Revision as of 18:44, 2 May 2012 editGuy Macon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,290 edits →Not even remotely fair.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:11, 27 November 2024 edit undoWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,137 edits rv old notice Undid revision 1258260759 by MediaWiki message delivery (talk)Tags: Replaced Undo | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Get rid of the banner == | |||
⚫ | |||
..again. | |||
⚫ | Does this get rid of the banner? --] (]) 22:26, 20 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
== Not even remotely fair. == | |||
Your listing of a simple typo that was quickly corrected as if it was a major error<br /> | |||
(See https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User%3AWtshymanski%2FGriping&diff=490185155&oldid=489153153)<br /> | |||
is unfair and offensive. Have you never hit the 9 key when you meant to hit the 0 key? I am asking you nicely to please remove the entry. --] (]) 21:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Why? It's on the record and it's amusing. It also serves as a reminded that we look foolish in arguments. Hardly offensive if it's true. --] (]) 21:42, 1 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
::I don't mind looking foolish when I have actually been foolish. This was just a slip of the finger. It is ''not'' true that a simple typo belongs on your list of boneheaded statements. It should be reserved for people who actually believe the misconceptions you imply that they believe. --] (]) 21:55, 1 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::It's been a while and I haven't looked back into this particular teapot, but I think the reason it made the list was the *insistence* that a chip had 49 pins instead of 40. It was more than a one-shot typo. Plus when you're being swarmed in the schoolyard sometimes pointing out a bully's untied shoelace is all you've got. --] (]) 13:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::'''Evidence, please.''' | |||
::::Typo made here: | |||
::::. | |||
::::Typo corrected here: | |||
::::. | |||
::::So where is the diff showing where I allegedly "insisted" that a 8748 microcontroller has 49 pins instead of 40? (sound of crickets...) | |||
::::BTW, it is hardly "bullying" to respond to your lack of knowledge concerning ], ], and the number of ] pins needed for each, and it is hardly "being swarmed" when multiple engineers and computer scientists attempt to correct your ignorance before you harm the article further. --] (]) 18:05, 2 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
{{outdent}} yes, Guy. --] (]) 18:20, 2 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
:So, are you retracting your false "''the reason it made the list was the *insistence* that a chip had 49 pins instead of 40. It was more than a one-shot typo.''" claim? If so, this would be a good time to offer up a sincere (as in "not sarcastic or backhanded") apology. If not, please provide evidence that your claim is true. --] (]) 18:30, 2 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
::OK Guy... What happened, did you and Andy decide to switch roles thsi week? He's been positively cuddly compared to his usual behaviour, where as I'm beginning to sense a certain strain in our previously cordial relations. Last month it was the other way around. What fun. --] (]) 18:33, 2 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::Answer the question, please. You said something about me that is untrue and which I found to be insulting. I deserve a retraction and apology instead of sarcastic edit comments about my supposed sexual orientation. | |||
:::As for being cordial, if being cordial will prevent your ongoing harm to the encyclopedia, I will be cordial. If being aggressive will prevent your ongoing harm to the encyclopedia, I will be aggressive (within policy). --] (]) 18:44, 2 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 11:09, 2 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
== NACA reports == | |||
] | |||
This should be discussed centrally, once and for all. ] (]) 15:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 03:11, 27 November 2024
Get rid of the banner
Does this get rid of the banner? --Wtshymanski (talk) 22:26, 20 August 2024 (UTC)