| Revision as of 21:36, 2 April 2012 editAcroterion (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators232,795 edits →Reliable sources: warni9ng← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 07:04, 21 October 2023 edit undoDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers235,997 edits not around since May 2017 |
| (654 intermediate revisions by 48 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{not around|3=17 May 2017}} |
|
== January 2012 == |
|
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
] Your addition to ] has been removed, as it appears to have added ] material to Misplaced Pages without ] from the copyright holder. For ], we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''article content'' such as sentences or images. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be ]'''. <!-- Template:uw-copyright --> ''Please do not copy text straight from a book source, in this case page 167 from ''How to Lose a War: More Foolish Plans and Great Military Blunders'' by Bill Fawcett.'' ] (]) 23:03, 7 January 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 70K |
|
|
|counter = 6 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
|algo = old(31d) |
|
|
|archive = User talk:Rwenonah/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} |
|
|
{{Archive box | style= CSS values |] ]}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Asymmetric warfare and the Vietnam War == |
|
== Re:War of 1812 (United States Expansionism) == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{talkback|Talk:Asymmetric_warfare#Vietnam_War}} |
|
You wrote on my user talk page, |
|
|
<blockquote> |
|
|
I think that it was wrong to revert my edit. It is irrelevant how the author mentions the information as long as it doesn't violate copyrights,is from a reputable source, and supports the edit.As for the irrelevance of the Revoloutionary War, there is another sentence about the same treaty in the British Support For Indian Wars section,but no one appears to be attacking that.</blockquote> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ''The Bugle'': Issue 208, August 2023 == |
|
As ] (]), you spent many years attempting to insert a minority view about U.S. expansionism into the article, being barred twice for edit warring for your pains. This latest insertion appears to me to be a rather desperate attempt at source-shopping to support your ]. The cite is to a single throwaway sentence in a thirty-page dissertation about a different subject entirely. It therefore does not count as a ] when compared to works which focus on the subject in question. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="width: 100%;" |
|
You have inserted a sentence which flatly contradicts the preceding paragraph, based on your one tangential source. The sentence about the Revolutionary War is a complete ''non sequitur'', irrelevant to the section. In short, your addition does not add to the article, and detracts from it by inserting confusing and poorly-sourced views. It will therefore be removed again. If you choose to edit-war on the matter, I will first submit a ] by other interested editors. If the concensus of opinion is against you, I will not hesitate to take the matter to the administrators, as I feel that over the years your edits on this subject have been generally disruptive.] (]) 14:32, 8 January 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | |
|
|
{| |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div> |
|
|
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> |
|
|
* Project news: '']'' |
|
|
* Articles: '']'' |
|
|
* Book review: '']'' |
|
|
* Op-ed: '']'' |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|} |
|
|
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;"> |
|
|
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 11:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1166489155 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ''The Bugle'': Issue 209, September 2023 == |
|
:You wrote further on my talk page: |
|
|
<blockquote> |
|
|
Sorry about my change of user name, I forgot my password. However, I think that it doesn't matter how something is mentioned in a book, as long as it is there and is by a reputable source. As for the consenus, I would not trust those results.This ongoing expansionism arguement is essentially a difference between American and Canadian/British viewpoints on the war. The Canadian/British viewpoint is that the U.S wanted to annex Canada.I think that this viewpoint deserves representation. But since the Canadian population is smaller then the population of the American state of California, there are many more American editors willing to support the American viewpoint then there are Canadian/british editors willing to do the opposite(this is reflected on the page). In addition, I once angered a number of editors by putting in a page reference from the wrong book, which they took as a lie and attempt to add a POV. Another time, I accidentally violated 3RR( I didn't know about the rule). Thus, I would not trust a consensus as impartial or accurate. My view is only a minority view inside the US. In Canada/Britain it is certainly a majority view. If you would like to edit an encyclopedia oriented toward the United States, I believe there is a website called "Conservapedia" which has an American flag on the main page.</blockquote> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="width: 100%;" |
|
:For your information, I am a British editor. I do not accept that ], alias "viewpoints" should dictate the content of articles. The only viewpoints which should be included are those which match the Misplaced Pages fundamental principles: ], ], ] and ]. I have contributed extensively to articles on the War of 1812. I hope I have written as neutrally and dispassionately on British triumphs as on British blunders or disasters.] (]) 20:14, 8 January 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | |
|
|
{| |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div> |
|
|
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> |
|
|
* Project news: '']'' |
|
|
* Articles: '']'' |
|
|
* Book review: '']'' |
|
|
* Op-ed: '']'' |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|} |
|
|
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;"> |
|
|
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 21:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1174199736 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ''The Bugle'': Issue 210, October 2023 == |
|
== War of 1812 == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="width: 100%;" |
|
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are in danger of breaking the ], or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. '''Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a ].''' |
|
|
|
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | |
|
|
|
|
|
{| |
|
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. You may still be blocked for ] even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 19:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| ] |
|
|
|
|
|
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div> |
|
Also, you are not supposed to set up multiple accounts. Please see the SPI report. ] (]) 20:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> |
|
There is no doubt that catholic and French Lower Canada (Quebec) would not have been welcomed by many in the US nor would the addition of Florida have offset the addition of British North America in the mind's of many in the south but there is still more to the debate. J. C. A. Stagg whose writing is used in the article to deny that the US declared war to annex Canada states: "Yet there can be little doubt that, had the War of 1812 been a successful military venture, the Madison administration would have been reluctant to have returned occupied Canadian territory to the enemy." That is from his book Mr. Madison's War on page 4. |
|
|
|
* Project news: '']'' |
|
|
|
|
|
* Articles: '']'' |
|
== Stagg's comment == |
|
|
|
* Book review: '']'' |
|
|
|
|
|
</div> |
|
I am going to put the quote from Stagg on the article page. You put it on your own talk page so you know it is accurate. Now the readers can read exactly what Stagg said and come to their own conclusion. Also, you removed other editors' comments from the War of 1812 talk page and that is not something you should do. Another editor has added them back. ] (]) 23:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|- |
|
|
|
|
|
|} |
|
==April 2012== |
|
|
|
|} |
|
==Welcome!== |
|
|
|
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;"> |
|
|
|
|
|
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 19:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
Hello, Rwenonah, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: |
|
|
|
</div> |
|
*] |
|
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1175234447 --> |
|
*] |
|
|
*] and ] |
|
|
*] (using the ] if you wish) |
|
|
*] |
|
|
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] your messages on ]s using four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place <code><nowiki>{{help me}}</nowiki></code> before the question. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">] (])</span> 15:33, 1 April 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Reliable sources == |
|
|
|
|
|
Please see ]. The website that you are trying to proffer as one isn't. Thank you,<br/><span style="text-shadow:#294 0.1em 0.1em 0.3em; class=texhtml">]</span> 21:14, 2 April 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
] Please stop your ]. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's ] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> '''<font face="Arial">] <small>]</small></font>''' 21:34, 2 April 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:You appear to be soapboxing against hunting, using inappropriate sources: pleasebekind.org isn't a satisfactory source, and you have no consensus to make these changes. Please stop edit-warring. '''<font face="Arial">] <small>]</small></font>''' 21:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC) |
|
