| Revision as of 22:47, 8 February 2012 editModernist (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers106,214 edits WARNING← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:24, 4 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been ]. Please make use of the ] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> {{welcome}} <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000066; background-color:#DDEEFF; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| <div style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; width: 132px;"> | |||
| ] Wikipedians also recommend ] with tea. | |||
| </div> | |||
| == February 2012 == | |||
| ''] <sup>'''<span style='color:#800080;'>(</span>'''] ¦ ]'''<span style='color:#800080;'>)</span>'''</sup>'' has given you ]. Tea promotes ] and hopefully this has made your day ever so slightly better. ] | |||
| ] Constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article ] has an ] that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use ] for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-wrongsummary --> ]] 11:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I thought you were retiring... ]] 11:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-delete4 --><p>Do not delete sourced information with a discussion and a consensus to do so. ] (]) 12:37, 9 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Fair warning == | |||
| Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a tea, especially if it is someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy! <br /> | |||
| You can erase all the comment you want on your talk page but the history is still visible and you are on your third level warning for disruptive editing. You are heading towards a block for being disruptive, edit warring and ] edits. Also, accusing other editors of vandalism when no such thing has taken place violates ]. ]] 11:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Spread the lovely, warm, refreshing goodness of tea by adding {{tls|wikitea}} to their talk page with a friendly message. | |||
| :Numerous editors have now told you, via templated warnings, that your edits are disagreed with, and yet you have said nothing in response except via edit summary, and you have reverted all their edits without prior discussion. Edit summary remarks are not sufficient. Please respond '''''here''''', on this page, to justify your removal of descriptive lanaguage, in some cases sourced and cited, from lede sentences, and explain why you have reverted their edits. ] (]) 13:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| </div><!-- Template:wikitea --> --''] <sup>'''<span style='color:#800080;'>(</span>'''] ¦ ]'''<span style='color:#800080;'>)</span>'''</sup>'' 13:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== AN/I == | ||
| on WP:AN/I concerns you. Please feel free to comment there. ] (]) 04:24, 10 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I notice you have not made any further edits since receiving the final warning above from ]. That's good as I would have agreed with a block and enacted one myself if you had made further edits without discussion. Misplaced Pages is a collaboration, and that means you can't simply work alone; you have to respond to people either on your own talk page, on theirs, or at articles. Not doing so is disruptive, especially if what you are doing causes people to raise objections. YOU may feel the objections are spurious but you still have to reply to them. | |||
| :If you make further edits to articles without discussing them on an appropriate talk page when requested, I will block you temporarily. If you delete this message I will assume you have read and understood it, but a positive message from you here to that effect would be better. ] ] 13:18, 10 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <div style=clear: both></div>] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ] with <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Your edits appear to constitute ] and have been ] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-2 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning2 -->''']]''' 20:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Edit Warring== | |||
| {{{icon|]}}} Your recent editing history {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{1|}}}|at ]|}} shows that you are in danger of breaking the ], or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. '''Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a ].''' | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. You may still be blocked for ] even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{2|}}}|{{Break}}{{{2}}}|}}...] (]) 22:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692239519 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 00:24, 4 March 2023
February 2012
Constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Brad Bird has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. freshacconci talktalk 11:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- I thought you were retiring... freshacconci talktalk 11:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Misplaced Pages, as you did at Cass Gilbert, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Do not delete sourced information with a discussion and a consensus to do so. Beyond My Ken (talk) 12:37, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Fair warning
You can erase all the comment you want on your talk page but the history is still visible and you are on your third level warning for disruptive editing. You are heading towards a block for being disruptive, edit warring and pointy edits. Also, accusing other editors of vandalism when no such thing has taken place violates WP:CIVIL. freshacconci talktalk 11:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Numerous editors have now told you, via templated warnings, that your edits are disagreed with, and yet you have said nothing in response except via edit summary, and you have reverted all their edits without prior discussion. Edit summary remarks are not sufficient. Please respond here, on this page, to justify your removal of descriptive lanaguage, in some cases sourced and cited, from lede sentences, and explain why you have reverted their edits. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
AN/I
This discussion on WP:AN/I concerns you. Please feel free to comment there. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:24, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- I notice you have not made any further edits since receiving the final warning above from Beyond My Ken. That's good as I would have agreed with a block and enacted one myself if you had made further edits without discussion. Misplaced Pages is a collaboration, and that means you can't simply work alone; you have to respond to people either on your own talk page, on theirs, or at articles. Not doing so is disruptive, especially if what you are doing causes people to raise objections. YOU may feel the objections are spurious but you still have to reply to them.
- If you make further edits to articles without discussing them on an appropriate talk page when requested, I will block you temporarily. If you delete this message I will assume you have read and understood it, but a positive message from you here to that effect would be better. Kim Dent-Brown 13:18, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)