Revision as of 20:29, 6 January 2012 editShrike (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,544 edits →Further reading← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:20, 29 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,087 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Israeli settlement/Archive 13) (bot | ||
(980 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}} | |||
{{Talk header|search=yes}} | {{Talk header|search=yes}} | ||
{{Auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot I|age=3|units=months|small=no|dounreplied=yes}} | |||
<!-- Do not remove the sanction template --> | <!-- Do not remove the sanction template --> | ||
{{ARBPIA}} | |||
{{Arab-Israeli Arbitration Enforcement}} | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1= | |||
{{sanctions|''' See ] for details.'''}} | |||
{{WikiProject Israel|importance=Mid}} | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | |||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Palestine|importance=high|attention=yes}} | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Syria|importance=mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject Egypt|importance=low}} | |||
{{WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration}} | {{WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration}} | ||
{{WikiProject Cities}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | ||
|maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 13 | ||
|minthreadsleft = 4 | |minthreadsleft = 4 | ||
|algo = old( |
|algo = old(180d) | ||
|archive = Talk:Israeli settlement/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Talk:Israeli settlement/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 22: | Line 24: | ||
|leading_zeros=0 | |leading_zeros=0 | ||
|indexhere=yes}} | |indexhere=yes}} | ||
{{Broken anchors|links= | |||
* <nowiki>]</nowiki> The anchor (#Ulpana lawsuits) is no longer available because it was ] before. <!-- {"title":"Ulpana lawsuits","appear":{"revid":554432036,"parentid":554430719,"timestamp":"2013-05-10T11:49:45Z","replaced_anchors":{"Ulpana lawsuit":"Ulpana lawsuits"},"removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":},"disappear":{"revid":725072007,"parentid":725062973,"timestamp":"2016-06-13T11:20:49Z","removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":}} --> | |||
}} | |||
== Demographics == | |||
I haven't found in the resources the data of the just 2300 Jews in East Jerusalem in 1948. According to the data in ] the population in the whole Jerusalem was of 100 000 Jews, 40 000 Muslims and 25 000 Christians in the same year. --] (]) 19:04, 23 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
How is it possible for any of the land on the West Bank to be 'Palestinian' owned? The land was annexed, ilegally, by Jordan in 1948 and handed to the PLO sometime after the 1967 War, again, illegally. Palestine has never existed as a separate, legal state. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:45, 29 November 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
⚫ | == |
||
The 52nd cited link is broken, I don't know how to fix it but if someone could either find the right link or take it down and the information taken from it that would be great! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 12:56, 16 November 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Colony vs Civilian Community == | |||
P | |||
I changed the opening sentences of the article and my edits were reverted. The original paragraph was: | |||
''An Israeli settlement is a Jewish civilian community built on land that was captured by Israel from Jordan, Egypt, and Syria during the 1967 Six-Day War and is considered occupied territory by the international community. Such settlements currently exist in the West Bank. Israeli neighborhoods in East Jerusalem and communities in the Golan Heights, areas which have been annexed by Israel, are considered settlements by the international community, which does not recognize Israel's annexations of these territories.'' | |||
and I changed it to this: | |||
== Haaretz article: "Secret 1970 document confirms first West Bank settlements built on a lie." == | |||
''An Israeli settlement is an Israeli colony illegally built on land captured by Israel from Jordan, Egypt, and Syria during the 1967 Six-Day War. These colonies are built on occupied territory. Such unlawful settlements currently exist in the West Bank. There are also Israeli colonies in East Jerusalem and communities in the Golan Heights, areas which have been annexed by Israel.'' | |||
Haaretz - Yotam Berger - , 28 July 2016. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span> | |||
My rationale for rephrasing the paragraph was that you don't call dwellings on illegally occupied territories civilian communities but colonies. | |||
== Security isn't a "pretext" == | |||
Another reason is that the emotional impact of the former is little more than this: | |||
Under '''4.2 Settlement Policy''', the article reads "The government abrogated the prohibition from purchasing occupied land by Israelis; the "Drobles Plan", a plan for large-scale settlement in the West Bank meant to prevent a Palestinian state under the pretext of security became the framework for its policy." | |||
''The strike on Twin Towers on 11 September, 2001 was a violent act committed by some students getting pilot training in the United States. This led to the death of more than 3,000 people including the students after they knowingly smashed their planes in the buildings. The international community considers it an act of terrorism but this view is not universal and has its critics who claim the students acted out of frustration.'' | |||
The dictionary definition of pretext is ''something that is put forward to conceal a true purpose or object; an ostensible reason; excuse''. | |||
I was told to make my case here. That's good. So, anyone who thinks what I did was wrong? And kindly tell why? :) | |||
The provided citation doesn't support the copy in the wiki article. The document doesn't say that security was a pretext. The document says security is one of several reasons to develop the settlements. The cited article reads, "The following are the principles which guided the plan: 1. Settlement throughout the entire Land of Israel is for security and by right, A strip of settlements at strategic sites enhances both internal and external security alike, as well as making concrete and realizing our right to Eretz Israel..." | |||
] (]) 14:50, 20 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
So the article isn't even denying that it assumes that the Israelis have some sort of biblical or historical right to Israel, BUT it also argues that the settlements would improve security. | |||
:I'm copying this from my talk page as it belongs here. If you think the article and its lead do not give due weight to the view that these are colonies and the occupation is an act of colonization, you need to compile high quality (preferably academic) secondary sources that examine and describe this perspective, then make your case. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']'''</small> 15:16, 20 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
There is also the matter that the same section of this article implies that these cited documents were written by representatives of the Israeli government; they were not, they were written by departments of the World Zionist Organization which is an NGO and not directed by the Israeli government. It was essentially written by a think tank advocating a certain perspective but the article casts it as from the central government planning office. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) </small> | |||
== Settlements as colonies == | |||
⚫ | == ICJ == | ||
Thank you, ], for engaging in this discussion and for referring me to the “Due and undue weight” section of the Misplaced Pages NPOV advice. If you look a little further down on the NPOV page you will find the section on “Good research” which advises “Good and unbiased research, based upon the best and most reputable authoritative sources available, helps prevent NPOV disagreements. Try the library for reputable books and journal articles,...” | |||
This is what I have done (in line with the suggestion on this talk page on 20 Nov 2011). Any similar investigation would indicate to you that the settlements have quite commonly been characterised as colonies over a significant time period in a wide range of fields, as diverse as architecture, critical theory, cultural studies, geography, planning, peace and conflict studies, politics, social theory, as well as in non-academic discourse. This discussion is an important part of the discussion of Israeli settlements in Palestine and should be addressed. | |||
The findings of the ICJ should be treated factually and not on a POV and attribution basis. I.e. I am in favor of the settlements being simply called illegal in the opening sentence, as described by every major RS. ] (]) 09:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
I am not sure what you meant by “so accessible to me references don't say that settlement= colony.”? However to reassure you I have cited a definition of settlement as colony. (Baltzer, 2007:391) | |||
:Given that now have an authoritative statement of the law on this matter, it should be straightforward to find RS reporting of same without caveats, it really doesn't matter any more whether "Israel disputes this" other than as historical background, imo this boilerplate should be removed from articles. There was a consensus about it somewhere but I forget where, perhaps it needs revisiting now. ] (]) 09:40, 23 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
Misplaced Pages NPOV also advises that “it may be appropriate to mention alternative names and the controversies over their use” and I hope we can do this in a scholarly manner, introducing the idea with a single word in the introduction and expanding it in later section, with an appropriate heading. I have replaced the reference to settlements as colonies and hope this will enable us to begin to properly represent discussion of the use of the word “colony” in the contexts of Israeli settlements. | |||
::Agreed; it should be Israel's arguments were refuted, rather than the classical and boring "Israel disputes this", which to me always sounded like writing on ]: "The earth is round, but flat earthers dispute this." ] (]) 09:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::OK, existing consensus ] (thanks to {{Re|Sean.hoyland}} for the link). | |||
:::It would seem that the situation has changed, even before the ICJ opinion, the US accepts (once again, post Trump) that the settlements are illegal so together with the opinion, that seems sufficient to reopen the question with a view to removing the "Israel disputes this" part and possibly rewording the rest. ] (]) 11:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 July 2024 == | |||
I hope that you will contribute to this section by providing material which will help improve this article remembering that “Misplaced Pages describes disputes. Misplaced Pages does not engage in disputes.” | |||
{{Edit extended-protected|Israeli settlement|answered=yes}} | |||
I suggest that the latest 2023 west bank access restrictions map from OCHA be added. Link provided below: | |||
https://www.ochaopt.org/content/west-bank-access-restrictions-may-2023 ] (]) 18:59, 28 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
:] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:EEp --> It's a good map, but unfortunately it's . <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 01:07, 4 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
::{{re|CanonNi}} https://commons.wikimedia.org/Template:PD-UN-map ] (]) 10:36, 4 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
== create page: ] == | |||
We also need to work together to improve this article in both organisation and reliability – there are too many assertions inadequately supported, for example does the definition of settlement as “civilian community” adequately areas such as Barkan near Salfit which is in effect an industrial settlement? This definition of Israeli settlement is not supported by any reference or citation so I think it is unreasonable to exclude the alternative description which is well supported. And most if not all of the settlement/colonies on the West Bank are populated by members of the Israeli military and are more heavily armed than any normal civilian community. ] (]) 08:26, 5 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
:First of all it shame that you didn't answered my question on the talk page. So I will ask it here too: “Did you ever edited Misplaced Pages under different user name?”. Second you was reverted so you instead of engaging in edit war that you currently are you should have used a talk page and only after reaching a consensus you should do any change please read ] and kindly revert yourself.Third most of the sources use term ] only minority of sources use term colony so per ] it shouldn't be in the lead. We could make a section how anti-Zionist and New Historian circles term Israeli civilian communities and Judea and Samaria but thier view is a minority view.--] (]) 17:00, 5 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Miriel2012, setting aside the question regarding ] which you should answer on your talk page rather than here and the ] issue (which another user needs reminding of at ], ] and ]), I think you are going about things the wrong way around. If you think the article should discuss the colonization/colony aspect (and I think it should), you should develop the article content first and leave the lead alone for the time being. The lead is both a summary of the article body and it should include significant alternative names per ]. Since there is no content in the article body about this and nothing to indicate whether colony is a significant alternative term I don't think the term belongs in the lead right now. The article ] may be of interest if you haven't seen it. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']'''</small> 17:36, 5 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Also, for the record, I don't think someone like at the University of Haifa could be described as either an anti-Zionist or a New Historian even though . He's an Urban and Regional planner and Geographer. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']'''</small> 18:18, 5 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::But as I understand its more political term so ] should be backed by political scientist?--] (]) 18:24, 5 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::I think that's circular reasoning because it's based on the premise that colony is a political term. It's a bit like arguing that using a word is a sin therefore the sources discussing the word should be religious studies experts. Khamaisi, who I think is clearly a reliable source, isn't using the term in a politically charged way, he's using it as a geographer, but others do as you say. I think the politicization of the word for many is just one aspect of it in this context. in ''A companion to postcolonial studies'' has some useful background on the terminology. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']'''</small> 18:47, 5 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
# unofficial | |||
==Further reading== | |||
# official | |||
I see that everything was removed. I have to disagree with "rv per WP:LINKFARM and WP:EL. the onus is on whoever wants to include to explain why all these links are necessary". Editors can't just remove everything from an article section and then put the onus on others to justify restoration. It works both ways. Removals need to be justified too. Some of those links may be okay and so their removal is potentially not okay. I suggest restoring it and working through it to remove the non-compliant links. There's no rush. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']'''</small> 01:58, 6 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 02:55, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Feel free to find out which links are OK and restore those. The onus, as is usual practice in wikipedia, is on those who want to add or restore the information. That there "may be" some okay links in there is not a good enough reason to restore the whole linkfarm. ] (]) 04:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
::the onus is on those who wish to remove this material. The links will be restored.] (]) 20:22, 6 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::Did you read ]? |
Latest revision as of 12:20, 29 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Israeli settlement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
|
Haaretz article: "Secret 1970 document confirms first West Bank settlements built on a lie."
Haaretz - Yotam Berger - Secret 1970 document confirms first West Bank settlements built on a lie, 28 July 2016. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZScarpia (talk • contribs)
Security isn't a "pretext"
Under 4.2 Settlement Policy, the article reads "The government abrogated the prohibition from purchasing occupied land by Israelis; the "Drobles Plan", a plan for large-scale settlement in the West Bank meant to prevent a Palestinian state under the pretext of security became the framework for its policy."
The dictionary definition of pretext is something that is put forward to conceal a true purpose or object; an ostensible reason; excuse.
The provided citation doesn't support the copy in the wiki article. The document doesn't say that security was a pretext. The document says security is one of several reasons to develop the settlements. The cited article reads, "The following are the principles which guided the plan: 1. Settlement throughout the entire Land of Israel is for security and by right, A strip of settlements at strategic sites enhances both internal and external security alike, as well as making concrete and realizing our right to Eretz Israel..."
So the article isn't even denying that it assumes that the Israelis have some sort of biblical or historical right to Israel, BUT it also argues that the settlements would improve security.
There is also the matter that the same section of this article implies that these cited documents were written by representatives of the Israeli government; they were not, they were written by departments of the World Zionist Organization which is an NGO and not directed by the Israeli government. It was essentially written by a think tank advocating a certain perspective but the article casts it as from the central government planning office. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.54.105.157 (talk)
ICJ
The findings of the ICJ should be treated factually and not on a POV and attribution basis. I.e. I am in favor of the settlements being simply called illegal in the opening sentence, as described by every major RS. Makeandtoss (talk) 09:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Given that now have an authoritative statement of the law on this matter, it should be straightforward to find RS reporting of same without caveats, it really doesn't matter any more whether "Israel disputes this" other than as historical background, imo this boilerplate should be removed from articles. There was a consensus about it somewhere but I forget where, perhaps it needs revisiting now. Selfstudier (talk) 09:40, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed; it should be Israel's arguments were refuted, rather than the classical and boring "Israel disputes this", which to me always sounded like writing on Earth: "The earth is round, but flat earthers dispute this." Makeandtoss (talk) 09:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- OK, existing consensus Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration/Current Article Issues/Archive. Legality of Israeli settlements (thanks to @Sean.hoyland: for the link).
- It would seem that the situation has changed, even before the ICJ opinion, the US accepts (once again, post Trump) that the settlements are illegal so together with the opinion, that seems sufficient to reopen the question with a view to removing the "Israel disputes this" part and possibly rewording the rest. Selfstudier (talk) 11:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed; it should be Israel's arguments were refuted, rather than the classical and boring "Israel disputes this", which to me always sounded like writing on Earth: "The earth is round, but flat earthers dispute this." Makeandtoss (talk) 09:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 July 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I suggest that the latest 2023 west bank access restrictions map from OCHA be added. Link provided below: https://www.ochaopt.org/content/west-bank-access-restrictions-may-2023 TheTrackRecord (talk) 18:59, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: It's a good map, but unfortunately it's copyrighted. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 01:07, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
create page: Israelification of land
- unofficial
- official
2A02:2149:8B02:4F00:51D1:3E49:2755:6F87 (talk) 02:55, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories:- B-Class Israel-related articles
- Mid-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- B-Class Palestine-related articles
- High-importance Palestine-related articles
- Palestine-related articles needing attention
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- B-Class Syria articles
- Mid-importance Syria articles
- WikiProject Syria articles
- B-Class Egypt articles
- Low-importance Egypt articles
- WikiProject Egypt articles
- WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration articles
- B-Class WikiProject Cities articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages