009 |archive-date=January 29, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090129075849/http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=passionofthechrist.htm |url-status=live }}</ref>
| gross = $612.1 million<ref name="BOM"/>
}} }}
'''''The Passion of the Christ''''' (sometimes referred to as '''''The Passion'''''<ref name=noonan />) is a 2004 American ] directed by ] and starring ] as Jesus. It depicts the ] of Jesus largely according to the ] Gospels of ], ], ] and ]. It also draws on other devotional writings, such as those disputedly attributed to ].<ref name=America >Father John O' Malley ''A Movie, a Mystic, a Spiritual Tradition'' ], March 15, 2004 </ref><ref name=Corl >''Jesus and Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ'' by Kathleen E. Corley, Robert Leslie Webb 2004 ISBN 082647781X pages 160-161</ref><ref>''Mel Gibson's Passion and philosophy'' by Jorge J. E. Gracia 2004 ISBN 0812695712 page 145</ref><ref name=Dimare >''Movies in American History: An Encyclopedia'' edited by Philip C. Dimare 2011 ISBN 159884296X page 909</ref>


'''''The Passion of the Christ''''' is a 2004 American ] ] ] co-written, co-produced, and directed by ]. It stars ] as ], ] as ], and ] as ]. It depicts the ] largely according to the gospels of ], ], ], and ]. It also draws on pious accounts such as the ], along with other devotional writings, such as the reputed visions attributed to ].<ref name="America">{{cite magazine |last=O'Malley |first=John |title=A Movie, a Mystic, a Spiritual Tradition |magazine=] |date=March 15, 2004 |url=http://americamagazine.org/content/article.cfm?article_id%3D3481%26comments%3D1 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111005193623/http://americamagazine.org/content/article.cfm?article_id=3481&comments=1 |archive-date=October 5, 2011}}</ref><ref name="Corl">{{cite book |last1=Corley |first1=Kathleen E. |last2=Webb |first2=Robert Leslie |title=Jesus and Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ |year=2004 |pages=160–161 |publisher=A&C Black |isbn=0-8264-7781-X}}</ref><ref name="Garcia">{{cite book |last=Gracia |first=Jorge J. E. |title=Mel Gibson's Passion and philosophy |year=2004 |page=145 |publisher=Open Court |isbn=0-8126-9571-2}}</ref><ref name="Dimare">{{cite book |editor-last=Dimare |editor-first=Philip C. |title=Movies in American History: An Encyclopedia |year=2011 |page=909 |publisher=Abc-Clio |isbn=978-1-59884-296-8}}</ref>
''The Passion of the Christ'' covers the final 12 hours of Jesus' life beginning with the ] and ending with a brief depiction of his ]. Flashbacks of Jesus as a child, the ], the ], etc. are also included.


As per the title, the film primarily covers the final 12 hours before Jesus Christ's death, known as "the Passion". It begins with ] in the ] (i.e., Gethsemane), continues with the betrayal of ], the brutal ], the suffering of Mary as prophesied by ], the ], and ends with a brief depiction of ]. The narrative is interspersed with moments in Jesus's life, such as ] and ], and moments of Jesus' early life. The film was mostly shot in ].<ref> ''Movie-Locations''</ref> The dialogue is entirely in reconstructed ], ], and ]. Although Gibson was initially against it, the film is subtitled.
The film has been highly controversial and received mixed reviews, with the complaint that the extreme violence in the movie obscures its message."<ref name=EW /><ref name=tomatoes /><ref name=metacritic /><ref name=Roger /> Catholic sources have questioned the authenticity of the non-Biblical material the film drew on.<ref name=America /><ref name=Anvil />


The film was controversial and received polarized reviews from critics; some regarded the film a religious and holy experience, praising the performances of the cast, production values, and ]'s musical score, while some found it to be ] and the graphic violence to be extreme and emotionally draining. The film grossed over $612 million worldwide,<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Passion of the Christ|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0335345/|access-date=2020-11-04|website=Box Office Mojo|archive-date=June 13, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200613145608/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0335345/|url-status=live}}</ref> and became the ] internationally at the end of its theatrical run.<ref name="BOM"/> It is the highest-grossing (inflation unadjusted) ] of all time, as well as the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/genres/chart/?id=christian.htm|title=Christian Movies at the Box Office|website=Box Office Mojo|access-date=April 23, 2019|archive-date=August 29, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190829104513/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/genres/chart/?id=christian.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Barker |first=Stephen |date=2020-10-17 |title=The 10 Highest-Grossing Independent Films Of All Time |url=https://screenrant.com/highest-grossing-independent-films-ever-indie-movies/ |access-date=2022-10-11 |website=ScreenRant |language=en-US |archive-date=October 11, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221011095903/https://screenrant.com/highest-grossing-independent-films-ever-indie-movies/ |url-status=live }}</ref> It was the highest-grossing R-rated film in the US, at $370.8 million, a record which remained unbroken for 20 years.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/chart/mpaa_title_lifetime_gross/?by_mpaa=R |title=Top Lifetime Grosses by MPAA Rating — R |website=Box Office Mojo |access-date=2023-04-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230405041957/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/chart/mpaa_title_lifetime_gross/?by_mpaa=R |archive-date=2023-04-05 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Deadpool & Wolverine" /> It received three nominations at the ] in 2005, for ], ], and ].<ref>{{Citation|last=Gibson|first=Mel|title=The Passion of the Christ|date=February 25, 2004|url=https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0335345/awards?ref_=tt_awd|access-date=September 1, 2016|archive-date=January 28, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170128100933/http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0335345/awards?ref_=tt_awd|url-status=live}}</ref> A sequel is in development.
The film's dialogue is entirely in reconstructed ] and ] with vernacular ]. The film was a major commercial hit, grossing in excess of $600 million during its theatrical release, becoming the highest grossing non-English language film of all time.<ref name="BOM (alltime-world)">{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/world/ |title=All Time Worldwide Box Office Grosses |publisher=] |accessdate=2011-02-02}}</ref>


==Plot== ==Plot==
The film opens in ] as ] prays and is tempted by ], while his apostles, ], ] and ] sleep. After receiving thirty pieces of silver, one of Jesus' other apostles, ], approaches with the temple guards and betrays Jesus with a ]. As the guards move in to arrest Jesus, Peter cuts off the ear of ], but Jesus heals the ear. The temple guards arrest Jesus and the apostles flee. John tells ] and ] of the arrest. Peter follows Jesus at a distance. ] holds trial over the objection of some of the other priests, who are expelled from the court. When questioned by Caiaphas whether he is the son of God, Jesus replies "I AM." Caiaphas is horrified and tears his robes and Jesus is condemned to death for blasphemy. Three times Peter denies knowing Jesus but then runs away sobbing. Meanwhile, the remorseful Judas attempts to return the money to have Jesus freed but is refused by the priests. Tormented by demons, he flees the city and hangs himself with a rope he finds on a dead donkey. On the night of ] in ], ] ] beside his disciples ], ] and ]. ] tries to tempt Jesus as his sweat ] and a serpent emerges from Satan's guise; Jesus rebukes him by ]. Meanwhile, ], another of Jesus' disciples, is bribed by ] and the ] with ], and leads a group of temple guards to the forest where he ]. As the guards ], a fight erupts wherein Peter draws his dagger and slashes the ear of ], the commander of the guards. Jesus heals Malchus' injury and reprimands Peter. As the disciples flee, the guards secure Jesus and beat him on the way to the ] while a distraught Malchus remains behind.


Awoken from her sleep, Jesus' mother ] senses something is wrong and speaks with ]. John informs them of the arrest, and they reunite with Peter who has followed Jesus and his captors. Caiaphas ] during which false accusations are made against Jesus. Some priests, who object to the trial and secretly support Jesus, are expelled from the court. When Jesus claims he is the divine ], Caiaphas angrily tears his robes and Jesus is condemned to death for blasphemy. As Jesus is brutally beaten, Peter is confronted by the mob and he ] being a follower of Jesus. Remembering Jesus' precise prediction, he weeps bitterly and flees. Meanwhile, a guilt-ridden Judas attempts to return the money to have Jesus freed, but is refused by the priests. Judas then spits on the bag of silver and throws it at their feet and leaves. Haunted by demons throughout the night, he hangs himself outside ].
Caiaphas brings Jesus before ] to be condemned to death, but after questioning Jesus, Pilate sends him instead to the court of ], as Jesus is from Herod's ruling town of Nazareth. After Jesus is returned, Pilate offers the crowd that he will chastise Jesus and then will set him free. Pilate attempts to have Jesus freed by giving the people an option of freeing Jesus or the violent criminal ]. To Pilate's dismay, the crowd demands to have Barabbas freed and Jesus killed. In an attempt to appease the crowd, Pilate has Jesus brutally scourged and mocked with a crown of thorns, yet the crowd continues to demand that Jesus be crucified. Pilate reluctantly orders Jesus' crucifixion.


Caiaphas and the crowd bring Jesus before ], the Roman governor of ], to be condemned to death. At the urging of his wife ], who knows Jesus is holy, and ], Pilate finds no fault in him and transfers him to the court of ] since Jesus is from Antipas' domain of ]. Antipas deems him to be a harmless fool and returns him. Pilate then offers the crowd the choice of freeing Jesus or a convicted murderer named ]. The crowd demands Barabbas be freed and Jesus crucified. Attempting to appease the crowd, Pilate orders that Jesus simply be flogged. The Roman guards ] with staves and whips until the Captain of the Guard, Abenader, stops them, blasting the torturers for taking the punishment too far.
As Jesus carries the cross along the ] to ], ] wipes Jesus's face with her ]. ] is unwillingly pressed into carrying the cross with Jesus. Jesus is then ]. As he hangs from the cross, Jesus prays forgiveness for those who did this to him and redeems a ] crucified next to him. After Jesus gives up his spirit and dies, a single drop of rain falls from the sky, triggering an earthquake which destroys the Temple and rips the cloth covering the ] in two, to the horror of Caiaphas and the other priests. Satan is then shown screaming in defeat. The story ends with Jesus rising from the dead and exiting his tomb.

After Jesus is dragged off, Mother Mary and Mary Magdalene clean up Jesus and Magdalene reminisces on Jesus saving her from a stoning during her darkest time. The Roman guards take Jesus to a barn where they place a ] on his head and ]. He is presented before Pilate and the crowd, but Caiaphas, supported by the crowd, continues demanding that he be crucified. Unwilling to instigate an uprising, Pilate washes his hands and orders his crucifixion, claiming no responsibility.
Jesus then carries a ] on the ] to ] with two thieves, ] and ], following behind, while Satan observes his suffering sadistically. ], he is constantly harassed by the guards and rampant mob, is comforted by his mother momentarily before being dragged away the guards, is helped with carrying the cross by the unwilling ], and is replenished by ] who wipes his bloodied face with ] before also being dragged away like Mary. At Golgotha, with Mary, Magdalene, John, and others witnessing, ]. One of the thieves, Gesmas, mocks Jesus suggesting he get off that cross to prove that he is the Son of God. He ] to forgive his tormentors, provides salvation to Dismas who is crucified beside him for his strong faith and repentance, and comforts his mother. Succumbing to his wounds, Jesus surrenders his spirit and dies. A single droplet of rain then falls, triggering an earthquake which damages the ] and rips the veil covering the ] in two. Both the thieves' legs are broken by the Romans to speed up their passing, and upon seeing Jesus dead, the Roman guard ] is ordered to thrust a spear into Jesus to be sure. Cassius does just that and is hit with the blood. The Roman soldiers who mocked and beat Jesus flee in terror while Satan screams in defeat from the depths of Hell. Jesus' body is taken down from the cross and ]. Three days later, ] and exits the tomb.


==Cast== ==Cast==
{{Div col}}
{| cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" border="0" width="60%"
*] as ]
|-
** Andrea Refuto as Young Jesus
|valign="top" width="40%"|
* ] as ] *] as ]
* ] as ] *] as ]
* ] as ] *] as ]
* ] as ] *] as ]
*] as ]
* Francesco DeVito as ]
*] as ]
* Chokri Ben Zagden as ]
* Christo Jivkov as ] *] as ]
* ] as ] *] as ]
* ] as ] *] as ]
*] as Abenader
* ] as ]
*Giacinto Ferro as ]
* Fabio Sartor as ]
*Olek Mincer as ]
* ] as ]
*Sheila Mokhtari as Woman in audience
* ] as ]
*] as ]
|valign="top" width="40%"|
*Roberto Bestazoni as ]
* Toni Bertorelli as ]
* Jarreth Merz as ] *] as ]
*Giovanni Capalbo as ]
* ] as ]
* ] as ] *] as ]
*] as Scornful Roman
* Giovanni Capalbo as ]
*Lello Giulivo as Brutish Roman
* Roberto Bestazoni as ]
*Abel Jafry as 2nd Temple officer
* Sabrina Impacciatore as ]
* Pietro Sarubbi as ] *Jarreth Merz as ]
*Rossella Vetrano as ]
* ] as ]
*Matt Patresi as ]
* ] as Scornful Roman
* Roberto Visconti as Scornful Roman *Roberto Visconti as Scornful Roman
*] as ]
* Lello Giulivo as Brutish Roman
*Chokri Ben Zagden as ]
* Abel Jafry as 2nd Temple Officer
*] as ]
|}
*] as ]
*] as Chief Elder
{{Div col end}}

{{notelist}}


==Themes== ==Themes==
In ''The Passion: Photography from the Movie "The Passion of the Christ"'', Gibson says: "This is a movie about love, hope, faith and forgiveness. He died for all mankind, suffered for all of us. It's time to get back to that basic message. The world has gone nuts. We could all use a little more love, faith, hope and forgiveness." In ''The Passion: Photography from the Movie "The Passion of the Christ"'', director Mel Gibson says, "This is a movie about love, hope, faith and forgiveness. Jesus died for all mankind, suffered for all of us. It's time to get back to that basic message. The world has gone nuts. We could all use a little more love, faith, hope and forgiveness."

He also explains one of his appearances in the film, the close-up of his hands nailing Jesus to the cross: "It was me that put Him on the cross. It was my sins ."


==Source material== ==Source material==
===New Testament===
According to director ], the primary source material for ''The Passion of the Christ'' is the four ] narratives of Christ's ]. The film also draws from other parts of the ]. The line spoken by Jesus, "Behold Mother, I make all things new," is taken from the ].<ref>{{cite book
| title = The Holy Bible, Book of Revelation 21:5 | url=http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation%2021:5;&version=31}}</ref>


===Hebrew Bible=== ===Biblical canon===
''The Passion of the Christ'' also refers to the ]. The film begins with an ] from the ] from ].<ref>{{cite book | title=The Holy Bible, Book of Isaiah 53:5 | url=http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%2053:5;&version=31}}</ref> In the opening scene set in the ], Jesus crushes a serpent's head in direct visual allusion to ] 3:15.<ref>{{cite book | title=The Holy Bible, Book of Genesis 3:15 | url=http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%203:15;&version=31}}</ref> Throughout the film, Jesus quotes from the ], beyond the instances recorded in the ]. According to Mel Gibson, the primary source material for ''The Passion of the Christ'' is the four ] narratives of Christ's ]. The film includes a trial of ], which is only found in the ]. The film also draws from other parts of the ]. One line spoken by Jesus in the film, "I make all things new", is found in the ], Chapter 21, verse 5.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Holy Bible, Book of Revelation 21:5|url=http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation%2021:5;&version=31|access-date=October 16, 2008|archive-date=August 16, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090816162228/http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation%2021:5;&version=31|url-status=live}}</ref>

The film also refers to the ]. The film begins with an ] from the ] from ].<ref>{{cite book | title=The Holy Bible, Book of Isaiah 53:5 | url=http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%2053:5;&version=31 | access-date=November 4, 2008 | archive-date=August 15, 2009 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090815002408/http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%2053:5;&version=31 | url-status=live }}</ref> In the opening scene set in the ], Jesus crushes a serpent's head in direct visual allusion to ].<ref>{{cite book | title=The Holy Bible, Book of Genesis 3:15 | url=http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%203:15;&version=31 | access-date=November 17, 2005 | archive-date=August 16, 2009 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090816152847/http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%203:15;&version=31 | url-status=live }}</ref> Throughout the film, Jesus quotes from the ], beyond the instances recorded in the ].


===Traditional iconography and stories=== ===Traditional iconography and stories===
Many of the depictions in ''The Passion of the Christ'' deliberately mirror traditional representations of the ] in art. For example, the fourteen ] are central to the depiction of the ] in ''The Passion of the Christ.'' All of the stations are portrayed except for the eighth station (Jesus meets the women of ], a deleted scene on the DVD) and the fourteenth station (Jesus is laid in the tomb). Gibson was also visually inspired by the representation of Jesus on the ].<ref name="Urbancinefile" >{{cite web Many of the depictions in the film deliberately mirror traditional representations of the ] in art. For example, the 14 ] are central to the depiction of the ] in ''The Passion of the Christ.'' All the stations are portrayed except for the eighth station (Jesus meets the women of Jerusalem, a deleted scene on the DVD) and the fourteenth station (Jesus is laid in the tomb). Gibson was inspired by the representation of Jesus on the ].<ref name="Urbancinefile" >{{cite web | last = Cooney Carrillo | first = Jenny | title = The Passion of Mel | publisher = Urbancinefile | date = February 26, 2004 | url = http://www.urbancinefile.com.au/home/view.asp?a=8559&s=Interviews | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20040601072421/http://www.urbancinefile.com.au/home/view.asp?a=8559&s=Interviews | url-status = dead | archive-date = June 1, 2004 }}</ref>
| last = Cooney Carrillo
| first = Jenny
| title = The Passion of Mel
| publisher = Urbancinefile
| date = 2004-02-26
| url = http://www.urbancinefile.com.au/home/view.asp?a=8559&s=Interviews }}</ref>

At the suggestion of actress ], the ] is quoted early in the film. ] asks "Why is this night different than other nights?", and ] replies with the traditional response: "Because once we were slaves and we are slaves no longer".<ref>{{cite news
| last = Abramowitz
| first = Rachel
| title = Along came Mary; Mel Gibson was sold on Maia Morgenstern for 'Passion' at first sight
| publisher = ]
| date = 2004-03-07
| url = http://articles.latimes.com/2004/mar/07/entertainment/ca-encounter7}}</ref>

The conflation of ] with the ] by Jesus has some precedent in tradition but according to the director was done for ]. The names of some of the characters in the film are traditional and extra-Scriptural, such as the thieves crucified alongside the Christ, ] and Gesmas (also ]).


At the suggestion of actress ], the ] is quoted early in the film. Mary asks "Why is this night different from other nights?", and Mary Magdalene replies with the traditional response: "Because once we were slaves, and we are slaves no longer."<ref>{{cite news |last=Abramowitz |first=Rachel |date=March 7, 2004 |title=Along came Mary; Mel Gibson was sold on Maia Morgenstern for 'Passion' at first sight |newspaper=] |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-mar-07-ca-encounter7-story.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314060007/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-mar-07-ca-encounter7-story.html |archive-date=2023-03-14}}</ref>
===Catholic devotional writings===
Screenwriters ] and ] said that they read many accounts of Christ's ] for inspiration, including the devotional writings of ] mystics. A principal source is ''The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ''<ref name=dolorous>{{cite book | url=http://www.jesus-passion.com/DOLOROUS_PASSION_OF_OUR_LORD_JESUS_CHRIST.htm | title=The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ | author=Clement Brentano}}</ref> the reported (yet disputed) visions of the ] German nun ] (1774–1824), as written by to the poet ].<ref name=Corl /><ref name=Dimare /><ref>''Mel Gibson's Passion and philosophy'' by Jorge J. E. Gracia 2004 ISBN 0812695712 page 145</ref> A careful reading of Emmerich's book shows the film's high level of dependence on it.<ref name=Corl >''Jesus and Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ'' by Kathleen E. Corley, Robert Leslie Webb 2004 ISBN 082647781X pages 160-161</ref><ref name=Garcia >''Mel Gibson's Passion and philosophy'' by Jorge J. E. Gracia 2004 ISBN 0812695712 page 145</ref><ref>''Movies in American History: An Encyclopedia'' edited by Philip C. DiMare 2011 ISBN 159884296X page 909</ref>


The conflation of Mary Magdalene with the ] by Jesus has some precedent in Catholic tradition, and according to the director was done for dramatic reasons. The names of some characters in the film are traditional and extra-Scriptural, such as the thieves crucified alongside the Christ, ] and Gesmas (also ]).
However, ]'s attribution of the book ''The Dolorous Passion'' to Emmerich has been subject to dispute, with allegations that Brentano wrote much of the book himself; a Vatican investigation concluding that: "It is absolutely not certain that she ever wrote this".<ref name=CNSFeb2004 >John Thavis, ''Catholic News Service'' February 4, 2004: "Vatican confirms papal plans to beatify nun who inspired Gibson film" </ref><ref name=CNSOct2004 >John Thavis, ''Catholic News Service'' October 4, 2004: "Pope beatifies five, including German nun who inspired Gibson film" </ref><ref name=Anvil >Emmerich, Anne Catherine, and Clemens Brentano. ''The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ''. Anvil Publishers, Georgia, 2005 pages 49-56</ref> In his review of the movie in the catholic publication '']'', ] priest John O' Malley used the terms "devout fiction" and "well-intentioned fraud" to refer to the writings of Clemens Brentano.<ref name=America /><ref name=Anvil />


The film also took some inspiration from visions from ] visionaries such as ] and ]. '']'', a book by ] that details the visions of Anne Catherine Emmerich, was particularly inspiring to Gibson because it provided vivid descriptions of the crucifixion, as well as additional roles played by Mary, Jesus' mother.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bacon |first=Thomas |date=2020-04-11 |title=Passion of the Christ: Every Scene NOT From The Bible (& Why They Were Included) |url=https://screenrant.com/passion-christ-movie-scenes-not-bible-reason/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314055552/https://screenrant.com/passion-christ-movie-scenes-not-bible-reason/ |archive-date=2023-03-14 |access-date=2023-01-11 |website=] |language=en}}</ref>
Among the many elements taken from the Dolorous Passion are scenes such as the suspension of Jesus from a bridge after his arrest by the Temple guards, the torment of Judas by demons after he had handed over Jesus to the Sanhedrin, the wiping up of the blood of Jesus after his scourging, and the dislocation of Jesus’ shoulder so that his palm would reach the hole bored for the nail.<ref name=dolorous /> A second source mentioned was ''The Mystical City of God'' by ] (1602–1665), a 17th-century Spanish nun.{{Citation needed|date=August 2011}}


The depiction of ] wiping the face of Jesus is from a Catholic tradition and relates to a relic known as the ]. The film slightly showed the veil bearing the image of the face of Jesus. Its origin lies in the sixth Station of the Cross, in which Saint Veronica wipes Jesus's face with her veil after he encounters her along the Via Dolorosa to Calvary.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Petty |first=Michael John |date=2022-05-13 |title=The Passion Of The Christ Scenes That Aren't In The Bible |url=https://www.looper.com/862656/the-passion-of-the-christ-scenes-that-arent-in-the-bible/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314055854/https://www.looper.com/862656/the-passion-of-the-christ-scenes-that-arent-in-the-bible/ |archive-date=2023-03-14 |access-date=2022-11-07 |website=Looper |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Sixth Station, Way of the Cross 2011 |url=https://www.vatican.va/news_services/liturgy/2011/via_crucis/en/station_06.html |access-date=2023-01-11 |website=www.vatican.va |archive-date=December 9, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221209223606/https://www.vatican.va/news_services/liturgy/2011/via_crucis/en/station_06.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
==Differences from traditional Passion story==
Certain elements of ''The Passion of the Christ'' do not have precedent in earlier depictions of the ]. In the ] scene at the beginning of the movie, Satan appears and attempts to distract Jesus while he is praying. Jesus then crushes a serpent beneath his heel (this is a reference to the protoevangelium, Genesis 3:15 – a prophecy of Messiah); this does not occur in any of the gospels. In another example, ] is tormented by demons who appear as children to him. The film gives focus to the fragile relationship of ] with ] through Pilate's discussion with ] about imperial orders to avert further Judean revolts. The movie clearly identifies ] as Jewish, although the ] provide only his name and place of origin. In the film, a Roman soldier derides Simon (who helps Jesus bear the cross) by derisively calling him ''Jew''. In contrast, Simon is described as a pagan in ''The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ''.<ref name=dolorous />

Other scenes unique to ''The Passion of the Christ'' include the one in which the crucified thief who taunted Jesus has his eye pecked out by a crow, and the flashback of the carpenter Jesus building an elevated, four-legged table for a ]. The scene of Satan carrying a demonic baby during Christ’s flogging has been construed as an imitation of traditional depictions of the ]. Mel Gibson described this scene as follows:
<blockquote>"...it's evil distorting what’s good. What is more tender and beautiful than a mother and a child? So the Devil takes that and distorts it just a little bit. Instead of a normal mother and child you have an androgynous figure holding a 40-year-old ‘baby’ with hair on his back. It is weird, it is shocking, it's almost too much – just like turning Jesus over to continue scourging him on his chest is shocking and almost too much, which is the exact moment when this appearance of the Devil and the baby takes place."<ref>{{cite news
| last = Moring
| first = Mark
| title = What's Up With the Ugly Baby?
| publisher = '']''
|date=2004-03-01
| url = http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/news/040301-passion.html
| accessdate = 2008-08-20 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080709113146/http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/news/040301-passion.html |archivedate = July 9, 2008}}</ref></blockquote>


==Production== ==Production==
===Script and language=== ===Script and language===
Gibson originally announced that he would use two ] without subtitles and rely on "filmic storytelling." Because the story of the ] is so well-known, Gibson felt the need to avoid ] languages in order to surprise audiences: "I think it's almost counterproductive to say some of these things in a ]. It makes you want to stand up and shout out the next line, like when you hear 'To be or not to be' and you instinctively say to yourself, 'That is the question.'"<ref>{{cite news | url= http://www.zenit.org/article-6723?l=english| title= Mel Gibson’s Great Passion| publisher=Zenit | date=2003-03-06}}</ref> The script was written in ] by Gibson and ], then ] by ], S.J., a professor at ], into ], reconstructed ], and ]. Gibson chose to use ] instead of ], which was the "lingua franca" of that particular part of the ] at the time, so that the audience could easily distinguish between the sound of Italianate ] and Semitic ].<ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.ntgateway.com/weblog/2004/11/sbl-passion-of-christ-interview-fulco.html| title= SBL Passion of the Christ interview – Fulco and Fitzgerald| author= Mark Goodacre| publisher=NT Gateway Weblog | date=November 26, 2004}}</ref> Fulco sometimes incorporated deliberate errors in pronunciations and word endings when the characters were speaking a language unfamiliar to them, and some of the crude language used by the Roman soldiers was not translated in the subtitles.<ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.languagehat.com/archives/001196.php| title= TRANSLATING THE PASION| publisher=Language Hat | date=March 8, 2004}}</ref> The pronunciation of Latin in the film is closer to ecclesiastical Latin than to "more historically accurate" classical Latin. (Clear instances of this can be heard when Pontius Pilate says "veritas" and "ecce".) Mel Gibson originally announced that he would use two ] without subtitles and rely on "filmic storytelling". Because the story of the ] is so well known, Gibson felt the need to avoid vernacular languages in order to surprise audiences: "I think it's almost counterproductive to say some of these things in a modern language. It makes you want to stand up and shout out the next line, like when you hear 'To be or not to be' and you instinctively say to yourself, 'That is the question.'"<ref name="Zenit interview 2003">{{cite news|url=http://www.zenit.org/article-6723?l=english| title=Mel Gibson's great passion: Christ's agony as you've never seen it|publisher=]|date=March 6, 2003|access-date=October 17, 2019|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090815141913/http://www.zenit.org/article-6723?l=english|archive-date=August 15, 2009}}</ref> The script was written in English by Gibson and ], then ] by ], S.J., a professor at Loyola Marymount University, into Latin and reconstructed Aramaic. Fulco sometimes incorporated deliberate errors in pronunciations and word endings when the characters were speaking a language unfamiliar to them, and some of the crude language used by the Roman soldiers was not translated in the subtitles.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.languagehat.com/archives/001196.php|title=Translating the passion|publisher=Language Hat|date=March 8, 2004|access-date=November 21, 2008|archive-date=May 22, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120522043726/http://www.languagehat.com/archives/001196.php|url-status=live}}</ref>


===Filming=== ===Filming===
], Italy]]
The film was produced ] and filmed in ] – primarily at ] in ], and in the old city of ], and at ] (]). The estimated ]30 million production cost, plus an additional estimated $15 million in marketing costs, were fully borne by Gibson and his company, ]. It was released on ], February 25, 2004. It was rated R by the ] for "sequences of graphic violence". ] distributed the theatrical version of the film, and ] distributed the VHS/DVD/Blu-ray version of the film.
The film was produced independently and shot in Italy at ] in Rome, and on location in the city of ] and the ghost town of ], both in the ] region. The estimated US$30 million production cost, plus an additional estimated $15 million in marketing costs, were fully borne by Gibson and his company ]. According to the DVD special feature, ] had recently finished his film '']'', from which Gibson and his production designers constructed part of their set. This saved Gibson a lot of time and money.


Gibson consulted several theological advisers during filming, including ], and a local priest, Philip J. Ryan, who visited the set daily to provide counsel, ], and ] to ]. Masses were celebrated for cast and crew in several locations.<ref>{{cite book|title=Sede Vacante: The Life and Legacy of Archbishop Thuc|first=Edward|last=Jarvis|author-link=Edward Jarvis (author)|year=2018|publisher=The Apocryphile Press|location=Berkeley CA|isbn=978-1949643022|pages=13–14}}</ref> There were other priests involved with the filming, including Abbé Michel Debourges from the ], Stephen Somerville, and Jean-Marie Charles-Roux, all of whom were asked by Mel Gibson to daily celebrate the ].<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://maryssecretary.com/2021/05/24/latin-mass-on-set-of-the-passion-of-the-christ/ |title=Latin Mass on Set of the Passion of the Christ |date=May 24, 2021 |access-date=March 1, 2024 |archive-date=June 9, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230609152920/https://maryssecretary.com/2021/05/24/latin-mass-on-set-of-the-passion-of-the-christ/ |url-status=live }}</ref> During filming, key set production assistant Jan Michelini was struck twice by lightning and hence nicknamed "Lighting Boy" as seen in the credits. Minutes later, Caviezel also was struck.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Susman|first=Gary|title=Charged Performance|url=https://ew.com/article/2003/10/24/mel-gibsons-jesus-struck-lightning/|access-date=March 31, 2013|magazine=]|date=October 24, 2003|archive-date=May 25, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130525182358/http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,525927,00.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Ross|first=Scott|title=Behind the Scenes of 'The Passion' with Jim Caviezel|date=March 28, 2008|url=http://www.cbn.com/700club/guests/interviews/scottross-jim_caviezel_2.aspx|access-date=March 31, 2013|archive-date=June 2, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230602180336/https://www.cbn.com/700club/guests/interviews/scottross-jim_caviezel_2.aspx|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="bbc-lightning">{{cite news|title=Jesus actor struck by lightning|work=]|date=October 23, 2003|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3209223.stm|access-date=April 14, 2013|archive-date=September 17, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070917055711/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3209223.stm|url-status=live}}</ref>
Gibson consulted several theological advisors during filming, including ], who would later go on to become a news analyst and contributor. During filming, assistant director Jan Michelini was struck twice by ]. The second time this happened, the lightning bolt also hit ].<ref>{{cite news | url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3209223.stm| title= Jesus actor struck by lightning | publisher=BBC | date=23 October 2003}}</ref>


===Music=== ===Music===
{{main|The Passion of the Christ (soundtrack)}}
Three ]s were released with ]'s co-operation: (i) the ] of ]'s original orchestral score conducted by ]; (ii) '']'', by producers ] and Tim Cook, with original compositions by various artists, and (iii) ''The Passion of the Christ: Songs Inspired By''. The first two albums each received a ], and the soundtrack received an ] nomination of ].
Three albums were released with ]'s co-operation: (1) the soundtrack of ]'s original orchestral score conducted by ]; (2) '']'', by producers ] and Tim Cook, with original compositions by various artists, and (3) ''Songs Inspired by The Passion of the Christ''. The first two albums each received a ], and the soundtrack received an ] nomination of ]. The music score frequently makes use of the ] technique.<ref name=salon>{{cite web|url=https://www.salon.com/2004/05/25/wails/|title=Wail watching|author=Dave Roos|website=]|date=May 25, 2004|access-date=April 22, 2023|archive-date=April 30, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230430225350/https://www.salon.com/2004/05/25/wails/|url-status=live}}</ref>


A preliminary score was composed and recorded by ] and ], but was incomplete at film's release. ] was the primary musical researcher and one of the composers;<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.jacklenz.com/index.htm | title= Jack Lenz Bio | publisher=JackLenz.com}}</ref> several clips of his compositions have been posted online.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.jacklenz.com/clips.htm |title=Clips of Musical Compositions by Jack Lenz | publisher=JackLenz.com}}</ref> A preliminary score was composed and recorded by ] and ], but was incomplete at film's release. ] was the primary musical researcher and one of the composers;<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jacklenz.com/index.htm|title=Jack Lenz Bio|publisher=JackLenz.com|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017050224/http://www.jacklenz.com/index.htm|archive-date=October 17, 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> several clips of his compositions have been posted online.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jacklenz.com/clips.htm|title=Clips of Musical Compositions by Jack Lenz|publisher=JackLenz.com|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017050224/http://www.jacklenz.com/clips.htm|archive-date=October 17, 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref>


==Post-production==
===Title change=== ===Title change===
Although Gibson wanted to call his film ''The Passion'', on October 16, 2003 his spokesman announced that the title used in the United States would be ''The Passion of Christ'' because ] had already registered the title ''The Passion'' with the ] for the 1987 novel by ].<ref>{{cite web Although Mel Gibson wanted to call his film ''The Passion'', on October 16, 2003, his spokesman announced that the title used in the United States would be ''The Passion of Christ'' because ] had already registered the title ''The Passion'' with the ] for the 1987 novel by ].<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Susman|first=Gary|title=Napoleon Branding|magazine=]|date=October 16, 2004|url=https://ew.com/article/2003/10/16/mel-gibson-forced-rename-passion/|access-date=August 16, 2008|archive-date=December 22, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081222221926/http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,519051,00.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Later, the title was changed again to ''The Passion of the Christ'' for all markets.
| last = Susman
| first = Gary
| title = Napoleon Branding
| publisher = “Entertainment Weekly”
| date = 2004-10-16
| url = http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,519051,00.html
| accessdate =2008-08-16 }}</ref> Later, the title was changed again to ''The Passion of the Christ'' for all markets.


===Distribution and marketing=== ===Distribution and marketing===
Gibson began production on his film without securing outside funding or distribution. In 2002, he explained why he could not get backing from the Hollywood studios: "This is a film about something that nobody wants to touch, shot in two dead languages. In ] they think I am insane, and maybe I am."<ref>{{cite news | url= http://www.allbusiness.com/services/motion-pictures/4866159-1.html| title= Gibson To Direct Christ Tale With Caviezel As Star| author= Nick Vivarelli| publisher=The Hollywood Reporter | date=2002-09-23| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref> Gibson and his ] company provided the film's sole backing, spending about $30 million on production costs and an estimated $15 million on marketing.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.forbes.com/business/2004/03/03/cx_pp_0303mel.html | title=What Mel's Passion Will Earn Him | publisher=Forbes.com | date=2004-03-03 | last=Patsuris | first=Penelope}}</ref> After early accusations of anti-Semitism, it became difficult for Gibson to find an American distribution company. ] had a first-look deal with Icon and passed on the film in response to public protests.<ref name=FOXpass>{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/2003/aug/30/entertainment/et-quick30.2| title= Fox passes on Gibson’s ‘The Passion’| publisher=Los Angeles Times | date=2004-10-22| accessdate=2008-08-30}}</ref> In order to avoid the spectacle of other studios turning down the film and to avoid subjecting the distributor to the same intense public criticism he had received, Gibson decided to distribute the movie in the United States himself, with ].<ref>{{cite news | url= http://articles.latimes.com/2003/oct/22/business/fi-mel22| title= Gibson to Market ‘Christ’ on His Own, Sources Say| last=Horn | first=John| publisher=Los Angeles Times | date=2004-10-22| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref> Gibson began production on his film without securing outside funding or distribution. In 2002, he explained why he could not get backing from the Hollywood studios: "This is a film about something that nobody wants to touch, shot in two dead languages."<ref>{{cite news| url= http://www.allbusiness.com/services/motion-pictures/4866159-1.html| title= Gibson To Direct Christ Tale With Caviezel As Star| first= Nick| last= Vivarelli| work= The Hollywood Reporter| date= September 23, 2002| access-date= October 20, 2008| archive-date= August 15, 2009| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090815002751/http://www.allbusiness.com/services/motion-pictures/4866159-1.html| url-status= live}}</ref> Gibson and his company Icon Productions provided the film's sole backing, spending about $30 million on production costs and an estimated $15 million on marketing.<ref>{{cite magazine | url=https://www.forbes.com/2004/03/03/cx_pp_0303mel.html | title=What Mel's Passion Will Earn Him | magazine=Forbes.com | date=March 3, 2004 | last=Patsuris | first=Penelope | access-date=August 18, 2017 | archive-date=June 8, 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240608212242/https://www.forbes.com/2004/03/03/cx_pp_0303mel.html | url-status=live }}</ref> After early accusations of ], it became difficult for Gibson to find an American distribution company. 20th Century Fox initially had a first-look deal with Icon but decided to pass on the film in response to public protests.<ref name=FOXpass>{{cite news| url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2003-aug-30-et-quick30.2-story.html| title=Fox passes on Gibson's 'The Passion'| newspaper=Los Angeles Times| date=October 22, 2004| access-date=August 30, 2008| archive-date=June 8, 2024| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240608212242/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2003-aug-30-et-quick30.2-story.html| url-status=live}}</ref> In order to avoid the spectacle of other studios turning down the film and to avoid subjecting the distributor to the same intense public criticism he had received, Gibson decided to distribute the film in the United States himself, with the aid of independent distributor ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2003-oct-22-fi-mel22-story.html|title=Gibson to Market 'Christ' on His Own, Sources Say|last=Horn|first=John|work=]|date=October 22, 2004|access-date=October 20, 2008|archive-date=December 24, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081224075210/http://articles.latimes.com/2003/oct/22/business/fi-mel22|url-status=live}}</ref> Gibson handled the distribution and marketing on his own, whilst Newmarket assisted with shipping prints of the film and collecting the revenue from theaters.


Gibson departed from the usual film marketing formula. He employed a small-scale television advertising campaign, and added faith guru ] with no press junkets.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4374411 | title=Marketing 'The Passion of the Christ' | publisher=MSNBC.com | last=Cobb | first=Jerry | date=2004-02-25}}</ref> Yet ''The Passion of the Christ'' was heavily promoted by many church groups, both within their organizations and to the general public, often giving away free tickets.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.usask.ca/relst/jrpc/art8-melgibsonmarketing.html | title=Mel Gibson's The Passion Of The Christ: Market Segmentation, Mass Marketing and Promotion, and the Internet | publisher=The Journal of Religion and Popular Culture | last=Maresco | first=Peter A. | date=Fall 2004}}</ref> Gibson departed from the usual film marketing formula. He employed a small-scale television advertising campaign with no press junkets.<ref name="msnbc-cobb">{{cite web |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/4374411 |title=Marketing 'The Passion of the Christ' |publisher=NBC News |last=Cobb |first=Jerry |date=February 25, 2004 |access-date=April 16, 2020 |archive-date=March 4, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180304232732/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/4374411 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Similar to marketing campaigns for earlier biblical films like '']'', ''The Passion of the Christ'' was heavily promoted by many church groups, both within their organizations and to the public. Typical licensed merchandise like posters, T-shirts, coffee mugs and jewelry was sold through retailers and websites.<ref name="maresco">{{cite web|url=https://www.usask.ca/relst/jrpc/art8-melgibsonmarketing.html |title=Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ: Market Segmentation, Mass Marketing and Promotion, and the Internet |publisher=] |last=Maresco |first=Peter A. |date=Fall 2004 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080705045347/http://www.usask.ca/relst/jrpc/art8-melgibsonmarketing.html |archive-date=July 5, 2008 }}</ref> The ] stated that many of its members, like other Christians, felt that the film was a good way to evangelize non-believers.<ref name="UMNS">{{cite web|url = http://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?ptid=1&mid=3316|title = Many churches look to 'Passion' as evangelism tool|publisher = ]|access-date = June 7, 2009|archive-date = April 7, 2022|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20220407080927/http://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?ptid=1&mid=3316|url-status = live}}</ref> As a result, many congregations planned to be at the theaters, and some set up tables to answer questions and share prayers.<ref name="UMNS"/> Rev. John Tanner, pastor of Cove United Methodist Church in Hampton Cove, Alabama, said: "They feel the film presents a unique opportunity to share Christianity in a way today's public can identify with."<ref name="UMNS"/> The ] also expressed a similar endorsement of the picture.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://news.adventist.org/en/all-news/news/go/2004-02-23/ann-news-analysis-adventists-and-the-passion-of-the-christ/ |title=ANN News Analysis: Adventists and "The Passion of the Christ", Adventist News Network, 23 February 2004 |access-date=July 6, 2019 |archive-date=July 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190706232735/https://news.adventist.org/en/all-news/news/go/2004-02-23/ann-news-analysis-adventists-and-the-passion-of-the-christ/ |url-status=live }}</ref> More than a dozen Catholic bishops and cardinals issued statements praising the film.<ref></ref>

===Evangelical support===
''The Passion of the Christ'' received enthusiastic support from the American ] community.<ref name="pauley">{{cite book|last1=Pauley |first1=John L. |last2=King |first2=Amy |editor-first=Robert H. |editor-last=Woods |title=Evangelical Christians and Popular Culture |volume=1 |publisher=Praeger Publishing |location=Westport |date=2013 |pages=36–51 |isbn=978-0313386541}}</ref> Before the film's release, Gibson actively reached out to evangelical leaders seeking their support and feedback.<ref name="pauley-38">Pawley, p. 38.</ref> With their help, Gibson organized and attended a series of pre-release screenings for evangelical audiences and discussed the making of the film and his personal faith. In June 2003 he screened the film for 800 pastors attending a leadership conference at ], pastored by ], then president of the ].<ref name="pauley-40">Pawley, p. 40.</ref> Gibson gave similar showings at ]'s ], ]'s ], and to 3,600 pastors at a conference at ]'s ] in Lake Forest.<ref name="pauley-40-41">Pawley, pp. 40–41.</ref>

From the summer of 2003 to the film's release in February 2004, portions or rough cuts of the film were shown to over eighty audiences—many of which were evangelical audiences.<ref name="pauley-41">Pauley, p. 41.</ref> The film additionally received public endorsements from evangelical leaders, including Rick Warren, ], ], ], '']'' editor David Neff, ], ], ], ], ] and ].<ref name="pauley-41"/><ref name="fredriksen">{{cite book|last=Fredriksen |first=Paula |title=On 'The Passion of the Christ': Exploring the Issues Raised by the Controversial Movie |publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley |year=2006 |isbn=978-0520248533}}{{page needed|date=October 2020}}</ref>


==Release== ==Release==
===Box office and theatrical run===
===Domestic release===
''The Passion of the Christ'' opened in the United States on February 25, 2004 (], the beginning of ]). It earned $83.8 million from 4,793 screens at 3,043 theaters in its opening weekend and a total of $125.2 million since its Wednesday opening, ranking it fourth overall in domestic opening weekend earnings for 2004 as well as the biggest weekend debut for a February release (until '']'' was released). The film tied with '']''{{'}}s record for having the highest five-day Wednesday opening. Moreover, ''The Passion of the Christ'' scored the second biggest opening weekend for any R-rated movie, behind '']''.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Susman|first=Gary|title=''Passion'' ties record with $125 million take records|url=https://ew.com/article/2004/03/02/passion-ties-record-125-million-take/|magazine=Entertainment Weekly|access-date=March 22, 2022|date=March 2, 2004|archive-date=March 23, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220323024733/https://ew.com/article/2004/03/02/passion-ties-record-125-million-take/|url-status=live}}</ref> It went on to earn $370.8 million overall in the United States,<ref name="BOM"/> and remained the highest grossing ] film in the domestic market (U.S. & Canada) for 20 years, before the record went to '']'' in 2024 with a domestic gross of $395.6 million.<ref name="Deadpool & Wolverine">{{cite news |last1=Coyle |first1=Jake |title=With a $97M second weekend, 'Deadpool & Wolverine' sets a new high mark for R-rated films |url=https://apnews.com/article/deadpool-wolverine-box-office-trap-shyamalan-f6d810c4de19c78c4875ccc8728b6960 |access-date=4 August 2024 |work=Associated Press News}}</ref><ref name="Mojo R-rated gross"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191022122046/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/domestic/mpaa.htm?page=R&p=.htm |date=October 22, 2019 }} ''Box Office Mojo''. Retrieved October 12, 2019.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/nickdesantis/2016/02/22/deadpool-box-office-on-pace-to-dethrone-passion-of-the-christ-as-top-grossing-r-rated-movie-of-all-time/#42208c65758f|title='Deadpool' Box Office On Pace To Dethrone 'Passion Of The Christ' As Top-Grossing R-Rated Movie Of All Time|first=Nick|last=DeSantis|work=]|date=February 22, 2016|access-date=February 23, 2016|archive-date=February 25, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160225091020/http://www.forbes.com/sites/nickdesantis/2016/02/22/deadpool-box-office-on-pace-to-dethrone-passion-of-the-christ-as-top-grossing-r-rated-movie-of-all-time/?#42208c65758f|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="TTT">{{cite web|url=https://deadline.com/2016/02/deadpool-gods-of-egypt-eddie-the-eagle-triple-9-box-office-1201709751/|title=Powerless Versus 'Deadpool', 'Gods of Egypt' Is First 2016 Big-Budget Bomb: Saturday AM B.O. Update|first=Anthony|last=D'Alessandro|website=]|date=February 27, 2016|access-date=February 28, 2016|archive-date=July 3, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170703093601/http://deadline.com/2016/02/deadpool-gods-of-egypt-eddie-the-eagle-triple-9-box-office-1201709751/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/box-office-deadpool-entombs-big-870611|title=Box Office: 'Deadpool' Entombs Big-Budget Bomb 'Gods of Egypt' to Stay No. 1|first=Pamela|last=McClintock|work=The Hollywood Reporter|date=February 28, 2016|access-date=February 28, 2016|archive-date=February 29, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160229081001/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/box-office-deadpool-entombs-big-870611|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/box-office-zootopia-defeats-deadpool-873000|title=Box Office: 'Zootopia' Defeats 'Deadpool' With Record $73.7M|first=Pamela|last=McClintock|work=]|date=March 6, 2016|access-date=March 7, 2016|archive-date=July 13, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170713191817/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/box-office-zootopia-defeats-deadpool-873000|url-status=live}}</ref> The film sold an estimated 59.6 million tickets in the US in its initial theatrical run.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=passionofthechrist.htm&adjust_yr=1&p=.htm|title=''The Passion of the Christ'' (2004): domestic total estimated tickets|website=]|access-date=May 30, 2016|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190204065734/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=passionofthechrist.htm&adjust_yr=1&p=.htm|archive-date=2019-02-04}}</ref>
The film opened in the ] on February 25, 2004 (], the beginning of ]). It earned $83,848,082 in its opening weekend, ranking it 4th overall in domestic opening weekend earnings for 2004. It went on to earn $370,782,930 overall in the United States.<ref name="BOM">{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=passionofthechrist.htm |title=The Passion of the Christ (2004) |publisher=] |accessdate=2009-02-05}}</ref>

In the Philippines, a majority-Catholic country, the film was released on March 31, 2004,<ref>{{cite news|title='The Passion of the Christ': "A milestone in the cinema history"|url=http://www.asianews.it/news-en/%27The-Passion-of-the-Christ%27%3A-A-milestone-in-the-cinema-history-000599.html|access-date=April 2, 2021|work=Asia News|publisher=PIME Onlus – AsiaNews|date=April 7, 2004|archive-date=October 23, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211023220718/http://www.asianews.it/news-en/%27The-Passion-of-the-Christ%27%3A-A-milestone-in-the-cinema-history-000599.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=The Passion Of The Christ Goes International|url=https://www.worldpress.org/Americas/1860.cfm|access-date=April 2, 2021|work=Worldpress.org|date=May 2004|quote=A Philippine student shows a pirated DVD copy of ''The Passion of the Christ'', which opened in local theaters, March 31, 2004.|archive-date=May 9, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210509012058/https://www.worldpress.org/Americas/1860.cfm|url-status=live}}</ref> rated PG-13 by the ] (MTRCB)<ref>{{cite news|last=Flores|first=Wilson Lee|title=Mel Gibson's 'Passion' is powerful, disturbing work of art|url=https://www.philstar.com/lifestyle/arts-and-culture/2004/03/29/244365/mel-gibson146s-145passion146-powerful-disturbing-work-art|access-date=April 2, 2021|work=]|publisher=Philstar Global Corp.|date=March 29, 2004|location=], Germany|archive-date=April 25, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230425234846/https://www.philstar.com/lifestyle/arts-and-culture/2004/03/29/244365/mel-gibson146s-145passion146-powerful-disturbing-work-art|url-status=live}}</ref> and endorsed by the ] (CBCP).<ref>{{cite news|last=Aravilla|first=Jose|title=Bishops endorse Mel Gibson film|url=https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2004/03/11/242128/bishops-endorse-mel-gibson-film/amp/|access-date=April 2, 2021|work=]|publisher=Philstar Global Corp.|date=March 11, 2004|archive-date=April 6, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230406022833/https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2004/03/11/242128/bishops-endorse-mel-gibson-film/amp/|url-status=live}}</ref>

In ], government censors initially banned it completely, but after Christian leaders protested, the restriction was lifted, but only for Christian audiences, allowing them to view the film in specially designated theaters.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-jul-10-et-quick10-story.html|title=Censors in Malaysia give OK to 'Passion'|work=]|date=July 10, 2004|access-date=October 20, 2008|archive-date=December 24, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081224081158/http://articles.latimes.com/2004/jul/10/entertainment/et-quick10|url-status=live}}</ref> In Israel, the film was not banned. However, it never received theatrical distribution because no Israeli distributor would market it.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-mar-15-et-king15-story.html|title='Passion' goes unseen in Israel|first=Laura|last=King|work=]|date=March 15, 2004|access-date=October 20, 2008|archive-date=December 24, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081224081912/http://articles.latimes.com/2004/mar/15/entertainment/et-king15|url-status=live}}</ref>

Despite the many controversies and refusals by some governments to allow the film to be viewed in wide release, ''The Passion of the Christ'' earned $612 million worldwide.<ref name="BOM"/> The film was also a relative success in certain countries with large Muslim populations,<ref name=CSM>{{cite news|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0409/p01s02-wome.html|title=Gibson's movie unlikely box-office hit in Arab world|work=]|date=April 9, 2004|last=Blanford|first=Nicholas|access-date=March 6, 2006|archive-date=April 5, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230405220620/https://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0409/p01s02-wome.html|url-status=live}}</ref> such as in Egypt, where it ranked 20th overall in its box office numbers for 2004.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/intl/egypt/yearly/?yr=2004&p=.htm|title=2004 Box Office Totals for Egypt|website=]|access-date=October 12, 2019|archive-date=June 8, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240608212243/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/year/2004/?area=EG|url-status=live}}</ref> In addition, it witnessed immense popularity in countries like Jordan, Lebanon, Qatar, Syria, and the United Arab Emirates where political parallels with the ] resonated with audiences.<ref name=CSM/><ref>{{cite web |last=Dankowitz |first=Aluma |url=https://www.memri.org/reports/reactions-arab-media-passion-christ |title=Reactions in the Arab Media to 'The Passion of the Christ' |publisher=Middle East Media Research Institute |date=20 April 2004 }}</ref> However, it was banned in Bahrain, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia for religious reasons, particularly for depicting ].<ref name=CSM/>

The film was the ]<ref name="ncr">{{cite news |last=O'Neill |first=Eddie |title='The Passion of the Christ', a Decade Later |newspaper=National Catholic Register |date=February 2, 2014 |url=http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/the-passion-of-the-christ-a-decade-later/ |access-date=July 31, 2014 |archive-date=March 3, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303235124/http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/the-passion-of-the-christ-a-decade-later/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> until 2017, when it was surpassed by '']''.<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://variety.com/2017/film/asia/wolf-warriors-takes-all-time-china-box-office-record-1202518683/amp/|title='Wolf Warriors II' Takes All Time China Box Office Record|first=Patrick|last=Frater|magazine=]|date=August 8, 2017|access-date=December 12, 2017|archive-date=August 8, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170808061604/http://variety.com/2017/film/asia/wolf-warriors-takes-all-time-china-box-office-record-1202518683/amp/|url-status=live}}</ref>

===''The Passion Recut''===
]s.]]
''The Passion Recut'', a ], was released in theaters on March 11, 2005, with five minutes of the most ] deleted, in hopes of attracting more viewers and make the film approachable to consumers who found the original cut too gruesome. President of Newmarket Films ] stated, "I knew a lot of people that wanted to see it but couldn't go...They were just too nervous or squeamish".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/14/business/media/less-gore-no-rating-for-a-new-passion.html|title=Less Gore, No Rating for a New 'Passion'|work=]|date=14 February 2005|access-date=11 April 2024|archive-date=June 8, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240608212723/https://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/14/business/media/less-gore-no-rating-for-a-new-passion.html|url-status=live|author-last1=Robischon|author-first1=Noah}}</ref> Gibson explained his reasoning for this re-edited version: {{blockquote|After the initial run in movie theaters, I received numerous letters from people all across the country. Many told me they wanted to share the experience with loved ones but were concerned that the harsher images of the film would be too intense for them to bear. In light of this I decided to re-edit ''The Passion of the Christ''.<ref name=pluggedin>{{cite web|url=http://www.pluggedinonline.com/movies/movies/a0001657.cfm|title=''The Passion of the Christ'' Review|publisher=Plugged In|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121230075351/http://www.pluggedin.com/videos/2005/q1/passionofthechrist.aspx|archive-date=December 30, 2012}}</ref>}}

Gibson had anticipated for a ] rating after editing the film to bring it closer to that rating.<ref name=tampa>{{cite web|url=https://www.tampabay.com/archive/2005/03/10/the-passion-recut-eases-up-on-the-gore/|title=The Passion Recut' eases up on the gore|publisher=]|date=10 March 2005|access-date=11 April 2024|archive-date=June 8, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240608212242/https://www.tampabay.com/archive/2005/03/10/the-passion-recut-eases-up-on-the-gore/|url-status=live}}</ref> Though despite the re-editing, the ] still deemed ''The Passion Recut'' too violent for the PG-13 rating. But because Newmarket is not an MPAA ] and hence does not have to comply with MPAA guidelines, they decided to release the film as unrated.<ref name=pluggedin /> On the ''Passion Recut's'' rating and appeal to wider audiences, Berney explained:<ref>{{cite web|url=https://chicagoreader.com/film/the-passion-recut/|title=The Passion Recut|publisher=]|date=11 March 2005|access-date=11 April 2024|archive-date=September 28, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220928220830/https://chicagoreader.com/film/the-passion-recut/|url-status=live}}</ref>


{{blockquote|The goal was to try and reach toward a PG-13 level, but the MPAA felt it still was an R due to the overall intensity of the film, so we are going out unrated and perhaps it’s ultimately somewhere in between. The end result is a shift in tone and balance that makes the film more accessible to a wider audience, particularly those that had concerns about some of the extreme moments in the original version.}}
===International release===
====Government censorship====
In ], government ]s initially banned it completely, but after Christian leaders protested, the restriction was lifted, but only for Christian audiences, allowing them to view the film in specially designated theatres.<ref>{{cite news | url= http://articles.latimes.com/2004/jul/10/entertainment/et-quick10| title= Censors in Malaysia give OK to ‘Passion’| publisher=Los Angeles Times| date=2004-07-10| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref> In ], the film was not banned. However, it never received theatrical distribution because no Israeli distributor sought to market the movie.<ref>{{cite news | url= http://articles.latimes.com/2004/mar/15/entertainment/et-king15| title= ‘Passion’ goes unseen in Israel| author= Laura King| publisher=Los Angeles Times| date=2004-03-15| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref>


The film's re-release was an "experiment" for Newmarket and Icon, since the companies hoped for a four-week showing that would extended through ] (March 27). Had the experiment succeeded, Newmarket and Icon would have released the film every year around ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.goupstate.com/story/news/2005/03/12/passion-recut-features-less-violence/29751167007/|title='Passion Recut' features less violence|author=Nicole Sperling|publisher=]|date=11 March 2005|access-date=11 April 2024|archive-date=June 8, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230608020217/https://www.goupstate.com/story/news/2005/03/12/passion-recut-features-less-violence/29751167007/|url-status=live}}</ref> However, the shortened film showed for three weeks in 960 theaters for a box office total of $567,692, minuscule compared to the $612,054,428 of ''The Passion''.<ref name="Mojo Recut total"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200809163723/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/release/rl3630794241/ |date=August 9, 2020 }} ''Box Office Mojo''. Retrieved October 12, 2019.</ref> The ] classified the recut with a 15 rating, lower than the original cut's 18 rating.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbfc.co.uk/release/the-passion-of-the-christ-q29sbgvjdglvbjpwwc0znja4mjg|title=The Passion Of The Christ|publisher=]|access-date=11 April 2024|archive-date=August 15, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210815172211/https://www.bbfc.co.uk/release/the-passion-of-the-christ-q29sbgvjdglvbjpwwc0znja4mjg|url-status=live}}</ref>
====International box office====
Despite the various controversies and refusals of certain governments to allow the film to be viewed in wide release, ''The Passion of the Christ'' earned $611,899,420 worldwide.<ref name="BOM"/> The movie was also a relative success in certain countries with large Muslim populations,<ref name=CSM>{{cite web | url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0409/p01s02-wome.html | title=Gibson's movie unlikely box-office hit in Arab world | publisher=The Christian Science Monitor | date=2004-04-09 | last=Blanford | first=Nicholas }}</ref> such as in Egypt, where it ranked 20th overall in its box office numbers for 2004.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/intl/egypt/yearly/?yr=2004&p=.htm| title=2004 Box Office Totals for Egypt | publisher=BoxOfficeMojo.com}}</ref>


===Theatrical re-release=== ====Differences====
During the scourging scene, the ] striking Jesus's flesh that resulted in ] and his flesh being dislodged was omitted. In the crucifixion scene, the Roman soldiers nailing Jesus with blood spurting is cut, and the soldier strenuously ] Jesus's shoulder is trimmed; instead, the ]s of Mary and Jesus are shown. Incidentally, the scene in which the cross is flipped over and supernaturally suspended in air was also deleted, due to viewers not understanding what they saw.<ref name=pluggedin/>
An edited version titled ''The Passion Recut'' was released on March 11, 2005, with five minutes of the most explicit violence deleted to broaden the audience for the film. Gibson explained his reasoning for the new version of the film: <blockquote>After the initial run in movie theaters, I received numerous letters from people all across the country. Many told me they wanted to share the experience with loved ones but were concerned that the harsher images of the film would be too intense for them to bear. In light of this I decided to re-edit The Passion of the Christ.<ref name=pluggedin>{{cite web | url=http://www.pluggedinonline.com/movies/movies/a0001657.cfm | title=The Passion of the Christ Review | publisher=PluggedInOnline.com}}</ref></blockquote>


On this edit's overall effect, Gibson further added, "I have toned down some of the more brutal scenes without removing them or compromising the impact of the film. By softening some of its more wrenching aspects, I hope to make the film and its message of love available to a wider audience".<ref name=tampa/>
Despite the attempt to tone down the content, the ] deemed the film too violent to rate ], so Gibson released it as unrated.<ref name=pluggedin /> The re-release did not end up being a commercial success, only showing for three weeks before its poor box office results caused it to be pulled from theaters.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=passionrecut.htm | title=Box Office Stats for The Passion Recut | publisher=BoxOfficeMojo.com}}</ref>


===Home media=== ===Home media===
On August 31, 2004, the film was released on ] and ] in North America by ], which initially passed on theatrical distribution. As with the original theatrical release, the film's release on home video formats proved to be very popular. Early estimates indicated that over 2.4 million copies of the film were sold by 3:00{{spaces}}p.m.,<ref name=vty>{{cite news |last1=Hettrick |first1=Scott |title=DVD buyers express 'Passion' |url=https://variety.com/2004/digital/features/dvd-buyers-express-passion-1117909854/ |access-date=June 18, 2019 |work=Variety |date=September 1, 2004 |language=en |archive-date=August 9, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200809063756/https://variety.com/2004/digital/features/dvd-buyers-express-passion-1117909854/ |url-status=live }}</ref> with a total of 4.1 million copies on its first day of sale.<ref name="Today 2004 4.1">] (September 1, 2004). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220220000000/https://web.archive.org/web/20220220193856/https://www.today.com/popculture/passion-dvd-sells-4-1-million-one-day-wbna5888815 |date=February 20, 2022 }} '']''. Retrieved October 13, 2019.</ref> The film was available on DVD with English and Spanish subtitles and on VHS tape with English subtitles. The film was released on ] in North America as a two-disc Definitive Edition set on February 17, 2009.<ref name="PassionoftheChristBlu-ray">{{cite AV media | title=The Passion of the Christ | url=http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/302426419 | oclc=302426419 | publisher=20th Century Fox Home Entertainment | edition=definitive | location=Beverly Hills, California | first=Mel | last=Gibson | type=Blu-ray; visual material | language=la, he | access-date=March 29, 2013 | archive-date=June 8, 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240608212244/https://search.worldcat.org/title/302426419 | url-status=live }}</ref> It was also released on Blu-ray in Australia a week before Easter.
{{Ref improve section|date=August 2010}}
On August 31, 2004, the film was released on ], ], and later ] in North America. As with the original theatrical release, the film's release on home video formats proved to be very popular. Early reports indicated that over 2.4 million copies of the film were sold by the middle of the day. The film was available on DVD with English and Spanish subtitles, and on ] tape with English subtitles. On February 17, 2009, the film was released on ] in North America as a two-disc Definitive Edition set. It was also released on Blu-ray in Australia a week before Easter.


Although the original DVD release of ''The Passion of The Christ'' sold well, it contained no extra materials other than soundtrack language selections. The no-frills edition provoked speculation about when a ] would be released. On Tuesday, January 30, 2007, a two-disc Definitive Edition of ''The Passion of The Christ'' was released in the American markets, and March 26 elsewhere. It contains several ], ] ], ]s, ]s, the 2005 ] version, and the original 2004 theatrical version.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.miserere.org/m/archivedposts/175 | title=Re-Release of The Passion | publisher=Miserere.org}}</ref> Although the original DVD release sold well, it contained no bonus features other than a trailer, which provoked speculation about how many buyers would wait for a ] to be released.<ref name=vty/> On January 30, 2007, a two-disc Definitive Edition was released in the North American markets, and March 26 of that year elsewhere. It contains several documentaries, soundtrack ], ]s, ]s, the 2005 ] version, and the original 2004 theatrical version.


The British version of the 2 disc DVD contains two deleted scenes. In the first deleted scene, Jesus meets the women of Jerusalem which is the eighth station of the cross, "Jesus falls to the ground as the women wail around him and Simon of Cyrene attempts to hold up the cross and help up Jesus simultaneously. Afterwards, while both are holding up the cross, Jesus says to Simon, "Do not weep for me, but for yourselves and for your children". In the second scene Pilate washes his hands and turns to Caiaphas and says "Look you to it" (ie: the Pharisees wish to have him crucified). Pilate turns to Abanader and says "Do as they wish". The scene then shows Pilate calling to his servant who is carrying a wooden board on which Pilate writes 'Jesus of Nazareth king of the Jews' in Latin and Hebrew. He then holds the board above his head in full view of Caiaphas, who after reading it challenges Pilate on its content. Pilate replies (...) angrily to Caiaphas in Aramaic (content not translated). The disc contains only two deleted scenes in total. No other scenes from the movie are shown on disc. 2.<ref>http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2007/03/19/the_passion_of_the_christ_special_edition_dvd_2007_review.shtml</ref> The British version of the two-disc DVD contains two additional deleted scenes. In the first, Jesus meets the women of Jerusalem (at the eighth station of the cross) and falls to the ground as the women wail around him, and ] attempts to hold up the cross and help up Jesus simultaneously. Afterwards, while both are holding up the cross, Jesus says to the women weeping for him, "Do not weep for me, but for yourselves and for your children". In the second, Pilate washes his hands, turns to Caiaphas, and says: "Look you to it" (i.e., the Pharisees wish to have Jesus crucified). Pilate then turns to Abanader and says: "Do as they wish". The scene next shows Pilate calling to his servant, who is carrying a wooden board on which Pilate writes, "Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews", in Latin and Hebrew. He then holds the board above his head in full view of Caiaphas, who after reading it challenges Pilate on its content. Pilate replies angrily to Caiaphas in non-subtitled Hebrew. The disc contains only two deleted scenes in total. No other scenes from the movie are shown on disc 2.<ref>{{cite web |first=Stella |last=Papamichael |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2007/03/19/the_passion_of_the_christ_special_edition_dvd_2007_review.shtml |title=The Passion of the Christ: Special Edition DVD |publisher=BBC |access-date=June 5, 2012 |archive-date=September 27, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927233412/http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2007/03/19/the_passion_of_the_christ_special_edition_dvd_2007_review.shtml |url-status=live }}</ref>

On February 7, 2017, 20th Century Fox re-released the film on Blu-ray and DVD featuring the theatrical version and the edited version (The Passion Recut), where the graphic violence is reduced. The theatrical version features English and Spanish dubs;<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/20th_Century_Fox/Disc_Announcements/mel-gibsons-the-passion-of-the-christ-returns-to-bluray/37982 | title=Mel Gibson's 'The Passion of the Christ' Returns to Blu-ray | publisher=High-Def Digest | access-date=February 12, 2017 | archive-date=February 13, 2017 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170213005315/http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/20th_Century_Fox/Disc_Announcements/mel-gibsons-the-passion-of-the-christ-returns-to-bluray/37982 | url-status=live }}</ref> this marks the first time the film has ever been dubbed in another language.


===Television broadcast=== ===Television broadcast===
On April 17, 2011 (]), ] (TBN) presented a world television premiere of the film at 7:30PM ET/PT, with multiple showings scheduled. TBN presented the film with much of the graphic violence left in; as a result, TBN rated the film "]" – a rarity for many Christian networks.<ref></ref><ref></ref> On April 17, 2011 (]), ] (TBN) presented the film at 7:30&nbsp;p.m. ET/PT, in the United States with multiple showings scheduled. The network had continued to air the film throughout the year, and particularly around Easter.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tbn.org/watch-us/our-programs/the-passion-of-the-christ |title=The Passion of the Christ |publisher=TBN |access-date=June 5, 2012 |archive-date=June 6, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120606022007/http://www.tbn.org/watch-us/our-programs/the-passion-of-the-christ |url-status=dead }}</ref>

On March 29, 2013 (]), as a part of their special ] programming, ] in the Philippines presented the Filipino-dubbed version of the film at 2:00{{spaces}}p.m. (], ]). Its total broadcast ran for two hours, but excluding the advertisements, it would only run up for approximately one hour instead of its full run time of two hours and six minutes. It ended at 4:00&nbsp;p.m. It has been rated SPG by the ] (MTRCB) for themes, language and violence with some scenes censored for television. TV5 is the first broadcast network outside of the United States and dubbed the Vernacular Hebrew and Latin language to Filipino (through translating its supplied English subtitles).


==Reception== ==Reception==
===Critical reviews=== ===Critical response===
On ], ''The Passion of the Christ'' holds an approval rating of 50% based on 276 critic reviews and an 80% rating based on more than 250,000 user reviews. The website's critical consensus reads: "Director Mel Gibson's zeal is unmistakable, but ''The Passion of the Christ'' will leave many viewers emotionally drained rather than spiritually uplifted."<ref name="tomatoes">{{cite web|title=''The Passion of the Christ'' (2004)|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/passion_of_the_christ/|access-date=July 16, 2008|website=]|archive-date=July 16, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080716135128/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/passion_of_the_christ/|url-status=live}}</ref> On ], the film has a weighted average of 47 out of 100, based on 44 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".<ref name="metacritic">{{cite web|title=''The Passion of the Christ'' (2004): reviews|url=https://www.metacritic.com/video/titles/passionofthechrist|access-date=July 16, 2008|website=]|archive-date=June 16, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080616082304/http://www.metacritic.com/video/titles/passionofthechrist|url-status=dead}}</ref> Audiences polled by ] gave the film a rare "A+" grade, however.<ref>{{Cite web |first=Pamela |last=McClintock |title=Why CinemaScore Matters for Box Office |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/why-cinemascore-matters-box-office-225563/ |website=] |date=August 19, 2011 |access-date=July 19, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210719145918/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/why-cinemascore-matters-box-office-225563/ |archive-date=July 19, 2021 |url-status=live}}</ref>
The film received mixed reviews from critics; critics have praised the performance of ] as Jesus. The review aggregator ] reported that 50% gave the film positive reviews, based on 260 reviews total; with the consensus that "the graphic details of Jesus' ] make the movie tough to sit through and obscure whatever message it is trying to convey."<ref name=tomatoes >{{cite web|url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/passion_of_the_christ/ |title=The Passion of the Christ Movie Reviews, Pictures – Rotten Tomatoes |accessdate=2008-07-16 |publisher=]}}</ref> ] reported the film had an average score of 47 out of 100, based on 43 reviews.<ref name=metacritic >{{cite web|url=http://www.metacritic.com/video/titles/passionofthechrist |title=Passion of the Christ, The (2004): Reviews |accessdate=2008-07-16 |publisher=]}}</ref>


In a positive review for '']'', its critic ] called ''The Passion of the Christ'' "a serious, handsome, excruciating film that radiates total commitment."<ref name="metacritic" /> '']'' film critic ] praised Gibson's direction, comparing him to ] in how he transformed art into spirituality.<ref>{{cite news|author=White, Armond|date=March 18, 2008|url=http://www.nypress.com/article-19539-steve-mcqueens-hunger.html|title=Steve McQueen's Hunger|work=]|access-date=April 16, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090423043019/http://www.nypress.com/article-19539-steve-mcqueens-hunger.html|archive-date=April 23, 2009|url-status=dead}}</ref> White also noted that it was odd to see Director Mel Gibson offer audiences "an intellectual challenge" with the film.<ref name="White, Armond">{{cite news|author=White, Armond|date=February 26, 2004|title=Africana Reviews: The Passion of the Christ (web archive)|url=http://www.africana.com/reviews/moviestv/mtv20040227passion.asp|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040312222102/http://www.africana.com/reviews/moviestv/mtv20040227passion.asp|archive-date=March 12, 2004|url-status=dead}}</ref> ] from the '']'' gave the movie four out of four stars, calling it "the most violent film I have ever seen" as well as reflecting on how it struck him, a former ]: "What Gibson has provided for me, for the first time in my life, is a visceral idea of what the Passion consisted of. That his film is superficial in terms of the surrounding message—that we get only a few passing references to the teachings of Jesus—is, I suppose, not the point. This is not a sermon or a homily, but a visualization of the central event in the Christian religion. Take it or leave it."<ref name="Roger">{{cite news|first=Roger|last=Ebert|author-link=Roger Ebert|title=The Passion of the Christ|newspaper=]|date=February 24, 2004|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-passion-of-the-christ-2004|access-date=August 2, 2006|via=rogerebert.com|archive-date=March 14, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314190316/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-passion-of-the-christ-2004|url-status=live}}</ref>
] gave the film four out of four stars, and called it "the most violent film I have ever seen", also reflecting on how the movie personally impacted him as a former ].<ref name=Roger >{{cite news | last = Ebert | first = Roger | coauthors = | title = Movie Reviews: The Passion of the Christ | work = | pages = | publisher = Chicago Sun–Times |date=2004-02-24 | url = http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040224/REVIEWS/402240301/1023 | accessdate = 2006-08-02 }}</ref> '']'' film critic ] praised Gibson's work, comparing him to ], for transforming Art into spirituality.<ref>White, Armond (2008-03-18). , '']''. Retrieved on 2009-04-16.</ref> However, '']'' reviewer ] called it "a two-hour-and-six-minute ],"<ref>{{cite news | first=David | last=Edelstein | coauthors= |authorlink= David Edelstein | title=Jesus H. Christ | date=2004-02-24 | publisher= | url =http://slate.msn.com//id/2096025/ | work =] | pages = | accessdate = 2009-11-18 | language = }}</ref> while ] of the '']'' called it "the most virulently anti-Semitic movie made since the German propaganda films of World War II."<ref>{{cite news | first=Jami | last=Bernard | coauthors= |authorlink= Jami Bernard | title=The Passion of the Christ | date=2004-02-24 | publisher= | url = | work =] | pages = | accessdate = 2009-11-18 | language = }}</ref> '']'' magazine listed it as one of the most violent films of all time.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2015869_2015874_2015850,00.html |title=Top 10 Ridiculously Violent Movies |author=Josh Sanburn |date=September 3, 2010 |publisher='']''}}</ref>


In a negative review, '']'' magazine's ] called it "a two-hour-and-six-minute ]",<ref name="Edelstein 2004 Slate">{{cite news|first=David|last=Edelstein|author-link=David Edelstein|title=Jesus H. Christ|date=February 24, 2004|url=https://slate.com/culture/2004/02/the-passion-mel-gibson-s-bloody-mess.html|work=]|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091123175411/http://slate.msn.com/id/2096025|archive-date=November 23, 2009}}</ref> and ] of the '']'' felt it was "the most virulently anti-Semitic movie made since the ]".<ref>{{cite news|first=Jami|last=Bernard|author-link=Jami Bernard|title=The Passion of the Christ|date=February 24, 2004|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/story/167326p-146309c.html|work=]|publisher=]|location=New York City|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040416131649/http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/story/167326p-146309c.html|archive-date=April 16, 2004|url-status=dead}}</ref> Writing for the '']'', ] stated that he found the movie "too turgid to awe the nonbelievers, too zealous to inspire and often too silly to take seriously, with its demonic hallucinations that look like escapees from a ] film; I swear I couldn't find the devil carrying around a hairy-backed midget anywhere in the text I read."<ref name="metacritic" />
The June 2006 issue of '']'' named ''The Passion of the Christ'' the most controversial film of all time, followed by ]'s film '']''.<ref name=EW >{{cite magazine | title=Entertainment Weekly |date=June 2006}}</ref>


The June 2006 issue of '']'' named ''The Passion of the Christ'' the most controversial film of all time, followed by ]'s '']'' (1971).<ref name=EW >{{cite journal|title=Entertainment Weekly|date=June 2006}}</ref> In 2010, ''Time'' listed it as one of the most "ridiculously violent" films of all time.<ref>{{cite magazine|first=Josh|last=Sanburn|url=http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2015869_2015874_2015850,00.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100905022317/http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2015869_2015874_2015850,00.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=September 5, 2010|title=Top 10 Ridiculously Violent Movies|date=September 3, 2010|magazine=]|location=New York City|access-date=January 11, 2019}}</ref>
===Independent promotion and discussion===
A number of independent ] such as ''MyLifeAfter.com'' and ''Passion-Movie.com'' were launched to promote the film and its message and to allow people to discuss the film's effect on their lives. Documentaries such as ''Changed Lives: Miracles of the Passion'' chronicled stories of miraculous savings, forgiveness, new-found faith, and the story of a man who confessed to ] his girlfriend after authorities determined her death was due to ].<ref></ref> Another documentary, ''Impact: The Passion of the Christ'', chronicled the popular response of the film in the United States, ], and ] and examined the claims of anti-Semitism against Mel Gibson and the film.


==Controversies== ===Accolades===
====Wins====
===Questions of historical and biblical accuracy===
*] – ] (tie)
Despite criticisms that Gibson deliberately and severely departed from historical accounts of first century Judea and Biblical accounts of Christ's crucifixion, some scholars defend the film as not meaning to be historically accurate. Biblical scholar ] protested that he could not find one documented example of Gibson explicitly claiming the film to be historically accurate.<ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.ntgateway.com/weblog/2004/05/historical-accuracy-of-passion-of.html| title=Historical Accuracy of The Passion of the Christ | author= Mark Goodacre| date=2004-05-02| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref><ref>Mark Goodacre, “The Power of The Passion: Reacting and Over-reacting to Gibson's Artistic Vision” in “Jesus and Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ. The Film, the Gospels and the Claims of History,” ed. Kathleen E. Corley and Robert L. Webb, 2004</ref> Gibson has been quoted as saying, "I think that my first duty is to be as faithful as possible in telling the story so that it doesn't contradict the Scriptures. Now, so long as it didn't do that, I felt that I had a pretty wide berth for artistic interpretation, and to fill in some of the spaces with logic, with imagination, with various other readings."<ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/interviews/melgibson.html| title= 'Dude, That Was Graphic': Mel Gibson talks about The Passion of The Christ| author= David Neff and Jane Johnson Struck | publisher= Christianity Today | date=February 23, 2004| accessdate=2008-10-20 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080709100026/http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/interviews/melgibson.html |archivedate = July 9, 2008}}</ref>
*] – ]
*] – ]
*] (EMMA Awards) – Best Film Actress – Maia Morgenstern
*] (Golden Reel Awards) – Best Sound Editing in a Feature Film – Music – Michael T. Ryan
*] – ASCAP Henry Mancini Award – ]{{citation needed|date=September 2016}}
*], US – Hollywood Producer of the Year – Mel Gibson<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000154/awards|title=Mel Gibson|website=IMDb|access-date=February 1, 2019|archive-date=March 12, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180312105453/http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000154/awards?|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.hollywoodawards.com/2004/10/hollywood-awards-and-the-winners-are-2/|title=Hollywood Awards ... and the winners are ...|date=October 19, 2004|website=Hollywood Film Awards|language=en|access-date=February 1, 2019|archive-date=February 2, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190202045601/https://www.hollywoodawards.com/2004/10/hollywood-awards-and-the-winners-are-2/|url-status=live}}</ref>
*], ], ]
*] – ]<ref name="2004 nominations2">{{cite web|url=https://ruskino.ru/award/orel/2004|script-title=ru:Золотой Орел 2004|trans-title=Golden Eagle 2004|publisher=Ruskino.ru|access-date=6 March 2017|language=ru|archive-date=February 25, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225022346/https://ruskino.ru/award/orel/2004|url-status=live}}</ref>


====Nominations====
In the film, Romans use Latin amongst themselves, Jews do the same with Aramaic, and the two groups adopt one or the other of these languages in communicating with each other. The latter is historically improbable, however, as the eastern parts of the Roman empire were extensively Hellenized, and Greek was the lingua franca.<ref>Longhenry, E.R '''' March 2004 retrieved 03 September 2010</ref>
*]
**] – ]
**] – ], ]
**] – ]
*] – ] – Caleb Deschanel
*] – ]
*] – ]
*] – ] – Jim Caviezel
*] (]) – ] – Monica Bellucci<ref>{{cite news |author=<!--not stated--> |date=May 9, 2017 |title=Monica Bellucci, nastro d'argento europeo |trans-title=Monica Bellucci, European silver ribbon |url=https://www.ansa.it/lifestyle/notizie/people/persone/2017/05/09/cinema-monica-bellucci-nastro-dargento-europeo_72e80892-b622-4811-9af6-09fa6743a988.html |url-status=live |language=it |work=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204165138/https://www.ansa.it/lifestyle/notizie/people/persone/2017/05/09/cinema-monica-bellucci-nastro-dargento-europeo_72e80892-b622-4811-9af6-09fa6743a988.html |archive-date=February 4, 2023 |access-date=May 29, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Morgoglione |first=Claudia |date=January 22, 2005 |title=Gianni Amelio contro&nbsp;... |trans-title=Gianni Amelio against Sorrentino in the race for the Nastro d'Argento |url=https://www.repubblica.it/2005/a/sezioni/spettacoli_e_cultura/nastri/nastri/nastri.html |url-status=live |language=it |work=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050125095051/https://www.repubblica.it/2005/a/sezioni/spettacoli_e_cultura/nastri/nastri/nastri.html |archive-date=January 25, 2005 |access-date=May 29, 2023}}</ref>


===Controversies===
When asked about the film's faithfulness to the account given in the New Testament, Father Di Noia of the Doctrinal Congregation replied: "Mel Gibson's film is not a documentary but a work of artistic imagination" and "Gibson's film is entirely faithful to the New Testament."<ref>http://www.zenit.org/article-8894?l=english</ref>
====Questions of historical and biblical accuracy====
Despite criticisms that Gibson deliberately added material to the historical accounts of first-century Judea and biblical accounts of Christ's crucifixion, some scholars defend the film as not being primarily concerned with historical accuracy. Biblical scholar ] protested that he could not find one documented example of Gibson explicitly claiming the film to be historically accurate.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ntgateway.com/weblog/2004/05/historical-accuracy-of-passion-of.html|title=Historical Accuracy of The Passion of the Christ|first=Mark|last=Goodacre|date=May 2, 2004|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081013105752/http://ntgateway.com/weblog/2004/05/historical-accuracy-of-passion-of.html|archive-date=October 13, 2008}}</ref><ref>Mark Goodacre, "The Power of The Passion: Reacting and Over-reacting to Gibson's Artistic Vision" in "Jesus and Mel Gibson's ''The Passion of the Christ''. The Film, the Gospels and the Claims of History", ed. Kathleen E. Corley and Robert L. Webb, 2004</ref> Gibson has been quoted as saying: "I think that my first duty is to be as faithful as possible in telling the story so that it doesn't contradict the Scriptures. Now, so long as it didn't do that, I felt that I had a pretty wide berth for artistic interpretation, and to fill in some of the spaces with logic, with imagination, with various other readings."<ref name="Neff 2004 CT">{{cite magazine|url=http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/interviews/melgibson.html|title='Dude, that was graphic': Mel Gibson talks about ''The Passion of The Christ''|author=Neff, David, and Struck, Jane Johnson |magazine=]|date=February 23, 2004|access-date=October 20, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080709100026/http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/interviews/melgibson.html|archive-date=July 9, 2008}}</ref> One such example is a scene in which Judas Iscariot is shown being tormented by demons in the form of children. Another scene shows Satan carrying a demonic baby during Christ's flogging, construed as a perversion of traditional depictions of the ], and also as a representation of Satan and the ]. Gibson's description:


{{blockquote|It's evil distorting what's good. What is more tender and beautiful than a mother and a child? So the Devil takes that and distorts it just a little bit. Instead of a normal mother and child, you have an androgynous figure holding a 40-year-old 'baby' with hair on his back. It is weird, it is shocking, it's almost too much—just like turning Jesus over to continue scourging him on his chest is shocking and almost too much, which is the exact moment when this appearance of the Devil and the baby takes place.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Moring|first=Mark|title=What's up with the ugly baby?|magazine=]|date=March 1, 2004|url=http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/news/040301-passion.html|access-date=August 20, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080709113146/http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/news/040301-passion.html|archive-date=July 9, 2008}}</ref>}}
===Promotional screenings===
Gibson was criticized by ], National Director of the ] (whose stated purpose is to fight anti-Semitism and all forms of bigotry in the U.S.), for holding private screenings for prominent, politically and socially conservative Christian and Jewish religious leaders yet not inviting those who had already criticized the film.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DRIT=3&DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=111&FID=610&PID=0&IID=572&TTL=Mel_Gibson%27s_The_Passion_of_the_Christ:_Legitimizing_Anti-Semitism|title=Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ:Legitimizing Anti-Semitism|author=Abraham Foxman|publisher=Institute for Global Jewish Affairs|date=2006-05-01}}</ref>


When asked about the film's faithfulness to the account given in the New Testament, Father Augustine Di Noia of the ]'s Doctrinal Congregation replied: "Mel Gibson's film is not a documentary... but remains faithful to the fundamental structure common to all four accounts of the Gospels" and "Mel Gibson's film is entirely faithful to the New Testament".<ref name="Zenit Di Noia 2003">{{cite web|url=http://www.zenit.org/article-8894?l=english|title=Mel Gibson's ''Passion'': on review at the Vatican|publisher=Zenit News Agency|access-date=October 17, 2019|date=December 8, 2003|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120914170155/http://www.zenit.org/article-8894?l=english|archive-date=September 14, 2012}}</ref>
===Disputed papal endorsement===
In early December 2003, ''Passion of the Christ'' co-producer ] provided the film to Archbishop ], the pope's secretary. Archbishop Dziwisz returned the film to McEveety and said he had watched it with ]. On December 16, '']'' reported that the pope had seen the film, and on Dec. 17, '']'' columnist ] reported that John Paul II had said: "It is as it was," sourcing McEveety, who said he heard it from Dziwisz.<ref name=noonan>{{cite news | url= http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110004442| title= 'It Is as It Was' Mel Gibson's "The Passion" gets a thumbs-up from the pope. | author= Peggy Noonan| publisher=Wall Street Journal| date=2003-12-17| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref> '']'' journalist ] published a similar account on the same day, quoting an unnamed senior Vatican official.<ref name="bare_url">{{cite news | url= http://nationalcatholicreporter.org/word/word012304.htm| title= The Word From Rome | author= John L. Allen, Jr. | publisher= National Catholic Reporter | date=2004-01-23| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref> The following day, ] and the ] each independently confirmed the story, citing Vatican sources.<ref name="Peggy Noonan">{{cite news | url= http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110004587| title= The story of the Vatican and Mel Gibson's film gets curiouser | author= Peggy Noonan| publisher=Wall Street Journal| date=2004-01-22| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref><ref name="bare_url" /> On December 24, an anonymous Vatican official told ], "There was no declaration, no judgment from the pope." On January 9, John Allen defended his earlier reporting, saying that his official source was adamant about the veracity of the original story.<ref>{{cite news|url= http http://www.nationalcatholicreporter.org/word/word010904.htm|title= The Word From Rome | author= John L. Allen, Jr. | publisher= National Catholic Reporter|date=2004-01-09|accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref> In a January 18 column, ] interviewed the Italian translator who quoted Dziwisz as saying that the pope called the film "incredible" and said "it is as it was." Rich attacked the marketing of the film and suggested Dziwisz wielded too much influence over the pope. The next day Archbishop Dziwisz told CNS, "The Holy Father told no one his opinion of this film."<ref>{{cite news
| last = Wooden
| first = Cindy
| coauthors =
| title = Pope never commented on Gibson's 'Passion' film, says papal secretary
| work =
| pages =
| language =
| publisher = ]
|date=2004-01-19
| url = http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/20040119.htm
| accessdate = 2008-08-20 }}</ref> This denial resulted in a round of commentators who accused the film producers of fabricating a papal quote to market their movie.


====Disputed papal endorsement====
However, the ] spokesman stood by the story, and a source close to the situation said McEveety had asked for and received Vatican officials' permission to repeat the "It is as it was" statement before speaking to Noonan.<ref>{{cite news | url= http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117898727.html?categoryid=13&cs=1| title= Did Pope really plug 'Passion'?| author= Gabriel Snyder| publisher=Daily Variety| date=2004-01-19| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref> Journalist ] reported that McEveety had received an email from papal spokesman Dr. ] on December 28, backing the Noonan account and ending: "I would try to make the words 'It is as it was' the leit motive in any discusion on the film. Repeat the words again and again and again."<ref>{{cite news | url= http://www.dallasnews.com/s/dws/dn/opinion/columnists/rdreher/stories/012204dnedidreher.ebfd.html |title=Did the Vatican endorse Gibson's film – or didn't it?| author= Rod Dreher| publisher=Dallas Morning News| date=2004-01-21| accessdate=2008-10-19 |archiveurl = http://osdir.com/ml/music.dadl.ot/2004-01/msg00784.html |archivedate=January 2004}}</ref>
On December 5, 2003, ''Passion of the Christ'' co-producer ] gave a rough cut<ref name="Vivarelli 2003 Pope peeks">Vivarelli, Nick (December 15, 2003). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191017230916/https://variety.com/2003/film/markets-festivals/pope-peeks-at-private-passion-preview-1117897210/ |date=October 17, 2019 }} Variety. Retrieved October 17, 2019.</ref> of the film to Archbishop ], the pope's secretary.<ref name="Flynn 2003 5sw">Flynn, J. D. (December 18, 2003). '']''. Retrieved October 17, 2019.</ref> Pope ] watched the film in his private apartment with Archbishop Dziwisz that night, and later met with McEveety<ref name="Allen More 2004 NCR"/> and Jan Michelini, an Italian and the movie's assistant director.<ref name="Rich 2004 thumbs up"/><ref name="Wooden 2004 never"/> On December 17, '']'' columnist ] reported John Paul II had said "It is as it was", citing McEveety, who said he heard it from Dziwisz.<ref name="Noonan 2003 thumbs-up">{{cite news|url=http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110004442|title='It is as it was': Mel Gibson's ''The Passion'' gets a thumbs-up from the pope.|author=Noonan, Peggy|work=]|date=December 17, 2003|access-date=October 20, 2008|author-link=Peggy Noonan|archive-date=March 27, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100327022139/http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110004442|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Snyder 2004 Plug">Snyder, Gabriel (January 19, 2004). ''Variety''. Archived from on December 19, 2008. Retrieved October 18, 2019.</ref> Noonan had emailed ], the head of the Vatican's press office, for confirmation before writing her column, surprised that the "famously close-mouthed" Navarro-Valls had approved the use of the "It is as it was" quote, and his emailed response stated he had no other comment at that time.<ref name="Noonan WSJ 2004 curiouser"/> '']'' journalist ] published a similar account on the same day, quoting an unnamed senior Vatican official.<ref name="Allen More 2004 NCR"/> Reuters<ref name="Noonan WSJ 2004 curiouser">{{cite news|last=Noonan|first=Peggy|url=http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110004587|title=The story of the Vatican and Mel Gibson's film gets curiouser|work=]|date=January 22, 2004|access-date=October 20, 2008|archive-date=December 20, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081220095533/http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110004587|url-status=live}}</ref> and the ] independently confirmed the story, citing Vatican sources.<ref name="Allen 2004 NCR">] (January 23, 2004). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080705014934/http://nationalcatholicreporter.org/word/word012304.htm |date=July 5, 2008 }} '']'': The Word from Rome. Retrieved October 20, 2008.</ref>


A dispute emerged a few days later, when an anonymous Vatican official told ] "There was no declaration, no judgment from the pope." But Allen defended his earlier reporting, saying that his official source was adamant about the veracity of the original story.<ref name="Allen More 2004 NCR">Allen, John L. Jr. (January 9, 2004). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240608212243/http://www.nationalcatholicreporter.org/word/word010904.htm |date=June 8, 2024 }} ''National Catholic Reporter'': The Word from Rome. Retrieved October 20, 2008.</ref> Columnist ] for '']'' wrote that the statement was "being exploited by the Gibson camp", and that when he asked Michelini about the meeting, Michelini said Dziwisz had reported the pope's words as "It is as it was", and said the pope also called the film "incredibile", <!-- This is Italian; it is not misspelled --> an Italian word Michelini translated as "amazing".<ref name="Rich 2004 thumbs up"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191018072204/https://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/18/movies/the-pope-s-thumbs-up-for-gibson-s-passion.html |date=October 18, 2019 }}. '']'' Retrieved October 18, 2019.</ref> The following day, Archbishop Dziwisz told CNS, "The Holy Father told no one his opinion of this film."<ref name="Wooden 2004 never">{{cite news|last=Wooden|first=Cindy|title=Pope never commented on Gibson's 'Passion' film, says papal secretary|publisher=]|date=January 19, 2004|url=http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/20040119.htm|archive-url=http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20040124050858/http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/20040119.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=January 24, 2004}}</ref> This denial resulted in a round of commentators who accused the film producers of fabricating a papal quote to market their movie.
Peggy Noonan had also received email confirmation of the quote from Navarro-Valls before writing her December 17 column. Complicating the situation, Navarro-Valls told Dreher that the email sent to McEveety was not genuine, suggesting it was fabricated. However Noonan verified that all of the Navarro-Valls emails came from the same Vatican IP address.<ref name="Peggy Noonan"/> The '']'' reported that they had previously confirmed the accuracy of the quote from Navarro-Valls when the story first broke. On CNN, ] reported Vatican sources who claim to have heard Dziwisz on other occasions affirm the accuracy of the quotation.<ref>{{cite news | url= http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0401/21/lol.07.html| title= 'The Passion' Stirs Controversy at the Vatican | publisher= CNN transcript
| date=2004-01-21| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref>


According to ] in the ''Dallas Morning News'', McEveety was sent an email from papal spokesman Navarro-Valls that supported the Noonan account, and suggested "It is as it was" could be used as the ] in discussions on the film and said to "Repeat the words again and again and again."<ref name="Dreher 2004 endorse">Dreher, Rod (January 21, 2004). '']''. Archived from on January 27, 2012. Retrieved October 19, 2008.</ref><!-- The period here belongs inside the quotation marks as in the original. See ]. --> Dreher emailed Navarro-Valls a copy of the email McEveety had received, and Navarro-Valls emailed Dreher back and said, "I can categorically deny its authenticity."<ref name="Dreher 2004 endorse"/><ref name="Noonan WSJ 2004 curiouser"/> Dreher opined that either Mel Gibson's camp had created "a lollapalooza of a lie", or the Vatican was making reputable journalists and filmmakers look like "sleazebags or dupes" and he explained: {{blockquote|Interestingly, Ms. Noonan reported in her Dec. 17 column that when she asked the spokesman if the pope had said anything more than "It is as it was," he e-mailed her to say he didn't know of any further comments. She sent me a copy of that e-mail, which came from the same Vatican email address as the one to me and to Mr. McEveety.<ref name="Dreher 2004 endorse"/>}}
On January 22, Navarro-Valls released the following official statement: <blockquote>"The film is a cinematographic transposition of the historical event of the Passion of Jesus Christ according to the accounts of the Gospel. It is a common practice of the Holy Father not to express public opinions on artistic works, opinions that are always open to different evaluations of aesthetic character."<ref>{{cite news | url= http://nationalcatholicreporter.org/word/word012304.htm| title= The Word From Rome.. | author= John L. Allen, Jr. | publisher= National Catholic Reporter

| date=2004-01-23| accessdate=2008-10-20}}</ref>
Noonan noted that she and Dreher had discovered the emails were sent by "an email server in the Vatican's domain" from a Vatican computer with the same IP address.<ref name="Noonan WSJ 2004 curiouser"/> The '']'' reported that, when it asked after the story first broke if the "It is as it was" quote was reliable, Navarro-Valls had responded "I think you can consider that quote as accurate."<ref name="Munoz 2004 LAT fallout">Munoz, Lorenza and Stammer, Larry B. (January 23, 2004). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191019235902/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-jan-23-et-munoz23-story.html |date=October 19, 2019 }} '']''. Contributions by Greg Braxton and the Associated Press. Retrieved October 19, 2019.</ref> Allen noted that while Dziwisz stated that Pope John Paul II made no declaration about this movie, other Vatican officials were "continuing to insist" the pope did say it, and other sources claimed they had heard Dziwisz say the pope said it on other occasions, and Allen called the situation "kind of a mess".<ref name="Allen-O'Brien CNN Interview 2004"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090211043037/http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0401/21/lol.07.html |date=February 11, 2009 }} '']''. Miles O'Brien interview with ] on January 21, 2004. Retrieved October 20, 2008.</ref> A representative from Gibson's Icon Productions expressed surprise at Dziwisz's statements after the correspondence and conversations between film representatives and the pope's official spokesperson, Navarro-Valls, and stated "there is no reason to believe that the pope's support of the film 'isn't as it was.'"<ref name="Snyder 2004 Plug"/>

After speaking to Dziwisz, Navarro-Valls confirmed John Paul II had seen ''The Passion of the Christ'', and released the following official statement:
<blockquote>The film is a cinematographic transposition of the historical event of the Passion of Jesus Christ according to the accounts of the Gospel. It is a common practice of the Holy Father not to express public opinions on artistic works, opinions that are always open to different evaluations of aesthetic character.<ref name="Allen 2004 NCR"/>
</blockquote> </blockquote>


In a follow-up column in ''The Wall Street Journal'', Noonan addressed the question of why the issues being raised were not just "a tempest in a teapot" and she explained:<ref name="Noonan WSJ 2004 curiouser"/>{{blockquote|The truth matters. What a pope says matters. And what this pontiff says about this film matters. ''The Passion'', which is to open on Feb. 25, has been the focus of an intense critical onslaught since last summer. The film has been fiercely denounced as anti-Semitic, and accused of perpetuating stereotypes that will fan hatred against Jews. John Paul II has a long personal and ] of opposing anti-Semitism, of working against it, and of ], respect and reconciliation between all religions. His comments here would have great importance.}}
===Allegations of anti-Semitism===
Before the film was even released, there were prominent criticisms of perceived ] content in the movie. ] told ] Assemblyman ] they had passed on distributing the film in response to a protest outside the ] building. Hikind warned other movie companies that "they should not distribute this film. This is unhealthy for ]s all over the world."<ref name=FOXpass />


====Allegations of antisemitism====
A joint committee of the Secretariat for Ecumenical and Inter-religious Affairs of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Department of Inter-religious Affairs of the ] obtained a version of the script before it was released in theaters. They released a statement, calling it <blockquote> one of the most troublesome texts, relative to anti-Semitic potential, that any of us had seen in twenty-five years. It must be emphasized that the main storyline presented Jesus as having been relentlessly pursued by an evil cabal of Jews, headed by the high priest ], who finally ]ed a weak-kneed ] into putting Jesus to death. This is precisely the storyline that fueled centuries of anti-Semitism within Christian societies. This is also a storyline rejected by the ] at ] in its document '']'', and by nearly all mainline ] churches in parallel documents . . . . Unless this basic storyline has been altered by Mr. Gibson, a fringe Catholic who is building his own church in the ] area and who apparently accepts neither the teachings of Vatican II nor modern biblical scholarship, ''The Passion of the Christ'' retains a real potential for undermining the repudiation of classical Christian anti-Semitism by the churches in the last forty years.<ref>{{cite journal
Before the film was released, there were prominent criticisms of perceived ] content in the film. It was for that reason that 20th Century Fox decided to pass on the film, informing New York Assemblyman ] that a protest outside the ] made them decide against distributing the film. Hikind warned other companies that "they should not distribute this film. This is unhealthy for Jews all over the world."<ref name=FOXpass />
| last = Pawlikowski
| first = John T.
| title = Christian Anti-Semitism: Past History, Present Challenges Reflections in Light of Mel Gibson's ''The Passion of the Christ''
| journal = Journal of Religion and Film
| date = February 2004
| url = http://www.unomaha.edu/jrf/2004Symposium/Pawlikowski.htm
| accessdate = }}</ref></blockquote>


A joint committee of the Secretariat for Ecumenical and Inter-religious Affairs of the ] and the Department of Inter-religious Affairs of the ] obtained a version of the script before it was released in theaters. They released a statement, calling it <blockquote>one of the most troublesome texts, relative to anti-Semitic potential, that any of us had seen in 25 years. It must be emphasized that the main storyline presented Jesus as having been relentlessly pursued by an evil cabal of Jews, headed by the high priest ], who finally blackmailed a weak-kneed ] into putting Jesus to death. This is precisely the storyline that fueled centuries of anti-Semitism within Christian societies. This is also a storyline rejected by the Roman Catholic Church at ] in its document '']'', and by nearly all mainline Protestant churches in parallel documents...Unless this basic storyline has been altered by Mr. Gibson, a fringe Catholic who is building his own church in the Los Angeles area and who apparently accepts neither the teachings of Vatican II nor modern biblical scholarship, ''The Passion of the Christ'' retains a real potential for undermining the repudiation of classical Christian anti-Semitism by the churches in the last 40 years.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Pawlikowski|first=John T.|title=Christian Anti-Semitism: Past History, Present Challenges Reflections in Light of Mel Gibson's ''The Passion of the Christ''|journal=Journal of Religion and Film|date=February 2004|url=http://www.unomaha.edu/jrf/2004Symposium/Pawlikowski.htm|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060820085751/http://www.unomaha.edu/jrf/2004Symposium/Pawlikowski.htm|archive-date=August 20, 2006}}</ref></blockquote>
The ADL itself also released a statement about the yet to be released movie:
<blockquote>For filmmakers to do justice to the biblical accounts of the passion, they must complement their artistic vision with sound scholarship, which includes knowledge of how the passion accounts have been used historically to disparage and attack Jews and Judaism. Absent such scholarly and theological understanding, productions such as ''The Passion'' could likely falsify history and fuel the animus of those who hate Jews.<ref>{{cite press release
| title = ADL Statement on Mel Gibson's 'The Passion'
| publisher = ]
| date =2003-06-24
| url = http://www.adl.org/presrele/mise_00/4275_00.asp
| accessdate =2008-08-20 }}</ref></blockquote> ], the head of the ] organisation, criticized this statement, and said of Foxman, the head of the ADL, "what he is saying is that the only way to escape the wrath of Foxman is to repudiate your faith."<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.forward.com/articles/6434/ | title="Passion" Critics Endanger Jews, Angry Rabbis Claim, Attacking Groups, Foxman | author=Nacha Cattan | publisher=The Jewish Daily Forward | date=2004-03-05 }}</ref>


The ADL itself also released a statement about the yet-to-be-released film:
In '']'', reviewer ] said, "Gibson has violated just about every precept of the (United States Conference of Catholic Bishops) conference's own 1988 "Criteria" for the portrayal of Jews in dramatizations of the Passion (no bloodthirsty Jews, no rabble, no use of Scripture that reinforces negative stereotypes of Jews, etc.) ... The priests have big noses and gnarly faces, lumpish bodies, yellow teeth; ] and his court are a bizarre collection of oily-haired, ] perverts. The "good Jews" look like Italian movie stars (Italian sex symbol ] is ]); Mary, who would have been around 50 and appeared 70, could pass for a ripe 35."<ref name="pollitt">{{cite news
<blockquote>For filmmakers to do justice to the biblical accounts of the passion, they must complement their artistic vision with sound scholarship, which includes knowledge of how the passion accounts have been used historically to disparage and attack Jews and Judaism. Absent such scholarly and theological understanding, productions such as ''The Passion'' could likely falsify history and fuel the ] of those who hate Jews.<ref>{{cite press release|title=ADL Statement on Mel Gibson's 'The Passion'|publisher=]|date=June 24, 2003|url=http://www.adl.org/presrele/mise_00/4275_00.asp|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080723132238/http://adl.org/PresRele/Mise_00/4275_00.asp|archive-date=July 23, 2008}}</ref></blockquote> ], the head of the ] organization, criticized this statement, and said of ], the head of the ADL, "what he is saying is that the only way to escape the wrath of Foxman is to repudiate your faith".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.forward.com/articles/6434/|title='Passion' Critics Endanger Jews, Angry Rabbis Claim, Attacking Groups, Foxman|first=Nacha|last=Cattan|work=]|date=March 5, 2004|access-date=October 22, 2008|archive-date=December 4, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081204082817/http://www.forward.com/articles/6434/|url-status=live}}</ref>
| last = Pollitt
| first = Katha
| coauthors =
| title = The Protocols of Mel Gibson
| work =
| pages =
| language =
| publisher = '']''
|date=2004-03-11
| url = http://www.thenation.com/doc/20040329/pollitt
| accessdate = 2008-08-20 }}</ref> ] priest Fr. ], S.J., of ] – and the film's ] dialogue translator – specifically disagreed with that assessment, and disagreed with concerns that the film accused the Jewish community of ].<ref>{{cite news
| last = Wooden
| first = Cindy
| title = As filming ends, `Passion' strikes some nerves
| publisher = '']''
|date=2003-05-02
| url = http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_26_39/ai_101680926
| accessdate = 2008-08-20 }}</ref>


In '']'', reviewer ] wrote: "Gibson has violated just about every precept of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops own 1988 'Criteria' for the portrayal of Jews in dramatizations of the Passion (no bloodthirsty Jews, no rabble, no use of Scripture that reinforces negative stereotypes of Jews.) The priests have big noses and gnarly faces, lumpish bodies, yellow teeth; ] and his court are a bizarre collection of oily-haired, ] perverts. The 'good Jews' look like Italian movie stars (Magdalene actually ''is'' an Italian movie star, ]); ], who would have been around 50 and appeared 70, could pass for a ripe 35."<ref name="pollitt">{{cite news|last=Pollitt|first=Katha|title=The Protocols of Mel Gibson|work=]|date=March 11, 2004|url=http://www.thenation.com/article/protocols-mel-gibson|access-date=August 20, 2008|archive-date=October 18, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101018024641/http://www.thenation.com/article/protocols-mel-gibson|url-status=dead}}</ref> Jesuit priest Fr. ], S.J. of Loyola Marymount University—and the film's translator for ] dialogue—specifically disagreed with that assessment, and disagreed with concerns that the film accused the Jewish community of ].<ref>{{cite news|last=Wooden|first=Cindy|title=As filming ends, 'Passion' strikes some nerves|work=]|date=May 2, 2003|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_26_39/ai_101680926|access-date=August 20, 2008|archive-date=December 6, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081206160324/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_26_39/ai_101680926|url-status=dead}}</ref>
One specific scene in the movie perceived as an example of anti-Semitism was in the dialogue of Caiaphas, when he states "His blood on us and on our children!", a quote historically interpreted by some as a curse taken upon by the Jewish people. Certain Jewish groups asked this be removed from the film. However, only the subtitles were removed; the original dialogue remains in the Aramaic soundtrack.<ref>{{cite news
| last = Vermes
| first = Geza
| title = Celluloid brutality
| publisher = '']''
|date=2003-02-27
| url = http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,4120,1157381,00.html
| accessdate = 2008-08-20
| location=London}}</ref>


In '']'', Jewish biblical scholar and expert on the ], ] wrote a highly critical review of the movie: he stated that the movie is "horribly gory, historically wrong - and it will inspire judeophobia". According to Vermes, "the real problem is not with his attitudes or avowed intentions, but with the lack of appropriate steps taken to prevent visual images from inspiring judeophobia. ] and his priestly colleagues often struggle not to smile when they see the defeat of Christ. In the film they allow their policemen to beat him up in open court without protest. In the Gospels itself they are depicted as doing things according to the book and reject the witnesses who testify against Jesus. This does not seem to be so in the film. These are dangerous opportunities for inspiring vengeful sentiments".<ref>{{Cite web|last=Vermes|first=Geza|date=2004-02-27|title=Geza Vermes: Christ film will inspire Judeophobia|url=http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/feb/27/religion.film|access-date=2022-01-11|website=The Guardian|language=en|archive-date=June 8, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240608212724/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/feb/27/religion.film|url-status=live}}</ref>
When asked about this scene, Gibson said, "I wanted it in. My brother said I was wimping out if I didn't include it. But, man, if I included that in there, they'd be coming after me at my house. They'd come to kill me."<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.seethepassion.com/article.php?id=21 | title=The Jesus War}}</ref> In another interview when asked about the scene, he said, "It's one little passage, and I believe it, but I don't and never have believed it refers to Jews, and implicates them in any sort of curse. It's directed at all of us, all men who were there, and all that came after. His blood is on us, and that's what Jesus wanted. But I finally had to admit that one of the reasons I felt strongly about keeping it, aside from the fact it's true, is that I didn't want to let someone else dictate what could or couldn't be said."<ref>{{cite news | title=Mel Gibson and Other "Passion" Filmakers say the Movie was Guided by Faith | publisher= Detroit Free Press | author=Terry Lawson | date=2004-02-17}}</ref>


One specific scene in the film perceived as an example of anti-Semitism was in the dialogue of Caiaphas, when he states " on us and on our children!]]" (Mt 27:25), a quote historically interpreted by some as a curse taken upon by the Jewish people. Certain Jewish groups asked this be removed from the film. However, only the subtitles were removed; the original dialogue remains in the Hebrew soundtrack.<ref>{{cite news|last=Vermes|first=Geza|title=Celluloid brutality|newspaper=]|date=February 27, 2003|url=http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,4120,1157381,00.html|access-date=August 20, 2008|location=London|archive-date=May 17, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080517043555/http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,4120,1157381,00.html|url-status=live}}</ref> When asked about this scene, Gibson said: "I wanted it in. My brother said I was wimping out if I didn't include it. But, man, if I included that in there, they'd be coming after me at my house. They'd come to kill me."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.seethepassion.com/article.php?id=21|title=The Jesus War|access-date=June 9, 2008|archive-date=December 16, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081216053841/http://www.seethepassion.com/article.php?id=21|url-status=live}}</ref> In another interview when asked about the scene, he said, "It's one little passage, and I believe it, but I don't and never have believed it refers to Jews, and implicates them in any sort of curse. It's directed at all of us, all men who were there, and all that came after. His blood is on us, and that's what Jesus wanted. But I finally had to admit that one of the reasons I felt strongly about keeping it, aside from the fact it's true, is that I didn't want to let someone else dictate what could or couldn't be said."<ref>{{cite news|title=Mel Gibson and Other 'Passion' Filmakers say the Movie was Guided by Faith|work=Detroit Free Press|first=Terry|last=Lawson|date=February 17, 2004}}{{dead link|date=October 2013}}</ref>
In the '']'', Leon Wieseltier said: "In its representation of its Jewish characters, ''The Passion of the Christ'' is without any doubt an anti-Semitic movie, and anybody who says otherwise knows nothing, or chooses to know nothing, about the visual history of anti-Semitism, in art and in film. What is so shocking about Gibson's Jews is how unreconstructed they are in their stereotypical appearances and actions. These are not merely anti-Semitic images; these are classically anti-Semitic images."<ref>{{cite web | url=https://ssl.tnr.com/p/docsub.mhtml?i=20040308&s=wieseltier030804 | title=The Passion of the Christ | date=2004-03-08 | author=Leon Wieseltier | publisher=The New Republic}}</ref>


The allegations of antisemitism were satirized in the '']'' episode "]", which focuses on the reactions of the protagonists to the film. In the episode, ] leads a neo-Nazi rally whilst dressed as ], ] has nightmares about the excessive violence and complains about the Jews' apparent responsibility for the death of Jesus, and ] and ] go to Mel Gibson to get a refund.<ref name="forward">{{Cite web|url=https://forward.com/news/israel/5445/e2-80-98the-passion-of-the-christ-e2-80-99-fuels-antisemitism/|title='The Passion of the Christ' Fuels Antisemitism — on 'South Park'|author=Max Gross|work=The Jewish Daily Forward|date=April 9, 2004|access-date=March 7, 2022|archive-date=March 7, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220307201029/https://forward.com/news/israel/5445/e2-80-98the-passion-of-the-christ-e2-80-99-fuels-antisemitism/|url-status=live}}</ref>
Asked by ] if his movie would "upset Jews", Gibson responded, "It's not meant to. I think it's meant to just tell the truth. I want to be as truthful as possible."<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101030127-409570,00.html | title=The Passion of Mel Gibson | work=Time | date=2003-01-19 | accessdate=2010-05-25 | first=Richard | last=Corliss}}</ref> In a '']'' newspaper interview, he added, "If anyone has distorted Gospel passages to rationalize cruelty towards Jews or anyone, it's in defiance of repeated Papal condemnation. The ] has condemned ] in any form... Jesus died for the sins of all times, and I'll be the first on the line for culpability".<ref>{{cite news | title=Mel Gibson Interview | publisher=Globe and Mail | date=2004-02-14}}</ref>


Allegations of the film's antisemitism were intensified after Mel Gibson's 2006 arrest for ] in Malibu, California, where during the arrest, he made antisemitic remarks against the arresting officer. He was recorded saying to the officer, "Fucking Jews... the Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world. Are you a Jew?"<ref>{{cite news|last=Weiner|first=Allison Hope|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/30/us/30gibson.html|work=]|title=Mel Gibson Apologizes for Tirade After Arrest|date=July 30, 2006|access-date=June 6, 2020|archive-date=June 13, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200613121700/https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/30/us/30gibson.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=tmz>{{cite news|url=https://www.tmz.com/2006/07/28/gibsons-anti-semitic-tirade-alleged-cover-up/|title=Gibson's Anti-Semitic Tirade Alleged Cover Up|work=]|date=July 28, 2006|access-date=June 6, 2020|archive-date=May 31, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200531031522/https://www.tmz.com/2006/07/28/gibsons-anti-semitic-tirade-alleged-cover-up/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Sara|last=Dover|url=http://www.ibtimes.com/james-mee-jewish-cop-who-arrested-mel-gibson-gets-trial-discrimination-suit-394898|title=James Mee: Jewish Cop Who Arrested Mel Gibson Gets Trial in Discrimination Suit|date=January 12, 2012|work=]|access-date=November 27, 2016|archive-date=February 10, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170210120815/http://www.ibtimes.com/james-mee-jewish-cop-who-arrested-mel-gibson-gets-trial-discrimination-suit-394898|url-status=live}}</ref>
Conservative columnist ] also tried to dispel the allegations of anti-Semitism, saying "To those in the Jewish community who worry that the film, which is scheduled for release next Easter season, might contain anti-Semitic elements, or encourage people to persecute Jews, fear not. The film does not indict Jews for the death of Jesus."<ref>{{cite web | url=http://townhall.com/columnists/CalThomas/2003/08/05/the_greatest_story_ever_filmed | title=The Greatest Story Ever Filmed | publisher=TownHall.com | date=2003-08-05 }}</ref> Two ]s, Rabbi Daniel Lapin and conservative talk-show host and author ], also vocally rejected claims that the film is anti-Semitic. They have noted the film's many sympathetic portrayals of Jews: ] (who helps Jesus carry the cross), ], the ], ], ], Veronica (who wipes Jesus' face and offers him water), and several Jewish priests who protest Jesus' arrest during ].


====Reactions to allegations of antisemitism====
Bob Smithouser of Plugged in Online believed that film was trying to convey the evils and sins of humanity rather than specifically targeting Jews, stating "The anthropomorphic portrayal of Satan as a player in these events brilliantly pulls the proceedings into the supernatural realm – a fact that should have quelled the much-publicized cries of anti-Semitism since it shows a diabolical force at work beyond any political and religious agendas of the Jews and Romans." <ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.pluggedin.com/videos/2005/q1/passionofthechrist.aspx | title=The Passion of the Christ | publisher=Pluggedin.com }}</ref>
] gave ''The Passion of the Christ'' a positive review and defended it against allegations of anti-semitism.]]
Film critic ], who awarded ''The Passion of the Christ'' four out of four stars in his review for the '']'', denied allegations that the film was anti-semitic. Ebert described the film as "a powerful and important film, helmed by a man with a sincere heart and a warrior's sense of justice. It is a story filled with searing images and ultimately a message of redemption and hope." Ebert said, "It also might just be the greatest cinematic version of the greatest story ever told."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Ebert |first1=Roger |title=Judge ye not Gibson's film until you've actually seen it |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/judge-ye-not-gibsons-film-until-youve-actually-seen-it |website=Chicago Sun-Times |date=30 March 2004 |access-date=22 March 2021 |archive-date=April 18, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210418035309/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/judge-ye-not-gibsons-film-until-youve-actually-seen-it |url-status=live }}</ref>


Conservative columnist ] also disagreed with allegations of antisemitism and wrote in '']'': "To those in the Jewish community who worry that the film might contain anti-Semitic elements, or encourage people to persecute Jews, fear not. The film does not indict Jews for the death of Jesus."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://townhall.com/columnists/CalThomas/2003/08/05/the_greatest_story_ever_filmed|title=The Greatest Story Ever Filmed|publisher=TownHall.com|date=August 5, 2003|access-date=October 22, 2008|archive-date=June 11, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110611143252/http://townhall.com/columnists/calthomas/2003/08/05/the_greatest_story_ever_filmed|url-status=dead}}</ref>
Moreover, Senior Vatican officer ], who has seen the film, addressed the matter so:
<blockquote>Anti-Semitism, like all forms of racism, distorts the truth in order to put a whole race of people in a bad light. This film does nothing of the sort. It draws out from the historical objectivity of the Gospel narratives sentiments of forgiveness, mercy, and reconciliation. It captures the subtleties and the horror of sin, as well as the gentle power of love and forgiveness, without making or insinuating blanket condemnations against one group. This film expressed the exact opposite, that learning from the example of Christ, there should never be any more violence against any other human being.<ref>{{cite news
| last = Gaspari
| first = Antonio
| title = The Cardinal & the ''Passion''
| publisher = ]
|date=2003-09-18
| url = http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-gaspari091803.asp
| accessdate = 2008-08-20 }}</ref></blockquote>


Bob Smithouser of ]'s ''Plugged In'' also believed that the film was trying to convey the evils and sins of humanity rather than specifically targeting Jews, stating: "The anthropomorphic portrayal of Satan as a player in these events brilliantly pulls the proceedings into the supernatural realm—a fact that should have quelled the much-publicized cries of anti-Semitism since it shows a diabolical force at work beyond any political and religious agendas of the Jews and Romans."<ref name=pluggedin/>
===Allegation of excessive violence===
Several critics were troubled by the film's explicitly detailed violence, and especially cautioned parents to avoid taking their children to the cinema. Although only one sentence in three of the Gospels mentions ], and it is unmentioned in the fourth, ''The Passion of the Christ'' devotes ten minutes to the portrayal of the flogging. Film critic ], who rated the movie four-out-of-four stars, said in his review:


Moreover, senior officer at the Vatican ], who had seen the film, addressed the matter so:
<blockquote>The movie is 126 minutes long, and I would guess that at least 100 of those minutes, maybe more, are concerned specifically and graphically with the details of the torture and death of Jesus. This is the most violent film I have ever seen.<ref>Roger Ebert, (review), February 24, 2004</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>Anti-Semitism, like all forms of racism, distorts the truth in order to put a whole race of people in a bad light. This film does nothing of the sort. It draws out from the historical objectivity of the Gospel narratives sentiments of forgiveness, mercy, and reconciliation. It captures the subtleties and the horror of sin, as well as the gentle power of love and forgiveness, without making or insinuating blanket condemnations against one group. This film expressed the exact opposite, that learning from the example of Christ, there should never be any more violence against any other human being.<ref>{{cite news|last=Gaspari|first=Antonio|title=The Cardinal & the ''Passion''|work=]|date=September 18, 2003|url=http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-gaspari091803.asp|access-date=2008-08-20|archive-date=September 19, 2003|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030919193930/http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-gaspari091803.asp|url-status=live}}</ref></blockquote>


Asked by ] if his movie would "upset Jews", Gibson responded, "It's not meant to. I think it's meant to just tell the truth. I want to be as truthful as possible."<ref>{{cite magazine|url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101030127-409570,00.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041026072423/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101030127-409570,00.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=October 26, 2004|title=The Passion of Mel Gibson|magazine=Time|date=January 19, 2003|access-date=May 25, 2010|first=Richard|last=Corliss}}</ref> In an interview for '']'', he added: "If anyone has distorted Gospel passages to rationalize cruelty towards Jews or anyone, it's in defiance of repeated Papal condemnation. The Papacy has condemned racism in any form...Jesus died for the sins of all times, and I'll be the first on the line for culpability."<ref>{{cite news|title=Mel Gibson Interview|work=The Globe and Mail|date=February 14, 2004}}</ref>
Ebert also mentioned that the R-rated film merits the ] NC-17 rating in a "Movie Answer Man" response, adding that no level-minded parent should ever allow children to see it.<ref></ref>


====Criticism of excessive violence====
], in '']'', said, "'The Passion of the Christ' is so relentlessly focused on the savagery of Jesus' final hours that this film seems to arise less from love than from wrath, and to succeed more in assaulting the spirit than in uplifting it."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9A07EFD6143CF936A15751C0A9629C8B63|author=A. O. Scott|title=Good and Evil Locked In Violent Showdown|publisher=The New York Times|date=2004-02-25|accessdate= Retrieved July 8, 2007.}} {{Dead link|date=August 2010|bot=RjwilmsiBot}}</ref> ], ]'s film critic, dubbed the film "a two-hour-and-six-minute ] – ''The Jesus Chainsaw Massacre'' – that thinks it's an act of faith", and further criticised Gibson for focusing on the brutality of Jesus' execution, instead of his religious teachings.<ref>{{cite web | title=Jesus H. Christ | author=David Edelstein| url=http://www.slate.com/id/2096025/ | publisher=Slate Magazine}}</ref>
] in '']'' wrote "''The Passion of the Christ'' is so relentlessly focused on the savagery of Jesus' final hours that this film seems to arise less from love than from wrath, and to succeed more in assaulting the spirit than in uplifting it."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9A07EFD6143CF936A15751C0A9629C8B63 |author=A. O. Scott |title=Good and Evil Locked in Violent Showdown |newspaper=The New York Times |date=February 25, 2004 |access-date=July 8, 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120213071647/http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9A07EFD6143CF936A15751C0A9629C8B63 |archive-date=February 13, 2012 }}</ref> ], ''Slate''{{'}}s film critic, dubbed the film "a two-hour-and-six-minute snuff movie—''The Jesus ]''—that thinks it's an act of faith", and further criticized Gibson for focusing on the brutality of Jesus' execution, instead of his religious teachings.<ref name="Edelstein 2004 Slate"/>


In 2008, writer Michael Gurnow in ] stated much the same, labeling the work a mainstream ].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thesecularparent.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/American-Atheists-April-2008-issue.pdf |author=Gurnow, Michael|date=April 2008|title=The passion of the snuff: how the MPAA allowed a horror film to irreparably scar countless young minds in the name of religion|publisher=]|pages=17–18|access-date=February 17, 2014|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150218074258/http://www.thesecularparent.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/American-Atheists-April-2008-issue.pdf|archive-date=February 18, 2015}}</ref> Critic Armond White, in his review of the film for Africana.com, offered another perspective on the violence in the film. He wrote, "Surely Gibson knows (better than anyone in Hollywood is willing to admit) that violence sells. It's problematic that this time, Gibson has made a film that asks for a sensitive, serious, personal response to violence rather than his usual glorifying of vengeance."<ref name="White, Armond"/>
During ]'s interview of him, Gibson said:
<blockquote>I wanted it to be shocking; and I wanted it to be extreme ... So that they see the enormity – the enormity of that sacrifice; to see that someone could endure that and still come back with love and forgiveness, even through extreme pain and suffering and ridicule. The actual crucifixion was more violent than what was shown on the film, but I thought no one would get anything out of it. </blockquote>


During Diane Sawyer's interview of him, Gibson said:
==Response from evangelicals==
<blockquote>I wanted it to be shocking; and I wanted it to be extreme...So that they see the enormity of that sacrifice; to see that someone could endure that and still come back with love and forgiveness, even through extreme pain and suffering and ridicule. The actual crucifixion was more violent than what was shown on the film, but I thought no one would get anything out of it.</blockquote>
''The Passion of the Christ'' received support and endorsement from most known evangelical leaders and representatives of USA's conservative church organizations: ], ], Mission America Coalition, ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], Mothers of Pre-Schoolers (MOPS).<ref>{{cite web | title = Comments about Mel Gibsons the Passion of the Christ | url = http://www.seekgod.ca/gibsoncomments.htm | accessdate =2008-04-10 }}{{Self-published inline|date=July 2010}}</ref> The ] stated that many of its members, like other Christians, felt that the movie was a good way to ] non-believers.<ref name="UMNS">{{cite web|url = http://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?ptid=1&mid=3316| title = Many churches look to 'Passion' as evangelism tool|publisher = ]|accessdate = 2009–06–07}}</ref> As a result, many congregations planned to be at the theaters, some of whom set up tables to answer questions and share ].<ref name="UMNS"/>{{quote|They feel the film presents a unique opportunity to share Christianity in a way today’s public can identify with.|Rev. John Tanner|] of Cove United Methodist Church, Hampton Cove, Alabama<ref name="UMNS"/>}}


==Accolades== ==Planned sequel==
Reports and rumors of a sequel have circulated for years. In June 2016, writer ] stated that he and Gibson had begun work on a sequel to ''The Passion of the Christ'' which will focus on the ], and the events surrounding the resurrection.<ref name="Sequel_THR">{{cite web|url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/mel-gibson-planning-passion-christ-901299/|work=The Hollywood Reporter|title=Mel Gibson Planning 'Passion of the Christ' Sequel (Exclusive)|author=Bond, Paul|date=June 9, 2016|accessdate=July 6, 2023|archive-date=July 7, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230707162318/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/mel-gibson-planning-passion-christ-901299/|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2018, Caviezel said that Gibson had sent him the third draft of the screenplay.<ref name="Sequel_Aleteia">{{cite news|last=Burger|first=John|title=Jim Caviezel to play Jesus again in sequel to 'The Passion of Christ'|url=https://aleteia.org/2020/09/25/jim-caviezel-to-play-jesus-again-in-sequel-to-the-passion-of-christ/|access-date=October 7, 2020|work=]|publisher=Aleteia SAS|date=September 25, 2020|archive-date=October 31, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211031122531/https://aleteia.org/2020/09/25/jim-caviezel-to-play-jesus-again-in-sequel-to-the-passion-of-christ/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Sequel_EI">{{cite news|last=Guno|first=Nina V.|title='Passion of the Christ 2' is coming, says Jim Caviezel|url=https://entertainment.inquirer.net/391636/passion-of-the-christ-2-is-coming-says-jim-caviezel|access-date=October 7, 2020|newspaper=]|publisher=INQUIRER.net|date=September 24, 2020|archive-date=October 31, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211031122530/https://entertainment.inquirer.net/391636/passion-of-the-christ-2-is-coming-says-jim-caviezel|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2020, Caviezel said that it would be titled ''The Passion of the Christ: Resurrection'' and predicted, "It's going to be the biggest film in world history."<ref name="Sequel_CBN">{{cite web|url=https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/entertainment/2020/september/the-passion-of-the-christ-sequel-ahead-actor-says-it-will-be-biggest-film-in-world-history|work=Christian Broadcast Network|title='Resurrection': Actor Jim Caviezel Reveals Third Draft for 'Passion of The Christ' Sequel|author=Morris, Andrea|date=September 14, 2020|accessdate=July 6, 2023|archive-date=March 19, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230319060331/https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/entertainment/2020/september/the-passion-of-the-christ-sequel-ahead-actor-says-it-will-be-biggest-film-in-world-history|url-status=live}}</ref>
;Wins
* ], Award for Freedom of Expression (2004)
* ] – Favorite Motion Picture Drama (2004)
* ] – ] – ]
* ] Moviegoer Awards – Best Picture
* ] – Best Film Production
* ] – Best Film Actress – ]
* ] – Best Sound Editing in a Feature Film – Music – Michael T. Ryan
* Golden Knight Film Festival – Grand Prix – ]
* Golden Knight Film Festival – Best Actor – ]
* ] / ] / ] – Consumers Choice for Favorite Movie Award
* ] –ASCAP Henry Mancini Award – ]
* ], USA – Hollywood Producer of the Year – ]
* Catholics in Media Associates – Film Award – ]
* Cinema Writers Circle Awards, Spain – Best Foreign Film
* ], ''The Passion of the Christ Original Motion Picture Soundtrack'', Instrumental Album of the Year (2004)


In July 2023, Gibson stated that the sequel was "coming soon", and that he was working on two versions of the script, saying, "one of them is a very structured and very strong script and kind of more what one should expect and the other is like an ]."<ref name="Sequel_CS">{{cite web|url=https://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/1302836-the-passion-of-the-christ-2-is-like-an-acid-trip-mel-gibson#:~:text=%E2%80%9CI%20have%20two%20scripts%20and,It's%20like%20crazy.%E2%80%9D|work=ComingSoon|title=The Passion of the Christ 2 Is 'Like an Acid Trip,' Says Mel Gibson|author=Dela Paz, Maggie|date=July 4, 2023|accessdate=July 6, 2023|archive-date=July 6, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230706010042/https://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/1302836-the-passion-of-the-christ-2-is-like-an-acid-trip-mel-gibson#:~:text=%E2%80%9CI%20have%20two%20scripts%20and,It's%20like%20crazy.%E2%80%9D|url-status=live}}</ref> In September 2024, Gibson had reportedly begun scouting various locations with a production team in Europe.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Vivarelli |first=Nick |date=2024-09-19 |title=Mel Gibson Is Scouting Locations in Europe for 'The Passion of the Christ' Sequel |url=https://variety.com/2024/film/global/mel-gibson-scouting-locations-passion-of-the-christ-sequel-1236150494/ |access-date=2024-09-19 |website=Variety |language=en-GB}}</ref>
;Nominations
* ], USA – Oscar for '']'' (2004) – ]
* Academy Awards, USA – Oscar for '']'' (2004) – ], ]
* Academy Awards, USA – Oscar for '']'' (2004) – ]
* ], USA – ASC Award for ''Outstanding Achievement in Cinematography in Theatrical Releases'' (2004) – ]
* ] Golden Reel Award for Best Sound Editing for Music in a Feature Film (2004)
* ] – BFCA Award for ''Best Popular Movie'' (2004)
* ] – Jameson People's Choice Award for Best International Film
* ] – Best Sound Editing in Domestic Features – Dialogue & ADR
* ] – Best male performance – ]


==See also== ==See also==
{{Portal box|Christianity|Film}} {{Portal|Christianity|Film|United States}}
* ] *]
** ]
** ]
* ]
* "]"


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist|2}} {{Reflist}}


==External links== ==External links==
{{Wikiquote|The Passion of the Christ}} {{Wikiquote|The Passion of the Christ}}
*{{IMDb title|0335345|The Passion of the Christ}}
* {{Official website|http://www.thepassionofchrist.com/}}
* {{IMDb title|0335345|The Passion of the Christ}} *{{TCMDb title|538344|The Passion of the Christ}}
* {{allrovi movie|290960|The Passion of the Christ}} *{{Mojo title|passionofthechrist|The Passion of the Christ}}
* {{mojo title|passionofthechrist|The Passion of the Christ}} *{{Metacritic film|title=The Passion of the Christ}}
* {{rotten-tomatoes|passion_of_the_christ|The Passion of the Christ}} *{{Rotten Tomatoes|passion_of_the_christ|The Passion of the Christ}}

* {{metacritic film|the-passion-of-the-christ|The Passion of the Christ}}
{{Mel Gibson}}
*
{{Authority control}}


{{Mel Gibson Films}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Passion Of The Christ}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Passion Of The Christ}}
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
] ]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
]

]
{{Link FA|hy}}
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 04:08, 8 January 2025

2004 film by Mel Gibson This article is about the film. For the religious incident on which the film is based, see Passion of Jesus. For the set of paintings, see The Passion of Christ (Strasbourg).

The Passion of the Christ
The Passion of the Christ posterTheatrical release poster
Directed byMel Gibson
Screenplay by
Based on
Produced by
Starring
CinematographyCaleb Deschanel
Edited by
Music byJohn Debney
Production
company
Icon Productions
Distributed byNewmarket Films
Release date
  • February 25, 2004 (2004-02-25)
Running time127 minutes
CountryUnited States
Languages
  • Aramaic
  • Hebrew
  • Latin
Budget$30 million
Box office$612.1 million

The Passion of the Christ is a 2004 American epic biblical drama film co-written, co-produced, and directed by Mel Gibson. It stars Jim Caviezel as Jesus of Nazareth, Maia Morgenstern as Mary, mother of Jesus, and Monica Bellucci as Mary Magdalene. It depicts the Passion of Jesus largely according to the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. It also draws on pious accounts such as the Friday of Sorrows, along with other devotional writings, such as the reputed visions attributed to Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich.

As per the title, the film primarily covers the final 12 hours before Jesus Christ's death, known as "the Passion". It begins with the Agony in the Garden of Olives (i.e., Gethsemane), continues with the betrayal of Judas Iscariot, the brutal Scourging at the Pillar, the suffering of Mary as prophesied by Simeon, the crucifixion and death of Jesus, and ends with a brief depiction of his resurrection. The narrative is interspersed with moments in Jesus's life, such as The Last Supper and The Sermon on the Mount, and moments of Jesus' early life. The film was mostly shot in Italy. The dialogue is entirely in reconstructed Aramaic, Hebrew, and Latin. Although Gibson was initially against it, the film is subtitled.

The film was controversial and received polarized reviews from critics; some regarded the film a religious and holy experience, praising the performances of the cast, production values, and John Debney's musical score, while some found it to be antisemitic and the graphic violence to be extreme and emotionally draining. The film grossed over $612 million worldwide, and became the fifth highest-grossing film of 2004 internationally at the end of its theatrical run. It is the highest-grossing (inflation unadjusted) Christian film of all time, as well as the highest-grossing independent film of all time. It was the highest-grossing R-rated film in the US, at $370.8 million, a record which remained unbroken for 20 years. It received three nominations at the 77th Academy Awards in 2005, for Best Makeup, Best Cinematography, and Best Original Score. A sequel is in development.

Plot

On the night of Passover in Gethsemane, Jesus prays beside his disciples Peter, James and John. Satan tries to tempt Jesus as his sweat turns into blood and a serpent emerges from Satan's guise; Jesus rebukes him by crushing the serpent's head. Meanwhile, Judas Iscariot, another of Jesus' disciples, is bribed by Caiaphas and the Pharisees with thirty pieces of silver, and leads a group of temple guards to the forest where he betrays Jesus' identity. As the guards arrest Jesus, a fight erupts wherein Peter draws his dagger and slashes the ear of Malchus, the commander of the guards. Jesus heals Malchus' injury and reprimands Peter. As the disciples flee, the guards secure Jesus and beat him on the way to the Sanhedrin while a distraught Malchus remains behind.

Awoken from her sleep, Jesus' mother Mary senses something is wrong and speaks with Mary Magdalene. John informs them of the arrest, and they reunite with Peter who has followed Jesus and his captors. Caiaphas holds trial during which false accusations are made against Jesus. Some priests, who object to the trial and secretly support Jesus, are expelled from the court. When Jesus claims he is the divine Son of man, Caiaphas angrily tears his robes and Jesus is condemned to death for blasphemy. As Jesus is brutally beaten, Peter is confronted by the mob and he denies being a follower of Jesus. Remembering Jesus' precise prediction, he weeps bitterly and flees. Meanwhile, a guilt-ridden Judas attempts to return the money to have Jesus freed, but is refused by the priests. Judas then spits on the bag of silver and throws it at their feet and leaves. Haunted by demons throughout the night, he hangs himself outside Jerusalem.

Caiaphas and the crowd bring Jesus before Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor of Judea, to be condemned to death. At the urging of his wife Claudia, who knows Jesus is holy, and after questioning Jesus, Pilate finds no fault in him and transfers him to the court of Herod Antipas since Jesus is from Antipas' domain of Galilee. Antipas deems him to be a harmless fool and returns him. Pilate then offers the crowd the choice of freeing Jesus or a convicted murderer named Barabbas. The crowd demands Barabbas be freed and Jesus crucified. Attempting to appease the crowd, Pilate orders that Jesus simply be flogged. The Roman guards brutally scourge him with staves and whips until the Captain of the Guard, Abenader, stops them, blasting the torturers for taking the punishment too far.

After Jesus is dragged off, Mother Mary and Mary Magdalene clean up Jesus and Magdalene reminisces on Jesus saving her from a stoning during her darkest time. The Roman guards take Jesus to a barn where they place a crown of thorns on his head and hurl insults at him. He is presented before Pilate and the crowd, but Caiaphas, supported by the crowd, continues demanding that he be crucified. Unwilling to instigate an uprising, Pilate washes his hands and orders his crucifixion, claiming no responsibility.

Jesus then carries a heavy wooden cross on the road to Golgotha with two thieves, Dismas and Gesmas, following behind, while Satan observes his suffering sadistically. Along the way, he is constantly harassed by the guards and rampant mob, is comforted by his mother momentarily before being dragged away the guards, is helped with carrying the cross by the unwilling Simon of Cyrene, and is replenished by a woman who wipes his bloodied face with her veil before also being dragged away like Mary. At Golgotha, with Mary, Magdalene, John, and others witnessing, Jesus is crucified. One of the thieves, Gesmas, mocks Jesus suggesting he get off that cross to prove that he is the Son of God. He prays to God to forgive his tormentors, provides salvation to Dismas who is crucified beside him for his strong faith and repentance, and comforts his mother. Succumbing to his wounds, Jesus surrenders his spirit and dies. A single droplet of rain then falls, triggering an earthquake which damages the Second Temple and rips the veil covering the Holy of Holies in two. Both the thieves' legs are broken by the Romans to speed up their passing, and upon seeing Jesus dead, the Roman guard Cassius is ordered to thrust a spear into Jesus to be sure. Cassius does just that and is hit with the blood. The Roman soldiers who mocked and beat Jesus flee in terror while Satan screams in defeat from the depths of Hell. Jesus' body is taken down from the cross and entombed. Three days later, he rises from the dead and exits the tomb.

Cast

Themes

In The Passion: Photography from the Movie "The Passion of the Christ", director Mel Gibson says, "This is a movie about love, hope, faith and forgiveness. Jesus died for all mankind, suffered for all of us. It's time to get back to that basic message. The world has gone nuts. We could all use a little more love, faith, hope and forgiveness."

Source material

Biblical canon

According to Mel Gibson, the primary source material for The Passion of the Christ is the four canonical Gospel narratives of Christ's passion. The film includes a trial of Jesus at Herod's court, which is only found in the Gospel of Luke. The film also draws from other parts of the New Testament. One line spoken by Jesus in the film, "I make all things new", is found in the Book of Revelation, Chapter 21, verse 5.

The film also refers to the Old Testament. The film begins with an epigraph from the Fourth Song of the Suffering Servant from Isaiah. In the opening scene set in the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus crushes a serpent's head in direct visual allusion to Genesis 3:15. Throughout the film, Jesus quotes from the Psalms, beyond the instances recorded in the New Testament.

Traditional iconography and stories

Many of the depictions in the film deliberately mirror traditional representations of the Passion in art. For example, the 14 Stations of the Cross are central to the depiction of the Via Dolorosa in The Passion of the Christ. All the stations are portrayed except for the eighth station (Jesus meets the women of Jerusalem, a deleted scene on the DVD) and the fourteenth station (Jesus is laid in the tomb). Gibson was inspired by the representation of Jesus on the Shroud of Turin.

At the suggestion of actress Maia Morgenstern, the Passover Seder is quoted early in the film. Mary asks "Why is this night different from other nights?", and Mary Magdalene replies with the traditional response: "Because once we were slaves, and we are slaves no longer."

The conflation of Mary Magdalene with the adulteress saved from stoning by Jesus has some precedent in Catholic tradition, and according to the director was done for dramatic reasons. The names of some characters in the film are traditional and extra-Scriptural, such as the thieves crucified alongside the Christ, Dismas and Gesmas (also Gestas).

The film also took some inspiration from visions from Catholic visionaries such as Mary of Jesus of Ágreda and Anne Catherine Emmerich. The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ, a book by Clemens Brentano that details the visions of Anne Catherine Emmerich, was particularly inspiring to Gibson because it provided vivid descriptions of the crucifixion, as well as additional roles played by Mary, Jesus' mother.

The depiction of Veronica wiping the face of Jesus is from a Catholic tradition and relates to a relic known as the Veil of Veronica. The film slightly showed the veil bearing the image of the face of Jesus. Its origin lies in the sixth Station of the Cross, in which Saint Veronica wipes Jesus's face with her veil after he encounters her along the Via Dolorosa to Calvary.

Production

Script and language

Mel Gibson originally announced that he would use two old languages without subtitles and rely on "filmic storytelling". Because the story of the Passion is so well known, Gibson felt the need to avoid vernacular languages in order to surprise audiences: "I think it's almost counterproductive to say some of these things in a modern language. It makes you want to stand up and shout out the next line, like when you hear 'To be or not to be' and you instinctively say to yourself, 'That is the question.'" The script was written in English by Gibson and Benedict Fitzgerald, then translated by William Fulco, S.J., a professor at Loyola Marymount University, into Latin and reconstructed Aramaic. Fulco sometimes incorporated deliberate errors in pronunciations and word endings when the characters were speaking a language unfamiliar to them, and some of the crude language used by the Roman soldiers was not translated in the subtitles.

Filming

Matera, Italy

The film was produced independently and shot in Italy at Cinecittà Studios in Rome, and on location in the city of Matera and the ghost town of Craco, both in the Basilicata region. The estimated US$30 million production cost, plus an additional estimated $15 million in marketing costs, were fully borne by Gibson and his company Icon Productions. According to the DVD special feature, Martin Scorsese had recently finished his film Gangs of New York, from which Gibson and his production designers constructed part of their set. This saved Gibson a lot of time and money.

Gibson consulted several theological advisers during filming, including Fr. Jonathan Morris, and a local priest, Philip J. Ryan, who visited the set daily to provide counsel, Confession, and Holy Communion to Jim Caviezel. Masses were celebrated for cast and crew in several locations. There were other priests involved with the filming, including Abbé Michel Debourges from the Institute of Christ the King, Stephen Somerville, and Jean-Marie Charles-Roux, all of whom were asked by Mel Gibson to daily celebrate the Traditional Latin Mass. During filming, key set production assistant Jan Michelini was struck twice by lightning and hence nicknamed "Lighting Boy" as seen in the credits. Minutes later, Caviezel also was struck.

Music

Main article: The Passion of the Christ (soundtrack)

Three albums were released with Mel Gibson's co-operation: (1) the soundtrack of John Debney's original orchestral score conducted by Nick Ingman; (2) The Passion of the Christ: Songs, by producers Mark Joseph and Tim Cook, with original compositions by various artists, and (3) Songs Inspired by The Passion of the Christ. The first two albums each received a 2005 Dove award, and the soundtrack received an Academy Award nomination of Best Original Music Score. The music score frequently makes use of the wailing woman technique.

A preliminary score was composed and recorded by Lisa Gerrard and Patrick Cassidy, but was incomplete at film's release. Jack Lenz was the primary musical researcher and one of the composers; several clips of his compositions have been posted online.

Title change

Although Mel Gibson wanted to call his film The Passion, on October 16, 2003, his spokesman announced that the title used in the United States would be The Passion of Christ because Miramax Films had already registered the title The Passion with the MPAA for the 1987 novel by Jeanette Winterson. Later, the title was changed again to The Passion of the Christ for all markets.

Distribution and marketing

Gibson began production on his film without securing outside funding or distribution. In 2002, he explained why he could not get backing from the Hollywood studios: "This is a film about something that nobody wants to touch, shot in two dead languages." Gibson and his company Icon Productions provided the film's sole backing, spending about $30 million on production costs and an estimated $15 million on marketing. After early accusations of antisemitism, it became difficult for Gibson to find an American distribution company. 20th Century Fox initially had a first-look deal with Icon but decided to pass on the film in response to public protests. In order to avoid the spectacle of other studios turning down the film and to avoid subjecting the distributor to the same intense public criticism he had received, Gibson decided to distribute the film in the United States himself, with the aid of independent distributor Newmarket Films. Gibson handled the distribution and marketing on his own, whilst Newmarket assisted with shipping prints of the film and collecting the revenue from theaters.

Gibson departed from the usual film marketing formula. He employed a small-scale television advertising campaign with no press junkets. Similar to marketing campaigns for earlier biblical films like The King of Kings, The Passion of the Christ was heavily promoted by many church groups, both within their organizations and to the public. Typical licensed merchandise like posters, T-shirts, coffee mugs and jewelry was sold through retailers and websites. The United Methodist Church stated that many of its members, like other Christians, felt that the film was a good way to evangelize non-believers. As a result, many congregations planned to be at the theaters, and some set up tables to answer questions and share prayers. Rev. John Tanner, pastor of Cove United Methodist Church in Hampton Cove, Alabama, said: "They feel the film presents a unique opportunity to share Christianity in a way today's public can identify with." The Seventh-day Adventist Church also expressed a similar endorsement of the picture. More than a dozen Catholic bishops and cardinals issued statements praising the film.

Evangelical support

The Passion of the Christ received enthusiastic support from the American evangelical community. Before the film's release, Gibson actively reached out to evangelical leaders seeking their support and feedback. With their help, Gibson organized and attended a series of pre-release screenings for evangelical audiences and discussed the making of the film and his personal faith. In June 2003 he screened the film for 800 pastors attending a leadership conference at New Life Church, pastored by Ted Haggard, then president of the National Association of Evangelicals. Gibson gave similar showings at Joel Osteen's Lakewood Church, Greg Laurie's Harvest Christian Fellowship, and to 3,600 pastors at a conference at Rick Warren's Saddleback Church in Lake Forest.

From the summer of 2003 to the film's release in February 2004, portions or rough cuts of the film were shown to over eighty audiences—many of which were evangelical audiences. The film additionally received public endorsements from evangelical leaders, including Rick Warren, Billy Graham, Robert Schuller, Darrell Bock, Christianity Today editor David Neff, Pat Robertson, Lee Strobel, Jerry Falwell, Max Lucado, Tim LaHaye and Chuck Colson.

Release

Box office and theatrical run

The Passion of the Christ opened in the United States on February 25, 2004 (Ash Wednesday, the beginning of Lent). It earned $83.8 million from 4,793 screens at 3,043 theaters in its opening weekend and a total of $125.2 million since its Wednesday opening, ranking it fourth overall in domestic opening weekend earnings for 2004 as well as the biggest weekend debut for a February release (until Fifty Shades of Grey was released). The film tied with The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King's record for having the highest five-day Wednesday opening. Moreover, The Passion of the Christ scored the second biggest opening weekend for any R-rated movie, behind The Matrix Reloaded. It went on to earn $370.8 million overall in the United States, and remained the highest grossing R-rated film in the domestic market (U.S. & Canada) for 20 years, before the record went to Deadpool & Wolverine in 2024 with a domestic gross of $395.6 million. The film sold an estimated 59.6 million tickets in the US in its initial theatrical run.

In the Philippines, a majority-Catholic country, the film was released on March 31, 2004, rated PG-13 by the Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB) and endorsed by the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP).

In Malaysia, government censors initially banned it completely, but after Christian leaders protested, the restriction was lifted, but only for Christian audiences, allowing them to view the film in specially designated theaters. In Israel, the film was not banned. However, it never received theatrical distribution because no Israeli distributor would market it.

Despite the many controversies and refusals by some governments to allow the film to be viewed in wide release, The Passion of the Christ earned $612 million worldwide. The film was also a relative success in certain countries with large Muslim populations, such as in Egypt, where it ranked 20th overall in its box office numbers for 2004. In addition, it witnessed immense popularity in countries like Jordan, Lebanon, Qatar, Syria, and the United Arab Emirates where political parallels with the Palestinian situation resonated with audiences. However, it was banned in Bahrain, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia for religious reasons, particularly for depicting Jesus contrary to Islamic teachings.

The film was the highest grossing non-English-language film of all time until 2017, when it was surpassed by Wolf Warrior 2.

The Passion Recut

The theatrical poster for The Passion Recut, which depicts Jesus without facial lacerations.

The Passion Recut, a re-edited version, was released in theaters on March 11, 2005, with five minutes of the most explicit violence deleted, in hopes of attracting more viewers and make the film approachable to consumers who found the original cut too gruesome. President of Newmarket Films Bob Berney stated, "I knew a lot of people that wanted to see it but couldn't go...They were just too nervous or squeamish". Gibson explained his reasoning for this re-edited version:

After the initial run in movie theaters, I received numerous letters from people all across the country. Many told me they wanted to share the experience with loved ones but were concerned that the harsher images of the film would be too intense for them to bear. In light of this I decided to re-edit The Passion of the Christ.

Gibson had anticipated for a PG-13 rating after editing the film to bring it closer to that rating. Though despite the re-editing, the Motion Picture Association of America still deemed The Passion Recut too violent for the PG-13 rating. But because Newmarket is not an MPAA signatory and hence does not have to comply with MPAA guidelines, they decided to release the film as unrated. On the Passion Recut's rating and appeal to wider audiences, Berney explained:

The goal was to try and reach toward a PG-13 level, but the MPAA felt it still was an R due to the overall intensity of the film, so we are going out unrated and perhaps it’s ultimately somewhere in between. The end result is a shift in tone and balance that makes the film more accessible to a wider audience, particularly those that had concerns about some of the extreme moments in the original version.

The film's re-release was an "experiment" for Newmarket and Icon, since the companies hoped for a four-week showing that would extended through Easter Sunday (March 27). Had the experiment succeeded, Newmarket and Icon would have released the film every year around Easter. However, the shortened film showed for three weeks in 960 theaters for a box office total of $567,692, minuscule compared to the $612,054,428 of The Passion. The BBFC classified the recut with a 15 rating, lower than the original cut's 18 rating.

Differences

During the scourging scene, the cat o' nine tails striking Jesus's flesh that resulted in blood squirting and his flesh being dislodged was omitted. In the crucifixion scene, the Roman soldiers nailing Jesus with blood spurting is cut, and the soldier strenuously dislocating Jesus's shoulder is trimmed; instead, the reaction shots of Mary and Jesus are shown. Incidentally, the scene in which the cross is flipped over and supernaturally suspended in air was also deleted, due to viewers not understanding what they saw.

On this edit's overall effect, Gibson further added, "I have toned down some of the more brutal scenes without removing them or compromising the impact of the film. By softening some of its more wrenching aspects, I hope to make the film and its message of love available to a wider audience".

Home media

On August 31, 2004, the film was released on VHS and DVD in North America by 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, which initially passed on theatrical distribution. As with the original theatrical release, the film's release on home video formats proved to be very popular. Early estimates indicated that over 2.4 million copies of the film were sold by 3:00 p.m., with a total of 4.1 million copies on its first day of sale. The film was available on DVD with English and Spanish subtitles and on VHS tape with English subtitles. The film was released on Blu-ray in North America as a two-disc Definitive Edition set on February 17, 2009. It was also released on Blu-ray in Australia a week before Easter.

Although the original DVD release sold well, it contained no bonus features other than a trailer, which provoked speculation about how many buyers would wait for a special edition to be released. On January 30, 2007, a two-disc Definitive Edition was released in the North American markets, and March 26 of that year elsewhere. It contains several documentaries, soundtrack commentaries, deleted scenes, outtakes, the 2005 unrated version, and the original 2004 theatrical version.

The British version of the two-disc DVD contains two additional deleted scenes. In the first, Jesus meets the women of Jerusalem (at the eighth station of the cross) and falls to the ground as the women wail around him, and Simon of Cyrene attempts to hold up the cross and help up Jesus simultaneously. Afterwards, while both are holding up the cross, Jesus says to the women weeping for him, "Do not weep for me, but for yourselves and for your children". In the second, Pilate washes his hands, turns to Caiaphas, and says: "Look you to it" (i.e., the Pharisees wish to have Jesus crucified). Pilate then turns to Abanader and says: "Do as they wish". The scene next shows Pilate calling to his servant, who is carrying a wooden board on which Pilate writes, "Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews", in Latin and Hebrew. He then holds the board above his head in full view of Caiaphas, who after reading it challenges Pilate on its content. Pilate replies angrily to Caiaphas in non-subtitled Hebrew. The disc contains only two deleted scenes in total. No other scenes from the movie are shown on disc 2.

On February 7, 2017, 20th Century Fox re-released the film on Blu-ray and DVD featuring the theatrical version and the edited version (The Passion Recut), where the graphic violence is reduced. The theatrical version features English and Spanish dubs; this marks the first time the film has ever been dubbed in another language.

Television broadcast

On April 17, 2011 (Palm Sunday), Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN) presented the film at 7:30 p.m. ET/PT, in the United States with multiple showings scheduled. The network had continued to air the film throughout the year, and particularly around Easter.

On March 29, 2013 (Good Friday), as a part of their special Holy Week programming, TV5 in the Philippines presented the Filipino-dubbed version of the film at 2:00 p.m. (PST, UTC+8). Its total broadcast ran for two hours, but excluding the advertisements, it would only run up for approximately one hour instead of its full run time of two hours and six minutes. It ended at 4:00 p.m. It has been rated SPG by the Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB) for themes, language and violence with some scenes censored for television. TV5 is the first broadcast network outside of the United States and dubbed the Vernacular Hebrew and Latin language to Filipino (through translating its supplied English subtitles).

Reception

Critical response

On Rotten Tomatoes, The Passion of the Christ holds an approval rating of 50% based on 276 critic reviews and an 80% rating based on more than 250,000 user reviews. The website's critical consensus reads: "Director Mel Gibson's zeal is unmistakable, but The Passion of the Christ will leave many viewers emotionally drained rather than spiritually uplifted." On Metacritic, the film has a weighted average of 47 out of 100, based on 44 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews". Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film a rare "A+" grade, however.

In a positive review for Time, its critic Richard Corliss called The Passion of the Christ "a serious, handsome, excruciating film that radiates total commitment." New York Press film critic Armond White praised Gibson's direction, comparing him to Carl Theodor Dreyer in how he transformed art into spirituality. White also noted that it was odd to see Director Mel Gibson offer audiences "an intellectual challenge" with the film. Roger Ebert from the Chicago Sun-Times gave the movie four out of four stars, calling it "the most violent film I have ever seen" as well as reflecting on how it struck him, a former altar boy: "What Gibson has provided for me, for the first time in my life, is a visceral idea of what the Passion consisted of. That his film is superficial in terms of the surrounding message—that we get only a few passing references to the teachings of Jesus—is, I suppose, not the point. This is not a sermon or a homily, but a visualization of the central event in the Christian religion. Take it or leave it."

In a negative review, Slate magazine's David Edelstein called it "a two-hour-and-six-minute snuff movie", and Jami Bernard of the New York Daily News felt it was "the most virulently anti-Semitic movie made since the German propaganda films of World War II". Writing for the Dallas Observer, Robert Wilonsky stated that he found the movie "too turgid to awe the nonbelievers, too zealous to inspire and often too silly to take seriously, with its demonic hallucinations that look like escapees from a David Lynch film; I swear I couldn't find the devil carrying around a hairy-backed midget anywhere in the text I read."

The June 2006 issue of Entertainment Weekly named The Passion of the Christ the most controversial film of all time, followed by Stanley Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange (1971). In 2010, Time listed it as one of the most "ridiculously violent" films of all time.

Accolades

Wins

Nominations

Controversies

Questions of historical and biblical accuracy

Despite criticisms that Gibson deliberately added material to the historical accounts of first-century Judea and biblical accounts of Christ's crucifixion, some scholars defend the film as not being primarily concerned with historical accuracy. Biblical scholar Mark Goodacre protested that he could not find one documented example of Gibson explicitly claiming the film to be historically accurate. Gibson has been quoted as saying: "I think that my first duty is to be as faithful as possible in telling the story so that it doesn't contradict the Scriptures. Now, so long as it didn't do that, I felt that I had a pretty wide berth for artistic interpretation, and to fill in some of the spaces with logic, with imagination, with various other readings." One such example is a scene in which Judas Iscariot is shown being tormented by demons in the form of children. Another scene shows Satan carrying a demonic baby during Christ's flogging, construed as a perversion of traditional depictions of the Madonna and Child, and also as a representation of Satan and the Antichrist. Gibson's description:

It's evil distorting what's good. What is more tender and beautiful than a mother and a child? So the Devil takes that and distorts it just a little bit. Instead of a normal mother and child, you have an androgynous figure holding a 40-year-old 'baby' with hair on his back. It is weird, it is shocking, it's almost too much—just like turning Jesus over to continue scourging him on his chest is shocking and almost too much, which is the exact moment when this appearance of the Devil and the baby takes place.

When asked about the film's faithfulness to the account given in the New Testament, Father Augustine Di Noia of the Vatican's Doctrinal Congregation replied: "Mel Gibson's film is not a documentary... but remains faithful to the fundamental structure common to all four accounts of the Gospels" and "Mel Gibson's film is entirely faithful to the New Testament".

Disputed papal endorsement

On December 5, 2003, Passion of the Christ co-producer Stephen McEveety gave a rough cut of the film to Archbishop Stanisław Dziwisz, the pope's secretary. Pope John Paul II watched the film in his private apartment with Archbishop Dziwisz that night, and later met with McEveety and Jan Michelini, an Italian and the movie's assistant director. On December 17, Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan reported John Paul II had said "It is as it was", citing McEveety, who said he heard it from Dziwisz. Noonan had emailed Joaquín Navarro-Valls, the head of the Vatican's press office, for confirmation before writing her column, surprised that the "famously close-mouthed" Navarro-Valls had approved the use of the "It is as it was" quote, and his emailed response stated he had no other comment at that time. National Catholic Reporter journalist John L. Allen Jr. published a similar account on the same day, quoting an unnamed senior Vatican official. Reuters and the Associated Press independently confirmed the story, citing Vatican sources.

A dispute emerged a few days later, when an anonymous Vatican official told Catholic News Service "There was no declaration, no judgment from the pope." But Allen defended his earlier reporting, saying that his official source was adamant about the veracity of the original story. Columnist Frank Rich for The New York Times wrote that the statement was "being exploited by the Gibson camp", and that when he asked Michelini about the meeting, Michelini said Dziwisz had reported the pope's words as "It is as it was", and said the pope also called the film "incredibile", an Italian word Michelini translated as "amazing". The following day, Archbishop Dziwisz told CNS, "The Holy Father told no one his opinion of this film." This denial resulted in a round of commentators who accused the film producers of fabricating a papal quote to market their movie.

According to Rod Dreher in the Dallas Morning News, McEveety was sent an email from papal spokesman Navarro-Valls that supported the Noonan account, and suggested "It is as it was" could be used as the leitmotif in discussions on the film and said to "Repeat the words again and again and again." Dreher emailed Navarro-Valls a copy of the email McEveety had received, and Navarro-Valls emailed Dreher back and said, "I can categorically deny its authenticity." Dreher opined that either Mel Gibson's camp had created "a lollapalooza of a lie", or the Vatican was making reputable journalists and filmmakers look like "sleazebags or dupes" and he explained:

Interestingly, Ms. Noonan reported in her Dec. 17 column that when she asked the spokesman if the pope had said anything more than "It is as it was," he e-mailed her to say he didn't know of any further comments. She sent me a copy of that e-mail, which came from the same Vatican email address as the one to me and to Mr. McEveety.

Noonan noted that she and Dreher had discovered the emails were sent by "an email server in the Vatican's domain" from a Vatican computer with the same IP address. The Los Angeles Times reported that, when it asked after the story first broke if the "It is as it was" quote was reliable, Navarro-Valls had responded "I think you can consider that quote as accurate." Allen noted that while Dziwisz stated that Pope John Paul II made no declaration about this movie, other Vatican officials were "continuing to insist" the pope did say it, and other sources claimed they had heard Dziwisz say the pope said it on other occasions, and Allen called the situation "kind of a mess". A representative from Gibson's Icon Productions expressed surprise at Dziwisz's statements after the correspondence and conversations between film representatives and the pope's official spokesperson, Navarro-Valls, and stated "there is no reason to believe that the pope's support of the film 'isn't as it was.'"

After speaking to Dziwisz, Navarro-Valls confirmed John Paul II had seen The Passion of the Christ, and released the following official statement:

The film is a cinematographic transposition of the historical event of the Passion of Jesus Christ according to the accounts of the Gospel. It is a common practice of the Holy Father not to express public opinions on artistic works, opinions that are always open to different evaluations of aesthetic character.

In a follow-up column in The Wall Street Journal, Noonan addressed the question of why the issues being raised were not just "a tempest in a teapot" and she explained:

The truth matters. What a pope says matters. And what this pontiff says about this film matters. The Passion, which is to open on Feb. 25, has been the focus of an intense critical onslaught since last summer. The film has been fiercely denounced as anti-Semitic, and accused of perpetuating stereotypes that will fan hatred against Jews. John Paul II has a long personal and professional history of opposing anti-Semitism, of working against it, and of calling for dialogue, respect and reconciliation between all religions. His comments here would have great importance.

Allegations of antisemitism

Before the film was released, there were prominent criticisms of perceived antisemitic content in the film. It was for that reason that 20th Century Fox decided to pass on the film, informing New York Assemblyman Dov Hikind that a protest outside the News Corporation Building made them decide against distributing the film. Hikind warned other companies that "they should not distribute this film. This is unhealthy for Jews all over the world."

A joint committee of the Secretariat for Ecumenical and Inter-religious Affairs of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Department of Inter-religious Affairs of the Anti-Defamation League obtained a version of the script before it was released in theaters. They released a statement, calling it

one of the most troublesome texts, relative to anti-Semitic potential, that any of us had seen in 25 years. It must be emphasized that the main storyline presented Jesus as having been relentlessly pursued by an evil cabal of Jews, headed by the high priest Caiaphas, who finally blackmailed a weak-kneed Pilate into putting Jesus to death. This is precisely the storyline that fueled centuries of anti-Semitism within Christian societies. This is also a storyline rejected by the Roman Catholic Church at Vatican II in its document Nostra aetate, and by nearly all mainline Protestant churches in parallel documents...Unless this basic storyline has been altered by Mr. Gibson, a fringe Catholic who is building his own church in the Los Angeles area and who apparently accepts neither the teachings of Vatican II nor modern biblical scholarship, The Passion of the Christ retains a real potential for undermining the repudiation of classical Christian anti-Semitism by the churches in the last 40 years.

The ADL itself also released a statement about the yet-to-be-released film:

For filmmakers to do justice to the biblical accounts of the passion, they must complement their artistic vision with sound scholarship, which includes knowledge of how the passion accounts have been used historically to disparage and attack Jews and Judaism. Absent such scholarly and theological understanding, productions such as The Passion could likely falsify history and fuel the animus of those who hate Jews.

Rabbi Daniel Lapin, the head of the Toward Tradition organization, criticized this statement, and said of Abraham Foxman, the head of the ADL, "what he is saying is that the only way to escape the wrath of Foxman is to repudiate your faith".

In The Nation, reviewer Katha Pollitt wrote: "Gibson has violated just about every precept of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops own 1988 'Criteria' for the portrayal of Jews in dramatizations of the Passion (no bloodthirsty Jews, no rabble, no use of Scripture that reinforces negative stereotypes of Jews.) The priests have big noses and gnarly faces, lumpish bodies, yellow teeth; Herod Antipas and his court are a bizarre collection of oily-haired, epicene perverts. The 'good Jews' look like Italian movie stars (Magdalene actually is an Italian movie star, Monica Bellucci); Jesus's mother, who would have been around 50 and appeared 70, could pass for a ripe 35." Jesuit priest Fr. William Fulco, S.J. of Loyola Marymount University—and the film's translator for Hebrew dialogue—specifically disagreed with that assessment, and disagreed with concerns that the film accused the Jewish community of deicide.

In The Guardian, Jewish biblical scholar and expert on the historical Jesus, Géza Vermes wrote a highly critical review of the movie: he stated that the movie is "horribly gory, historically wrong - and it will inspire judeophobia". According to Vermes, "the real problem is not with his attitudes or avowed intentions, but with the lack of appropriate steps taken to prevent visual images from inspiring judeophobia. Caiaphas and his priestly colleagues often struggle not to smile when they see the defeat of Christ. In the film they allow their policemen to beat him up in open court without protest. In the Gospels itself they are depicted as doing things according to the book and reject the witnesses who testify against Jesus. This does not seem to be so in the film. These are dangerous opportunities for inspiring vengeful sentiments".

One specific scene in the film perceived as an example of anti-Semitism was in the dialogue of Caiaphas, when he states "His blood on us and on our children!" (Mt 27:25), a quote historically interpreted by some as a curse taken upon by the Jewish people. Certain Jewish groups asked this be removed from the film. However, only the subtitles were removed; the original dialogue remains in the Hebrew soundtrack. When asked about this scene, Gibson said: "I wanted it in. My brother said I was wimping out if I didn't include it. But, man, if I included that in there, they'd be coming after me at my house. They'd come to kill me." In another interview when asked about the scene, he said, "It's one little passage, and I believe it, but I don't and never have believed it refers to Jews, and implicates them in any sort of curse. It's directed at all of us, all men who were there, and all that came after. His blood is on us, and that's what Jesus wanted. But I finally had to admit that one of the reasons I felt strongly about keeping it, aside from the fact it's true, is that I didn't want to let someone else dictate what could or couldn't be said."

The allegations of antisemitism were satirized in the South Park episode "The Passion of the Jew", which focuses on the reactions of the protagonists to the film. In the episode, Eric Cartman leads a neo-Nazi rally whilst dressed as Adolf Hitler, Kyle Broflovski has nightmares about the excessive violence and complains about the Jews' apparent responsibility for the death of Jesus, and Stan Marsh and Kenny McCormick go to Mel Gibson to get a refund.

Allegations of the film's antisemitism were intensified after Mel Gibson's 2006 arrest for driving under the influence in Malibu, California, where during the arrest, he made antisemitic remarks against the arresting officer. He was recorded saying to the officer, "Fucking Jews... the Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world. Are you a Jew?"

Reactions to allegations of antisemitism

Roger Ebert gave The Passion of the Christ a positive review and defended it against allegations of anti-semitism.

Film critic Roger Ebert, who awarded The Passion of the Christ four out of four stars in his review for the Chicago Sun-Times, denied allegations that the film was anti-semitic. Ebert described the film as "a powerful and important film, helmed by a man with a sincere heart and a warrior's sense of justice. It is a story filled with searing images and ultimately a message of redemption and hope." Ebert said, "It also might just be the greatest cinematic version of the greatest story ever told."

Conservative columnist Cal Thomas also disagreed with allegations of antisemitism and wrote in Townhall: "To those in the Jewish community who worry that the film might contain anti-Semitic elements, or encourage people to persecute Jews, fear not. The film does not indict Jews for the death of Jesus."

Bob Smithouser of Focus on the Family's Plugged In also believed that the film was trying to convey the evils and sins of humanity rather than specifically targeting Jews, stating: "The anthropomorphic portrayal of Satan as a player in these events brilliantly pulls the proceedings into the supernatural realm—a fact that should have quelled the much-publicized cries of anti-Semitism since it shows a diabolical force at work beyond any political and religious agendas of the Jews and Romans."

Moreover, senior officer at the Vatican Cardinal Darío Castrillón Hoyos, who had seen the film, addressed the matter so:

Anti-Semitism, like all forms of racism, distorts the truth in order to put a whole race of people in a bad light. This film does nothing of the sort. It draws out from the historical objectivity of the Gospel narratives sentiments of forgiveness, mercy, and reconciliation. It captures the subtleties and the horror of sin, as well as the gentle power of love and forgiveness, without making or insinuating blanket condemnations against one group. This film expressed the exact opposite, that learning from the example of Christ, there should never be any more violence against any other human being.

Asked by Bill O'Reilly if his movie would "upset Jews", Gibson responded, "It's not meant to. I think it's meant to just tell the truth. I want to be as truthful as possible." In an interview for The Globe and Mail, he added: "If anyone has distorted Gospel passages to rationalize cruelty towards Jews or anyone, it's in defiance of repeated Papal condemnation. The Papacy has condemned racism in any form...Jesus died for the sins of all times, and I'll be the first on the line for culpability."

Criticism of excessive violence

A.O. Scott in The New York Times wrote "The Passion of the Christ is so relentlessly focused on the savagery of Jesus' final hours that this film seems to arise less from love than from wrath, and to succeed more in assaulting the spirit than in uplifting it." David Edelstein, Slate's film critic, dubbed the film "a two-hour-and-six-minute snuff movie—The Jesus Chainsaw Massacre—that thinks it's an act of faith", and further criticized Gibson for focusing on the brutality of Jesus' execution, instead of his religious teachings.

In 2008, writer Michael Gurnow in American Atheists stated much the same, labeling the work a mainstream snuff film. Critic Armond White, in his review of the film for Africana.com, offered another perspective on the violence in the film. He wrote, "Surely Gibson knows (better than anyone in Hollywood is willing to admit) that violence sells. It's problematic that this time, Gibson has made a film that asks for a sensitive, serious, personal response to violence rather than his usual glorifying of vengeance."

During Diane Sawyer's interview of him, Gibson said:

I wanted it to be shocking; and I wanted it to be extreme...So that they see the enormity of that sacrifice; to see that someone could endure that and still come back with love and forgiveness, even through extreme pain and suffering and ridicule. The actual crucifixion was more violent than what was shown on the film, but I thought no one would get anything out of it.

Planned sequel

Reports and rumors of a sequel have circulated for years. In June 2016, writer Randall Wallace stated that he and Gibson had begun work on a sequel to The Passion of the Christ which will focus on the resurrection of Jesus, and the events surrounding the resurrection. In 2018, Caviezel said that Gibson had sent him the third draft of the screenplay. In 2020, Caviezel said that it would be titled The Passion of the Christ: Resurrection and predicted, "It's going to be the biggest film in world history."

In July 2023, Gibson stated that the sequel was "coming soon", and that he was working on two versions of the script, saying, "one of them is a very structured and very strong script and kind of more what one should expect and the other is like an acid trip." In September 2024, Gibson had reportedly begun scouting various locations with a production team in Europe.

See also

References

  1. "The Passion of the Christ (18)". British Board of Film Classification. February 18, 2004. Archived from the original on September 22, 2013. Retrieved June 2, 2013.
  2. ^ "The Passion of the Christ (2004)". Box Office Mojo. 2004. Archived from the original on January 29, 2009. Retrieved February 5, 2009.
  3. O'Malley, John (March 15, 2004). "A Movie, a Mystic, a Spiritual Tradition". America. Archived from the original on October 5, 2011.
  4. Corley, Kathleen E.; Webb, Robert Leslie (2004). Jesus and Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ. A&C Black. pp. 160–161. ISBN 0-8264-7781-X.
  5. Gracia, Jorge J. E. (2004). Mel Gibson's Passion and philosophy. Open Court. p. 145. ISBN 0-8126-9571-2.
  6. Dimare, Philip C., ed. (2011). Movies in American History: An Encyclopedia. Abc-Clio. p. 909. ISBN 978-1-59884-296-8.
  7. "The Passion of the Christ". Movie-Locations
  8. "The Passion of the Christ". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on June 13, 2020. Retrieved November 4, 2020.
  9. "Christian Movies at the Box Office". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on August 29, 2019. Retrieved April 23, 2019.
  10. Barker, Stephen (October 17, 2020). "The 10 Highest-Grossing Independent Films Of All Time". ScreenRant. Archived from the original on October 11, 2022. Retrieved October 11, 2022.
  11. "Top Lifetime Grosses by MPAA Rating — R". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 7, 2023.
  12. ^ Coyle, Jake. "With a $97M second weekend, 'Deadpool & Wolverine' sets a new high mark for R-rated films". Associated Press News. Retrieved August 4, 2024.
  13. Gibson, Mel (February 25, 2004), The Passion of the Christ, archived from the original on January 28, 2017, retrieved September 1, 2016
  14. The Holy Bible, Book of Revelation 21:5. Archived from the original on August 16, 2009. Retrieved October 16, 2008.
  15. The Holy Bible, Book of Isaiah 53:5. Archived from the original on August 15, 2009. Retrieved November 4, 2008.
  16. The Holy Bible, Book of Genesis 3:15. Archived from the original on August 16, 2009. Retrieved November 17, 2005.
  17. Cooney Carrillo, Jenny (February 26, 2004). "The Passion of Mel". Urbancinefile. Archived from the original on June 1, 2004.
  18. Abramowitz, Rachel (March 7, 2004). "Along came Mary; Mel Gibson was sold on Maia Morgenstern for 'Passion' at first sight". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on March 14, 2023.
  19. Bacon, Thomas (April 11, 2020). "Passion of the Christ: Every Scene NOT From The Bible (& Why They Were Included)". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on March 14, 2023. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
  20. Petty, Michael John (May 13, 2022). "The Passion Of The Christ Scenes That Aren't In The Bible". Looper. Archived from the original on March 14, 2023. Retrieved November 7, 2022.
  21. "Sixth Station, Way of the Cross 2011". www.vatican.va. Archived from the original on December 9, 2022. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
  22. "Mel Gibson's great passion: Christ's agony as you've never seen it". Zenit News Agency. March 6, 2003. Archived from the original on August 15, 2009. Retrieved October 17, 2019.
  23. "Translating the passion". Language Hat. March 8, 2004. Archived from the original on May 22, 2012. Retrieved November 21, 2008.
  24. Jarvis, Edward (2018). Sede Vacante: The Life and Legacy of Archbishop Thuc. Berkeley CA: The Apocryphile Press. pp. 13–14. ISBN 978-1949643022.
  25. "Latin Mass on Set of the Passion of the Christ". May 24, 2021. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved March 1, 2024.
  26. Susman, Gary (October 24, 2003). "Charged Performance". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on May 25, 2013. Retrieved March 31, 2013.
  27. Ross, Scott (March 28, 2008). "Behind the Scenes of 'The Passion' with Jim Caviezel". Archived from the original on June 2, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2013.
  28. "Jesus actor struck by lightning". BBC News. October 23, 2003. Archived from the original on September 17, 2007. Retrieved April 14, 2013.
  29. Dave Roos (May 25, 2004). "Wail watching". Salon.com. Archived from the original on April 30, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
  30. "Jack Lenz Bio". JackLenz.com. Archived from the original on October 17, 2015.
  31. "Clips of Musical Compositions by Jack Lenz". JackLenz.com. Archived from the original on October 17, 2015.
  32. Susman, Gary (October 16, 2004). "Napoleon Branding". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on December 22, 2008. Retrieved August 16, 2008.
  33. Vivarelli, Nick (September 23, 2002). "Gibson To Direct Christ Tale With Caviezel As Star". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on August 15, 2009. Retrieved October 20, 2008.
  34. Patsuris, Penelope (March 3, 2004). "What Mel's Passion Will Earn Him". Forbes.com. Archived from the original on June 8, 2024. Retrieved August 18, 2017.
  35. ^ "Fox passes on Gibson's 'The Passion'". Los Angeles Times. October 22, 2004. Archived from the original on June 8, 2024. Retrieved August 30, 2008.
  36. Horn, John (October 22, 2004). "Gibson to Market 'Christ' on His Own, Sources Say". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on December 24, 2008. Retrieved October 20, 2008.
  37. Cobb, Jerry (February 25, 2004). "Marketing 'The Passion of the Christ'". NBC News. Archived from the original on March 4, 2018. Retrieved April 16, 2020.
  38. Maresco, Peter A. (Fall 2004). "Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ: Market Segmentation, Mass Marketing and Promotion, and the Internet". Journal of Religion and Popular Culture. Archived from the original on July 5, 2008.
  39. ^ "Many churches look to 'Passion' as evangelism tool". United Methodist Church. Archived from the original on April 7, 2022. Retrieved June 7, 2009.
  40. "ANN News Analysis: Adventists and "The Passion of the Christ", Adventist News Network, 23 February 2004". Archived from the original on July 6, 2019. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
  41. What Catholics Have Said About “The Passion of the Christ”
  42. Pauley, John L.; King, Amy (2013). Woods, Robert H. (ed.). Evangelical Christians and Popular Culture. Vol. 1. Westport: Praeger Publishing. pp. 36–51. ISBN 978-0313386541.
  43. Pawley, p. 38.
  44. Pawley, p. 40.
  45. Pawley, pp. 40–41.
  46. ^ Pauley, p. 41.
  47. Fredriksen, Paula (2006). On 'The Passion of the Christ': Exploring the Issues Raised by the Controversial Movie. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520248533.
  48. Susman, Gary (March 2, 2004). "Passion ties record with $125 million take records". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on March 23, 2022. Retrieved March 22, 2022.
  49. "All time box office: domestic grosses by MPAA rating". Archived October 22, 2019, at the Wayback Machine Box Office Mojo. Retrieved October 12, 2019.
  50. DeSantis, Nick (February 22, 2016). "'Deadpool' Box Office On Pace To Dethrone 'Passion Of The Christ' As Top-Grossing R-Rated Movie Of All Time". Forbes. Archived from the original on February 25, 2016. Retrieved February 23, 2016.
  51. D'Alessandro, Anthony (February 27, 2016). "Powerless Versus 'Deadpool', 'Gods of Egypt' Is First 2016 Big-Budget Bomb: Saturday AM B.O. Update". Deadline Hollywood. Archived from the original on July 3, 2017. Retrieved February 28, 2016.
  52. McClintock, Pamela (February 28, 2016). "Box Office: 'Deadpool' Entombs Big-Budget Bomb 'Gods of Egypt' to Stay No. 1". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on February 29, 2016. Retrieved February 28, 2016.
  53. McClintock, Pamela (March 6, 2016). "Box Office: 'Zootopia' Defeats 'Deadpool' With Record $73.7M". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on July 13, 2017. Retrieved March 7, 2016.
  54. "The Passion of the Christ (2004): domestic total estimated tickets". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on February 4, 2019. Retrieved May 30, 2016.
  55. "'The Passion of the Christ': "A milestone in the cinema history"". Asia News. PIME Onlus – AsiaNews. April 7, 2004. Archived from the original on October 23, 2021. Retrieved April 2, 2021.
  56. "The Passion Of The Christ Goes International". Worldpress.org. May 2004. Archived from the original on May 9, 2021. Retrieved April 2, 2021. A Philippine student shows a pirated DVD copy of The Passion of the Christ, which opened in local theaters, March 31, 2004.
  57. Flores, Wilson Lee (March 29, 2004). "Mel Gibson's 'Passion' is powerful, disturbing work of art". Philstar.com. Gottingen, Germany: Philstar Global Corp. Archived from the original on April 25, 2023. Retrieved April 2, 2021.
  58. Aravilla, Jose (March 11, 2004). "Bishops endorse Mel Gibson film". Philstar.com. Philstar Global Corp. Archived from the original on April 6, 2023. Retrieved April 2, 2021.
  59. "Censors in Malaysia give OK to 'Passion'". Los Angeles Times. July 10, 2004. Archived from the original on December 24, 2008. Retrieved October 20, 2008.
  60. King, Laura (March 15, 2004). "'Passion' goes unseen in Israel". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on December 24, 2008. Retrieved October 20, 2008.
  61. ^ Blanford, Nicholas (April 9, 2004). "Gibson's movie unlikely box-office hit in Arab world". The Christian Science Monitor. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved March 6, 2006.
  62. "2004 Box Office Totals for Egypt". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on June 8, 2024. Retrieved October 12, 2019.
  63. Dankowitz, Aluma (April 20, 2004). "Reactions in the Arab Media to 'The Passion of the Christ'". Middle East Media Research Institute.
  64. O'Neill, Eddie (February 2, 2014). "'The Passion of the Christ', a Decade Later". National Catholic Register. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved July 31, 2014.
  65. Frater, Patrick (August 8, 2017). "'Wolf Warriors II' Takes All Time China Box Office Record". Variety. Archived from the original on August 8, 2017. Retrieved December 12, 2017.
  66. Robischon, Noah (February 14, 2005). "Less Gore, No Rating for a New 'Passion'". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 8, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  67. ^ "The Passion of the Christ Review". Plugged In. Archived from the original on December 30, 2012.
  68. ^ "The Passion Recut' eases up on the gore". Tampa Bay Times. March 10, 2005. Archived from the original on June 8, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  69. "The Passion Recut". Chicago Reader. March 11, 2005. Archived from the original on September 28, 2022. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  70. Nicole Sperling (March 11, 2005). "'Passion Recut' features less violence". Spartanburg Herald-Journal. Archived from the original on June 8, 2023. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  71. "The Passion Recut: domestic total gross". Archived August 9, 2020, at the Wayback Machine Box Office Mojo. Retrieved October 12, 2019.
  72. "The Passion Of The Christ". BBFC. Archived from the original on August 15, 2021. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  73. ^ Hettrick, Scott (September 1, 2004). "DVD buyers express 'Passion'". Variety. Archived from the original on August 9, 2020. Retrieved June 18, 2019.
  74. Associated Press (September 1, 2004). "Passion DVD sells 4.1 million in one day". Archived February 20, 2022, at the Wayback Machine Today. Retrieved October 13, 2019.
  75. Gibson, Mel. The Passion of the Christ (Blu-ray; visual material) (in Latin and Hebrew) (definitive ed.). Beverly Hills, California: 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment. OCLC 302426419. Archived from the original on June 8, 2024. Retrieved March 29, 2013.
  76. Papamichael, Stella. "The Passion of the Christ: Special Edition DVD". BBC. Archived from the original on September 27, 2013. Retrieved June 5, 2012.
  77. "Mel Gibson's 'The Passion of the Christ' Returns to Blu-ray". High-Def Digest. Archived from the original on February 13, 2017. Retrieved February 12, 2017.
  78. "The Passion of the Christ". TBN. Archived from the original on June 6, 2012. Retrieved June 5, 2012.
  79. "The Passion of the Christ (2004)". Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on July 16, 2008. Retrieved July 16, 2008.
  80. ^ "The Passion of the Christ (2004): reviews". Metacritic. Archived from the original on June 16, 2008. Retrieved July 16, 2008.
  81. McClintock, Pamela (August 19, 2011). "Why CinemaScore Matters for Box Office". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on July 19, 2021. Retrieved July 19, 2021.
  82. White, Armond (March 18, 2008). "Steve McQueen's Hunger". New York Press. Archived from the original on April 23, 2009. Retrieved April 16, 2009.
  83. ^ White, Armond (February 26, 2004). "Africana Reviews: The Passion of the Christ (web archive)". Archived from the original on March 12, 2004.
  84. Ebert, Roger (February 24, 2004). "The Passion of the Christ". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on March 14, 2023. Retrieved August 2, 2006 – via rogerebert.com.
  85. ^ Edelstein, David (February 24, 2004). "Jesus H. Christ". Slate. Archived from the original on November 23, 2009.
  86. Bernard, Jami (February 24, 2004). "The Passion of the Christ". New York Daily News. New York City: Tronc. Archived from the original on April 16, 2004.
  87. "Entertainment Weekly". June 2006. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  88. Sanburn, Josh (September 3, 2010). "Top 10 Ridiculously Violent Movies". Time. New York City. Archived from the original on September 5, 2010. Retrieved January 11, 2019.
  89. "Mel Gibson". IMDb. Archived from the original on March 12, 2018. Retrieved February 1, 2019.
  90. "Hollywood Awards ... and the winners are ..." Hollywood Film Awards. October 19, 2004. Archived from the original on February 2, 2019. Retrieved February 1, 2019.
  91. Золотой Орел 2004 [Golden Eagle 2004] (in Russian). Ruskino.ru. Archived from the original on February 25, 2021. Retrieved March 6, 2017.
  92. "Monica Bellucci, nastro d'argento europeo" [Monica Bellucci, European silver ribbon]. Agenzia Nazionale Stampa Associata (in Italian). May 9, 2017. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved May 29, 2023.
  93. Morgoglione, Claudia (January 22, 2005). "Gianni Amelio contro ..." [Gianni Amelio against Sorrentino in the race for the Nastro d'Argento]. la Repubblica (in Italian). Archived from the original on January 25, 2005. Retrieved May 29, 2023.
  94. Goodacre, Mark (May 2, 2004). "Historical Accuracy of The Passion of the Christ". Archived from the original on October 13, 2008.
  95. Mark Goodacre, "The Power of The Passion: Reacting and Over-reacting to Gibson's Artistic Vision" in "Jesus and Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ. The Film, the Gospels and the Claims of History", ed. Kathleen E. Corley and Robert L. Webb, 2004
  96. Neff, David, and Struck, Jane Johnson (February 23, 2004). "'Dude, that was graphic': Mel Gibson talks about The Passion of The Christ". Christianity Today. Archived from the original on July 9, 2008. Retrieved October 20, 2008.{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  97. Moring, Mark (March 1, 2004). "What's up with the ugly baby?". Christianity Today. Archived from the original on July 9, 2008. Retrieved August 20, 2008.
  98. "Mel Gibson's Passion: on review at the Vatican". Zenit News Agency. December 8, 2003. Archived from the original on September 14, 2012. Retrieved October 17, 2019.
  99. Vivarelli, Nick (December 15, 2003)."Pope peeks at private Passion preview". Archived October 17, 2019, at the Wayback Machine Variety. Retrieved October 17, 2019.
  100. Flynn, J. D. (December 18, 2003). "Pope John Paul endorses The Passion of Christ with five simple words". Catholic News Agency. Retrieved October 17, 2019.
  101. ^ Allen, John L. Jr. (January 9, 2004)."U.S. bishops issue abuse report; more on The Passion ...". Archived June 8, 2024, at the Wayback Machine National Catholic Reporter: The Word from Rome. Retrieved October 20, 2008.
  102. ^ Rich, Frank (January 18, 2014). "The pope's thumbs up for Gibson's Passion" Archived October 18, 2019, at the Wayback Machine. The New York Times Retrieved October 18, 2019.
  103. ^ Wooden, Cindy (January 19, 2004). "Pope never commented on Gibson's 'Passion' film, says papal secretary". Catholic News Service. Archived from the original on January 24, 2004.
  104. Noonan, Peggy (December 17, 2003). "'It is as it was': Mel Gibson's The Passion gets a thumbs-up from the pope". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on March 27, 2010. Retrieved October 20, 2008.
  105. ^ Snyder, Gabriel (January 19, 2004)."Did Pope really plug Passion? Church denies papal support of Gibson's pic". Variety. Archived from the original on December 19, 2008. Retrieved October 18, 2019.
  106. ^ Noonan, Peggy (January 22, 2004). "The story of the Vatican and Mel Gibson's film gets curiouser". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on December 20, 2008. Retrieved October 20, 2008.
  107. ^ Allen, John L. Jr. (January 23, 2004)."Week of prayer for Christian unity; update on The Passion ...". Archived July 5, 2008, at the Wayback Machine National Catholic Reporter: The Word from Rome. Retrieved October 20, 2008.
  108. ^ Dreher, Rod (January 21, 2004)."Did the Vatican endorse Gibson's film – or didn't it?" Dallas Morning News. Archived from the original on January 27, 2012. Retrieved October 19, 2008.
  109. Munoz, Lorenza and Stammer, Larry B. (January 23, 2004)." Fallout over Passion deepens". Archived October 19, 2019, at the Wayback Machine The Los Angeles Times. Contributions by Greg Braxton and the Associated Press. Retrieved October 19, 2019.
  110. "Transcripts: The Passion stirs controversy at the Vatican". Archived February 11, 2009, at the Wayback Machine CNN. Miles O'Brien interview with John L. Allen Jr. on January 21, 2004. Retrieved October 20, 2008.
  111. Pawlikowski, John T. (February 2004). "Christian Anti-Semitism: Past History, Present Challenges Reflections in Light of Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ". Journal of Religion and Film. Archived from the original on August 20, 2006.
  112. "ADL Statement on Mel Gibson's 'The Passion'" (Press release). Anti-Defamation League. June 24, 2003. Archived from the original on July 23, 2008.
  113. Cattan, Nacha (March 5, 2004). "'Passion' Critics Endanger Jews, Angry Rabbis Claim, Attacking Groups, Foxman". The Jewish Daily Forward. Archived from the original on December 4, 2008. Retrieved October 22, 2008.
  114. Pollitt, Katha (March 11, 2004). "The Protocols of Mel Gibson". The Nation. Archived from the original on October 18, 2010. Retrieved August 20, 2008.
  115. Wooden, Cindy (May 2, 2003). "As filming ends, 'Passion' strikes some nerves". National Catholic Reporter. Archived from the original on December 6, 2008. Retrieved August 20, 2008.
  116. Vermes, Geza (February 27, 2004). "Geza Vermes: Christ film will inspire Judeophobia". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 8, 2024. Retrieved January 11, 2022.
  117. Vermes, Geza (February 27, 2003). "Celluloid brutality". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on May 17, 2008. Retrieved August 20, 2008.
  118. "The Jesus War". Archived from the original on December 16, 2008. Retrieved June 9, 2008.
  119. Lawson, Terry (February 17, 2004). "Mel Gibson and Other 'Passion' Filmakers say the Movie was Guided by Faith". Detroit Free Press.
  120. Max Gross (April 9, 2004). "'The Passion of the Christ' Fuels Antisemitism — on 'South Park'". The Jewish Daily Forward. Archived from the original on March 7, 2022. Retrieved March 7, 2022.
  121. Weiner, Allison Hope (July 30, 2006). "Mel Gibson Apologizes for Tirade After Arrest". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 13, 2020. Retrieved June 6, 2020.
  122. "Gibson's Anti-Semitic Tirade Alleged Cover Up". TMZ.com. July 28, 2006. Archived from the original on May 31, 2020. Retrieved June 6, 2020.
  123. Dover, Sara (January 12, 2012). "James Mee: Jewish Cop Who Arrested Mel Gibson Gets Trial in Discrimination Suit". International Business Times. Archived from the original on February 10, 2017. Retrieved November 27, 2016.
  124. Ebert, Roger (March 30, 2004). "Judge ye not Gibson's film until you've actually seen it". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 18, 2021. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
  125. "The Greatest Story Ever Filmed". TownHall.com. August 5, 2003. Archived from the original on June 11, 2011. Retrieved October 22, 2008.
  126. Gaspari, Antonio (September 18, 2003). "The Cardinal & the Passion". National Review Online. Archived from the original on September 19, 2003. Retrieved August 20, 2008.
  127. Corliss, Richard (January 19, 2003). "The Passion of Mel Gibson". Time. Archived from the original on October 26, 2004. Retrieved May 25, 2010.
  128. "Mel Gibson Interview". The Globe and Mail. February 14, 2004.
  129. A. O. Scott (February 25, 2004). "Good and Evil Locked in Violent Showdown". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 13, 2012. Retrieved July 8, 2007.
  130. Gurnow, Michael (April 2008). "The passion of the snuff: how the MPAA allowed a horror film to irreparably scar countless young minds in the name of religion" (PDF). American Atheists. pp. 17–18. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 18, 2015. Retrieved February 17, 2014.
  131. Bond, Paul (June 9, 2016). "Mel Gibson Planning 'Passion of the Christ' Sequel (Exclusive)". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on July 7, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2023.
  132. Burger, John (September 25, 2020). "Jim Caviezel to play Jesus again in sequel to 'The Passion of Christ'". Aleteia. Aleteia SAS. Archived from the original on October 31, 2021. Retrieved October 7, 2020.
  133. Guno, Nina V. (September 24, 2020). "'Passion of the Christ 2' is coming, says Jim Caviezel". Inquirer Entertainment. INQUIRER.net. Archived from the original on October 31, 2021. Retrieved October 7, 2020.
  134. Morris, Andrea (September 14, 2020). "'Resurrection': Actor Jim Caviezel Reveals Third Draft for 'Passion of The Christ' Sequel". Christian Broadcast Network. Archived from the original on March 19, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2023.
  135. Dela Paz, Maggie (July 4, 2023). "The Passion of the Christ 2 Is 'Like an Acid Trip,' Says Mel Gibson". ComingSoon. Archived from the original on July 6, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2023.
  136. Vivarelli, Nick (September 19, 2024). "Mel Gibson Is Scouting Locations in Europe for 'The Passion of the Christ' Sequel". Variety. Retrieved September 19, 2024.

External links

Mel Gibson
Films directed
Films written
Produced only
Characters
Related articles
Categories: