Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Spudpicker 01: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:55, 12 December 2011 editJeffro77 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,676 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:34, 14 December 2011 edit undoAlexandria (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,500 edits Archiving case to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Spudpicker 01/Archive 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SPI case status|CUrequest}}
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
{{SPIarchive notice|Spudpicker 01}} {{SPIarchive notice|Spudpicker 01}}
{{SPIpriorcases}} {{SPIpriorcases}}
=====<big>12 December 2011</big>=====

;Suspected sockpuppets


* {{checkip|1=98.92.242.93}}
* {{checkip|1=184.37.2.116}}
* {{checkip|1=74.176.181.204}}
* {{checkip|1=72.152.65.231}}

<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts-->
* <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small>

An anonymous editor has used several IP addresses in the last few days (in addition to those explicitly stated above, mostly 98.92.x.x); WHOIS indicates they are '''''all'' dynamic BellSouth.net IPs geolocated to Carrollton, Georgia, USA'''. (e.g. in , ] admits to being the same person who made as ].)
The editor has recently indicated his contempt for the system, taunting that because he has a dynamic IP, that "maybe you will succeed in getting this dynamic IP address banned for a few days too", limiting the repercussions against his inappropriate edits. He has been active at ] (and its Talk page) and at ]. The anonymous editor has been 'arguing' (really, just asserting that he ]) for several days for the deletion of ] (see ]). After being told an anonymous editor could not complete the nomination process, yesterday he 'threatened' that he would create an account ("Do you honestly think I cannot create a user account? really?") Today, a newly registered account, with no other edits, has claimed at the Talk page that, "I had to agree with the anonymous user above, this page seems to be highly slighted against witnesses, so I went ahead and completed the deletion request for the page for the anonymous user, since they weren't able to do so themselves." Whilst there would be no problem if the editor freely admitted to being the same person, there is a clear and deliberate attempt to mislead, by claiming that another editor supports his view. ] (]) 09:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small>


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======

----
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Latest revision as of 14:34, 14 December 2011

Spudpicker 01

Spudpicker 01 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Spudpicker 01/Archive.


Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Spudpicker 01: Difference between revisions Add topic