| Revision as of 17:31, 7 April 2006 editMel Etitis (talk | contribs)60,375 edits Messenger← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:44, 26 November 2023 edit undoDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers236,023 edits not around since Dec 2006 | ||
| (184 intermediate revisions by 61 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=5 December 2006}} | |||
| <center><div style="background-color: #f0f0ff; border: none; padding: 5px; width: 300px;">For older discussion, see ''''''</div></center> | |||
| {{busy|]}} | |||
| <br> | |||
| <div class="center"><div style="background-color: #f0f0ff; border: none; padding: 5px; width: 300px;">For older discussion, see '''''' '''''' '''''' '''''' '''''' ''''''</div></div> | |||
| == Abu Nasr Mansur and more == | |||
| == addLoadEvent == | |||
| Hi, while MB's edits to ] officially aren't vandalism, they come quite close to it. You might want to consider starting an ] against him. On ], while claiming on certain biographies that the person is Persian (whicn in one case he was right and in others, I haven't checked) he also removed other true information such as arabic names, which is vandalism. Regarding reverting your edits to ]. You ''really'' need to thouroughly read ], ] and ]. The website your provided isn't a reliable source and encyclopedia britannica says he waws arab, so if you want to change it to persian you will have to a bit more effort. This would probably include a trip to the library to find some books writting by professor such and such which clearly states he wa persian or find a very reliable source like SouthernComfort did with al-Khwarizmi. Cheers, —'']'' 21:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, one of your user scripts uses the <code>addLoadEvent( ''func'' )</code> function (see ). This function will be removed from ] soon. Please modify your scripts to use <code>addOnloadHook( ''func'' )</code> instead. —'']'' 18:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Iran== | |||
| Regarding your edit . You're in the talks. Why are you reverting a well-sourced edit? ]<sup>]</sup> 03:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==mistakes== | |||
| == Parsi revert war (and debate) == | |||
| Salam(dorud). | |||
| I found some mistakes in Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Iran. | |||
| Please see ] and make your point. -- ] 17:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *1-]: | |||
| There is a template which said "User Sassanid" but shows map of the Achaemenid . So I suggest to change the picture or name of it. Please don't tell me it's not an article so it can be wrong. Ufrate(forat) was the western border of sassanid's territory most of the time. | |||
| *2-Timeline of Dynasties of Iran: There was some semi-independent government in Iran between ] and ] which are called estila(with sword) and estekfa(with permition). They have dependent autority but they didn't have legitimacy without permittion of kalif, although kalif was under their domination during buwayhids and siljukids. I suggest to use different colors to show different type of government. Also from Timurids to Safavids there were mulukattavayefi and there might be more than 5 government in one time. --] 03:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Two Articles in need of your attention== | |||
| == Angels == | |||
| There are two entries at Misplaced Pages, which have falsely created -- they are ] and ]. Both entries are factitious. I have requested the entries to be deleted. My reasons are: | |||
| Regarding ] I don't necessarily disagree with the text. But I don't believe that the intro is the best place for it and I believe there was a section being added for that information if you read the discussion. Also in the discussion there are several people who agree that the text should be moved. Citation doesn't mean it should just go anywhere.] 06:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :''The term '''Turko-Persian Tradition''' (or '''Turco-Persian''') does not exists academically and it is a factitious entry! Check the ] to confirm -- The correct name for that culture is the ] culture not the "Turko-Persian". Turkophones (mostly of mixed race and Persianized in culture) only spoke in Turkic dialects and were in the military. That is not enough participation in creating and forming the culture to deserve the name "Turko-Persian Tradition" – This is misinformation. All the elements in that area, which have to do with tradition and culture, were drawn from the Iranian culture and the Islamic faith, not much Turkic elements (like shamanism, yurts etc.) were incorporated in. That is what makes the name "Turko-Persian" an imaginary one and therefore the entry should be deleted.'' | |||
| Any contributions would greatly appreciated. Bā Sepās ] 02:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Turkish Kurdistan == | |||
| ==3RR== | |||
| You're about to violate ] in ]. I think you're already familiar with how it works, so I'm just letting you know in case you didn't know that you were reverting excessively. ]<sup>]</sup> 09:32, 15 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Ben bu madde hakkında adminlere bir şikayette bulunmayı düşünüyorum bu maddenin adının doğruluğundan şüpheli olan herkesin şikayet etmesinin daha etkili olacağını düşünüyorum bunun için yardım etmek isterseniz cevabınızı bekliyorum] | |||
| ==Acuman is trying to get you in trouble== | |||
| == AfD == | |||
| The warning the guy gave you is what he does to everyone who corrects him or wont let him put his biased pro-Israeli nonsense on an article. First he worked on fermenting the Kurdish articles and is now pushing on to Iran while his partners have moved to other articles such as Iraq. Go look at the Iraq discussion and you will see how they are trying to manipulate information for public opinion. ] 18:11, 15 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi {{PAGENAME}}, this is a message I'm posting to everyone who participated in ]. I have nominated the same article for deletion again ] – you might be interested. Regards, ]] 09:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Persians == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| You didn't revert Lukas' edit, you reverted mine instead. Look his edit. --] 00:40, 16 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :ManiF, I'm not going to get involved much in the question of that wording, but I'd appreciate if you didn't just throw away my proposal simply because it came from me. This was a well-meaning compromise suggestion (and very much in your favour, actually). If you don't like it, you could at least give a reason and not an ] rejection. ] <small><sup>]|]</sup></small> 08:35, 16 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692007949 --> | |||
| :: The reasons were already stated on talk. --] 09:00, 16 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Hi == | |||
| Please take a look at ], if you have time. Cheers! --]17:54, 18 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Thanks for your message. I don't really know much about this business — I simply gave my opinion on a particular misdescription in one of InShaneee's comments. I'll have a look, but if it's at all long and complicated I probably shan't be able to say much more for a while. --] (]) 14:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Suggestion == | |||
| Ask Zereshk and SouthernComfort what they think. I'm not Persian so I hardly know anything on this subject. Perhaps you could add a merge tag to the articles, and say on the talk page why they should be merged, but I don't really know. --] 18:32, 19 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :He also created ]. --] 18:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==User:Diyako is trying to make an alternative ficticious definition of Newroz== | |||
| User:Diyako has created an article on a Turkic-Nowruz without mention of its Iranian history and roots. Soon we will here Nowruz has nothing to do with Iran too. His article is ]. This should be merged or edited properly. He has gone on the Turkish discussions to promote it. | |||
| Here is what user:Diyako has written; | |||
| '''Nevruz is the spring festival among Turkic-speaking nations, from Turkey to Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan etc. It is very similar to the Iranian festival of Norouz.''' | |||
| '''According to Turkish legends Nevruz dates back to era of Gökturks.''' | |||
| Th user Diyako is definnityl anti-Iranian and has an anti-Iranian agenda. | |||
| Nevruz is not very similar to the Irnian festival of Norouz it is Norouz! | |||
| He has claimed the Kurdish flag has nothing to do with Iran and is a crime to fly in Iran. The Kurdish flag is based on the Iranian flag it is even in the memories of the founders of the Mehbad Republic who wanted to showcase their Aryan and Mede heritage. Back then Kurds only had a oral history about their only know ancestors the Mede and Mede heritage, before other ancestors were accepted. The Sun is also very significant element of ancient Iranian and Zorasatrianism. Diyako is misleading everyone. Go to Kurdistan 20 years ago let alone 50 they will say we are Aryans and our own blood relatives are the Persians. The Kurdish flag is not banned in Iran and is based on Iranian colours. This user also claims the Iranians are only a lingustic group after he saw that the tide was against him that Kurds are in definition an Iranian people so he worked to undermine the definition of Iranian people and even Persians with user:Acuman. | |||
| ] 21:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Additionally, even though there have been warnings made about the provocative term of Farsi and its offensive conotations he is intitionally using the term to upset users and saying Iranians wikis are unreliable and making attcks on the community. See his talk page. ] 22:38, 19 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| The user Diyako is definnityl not anti-Iranian .. ] 13:54, 21 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Ok == | |||
| Ok, I'll find the diffs. --] 00:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Ok, here are the diffs: , , . --] 00:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Happy New Year == | |||
| Har Roozetan Norouz, Norouzetan Pirooz هر روزتا ن نوروز , نوروزتان پيروز . ] 13:10, 20 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbcom == | |||
| Sorry for doing this on Norouz, but I've named you as a potential party in the Aucaman Arbcom case. Please see ]. Thank you, --] <small><sup>]|]</sup></small> 10:57, 21 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Kurds == | |||
| The Kurdish People is a Irania People ::: That is correct --] | |||
| ==Re: Greetings== | |||
| No, as far as I know it is English/Norman. And it is spelled "Parham". Cheers, ] ] 01:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==HAPPY NEW YEAR== | |||
| <b><font color="#00aa00">]</font>] </b>] 10:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Aucaman == | |||
| Thank you for bringing those diffs to my attention. I have left a note on his talk page about both of them. He has been acting more civil lately, so hopefully this will be another push in the right direction. --] 20:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Aryan == | |||
| hi | |||
| What do you think of this as an intro for the history section on Persian people. | |||
| (It is just a rough draft so farther editing might be needed) | |||
| '''The Persians of Iran are descendants of the Aryans (link to Britannica) that migrated to the region during the 2nd millennium BC, as well as peoples indigenous to the Iranian plateau such as the Elamites. | |||
| '''The Persian language and other Iranian tongues all arrived with the Aryans after they split into two major groups, the Medes and the Persians. '''''' | |||
| This way no one will make a mistake thinking that Aryan is a synonym for ancient Iranian and if the only concern of Aucaman is this then he should not object to this. | |||
| thank you | |||
| ] 20:54, 22 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == You too == | |||
| Happy Norooz! :) --] 00:25, 23 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :BTW, can you please help me out on the ] and ] pages? Thanks. --] 00:26, 23 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Khayli mamnoon agha, eid-e shomaham mobarak. ] 01:35, 23 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Geber== | |||
| Khwarizmi is a bad example since much is known about his life and thus we are able to know his ethnic background. However, with a figure like Geber things are quite a bit more complicated since his actual identity is very obscure. The only thing that can be said with any certainty was that he wrote in Arabic. Most of the sources available seem to identify him as an Arab. I've never seen a source that states he was Persian. If you have sources which clearly identify his ethnicity as Persian or "Iranian stock" then that's something. Otherwise you're going to have a very difficult time convincing people. My suggestion is to compromise. ] 02:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :If a compromise was agreed upon, then why all the problems? ] 03:40, 23 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::The problem is that you have far more sources identifying him as Arab than Iranian - how many are there that identify him as Iranian? The important question in this is "can you cite sources?" ] 03:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Unfortunately, that link is useless because it is not a proper article or a scholarly source. Are you able to quote the books that state he was Persian? At any rate, if all the editors involved are fine with just "Shi'a Muslim" then feel free to return the article to the original compromise version. However, it doesn't seem like ] agrees with that. ] 04:03, 23 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Check your email. ] 04:07, 23 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Please revert your article move == | |||
| You unilaterally, without any discussion, moved ] to ], with a note that "there was no Arabization". Huh? Half the vocabulary of modern Persian comes from Arabic and there's no Arabization? Furthermore, the article, as it stood, pointed out that the Persians HAD resisted the extreme Arabization that occurred in other countries. The two notions, of Arabization and Islamicization, are usually discussed together by academics. | |||
| You acted against Wikiquette, for POV motives. Please undo your move. ] 12:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : This is the note I wrote, the last part of it is missing due to edit summery limit: The term "Arabization" in the title implies that there was a successful "Arabization" process of Persia and Iran which is not true. According to Professor Bernard Lewis , "Iran was indeed Islamized, but it was not Arabized. Persians remained Persians." --] 07:40, 24 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: By the way, your assertion that "Half the vocabulary of modern Persian comes from Arabic" is totally inaccurate and false. --] 07:46, 24 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Arabization of Iran== | |||
| Generally speaking commenting on other people's messages on private discussion pages is not a good idea. But you're right this is not a good title. Maybe it should be ] or ]? It depends on what kind of sources ] has, so just remain cool until she responds to what I posted on her page. ]<sup>]/]</sup> 13:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : 1) The term "Arabization" is defined as "To make Arabic" and hence inappropriate for the title of any such articles. Even the Persian script, which is based on Arabic, is still different from Arabic. --] 13:41, 24 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::You have a better name for it? ]]]<sup>]</sup> 14:16, 24 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Well, I don't know, and I don't care. What I know, and what I care, is that the term "Arabization" is misleading and inappropriate in such context as it largely means "To become Arab" or "To make Arabic". --] 16:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == IM == | |||
| I'll get on later today, I gotta go right now. --] 19:24, 24 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Hi there == | |||
| Can I have your e-mail address please? --] 01:04, 25 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :You can email me by clicking the @ link on my signature. --<small>]<sup>]|]</sup></small> 01:07, 25 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: I tried, but the @ link on your signature doesn't work. --] 01:09, 25 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::: This is the message I get "This user has not specified a valid e-mail address, or has chosen not to receive e-mail from other users." --] 01:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Try again. Sorry there was a minor issue I had to fix. --<small>]<sup>]|]</sup></small> 01:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Stop your nonsense == | |||
| A Muslim cannot practice Astrology = he was not Muslim.--] 18:26, 25 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR violation at ] == | |||
| Hi, you violated the ] on ]. I have disabled your editing permissions for 24 hours. Please read our guide on ] during the time you are unable to contribute to Misplaced Pages. Feel free to return after your block expires, but take your differences to the talk page and please refrain from edit warring. Cheers, —'']'' 13:22, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : I've never broken 3RR before and as I fully explained my fourth edit on ''Iranian peoples'' was simply to counter, what appeared to me as simple vandalism, since the user was adding '''an excessive number of irrelevant tags''' to the article , disrupting Misplaced Pages to make a point (]). I accept your decision, but I'd appreciate if you could re-examine the decision considering the circumstances surrounding my fourth edit, and the fact that I've never broken 3RR in the past. --] 13:29, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Looking at the discussion there, I've got to say that the fourth one '''is''' a revert, not the removal of ].] 13:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Hi Eli Falk, are you an administrator? --] 14:04, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::No, but since I thought you should get an answer to your request, and the administrators have not been keeping up with things, I decided to answer you myself.] 14:12, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: Thanks the explanation. As for your original comment, I was under the impression that I was revering simple vandalism as ] states that "'''Do not place dispute tags improperly'''". --] 14:19, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::: Since the question of when tags are proper isn't simple, reverts on those grounds aren't reverts of simple vandalism. If a user had been placing dispute tags on random articles, then you would have a claim here; since he only put them on '''this''' article, things aren't simple.] 14:25, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::: looked like vandalism to me. Simultaneously adding an absurd number of tags on to an article, just for the sake of doing it and disfiguring the article, looked like vandalism to me. --] 14:40, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::There is a difference between '''looks like vandalism to me''' and '''simple vandalism'''. I'm not saying it '''wasn't''' vandalism, just that it '''may''' not be vandalism. I understand that you think it to be vandalism; however, there is the possibility for a revert war to start, in which each side claims that they're reverting vandalism. For this reason, the rule says it doesn't apply to '''simple''' vandsalism.] 14:53, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : I know what you are saying, but if you have any doubts that the edit in question is simple vandalism, then please take another look at and how the third and fourth tags (''The factual accuracy'' and ''The neutrality'') are actually a repetition of the first tag. (''The neutrality and factual accuracy''). --] 15:02, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::So what you should have done, in that case, is remove the first, leave the other three, and in the "Edit Summary" wrote that it is just a repeat of the third and fourth.] 15:06, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::: In retrospect, perhaps I should have, but the edit was vandalism as far as I could see, so I simply reverted it. Regardless, I accept ]'s decision but I'd appreciate it if he could reconsider the decision since I have no prior history of 3RR violations. --] 15:15, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I left him a message on his talk page. If he happens to show up at Misplaced Pages before your block time is over, he will see that.] 15:22, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: Thanks, but the message you left on ]'s talk page, is not about me. I think you mistook me for someone else. --] 15:38, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Yes, adding the tags was (in my opinion) a violation of ]. No, it was not simple vandalism. Considering how hard it is to violate 3RR when more than three editros are involved and taking into account the 4 or 5 people did I think it is best if everybody takes a timeout today. Also, if I would be lenient to ManiF I should be to Aucuman as well as removing disputed tags is far from encouraged and he therefore had soem right in placing them back. Of course, these are all rather subjective criteria which really shouldn't be taken into account when blocking someone for violation 3RR. —'']'' 16:00, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Source== | |||
| Amir, Kash, SC, ManiF, | |||
| I have access to an online e-book library. It has some of the books that are listed as reference on Iranian related pages. If any of you are interested, email me, I'll hook you up with the password and all.--] 02:27, 30 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Khomeini== | |||
| Please see ] - I'd like to see that all my hard work in keeping that article NPOV not go down the drain because of other peoples' POV. For example, the issue of "Imam." This is getting tiresome. ] 03:09, 31 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Persian Gulf == | |||
| Just thought I should note that you are awful close to violating the ] on ]. However, I will not be reverting it back until we can work things out on ]. Thanks — ]] 05:38, 31 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Rollback== | |||
| What specific Misplaced Pages policy are you referring to? ]]]<sup>]</sup> 05:39, 31 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Persian Gulf == | |||
| Just so you know, you are close to violating the ] on ]. | |||
| == Hello == | |||
| Hey ManiF, Thanks for the link. I have had a long discussion with Pecher regarding many issues with the article ]. There is a mediation going on for the dhimmi article (see the talk page of the article). Among the issues we discussed, for example, I provided evidences for him that current shia scholars such as Fazel Lankarani do not deem people of the book to be najis, but he seems to be unwilling to accept it. I am frustrated. Shad bashi, --] 08:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Have you seen , your name is there? --] 06:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you for letting me know. --<small>]<sup>]|]</sup></small> 09:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Inuse == | |||
| I'm sorry but I believe you have somwhat misunderstood the point of the inuse tag.- ] | ] 12:49, 31 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == I hate MSMSNMSNGR == | |||
| Dorod! | |||
| Man az Micy badam miad bia to yahoo : Iranssn < id man | |||
| == Huh? == | |||
| What are you so happy about? :) --] 18:28, 31 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I can't right now - I'm on a different comp. --] 19:03, 31 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Geber == | |||
| My mistake, reverted to the wrong one I think --] 17:36, 1 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Fazel Lankarani == | |||
| It is sad to see that Pecher asks you again about the source while I have already shown one to him in the mediation page of the "Dhimmi" article. Yes, Here you are: . This is the official website of Lankarani. Pecher already knows about this: Regarding the opinion of other scholars, please read my discussion with Pecher on the mediation page (that was how the discussion proceeded.) | |||
| Also you can have a look at : | |||
| Thanks, | |||
| Aminz. | |||
| == Lewis == | |||
| I'm not sure what the conflict is about, but how do you know he doesn't mention him there? Do you have the book? ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 19:09, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm baffled here, ManiF. I've looked at the book, and it does indeed say exactly what they claim, on page 34. Where on Google book were you looking? ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 19:24, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Here's a link. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 19:31, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm still not understanding. Lewis specifically refers to "non-Muslims" on that page, and how their secretions become "ritually clean" upon conversion. Why would other opinions be relevant to deleting that information? ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 19:41, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :As you see on the page, Lewis specifically use the term "Non-Muslims", referring to Khomeini's views. Are you saying that you believe Lewis to be incorrect? ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 19:49, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :O.K., I still don't understand. ''Who'' is being "misleading", and ''who'' is accusing them of being misleading? If you answer those questions, maybe I'll get it. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 19:57, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh, and regarding your last statement, would ] demand that all different views on this be heard? Specifically, ''The neutral point of view is a means of dealing with conflicting views. The policy requires that, where there are or have been conflicting views, these are fairly presented, but not asserted. All significant points of view are presented, not just the most popular one. It is not asserted that the most popular view or some sort of intermediate view among the different views is the correct one. Readers are left to form their own opinions.''? ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 20:00, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Msn Id or AOL id== | |||
| no I do not.--] 03:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Neither, only wikipedia talk page.--] 04:03, 3 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Moshe == | |||
| No, what are they?- ] | ] 04:56, 3 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Shirazi== | |||
| My great Grandfather dar haqiqat was the uncle of Ayatollah Shirazi, who was called "Seyd Mammad Taher", (also a Marja, who was sent into exile and imprisoned). The only thing I have from him and Ayatollah Shirazi are some old pictures, a bunch of newspaper clips, and the personal angoshtar aqeeq of "Seyd Mammad Taher", which somehow miraculously got passed on to me (instead of one of the other 40 pesar khalehs I have), and which must be around 100 years old I'm thinking. | |||
| I know nothing of his beliefs. Everything I do know is from what I've heard from my grandma. And I only visit their (the ayatollah Shirazi) residence once every 3 years or so.--] 20:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == My RfA == | |||
| {| cellpadding=6 style="border: black 1px solid; background-color: orange" | |||
| |- | |||
| | ] | |||
| | Hi ManiF. Just a quick note to thank you for your support in ], which recently passed '''62/13/6'''. I will do my very best live up to this new responsibility and to serve the community, but please ] if I make any mistakes or if you have any feedback at all on my actions. Finally, if there is anything that I can assist you with - please don't hesitate to ask. Cheers ] 03:55, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == Sorry == | |||
| I'm busy, be back later. --] 04:14, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == RFC Xebat (Diyako) == | |||
| Regarding your ], that user has been blocked for 1 month because of blatant personal attacks ,, perhaps the issue can be taken to the ArbCom for arbitration now. --] 13:19, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Why am I not suprised. It is possible to file a case on arbcom against Diyako but he would be unblocked as soon as arbitration starts. | |||
| :It might be in the best interest of Diyako as well as all of us to wait a month before we put this to arbitration. Let everything cool a bit perhaps. | |||
| :--<small>]<sup>]|]</sup></small> 13:25, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Thanks for reporting this user's behavior, disruption of that kind is blatantly unacceptable. I've given him a final warning, and if he continues trying to incite some sort of 'rebellion', he will be blocked for trolling. --] 18:59, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Yeah == | |||
| I just got here. --] 00:03, 5 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Hi == | |||
| Are you an adminstrator? --] 08:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : No, not at the moment, although that might change in a few days — my candidacy is currently being discussed at ]/]. What's on your mind? ] 08:17, 6 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Questions? == | |||
| Just out of curiosity, did you have any specific question you wanted to ask me when you contacted me the other day? ] <small><sup>]|]</sup></small> 08:59, 6 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Richard Nelson Frye == | |||
| I revised the article, put an explanation in talk -- and you immediately reverted, saying, "Use talk". That is just plain wrong and misleading. I did use talk. I don't have to get YOUR permission before making edits. ] 08:20, 7 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Messenger == | |||
| No — just e-mail and my Talk page. --] (]) 17:31, 7 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:44, 26 November 2023
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. ManiF has not edited Misplaced Pages since 5 December 2006. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
 | User:ManiF is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
addLoadEvent
Hi, one of your user scripts uses the addLoadEvent( func ) function (see ). This function will be removed from MediaWiki:Common.js soon. Please modify your scripts to use addOnloadHook( func ) instead. —Ruud 18:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
mistakes
Salam(dorud).
I found some mistakes in Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Iran.
There is a template which said "User Sassanid" but shows map of the Achaemenid . So I suggest to change the picture or name of it. Please don't tell me it's not an article so it can be wrong. Ufrate(forat) was the western border of sassanid's territory most of the time.
- 2-Timeline of Dynasties of Iran: There was some semi-independent government in Iran between Tahirids and Mongols which are called estila(with sword) and estekfa(with permition). They have dependent autority but they didn't have legitimacy without permittion of kalif, although kalif was under their domination during buwayhids and siljukids. I suggest to use different colors to show different type of government. Also from Timurids to Safavids there were mulukattavayefi and there might be more than 5 government in one time. --Sa.vakilian 03:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Two Articles in need of your attention
There are two entries at Misplaced Pages, which have falsely created -- they are Turco-Persian and Turko-Persian Tradition. Both entries are factitious. I have requested the entries to be deleted. My reasons are:
- The term Turko-Persian Tradition (or Turco-Persian) does not exists academically and it is a factitious entry! Check the Encyclopaedia Iranica to confirm -- The correct name for that culture is the Persianate culture not the "Turko-Persian". Turkophones (mostly of mixed race and Persianized in culture) only spoke in Turkic dialects and were in the military. That is not enough participation in creating and forming the culture to deserve the name "Turko-Persian Tradition" – This is misinformation. All the elements in that area, which have to do with tradition and culture, were drawn from the Iranian culture and the Islamic faith, not much Turkic elements (like shamanism, yurts etc.) were incorporated in. That is what makes the name "Turko-Persian" an imaginary one and therefore the entry should be deleted.
Any contributions would greatly appreciated. Bā Sepās Surena 02:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Turkish Kurdistan
Ben bu madde hakkında adminlere bir şikayette bulunmayı düşünüyorum bu maddenin adının doğruluğundan şüpheli olan herkesin şikayet etmesinin daha etkili olacağını düşünüyorum bunun için yardım etmek isterseniz cevabınızı bekliyorumOnurRC
AfD
Hi ManiF, this is a message I'm posting to everyone who participated in this AfD. I have nominated the same article for deletion again here – you might be interested. Regards, KissL 09:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)