Revision as of 05:19, 10 May 2012 editAndyTheGrump (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers54,017 edits →Article moved: Sceptre, fuck off and troll elsewhere.← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 19:30, 3 January 2025 edit undoSpookyaki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,824 edits Assessment: banner shell, Biography, Freedom of speech (Low), Human rights (High), Gender studies (Low), Law (Low), Military history (Rater) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{GA nominee|04:43, 4 April 2012 (UTC)|nominator=] <small><sup>]</sup></small>|page=2|subtopic=Politics and government|status=onreview|note=}} |
|
|
|
{{Talk header|search=no|bottom=yes|noarchives=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell |
|
|
|
{{FAQ|collapsed=no}} |
|
|1={{WPBiography|living=yes|class=C|military-priority=Low|military-work-group=yes|listas=Manning, Bradley}} |
|
|
|
{{Round in circles|topic=article name and gender|search=no}} |
|
{{WPMILHIST|class=B|Middle-Eastern=yes|US=yes|importance=Mid| B1 <!-- Referencing and citations --> = y |
|
|
|
{{Notice|Editor behavior around the article title discussion was brought to Misplaced Pages's ]:<br /> |
|
| B2 <!-- Coverage and accuracy --> = y |
|
|
|
*] |
|
| B3 <!-- Structure --> = y |
|
|
|
}} |
|
| B4 <!-- Grammar and style --> = y |
|
|
|
{{MOS-TW}} |
|
| B5 <!-- Supporting materials --> = y}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|collapsed=yes|blp=activepol|vital=yes|listas=Manning, Chelsea|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Journalism|importance=Mid|class=C}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|military-work-group=yes|military-priority=Mid|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=Low}} |
|
{{LGBTProject|class=C}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Oklahoma|class=C|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Freedom of speech|importance=Low}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Human rights|importance=High}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Gender studies |importance=Low}} |
|
|maxarchivesize = 400K |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Journalism|importance=Mid}} |
|
|counter = 3 |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Law|importance=Low}} |
|
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies|person=yes}} |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Media|importance=high}} |
|
|algo = old(14d) |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Military history|class=GA|Biography=yes|US=yes|Post-Cold-War=yes}} |
|
|archive = Talk:Bradley Manning/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Oklahoma|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Women}} |
|
|
{{Wiki Loves Pride talk|2017}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{Banner holder|collapsed=yes|1= |
|
|blp=yes |
|
|
|
{{Misplaced Pages:Featured article tools|1=Chelsea Manning}} |
|
|
{{Connected contributor|User1=Adrian~enwiki|U1-declared=yes|U1-EH=yes|User2=Brian Manning|U2-declared=yes|U2-EH=yes}} |
|
|
{{Article history |
|
|
|action1=GAN |
|
|
|action1date=05:58, 11 May 2012 |
|
|
|action1link=Talk:Chelsea Manning/GA2 |
|
|
|action1result=listed |
|
|
|action1oldid=491886566 |
|
|
|action2=GAR |
|
|
|action2date=16:24, 23 August 2013 |
|
|
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Chelsea Manning/1 |
|
|
|action2result=Kept |
|
|
|action2oldid=569874529 |
|
|
|currentstatus=GA |
|
|
|topic=socsci |
|
|
|otd1date=2019-02-18|otd1oldid=883922681 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{Press|collapsed=yes |
|
{{archives|auto=yes|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot|age=14|index=/Archive index| |
|
|
|
|title=Misplaced Pages Beats Major News Organizations, Perfectly Reflects Chelsea Manning's New Gender |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|author=Mark Joseph Stern |
|
{{Misplaced Pages:Featured article tools|1=Bradley Manning}} |
|
|
|
|date=August 22, 2013 |
|
|
|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/08/22/chelsea_manning_wikipedia_perfectly_reflects_new_gender_of_whistleblower.html |
|
|
|org=] |
|
|
|accessdate=August 22, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|title2=Bradley Manning wants to live as a woman named Chelsea Manning |
|
== Censoring Mitnick == |
|
|
|
|url2=http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-bradley-manning-woman-chelsea-manning-20130822,0,7620376.story#ixzz2lg3aFF6G |
|
|
|date2=August 22, 2013 |
|
|
|author2=Robin Abcarian |
|
|
|accessdate2=August 23, 2013 |
|
|
|org2=] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|title3=Misplaced Pages Changed Its Entry To Properly Reflect Chelsea Manning's Name |
|
], a world famous hacker, used? ]] |
|
|
|
|author3=Justine Sharrock |
|
|
|date3=August 22, 2013 |
|
|
|url3=http://www.buzzfeed.com/justinesharrock/wikipedia-changed-its-entry-to-properly-reflect-chelsea-mann |
|
|
|org3=] |
|
|
|accessdate3=August 23, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|url4=http://www.usnews.com/news/newsgram/articles/2013/08/22/bradley-manning-real-me-is-a-woman-named-chelsea |
|
===<s>Above<s> picture (added by ])=== |
|
|
|
|title4=Bradley Manning: 'Real Me' Is a Woman Named Chelsea |
|
<s>This image has a caption which is not visible. It reads "Why isn't this image with ], a world famous hacker, used?"<s> I did not post the image, but clarification is needed. <s>Also, the picture should be downsized or removed. (How it helps in the discussion to improve the article escapes me.)<s> --] (]) 15:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC) Add strikeout as image size and caption has been resolved, and reference to earlier discussion is cited. My concern was the bare posting of the huge image, without supporting discussion. Rather than refactoring the edit, I added the comment and asked Esemono to clarify.18:30, 25 April 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|author4=Steven Nelson |
|
|
|date4=August 22, 2013 |
|
|
|org4=] |
|
|
|accessdate4=August 27, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|url5=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114418/bradley-manning-chelsea-now-wants-hormone-therapy |
|
:For reference the previous discussion of that picture is found here: ].--] (]) 16:03, 25 April 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|title5=He Is Not Bradley Manning. She Is Chelsea Manning. Deal With It. |
|
|
|author5=Ryan Kearney |
|
|
|date5=August 22, 2013 |
|
|
|accessdate5=August 27, 2013 |
|
|
|org5=] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|url6=http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2013/08/22/wikipedia-joins-supporters-in-quick-embrace-of-mannings-transition-from-bradley-to-chelsea/ |
|
::So what I get from that discussion is there is a worry that while Lamo and Poulsen are involved in the ] story Mitnick was not thus Misplaced Pages should censor his image. When did it become official policy to censor and rewrite history? Couldn't a decent descriptive caption be enough? -- ] (]) 16:15, 25 April 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|title6=Bradley Manning: 'I am a female' |
|
|
|org6=] |
|
|
|date6=August 22, 2013 |
|
|
|accessdate6=August 29, 2013 |
|
|
|author6=Barbara Kollmeyer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|title7=Behind the Misplaced Pages wars: what happened when Bradley Manning became Chelsea |
|
:Hi Sich, I'm not sure what your point is regarding the image needing to be downsized or removed. The point here is that two of the people in the image are fairly central to what transpired, as is the fact that they had a prior, long-term relationship. So the image is important, and has been published by other reliable sources for the same reason. But there was an objection from an editor (Collect) that the person in the middle is not related to this story, so I pixellated his face. That means we can use the image without implicating an uninvolved living person (per BLP). ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 17:15, 25 April 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|author7=Alex Hern |
|
::Why can't the image comment be used? Something like, "Pictured ] (left) and Wired's ] (right). ] (center) was uninvolved." Boom! BLP problem solved and you don't have to use the drastic and ominous pixelation which actually draws more attention to the mysterious censored individual. Not to mention the waste of bandwidth involved with creating and hosting a second image. -- ] (]) 01:05, 27 April 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|org7=] |
|
|
|date7=August 23, 2013 |
|
|
|accessdate7=August 23, 2013 |
|
|
|url7=http://www.newstatesman.com/sci-tech/2013/08/behind-wikipedia-wars-what-happened-when-bradley-manning-became-chelsea |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|url8=http://www.dailydot.com/lifestyle/wikipedia-battle-chelsea-bradley-manning-gender/ |
|
:::I don't mind which option you choose, Esemono, whether it's pixellating or making clear in the caption that Mitnick has no involvement. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 01:37, 27 April 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|title8=Misplaced Pages battle rages over Chelsea Manning's gender identity |
|
|
|author8=Tim Sampson |
|
|
|date8=August 23, 2013 |
|
|
|accessdate8=August 28, 2013 |
|
|
|org8=] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|title9=What's in a name? Chelsea Manning and Muhammad Ali |
|
::::It seems to me that pixelating a face in an image freely available without pixelation elsewhere on wikipedia detracts from the quality of the image and does not really serve to clarify the issue or protect the man in the center. Explanation by caption is a far more sensible option. - Anon <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:15, 30 April 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|url9=http://www.salon.com/2013/08/24/what%E2%80%99s_in_a_name_chelsea_manning_and_muhammad_ali/ |
|
:::::Hmmmm ... I've been seeing this sort of thing a number of times on America-related articles that tend to attract vested-interest lobbying. The route seems to be that such and such a person is the devil incarnate (or God incarnate, depending on which vested interest is active) so we will include photographs of anyone even remotely connected with that person since they too must be the devil incarnate because of that connection. There is no justification for including this picture - it does not depict the subject of the article, it does not depict the subject of the subsection of the article in which it appears, and it was taken 9 years before the content in which ONE of the individuals are mentioend happened. Images must be directly related to article content - they are not there to make weasily pov connections. There is a foul stench throughout this article. ] 23:12, 4 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|accessdate9=November 25, 2013 |
|
|
|org9=] |
|
|
|author9=Andrew O'Hehir |
|
|
|date9=August 24, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|url10=http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2013/0825/Bradley-or-Chelsea-What-to-call-Pvt.-Manning-video |
|
::::::Two of the people in the photograph are directly related to what happened, and this particular image has been discussed by journalists (e.g. Glen Greenwald) as evidence of their long-time relationship. That's why it's included. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 00:55, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|title10='Bradley' or 'Chelsea' – What to call Pvt. Manning? |
|
|
|org10=] |
|
|
|author10=Brad Knickerbocker |
|
|
|date10=August 25, 2013 |
|
|
|acccessdate10=August 28, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|url11=http://swampland.time.com/2013/08/28/media-makes-the-manning-switch/ |
|
== new photo == |
|
|
|
|title11=Media Makes the Manning Switch |
|
|
|author11=Katy Steinmetz |
|
|
|date11=August 28, 2013 |
|
|
|accessdate11=August 31, 2013 |
|
|
|org11=] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|url12=http://www.dailydot.com/news/wikipedia-chelsea-bradley-manning-transgender-debate/ |
|
this may be useful |
|
|
|
|title12=Misplaced Pages decides Chelesa Manning will remain 'Bradley' for now |
|
] |
|
|
|
|author12=Jay Hathaway |
|
] (]) 20:34, 27 April 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|date12=August 31, 2013 |
|
|
|accessdate12=August 31, 2013 |
|
|
|org12=] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|url13=http://www.newstatesman.com/alex-hern/2013/09/chelsea-manning-gets-put-back-closet-wikipedia |
|
:Excellent photograph, thank you! ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 21:14, 27 April 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|title13=Chelsea Manning gets put back in the closet by Misplaced Pages |
|
|
|author13=Alex Hern |
|
|
|date13=September 4, 2013 |
|
|
|accessdate13=September 4, 2013 |
|
|
|org13=] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|url14=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/oct/24/chelsea-manning-name-row-wikipedia-editors-banned-from-trans-pages |
|
::I asume it was not taken 20:32, 27 April 2012, so when was it taken? Is from the time of enlistning (2007)? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|title14=Chelsea Manning name row: Misplaced Pages editors banned from trans pages |
|
|
|author14=Alex Hern |
|
|
|date14=October 24, 2013 |
|
|
|accessdate14=October 24, 2013 |
|
|
|org14=] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|url15=http://www.dailydot.com/news/wikipedia-chelsea-manning-trans-edits/ |
|
:::It was not taken at the time of enlisting because he is already a Private First Class. Also, he has a 10th Mountain Division Badge pinned to his right breast pocket. So it was done sometime after he joined 10th Mtn and before he deployed. --] (]) 13:25, 28 April 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|title15=After Chelsea Manning row, Misplaced Pages bans transphobic editors |
|
|
|
|
|
|author15=Kevin Collier |
|
::::Any thoughts on whether this should be the main image? It does look good on the page, and I can see the arguments for keeping it as the lead image (he is currently a soldier, he got into trouble as a soldier, and he is facing a court martial). On the other hand, he joined in October 2007 and was arrested in May 2010 -- two and a half years of service. Using it as the main image feels as though we're saying this was his whole identity. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 23:50, 30 April 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|accessdate15=October 29, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|date15=October 26, 2013 |
|
:::::I've swapped their positions (regular clothes as lead image, uniform in one of the sections about his time in the army), and I'll add the uniformed image to the article about the trial. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 00:57, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|org15=] |
|
{{Talk:Bradley Manning/GA1}} |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Top 25 Report|Aug 18 2013|Jan 15 2017|May 14 2017|Apr 7 2019}} |
|
== If this article have to be "good" it must include reference to ] case == |
|
|
|
{{Old moves |
|
Hi |
|
|
|
|title1=Bradley Manning|title2=Chelsea Manning|title3=Breanna Manning|title4=Arrest of Bradley Manning |
|
I just read and see the film about ] case(Vietnam war related). I really don't known why it is not added(for e.g. on terrorist attacks You have related Misplaced Pages articles too) there. Especially because american law have first-justice-all in the same way usually laws. There is not even word compared to "ellsberg" in this wikipedia article, but his situation is identifical(almost, of course we can discuss about some little or more differences) - especially - the Ellsberg used a new technology, but now used by masses - identically did Manning but in other times. And generally the so called war diary with some exceptions is just a paper on used weapons, spotted enemy like the so called 70s pentagon papers. But please don't treat me as again army only - I think You must defend Yourself, but there is a difference(a so called lawful war) - if a gangster attack You with a weapon You can defend attack, but not to attack whole neighborhood and if someone show "your version only" in newspapers You shouldn't call him a spy. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:46, 3 May 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|list= |
|
|
|
|
|
*RM, Arrest of Bradley Manning → Bradley Manning, '''Moved''', 3 September 2010, ] |
|
{{Talk:Bradley Manning/GA2}} |
|
|
|
*RM, Bradley Manning → Alleged leaks of Bradley Manning, '''No consensus to move''', 8 Dec 2010, ] |
|
|
|
|
|
*Move/revert, Bradley Manning → Breanna Manning, '''Move was reverted''', 5 May 2012, ] |
|
== Article moved == |
|
|
|
*RM, Chelsea Manning → Bradley Manning, '''initial move of the article to "Chelsea Manning" is reverted, returning the article to the original title, "Bradley Manning"''', 31 August 2013, ] |
|
|
|
|
|
*RM, Bradley Manning → Private Manning, '''Not moved''', 4 September 2013, ] |
|
Hi. |
|
|
|
*RM, Bradley Manning → Chelsea Manning, '''Moved''', 1 October 2013, ] |
|
|
|
|
|
*RM, Chelsea Manning → Manning (U.S. Army), '''Not moved''', 14 March 2014, ] |
|
I've moved the article ] to ] due to major BLP concerns about how we identify Manning; from a reading of the sources in question, and of MOS:IDENTITY, I believe there are major BLP issues with how we refer to Manning as "he", despite sources also saying that her identity is female. |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Merged-from | Chelsea Manning gender identity media coverage| 18 September 2013}} |
|
Please direct the discussion to ]; this is a cross-posted notification. :) ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 20:50, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{Annual readership}} |
|
:And I've commented there that this article should not have been moved without discussion. Far too controversial a move, and you reverted another editor's attempt to restore the article to before the move. I'm not expressing an opinion on whether it ''should'' be moved, only that you follow proper procedure. As I said at BLPN, ] doesn't give you license to move the article, nor does your assertion that this is a BLP issue and trumps anyone else's views on the matter.--] (]) 21:26, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Archives|bot=lowercase sigmabot III|age=180|units=days|index=/Archive index}} |
|
::This move is a gross violation of ] policy. I shall be asking for appropriate action to be taken to prevent Sceptre from engaging in such ridiculous POV-pushing stunts again. ] (]) 22:24, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
:::How exactly is it a "gross violation of BLP policy"? ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 22:32, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 200K |
|
::::How is an entirely unsourced change of name and identified gender in a BLP a gross violation of policy? If you don't know that by now, I have to question your competence as a Misplaced Pages contributor. At no point has Manning either made a public statement to the effect that "she" is the appropriate pronoun, or that he/she wishes to be known as 'Breanna' - this entire hypothesis is based on selective quotations from a private conversation which Manning clearly didn't expect to become public, and in which he demonstrates his unstable and confused mental state. It is a gross insult to Manning to use a few words from a private conversation to unilaterally rename him and reassign his gender identity. Still, some people seem to find him a convenient platform for such ridiculous agenda-driven stunts... ] (]) |
|
|
|
|counter = 17 |
|
:::::{{ec}} First, we have Sceptre claiming that to call Manning a he is a BLP violation, and now Andy says to call Manning a she is a BLP violation. This issue was discussed just , and I think Sceptre, who did not participate in that discussion, needs to come up with "new" evidence that the consensus to keep the article male was wrong. My perfunctory research on Google News turns up virtually nothing new.--] (]) 23:08, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 5 |
|
::::::At the very least, calling Manning a "he" is a BLP violation; it is clear from the Lamo chat logs that she categorically did ''not'' identify as male. The discussions in the past have been talking about how she needed to "publicly come out" or how the sources referred to her as Bradley, hence it should stay at Bradley; all that is needed to change is a verifiable source about her gender identity. From the sources given, it's more of a jump to assume she doesn't identify as female. ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 23:24, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
:::::::Utter bullshit. ] (]) 23:26, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|algo = old(180d) |
|
::::::::Sceptre, do you really want to rely on those chat logs from 2010? I'm not as blunt as Andy, but that's hardly a reasonable basis for saying that Manning self-identifies as a woman.--] (]) 23:30, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|archive = Talk:Chelsea Manning/Archive %(counter)d |
|
:::::::::At the '''very least''', Manning '''does not identify as male'''. The chat logs are verified, after all. And from Fishman: |
|
|
|
}} |
|
::::::::::{{quote|“Bradley felt he was female,” the counselor told me. “He was very solid on that.” Quickly, their conversation shifted to the practicalities: How does someone transition from male to female? “He really wanted to do surgery,” the counselor recalled. “He was mostly afraid of being alone, being ostracized or somehow weird.”}} |
|
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=Talk:Chelsea Manning/Archive index|mask=Talk:Chelsea Manning/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=yes}} |
|
:::::::::If you're trying to suggest he's male, despite all that, then you're either dense or bigoted. ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 23:37, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::For the most part, considering your conduct, editors have been nicer to you than you deserve. I suggest you ''']'''.--] (]) 23:43, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::Wow, you just made the lowest level argument on ]. <font color="silver">]</font><font color="blue">]</font><sup>]</sup> 23:56, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::The only bigotry evident here is Sceptre's - who takes the slimmest of evidence to force Manning into a neat little gender-identity box. Much more concerned with pushing an agenda than with any considerations for the feelings of an individual the article cited clearly shows as troubled, and unsure over identity - and only discussing these issues in private. Still, sacrifices have to be made, and Manning makes a useful victim, given his inability to respond, and the more pressing issues concerning him at present. ] (]) 00:11, 6 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
A proper discussion should be made in order to determine consensus for such a move, before the move is taken. Shame on Sceptre for not doing that. <font color="silver">]</font><font color="blue">]</font><sup>]</sup> 23:03, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
: Complaints about a user's conduct are better suited for their talkpage or an appropriate noticeboard. Here at the talkpage, better to discuss content, please? --]]] 04:18, 6 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Political prisoner == |
|
Honestly I'm failing to see how the chatlogs being from 2010 makes it irrelevant. Andy, do you just not know anything about gender dysphoria? Manning herself has stated she is essentially traumatized by the media portraying her as being a man. When somebody has a gender identity issue, this kind of thing will push them into shame and they often will not discuss it or release any new information. Which I think is only fair, if the media generally denied my right to identify how I wanted and continued to continually paint me as another gender, I think I'd also just...not talk about it. The logs are verified and she has sought hormone replacement - which requires a psychiatrist to diagnose a gender identity issue. So. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:39, 9 May 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
:So there are still no sources which back the move. The advocates here are trying to grasp at straws because their position is so weak. Based on what has been brought forward, this issue has been concluded for now. When & if something receives coverage in reliables sources we can revisit this topic.<br/><span style="text-shadow:#294 0.1em 0.1em 0.3em; class=texhtml">]</span> 14:04, 9 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/chelsea-mannings-original-revelations-still-need-investigating |
|
::The simple fact of the matter is that, according to the latest evidence we have, Manning is currently not identifying as female: |
|
|
<blockquote>"If these materials are to be believed, then it appears that Manning was questioning his gender identity. Manning’s lawyers have noted that he had sought counseling, but we don’t know if any final decision was ever made. We don’t know whether Manning wanted “Breanna” to be a primary identity, or if this was an alter ego that was never meant to be indicative of primary gender identification. We do know — from our own private conversations with friends and family members — that prior to his incarceration, Manning had not asked people to refer to him with a female pronoun. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amnesty has campaigned for Manning’s release since 2013, when she was sentenced to 35 years’ imprisonment - a jail term much longer than for military personnel convicted of murder, rape and war crimes - for leaking classified government material. Amnesty believes the sentence was excessive and should have been commuted to time served (over three years at the time of sentencing), not least because Manning was overcharged using antiquated legislation aimed at dealing with treason, and denied the opportunity to use a public interest defence at her trial. |
|
The decision to transition – especially when it entails life-changing hormones or even surgery – isn’t something undergone lightly or quickly. Like many who are unsure about their gender identification, Manning used the Internet as a sandbox to begin experimenting with these complex issues. Unfortunately, he was arrested and forced to undergo many torturous months in solitary confinement, without proper medical, social, and emotional support during this time of questioning. We don’t know whether he reached a final decision".</blockquote> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the whistleblower was held for 11 months in pre-trial detention conditions that the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture Juan Mendez deemed to be cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. She was placed in solitary confinement as punishment for a suicide attempt last year, and was denied appropriate treatment related to her gender identity during her incarceration. In a podcast for Amnesty in 2016 (), Manning recounted the draconian nature of her pre-trial detention at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia: ] (]) 22:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
::Manning evidently currently wishes to be identified as male, and named 'Bradley', or 'Brad'. Any suggestions to the contrary are not only being made to push an agenda, but exploiting a vulnerable individual in no position to respond in order to do so. Misplaced Pages can play no part in such offensive behaviour. ] (]) 15:03, 9 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Unless there is a source showing that Manning '''publicly''' identifies as female, there is no reason to move the article. ] (]) 21:58, 9 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
:@], I'm unsure about your intentions. Do you think something needs to be added to the article? <b style="font-family:Monospace">-- ] (])</b> 22:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::I think it should be added to the article that Amnesty International considered Manning a political prisoner and demanded his release and regularly published articles about her. However, Amnesty International argued that not every political prisoner is given the special status of "prisoner of conscience", which is designed to draw maximum attention to a particular political prisoner. ] (]) 00:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
::::I don't know where the requirement for public identification comes from; all MOS:IDENTITY says is that self-identification, in a reliable source, is needed. Say a notable person who is privately transgender commits suicide (it's not unheard of), and in a press release or interview, their significant other or friends says " was really unhappy, because he felt that he was a woman inside, and desperately wanted to make his body look outside like he saw himself inside, but he couldn't find a way to actually make that happen". Would we refer to said person as a man, or a woman? It's pretty clear that that person identified as female, but didn't publicly announce it. ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 22:38, 9 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Sceptre, fuck off and troll elsewhere. You are clearly only here for your own infantile narcissistic reasons. Manning doesn't want to be 'identified as female', and has said so. ] (]) 05:19, 10 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
:::The term "political prisoner" is not used in either of the sources listed above, that I can find. -- ] (]) 02:05, 26 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 13 December 2023 == |
|
==Weasel-wording and edit warring== |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Edit semi-protected|Chelsea Manning|answered=yes}} |
|
After I had removed it, SlimVirgin (without ANY edit summary or talk page explanation) reinserted the word "liberal" as a characterisation of commentators who had wrote that Manning "was the most significant whistleblower since ex-Marine Daniel Ellsberg". "Liberal" is a pov term and cannot remain in the article. Even if there were some source that claimed commentators were "liberal", them the most that could be said was "such commentators have been called 'liberal' by such and such a source". SlimVirgin also inserted back the nationality (i.e. "he is not American") and the "background in computer hacking" (i.e. "he is a criminal") text about Assange - text which is clearly off-topic and which is there only for weasel purposes. He also reinserted the various clandestine (i.e. "used by criminals") methods of submitting material to Wikileaks (while carefully ommitting to mention the most obvious route - an ordinary email). All such material is again off-topic for this article and can be there only for weasel purposes. He also removed my edit connected to the "Collateral Murder" video, turning it into a weasily-worded text in which the event is described as a "gun attack in Baghdad" rather than a "helecopter attack over Baghdad" and in which the two separate attacks are made out to be just the one in which some children were "caught in the fire" rather than inside a van that was specifically targeted. He also removed the quotes from a quotation, an indication of the blind revert nature of his edits. I have reinstated my edits. ] 20:08, 7 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
Remove the phrase “and perhaps to study for a PhD in physics” as it is purely speculative. Manning had no higher education at the time of enlisting, and her GI Bill would have run out of money before reaching the doctorate level, so claiming she would have been acquiring a PhD with her GI Bill is inaccurate. Saying she enlisted in order to be eligible for GI Bill benefits is far more accurate. ] (]) 03:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:] '''Not done for now:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> The statement appears well-sourced – see ref 72 – is there some reason to assume the author of the reference was misinformed? ] (]) 07:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Who is Casey Manning? == |
|
:I'm following the sources, not to mention common knowledge, and I can't see what's problematic about "liberal." Conserative commentators have focused on the breach of law and confidentiality; liberal/left commentators on the conscientious whistleblowing aspect and the comparison to Ellsberg. What do you see as contentious about that? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who is Casey Manning? |
|
:As for the Assange paragraph, please don't remove that material again. He isn't an American, and he is a former (very well-known) computer hacker, and it's neither POV nor irrelevant to say so (how could it be "weasely" to say he's Australian?). Also, you removed that WikiLeaks used Tor etc, which is well-known, well-sourced, interesting, and explains how people were able to file untraceable submissions. (I'm a she, by the way.) ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 01:48, 8 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::Ahh ... "Common Knowlege" the slightly less ugly little brother of "Common Sense" - both are regularly brought out to justify things which cannot be easily justified by using sources or arguments. "Liberal" is a pov-term and a personal opinion about who are "conservative commentators" and who are "liberal commentators" is pov. If someone is being called a "liberal" or a "conservative", neutral sources are required to support such labels, and use of the label has to be justifiable as on-topic for inclusion in this article. To date there are no sources, and there is no justification. The meaning of such labels are also entirely US-centric and a product of current American society, and should be avoided for that reason alone. Everything that I removed about Assange I removed because it was off topic. What purpose is there to mention his nationality (other than the reason I suspected)? What purpose is there to stress the "hacking" (while avoiding mentioning his more recent and more relevant internet technologies background)? How can esoteric technical terms about how one might theoretically submit material anonymously to Wikileaks have any relevance to this article? If it is well-known, well-sourced, and interesting, then it should be in the article about Wikileaks, not here. You have not mentioned the "Collateral Murder" edits - are you accepting them? ] 02:10, 8 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are two mentions of this individual but no links or explanation about who this person is or how he/she/it are related to Chelsea/Bradley Manning. |
|
:::I will try to find a way to reword your liberal commentators concerns, but I am going to restore the WikiLeaks material, because of course it is directly relevant (please explain how saying Assange is Australian could be "weasel wording"). The material Manning said he gave WikiLeaks constitutes the bulk of its output, or at least the bulk of the material that made its name. So giving a summary-style rundown of who and what it is, per ], is of course relevant (not to mention that Manning's lawyer feels Manning has been overcharged because it's Assange that the govt wants). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The main article only says: "Manning has an older sister". |
|
:::As for the Collateral Murder edits, I'll take a look, but so long as they haven't changed the meaning, removed a key point, or caused problems with the writing, they should be fine. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 02:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
So I assume Casey is Chelsea's older sister, but this should be stated explicitly, otherwise further refernces to this appelation has no grounding in fact. |
|
::::Maybe you should have "taken a look" before reverting the first time. It is difficult to assume good faith when an editor deletes material without explanation and without, it seems, even a "look" at what she has deleted. ] 02:44, 8 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 14:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
:::::I did look at it before, and I couldn't see much difference (except that, as I recall, your description was less neutral). So I will look at it again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Fixed. I added the name to the statement she has an older sister.However, we may need to address how she is refered to later in the text, as at least one source gives her name as Casey Manning Majors, in which case she should be refered to once by that name and later by Majors during the testimony portion. -- ] (]) 14:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
:::::Please adjust the aggression and accusations, Meowy (and the hostile headers). I know a lot about this issue, because I've immersed myself in the sources. I'm trying hard to reflect the majority and significant-minority POVs in a way that's fair and accurate. And I'm also trying to keep the quality of the writing in order. It's not an easy balancing act, so by all means question what I'm doing, but there's no need to imply that I'm up to something dastardly. (And, please, I do want to know how saying Assange is Australian could be considered a weasely edit.) ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 02:51, 8 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:Thank you for the reply and the edit. |
|
|
:As to the naming, I am of the opinion that one should use the name of a person AT THE TIME of the event being discussed. |
|
|
:IF the event is at birth, then the birth name should be used. |
|
|
:In the case of the trial of "Bradley Manning" and prior events, it is wrong to distort history by speaking of "Chelsea Manning". If this becomes a requirement of "political correctness" then we are on a very slippery slope. ] (]) 11:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::This was already a requirement; see ] and supplementary essay {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Gender_identity#Retroactivity}}. It is not common in written English to treat the names of people, places, or things as temporally fixed in the way you suggest (in fact it would be extremely confusing). Correctly naming living biography subjects is an act of basic decency and respect. |
|
|
::If you have further comments or concerns on how Misplaced Pages writes about transgender people, please take them to a more general forum. Such a change would affect many more pages than this (and has been discussed to death hundreds of times and is never going to happen). –] (] • ]) 14:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== why is her deadname literally in the first sentence == |
|
::::::We should not used terms like ''liberal commentators'' for the same reason that we should not use the word ''confess''. The words carries implied statements and values not supported in the sources. It is also US centric as Meowy mentioned above, and carries a political weight that is also not supported in the sources. Had this been Europe, same statement could have called them ''socialists/communists commentators''. Additionally, the article ref notes claims a distinction between general political reaction, and activists/liberal commentators. This distinction can not be describe in any other words than plain POV and non-neutral. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
do better ] (]) 18:56, 2 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
::::::Assange's background should be kept at a minimum as that information is better placed at the ] article. For undue weight reasons, I would also not include the hacking background. The lead at the ] article describe his hacker-activistism as something of the past, not in the present. It also a description he is not well known for. Thus, presenting hacking as a prominent description of Assange is undue. Political/internet activist and journalist looks, given that article, to be the prominent description we should use. If someone disagree with this description, I advice trying to make a change at ] first. Summaries and Main articles need to be kept in sync. |
|
|
|
:According to the policy, since she was also notable under her previous name, it goes in the lead section (See ]. In fact, her situation is even used as an example).--] (]) 19:00, 2 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::cringe and transphobic ] (]) 19:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::@] How is it transphobic? It is a legit guideline, did you not even bother to read MOS:DEADNAME before you baselessly called someone cringe and transphobic? ] (]) 02:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== My removals == |
|
::::::Last as a minor disclaimer. I will apply some BOLD methods here and do one time edits. Please see the changes I do as practical suggestions. I have no intention of edit warring, but I do pref to write suggestions first and then discuss the suggested solution if they are disliked. ] (]) 08:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:Many of Manning's biggest supporters are far-right-wing and militia types. See for example , so I'm not sure I buy the "common knowledge" argument. That said, I haven't examined the issue in depth and it may be that the preponderance of sources are convincing. It would be good though to see some actual sources on this. ] (]) 21:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I made quite a few removals so I'm opening a discussion. My concern is that the military service section was wandering way off topic. A lot of the content there should be in a different section. ] (]) 10:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
::That article is about how a supporter of ] (who seems to be a ]) tried to compare Lakin to Manning, along the lines of "liberals/the left support Manning, so why not Lakin?" (because they are both soldiers being held for disobeying orders). But it doesn't mean the Right supports Manning. You could be right, but I haven't noticed anything like that. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 22:08, 9 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
Amnesty has campaigned for Manning’s release since 2013, when she was sentenced to 35 years’ imprisonment - a jail term much longer than for military personnel convicted of murder, rape and war crimes - for leaking classified government material. Amnesty believes the sentence was excessive and should have been commuted to time served (over three years at the time of sentencing), not least because Manning was overcharged using antiquated legislation aimed at dealing with treason, and denied the opportunity to use a public interest defence at her trial.
In addition, the whistleblower was held for 11 months in pre-trial detention conditions that the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture Juan Mendez deemed to be cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. She was placed in solitary confinement as punishment for a suicide attempt last year, and was denied appropriate treatment related to her gender identity during her incarceration. In a podcast for Amnesty in 2016 (www.amnesty.org.uk/chelsea), Manning recounted the draconian nature of her pre-trial detention at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia: TimurMamleev (talk) 22:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Remove the phrase “and perhaps to study for a PhD in physics” as it is purely speculative. Manning had no higher education at the time of enlisting, and her GI Bill would have run out of money before reaching the doctorate level, so claiming she would have been acquiring a PhD with her GI Bill is inaccurate. Saying she enlisted in order to be eligible for GI Bill benefits is far more accurate. 2600:6C46:6B00:297:1C39:E471:36B6:43B2 (talk) 03:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
There are two mentions of this individual but no links or explanation about who this person is or how he/she/it are related to Chelsea/Bradley Manning.
The main article only says: "Manning has an older sister".
So I assume Casey is Chelsea's older sister, but this should be stated explicitly, otherwise further refernces to this appelation has no grounding in fact.
I made quite a few removals so I'm opening a discussion. My concern is that the military service section was wandering way off topic. A lot of the content there should be in a different section. Jozsefs (talk) 10:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)