| Revision as of 06:06, 22 February 2012 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,993 editsm Signing comment by KMuuli - "→Please explain: "← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 16:42, 1 August 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,091 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Barek/Archive 2024) (botTag: Manual revert |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{not around|3=24 April 2021}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = __NOEDITSECTION__ {{User:Barek/archive notices}}{{usertalkpage}}{{User:Barek/archives}}__TOC__ |
|
|archiveheader = __NOEDITSECTION__ {{User:Barek/archive notices}}{{usertalkpage}}{{User:Barek/archives}}__TOC__ |
|
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 2 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|algo = old(8d) |
|
|algo = old(14d) |
|
|archive = User talk:Barek/Archive %(year)d |
|
|archive = User talk:Barek/Archive %(year)d |
|
⚫ |
}}{{User:Barek/talk notices}}{{User:Barek/archives}}__TOC__ |
|
}}{{bots|deny=DASHBot}} |
|
| ⚫ |
{{User:Barek/talk notices}}{{usertalkpage|background=#f9f9f9|border-c=#aaa}}<br/>{{User:Barek/archives}}__TOC__ |
|
|
|
|
|
== Blu-ray == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{blurayi}} |
|
|
] ] 19:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Wooktook == |
|
|
|
|
|
This guy's just messing around. Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia.] ] 06:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Commission breakthrough spam == |
|
|
|
|
|
Gdaay Barek. Spam like DJalses's where it was ...knowledgenow.com, and variations of ...now.com is all part of the spam that Beetstra's {{user|XLinkBot}} and {{user|COIBot}} is battling, and with Beetstra and I feeding it more and more data as we analyse this shite. If you start to see further patterns, have a look at some of the data in ] and see what else might match. To note that Beetstra and I have been also working on this at ]. — ] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">]</span>'' 02:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Please explain == |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm writing to figure out what was so bothersome about my edit of Nordic Walking. What instances were promotional and what where unsourced, because you reverted my edit back to FALSE information. Read through the history (of my edit) compare it to this one and contact me ASAP. The whole claim that "Nordic walking is defined as fitness walking with specially designed poles. It developed from an off-season ski-training activity known as ski walking, hill bounding or ski striding to become a way of exercising year-round. Ski walking and hill bounding with poles has been practiced for decades as dry land training for competitive Nordic skiers. Ski coaches saw the success of world class cross country skiers who used ski poles in the summer for ski walking and hill bounding and it became a staple of off-season Nordic ski training." is utterly false as there is concrete evidence that tells otherwise. Carefully read through the edit and instead of bluntly reverting it FIX IT to a more fitting state. The information provided is sufficient and sourced (if not tell me exactly what isn't). Further I can provide more sources to those health benefits, but they are benefits of Nordic Walking, not Exerstriding. Exerstriding and Nordic Walking are NOT the same thing. |
|
|
] (]) 07:51, 21 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:I'm only able to view and edit by phone at the moment; I'll re-review and respond more fully when I'm back to my regular computer (hopefully this evening). --- ] <small>(])</small> - 18:52, 21 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::Again I need to point out Barek, that you are very fast to take action against, but not for the improvement of the article. And that is deeply discouraging. When will I get an answer, since Natashadashenko is clearly interested only in reverting it (no answers thus far). Also when will a discussion start? When can I get in contact with a "competent" individual to finally correct the article into a fitting state for the public. Because it is bothersome also, that thus long it is still showing wrong information (in all honesty I'd completely remove the page from prying eyes until it can be fixed). <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
