Revision as of 16:57, 9 December 2011 editGraemeL (talk | contribs)35,298 edits →hey there: reply.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:04, 4 March 2024 edit undoPrimeBOT (talk | contribs)Bots2,066,057 editsm →ArbCom 2019 special circular: Task 24: button update following a TFDTag: AWB | ||
(331 intermediate revisions by 94 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|3=1 September 2021}} | |||
{{administrator}} | {{administrator}} | ||
{{tinc|top=0.5}} | <!--{{tinc|top=0.5}}--> | ||
<span class="plainlinks" style="float: right;"></small></span> | |||
<!--<big>{{center|''']'''}}</big>--> | |||
<span class="plainlinks" style="float: right;"> | |||
</small> | |||
</span> | |||
<div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px black; background-color: firebrick; color:yellow"> | <div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px black; background-color: firebrick; color:yellow"> | ||
'''This is GraemeL's ], where you can send messages and comments to him.''' | |||
*'''I will reply here unless you ask me to reply somewhere else.''' | *'''I will reply here unless you ask me to reply somewhere else.''' | ||
*'''If I posted something (other than a warning) to your talk page, I probably added it to my watch list. I would prefer replies in the same page as the original post. However, feel free to reply here if you want.''' | *'''If I posted something (other than a warning) to your talk page, I probably added it to my watch list. I would prefer replies in the same page as the original post. However, feel free to reply here if you want.''' | ||
Line 10: | Line 16: | ||
] | ] | ||
<big> | <big> | ||
<span class="plainlinks"> | |||
</span> | |||
</big> | </big> | ||
] | ] | ||
Line 34: | Line 42: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
</span> | </span> | ||
<!--End archives--> | <!--End archives--> | ||
Line 40: | Line 51: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
== ArbCom 2017 election voter message == | |||
== CARNet page == | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, GraemeL. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
Dear Sir, | |||
I am writing to inform you that I am an employee of Croatian Academic and Research Network - CARNet. | |||
I am employed as a member of the Editorial board of official CARNet’s website. | |||
CARNet Executive Committee has given me the task to update the CARNet site on Misplaced Pages in Croatian language and English language. | |||
So, I have adapted texts from the official CARNet’s website for Misplaced Pages in Croatian. Texts are now published on the CARNet page on Misplaced Pages in Croatian. | |||
We translated the same adapted texts for Misplaced Pages to English language. I put these adapted texts on CARNet’s page on Misplaced Pages in English language yesterday. Therefore texts are not copied from the web, they are adapted for Misplaced Pages. | |||
Could you please inform me what is the procedure for getting permit for publication of these contents? | |||
Would it be enough if we sent you a license for publishing content and photos signed by the CEO or we have to follow some special procedures? | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
Thank you in advance. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
Sincerely, | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/04&oldid=813406758 --> | |||
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
Ljerka Culina | |||
lculina@CARNethr | |||
] (]) 10:31, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, GraemeL. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
== Medisweans == | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
Thanks for deleting this. This was the second time its been deleted to day, and it keeps coming back every two or three months. Did you think to salt it? It looks like the pattern of work of a professional spammer. --] (]) 15:07, 11 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
: I didn't salt it because the two times today were the only occasions that ''this particular'' article has been crated by the user. I did watchlist it though. I seriously considered blocking him indefinitely, but ended up with just a 24 hour block. If he comes back and spams again, an indef block will be in order. --] ] 15:11, 11 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=866998124 --> | |||
== Report == | |||
where can I make a note urget? | |||
== ArbCom 2019 special circular == | |||
Thanks <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
<div class="notice" style="background:#fff1d2; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height:40px; line-height:130.7%; font-weight: 130.7%;"> | |||
:You probably mean 'urgent', but then again, your English is much better than my Italian. English Misplaced Pages is not really the place to air problems that you have with another language project. The admins here have no authority on other projects. Following the dispute resolution process on your own project would be the best procedure. --] ] 18:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
{| | |||
|valign="top" style="padding: 0.5em 1em 0 0.25em;"| ] | |||
|<span style="font-size: 125%;">'''Administrators ] secure their accounts'''</span> | |||
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. | |||
* Use strong, unique passwords for your Misplaced Pages account and associated email | |||
* ] if your Misplaced Pages account password or email password is reused on another website, , or weak | |||
* ] for improved security | |||
|} | |||
<span style="color:#5871C6;cursor:pointer" class="mw-customtoggle-ArbCom_2019_special_circular">{{clickable button 2|1=View additional information|link=no}}</span> | |||
</div><div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-ArbCom_2019_special_circular" style="display:none"> | |||
<div style="border-style: dotted; border-color: #886644; border-width: 0 3px 3px 3px; padding: 0 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em;"> | |||
{| style="border-left: 3px solid black; padding-left: 1em;" | |||
Yes, but unfortunately on wikipedia.it, this does not happen, there is a very heavy electronic dictatorship. | |||
|{{null}} | |||
Some admin does not allow the debate and do not follow the guidelines of wikipedia, just to get a short pause. | |||
; Why have I received this message? | |||
To whom it may report these cases of abuse? | |||
: All administrators are receiving it. | |||
--] (]) 18:19, 11 December 2010 (UTC)FindingMladic | |||
:The only place I can think of that might be of help would be searching at ]. That's the over-arching project. --] ] 18:35, 11 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Thanks for the suggestion, one last question, how did you know that I'm Italian?:-) | |||
--] (]) 22:03, 11 December 2010 (UTC)Searchingcriminal | |||
::Just presumed you spoke it since you were having problems with admins on the Italian languge wiki ;) --] ] 22:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
ok;-)--] (]) 22:10, 11 December 2010 (UTC)Searchingcriminals | |||
:Sorry for intruding, but unfortunately the English Misplaced Pages is unable to intervene with disputes on other projects. The best way to resolve your issue, since it involves an administrator, is to either contact a ] on it.wiki, or a Steward on ]. ] 06:41, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
; What prompted you to send this message? | |||
Each intervention is welcome, unfortunately, the gentlemen in question: Demart81 and Vituzzu have great power and have many friends among the admin. | |||
: Recently, several Misplaced Pages admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were ]. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh ] after losing control of their account. | |||
It was elected as an admin a psychopath called Demart81 who loves to persecute people who are not nice. | |||
Some time ago, attacked several people with bad words and thanks to the intercession of Vituzzu returned to the site and makes all the moralist. | |||
He caused a lot of controversy with many users and has the support of Vituzzu, these people operate as if the wikipedia site had them. | |||
They do not listen to the versions of the accused and threatened to expel those who transgress their laws. | |||
Some people agree with me but are afraid af deal freely, they fear the block. | |||
You could not report these cases of abuse occurring at the headquarters of the project wikipedia.it wikipedia? | |||
; What do I need to do? | |||
Thanks for the help | |||
: Only to follow the instructions in this message. | |||
--] (]) 04:54, 13 December 2010 (UTC)Searchingcriminals | |||
:# Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). | |||
:# Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). | |||
:# Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. | |||
; How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? | |||
== Censorship == | |||
: You can find out more about 2FA at ]. | |||
The censorship on this site is ironic, to say the least. You seem to want everyone to contribute, with the caveat that it must be things that you personally approve of. This site is as hypocritical as Wikileaks, who believes that nothing should be secret except for their operation. What a farce, and one of the reasons that Misplaced Pages is considered as a joke of an information source. YOU decide what is "neutral", which from many points of view is quite biased. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 23:25, 11 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
|}</div> | |||
:Because ''Hopefully, upon near-certain conviction, he will be executed for treason.'' belongs in an encyclopaedia article? I think not. --] ] 23:29, 11 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
== Regarding Internet Suraksha == | |||
Sir, | |||
I have not used any copyrighted information, and the article whose content I have used in the page has been written by me itself for the Times Of india supplement Ahmedabad Mirror. So I dont think there is any harm in posting my own article again. And that I have created this page for advertisement purposes is not true. This is a non-profit organisation and I have written about my research which aims to create awareness amongst people. I hope that my article will be a part of Misplaced Pages again. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:Sorry, but the article is a word-for-word copy of a newspaper article which claims "''Copyright © Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved.''". Unless you can prove that you own the copyright and not the paper, we cannot expose the project to potential legal claims. Please have somebody from the paper go through the procedure outlined at ] if they wish to donate the material for use under the license used by the project. --] ] 10:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Sir, | |||
I have now edited some portions of my article. Please review it. If you still believe that I rewrite it totally its fine with me. As I had written the article for the newspaper myself, as the mention it on the article itself " The writer is a class XII student of Swastik School and has been trained in cybersecurity at Techdefence Consulting Pvt Ltd." But as you have said sir, I have edited some portions and I suggest you may edit some parts if you wish to. But I really hope that people realise how dreadful SMS forging is as there isnt any article on Misplaced Pages regarding this as a part of hacking and that it was a research of Internet Suraksha I hope it is included in it. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:48, 12 December 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:Replied on user's talk page. --] ] 16:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Street Art == | |||
Hi, I am new to wikipedia, so I just noticed it wasn't such a good idea to include all these websites in my edit. I still think your page was lacking reference on Invader who is really one of the most important figures of street art all over the world, and given the size of its influence in Paris, it was important to mention the city then. I will try to find more reliable sources today. | |||
] (]) 15:52, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Yes, the Invader part is probably worth including as he has an article here which establishes his notability. I don't have a problem if you add the mention of Invader back (you don't need to reference that, just add a wikilink to his article). You can add the others in, if you can find news sources to use as references, but please don't add the links to their sites back in. --] ] 15:58, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Moors == | |||
Hello GraemeL, | |||
I am writing you about the ] page, these "two" closely related people ] and ] have been vandalising the page (and others for months now) making race based edit removing information about Black Africans from the page information that is sourced in the article. You protected the page shortly after this vandalism occured. They is no reason why that information should be taken out of the article. Please restore it. Thank you ] (]) 18:37, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:It is actually a contractual requirement that the admin protect ]. | |||
:Get a consensus on the talk page and post {{tlx|editprotected}}. I'm not taking sides in an edit war. If you get me involved, I'm liable to start by blocking '''all''' of the edit warring parties. --] ] 18:53, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
I see how me asking you to restore it to the orignal is sort of like asking you to take a side. That was not my intention and I'm definately not asking you to get involved in an edit war, I think edit wars are down right foolish. I'm just frustrated with this because its not just about the moors page. There are several pages they do this on. Again this issue have been going on for months, If you check the history of the discuss page you can see that "this topic" was dealt with. I have asked the user several times why he makes his edit and have never gotten a response. I wrote to you because as administrators you intercede and help with situations like this. I honestly don't know how to deal with someone who doesn't try to comunicate the purpose of their edits and doesn't seem to be care about warnings or the blocks they get and just continue to vandalize pages. Anyway if you do not want to get involve, I respect it ] (]) 20:28, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Posting an ] might help, if you haven't tried that already. That could get a wider consensus forming group together to hopefully break the deadlock that exists at the moment. After that, there would be a clearer picture of which version was considered best. --] ] 20:34, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Thanks == | |||
Thanks for the wikilinks on my user page. They do look better. ] (]) 20:30, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Cool. I hate the arrow thingies. --] ] 20:35, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Advice re Delicious carbuncle == | |||
Regarding your comment , the user is attempting to deflect an earlier ANI report about the user's BLP violations, to change the issue to be an attack on me. {{user|Delicious carbuncle}} has engaged in abuse of process, and forum-shopping, disrupting multiple pages to push his attack on me across many different pages: ANI, NPOVN, WT:SCN, BLPN, etc. This disruption by {{user|Delicious carbuncle}} is ongoing on a topic under sanctions of probation (]) and other remedies (]) What can be done about this disruptive behavior pattern? Thank you for your time, -- ''']''' (]) 21:51, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Well, if he posts again to ] without trying to either edit the article or raise the issue on the article talk page first, I will block him. He's tying up too many people for things that almost certainly wouldn't be controversial if he just did the edit with an appropriate summary, or asked on the article talk pages. --] ] 21:57, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
::Even more forum-shopping . The pages {{user|Delicious carbuncle}} will disrupt in order to violate ] (history of that already, see his block log) is seemingly endless. Despite my repeated attempts to address the issue, ''and'' to point out that the user escalates issues '''''before''''' even '''''attempting''''' to address them at the articles' talk pages, the user continues the ongoing disruptive behavior. He has already been warned, and he has already been given notice of the existing remedies from ]. What can be done about this? -- ''']''' (]) 21:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::Given the on-going posts there, I beg you to follow through... ] (]) 22:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Please see the , which in light of the user's response to my report about his BLP violations at ANI, seems to me basically to be motivated by ]. Thoughts? -- ''']''' (]) 23:39, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Yeah, I have Jimbo on my watchlist. I was giving him a pass on that because it was possible that he posted the question there before he had seen my warning to him. Hopefully, he won't show up elsewhere on my watchlist that isn't an article, or article talk page. --] ] 23:43, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
::He is still engaging in the ] issue at Jimbo's talk page and at ]. He has not rescinded, redacted, or refactored any of his attacks against me - either 1) at ANI or 2) at BLPN. He has not acknowledged that his edits to article page ] were BLP violations. He has not stated he will change his behavior re-adding ''disputed'' sources to BLP pages in the future. Thoughts? -- ''']''' (]) 23:49, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
'''Update:''' Disruption still continues after your warning, see . Can something be done about this? -- ''']''' (]) 03:38, 13 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Please see , and , and . Can action be taken with regards to this user? Thank you, -- ''']''' (]) 03:43, 13 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Request declined == | |||
Hi there, you declined my request for the article ] to be semi-protected. I think it should be up for semi-protection. Have you checked through the older history? Many IP users have been adding unsourced information. ] (]) 22:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Older history is not important. Protection is only used to deal with current problems, not previous or future problems. If you want to nominate it again, I'll let another admin deal with the request, but I honestly don't feel that it needs protection at the moment. --] ] 23:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Ok thanks for the notice. That I did not know. I guess I should've requested it ages ago. ] (]) 23:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Now at AE == | |||
Regarding above involving {{user|Delicious carbuncle}}, now at AE, please see ]. Thank you for your time, -- ''']''' (]) 04:24, 13 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks. I had logged out for the night shortly after my last comment in the thread above, so I didn't see your additions until a short while ago. I've commented on the enforcement request. --] ] 11:17, 13 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Slots == | |||
GraemeL, I got carried away by seeing the slots hero site adding 6 references (have not checked if there are more) for which I have strong doubt this is allowed. I have a well written article about several if it is useful for a reference on Misplaced Pages. | |||
--] (]) 22:32, 13 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:I'm not convinced that it would pass muster as a ] for use as a reference. In any case, hunting around articles for suitable text to add your site as a reference to isn't the way to go about things. Expanding articles where they are in need of more detail and adding references to that text may be the way for you to go, but keep in mind that you have an obvious ] if you include your own site as a reference for anything you add. --] ] 22:40, 13 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
The articles are written by research and all are 100% unique. I see what you mean and I totally understand your point of view regarding Misplaced Pages's guidelines for RS and COI. There would be no problem for me adding more general content to a specific Misplaced Pages slot page which is in need to be more informative but as you mentioned before my site will most likely have a COI in case I use an article as a reference just like the slotshero site has done with too many in my opinion, but I am not to judge here just seeing like it is. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:29, 13 December 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Administrator intervention against vandalism == | |||
Hello, GraemeL. In I have expressed a different view than you, and I thought you might be interested in seeing it. If you have any comment to make about what I wrote, positive negative or neutral, I shall read it with interest. If, on the other hand, you have nothing to say, fine. (I admit that in this case it is an academic point, as there is another reason why I agree with you on not taking any action, but it might make a difference another time.) ] (]) 21:38, 14 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:I saw it and was about to post to your talk page when you landed here first. You're right in your interpretation, I should have done more than just blow it off as stale, it is a slow edit war. --] ] 21:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Eczema revision == | |||
Dear GraemeL, Please could you let me know why you have deleted my edit to the eczema page? thank you, ] (]) 21:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Jenny Stalker. | |||
:My reason was in my edit summary "''rv spammy addition''". was posted to a medical article with no sources, never mind ] along with multiple links to commercial companies selling the alleged treatment. It was unacceptable for both being unsourced and advertising individual companies. I'll post some links to your talk page so you can read a few policies, if you reference your addition and don't talk about individual companies treatments, it may be a good addition to the article. --] ] 21:46, 14 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
I'm sorry, I just noticed that I inadvertently stepped on your toes there; I didn't know you'd done any revision deletions when I declined the revdel request, and didn't mean to take over. Feel free to do whatever you think best, I ''think'' I did the right thing but this is ''not'' my area of expertise. --] (]) 22:33, 14 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:It's no problem, I actually started and then backed out when I realized that there were over 50 revisions with the copyvio and suppressing them would involve hiding a lot of useful edits. I left it for somebody with more knowledge of the appropriate policies to deal with. Your response in your edit summary when you removed the template seems a reasonable one. --] ] 22:47, 14 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Online Gambling == | |||
Links were perfect as a substitute for missing links. Gambling Info is a free gambling collection of info, similar to wikipedia but targeted. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:07, December 15, 2010</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
:When you show up and replace 4 (admittedly broken) references with four references to the same site it looks like you're pushing the site in question. | |||
:When you revert back to your version with a misleading edit summary claiming to be reverting vandalism, you start to look like an out and out spammer. | |||
:Please take it to the article talk page if you think the site is a ] to use in references. --] ] 00:15, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Business card == | |||
<small>This message was sent to all administrators following a ]. Thank you for your attention. For the ], ] 02:28, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small> | |||
Hey GraemeL, | |||
<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular --> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 --> | |||
<!-- --> | |||
== Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular) == | |||
I see you revised the business card of the Custom Die Cut card on the page. The reason I posted it on Wiki is because there were 3 of the same types of cards. Where now days in 2010 there are many forms of business cards and even like the one I posted a Die Cut card. If you like I can remove myself from the account and get the design team to post it like what Pure sounds in Darwin did :) | |||
The die cut card is very original and Wiki worthy :D | |||
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community. | |||
P.s I know its not related to wikipedia at all but assange is on bail! :D happy days :) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 10:56, 15 December 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are ] to "have strong passwords and ]." We have ] our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, ] remains an ''optional'' means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised. | |||
:Though a die cut card image may be a worthy of an addition to the article, the image that you're adding appears to be for your own business. You clearly have a ] and should take the question of whether it should be included to the article's talk page and only add it back if there is a clear consensus for inclusion. --] ] 12:17, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Feng Shui== | |||
The sentence and the link you deleted is not spam.] (]) 18:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:It was a foreign language link. Those should only be used in cases where no English site is available and there are lots of Feng shui reference sites in English. If you think the link is the only valid source, then please get a consensus for using it on the talk page of the article. --] ] 18:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered. | |||
== fyi == | |||
For the Arbitration Committee, -] 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small> | |||
Just letting you know that I changed the heading level of your comment at AE, , if I misjudged your intention please revert. <i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">]]]</i> 22:09, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular correction --> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 --> | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
:Yeah, it hit the top of my watchlist just as I refreshed it. You did the right thing. Thanks for the notification --] ] 22:11, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
== nuh uh == | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
it is too a how to guide. prove that it isnt.... | |||
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> | |||
] (]) 15:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC)GOD | |||
:I already provided you with links to the policy on your talk page, please read them. --] ] 15:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
== i can respect that a commercial reference should not be included == | |||
== Administrators will no longer be ] == | |||
- however I do not believe that its right to delete the other info which have as much basis in fact as the other page info] (]) 00:00, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Everything past the first paragraph was blatant advertising of a commercial product. The first paragraph was unsourced. The whole thing has no place in the article, unless you can find a ] to back up the first paragraph, then that paragraph could be included. --] ] 00:04, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
A ] Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove ] from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with ], choose to ] this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the ]. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Fertility Lubricants == | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=1058184441 --> | |||
== How we will see unregistered users == | |||
Hello, not sure why the addition of fertility lubricants is not acceptable. The reference provided gives full details of the clinical poster published the ], unlike others on the page including the "Organic" which is purely commercial and refs their own PR. --] (]) 00:18, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
<section begin=content/> | |||
:I would tend to agree with Alex on this one. It doesn't seem to be a soapbox, nor a self promotion. Just my two cents. --] <sup>]</sup> 00:24, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Hi! | |||
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki. | |||
== hey == | |||
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed. | |||
i will send 50 dollars on thursday <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:While you're at it, I'll happily take $50.<span style="white-space:nowrap">--<font color="green">]</font><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></span> 00:39, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin '''will still be able to access the IP'''. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on ] to help. | |||
== Re-start ] talkpage? == | |||
If you have not seen it before, you can ]. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can ] to ]. | |||
Hi GraemeL! You ] ], 15:41, 11 December 2010. Your fellow ] ] has also been working on the now re-started article. Should the talkpage possibly now also be re-started? xxx --] (]) 15:11, 20 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
We have ] this identity could work. '''We would appreciate your feedback''' on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can ]. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January. | |||
why don´t you like any of these companies? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:20, 20 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Thank you. | |||
== Pending changes on ] == | |||
/]<section end=content/> | |||
18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
Hello, | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=User:Johan_(WMF)/Target_lists/Admins2022(3)&oldid=22532499 --> | |||
You added pending changes to System of a down at my request nearly a month ago. I just wanted to report that it is working excellently, and that despite it being a somewhat ignored article before hand, pending changes are accepted/rejected often before I even get a chance to check because of how watched it is now. | |||
== New administrator activity requirement == | |||
If there's any way to keep it going indefinitely, that would be really great; its curbed all vandalism without inhibiting IP contributions. Cheers, ''']''' <sup>]</sup> <sub>]</sub> 23:35, 11 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
{{ivmbox|The administrator policy has been updated with new ] following a successful ]. | |||
== Removal of internet radio stuff from Drum & Bass == | |||
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have: | |||
You removed an important topic from the Drum & Bass section.. When I rewrote that piece I added information about various influencial radio stations that exist for this genre, and now that whole section was removed. There are other sections in on this page which refer to artists websites and such.. I removed the links to all the radio sites I mentioned. Hopefully this is sufficient. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:37, 15 March 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
#Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR | |||
#Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period | |||
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work. | |||
== Account-Question == | |||
}} | |||
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=All_administrators&oldid=1082922312 --> | |||
{{You've got mail}} ] (]) 01:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
hello, can you help me, please? it is better for me, to become the same username as in my home-wiki in germany, so i can unite the different accounts under one name. i have seen and searched, the user ''TRS'' here is not active?!? or perhaps, you have the possability to unite (merge? unify? ;) ) my accounts? thx and greetings – ] (]) 13:52, 29 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
{{-}} | |||
== Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
== Article was deleted. == | |||
My article got speedy deleted. I'd like a copy of the article so I can edit it, make it satisfactory under all wikipedia's guidelines. Thank you very much. ] (]) 02:41, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
== Reasons To Delete J1c3d (Y-DNA), ie, brain dump. == | |||
Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. | |||
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
# Articles ], including ], ], and articles that are themselves ] (but not articles describing notable hoaxes) | |||
#Articles for which thorough attempts to find ] to ] them have failed | |||
#Categories representing ] | |||
] (]) 02:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)<br /> | |||
The hold on editing has been taken off without explanation, to my knowledge, as of this moment, without justification. <br /> | |||
] (]) 00:42, 3 August 2011 (UTC)<br /> | |||
'''The one who took this off the edit hold did so without reading the talk page.<br /> | |||
] (]) 01:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)''' | |||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] 00:05, 1 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
== userfy an article please == | |||
== Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
Hello, | |||
An article I created has been deleted. I want to recreate it correctly, but would like to be able to refer to the original content. Could you please userfy the article? It's "The Center to Prevent Youth Violence" | |||
Thanks! <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
'''Bold text''' | |||
] | |||
Hello <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:19, 24 October 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days. | |||
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
== Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] 00:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> | |||
== Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
<small>Delivered by ] on behalf of ] (]) at 15:36, 2 December 2011 (UTC).</small> | |||
] | |||
<!-- Delivery approved by ]. --> | |||
Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed. | |||
:Does simply editing my own talk page count as activity. If not, I guess I'll let it lapse. --] ] 16:54, 2 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
::It sure does. Cheers, –]] 19:58, 5 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at ]. | |||
== hey there == | |||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 00:06, 1 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
it is actually mentioned in the same article, that the occurrence is 10-30%. I have started to notice similar patterns in many wiki pages; different information within the same article. So, do you want me to cite the wikipedia article itself for the information (which wasnt cited before)? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:Ugh. That sort of thing happens when vandalism gets missed. I'll check it out and change it back, then remove the warning from your talk page. If you fill out the edit summary box, it makes it less likely that you'll be reverted. thanks for pointing it out to me. --] ] 16:57, 9 December 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:04, 4 March 2024
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. GraemeL has not edited Misplaced Pages since 1 September 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
This is GraemeL's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to him.
- I will reply here unless you ask me to reply somewhere else.
- If I posted something (other than a warning) to your talk page, I probably added it to my watch list. I would prefer replies in the same page as the original post. However, feel free to reply here if you want.
- If I missed an update on your talk page, please poke me with {{Talkback|your username}} on this page.
I am: OUT
Please click here to start a new topic.
Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19
24 December 2024 |
|
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, GraemeL. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, GraemeL. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 special circular
Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
View additional information
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:28, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:Ncv3nx.png
The file File:Ncv3nx.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
How we will see unregistered users
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
New administrator activity requirement
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, GraemeL. Please check your email; you've got mail!It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
SilkTork (talk) 01:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:05, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux 00:06, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Categories: