| Revision as of 11:17, 13 May 2012 editThe Bushranger (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators157,430 edits →Strange...: comment← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:22, 7 January 2025 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,378,487 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:The Bushranger/Archive38. (BOT) | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| |archiveprefix=User talk:The Bushranger/Archive | |archiveprefix=User talk:The Bushranger/Archive | ||
| |format=%%i | |format=%%i | ||
| |age= |
|age=36 | ||
| |index= | |index= | ||
| |minkeepthreads=2 | |minkeepthreads=2 | ||
| |header={{talkarchive}} | |header={{talkarchive}} | ||
| |maxarchsize=125000 | |maxarchsize=125000 | ||
| |numberstart= |
|numberstart=13 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{Notice|<br> | {{Notice|<br> | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| *If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you ''will'' be reverted...and ''''''.}} | *If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you ''will'' be reverted...and ''''''.}} | ||
| {{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{ |
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{Togneme Userbox}} | ||
| {{ |
{{Archives|search=yes|list=] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] -<br/> ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ]}} | ||
| ⚫ | {{clear}} | ||
| ==DYK for Tsybin Ts-25== | |||
| ==DYK nomination of NASCAR Grand National East Series== | |||
| {{ivmbox | |||
| ] Hello! Your submission of ] at the ] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath ''']''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> ] (]) 10:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| |image = Updated DYK query.svg | |||
| |imagesize=40px | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the military glider ''']''' was considered for use as a civilian airliner on routes including to ]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ♠]♠ ] 12:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| {{DYK views|7,400|616.7|January 2025|Tsybin Ts-25}} ] (] • ]) (he/]) 03:27, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Autopatrolled == | ||
| Hey Bushranger, have you ever thought about giving yourself the ] userright? It seems you know your way around content, so I don't see the point of sending all your pages to NPP... ] </span>]] 22:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| What is the process for further discussion on CFD after it has been closed? With ] the only opposes were from contributors that have not been active in this area and I think not aware of the discussion that have taken place over the years on the subject. Yes the wording of this administration category on requests for images is a little annoying but that is what it is. OK, I can live with the decision but seams a little annoying to keep a category that no one uses and is only misleading. --] (]) 17:29, 11 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| : |
:Huh. Apparently 'Autopatrolled' isn't part of the administrator system - I'd thought it was (looking at my user rights log, I *had* it before becoming an admin). Given ] states {{tqq|Administrators may also assign the right to themselves}} I've done so - thanks for poking me to notice this. - ] <sub>]</sub> 22:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ::<s>I think it used to be part of admin rights, but they overhauled Autopatrolled a few years back, and tightened the requirements to be an NPP. I used to have it (not an admin), but I lost it under the new rules. I don't want to jump through the new hoops, so I've gone without NPP for several years now.</s> ] (]) 23:18, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::*Never mind. I'm still an autopatroller, but not an NPP. I got mixed up. {{fpm}} ] (]) 23:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == RfC/U notice == | |||
| ::*:Autopatrolled was removed from the admin bundle a little over three years ago, with the message that admins were free to re-add it for themselves. I did so for a while, but have since decided that my average of one new article a month does not place much of a burden on NPP, and there may be a benefit having someone else confirm I didn't mess up. ] 23:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :::*Ah, that explains it, thanks. And don't worry Bil, some days I have trouble remembering where my alarm clock is as it's going off! - ] <sub>]</sub> 23:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| As you have worked with ], I wanted to make you aware of ]. I know it's moving backwards, but I'd like to have all previous attempts at least tried before going for the final solution. ] (]) 01:35, 12 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for the note, but I believe I left my ten-foot pole in my other set of adventuring gear. :) - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 14:10, 12 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Whitespace == | |||
| The discussion an AN/I regarding white space is a difference when a hidden comment is followed or preceded by a line break (enter on the keyboard). Please drop me a line if you need clarification.] (]) 17:29, 12 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Still needs to go to ], I think. - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 03:09, 13 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well, isn't this a site wide issue, regarding format; more of a manual of style purview than a dispute on one article?] (]) 04:50, 13 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == New CfD == | |||
| Since you participated in earlier CfDs about related categories, I want to make sure you know about ]. --] (]) 22:42, 12 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| ==Strange...== | |||
| *BR, did I get wrong? clearly shows that he was blocked once for disruptive behaviour. Also, the IP has twice reverted ( & ) that ''standard Static ISP template'' and is now acccusing me of being related to another editor . Thoughts? --<small>] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup></small> 00:41, 13 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Looks to me like "pot-stirring", best to let the sock-accusations bounce off as I do with those who insist I must be {{user|Archtransit}}! - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 03:12, 13 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::*What about the warning template? FWIW, he has removed it twice without giving any explanation whatsoever. --<small>] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup></small> 03:15, 13 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::*Not sure about the static-IP template. As for the warning template, IIRC he's ''technically'' allowed to remove it, even without comment, but in doing so implicitly acknolwedges that it has been "read and understood". - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 03:16, 13 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::*TBH, I haven't got much confidence in the IP editor due to his constant edit warring earlier on ] and now on ] with other editors, I will restore that template and leave it at that, barring his imminent second block, I will just add another template of ''"Repeat-Vandal"'' at a later stage. Thoughts? --<small>] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup></small> 03:24, 13 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::*Sounds reasonable enough. - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 03:53, 13 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::*Thank you... and --<small>] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup></small> 04:05, 13 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | {{ |
||
| *'''Update:''' Why am I not surprised... . Also, he just lighted up my sock radar for some strange reasons. Thoughts? --<small>] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup></small> 09:04, 13 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| **{{facepalm}} He's obviously not new to the WikiWorld, but as for who, well, no idea! - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 11:17, 13 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:22, 7 January 2025
 |
|
 | This editor is a Grand High Togneme Vicarus and is entitled to write the Book of All Knowledge: 2nd Edition. |
 Archives |
|
as Aerobird - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
DYK for Tsybin Ts-25
On 5 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tsybin Ts-25, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the military glider Tsybin Ts-25 was considered for use as a civilian airliner on routes including to Moscow? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tsybin Ts-25. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tsybin Ts-25), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 7,400 views (616.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2025 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Autopatrolled
Hey Bushranger, have you ever thought about giving yourself the autopatrolled userright? It seems you know your way around content, so I don't see the point of sending all your pages to NPP... Toadspike 22:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Huh. Apparently 'Autopatrolled' isn't part of the administrator system - I'd thought it was (looking at my user rights log, I *had* it before becoming an admin). Given WP:AUTOPATROLLED states
Administrators may also assign the right to themselves
I've done so - thanks for poking me to notice this. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)I think it used to be part of admin rights, but they overhauled Autopatrolled a few years back, and tightened the requirements to be an NPP. I used to have it (not an admin), but I lost it under the new rules. I don't want to jump through the new hoops, so I've gone without NPP for several years now.BilCat (talk) 23:18, 5 January 2025 (UTC)- Never mind. I'm still an autopatroller, but not an NPP. I got mixed up.
Facepalm BilCat (talk) 23:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Autopatrolled was removed from the admin bundle a little over three years ago, with the message that admins were free to re-add it for themselves. I did so for a while, but have since decided that my average of one new article a month does not place much of a burden on NPP, and there may be a benefit having someone else confirm I didn't mess up. Donald Albury 23:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, that explains it, thanks. And don't worry Bil, some days I have trouble remembering where my alarm clock is as it's going off! - The Bushranger One ping only 23:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Never mind. I'm still an autopatroller, but not an NPP. I got mixed up.
