Misplaced Pages

Koenigs function: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:32, 28 December 2011 edit94.197.223.143 (talk) Existence and uniqueness of Koenigs function: punctuation← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:00, 7 November 2023 edit undoKku (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users115,679 editsm link ower series 
(26 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


==Existence and uniqueness of Koenigs function== ==Existence and uniqueness of Koenigs function==
Let ''D'' be the ] in the complex numbers. Let ''f'' be a ] mapping ''D'' into itself, fixing the point 0, with ''f'' not identically ''0'' and ''f'' not an automorphism of ''D'', i.e. a ] defined by a matrix in SU(1,1). By the ], ''f'' leaves invariant each disk ''|z|'' < ''r'' and the iterates of ''f'' converge uniformly on compacta to 0: if fact for 0 < ''r'' < 1, Let ''D'' be the ] in the complex numbers. Let {{mvar|f}} be a ] mapping ''D'' into itself, fixing the point 0, with {{mvar|f}} not identically 0 and {{mvar|f}} not an automorphism of ''D'', i.e. a ] defined by a matrix in SU(1,1).


By the ], {{mvar|f}} leaves invariant each disk |''z'' | < ''r'' and the iterates of {{mvar|f}} converge uniformly on compacta to 0: in fact for 0 < {{mvar|r}} < 1,
:<math> |f(z)|\le M(r) |z|</math> :<math> |f(z)|\le M(r) |z|</math>
for |''z'' | ≤ ''r'' with ''M''(''r'' ) < 1. Moreover {{mvar|f}} '(0) = {{mvar|λ}} with 0 < |{{mvar}}| < 1.
for |''z''| ≤ ''r'' with ''M''(''r'') < 1. Moreover ''f'' '(0) = λ with 0 < |λ| < 1.


{{harvtxt|Koenigs|1884}} proved that there is a unique holomorphic function ''h'' defined on ''D'', called the {{harvtxt|Koenigs|1884}} proved that there is a unique holomorphic function ''h'' defined on ''D'', called the '''Koenigs function''',
such that {{mvar|h}}(0) = 0, {{mvar|h}} '(0) = 1 and ] is satisfied,
'''Koenigs function'''
:<math> h(f(z))= f^\prime(0) h(z) ~.</math>
such that ''h''(0) = 0, ''h'''(0) = 1 and ] is satisfied:


The function ''h'' is ''the ] on ] of the normalized iterates'', <math>g_n(z)= \lambda^{-n} f^n(z)</math>.
:<math> h(f(z))= f^\prime(0) h(z).</math>


The function ''h'' is the uniform limit on compacta of the normalized iterates <math>g_n(z)= \lambda^{-n} f^n(z)</math>. Moreover if ''f'' is univalent so is ''h''. <ref>{{harvnb|Carleson|Gamelin|1993|p=28-32}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Shapiro|1993|p=90-93}}</ref> Moreover, if {{mvar|f}} is univalent, so is {{mvar|h}}.<ref>{{harvnb|Carleson|Gamelin|1993|pp=28–32}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Shapiro|1993|pp=90–93}}</ref>


As a consequence, when ''f'' (and hence ''h'') are univalent, ''D'' ca be identified with the open domain ''U'' = ''h''(''D''). Under this conformal identification, the mapping ''f'' becomes multiplication by λ, a dilation on ''U''. As a consequence, when {{mvar|f}} (and hence {{mvar|h}}) are univalent, {{mvar|D}} can be identified with the open domain {{math|''U'' {{=}} ''h''(''D'')}}. Under this conformal identification, the mapping &nbsp; {{mvar|f}} becomes multiplication by {{mvar|λ}}, a dilation on {{mvar|U}}.
===Proof===
*''Uniqueness''. If ''k'' is another solution then, by analyticity, it suffices to show that ''k'' = ''h'' near 0. Let <math> H=k\circ h^{-1} (z) </math> near 0. Thus ''H''(0) =0, ''H'''(0)=1 and for ''|z|'' small


===Proof===
::<math>\lambda H(z)=\lambda h(k^{-1} (z)) = h(f(k^{-1}(z))=h(k^{-1}(\lambda z)= H(\lambda z).</math>
*''Uniqueness''. If {{mvar|k}} is another solution then, by analyticity, it suffices to show that ''k'' = ''h'' near 0. Let
::<math> H=k\circ h^{-1} (z) </math>
:near 0. Thus ''H''(0) =0, ''H'''(0)=1 and, for |''z'' | small,
::<math>\lambda H(z)=\lambda h(k^{-1} (z)) = h(f(k^{-1}(z))=h(k^{-1}(\lambda z)= H(\lambda z)~.</math>


:Substituting into the power series for ''H'', it follows that ''H''(''z'') = ''z'' near 0. Hence ''h'' = ''k'' near 0. :Substituting into the ] for {{mvar|H}}, it follows that {{math|''H''(''z'') {{=}} ''z''}} near 0. Hence {{math|''h'' {{=}} ''k''}} near 0.


*''Existence''. If <math> F(z)=f(z)/\lambda z,</math> then by the ] *''Existence''. If <math> F(z)=f(z)/\lambda z,</math> then by the ]


::<math>|F(z) - 1|\le (1+|\lambda|^{-1})|z|</math> ::<math>|F(z) - 1|\le (1+|\lambda|^{-1})|z|~.</math>


:On the other hand :On the other hand,
::<math> g_n(z) = z\prod_{j=0}^{n-1} F(f^j(z))~.</math>


:Hence ''g''<sub>''n''</sub> converges uniformly for |''z''| ≤ ''r'' by the ] since
::<math> g_n(z) = z\prod_{j=0}^{n-1} F(f^j(z)).</math>

:Hence ''g''<sub>''n''</sub> converges uniformly for |''z''| ≤ ''r'' by the ] since


::<math> \sum \sup_{|z|\le r} |1 -F\circ f^j(z)| \le (1+|\lambda|^{-1}) \sum M(r)^j <\infty.</math> ::<math> \sum \sup_{|z|\le r} |1 -F\circ f^j(z)| \le (1+|\lambda|^{-1}) \sum M(r)^j <\infty.</math>


*''Univalence''. By ], since each ''g''<sup>''n''</sup> is univalent and normalized, i.e. fixes 0 and has derivative 1 there , their limit ''h'' is also univalent. *''Univalence''. By ], since each ''g''<sup>''n''</sup> is univalent and normalized, i.e. fixes 0 and has derivative 1 there , their limit {{mvar|h}} is also univalent.


==Koenigs function of a semigroup== ==Koenigs function of a semigroup==
Let <math>f_t(z)</math> be a semigroup of holomorphic univalent mappings of ''D'' into itself fixing 0 defined for <math> t\in [0,\infty)</math> such that Let {{math|''f''<sub>''t''</sub> (''z'')}} be a semigroup of holomorphic univalent mappings of {{mvar|D}} into itself fixing 0 defined
for {{math| ''t'' ∈ [0,)}} such that


*<math>f_s</math> is not an automorphism for ''s'' > 0 *<math>f_s</math> is not an automorphism for {{mvar|s}} > 0
*<math> f_s(f_t(z))=f_{t+s}(z)</math> *<math> f_s(f_t(z))=f_{t+s}(z)</math>
*<math> f_0(z)=z</math> *<math> f_0(z)=z</math>
*<math> f_t(z)</math> is jointly continuous in ''t'' and ''z'' *<math> f_t(z)</math> is jointly continuous in {{mvar|t}} and {{mvar|z}}


Each <math> f_s</math> with ''s'' > 0 has the same Koenigs function. In fact if ''h'' is the Koenigs function of ''f'' =''f''<sub>1</sub> then Each {{math|''f''<sub>''s''</sub>}} with {{mvar|s}} > 0 has the same Koenigs function, cf. ]. In fact, if ''h'' is the Koenigs function of
<math> h(f_s(z))</math> satisfies Schroeder's equation and hence is proportion to ''h''. Taking derivatives gives {{math|''f'' {{=}} ''f''<sub>1</sub>}}, then {{math|''h''(''f''<sub>''s''</sub>(''z''))}} satisfies Schroeder's equation and hence is proportion to ''h''.


Taking derivatives gives
:<math>h(f_s(z)) =f_s^\prime(0) h(z).</math> :<math>h(f_s(z)) =f_s^\prime(0) h(z).</math>
Hence {{mvar|h}} is the Koenigs function of {{math|''f''<sub>''s''</sub>}}.


Hence ''h'' is the Koenigs function of ''f''<sub>''s''</sub>.
==Structure of univalent semigroups== ==Structure of univalent semigroups==
On the domain ''U'' = ''h''(''D''), the maps ''f''<sub>''s''</sub> become multiplication by <math>\lambda(s)=f_s^\prime(0)</math>, a continuous semigroup. On the domain {{math|''U'' {{=}} ''h''(''D'')}}, the maps {{math|''f''<sub>''s''</sub>}} become multiplication by <math>\lambda(s)=f_s^\prime(0)</math>, a continuous semigroup.
So <math>\lambda(s)= e^{\mu s}</math> where μ is a uniquely determined solution of <math> e^\mu=\lambda</math> with Re μ < 0. It follows that the semigroup is differentiable at 0. Let So <math>\lambda(s)= e^{\mu s}</math> where {{mvar|μ}} is a uniquely determined solution of {{math|''e <sup>μ</sup> {{=}} λ''}} with Re{{mvar|μ}} < 0. It follows that the semigroup is differentiable at 0. Let

:<math> v(z)=\partial_t f_t(z)|_{t=0},</math> :<math> v(z)=\partial_t f_t(z)|_{t=0},</math>
a holomorphic function on {{mvar|D}} with ''v''(0) = 0 and {{math|''v'''(0)}} = {{mvar|μ}}.


Then
a holomorphic function on ''D'' with ''v''(0) = 0 and ''v'''(0) = μ. Then

:<math>\partial_t (f_t(z)) h^\prime(f_t(z))= \mu e^{\mu t} h(z)=\mu h(f_t(z)),</math> :<math>\partial_t (f_t(z)) h^\prime(f_t(z))= \mu e^{\mu t} h(z)=\mu h(f_t(z)),</math>

so that so that

:<math> v=v^\prime(0) {h\over h^\prime}</math> :<math> v=v^\prime(0) {h\over h^\prime}</math>

and and
:<math>\partial_t f_t(z) = v(f_t(z)),\,\,\, f_t(z)=0 ~,</math>

:<math>\partial_t f_t(z) = v(f_t(z)),\,\,\, f_t(z)=0</math>

the flow equation for a vector field. the flow equation for a vector field.


Restricting to the case with 0 < λ < 1, the ''h''(''D'') must be ] so that Restricting to the case with 0 < λ < 1, the ''h''(''D'') must be ] so that
:<math>\Re {zh^\prime(z)\over h(z)} \ge 0 ~.</math>

:<math>\Re {zh^\prime(z)\over h(z)} \ge 0</math>


Since the same result holds for the reciprocal, Since the same result holds for the reciprocal,
:<math> \Re {v(z)\over z}\le 0 ~,</math>

so that {{math|''v''(''z'')}} satisfies the conditions of {{harvtxt|Berkson|Porta|1978}}
:<math> \Re {v(z)\over z}\le 0.</math>

so that ''v''(''z'') satisfies the conditions of {{harvtxt|Berkson|Porta|1978}}

:<math> v(z)= z p(z),\,\,\, \Re p(z) \le 0, \,\,\, p^\prime(0) < 0.</math> :<math> v(z)= z p(z),\,\,\, \Re p(z) \le 0, \,\,\, p^\prime(0) < 0.</math>


Conversely, reversing the above steps, any holomorphic vector field ''v''(''z'') Conversely, reversing the above steps, any holomorphic vector field {{math|''v''(''z'')}} satisfying these conditions is associated to a semigroup {{math|''f''<sub>''t''</sub>}}, with
satisfying these conditions is associated to a semigroup ''f''<sub>''t''</sub>, with

:<math> h(z)= z \exp \int_0^z {v^\prime(0) \over v(w)} -{1\over w} \, dw.</math> :<math> h(z)= z \exp \int_0^z {v^\prime(0) \over v(w)} -{1\over w} \, dw.</math>


==Notes== ==Notes==
{{reflist}} {{reflist}}

==References== ==References==
*{{citation|last=Berkson|first=E.|last2= Porta|first2= H.|title=Semigroups of analytic functions and composition operators|journal= *{{citation|last=Berkson|first=E.|last2= Porta|first2= H.|title=Semigroups of analytic functions and composition operators|journal=Michigan Math. J.|volume= 25|year= 1978|pages= 101–115|doi=10.1307/mmj/1029002009|doi-access=free}}
*{{citation|last=Carleson|first=L.|last2=Gamelin|first2=T. D. W.|title=Complex dynamics|series=Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics|publisher=Springer-Verlag|year=1993|isbn=0-387-97942-5|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/complexdynamics0000carl}}
Michigan Math. J.|volume= 25|year= 1978|pages= 101–115}}
*{{citation|last2=Shoikhet|first2=D.|title=Linearization Models for Complex Dynamical Systems: Topics in Univalent Functions, Functional Equations and Semigroup Theory|volume=208|series= Operator Theory: Advances and Applications|first=M.|last= Elin|publisher=Springer|year= 2010|isbn= 978-3034605083}}
*{{citation|last=Carleson|first=L.|last2= Gamelin|first2= T. D. W.|title=Complex dynamics|series=
*{{citation|first=G.P.X.|last=Koenigs|title=Recherches sur les intégrales de certaines équations fonctionnelles|journal=Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup.|volume= 1|year=1884|pages= 2–41}}
Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics|publisher= Springer-Verlag|year=1993|id=ISBN 0-387-97942-5}}
*{{cite book |title=Functional equations in a single variable |last=Kuczma |first=Marek|authorlink=Marek Kuczma|series=Monografie Matematyczne |year=1968 |publisher=PWN – Polish Scientific Publishers |location=Warszawa}} ASIN: B0006BTAC2
*{{citation|last2=Shoikhet|first2=D.|title=Linearization Models for Complex Dynamical Systems: Topics in Univalent Functions, Functional Equations and Semigroup Theory|volume=208|series= Operator Theory: Advances and Applications|first=M.|last= Elin|publisher=Springer|year= 2010|id=ISBN 303460508}}
*{{citation|first=G.P.X.|last=Koenigs|title=Recherches sur les intégrales de certaines équations fonctionnelles|journal=Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup.|volume= 1|year=1884|pages= 2–41}} *{{citation|last=Shapiro|first=J. H.|title=Composition operators and classical function theory|series=Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics|publisher= Springer-Verlag|year= 1993|isbn=0-387-94067-7}}
*{{citation|last=Shapiro|first=J. H.|title=Composition operators and classical function theory|series=Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics|publisher= Springer-Verlag|year= 1993|id=ISBN 0-387-94067-7}} *{{citation|last=Shoikhet|first=D.|title=Semigroups in geometrical function theory|publisher= Kluwer Academic Publishers|year= 2001|isbn=0-7923-7111-9 }}
*{{citation|last=Shoikhet|first=D.|title=Semigroups in geometrical function theory|publisher= Kluwer Academic Publishers|year= 2001|id=ISBN 0-7923-7111-9 }}


] ]
] ]
]

Latest revision as of 09:00, 7 November 2023

In mathematics, the Koenigs function is a function arising in complex analysis and dynamical systems. Introduced in 1884 by the French mathematician Gabriel Koenigs, it gives a canonical representation as dilations of a univalent holomorphic mapping, or a semigroup of mappings, of the unit disk in the complex numbers into itself.

Existence and uniqueness of Koenigs function

Let D be the unit disk in the complex numbers. Let f be a holomorphic function mapping D into itself, fixing the point 0, with f not identically 0 and f not an automorphism of D, i.e. a Möbius transformation defined by a matrix in SU(1,1).

By the Denjoy-Wolff theorem, f leaves invariant each disk |z | < r and the iterates of f converge uniformly on compacta to 0: in fact for 0 < r < 1,

| f ( z ) | M ( r ) | z | {\displaystyle |f(z)|\leq M(r)|z|}

for |z | ≤ r with M(r ) < 1. Moreover f '(0) = λ with 0 < |λ| < 1.

Koenigs (1884) proved that there is a unique holomorphic function h defined on D, called the Koenigs function, such that h(0) = 0, h '(0) = 1 and Schröder's equation is satisfied,

h ( f ( z ) ) = f ( 0 ) h ( z )   . {\displaystyle h(f(z))=f^{\prime }(0)h(z)~.}

The function h is the uniform limit on compacta of the normalized iterates, g n ( z ) = λ n f n ( z ) {\displaystyle g_{n}(z)=\lambda ^{-n}f^{n}(z)} .

Moreover, if f is univalent, so is h.

As a consequence, when f (and hence h) are univalent, D can be identified with the open domain U = h(D). Under this conformal identification, the mapping   f becomes multiplication by λ, a dilation on U.

Proof

  • Uniqueness. If k is another solution then, by analyticity, it suffices to show that k = h near 0. Let
H = k h 1 ( z ) {\displaystyle H=k\circ h^{-1}(z)}
near 0. Thus H(0) =0, H'(0)=1 and, for |z | small,
λ H ( z ) = λ h ( k 1 ( z ) ) = h ( f ( k 1 ( z ) ) = h ( k 1 ( λ z ) = H ( λ z )   . {\displaystyle \lambda H(z)=\lambda h(k^{-1}(z))=h(f(k^{-1}(z))=h(k^{-1}(\lambda z)=H(\lambda z)~.}
Substituting into the power series for H, it follows that H(z) = z near 0. Hence h = k near 0.
  • Existence. If F ( z ) = f ( z ) / λ z , {\displaystyle F(z)=f(z)/\lambda z,} then by the Schwarz lemma
| F ( z ) 1 | ( 1 + | λ | 1 ) | z |   . {\displaystyle |F(z)-1|\leq (1+|\lambda |^{-1})|z|~.}
On the other hand,
g n ( z ) = z j = 0 n 1 F ( f j ( z ) )   . {\displaystyle g_{n}(z)=z\prod _{j=0}^{n-1}F(f^{j}(z))~.}
Hence gn converges uniformly for |z| ≤ r by the Weierstrass M-test since
sup | z | r | 1 F f j ( z ) | ( 1 + | λ | 1 ) M ( r ) j < . {\displaystyle \sum \sup _{|z|\leq r}|1-F\circ f^{j}(z)|\leq (1+|\lambda |^{-1})\sum M(r)^{j}<\infty .}
  • Univalence. By Hurwitz's theorem, since each g is univalent and normalized, i.e. fixes 0 and has derivative 1 there , their limit h is also univalent.

Koenigs function of a semigroup

Let ft (z) be a semigroup of holomorphic univalent mappings of D into itself fixing 0 defined for t ∈ [0, ∞) such that

  • f s {\displaystyle f_{s}} is not an automorphism for s > 0
  • f s ( f t ( z ) ) = f t + s ( z ) {\displaystyle f_{s}(f_{t}(z))=f_{t+s}(z)}
  • f 0 ( z ) = z {\displaystyle f_{0}(z)=z}
  • f t ( z ) {\displaystyle f_{t}(z)} is jointly continuous in t and z

Each fs with s > 0 has the same Koenigs function, cf. iterated function. In fact, if h is the Koenigs function of f = f1, then h(fs(z)) satisfies Schroeder's equation and hence is proportion to h.

Taking derivatives gives

h ( f s ( z ) ) = f s ( 0 ) h ( z ) . {\displaystyle h(f_{s}(z))=f_{s}^{\prime }(0)h(z).}

Hence h is the Koenigs function of fs.

Structure of univalent semigroups

On the domain U = h(D), the maps fs become multiplication by λ ( s ) = f s ( 0 ) {\displaystyle \lambda (s)=f_{s}^{\prime }(0)} , a continuous semigroup. So λ ( s ) = e μ s {\displaystyle \lambda (s)=e^{\mu s}} where μ is a uniquely determined solution of e = λ with Reμ < 0. It follows that the semigroup is differentiable at 0. Let

v ( z ) = t f t ( z ) | t = 0 , {\displaystyle v(z)=\partial _{t}f_{t}(z)|_{t=0},}

a holomorphic function on D with v(0) = 0 and v'(0) = μ.

Then

t ( f t ( z ) ) h ( f t ( z ) ) = μ e μ t h ( z ) = μ h ( f t ( z ) ) , {\displaystyle \partial _{t}(f_{t}(z))h^{\prime }(f_{t}(z))=\mu e^{\mu t}h(z)=\mu h(f_{t}(z)),}

so that

v = v ( 0 ) h h {\displaystyle v=v^{\prime }(0){h \over h^{\prime }}}

and

t f t ( z ) = v ( f t ( z ) ) , f t ( z ) = 0   , {\displaystyle \partial _{t}f_{t}(z)=v(f_{t}(z)),\,\,\,f_{t}(z)=0~,}

the flow equation for a vector field.

Restricting to the case with 0 < λ < 1, the h(D) must be starlike so that

z h ( z ) h ( z ) 0   . {\displaystyle \Re {zh^{\prime }(z) \over h(z)}\geq 0~.}

Since the same result holds for the reciprocal,

v ( z ) z 0   , {\displaystyle \Re {v(z) \over z}\leq 0~,}

so that v(z) satisfies the conditions of Berkson & Porta (1978)

v ( z ) = z p ( z ) , p ( z ) 0 , p ( 0 ) < 0. {\displaystyle v(z)=zp(z),\,\,\,\Re p(z)\leq 0,\,\,\,p^{\prime }(0)<0.}

Conversely, reversing the above steps, any holomorphic vector field v(z) satisfying these conditions is associated to a semigroup ft, with

h ( z ) = z exp 0 z v ( 0 ) v ( w ) 1 w d w . {\displaystyle h(z)=z\exp \int _{0}^{z}{v^{\prime }(0) \over v(w)}-{1 \over w}\,dw.}

Notes

  1. Carleson & Gamelin 1993, pp. 28–32
  2. Shapiro 1993, pp. 90–93

References

  • Berkson, E.; Porta, H. (1978), "Semigroups of analytic functions and composition operators", Michigan Math. J., 25: 101–115, doi:10.1307/mmj/1029002009
  • Carleson, L.; Gamelin, T. D. W. (1993), Complex dynamics, Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-97942-5
  • Elin, M.; Shoikhet, D. (2010), Linearization Models for Complex Dynamical Systems: Topics in Univalent Functions, Functional Equations and Semigroup Theory, Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, vol. 208, Springer, ISBN 978-3034605083
  • Koenigs, G.P.X. (1884), "Recherches sur les intégrales de certaines équations fonctionnelles", Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup., 1: 2–41
  • Kuczma, Marek (1968). Functional equations in a single variable. Monografie Matematyczne. Warszawa: PWN – Polish Scientific Publishers. ASIN: B0006BTAC2
  • Shapiro, J. H. (1993), Composition operators and classical function theory, Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-94067-7
  • Shoikhet, D. (2001), Semigroups in geometrical function theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 0-7923-7111-9
Categories: