Revision as of 22:15, 23 May 2012 view source89.100.207.51 (talk) that's not a nationTag: section blanking← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:26, 7 July 2024 view source Dawnseeker2000 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers484,929 editsm →Israel/Palestine: minor formattingTag: AWB | ||
(384 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Conceptual right of nations}} | |||
{{For|a book|Right to Exist: a Moral Defense of Israel's Wars}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2024}} | |||
{{For|personal right to exist|Right to life}} | |||
{{pp-extended|small=yes}} | |||
{{disputed|date=January 2012}} | |||
{{unreliable sources|date=January 2012}} | |||
⚫ | ] defended the right to exist in "]" (1882).]] | ||
⚫ | ] defended the right to exist in "]" (1882).]] | ||
⚫ | The '''right to exist''' is said to be an attribute of |
||
⚫ | The '''right to exist''' is said to be an attribute of nations. According to an ] by the 19th-century French philosopher ], a state has the right to exist when individuals are willing to sacrifice their own interests for the community it represents. Unlike ], the right to exist is an attribute of states rather than of peoples. It is not a right recognized in international law. The phrase has featured prominently in the ] since the 1950s. | ||
⚫ | The right to exist of a ''de facto'' state may be balanced against another state's right to ].<ref>Lagerwall, Anne. "", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the |
||
⚫ | The right to exist of a ''de facto'' state may be balanced against another state's right to ].<ref>Lagerwall, Anne. " {{dead link|date=June 2022|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Law and Society Association, Hilton Bonaventure, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 27 May 2008.</ref> Proponents of the right to exist trace it back to the "right of existence", said to be a fundamental right of states recognized by writers on international law for hundreds of years.<ref name="Oppenheim">Oppenheim, Lassa and Ronald Roxburgh, (2005) '' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200105063344/https://books.google.com/books?id=vxJ1Jwmyw0EC&pg=PA193&dq=#PPA192,M1 |date=5 January 2020 }}'', p. 192–193.</ref> | ||
⚫ | ==Historical use== | ||
⚫ | ] used the phrase "right to exist" to refer to forms of government, arguing that representative government has a right to exist, but that hereditary government does not.<ref>Paine, Thomas, "Dissertation on the First Principles of Government" (1795), ''The Life and Works of Thomas Paine |
||
⚫ | ==Historical use== | ||
There is also a state's right "to perpetuate itself". This right was invoked in legal proceedings in post-War Germany as a defence of individuals in the judiciary system accused of participating in Nazi era repressions against those who were percecuted for "anti-state" activities, real or perceived.{{Citation needed|date=February 2012}} | |||
⚫ | ] (1737–1809) used the phrase "right to exist" to refer to forms of government, arguing that representative government has a right to exist, but that hereditary government does not.<ref>Paine, Thomas, "Dissertation on the First Principles of Government" (1795), ''The Life and Works of Thomas Paine'', 5:221--25.</ref> In 1823, Sir ] argued for the "right to exist in the Greek people".<ref name="google249">Scott, Walter, " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220320103428/https://books.google.com/books?id=nA9uAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA249&dq= |date=2022-03-20 }}", ''Edinburgh Annual Register of 1823'', p. 249.</ref> (The Greeks were then ].) According to Renan's "]" (1882), "So long as this moral consciousness gives proof of its strength by the sacrifices which demand the abdication of the individual to the advantage of the community, it is legitimate and has the right to exist. If doubts arise regarding its frontiers, consult the populations in the areas under dispute."<ref name="Renan">], " {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130319081440/http://ig.cs.tu-berlin.de/oldstatic/w2001/eu1/dokumente/Basistexte/Renan1882EN-Nation.pdf |date=2013-03-19 }}", 1882.</ref> Existence is not a historical right, but "a daily ], just as an individual's existence is a perpetual affirmation of life," Renan said.<ref name="Renan"/> The phrase gained enormous usage in reference to the breakup of the ] in 1918. "If Turkey has a right to exist – and the Powers are very prompt to assert that she has – she possesses an equally good right to defend herself against all attempts to imperil her political existence," wrote Eliakim and Robert Littell in 1903.<ref>Littell, Eliakim and Robert S. Littell, "The Reign of Terror in Macedonia", ''The Living Age'', April–June 1903, p. 68.</ref> In many cases, a nation's right to exist is not questioned, and is therefore not asserted.{{citation needed|date=June 2022}} | ||
== |
==Examples== | ||
⚫ | ===Armenia=== | ||
In 2008, ], ] ambassador to ], told the '']'' newspaper that "] should feel they can voice their concerns and can be open about their identity... we also say of course that the Abkhaz nation has a right to exist and to decide for themselves how they are going to live and how they want to use the ]".<ref>Patricia Flor: "Abkhaz conflict is no longer frozen; The German ambassador says Abkhazs distrust the European Union," by Ketevan Khachidze, Georgian Times, 2008.08.04 </ref> | |||
The right to exist of ] became known as the ] during the ] in 1878, and would again be asked during the ] in ].<ref>{{cite book|author=John Riddell|title=To the Masses: Proceedings of the Third Congress of the Communist International, 1921|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PFLoBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA1|date=2014|publisher=Brill Academic|isbn=978-90-04-28803-4|pages=28|access-date=2015-04-14|archive-date=2022-04-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220405055719/https://books.google.com/books?id=PFLoBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA1|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In August 2008 ] recognised Abkhazia's independence, stating that "Using repeatedly brutal military force against the peoples, whom, according to his words, he would like to see within his State, Mikhail Saakashvili left them no other choice but to ensure their security and the right to exist through self-determination as independent States."<ref>{{dead link|date=January 2012}}</ref> | |||
===Basque nation=== | ===Basque nation=== | ||
{{Main|Basque nationalism}} | |||
According to ] nationalists, "] (the name of our country in our own language) is the country of the Basques with as such right to exist independently as a nation as ] or |
According to ] nationalists, "] (the name of our country in our own language) is the country of the Basques with as such right to exist independently as a nation as ] or Ireland. The Basques are a very ancient people..."<ref>Nationalism, Naunihal Singh, Mittal Publications, 2006, p. 111.</ref> | ||
=== |
===Israel/Palestine=== | ||
{{See also|International recognition of Israel|International recognition of the State of Palestine}} | |||
The phrase, "right to exist" has also been used in reference to the right of Chechens (in the eyes of supporters) to establish a state independent from Russia.<ref>Wood, Tony. ''Chechnya, the Case for Independence''. Page 6</ref>{{Failed verification|date=February 2012}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.watchdog.cz/?show=000000-000004-000003-000130&lang=1 |title=Prague Watchdog - Crisis in Chechnya - An empire on the verge of collapse |publisher=Watchdog.cz |date= |accessdate=2012-01-21}}</ref>{{Failed verification|date=February 2012}} | |||
In 1947, a United Nations General Assembly resolution provided for the creation of an "Arab State" and a "Jewish State" to exist within ] in the United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine. The ], precursor to the ], agreed to the plan, but the Palestinians rejected it and fighting broke out. After Israel's 14 May 1948 unilateral declaration of independence, support from neighboring Arab states escalated the 1947–48 Civil War in ] into the ]. The legal and territorial status of Israel and ] is still hotly disputed in the region and within the international community. | |||
According to ], Arab recognition of Israel's right to exist was part of ]'s 1948 peace plan.<ref name=pappe>Ilan Pappé, '' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170329153011/https://books.google.com/books?id=zAJZCKAwtPMC&source=gbs_navlinks_s |date=29 March 2017 }}'', I.B.Tauris, 1994, p. 149.</ref> The Arab states gave this as their reason to reject the plan.<ref name=pappe/> In the 1950s UK MP ] cited then Egyptian President ] as saying "Israel is an artificial State which must disappear."<ref>*"Foreign Affairs; A Time to Find a Solution for Palestine", ''The New York Times'' 2 August 1958. "Most Arab leaders do not even dare admit Israel's right to exist. They fear assassination by fanatics."<br/>*''Parliamentary debates: Official report:'' Volume 547 (1956), Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons: "I will give two short quotations, one from Colonel Nasser, the Prime Minister of Egypt, on 8th May, 1954. It is an extremist point of view based on the belief and the assertion that Israel has no right to exist at all."<br/>*"Arms and the Middle East", ''Toledo Blade'', 30 September 1955. "the Arabs still refuse to acknowledge Israel's right to exist."</ref> The issue was described as the central one between Israel and the Arabs.<ref>"And underlying all of the questions dividing Israel and its Arab neighbors, one issue is central: Does Israel have a right to exist?" (Farrell, James Thomas, '' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200105063353/https://books.google.com/books?id=AnI9AAAAMAAJ&q= |date=5 January 2020 }}'', 1958)</ref> | |||
⚫ | === |
||
In the 1950s and 1960s, most Arab leaders did not dare admit that Israel had a right to exist.<ref>*"Foreign Affairs; A Time to Find a Solution for Palestine", ''New York Times'' Aug 2, 1958. "Most Arab leaders do not even dare admit Israel's right to exist. They fear assassination by fanatics."<br/>*''Parliamentary debates: Official report:'' Volume 547 (1956), Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons: "I will give two short quotations, one from Colonel Nasser, the Prime Minister of Egypt, on 8th May, 1954. It is an extremist point of view based on the belief and the assertion that Israel has no right to exist at all."<br/>*"Arms and the Middle East", ''Toledo Blade'', Sep 30, 1955. "the Arabs still refuse to acknowledge Israel's right to exist."</ref> The issue was described as the central one between Israel and the Arabs.<ref>"And underlying all of the questions dividing Israel and its Arab neighbors, one issue is central: Does Israel have a right to exist?" (Farrell, James Thomas, '''', 1958)</ref> After the June 1967 war, Egyptian spokesman Mohammed H. el-Zayyat stated that Cairo had accepted Israel's right to exist since the signing of the ] in 1949.<ref name="Whetten">{{cite book |last=Whetten |first=Lawrence L.|title=The Canal War: Four-Power Conflict in the Middle East|url=http://books.google.com/?id=AY9tAAAAMAAJ&q= |publisher=MIT Press|location=Cambridge, Massachusetts|year=1974|isbn=0-262-23069-0|page=51}}</ref> He added that this did not imply ] of Israel.<ref name="Whetten"/> In September, the Arab leaders adopted a hardline "three no's" position in the ]. But in November, Egypt accepted ], which implied acceptance of Israel's right to exist. At the same time, President ] urged ] and other Palestinian leaders to reject the resolution. "You must be our irresponsible arm," he said.<ref>Alexander, Anne, '''', p. 150. ISBN 1-904341-83-7.</ref> King Hussein of Jordan also acknowledged that Israel had a right to exist at this time.<ref>Dennon, Leon, "Key to Peace in Mideast", ''Owosso Argus-Press'', Nov 25, 1967.</ref> Meanwhile, Syria rejected Resolution 242, saying that it, "refers to Israel's right to exist and it ignores the right of the refugees to return to their homes."<ref>Lukacs, Yehuda, '''', 1999. Syracuse University Press, pp. 98–99.</ref> | |||
After the June 1967 war, Egyptian spokesman Mohammed H. el-Zayyat stated that Cairo had accepted Israel's right to exist since the signing of the ] in 1949.<ref name="Whetten">{{cite book |last=Whetten |first=Lawrence L.|title=The Canal War: Four-Power Conflict in the Middle East|url=https://archive.org/details/canalwarfourpowe00llwh |url-access=registration |publisher=MIT Press|location=Cambridge, Massachusetts|year=1974|isbn=0-262-23069-0|page=}}</ref> He added that this did not imply ] of Israel.<ref name="Whetten"/> In September, the Arab leaders adopted a hardline "three nos" position in the ]: No peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, and no negotiations with Israel.<ref>{{cite web|title=Khartoum Resolution|url=http://www.cfr.org/international-peace-and-security/khartoum-resolution/p14841?breadcrumb=%2Fpublication%2Fpublication_list%3Ftype%3Dessential_document%26page%3D69|publisher=]|access-date=7 June 2012|quote=The Khartoum Resolution passed by the Arab League in the wake of the 1967 war is famous for the "Three Nos" articulated in the third paragraph: No peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, and no negotiations with Israel.|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120520124345/http://www.cfr.org/international-peace-and-security/khartoum-resolution/p14841?breadcrumb=%2Fpublication%2Fpublication_list%3Ftype%3Dessential_document%26page%3D69|archive-date=20 May 2012}}</ref> But in November, Egypt accepted ], which implied acceptance of Israel's right to exist. At the same time, Nasser urged ] and other Palestinian leaders to reject the resolution. "You must be our irresponsible arm," he said.<ref>Alexander, Anne, '''', p. 150. {{ISBN|1-904341-83-7}}.</ref> King Hussein of Jordan also acknowledged that Israel had a right to exist at this time.<ref>Dennon, Leon, "Key to Peace in Mideast", ''Owosso Argus-Press'', 25 November 1967.</ref> Meanwhile, Syria rejected Resolution 242, saying that it, "refers to Israel's right to exist and it ignores the right of the refugees to return to their homes."<ref>Lukacs, Yehuda, '' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200105063359/https://books.google.com/books?id=Mv8R-o_b0acC&dq= |date=5 January 2020 }}'', 1999. Syracuse University Press, pp. 98–99.</ref> | |||
Upon assuming the ]ship in 1977, ] spoke as follows: | Upon assuming the ]ship in 1977, ] spoke as follows: | ||
Our right to exist—have you ever heard of such a thing? Would it enter the mind of any Briton or Frenchman, Belgian or Dutchman, Hungarian or Bulgarian, Russian or American, to request for its people recognition of its right to exist? ... Mr. Speaker: From the Knesset of Israel, I say to the world, our very existence per se is our right to exist!<ref>" {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180829072200/http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Foreign%20Relations/Israels%20Foreign%20Relations%20since%201947/1977-1979/1%20Statement%20to%20the%20%20Knesset%20by%20Prime%20Minister%20Begi |date=29 August 2018 }}", Volumes 4–5: 1977–1979, Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs.</ref> | |||
As reported by '']'', in 1988 ] declared that the Palestinians accepted ] and ], which would guarantee ''"the right to exist in peace and security for all".''<ref>{{cite news |author=Paul Lewis |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1988/12/14/world/arafat-in-geneva-calls-on-israelis-to-join-in-talks.html?src=pm |title=Arafat, In Geneva, Calls on Israelis To Join in Talks |work=The New York Times |date=14 December 1988 |access-date=2012-10-12 |archive-date=2016-01-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160106232125/http://www.nytimes.com/1988/12/14/world/arafat-in-geneva-calls-on-israelis-to-join-in-talks.html?src=pm |url-status=live }}</ref> In June 2009, US president ] said "Israelis must acknowledge that just as Israel's right to exist cannot be denied, neither can Palestine's."<ref name="bbc- obama">{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8083107.stm |title=Middle East | Obama on Israeli-Palestinian 'stalemate' |publisher=BBC News |date=4 June 2009 |access-date=2012-01-21 |archive-date=2015-12-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151225114047/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8083107.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
As reported by the '']'', in 1988 ] declared that the Palestinians had accepted Israel's right to exist.<ref>{{cite web|author=November 11, 2004 2:00 am |url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a6fc921c-3386-11d9-b6c3-00000e2511c8.html#axzz1TIo4nrB7 |title=After Arafat, a chance for change |publisher=FT.com |date=2004-11-11 |accessdate=2012-01-21}}</ref> In 1993, there was an official exchange of letters between Israeli Prime Minister ] and Chairman Arafat, in which Arafat declared that "the PLO affirms that those articles of the Palestinian Covenant which deny Israel's right to exist, and the provisions of the Covenant which are inconsistent with the commitments of this letter are now inoperative and no longer valid."<ref></ref> | |||
[[File:Countries recognizing Israel.svg|thumb|350px|{{legend inline|Yellow|State of Israel}}<br /> | |||
{{legend inline|Green|Countries that recognize Israel}}<br /> | |||
{{legend inline|#501616|Countries that have withdrawn their recognition of Israel}}<br /> | |||
{{legend inline|#c83737|Countries that have suspended/cut bilateral ties with Israel}}<br /> | |||
{{legend inline|#b9b9b9|Countries that have never recognized Israel}}]] | |||
]}}{{Legend|#008100|Countries that have recognised the State of Palestine}}{{Legend|#E1E1E1|Countries that have not recognised the State of Palestine}}]] | |||
In 1993, there was an official exchange of letters between Israeli Prime Minister ] and chairman Arafat, in which Arafat declared that "the PLO affirms that those articles of the Palestinian Covenant which deny Israel's right to exist, and the provisions of the Covenant which are inconsistent with the commitments of this letter are now inoperative and no longer valid."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://archive.adl.org/backgrounders/revision_of_plo_covenant.html#.WGSFAHpo-G8|title=You are being redirected...|website=archive.adl.org|access-date=2017-05-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170501153721/http://archive.adl.org/backgrounders/revision_of_plo_covenant.html#.WGSFAHpo-G8|archive-date=2017-05-01|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
In 2009 Prime Minister ] demanded the ]'s acceptance of Israel's right to exist as a ], which the Palestinian Authority rejected.<ref |
In 2009 Prime Minister ] demanded the ]'s acceptance of Israel's right to exist as a ], which the Palestinian Authority rejected.<ref name="Ronen, Gil, ">{{cite web|url=http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/124218|title=Olmert to Demand PA Accept Israel as Jewish State|website=Israel National News|date=11 November 2007 |access-date=2009-04-29|archive-date=2009-03-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090313064634/http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/124218|url-status=live}}</ref> The Knesset plenum gave initial approval in May 2009 to a bill criminalising the public denial of Israel's right to exist as a ], with a penalty of up to a year in prison.<ref name="haaretz.com">Shragai, Nadav, " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090530123308/http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1088712.html |date=2009-05-30 }}", ''Haaretz'', 30 May 2009.</ref> In 2011 Palestinian President ] said in a speech to the Dutch Parliament that the Palestinian people recognise Israel's right to exist and they hope the Israeli government will respond by "recognizing the Palestinian state on the borders of the land occupied in 1967."<ref name="auto1"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130722155022/http://www.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-Politics/We-recognize-Israel-they-should-recognize-Palestine |date=22 July 2013 }}. '']'', 30 June 2011.</ref> | ||
Israeli government ministers ] and ] have repeatedly rejected the ], with Bennett stating "I will do everything in my power to make sure they never get a state."<ref>David Remnick (21 January 2013), {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140401033813/http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/01/21/130121fa_fact_remnick |date=1 April 2014 }} '']''</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4446604,00.html|title=Bennett: Palestinian state a mistake, will work against it|newspaper=Ynetnews|date=28 October 2013|last1=Azulay|first1=Moran|access-date=23 November 2013|archive-date=23 November 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131123085713/http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4446604,00.html|url-status=live}}</ref> In June 2016 a poll showed that only 4 out of 20 Israeli ministers accepted the state of Palestine's right to exist.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.727431/|title=Only Four of 20 Israeli Ministers Openly Declare Support of Two-state Solution|last=Haaretz|date=27 June 2016|newspaper=Haaretz|access-date=1 January 2017|archive-date=3 January 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170103002313/http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.727431|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
According to the ] ], the term "right to exist" is unique to the ]: "No state has a right to exist, and no one demands such a right....In an effort to prevent negotiations and a diplomatic settlement, the U.S. and Israel insisted on raising the barrier to something that nobody's going to accept.... not going to accept...the legitimacy of their dispossession."<ref name="chomskyrighttoexist">{{cite web|url=http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/200506--.htm|title=On the Future of Democracy, Noam Chomsky interviewed by John P. Titlow|date= 2005-06-01|accessdate=2008-03-20|first=John|last=Titlow|work=chomsky.info}}</ref> ] argued that Israel's insistence on a right to exist forces Palestinians to provide a moral justification for their own suffering.<ref name="Whitbeck">{{cite news |url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0202/p09s02-coop.html |title=What 'Israel's right to exist' means to Palestinians |last=Whitbeck |first=John V. |date=February 2, 2007 |publisher=The Christian Science Monitor|accessdate=2009-05-27}}</ref> | |||
John V. Whitbeck argued that Israel's insistence on a right to exist forces Palestinians to provide a moral justification for their own suffering.<ref name="Whitbeck">{{cite news |url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0202/p09s02-coop.html |title=What 'Israel's right to exist' means to Palestinians |last=Whitbeck |first=John V. |date=2 February 2007 |work=The Christian Science Monitor|access-date=2009-05-27 |archive-date=2009-03-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090308023508/http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0202/p09s02-coop.html |url-status=live }}</ref> ] has argued that no state has the right to exist, that the concept was invented in the 1970s, and that Israel's right to exist cannot be accepted by the Palestinians.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180524081232/https://chomsky.info/200506__/ |date=24 May 2018 }}, Dragonfire, June 2005</ref> | |||
International law scholar ] observed in 2013 that "the question whether Israel has a legal right to exist might appear to be one of the most emotively charged in the vocabulary of international law and politics. It evokes immediately the 'exterminationist' rhetoric of numerous Arab and Islamic politicians and ideologues, not least the present President of Iran." (referring to then <!-- when written in 2013 --> president ])<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Carty|first1=Anthony|title=Israel's Legal Right to Exist and the Principle of the Self-determination of the Palestinian People?|journal=The Modern Law Review|date=January 2013|volume=76|issue=1|pages=158–177|doi=10.1111/1468-2230.12007|url=http://intr2dok.vifa-recht.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/mir_derivate_00003238/Carty%20-%20Kattan%20review%20article%20on%20Israel-Palestine_MLR%202013.pdf|access-date=2020-09-03|archive-date=2021-12-03|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211203140621/https://intr2dok.vifa-recht.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/mir_derivate_00003238/Carty%20-%20Kattan%20review%20article%20on%20Israel-Palestine_MLR%202013.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Kurdistan=== | ===Kurdistan=== | ||
Representatives of the Kurdish people regularly assert their right to exist as a nation.<ref>Official report of debates | Representatives of the ] regularly assert their right to exist as a nation.<ref>Official report of debates | ||
Authors Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe, Council of Europe, Council of Europe, 1994, p. 747.</ref><ref>Democracy and Human Rights in Multicultural Societies, Matthias Koenig, Paul F. A. Guchteneire, Unesco, Ashgate Publishing, 2007, p. 95.</ref><ref>Homeward Bound; KURDISTAN: In the Shadow of History. By Susan Meiselas, Random House, 1997, reviewed by Christopher Hitchens, Los Angeles Times, |
Authors Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe, Council of Europe, Council of Europe, 1994, p. 747.</ref><ref>Democracy and Human Rights in Multicultural Societies, Matthias Koenig, Paul F. A. Guchteneire, Unesco, Ashgate Publishing, 2007, p. 95.</ref><ref>Homeward Bound; KURDISTAN: In the Shadow of History. By Susan Meiselas, Random House, 1997, reviewed by Christopher Hitchens, Los Angeles Times, 7 December 1997.</ref> | ||
===Palestine=== | |||
===Northern Ireland=== | |||
In 1947, the ] affirmed the right of an "Arab State" and a "Jewish State" to exist within Palestine. The Jews agreed to the plan, but the Arabs denied and attacked the Jewish population of Palestine, in what was called the ]. However, ] is still disputed. {{Numrec|Pal|asof=S|link=N}} ({{Numrec|Pal|link=N|pcent=UN}}) of the 193 member states of the United Nations have ]. Their total population is over 5.2 billion people, equalling 75% of the world's population.<ref>{{Cite news|author=Staff writers|title=Three-quarters of world recognizes Palestine|url=http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=416575|date=28 August 2011|publisher=Ma'an News Agency|accessdate=2011-08-29}}</ref> | |||
The 1937 ] originally claimed the national territory consisted of the whole of the island in ], denying ]'s right to exist.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Welsh |first=Frank |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=a9SqQ2YkDhAC&pg=PA358 |title=The Four Nations: A History of the United Kingdom |date=2003-01-01 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-09374-2}}</ref> These articles were changed such that the previous claim over the whole island of Ireland became instead an aspiration towards creating a united Ireland by peaceful means, "with the consent of a majority of the people, democratically expressed, in both jurisdictions in the island" as part of the ] ending ], a violent conflict between ] and ] from 1969 to 1998. The Good Friday signatories "recognise the legitimacy of whatever choice is freely exercised by a majority of the people of Northern Ireland with regard to its status, whether they prefer to continue to support the Union with Great Britain or a sovereign united Ireland."<ref>{{cite report|author = Alan Whysall|title=A Northern Ireland Border Poll|url=https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/sites/constitution_unit/files/185_a_northern_ireland_border_poll_0.pdf|publisher=The Constitution Unit University College London|date=March 2019| page=4}}</ref><ref name="announcement1999">{{cite web|url=https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/dail/1999-12-02/2/|title=British-Irish Agreement: Announcement.|date=2 December 1999|work=Dáil Éireann debates|pages=Vol.512 No.2 p.3 cc.337–340|access-date=10 March 2020|archive-date=14 May 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180514170630/https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/dail/1999-12-02/2/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===North Korea=== | |||
In the context of ]'s and the United States non-recognition of the ] and what the North views as a 'hostile policy' pursued by the United States, the North's government frequently accuses the United States of denying the 'right of existence' of North Korea. For instance, a 2017 Foreign Ministry statement declared, "The DPRK will redouble the efforts to increase its strength to safeguard the country's sovereignty and right to existence." North Korea itself does not recognise the right of existence of the Republic of Korea in the south.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/north-korea-threatens-to-reduce-us-to-ashes/news-story/d735f25866cc4b089fad03865908dc91|title=Just what is North Korea up to now?|publisher=News.com.au|date=14 September 2017|last1=Killalea|first1=Debra|access-date=31 October 2017|archive-date=7 November 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171107052420/http://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/north-korea-threatens-to-reduce-us-to-ashes/news-story/d735f25866cc4b089fad03865908dc91|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Ukraine=== | |||
During the ], Russian government officials have denied ]'s right to exist. A few months before the ], Russian president ] published an essay "]", in which he claimed there is "no historical basis" for the "idea of Ukrainian people as a nation separate from the Russians".<ref name="Duben">Düben, B A. ". ''] Public Policy Review'', vol. 3, no. 1, 2023</ref> According to ], the essay is required reading for the ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Шойгу обязал военных изучить статью Путина об Украине |url=https://www.rbc.ru/politics/15/07/2021/60f0475d9a7947b61f09f4be |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220224043438/https://www.rbc.ru/politics/15/07/2021/60f0475d9a7947b61f09f4be |archive-date=2022-02-24 |access-date=2022-02-06 |website=РБК |date=15 July 2021 |language=ru}}</ref> Former president ] compared the essay to Hitler's ] speech.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Статья Путина не об истории. Это – политический манифест с угрозами соседям |trans-title=Putin's article is not about history. It is a political manifesto with threats to neighbors |url=https://20khvylyn.com/opinion/mind/opinion_25850.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220205181441/https://www.20khvylyn.com/opinion/mind/opinion_25850.html |archive-date=2022-02-05 |access-date=2022-02-06 |website=20 хвилин Украина |language=ru}}</ref> Thirty-five legal and genocide experts said the essay laid "the groundwork for incitement to genocide" by "denying the existence" of Ukrainians as a people.<ref>{{cite web |date=27 May 2022 |title=Independent Legal Analysis of the Russian Federation's Breaches of the Genocide Convention in Ukraine and the Duty to Prevent |url=https://newlinesinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/English-Report.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220616080955/https://newlinesinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/English-Report.pdf |archive-date=2022-06-16 |access-date=2022-07-22 |work=New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy; Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights}}</ref> In 2024, Putin called Ukraine "an artificial state".<ref name="Vock">{{cite news |last1=Vock |first1=Ido |title=Tucker Carlson interview: Fact-checking Putin's 'nonsense' history |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-68255302 |publisher=BBC News |date=9 February 2024}}</ref> | |||
], deputy chairman of the ] and former Russian president, commented that Putin outlined "why Ukraine did not exist, does not exist, and will not exist".<ref>{{cite news |title=What Did Putin Gain From Sitting Down With Tucker Carlson? |url=https://www.wsj.com/world/russia/what-did-putin-gain-from-sitting-down-with-tucker-carlson-895a2bfb |work=]|first=Matthew|last=Luxmoore|date=9 February 2024|access-date=23 February 2024}}</ref> He said that Ukraine should not exist in any form and that Russia will continue to wage war against any independent Ukrainian state.<ref>{{cite news |title=Putin Ally Says There's '100 Percent' Chance of Future Russia-Ukraine Wars |url=https://www.newsweek.com/putin-ally-says-theres-100-percent-chance-future-russia-ukraine-wars-1861639 |work=] |date=17 January 2024}}</ref> | |||
In June 2009 ] said "Israelis must acknowledge that just as Israel's right to exist cannot be denied, neither can Palestine's."<ref name="bbc- obama">{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8083107.stm |title=Middle East | Obama on Israeli-Palestinian 'stalemate' |publisher=BBC News |date=2009-06-04 |accessdate=2012-01-21}}</ref> | |||
==Citations== | ==Citations== | ||
*1791 ], '']'': "The fact therefore must be that the ''individuals themselves,'' each in his own personal and sovereign right, ''entered into a contract with each other'' to produce a government: and this is the only mode in which governments have a right to arise, and the only principle on which they have a |
*1791 ], '']'': "The fact therefore must be that the ''individuals themselves,'' each in his own personal and sovereign right, ''entered into a contract with each other'' to produce a government: and this is the only mode in which governments have a right to arise, and the only principle on which they have a right to exist."<ref>Paine, Thomas, (1791) '']''</ref> | ||
*1823 Sir ]: "Admitting, however, this |
*1823 Sir ]: "Admitting, however, this right to exist in the Greek people, it is a different question whether there is any right, much more any call, for the nations of Europe to interfere in their support."<ref name="google249"/> | ||
*1882 Ernest Renan, "What is a nation?": So long as this moral consciousness gives proof of its strength by the sacrifices which demand the abdication of the individual to the advantage of the community, it is legitimate and has the |
*1882 Ernest Renan, "What is a nation?": So long as this moral consciousness gives proof of its strength by the sacrifices which demand the abdication of the individual to the advantage of the community, it is legitimate and has the right to exist <nowiki>.<ref name="Renan"/> | ||
*1916 American Institute of International Law: "Every nation has the |
*1916 American Institute of International Law: "Every nation has the right to exist, and to protect and to conserve its existence."<ref>Root, Elihu, " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160315143240/http://www.jstor.org/stable/2187520 |date=2016-03-15 }}" ''The American Journal of International Law,'' Vol. 10, No. 2, (Apr. 1916), pp. 211–221.</ref> | ||
*1933 ]s all over Germany checking if people had voted on ] from the ] said "We do this because Germany's right to exist is now a question of to be or not to be."<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/1933/nov/13/secondworldwar.germany | location=London | work=The Guardian | title=All Germans rounded up to vote | date=8 March 2006 | access-date=17 December 2016 | archive-date=25 November 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161125003543/https://www.theguardian.com/world/1933/nov/13/secondworldwar.germany | url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
*1922 Cemal Paşa: "In a word, the want to make the Turkish race respected in the eyes of the world and secure its '''right to exist''' side by side with the other nations in the twentieth century."<ref>Paşa Cemal, '','' published by George H. Doran Company, 1922, p. 200</ref> | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
{{columns-list|colwidth=25em| | |||
* ] | |||
* |
*] | ||
* |
*] | ||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
* |
*] | ||
* |
*] | ||
* |
*] | ||
* |
*] | ||
* |
*] | ||
* |
*] | ||
* |
*] | ||
* |
*] | ||
}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{reflist |
{{reflist}} | ||
== Notes == | |||
{{Notelist}} | |||
== Further reading == | == Further reading == | ||
* ]: '']: A Moral Defense of Israel's Wars''. Doubleday, 2003. ISBN |
* ]: '']: A Moral Defense of Israel's Wars''. Doubleday, 2003. {{ISBN|0-385-50905-7}} | ||
* ]. '''', 1898 | * ]. '''', 1898 | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
* | * | ||
* , a presentation by ] ] (R-]) | * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170829081440/http://www.aish.com/jewishissues/middleeast/Israels_Right_to_the_Land.asp |date=29 August 2017 }}, a presentation by ] ] (R-]) | ||
* by David Meir-Levi. April 6, 2005 | |||
* Letter from ] to Prime Minister ], September 9, 1993 | |||
* | |||
* Catholic viewpoint | |||
* | * | ||
{{Group rights}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Right To Exist}} | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 18:26, 7 July 2024
Conceptual right of nations
The right to exist is said to be an attribute of nations. According to an essay by the 19th-century French philosopher Ernest Renan, a state has the right to exist when individuals are willing to sacrifice their own interests for the community it represents. Unlike self-determination, the right to exist is an attribute of states rather than of peoples. It is not a right recognized in international law. The phrase has featured prominently in the Arab–Israeli conflict since the 1950s.
The right to exist of a de facto state may be balanced against another state's right to territorial integrity. Proponents of the right to exist trace it back to the "right of existence", said to be a fundamental right of states recognized by writers on international law for hundreds of years.
Historical use
Thomas Paine (1737–1809) used the phrase "right to exist" to refer to forms of government, arguing that representative government has a right to exist, but that hereditary government does not. In 1823, Sir Walter Scott argued for the "right to exist in the Greek people". (The Greeks were then revolting against Turkish rule.) According to Renan's "What is a Nation?" (1882), "So long as this moral consciousness gives proof of its strength by the sacrifices which demand the abdication of the individual to the advantage of the community, it is legitimate and has the right to exist. If doubts arise regarding its frontiers, consult the populations in the areas under dispute." Existence is not a historical right, but "a daily plebiscite, just as an individual's existence is a perpetual affirmation of life," Renan said. The phrase gained enormous usage in reference to the breakup of the Ottoman Empire in 1918. "If Turkey has a right to exist – and the Powers are very prompt to assert that she has – she possesses an equally good right to defend herself against all attempts to imperil her political existence," wrote Eliakim and Robert Littell in 1903. In many cases, a nation's right to exist is not questioned, and is therefore not asserted.
Examples
Armenia
The right to exist of Armenia became known as the Armenian question during the Congress of Berlin in 1878, and would again be asked during the Armenian genocide in World War I.
Basque nation
Main article: Basque nationalismAccording to Basque nationalists, "Euzkadi (the name of our country in our own language) is the country of the Basques with as such right to exist independently as a nation as Poland or Ireland. The Basques are a very ancient people..."
Israel/Palestine
See also: International recognition of Israel and International recognition of the State of PalestineIn 1947, a United Nations General Assembly resolution provided for the creation of an "Arab State" and a "Jewish State" to exist within Palestine in the United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine. The Jewish Agency for Israel, precursor to the Israeli government, agreed to the plan, but the Palestinians rejected it and fighting broke out. After Israel's 14 May 1948 unilateral declaration of independence, support from neighboring Arab states escalated the 1947–48 Civil War in Mandatory Palestine into the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. The legal and territorial status of Israel and Palestine is still hotly disputed in the region and within the international community.
According to Ilan Pappé, Arab recognition of Israel's right to exist was part of Folke Bernadotte's 1948 peace plan. The Arab states gave this as their reason to reject the plan. In the 1950s UK MP Herbert Morrison cited then Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser as saying "Israel is an artificial State which must disappear." The issue was described as the central one between Israel and the Arabs.
After the June 1967 war, Egyptian spokesman Mohammed H. el-Zayyat stated that Cairo had accepted Israel's right to exist since the signing of the Egyptian–Israeli armistice in 1949. He added that this did not imply recognition of Israel. In September, the Arab leaders adopted a hardline "three nos" position in the Khartoum Resolution: No peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, and no negotiations with Israel. But in November, Egypt accepted UN Security Council Resolution 242, which implied acceptance of Israel's right to exist. At the same time, Nasser urged Yasser Arafat and other Palestinian leaders to reject the resolution. "You must be our irresponsible arm," he said. King Hussein of Jordan also acknowledged that Israel had a right to exist at this time. Meanwhile, Syria rejected Resolution 242, saying that it, "refers to Israel's right to exist and it ignores the right of the refugees to return to their homes."
Upon assuming the premiership in 1977, Menachem Begin spoke as follows: Our right to exist—have you ever heard of such a thing? Would it enter the mind of any Briton or Frenchman, Belgian or Dutchman, Hungarian or Bulgarian, Russian or American, to request for its people recognition of its right to exist? ... Mr. Speaker: From the Knesset of Israel, I say to the world, our very existence per se is our right to exist!
As reported by The New York Times, in 1988 Yasser Arafat declared that the Palestinians accepted United Nations Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338, which would guarantee "the right to exist in peace and security for all". In June 2009, US president Barack Obama said "Israelis must acknowledge that just as Israel's right to exist cannot be denied, neither can Palestine's."
In 1993, there was an official exchange of letters between Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and chairman Arafat, in which Arafat declared that "the PLO affirms that those articles of the Palestinian Covenant which deny Israel's right to exist, and the provisions of the Covenant which are inconsistent with the commitments of this letter are now inoperative and no longer valid."
In 2009 Prime Minister Ehud Olmert demanded the Palestinian Authority's acceptance of Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state, which the Palestinian Authority rejected. The Knesset plenum gave initial approval in May 2009 to a bill criminalising the public denial of Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state, with a penalty of up to a year in prison. In 2011 Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said in a speech to the Dutch Parliament that the Palestinian people recognise Israel's right to exist and they hope the Israeli government will respond by "recognizing the Palestinian state on the borders of the land occupied in 1967."
Israeli government ministers Naftali Bennett and Danny Danon have repeatedly rejected the creation of a Palestinian state, with Bennett stating "I will do everything in my power to make sure they never get a state." In June 2016 a poll showed that only 4 out of 20 Israeli ministers accepted the state of Palestine's right to exist.
John V. Whitbeck argued that Israel's insistence on a right to exist forces Palestinians to provide a moral justification for their own suffering. Noam Chomsky has argued that no state has the right to exist, that the concept was invented in the 1970s, and that Israel's right to exist cannot be accepted by the Palestinians.
International law scholar Anthony Carty observed in 2013 that "the question whether Israel has a legal right to exist might appear to be one of the most emotively charged in the vocabulary of international law and politics. It evokes immediately the 'exterminationist' rhetoric of numerous Arab and Islamic politicians and ideologues, not least the present President of Iran." (referring to then president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad)
Kurdistan
Representatives of the Kurdish people regularly assert their right to exist as a nation.
Northern Ireland
The 1937 Constitution of Ireland originally claimed the national territory consisted of the whole of the island in Articles 2 and 3, denying Northern Ireland's right to exist. These articles were changed such that the previous claim over the whole island of Ireland became instead an aspiration towards creating a united Ireland by peaceful means, "with the consent of a majority of the people, democratically expressed, in both jurisdictions in the island" as part of the Good Friday Agreement ending The Troubles, a violent conflict between Irish nationalists and Ulster unionists from 1969 to 1998. The Good Friday signatories "recognise the legitimacy of whatever choice is freely exercised by a majority of the people of Northern Ireland with regard to its status, whether they prefer to continue to support the Union with Great Britain or a sovereign united Ireland."
North Korea
In the context of South Korea's and the United States non-recognition of the North Korean state and what the North views as a 'hostile policy' pursued by the United States, the North's government frequently accuses the United States of denying the 'right of existence' of North Korea. For instance, a 2017 Foreign Ministry statement declared, "The DPRK will redouble the efforts to increase its strength to safeguard the country's sovereignty and right to existence." North Korea itself does not recognise the right of existence of the Republic of Korea in the south.
Ukraine
During the Russo-Ukrainian War, Russian government officials have denied Ukraine's right to exist. A few months before the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, Russian president Vladimir Putin published an essay "On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians", in which he claimed there is "no historical basis" for the "idea of Ukrainian people as a nation separate from the Russians". According to RBK Daily, the essay is required reading for the Russian military. Former president Petro Poroshenko compared the essay to Hitler's Sudetenland speech. Thirty-five legal and genocide experts said the essay laid "the groundwork for incitement to genocide" by "denying the existence" of Ukrainians as a people. In 2024, Putin called Ukraine "an artificial state".
Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of the Security Council of Russia and former Russian president, commented that Putin outlined "why Ukraine did not exist, does not exist, and will not exist". He said that Ukraine should not exist in any form and that Russia will continue to wage war against any independent Ukrainian state.
Citations
- 1791 Thomas Paine, Rights of Man: "The fact therefore must be that the individuals themselves, each in his own personal and sovereign right, entered into a contract with each other to produce a government: and this is the only mode in which governments have a right to arise, and the only principle on which they have a right to exist."
- 1823 Sir Walter Scott: "Admitting, however, this right to exist in the Greek people, it is a different question whether there is any right, much more any call, for the nations of Europe to interfere in their support."
- 1882 Ernest Renan, "What is a nation?": So long as this moral consciousness gives proof of its strength by the sacrifices which demand the abdication of the individual to the advantage of the community, it is legitimate and has the right to exist .
- 1916 American Institute of International Law: "Every nation has the right to exist, and to protect and to conserve its existence."
- 1933 Nazis all over Germany checking if people had voted on withdrawal from the League of Nations said "We do this because Germany's right to exist is now a question of to be or not to be."
See also
- Diplomatic recognition
- Existence
- Legitimacy
- Nation state
- Nationalism
- Self-defence
- Self-determination
- Sovereign state
- Sovereignty
- Special Committee on Decolonization
- Territorial integrity
References
- Lagerwall, Anne. "The Paradoxical Protection of State's Territorial Integrity by the United Nations: Law versus Power? ", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Law and Society Association, Hilton Bonaventure, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 27 May 2008.
- Oppenheim, Lassa and Ronald Roxburgh, (2005) International Law Archived 5 January 2020 at the Wayback Machine, p. 192–193.
- Paine, Thomas, "Dissertation on the First Principles of Government" (1795), The Life and Works of Thomas Paine, 5:221--25.
- ^ Scott, Walter, "The Greek Revolution Archived 2022-03-20 at the Wayback Machine", Edinburgh Annual Register of 1823, p. 249.
- ^ Renan, Ernest, "What is a Nation? Archived 2013-03-19 at the Wayback Machine", 1882.
- Littell, Eliakim and Robert S. Littell, "The Reign of Terror in Macedonia", The Living Age, April–June 1903, p. 68.
- John Riddell (2014). To the Masses: Proceedings of the Third Congress of the Communist International, 1921. Brill Academic. p. 28. ISBN 978-90-04-28803-4. Archived from the original on 5 April 2022. Retrieved 14 April 2015.
- Nationalism, Naunihal Singh, Mittal Publications, 2006, p. 111.
- ^ Ilan Pappé, The Making of the Arab–Israeli Conflict, 1947–1951 Archived 29 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine, I.B.Tauris, 1994, p. 149.
- *"Foreign Affairs; A Time to Find a Solution for Palestine", The New York Times 2 August 1958. "Most Arab leaders do not even dare admit Israel's right to exist. They fear assassination by fanatics."
*Parliamentary debates: Official report: Volume 547 (1956), Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons: "I will give two short quotations, one from Colonel Nasser, the Prime Minister of Egypt, on 8th May, 1954. It is an extremist point of view based on the belief and the assertion that Israel has no right to exist at all."
*"Arms and the Middle East", Toledo Blade, 30 September 1955. "the Arabs still refuse to acknowledge Israel's right to exist." - "And underlying all of the questions dividing Israel and its Arab neighbors, one issue is central: Does Israel have a right to exist?" (Farrell, James Thomas, It has come to pass Archived 5 January 2020 at the Wayback Machine, 1958)
- ^ Whetten, Lawrence L. (1974). The Canal War: Four-Power Conflict in the Middle East. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. p. 51. ISBN 0-262-23069-0.
- "Khartoum Resolution". Council on Foreign Relations. Archived from the original on 20 May 2012. Retrieved 7 June 2012.
The Khartoum Resolution passed by the Arab League in the wake of the 1967 war is famous for the "Three Nos" articulated in the third paragraph: No peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, and no negotiations with Israel.
- Alexander, Anne, Nasser, p. 150. ISBN 1-904341-83-7.
- Dennon, Leon, "Key to Peace in Mideast", Owosso Argus-Press, 25 November 1967.
- Lukacs, Yehuda, Israel, Jordan, and the Peace Process Archived 5 January 2020 at the Wayback Machine, 1999. Syracuse University Press, pp. 98–99.
- "Statement to the Knesset by Prime Minister Begin upon the presentation of his government, June 20, 1977 Archived 29 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine", Volumes 4–5: 1977–1979, Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
- Paul Lewis (14 December 1988). "Arafat, In Geneva, Calls on Israelis To Join in Talks". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 6 January 2016. Retrieved 12 October 2012.
- "Middle East | Obama on Israeli-Palestinian 'stalemate'". BBC News. 4 June 2009. Archived from the original on 25 December 2015. Retrieved 21 January 2012.
- "You are being redirected..." archive.adl.org. Archived from the original on 1 May 2017. Retrieved 22 May 2017.
- "Olmert to Demand PA Accept Israel as Jewish State". Israel National News. 11 November 2007. Archived from the original on 13 March 2009. Retrieved 29 April 2009.
- Shragai, Nadav, "Knesset okays initial bill to outlaw denial of 'Jewish state' Archived 2009-05-30 at the Wayback Machine", Haaretz, 30 May 2009.
- 'We recognize Israel, they should recognize Palestine' Archived 22 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine. JPost, 30 June 2011.
- David Remnick (21 January 2013), The settlers move to annex the West Bank—and Israeli politics. Archived 1 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine The New Yorker
- Azulay, Moran (28 October 2013). "Bennett: Palestinian state a mistake, will work against it". Ynetnews. Archived from the original on 23 November 2013. Retrieved 23 November 2013.
- Haaretz (27 June 2016). "Only Four of 20 Israeli Ministers Openly Declare Support of Two-state Solution". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 3 January 2017. Retrieved 1 January 2017.
- Whitbeck, John V. (2 February 2007). "What 'Israel's right to exist' means to Palestinians". The Christian Science Monitor. Archived from the original on 8 March 2009. Retrieved 27 May 2009.
- On the Future of Democracy Noam Chomsky interviewed by John P. Titlow Archived 24 May 2018 at the Wayback Machine, Dragonfire, June 2005
- Carty, Anthony (January 2013). "Israel's Legal Right to Exist and the Principle of the Self-determination of the Palestinian People?" (PDF). The Modern Law Review. 76 (1): 158–177. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12007. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 December 2021. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
- Official report of debates Authors Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe, Council of Europe, Council of Europe, 1994, p. 747.
- Democracy and Human Rights in Multicultural Societies, Matthias Koenig, Paul F. A. Guchteneire, Unesco, Ashgate Publishing, 2007, p. 95.
- Homeward Bound; KURDISTAN: In the Shadow of History. By Susan Meiselas, Random House, 1997, reviewed by Christopher Hitchens, Los Angeles Times, 7 December 1997.
- Welsh, Frank (1 January 2003). The Four Nations: A History of the United Kingdom. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-09374-2.
- Alan Whysall (March 2019). A Northern Ireland Border Poll (PDF) (Report). The Constitution Unit University College London. p. 4.
- "British-Irish Agreement: Announcement". Dáil Éireann debates. 2 December 1999. pp. Vol.512 No.2 p.3 cc.337–340. Archived from the original on 14 May 2018. Retrieved 10 March 2020.
- Killalea, Debra (14 September 2017). "Just what is North Korea up to now?". News.com.au. Archived from the original on 7 November 2017. Retrieved 31 October 2017.
- Düben, B A. "Revising History and ‘Gathering the Russian Lands’: Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian Nationhood". LSE Public Policy Review, vol. 3, no. 1, 2023
- "Шойгу обязал военных изучить статью Путина об Украине". РБК (in Russian). 15 July 2021. Archived from the original on 24 February 2022. Retrieved 6 February 2022.
- "Статья Путина не об истории. Это – политический манифест с угрозами соседям" [Putin's article is not about history. It is a political manifesto with threats to neighbors]. 20 хвилин Украина (in Russian). Archived from the original on 5 February 2022. Retrieved 6 February 2022.
- "Independent Legal Analysis of the Russian Federation's Breaches of the Genocide Convention in Ukraine and the Duty to Prevent" (PDF). New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy; Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights. 27 May 2022. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 June 2022. Retrieved 22 July 2022.
- Vock, Ido (9 February 2024). "Tucker Carlson interview: Fact-checking Putin's 'nonsense' history". BBC News.
- Luxmoore, Matthew (9 February 2024). "What Did Putin Gain From Sitting Down With Tucker Carlson?". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
- "Putin Ally Says There's '100 Percent' Chance of Future Russia-Ukraine Wars". Newsweek. 17 January 2024.
- Paine, Thomas, (1791) The Rights of Man
- Root, Elihu, "The Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Nations Adopted by the American Institute of International Law Archived 2016-03-15 at the Wayback Machine" The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 10, No. 2, (Apr. 1916), pp. 211–221.
- "All Germans rounded up to vote". The Guardian. London. 8 March 2006. Archived from the original on 25 November 2016. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
Notes
Further reading
- Yaacov Lozowick: Right to Exist: A Moral Defense of Israel's Wars. Doubleday, 2003. ISBN 0-385-50905-7
- Sholom Aleichem. Why Do the Jews Need a Land of Their own?, 1898
External links
- Does Israel have a right to exist?
- Israel's Right to the Land Archived 29 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine, a presentation by U.S. Senator James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma)
- From the father of Daniel Pearl
Various group rights | |
---|---|
National rights | |
Rights of other entities |