| Revision as of 12:42, 22 April 2012 editAnAimlessRoad (talk | contribs)64 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 17:03, 22 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,616,902 edits Reminder of an inactive anchor: Gentile#Antigentilism |
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{oldafdfull| date = 1 May 2012 | result = '''redirect to ]''' | page = Antigentilism }} |
|
{{talkheader}} |
|
|
|
{{Broken anchors|links= |
|
{{WikiProject Psychology}} |
|
|
|
* <nowiki>]</nowiki> The anchor (Antigentilism) ]. <!-- {"title":"Antigentilism","appear":{"revid":831975210,"parentid":831380411,"timestamp":"2018-03-23T02:33:01Z","removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":},"disappear":{"revid":993827447,"parentid":993660359,"timestamp":"2020-12-12T18:21:57Z","removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":}} --> |
|
{{WikiProject Discrimination}} |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
== Farse == |
|
|
|
|
|
This article is a pure farse. I think one could hardly find a single more biased article in the whole wiki. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 11:52, 6 March 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Nice Propaganda == |
|
|
|
|
|
"Antigentilism is a form of xenophobia which may occur as one response to long Jewish experience of Gentile antisemitism." |
|
|
|
|
|
This is a false statement and is not verifiable. How do you verify that "antigentilism" only arises as a direct response to "antisemitism"? Following the same logic, one could assert that antisemitism arises in response to Jewish ethnocentrism. There may be some truth to both assertions but it's far more complicated and multi-dimensional than that. |
|
|
|
|
|
"Some white nationalists have discerned Anti-Christian sentiment in the Talmud." |
|
|
|
|
|
Another false statement. Emphasising the term "white nationalist" implies that these criticisms arise solely from the white-nationalist community, which is patently false, since Louis Farrakhan for example is not a white nationalist, last I checked. It also insinuates a racist origin for such criticisms (how can it be racist to merely perceive anti-christian sentiment in a book)? |
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, nice propaganda and all, but this article needs more balance. |
|
