Misplaced Pages

Talk:Golan Heights: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:57, 3 December 2011 editWGFinley (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,088 edits →Reverts Must Be Discussed: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 06:01, 5 January 2025 edit undoEditVerifier (talk | contribs)21 edits →Edit request: new sectionTag: New topic 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader|search=yes}} {{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{Arab-Israeli Arbitration Enforcement}} {{Arab-Israeli Arbitration Enforcement}}
{{Calm}}
{{sanctions|All editors of this article '''are required''' to ] '''any''' ] on the article talk page and are subject to remedies as outlined above if they fail to do so.}}
{{On this day|date1=2017-12-14|oldid1=815426750|date2=2021-12-14|oldid2=1060066201|date3=2022-12-14|oldid3=1123868011}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Israel|class=B|importance=high}} {{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Syria |class=B |importance=High}} {{WikiProject Israel|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Volcanoes|class=start|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Syria|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Western Asia|class=B|importance=high}} {{WikiProject Volcanoes|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Western Asia|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Geography|importance=low}}
}} }}
{{calmtalk}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=/Archive index |target=/Archive index
Line 14: Line 15:
|leading_zeros=0 |leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes}} |indexhere=yes}}
{{Auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot I|age=14|small=no|dounreplied=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 200K |maxarchivesize = 200K
|counter = 14 |counter = 16
|minthreadsleft = 4 |minthreadsleft = 4
|algo = old(14d) |algo = old(14d)
Line 24: Line 24:
}} }}


== Proportion occupied by Israel ==
== Syrian Heights and ] ==


The article says 2/3 occupied by Israel. The accompanying map, with its thin line just east of the occupied area, seems to show a tiny strip remaining under Syrian control and around 90% occupied. Either the map is misleading, or it is wrong, or (I suppose less likely) the 2/3 is wrong. I hope someone can fix the map. ] (]) 04:38, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
The following phrase has been inserted into the Lead, ''“also referred to as Syrian Golan or the Syrian Heights.”'' The reference for the POV edit is one 30-year old source. Per ], it doesn’t hold up. One ref to a 30-year old source is insufficient to establish a commonly used name. Moreover, I have found the following sources that refer to it as the Israeli Golan;


:I was just going to post about this since we see this, "Following the 2024 Syrian opposition offensives Israel occupied the remaining one third of the area." The map needs updating to reflect the full locations with Israelis present. ] (]) 19:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)


== Lede too long ==
If one can refer to the Golan as “Syrian Golan” on reliance on one 30-year old source, surely one can easily call it the "Israeli Golan Heights" based on a multiplicity of much more recent sources that refer to it by that name.--] (]) 02:13, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


Lede is a summary of the body and should be ideally four well-composed paragraphs. The recent additions, especially to the last lede paragraph, has turned it into a bloated live blog instead of an encyclopaedic entry. ] (]) 16:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
:"Syrian Heights" was common before 1967 and doesn't need to be in the lead. "Syrian Golan" is the standard name used by the UN and other international bodies and must remain (with a more recent source). "Israeli Golan" is not a name at all but a description. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 06:00, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
::I agree that "Syrian Golan" must remain. The ] frequently refers to the region as "Syrian Golan" and there are many other reputable sources that use that name. This is an encyclopedia article, not a soapbox.] (]) 12:28, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
:::"Syrian Golan" isn't a name in the same sense that "Syrian Heights" or "Golan Heights" are names. "Egyptian Sinai" and "Israeli Dead Sea" similarly aren't names but rather nationally designated territories or sites. Is there a source establishing that the Golan Heights are also referred to as the "Syrian Golan"?—] (]) 13:12, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
::::Many of the articles references address that, but the one that I linked to above is especially clear. ] (]) 15:00, 1 December 2011 (UTC)


:Agreed. I've edited the last paragraph already. Can we summarise some of the history? ] (]) 15:10, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
== Map Problems ==
::I've taken a stab at the history too. See what you think? ] (]) 15:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
:::Better now, the second lede paragraph still needs trimming, specifically avoiding the hyperfocus on ancient civilizations. ] (]) 08:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
::::Agreed. Any better now? We could remove the ] too, if you'd prefer. ] (]) 10:03, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
:::::Much better, thanks. Very pleasantly readable now. ] (]) 10:10, 28 December 2024 (UTC)


== Edit request ==
There are currently three maps used in the article which is way too many. This one is not neutral as it shows the Golan as part of Syria. The Golan Heights have been under Israeli civilian control for 44.5 years. They have been under Syrian control for only 21. I have compiled a number of maps from reliable sources (including ] and ]) showing the Golan as belonging to neither Israel nor Syria. Please note the UPI map. The Golan remains under defacto Israeli control and it’s disputed status should be reflected on corresponding maps.--] (]) 02:17, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
:I agree. Maps that don't indicate Israeli control of the area are a disservice to our readers.--'']] ]'' 02:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
:: However the one JJG indicated ''does'' show Israeli control. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 06:02, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
::Exactly, it actually specifically says that Israel controls the territory, with that control having a name. This attempt to whitewash the near consensus among competent parties on the Golan's status is more than silly, it is disruptive as it attempts to distort facts backed by countless scholarly sources to allow for a fringe narrative that the Golan is not Syrian territory held by Israel under military occupation. That is the position of nearly the entire world, and the sources in the article back that up. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 15:38, 13 November 2011 (UTC)</small>


I think it would be more accurate to say “eastern '''third'''” instead of “eastern half” in the following sentence: {{blockquote|From 2012 to 2018, the eastern '''half''' of the Golan Heights became a scene of repeated battles…}} ] (]) 06:01, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
== Improve Readability of the Lede ==

I think that the lede is currently way too wordy and dense with information. Let's work on improving the summary so it's readable and easy to understand. ] (]) 13:24, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
:I see nothing basically wrong with it. It would be best to set forth your proposals here for general consideration.] (]) 08:38, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
::I've improved it considerably since my last comment. The lede is pretty good now, in my opinion. ] (]) 06:39, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

== Purple Line, disambiguation ==

Small fix, but could someone make it so "Purple Line" doesn't link to the disambiguation page? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:29, 30 November 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Done, thanks for bringing that up. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 17:35, 30 November 2011 (UTC)</small>
==File:Golan evacuation.jpg Nominated for Deletion==
{|
|-
| ]
| An image used in this article, ], has been nominated for deletion at ] in the following category: ''Deletion requests November 2011''
;What should I do?
''Don't panic''; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is ] then you may need to upload it to Misplaced Pages (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no ] then it cannot be uploaded or used.

''This notification is provided by a Bot'' --] (]) 10:30, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
|}
:I'm going to vote *Delete*, but in the meantime I think it should be taken out of this article. No one has any clue where the image came from. ] (]) 15:58, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

== Revert Edit by Biosketch ==

I just reverted this edit -- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Golan_Heights&oldid=463492771 -- by Biosketch in which he or she reverted an edit from a day earlier. In the earlier edit, I replaced a Subdivision Infobox section that had the word "Status" as "subdivision type" and a paragraph of text as "subdivision name" with "Country" as the subdivision type and "Syria (occupied by Israel)" as the name. Also, Biosketch did not bring his or her revert to attention on this talk page, as required by http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Palestine-Israel_articles#Discretionary_sanctions. ] (]) 15:33, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
:This has already been discussed. Months ago it was pointed out that while the international community considers the Golan Heights ''Syrian territory occupied by Israel'', sources disagree as to whether it is in Israel, in Syria, in neither, or in both. None of the sources cited for the claim that the Golan Heights are located in Syria actually says what you're claiming they say. The version I reverted to corresponds to the language used by the reliable sources cited in this article. Your version, on the other hand, pushes a POV not supported by any of the sources.—] (]) 15:51, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
::I agree with the facts in the long text, but I don't think that a 16-word entry for "Country" is a sufficient summary. From ], the purpose of an Infobox is "to summarize key facts about the article in which it appears." I'm open to other condensed wording, as long as it's still factually correct. Many of the references support the current wording. For example, reference #2, is the CIA World Factbook article on Syria and it states, "there are 41 Israeli settlements and civilian land use sites in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights." The current infobox wording is "Syria (occupied by Israel)". ] (]) 02:46, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
:::"Many of the references support the current wording." No they do not. They support the earlier consensus-based NPOV wording describing the Golan Heights as Syrian territory occupied by Israel. The CIA source, moreover, is only representative of the perspective of the CIA, or maximally the U.S. It doesn't merit greater weight in the infobox than the other sources cited in the article. Regarding the "16-word entry" concern, the geographic location of the Golan Heights is controversial; an exceptionally long description of the Golan's geographic location is justified by the exceptional circumstances involved with the territory in practice.—] (]) 22:48, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
::::'"Many of the references support the current wording." No they do not.' -- Based on that quote, I do not think you can be reasoned with. ] (]) 05:50, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
:::::Just a heads up that Biosketch made to this section before consensus was reached here and without mentioning the new edit here on this talk page. ] (]) 07:35, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
::::::The consensus was already reached and you acted against it please ].--] (]) 10:31, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

==File:Israeli troops at Golan front 1973.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion==
{|
|-
| ]
| An image used in this article, ], has been nominated for speedy deletion at ] for the following reason: ''Other speedy deletions''
;What should I do?
''Don't panic''; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Misplaced Pages. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is ] then you may need to upload it to Misplaced Pages (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no ] then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try ]

''This notification is provided by a Bot'' --] (]) 11:14, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
|}
:*I've tagged ] for speedy deletion with this reasoning: "No license given in source. The source doesn't say anything about the origin of the photo. The author is unknown. The country where it was taken is unknown, so the copyright is unknown. Clear speedy delete." ] (]) 12:27, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
:*I've adjusted the speedy delete to a copyright violation speedy delete since I tracked the photo's origin down. It's a Corbis Rights Managed photo -- http://www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/rights-managed/BE021814/israeli-tank-firing-from-the-golan-heights. I'm going to remove the photo from the article. That makes two recent copyright violation image removals from this article -- we need to find replacements. ] (]) 17:45, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

== Israel/JNF owns Golan Heights land (both in Israeli controlled area and Syrian area) ==

Someone should add information about this as it is missing from the article and very relevant.
http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/docview.asp?did=381343 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:25, 3 December 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Reverts Must Be Discussed ==

In August 2010 I put a sanction in place on this article related to reverts which required that all reverts be explained on the talk page. I also put a warning at the top of this page as well as an edit notice . Golan Heights is a disputed region and disputes in this topic naturally arise and tempers flare.

At the time there wasn't a 1RR restriction on Palestine-Israel Conflict articles, that was done in November 2010. When that new restriction was put in place and the new warning template created someone replaced the template without preserving my sanction for this article from the top of the talk page '''but not''' from the edit warning.

The sanction is still in place and, given the history of this article, still clearly needed. Therefore I have put the notice back on the talk page and advise all editors here now that '''all reverts on this page need to be explained'''. Yes, even for vandalism (given the way the term is abused in this topic area). No action will be taken against anyone who reverted without discussion before now given the removal of my notice on the talk page. --] (]) 17:57, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:01, 5 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Golan Heights article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16Auto-archiving period: 14 days 
Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

  • You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
  • You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
  1. Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
  2. Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

  • Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
  • Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
Peace dove with olive branch in its beakPlease stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on December 14, 2017, December 14, 2021, and December 14, 2022.
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconIsrael High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Project Israel To Do:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconSyria High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconVolcanoes Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWestern Asia High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGeography Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Geography To-do list:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Proportion occupied by Israel

The article says 2/3 occupied by Israel. The accompanying map, with its thin line just east of the occupied area, seems to show a tiny strip remaining under Syrian control and around 90% occupied. Either the map is misleading, or it is wrong, or (I suppose less likely) the 2/3 is wrong. I hope someone can fix the map. Zaslav (talk) 04:38, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

I was just going to post about this since we see this, "Following the 2024 Syrian opposition offensives Israel occupied the remaining one third of the area." The map needs updating to reflect the full locations with Israelis present. Iljhgtn (talk) 19:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Lede too long

Lede is a summary of the body and should be ideally four well-composed paragraphs. The recent additions, especially to the last lede paragraph, has turned it into a bloated live blog instead of an encyclopaedic entry. Makeandtoss (talk) 16:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Agreed. I've edited the last paragraph already. Can we summarise some of the history? Lewisguile (talk) 15:10, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
I've taken a stab at the history too. See what you think? Lewisguile (talk) 15:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Better now, the second lede paragraph still needs trimming, specifically avoiding the hyperfocus on ancient civilizations. Makeandtoss (talk) 08:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Agreed. Any better now? We could remove the WP:SEAOFBLUE too, if you'd prefer. Lewisguile (talk) 10:03, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Much better, thanks. Very pleasantly readable now. Makeandtoss (talk) 10:10, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Edit request

I think it would be more accurate to say “eastern third” instead of “eastern half” in the following sentence:

From 2012 to 2018, the eastern half of the Golan Heights became a scene of repeated battles…

EditVerifier (talk) 06:01, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Categories: