| Revision as of 21:04, 18 June 2012 editGrizzly1110 (talk | contribs)468 edits →hey← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:38, 4 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (97 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| __TOC__ | |||
| {{CVU|academy=yes}} | |||
| {{archive box|search=yes|auto=long}} | |||
| == |
== Capitals == | ||
| @Riley specifically, but since CVUA related I'll put it here... | |||
| Hi! My student already has rollback, and wants to learn Huggle and Igloo. Can you please get him an instructor that can teach him these? Thanks, ] (]) 22:45, 13 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| You changed it to read '''Find a previous application''' instead of '''Find a Previous Application'''. I had it in title case as it ''was'' a title... Hmmm. I think it looks a wee bit odd without the caps, but... enlighten me if there's something I'm missing (as there often is) {{wink}} '''] '''<sub><small>]</small></sub> 17:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| ::Ahahah sorry, now that I look at it non-capitals is even more ugly.. gaah. Well you said to enlighted you, so "Knock Knock" Cheers, ] <small><sub>]</sub> ''No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here.''</small> 17:10, 18 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==WT pages== | |||
| :::Hehe. (graphic designer to the '''rescue'''! jk) '''] '''<sub><small>]</small></sub> 17:22, 18 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Vandalism! == | |||
| These WT pages are so gosh-darn convoluted. Can we not merge them together somehow, into one mega page, possibly with sections for different topics? It's just quite annoying to have all these pages scattered who knows where --> Dan, as the new co-leader (XD JK - ah, the responsibility) of this clan, can you get on that? :) <big>'''] '''</font></big><sub><small>]</sup></sup></small> 23:31, 13 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :There are only three talk pages the "mega" one ], this one and the status one. I think you're getting the impression that they are scattered because everyones talk especially Acho's has a least one CVU topic on it. I think as "clan" <!--since when were we a clan???--> co-leader we all need to work to putting CVU topics on cvu pages (only three of them) and staying off peoples talks unless it deals directly with them. ] (]) 00:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Will do, chief. And that's exactly what I mean.. the User Talk pages. Would it be wise for you and Acho to add an alert (like the "The purpose of this page.." yadda-yadda at the top of this one when in edit view) to the edit view of your talk pages reminding users of the fact? <big>'''] '''</font></big><sub><small>]</sup></sup></small> 00:10, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ::::<sub>(bratty voice)</sub> Well SA-REE. .... JK Honestly, I actually don't like them either. But they may serve a purpose.. we'll see what Achowat thinks. (cue ] music) <big>'''] '''</font></big><sub><small>]</sup></sup></small> 00:20, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ::: |
||
| ::::::?? --- Whatchu be talkin' bout? .... We were discussing whether or not to add an alert to those editing '''your or Dan's''' talk pages that if their edits are CVUA related, they should be added to ]. And, since it just involved y'all two (as the leaders or what have you of this group), Dan just posed the question to you. <big>'''] '''</font></big><sub><small>]</sup></sup></small> 04:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::All Acho is saying is that if we just posted to project talk pages we wouldn't have to have this discussion and I don't think Acho wants an edit notice. | |||
| :::::::'''Conclusion''' Unless your concern relates directly to the user, post whatever it is to a project talk page. (gavel banged) ] (]) 15:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| I've coincidentially 'reverted' a Vandal's attempt to vandalize ] from what it looks like on the page history. The user has an anonymous IP username. --] (]) 18:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Fishingking == | |||
| Can we get anyone to take up Fishingking? He's already a rollbacker and would like more training with the tool. ] (]) 19:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Proposal - introducing an new template for completed applications== | |||
| == hey == | |||
| {{Template:Admin help}} | |||
| {{Template:Admin help}} | |||
| I Have A proble with My Instructor, Riley Huntley, He claims he is extremly busy and he has contacted me but he won't start training me. | |||
| ] (]) 18:32, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Do you still believe that one-on-one tutoring is necessary? It seems like you were just having some problems loading Twinkle. If that's the case, perhaps asking a question at the ] will be an easier way to get the answers you seek. If one-on-one is still necessary, we can do our best to find you an Instructor. ] (]) 19:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::I meant that I am extremely busy at the moment/today. I have already started training with you, but I will not accept you as a student if you continue to write improperly, please see ] and follow the instructions. Please do not take this offensively but if you can't learn to type properly, how will administrators trust you to revert rollback rights properly? | |||
| ::Cheers,<br />] <small><span style="color:#555;">()</span></small> 19:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::Riley, before you bitch about someone else's writing look above and see "I am extremly at the moment. ] (]) 19:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Dan, please watch your language, as I said above I did/do not mean offensive by bringing up his writing but it is for his own good and he could be more help to new users. For example, or . | |||
| ::::Cheers,<br />] <small><span style="color:#555;">()</span></small> 19:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::First, ]. Second, I am in disbelief about this: "did not mean offensive". I think you meant offense, but I don't know how administrators could trust you to rollback vandalism properly. In essence, don't throw stones when you live in a glass house. ] (]) 19:37, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| I was thinking that it may be worth replacing the currently-used <nowiki>{{already done}}</nowiki> with an <nowiki>{{processed}}</nowiki> tag instead. The reason is if someone who is turned down sees "already done" may make them think they have been accepted. Comments? ] (]) 15:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Dan, you are blowing this out of proportion. It is not like I am threatening to report him to administrators for not using capitals properly (I would never do that), I was just stating my personal standards and that he would need to follow them if he wished to be trained by me. Can we drop this conversation? Thanks. | |||
| :I find no evidence of a {{t|processed}} being a thing. I'm a little confused at this suggestion. (Not that I don't like it). ] (]) 15:35, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Cheers,<br />] <small><span style="color:#555;">()</span></small> 19:46, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :: |
::I was thinking more along the lines of creating a new tag - I forgot to add that into the above text. ] (]) 15:50, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | :::Why not just use ] for ] '''Resolved'''? ] (]) 15:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| Don't Drop it Riley's being a Jerk Because When I asked for a new Instructor he decided he Does not need to mind his own buisness and he had to be a jerk about it and said yes, get him a different instructor which means he Hates me. And Dan You were not blowing it out of proportion. He Does not deserve to be an instructor. Or Part of the unit. In Fact He claims hes trying to stop vandalism when He himself could be a Vandal himself. He Stalks me, He worries about my conversations, He Does not mind his own buisness. <big>!!! He is A suckup like this one girl who happend to have a crush on me at my elementary school. He thinks always needs to follow to rules. He thinks he needs to play It by the guidelines. He's a Jerky, Knowitall, Suckup. | |||
| ] (]) |
::::Looks good, now just needs support.. ] (]) 16:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :::::I support the idea of {{Resolved1}} -- Cheers, ] <small>] ''No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here.''</small> 17:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::I would like to inform you that an administrator will soon be apart of this conversation because you have just made a personal attack. As your instructor, it was my job to reward you when you deserved it (which I did) and clean up your mess when you made mistakes (which I did), in no way was I stalking you or anything else. Also, most of the time your bad edits came up in Huggle, I barely went through your contributions. Cheers,<br />] <small><span style="color:#555;">()</span></small> 20:52, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ::::::I like it. ] (]) 17:36, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| {{outdent}} Currently at ]. Any suggestions on where to put it - ] is already taken. ] (]) 18:06, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :I think Riley built {{t|resolved1}} for us. ] (]) 18:19, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ::I was bold and changed the bot to resolved1. Just a FYI. ] (]) 18:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :::Just finished the /doc page - I think we can say: {{resolved1}} ] (]) 19:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Why "resolved" rather than a more descriptive phrase, like "Taken by Instructor"? Just, as we are already creating our own special template for this, why not make it as descriptive as possible given the CVUA circumstances? Hmm.. '''] '''<sub><small>]</small></sub> 19:59, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Because the idea is to have one template that can be used for either accepted or rejected students that doesn't make it seem like the candidate is necessarily accepted. ] (]) 20:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Ah, right. <unclear on the concept> '''] '''<sub><small>]</small></sub> 20:06, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Silvrous == | ||
| I would like A new instructor because my old one, ] keeps stalking me, wont train me, Joins in my conversations and keeps critizing me because I did this or I did that. And Can you make sure my new instructor will help me use Twinkle. Thanks- | |||
| ] (]) |
] ] (]) 14:31, 16 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::Yes, please get him a new instructor, also, Grizzly check my talk page to see why I reverted your edit when you blanked that page, I do not have time to place a talk back message. Cheers,<br />] <small><span style="color:#555;">()</span></small> 20:20, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:38, 4 February 2023
 Archives | |
|
|
Capitals
@Riley specifically, but since CVUA related I'll put it here...
You changed it to read Find a previous application instead of Find a Previous Application. I had it in title case as it was a title... Hmmm. I think it looks a wee bit odd without the caps, but... enlighten me if there's something I'm missing (as there often is) 
Theopolisme TALK 17:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- Ahahah sorry, now that I look at it non-capitals is even more ugly.. gaah. Well you said to enlighted you, so "Knock Knock" Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 17:10, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hehe. (graphic designer to the rescue! jk) Theopolisme TALK 17:22, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- Ahahah sorry, now that I look at it non-capitals is even more ugly.. gaah. Well you said to enlighted you, so "Knock Knock" Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 17:10, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Vandalism!
I've coincidentially 'reverted' a Vandal's attempt to vandalize History of WWE from what it looks like on the page history. The user has an anonymous IP username. --Jayemd (talk) 18:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Proposal - introducing an new template for completed applications
I was thinking that it may be worth replacing the currently-used {{already done}} with an {{processed}} tag instead. The reason is if someone who is turned down sees "already done" may make them think they have been accepted. Comments? Mdann52 (talk) 15:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- I find no evidence of a {{processed}} being a thing. I'm a little confused at this suggestion. (Not that I don't like it). Achowat (talk) 15:35, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- I was thinking more along the lines of creating a new tag - I forgot to add that into the above text. Mdann52 (talk) 15:50, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Why not just use Image:U2713.svg for
Resolved? Achowat (talk) 15:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good, now just needs support.. Mdann52 (talk) 16:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- I support the idea of
Resolved -- Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 17:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- I like it. Dan653 (talk) 17:36, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- I support the idea of
- Looks good, now just needs support.. Mdann52 (talk) 16:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Why not just use Image:U2713.svg for
- I was thinking more along the lines of creating a new tag - I forgot to add that into the above text. Mdann52 (talk) 15:50, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Currently at User:Mdann52/resolved. Any suggestions on where to put it - template:resolved is already taken. Mdann52 (talk) 18:06, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think Riley built {{resolved1}} for us. Achowat (talk) 18:19, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- I was bold and changed the bot to resolved1. Just a FYI. Dan653 (talk) 18:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Just finished the /doc page - I think we can say: Resolved Mdann52 (talk) 19:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Why "resolved" rather than a more descriptive phrase, like "Taken by Instructor"? Just, as we are already creating our own special template for this, why not make it as descriptive as possible given the CVUA circumstances? Hmm.. Theopolisme TALK 19:59, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Because the idea is to have one template that can be used for either accepted or rejected students that doesn't make it seem like the candidate is necessarily accepted. Achowat (talk) 20:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, right. <unclear on the concept> Theopolisme TALK 20:06, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Because the idea is to have one template that can be used for either accepted or rejected students that doesn't make it seem like the candidate is necessarily accepted. Achowat (talk) 20:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Why "resolved" rather than a more descriptive phrase, like "Taken by Instructor"? Just, as we are already creating our own special template for this, why not make it as descriptive as possible given the CVUA circumstances? Hmm.. Theopolisme TALK 19:59, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Just finished the /doc page - I think we can say:
- I was bold and changed the bot to resolved1. Just a FYI. Dan653 (talk) 18:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Silvrous
Wikipedia_talk:Counter-Vandalism_Unit/Academy#Inactive_instructor Dan653 (talk) 14:31, 16 September 2012 (UTC)