Revision as of 12:33, 27 June 2012 view sourceElockid (talk | contribs)42,430 edits Undid revision 499588726 by 210.2.134.36 (talk) not even in the same category← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:27, 12 January 2025 view source Citation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,442,569 edits Altered title. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Dominic3203 | Category:Index numbers | #UCB_Category 9/41 | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Use |
{{Use American English|date=January 2024}} | ||
{{short description|City important to the world economy}} | |||
{{Redirect|World city}} | |||
{{Redirect|World city|hypothetical planetwide cities|Ecumenopolis|other uses|World city (disambiguation)}} | |||
<!-- | |||
{{pp-protected|small=y}} | |||
NOTE BEFORE EDITING: | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2024}} | |||
<!--NOTE BEFORE EDITING: | |||
In order to uphold ], any ranking of cities of comparison between cities included in this article must be referenced (WP:NOR), by a reliable source (WP:VERIFY), and not simply reflect or advertise individual users' opinions (WP:NOT). | In order to uphold ], any ranking of cities of comparison between cities included in this article must be referenced (WP:NOR), by a reliable source (WP:VERIFY), and not simply reflect or advertise individual users' opinions (WP:NOT). | ||
--> | --> | ||
{{multiple image | |||
A '''global city''' (also called '''world city''' or sometimes '''alpha city''' or '''world center''') is a ] generally considered to be an important node in the ]. The concept comes from ] and ] and rests on the idea that ] can be understood as largely created, facilitated, and enacted in strategic geographic locales according to a hierarchy of importance to the operation of the global system of finance and trade. | |||
| align = right | |||
| direction = vertical | |||
| image1 = View of Empire State Building from Rockefeller Center New York City dllu (cropped).jpg | |||
| width1 = 300 | |||
| caption1 = | |||
| image2 = London Skyline (125508655).jpeg | |||
| width2 = 300 | |||
| caption2 = ] (top) and ] (bottom) are the only two cities ranked in the ] by the ]. ] are considered leading ], commercial and cultural centers. | |||
}} | |||
A '''global city'''{{efn|Also known as a '''power city''', '''world city''', '''alpha city''', or '''world center'''}} is a ] that serves as a primary node in the ] The concept originates from ] and ], based on the thesis that ] has created a hierarchy of strategic ] with varying degrees of influence over ], ], and ] worldwide.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lenormand |first1=Maxime |last2=Gonçalves |first2=Bruno |last3=Tugores |first3=Antònia |last4=Ramasco |first4=José J. |title=Human diffusion and city influence |journal=] |date=2015 |volume=12 |issue=109 |pages=20150473 |doi=10.1098/rsif.2015.0473 |pmid=26179991 |pmc=4535413 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lin |first1=Jan |title=World Cities |journal=The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization |date=2012 |doi=10.1002/9780470670590.wbeog820 |isbn=9780470670590}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Pain |first1=Kathy |title=World Cities |journal=International Encyclopedia of Geography |date=2017 |pages=1–9 |doi=10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0525 |isbn=9781118786352}}</ref> The global city represents the most complex and significant hub within the international system, characterized by links binding it to other cities that have direct, tangible effects on global ] affairs.<ref name="Sass1">{{cite magazine |issue=503 |last1=Sassen |first1=Saskia |url=http://www.india-seminar.com/2001/503/503%20saskia%20sassen.htm |title=The global city: strategic site/new frontier |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061018200419/http://www.india-seminar.com/2001/503/503%20saskia%20sassen.htm |archive-date=18 October 2006 |date= July 2001 |magazine=Seminar Magazine |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
The criteria of a global city vary depending on the source.<ref>{{Cite web |title=global city |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/global-city |access-date=2022-10-20 |website=Britannica |language=en |archive-date=20 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221020155031/https://www.britannica.com/topic/global-city |url-status=live }}</ref> Common features include a high degree of ], a large population, the presence of major ], a significant and globalized ], a well-developed and internationally linked ], local or national economic dominance, high quality educational and ], and a globally influential output of ideas, innovations, or cultural products. Quintessential examples, based on most indices and research, include ], ], ], and ]. | |||
The most complex of these entities is the global city, whereby the linkages binding a city have a direct and tangible effect on global affairs through ] means.<ref name="Sass1">] - ''''</ref> The use of global city, as opposed to ], was popularized by ] ] in her 1991 work, ''The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo''<ref>Sassen, Saskia - '''' (1991) - ]. ISBN 0-691-07063-6</ref> though the term world city to describe cities that control a disproportionate amount of global business dates to at least the May 1886 description of ] by the ''Illustrated London News''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/review/737 |title=UK History |publisher=History.ac.uk |date=18 December 2009 |accessdate= 9 May 2012}}</ref> ] also used the term world city later in 1915.<ref name="Doel and Hubbard">Doel, M. & Hubbard, P., (2002), "Taking World Cities Literally: Marketing the City in a Global Space of flows", ''City'', vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 351-368. Subscription required</ref> Cities can fall from such categorization, as in the case of cities that have become less ] and less internationally renowned in the current era, e.g., ], ]; ], ]; and ], ]. | |||
==Origin and terminology== | |||
== Criteria == | |||
The term 'global city' was popularized by ] ] in her 1991 book, ''The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo''.<ref>Sassen, Saskia. ''''. 1991. ]. {{ISBN|0-691-07063-6}}. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150316103717/http://pup.princeton.edu/titles/6943.html|date=16 March 2015}}.</ref> Before then, other terms were used for urban centers with roughly the same features. The term 'world city', meaning a city heavily involved in global trade, appeared in a May 1886 description of ], by '']'';<ref>{{cite web |date=18 December 2009 |title=The Empire in One City? Liverpool's Inconvenient Imperial Past |url=http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/review/737 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120623124607/http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/review/737 |archive-date=23 June 2012 |access-date=9 May 2012 |publisher=Reviews in History |first1=John |last1=Belchem }}</ref> British sociologist and ] ] used the term in 1915.<ref name="Doel and Hubbard">Doel, M., & Hubbard, P., (2002), "Taking World Cities Literally: Marketing the City in a Global Space of flows", ''City'', vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 351–368. Subscription required.</ref> The term ']' entered common use in the late 19th or early 20th century, the earliest known example being a publication by the ] in 1904.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-1ALAAAAYAAJ&q=megacity |title=Hemisfile: Perspectives on Political and Economic Trends in the Americas |date=1994 |publisher=Institute of the Americas |language=en}}</ref> In the 21st century, the terms are usually focused on a city's ] and ] infrastructure.<ref>{{cite news |date=15 February 2015 |title=Asian Cities Pay Hidden Price for Global Status |work=The Diplomat |url=https://thediplomat.com/2015/02/asian-cities-pay-hidden-price-for-global-status/ |url-status=live |access-date=25 January 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160201130228/https://thediplomat.com/2015/02/asian-cities-pay-hidden-price-for-global-status/ |archive-date=1 February 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date=14 August 2014 |title=The World's Most Influential Cities |work=Forbes |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/joelkotkin/2014/08/14/the-most-influential-cities-in-the-world/#7bbf56cb7370 |url-status=live |access-date=29 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170905084618/https://www.forbes.com/sites/joelkotkin/2014/08/14/the-most-influential-cities-in-the-world#7bbf56cb7370 |archive-date=5 September 2017}}</ref> | |||
<!---Only one picture per subsection to prevent image crowding---> | |||
==Criteria== | |||
Global city status is considered to be beneficial and desired, and because of this many groups have tried to classify and rank which cities are seen as ''world cities'' or ''non-world cities''.<ref name="Doel and Hubbard" /> Although there is a consensus upon leading world cities,<ref name="GaWC 5">, GaWC, ], 28 July 1999</ref> the criteria upon which a classification is made can affect which other cities are included.<ref name="Doel and Hubbard" /> The criteria for identification tend either to be based on a ''yardstick value'' (e.g., if the producer-service sector is the largest | |||
], the core area of ], an Alpha++ global city, where there are several characteristic elements of global cities<ref>{{Cite web |title=What are the characteristics of world cities and megacities, and how has their distribution changed since 1950? – HBK Portal |url=https://hbkportal.co.uk/index.php/geography/urbanfutures2/ |access-date=2022-11-17 |language=en-GB |archive-date=17 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221117203257/https://hbkportal.co.uk/index.php/geography/urbanfutures2/ |url-status=live }}</ref> like worldwide influential economic (]) and cultural (]) centers, headquarters of international political organizations (]), world renowned museums (], ], ]), and worldwide-known landmarks (], ], ])]] | |||
sector then city X is a world city)<ref name="Doel and Hubbard" /> or on an ''imminent determination'' (if the producer-service sector of city X is greater than the combined producer-service sectors of N other cities then city X is a world city.)<ref name="Doel and Hubbard" /> | |||
Competing groups have devised competing means to classify and rank world cities and to distinguish them from other cities.<ref name="Doel and Hubbard" /> Although there is a consensus on the leading world cities,<ref name="GaWC 5"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110808022750/http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/rb/rb5.html |date=8 August 2011 }}, GaWC, ], 28 July 1999</ref> the chosen criteria affect which other cities are included.<ref name="Doel and Hubbard" /> Selection criteria may be based on a yardstick value (e.g., if the producer-service sector is the largest sector then city {{var|X}} is a world city)<ref name="Doel and Hubbard" /> or on an imminent determination (if the producer-service sector of city {{var|X}} is greater than the combined producer-service sectors of {{var|N}} other cities then city {{var|X}} is a world city.)<ref name="Doel and Hubbard" /> Although criteria are variable and fluid, typical characteristics of world cities include:<ref>Pashley, Rosemary. "HSC Geography". Pascal Press, 2000, p.164</ref> | |||
=== Economic characteristics === | |||
* The most prominent criterion has been providing a variety of ],<ref>J.V. Beaverstock, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060308055423/http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/rb/rb179.html |date=8 March 2006}}, GaWC, Loughborough University, 29 September 2010</ref> notably in ], ], ], and ]; and their amalgamation of financial headquarters, a ], and other major financial institutions, | |||
* ] of numerous ], | |||
* Domination of the trade and economy of a large surrounding area, | |||
* Major manufacturing centers with ] and ] facilities, | |||
* Considerable ] daily and at a global level, | |||
* Centers of new ideas and ] in business, economics, and culture, | |||
* Centers of ] and other media and communications for ], | |||
* The dominance of the national region with great international significance, | |||
* The high percentage of residents employed in the ] and ], | |||
* High-quality educational institutions, including renowned universities and ] facilities; and attracting international student attendance,<ref>K. O'Connor, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060205103720/http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/rb/rb161.html |date=5 February 2006 }}, GaWC, Loughborough University, 17 February 2005</ref> | |||
* Multi-functional ] offering some of the best legal, medical, and entertainment facilities in the country, | |||
* High diversity in language, culture, religion, and ideologies. | |||
==General rankings== | |||
<!---Only one picture per subsection to prevent image crowding---> | |||
Global city rankings are numerous.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.jll.co.uk/en/trends-and-insights/research/decoding-city-performance|title=Decoding City Performance|website=Jll.co.uk|date=2 April 2019 |language=en|access-date=16 October 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191016212712/https://www.jll.co.uk/en/trends-and-insights/research/decoding-city-performance|archive-date=16 October 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> ], ], ], and ] are the most commonly mentioned.<ref>{{cite web |title=Struggling Giants |url=https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/struggling-giants |publisher=University of Minnesota Press |access-date=31 December 2020 |language=en |archive-date=17 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210117230114/https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/struggling-giants |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Abrahamson |first1=Mark |title=Global cities |date=2004 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn=978-0195142044 |page=4 |edition=1st |url=http://faculty.tamuc.edu/jsun/global%20cities.pdf |access-date=9 January 2021 |archive-date=11 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210111074627/http://faculty.tamuc.edu/jsun/global%20cities.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
===GaWC World Cities=== | |||
], ]]] | |||
{{Main article|Globalization and World Cities Research Network}} | |||
{{Excerpt|Globalization and World Cities Research Network|inline=yes}} The cities in the top two classifications in the 2024 edition are:<ref>{{Cite web |title=World Cities 2024 |url=https://gawc.lboro.ac.uk/gawc-worlds/the-world-according-to-gawc/world-cities-2024/ |access-date=2024-11-01 |website=GaWC |language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
====Alpha ++==== | |||
* Serve as the ] ] sites for ]s, international ]s, ]s, ], and ]s that influence the world ] | |||
* Contribute significant financial capacity/output to the city's, region's, or even nation's<ref>{{PDFlink||61.6 KB}}, "World Resources 1998-99", '']'', 1998.</ref> ]<ref>'' ''(data sets in .ZIP)'', ]</ref> | |||
* House the major ] indices<ref>, '']''</ref>/market capitalisation | |||
* Provide a variety of international financial services,<ref>J.V. Beaverstock, , GaWC, ], 29 September 2010</ref> notably in the ], ], ], and ] | |||
* Appear near the top of ]<ref name="living">, '']'', 12 July 2011</ref> lists and have significant agglomerations of personal wealth, e.g. in the number of billionaires residing within the city<ref name="billionaires" /> | |||
=== Political characteristics === | |||
<!---Only one picture per subsection to prevent image crowding---> | |||
], ]]] | |||
* Active influence on and participation in international events and world affairs; for example, ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ] are capitals of influential nations. | |||
* Hosting headquarters for ]s such as the ], ], or the ]. | |||
* A large ], population of the municipality (the centre of a ], typically several million) or ] | |||
* Diverse demographic constituencies<ref name="chap5">{{PDFlink||352 KB}}, "2004 ]" (page 99), '']'', 2004</ref> based on various indicators:<ref>{{PDFlink||196 KB}}, "World Resources 1998-99", '']'', 1998</ref> population, habitat,<ref>, '']''</ref> mobility,<ref>{{PDFlink||1.59 MB}}, '']''</ref> and ]<ref>{{PDFlink||3.73 MB}}, '']'', 2004</ref> | |||
* Quality of life standards<ref>, '']'', 10 April 2006</ref> or city development<ref>{{PDFlink|}}, "THE STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES REPORT 2001", '']'', 21 June 2006</ref> | |||
* ] communities | |||
=== Cultural characteristics === | |||
], ]]] | |||
* International, first-name familiarity. Cities such as ], ], ], ], and ] are commonly referred to without needing to specify their country. | |||
* Renowned cultural institutions (often with high endowments), such as ], ], ], ], notable ] and theatre centres. A lively cultural scene, including ]s (such as the ]), premieres, a thriving ] scene, nightlife, an ], ], street performers, and annual parades.{{Citation needed|date=August 2011}} | |||
* Several influential media outlets with an international reach, such as the ], ], '']'', or ].{{Citation needed|date=August 2011}} | |||
* A strong ]ing community, including major sports facilities, home teams in major league sports, and the ability and historical experience to host international sporting events such as the ], ], or ] ] events.<ref>P. De Groote, , GaWC, ], 21 September 2005</ref> | |||
* Educational institutions; e.g., renowned universities,<ref>{{PDFlink|}} (registration required)</ref> international student attendance,<ref>K. O'Connor, , GaWC, ], 17 February 2005</ref> research facilities | |||
* Sites of ] for ] (for example, ], ] or ]) | |||
* Cities containing ]s of historical and cultural significance<ref>, '']''</ref> | |||
* Tourism throughout{{Citation needed|date=August 2011}} | |||
* City as site or subject in arts and media, television, film, video games, music, literature, magazines, articles, documentary{{Citation needed|date=August 2011}} | |||
* City as an often repeated historic reference, showcase, or symbolic actions{{Citation needed|date=August 2011}} | |||
=== Infrastructural characteristics === | |||
<!---Only one picture per subsection to prevent image crowding---> | |||
], ]]] | |||
* An advanced transportation system that includes several ]s and/or a large ] network offering multiple modes of transportation (], ], ], ], or ]), for example, the ] or the ]. | |||
* ] and popular<ref>{{cite web|url=http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch6en/conc6en/largestpublictransit.html |title=Estimated Ridership of the World’s Largest Public Transit Systems, 1998 |publisher=People.hofstra.edu |accessdate= 9 May 2012}}</ref> ] systems, prominent rail usage,<ref>{{PDFlink||218 KB}}, October 2003</ref> road vehicle usage,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.publicpurpose.com/hwy-intltr.htm |title=Traffic Intensity by International Urban Area: 1990 |publisher=Publicpurpose.com |accessdate= 9 May 2012}}</ref> major seaports<ref>{{dead link|date=May 2012}}</ref> | |||
* A major international ] that serves as an established ] for several international ]s, for example, ], ], ], and ]. ] with ] and ]<ref>, GaWC, ], 8 December 2004</ref> or ]. | |||
* An advanced communications infrastructure on which modern ] rely, such as ], ] networks, ] services, and other high-speed lines of communications. For example, ] and ] are known as the digital and technology capitals of the world. {{Citation needed|date=June 2011}} | |||
* Health facilities; e.g., hospitals, medical laboratories | |||
* Prominent skylines/skyscrapers (for example ], ], ], ] or ])<ref>{{cite web|url=http://homepages.ipact.nl/~egram/skylines.html |title=The World's Best Skylines |publisher=Homepages.ipact.nl |accessdate= 9 May 2012}}</ref> | |||
* Cities' telephone and mail services, airport flights-range, traffic congestion, availability of water, train facilities, nearby parks, hospitals, libraries, police stations, etc. | |||
== Studies == | |||
==== GaWC studies ==== | |||
The first attempt to define, categorize, and rank global cities using 'relational data' was made in 1998 by Jon Beaverstock, ] and ], who all worked at that time at ] in the United Kingdom, and further by academic researchers like ] in Germany (]), who focused on «extra-European cities, predominantly in the Southern hemisphere».<ref> – Article at the ], ] doc.</ref> Together, Beaverstock, Smith and Taylor established the ]. A roster of world cities was outlined in the ''GaWC Research Bulletin'' 5 and ranked cities based on their connectivity through four "advanced producer services": accountancy, advertising, banking/finance, and law.<ref name="GaWC 5"/> The GaWC inventory identifies three levels of global cities and several sub-ranks. | |||
The 2004 rankings acknowledged several new indicators while continuing to rank city economics more heavily than political or cultural factors. The 2008 roster, similar to the 1998 version, is sorted into categories of "Alpha" world cities (with four sub-categories), "Beta" world cities (three sub-categories), "Gamma" world cities (three sub-categories), and additional cities with "High sufficiency" or "Sufficiency" world city presence. | |||
The 2010 roster of leading Alpha, Beta and Gamma world cities is as follows:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/world2010.html|title=The World According to GaWC 2010|work=Globalization and World Cities (GaWC) Study Group and Network|publisher=]|accessdate=2011-09-15}}</ref> | |||
{{wide image|GaWC World Cities.png|450px|A map showing the distribution of GaWC-ranked world cities (2010 data).}} | |||
<div style="float: left; width: 33%; vertical-align: top; margin-right: 1px;"> | |||
{| class="wikitable plainrowheaders" style="width: 100%" | |||
|- | |||
! scope="col" style="width: 5em;" | Category | |||
! scope="col" | Cities | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#FF4500" | Alpha++ | |||
| | |||
* {{flagicon|GBR}} ] | * {{flagicon|GBR}} ] | ||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | * {{flagicon|USA}} ] | ||
|- | |||
====Alpha +==== | |||
| style="background:#FF4500" | Alpha+ | |||
* {{flagicon|CHN}} ] | |||
| | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|UAE}} ] | * {{flagicon|UAE}} ] | ||
* {{flagicon|HKG}} ] | * {{flagicon|HKG}} ] | ||
* {{flagicon|FRA}} ] | * {{flagicon|FRA}} ] | ||
* {{flagicon| |
* {{flagicon|CHN}} ] | ||
* {{flagicon|SGP}} ] | * {{flagicon|SGP}} ] | ||
* {{flagicon|AUS}} ] | * {{flagicon|AUS}} ] | ||
* {{flagicon|JPN}} ] | * {{flagicon|JPN}} ] | ||
|- | |||
| style="background:#FF4500" | Alpha | |||
| | |||
* {{flagicon|NLD}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|PRC}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|BEL}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|ARG}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|DEU}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|MYS}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|ESP}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|MEX}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|ITA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|RUS}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|IND}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|BRA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|KOR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|CAN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#FF4500" | Alpha− | |||
| | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|THA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|ESP}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|IRE}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|TUR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|IDN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|ZAF}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|POR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|AUS}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|DEU}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|IND}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|CHL}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|ROC}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|AUT}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|POL}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|CHE}} ] | |||
|} | |||
</div> | |||
<div style="float: left; width: 33%; vertical-align: top; margin-right: 1px;"> | |||
{| class="wikitable plainrowheaders" style="width: 100%" | |||
|- | |||
! scope="col" style="width: 5em;" | Category | |||
! scope="col" | Cities | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#FF8C00" | Beta+ | |||
| | |||
* {{flagicon|GRC}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|IND}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|DEU}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|COL}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|EGY}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|DEN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|DEU}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|DEU}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|PHI}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|CAN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|CZE}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|ITA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|SWE}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|ISR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|CAN}} ] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#FF8C00" | Beta | |||
| | |||
* {{flagicon|NZL}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|LBN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|ROM}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|HUN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|ZAF}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|VEN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|IND}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|PRC}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|VNM}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|PAK}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|UKR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|PER}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|LUX}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|GBR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|URY}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|NOR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|SAU}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#FF8C00" | Beta− | |||
| | |||
* {{flagicon|UAE}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|GBR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|SVK}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|AUS}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|IND}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|CAN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|MAR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|DEU}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|CHE}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|GUA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|FIN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|NGA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|BHR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|MEX}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|CYP}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|JPN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|PAN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|AUS}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|MUS}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|BRA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|PRI}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|PRC}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|BUL}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|DEU}} ] | |||
|} | |||
</div> | |||
<div style="float: left; width: 33%; vertical-align: top; margin-right: 1px;"> | |||
{| class="wikitable plainrowheaders" style="width: 100%" | |||
|- | |||
! scope="col" style="width: 5em;" | Category | |||
! scope="col" | Cities | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:gold;"| Gamma+ | |||
| | |||
* {{flagicon|AUS}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|JOR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|BEL}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|SRB}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|GBR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|QAT}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|GBR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|GBR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|VNM}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|IND}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|SAU}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|KWT}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|PAK}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|KEN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|LVA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|CRI}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|TUN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|CRO}} ] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:gold;"| Gamma | |||
| | |||
* {{flagicon|KAZ}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|CAN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|MEX}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|GBR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|FRA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|ECU}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|NLD}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|SLV}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|DOM}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|RUS}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|ESP}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|LTU}} ] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:gold;"| Gamma− | |||
| | |||
* {{flagicon|GHA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|GBR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|LKA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|BRA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|ZAF}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|CYM}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|SWE}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|ECU}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|PAK}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|SVN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|FRA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|OMN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|JPN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|CAN}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|PRT}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|BRA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|IND}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|GBR}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|EST}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|HND}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|ITA}} ] | |||
* {{flagicon|NZL}} ] | |||
|} | |||
</div><br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
=== |
===Global Cities Index (Kearney)=== | ||
In 2008, the American journal '']'', working with the consulting firm ] and the ], published a ranking of global cities based on consultation with ], ], and others.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.atkearney.com/documents/10192/dfedfc4c-8a62-4162-90e5-2a3f14f0da3a |title=2012 Global Cities Index and Emerging Cities Outlook |format=PDF |access-date=9 May 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020223227/http://www.atkearney.com/documents/10192/dfedfc4c-8a62-4162-90e5-2a3f14f0da3a |archive-date=20 October 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=The 2008 Global Cities Index |journal=] |issue=November/December 2008 |date=21 October 2008 |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4509 |access-date=31 October 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100107184223/http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4509 |archive-date=7 January 2010 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> The ranking is based on 27 metrics across five dimensions: business activity, ], information exchange, cultural experience, and political engagement.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.atkearney.com/global-cities/2019 |title=Read @ATKearney: Una Cuestión de Talento: Cómo el Capital Humano Determinará los Próximos Líderes Mundiales |website=Atkearney.com |language=en-US |access-date=16 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191220065230/https://www.atkearney.com/global-cities/2019 |archive-date=20 December 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> The top ranked cities in 2024 are:<ref name="kearney2024">{{Cite web|url=https://www.kearney.com/service/global-business-policy-council/gcr/2024-full-report|title=Resurgent in a world at risk: 2024 Global Cities Report|website=Kearney}}</ref> | |||
# {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
In 2008, the ] journal '']'', in conjunction with consulting firm ] and the ], published a ranking of global cities, based on consultation with ], ], and others. ''Foreign Policy'' noted that "the world’s biggest, most interconnected cities help set global agendas, weather transnational dangers, and serve as the hubs of global integration. They are the engines of growth for their countries and the gateways to the resources of their regions."<ref> | |||
# {{flagicon|GBR}} ] | |||
{{cite journal | |||
# {{flagicon|FRA}} ] | |||
| title = The 2008 Global Cities Index | |||
# {{flagicon|JPN}} ] | |||
| journal = ] | |||
# {{flagicon|SGP}} ] | |||
| issue = November/December 2008 | |||
# {{flagicon|CHN}} ] | |||
| date = 21 October 2008 | |||
# {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
| url = http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4509 | |||
# {{flagicon|CHN}} ] | |||
| id = | |||
# {{flagicon|HKG}} ] | |||
| accessdate = 2008-10-31}} | |||
# {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
</ref> | |||
===Global Cities Index (Oxford Economics)=== | |||
In 2012 the index was updated.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.atkearney.com/images/global/pdf/2012_Global_Cities_Index_and_Emerging_Cities_Outlook-FINAL3.pdf |title=2012 Global Cities Index and Emerging Cities Outlook |format=PDF |accessdate= 9 May 2012}}</ref> | |||
Advisory firm ] released its Global Cities Index in 2024, ranking the world's largest 1,000 cities based on 27 indicators across five categories (economics, ], ], environment, and ]) with more weight on economic factors. The top ranked cities in 2024 are:<ref>{{Cite web |title=New York, London Top Oxford Economics Ranking of 1,000 Global Cities |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-05-21/new-york-london-top-oxford-economics-ranking-of-1-000-global-cities |access-date=2024-05-21 |website=Bloomberg |date=21 May 2024 |first1= Alex |last1=Millson }}</ref> | |||
# {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
# {{flagicon|GBR}} ] | |||
# {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
# {{flagicon|JPN}} ] | |||
# {{flagicon|FRA}} ] | |||
# {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
# {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
# {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
# {{flagicon|AUS}} ] | |||
# {{flagicon|CHE}} ] | |||
===Global Power City Index=== | |||
<center> | |||
The Tokyo-based Institute for Urban Strategies at The Mori Memorial Foundation, issued a study of global cities in 2008. They are ranked in six categories: economy, research and development, cultural interaction, ], environment, and accessibility, with 70 individual indicators among them. The top ten world cities are also ranked by subjective categories, including manager, researcher, artist, visitor and resident.<ref name ="gpci2023">{{cite web |title=Global Power City Index 2023 |url=https://www.mori-m-foundation.or.jp/english/ius2/gpci2/ |website=The Mori Memorial Foundation |access-date=9 November 2023|archive-date=9 November 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231109215341/https://www.mori-m-foundation.or.jp/english/ius2/gpci2/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Inoue |first=Yukana |date=2023-11-09 |title=Tokyo remains third in global power index despite downturn |url=https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2023/11/09/japan/society/global-city-ranking-tokyo/ |access-date=2024-07-09 |website=The Japan Times |language=en}}</ref> The top 10 cities in 2023 are:<ref name="gpci2023"/> | |||
{{Location map+|World|width=650|float=none|border=none|caption=Top ten global cities|places= | |||
# {{flagicon|GBR}} ] | |||
{{Location map~|World|lat=40.39|long=-73.56|label=<small>#1 New York</small>|position=right|mark=Green pog.svg|marksize=7}} | |||
# {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
{{Location map~|World|lat=51.3|long=-0.7|label=<small>#2 London</small>|position=left|mark=Green pog.svg|marksize=7}} | |||
# {{flagicon|JPN}} ] | |||
{{Location map~|World|lat=48.51|long=2.21|label=<br /><small>#3 Paris</small>|position=left|mark=Green pog.svg|marksize=7}} | |||
# {{flagicon|FRA}} ] | |||
{{Location map~|World|lat=35.41|long=139.41|label=<small>#4 Tokyo</small>|position=right|mark=Green pog.svg|marksize=7}} | |||
# {{flagicon|SGP}} ] | |||
{{Location map~|World|lat=22.16|long=114.09|label=<small>#5 Hong Kong</small>|position=right|mark=Green pog.svg|marksize=7}} | |||
# {{flagicon|NLD}} ] | |||
{{Location map~|World|lat=34.03|long=-118.15|label=<small>#6 Los Angeles</small>|position=left|mark=Green pog.svg|marksize=7}} | |||
# {{flagicon|KOR}} ] | |||
{{Location map~|World|lat=41.52|long=-87.37|label=<small>#7 Chicago</small>|position=left|mark=Green pog.svg|marksize=7}} | |||
# {{flagicon|UAE}} ] | |||
{{Location map~|World|lat=37.33|long=126.58|label=<small>#8 Seoul</small>|position=left|mark=Green pog.svg|marksize=7}} | |||
# {{flagicon|AUS}} ] | |||
{{Location map~|World|lat=50.51|long=4.21|label=<small>#9 Brussels</small>|position=right|mark=Green pog.svg|marksize=7}} | |||
# {{flagicon|GER}} ] | |||
{{Location map~|World|lat=38.53|long=-77.02|label=<small><br />#10 Washington, D.C.</small>|position=right|mark=Green pog.svg|marksize=7}} | |||
}} | |||
</center> | |||
===World's Best Cities ranking=== | |||
<div style="float: left; width: 33%; vertical-align: top; margin-right: 1px;"> | |||
Consultancy firm Resonance publishes the World’s Best Cities ranking. They are ranked in three categories: livability, lovability and prosperity, each of them using different factors. The top 10 cities in 2024 are:<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.timeout.com/news/its-official-these-are-the-best-cities-in-the-world-according-to-resonance-consultancy-112024|title=It's official: these are the best cities in the world, according to Resonance Consultancy|date=20 November 2024|first=Liv|last=Kelly|work=TimeOut}}</ref> | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
# {{flagicon|GBR}} ] | |||
|- | |||
# {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
||'''Rank''' | |||
# {{flagicon|FRA}} ] | |||
||{{center|'''Change'''}} | |||
# {{flagicon|JPN}} ] | |||
||{{center|'''City'''}} | |||
# {{flagicon|SGP}} ] | |||
||'''Rating''' | |||
# {{flagicon|ITA}} ] | |||
|- | |||
# {{flagicon|SPA}} ] | |||
|1 | |||
# {{flagicon|SPA}} ] | |||
|align=center|{{Steady}} | |||
# {{flagicon|GER}} ] | |||
# {{flagicon|AUS}} ] | |||
|6.35 | |||
|- | |||
|2 | |||
|align=center|{{Steady}} | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|UK}} ] | |||
|5.79 | |||
|- | |||
|3 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|FRA}} ] | |||
|5.48 | |||
|- | |||
|4 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|JPN}} ] | |||
|4.99 | |||
|- | |||
|5 | |||
|align=center|{{Steady}} | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|HKG}} ] | |||
|4.56 | |||
|- | |||
|6 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
|3.94 | |||
|- | |||
|7 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
|3.66 | |||
|- | |||
|8 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 2 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|KOR}} ] | |||
|3.41 | |||
|- | |||
|9 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 2 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|BEL}} ] | |||
|3.33 | |||
|- | |||
|10 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 3 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
|3.22 | |||
|- | |||
|11 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 3 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Singapore}} ] | |||
|3.20 | |||
|- | |||
|12 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 3 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|AUS}} ] | |||
|3.13 | |||
|- | |||
|13 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 5 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Austria}} ] | |||
|3.11 | |||
|- | |||
|14 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|CHN}} ] | |||
|3.05 | |||
|- | |||
|15 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 4 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
|2.94 | |||
|- | |||
|16 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 2 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|CAN}} ] | |||
|2.92 | |||
|- | |||
|17 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 5 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
|2.89 | |||
|- | |||
|18 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|ESP}} ] | |||
|2.80 | |||
|- | |||
|19 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 6 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|RUS}} ] | |||
|2.77 | |||
|- | |||
|20 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 4 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|GER}} ] | |||
|2.76 | |||
|- | |||
|21 | |||
|align=center|{{Steady}} | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|CHN}} ] | |||
|2.73 | |||
|- | |||
|22 | |||
|align=center|{{Steady}} | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Argentina}} ] | |||
|2.71 | |||
|- | |||
|23 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 3 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|GER}} ] | |||
|2.69 | |||
|- | |||
|24 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 2 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|ESP}} ] | |||
|2.59 | |||
|- | |||
|25 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|SUI}} ] | |||
|2.53 | |||
|} | |||
</div> | |||
<div style="float: left; width: 33%; vertical-align: top; margin-right: 1px;"> | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
||'''Rank''' | |||
||{{center|'''Change'''}} | |||
||{{center|'''City'''}} | |||
||'''Rating''' | |||
|- | |||
|26 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 3 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Netherlands}} ] | |||
|2.45 | |||
|- | |||
|27 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 4 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|SWE}} ] | |||
|2.43 | |||
|- | |||
|28 | |||
|align=center|{{Steady}} | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|ITA}} ] | |||
|2.36 | |||
|- | |||
|29 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 2 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|UAE}} ] | |||
|2.32 | |||
|- | |||
|30 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|CAN}} ] | |||
|2.32 | |||
|- | |||
|31 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 2 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|GER}} ] | |||
|2.31 | |||
|- | |||
|32 | |||
|align=center|NA | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|AUS}} ] | |||
|2.25 | |||
|- | |||
|33 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 2 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|BRA}} ] | |||
|2.19 | |||
|- | |||
|34 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 4 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|MEX}} ] | |||
|2.18 | |||
|- | |||
|35 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 3 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|SUI}} ] | |||
|2.13 | |||
|- | |||
|36 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 2 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
|2.13 | |||
|- | |||
|37 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 4 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Turkey}} ] | |||
|2.10 | |||
|- | |||
|38 | |||
|align=center|{{Steady}} | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
|2.08 | |||
|- | |||
|39 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
|2.06 | |||
|- | |||
|40 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Taiwan}} ] | |||
|2.05 | |||
|- | |||
|41 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|ITA}} ] | |||
|2.01 | |||
|- | |||
|42 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 5 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Denmark}} ] | |||
|1.99 | |||
|- | |||
|43 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 7 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Thailand}} ] | |||
|1.93 | |||
|- | |||
|44 | |||
|align=center|{{Steady}} | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Ireland}} ] | |||
|1.82 | |||
|- | |||
|45 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|IND}} ] | |||
|1.79 | |||
|- | |||
|46 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 4 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Israel}} ] | |||
|1.69 | |||
|- | |||
|47 | |||
|align=center|{{Steady}} | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|JPN}} ] | |||
|1.57 | |||
|- | |||
|48 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 3 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|India}} ] | |||
|1.55 | |||
|- | |||
|49 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Malaysia}} ] | |||
|1.49 | |||
|- | |||
|50 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 7 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Egypt}} ] | |||
|1.49 | |||
|} | |||
</div> | |||
<div style="float: left; width: 33%; vertical-align: top; margin-right: 1px;"> | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
||'''Rank''' | |||
||{{center|'''Change'''}} | |||
||{{center|'''City'''}} | |||
||'''Rating''' | |||
|- | |||
|51 | |||
|align=center|{{Steady}} | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Philippines}} ] | |||
|1.49 | |||
|- | |||
|52 | |||
|align=center|{{Steady}} | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|South Africa}} ] | |||
|1.48 | |||
|- | |||
|53 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 4 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|BRA}} ] | |||
|1.31 | |||
|- | |||
|54 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Indonesia}} ] | |||
|1.30 | |||
|- | |||
|55 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|COL}} ] | |||
|1.17 | |||
|- | |||
|56 | |||
|align=center|{{Steady}} | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|KEN}} ] | |||
|0.98 | |||
|- | |||
|57 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 2 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Venezuela}} ] | |||
|0.89 | |||
|- | |||
|58 | |||
|align=center|{{Steady}} | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|IND}} ] | |||
|0.85 | |||
|- | |||
|59 | |||
|align=center|{{Steady}} | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Nigeria}} ] | |||
|0.84 | |||
|- | |||
|60 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 3 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|CHN}} ] | |||
|0.82 | |||
|- | |||
|61 | |||
|align=center|{{Steady}} | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Vietnam}} ] | |||
|0.72 | |||
|- | |||
|62 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 2 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Pakistan}} ] | |||
|0.66 | |||
|- | |||
|63 | |||
|align=center|{{increase}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|Bangladesh}} ] | |||
|0.65 | |||
|- | |||
|64 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|IND}} ] | |||
|0.63 | |||
|- | |||
|65 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 3 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|CHN}} ] | |||
|0.62 | |||
|- | |||
|66 | |||
|align=center|{{decrease}} 1 | |||
|align=left|{{Flagicon|CHN}} ] | |||
|0.25 | |||
|} | |||
</div><br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
==Financial rankings== | |||
==== Global City Competitiveness Index ==== | |||
===Global Financial Centres Index=== | |||
{{Main|Global Financial Centres Index}} | |||
Strength as a ] has become one of the pre-eminent indicators of a global city's ranking. As of 2024,<ref name=":0">{{cite web |title=The Global Financial Centres Index 35 |url=https://www.longfinance.net/programmes/financial-centre-futures/global-financial-centres-index/gfci-35-explore-the-data/gfci-35-rank/ |url-status= |archive-url= |archive-date= |access-date=}}</ref> the cities representing the top ten financial centers according to the ] by the think tank ] and analytics firm ] are:<ref name="GFCI34">{{cite web |title=GFCI 34 Rank |url=https://www.longfinance.net/programmes/financial-centre-futures/global-financial-centres-index/gfci-34-explore-the-data/gfci-34-rank/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230928132949/https://www.longfinance.net/programmes/financial-centre-futures/global-financial-centres-index/gfci-34-explore-the-data/gfci-34-rank/ |archive-date=28 September 2023 |access-date=28 September 2023}}</ref> | |||
# {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
In 2012, ] ranked the competitiveness of global cities according to their demonstrated ability to attract capital, businesses, talent and visitors.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.managementthinking.eiu.com/hot-spots.html?quicktabs_content=research |title=The Global City Competitiveness Index |publisher=Managementthinking.eiu.com |date=12 March 2012 |accessdate= 9 May 2012}}</ref> | |||
# {{flagicon|GBR}} ] | |||
<div style="float: left; width: 30%; vertical-align: top; margin-right: 1px;"> | |||
# {{flagicon|SIN}} ] | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
# {{flagicon|HKG}} ] | |||
|- | |||
# {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
! Rank | |||
# {{flagicon|CHN}} ] | |||
! City | |||
# {{flagicon|SUI}} ] | |||
! Score | |||
# {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
|- | |||
# {{flagicon|USA}} ] | |||
| 1 | |||
# {{flagicon|KOR}} ] | |||
| 71.4 | |||
|- | |||
| 2 | |||
| {{flagicon|United Kingdom}} ] | |||
| 70.4 | |||
|- | |||
| 3 | |||
| {{flagicon|Singapore}} ] | |||
| 70.0 | |||
|- | |||
| 4 | |||
| {{flagicon|Hong Kong}} ] | |||
| 69.3 | |||
|- | |||
| 4 | |||
| {{flagicon|France}} ] | |||
| 69.3 | |||
|- | |||
| 6 | |||
| {{flagicon|Japan}} ] | |||
| 68.0 | |||
|- | |||
| 7 | |||
| {{flagicon|Switzerland}} ] | |||
| 66.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 8 | |||
| {{flagicon|United States}} ] | |||
| 66.1 | |||
|- | |||
| 9 | |||
| {{flagicon|United States}} ] | |||
| 65.9 | |||
|- | |||
| 10 | |||
| {{flagicon|United States}} ] | |||
| 64.5 | |||
|- | |||
| 11 | |||
| {{flagicon|Germany}} ] | |||
| 64.1 | |||
|- | |||
| 12 | |||
| {{flagicon|Canada}} ] | |||
| 63.9 | |||
|- | |||
| 13 | |||
| {{flagicon|Switzerland}} ] | |||
| 63.3 | |||
|- | |||
| 13 | |||
| {{flagicon|United States}} ] | |||
| 63.3 | |||
|- | |||
| 15 | |||
| {{flagicon|Australia}} ] | |||
| 63.1 | |||
|- | |||
| 16 | |||
| {{flagicon|Australia}} ] | |||
| 62.7 | |||
|- | |||
| 17 | |||
| {{flagicon|Netherlands}} ] | |||
| 62.4 | |||
|- | |||
| 18 | |||
| {{flagicon|Canada}} ] | |||
| 61.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 19 | |||
| {{flagicon|United States}} ] | |||
| 61.5 | |||
|- | |||
| 20 | |||
| {{flagicon|South Korea}} ] | |||
| 60.5 | |||
|- | |||
| 20 | |||
| {{flagicon|Sweden}} ] | |||
| 60.5 | |||
|- | |||
| 22 | |||
| {{flagicon|Canada}} ] | |||
| 60.3 | |||
|- | |||
| 23 | |||
| {{flagicon|Denmark}} ] | |||
| 59.9 | |||
|- | |||
| 23 | |||
| {{flagicon|United States}} ] | |||
| 59.9 | |||
|- | |||
| 25 | |||
| {{flagicon|United States}} ] | |||
| 59.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 25 | |||
| {{flagicon|Austria}} ] | |||
| 59.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 27 | |||
| {{flagicon|Ireland}} ] | |||
| 59.5 | |||
|- | |||
| 28 | |||
| {{flagicon|Spain}} ] | |||
| 59.4 | |||
|- | |||
| 29 | |||
| {{flagicon|United States}} ] | |||
| 59.3 | |||
|- | |||
| 30 | |||
| {{flagicon|United States}} ] | |||
| 58.5 | |||
|- | |||
| 31 | |||
| {{flagicon|United States}} ] | |||
| 58.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 31 | |||
| {{flagicon|Germany}} ] | |||
| 58.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 33 | |||
| {{flagicon|Norway}} ] | |||
| 57.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 34 | |||
| {{flagicon|Belgium}} ] | |||
| 57.1 | |||
|- | |||
| 35 | |||
| {{flagicon|Germany}} ] | |||
| 56.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 36 | |||
| {{flagicon|New Zealand}} ] | |||
| 56.7 | |||
|- | |||
| 37 | |||
| {{flagicon|United Kingdom}} ] | |||
| 56.6 | |||
|- | |||
| 37 | |||
| {{flagicon|Taiwan}} ] | |||
| 56.6 | |||
|- | |||
| 39 | |||
| {{flagicon|China}} ] | |||
| 56.0 | |||
|- | |||
| 40 | |||
| {{flagicon|UAE}} ] | |||
| 55.9 | |||
|} | |||
</div> | |||
<div style="float: left; width: 30%; vertical-align: top; margin-right: 1px;"> | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
! Rank | |||
! City | |||
! Score | |||
|- | |||
| 41 | |||
| {{flagicon|UAE}} ] | |||
| 55.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 41 | |||
| {{flagicon|Spain}} ] | |||
| 55.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 43 | |||
| {{flagicon|United States}} ] | |||
| 55.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 43 | |||
| {{flagicon|China}} ] | |||
| 55.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 45 | |||
| {{flagicon|Malaysia}} ] | |||
| 55.0 | |||
|- | |||
| 46 | |||
| {{flagicon|CZE}} ] | |||
| 53.7 | |||
|- | |||
| 47 | |||
| {{flagicon|Qatar}} ] | |||
| 52.9 | |||
|- | |||
| 47 | |||
| {{flagicon|Italy}} ] | |||
| 52.9 | |||
|- | |||
| 47 | |||
| {{flagicon|Japan}} ] | |||
| 52.9 | |||
|- | |||
| 50 | |||
| {{flagicon|Japan}} ] | |||
| 52.3 | |||
|- | |||
| 50 | |||
| {{flagicon|Italy}} ] | |||
| 52.3 | |||
|- | |||
| 52 | |||
| {{flagicon|China}} ] | |||
| 51.7 | |||
|- | |||
| 53 | |||
| {{flagicon|Poland}} ] | |||
| 51.3 | |||
|- | |||
| 54 | |||
| {{flagicon|Monaco}} ] | |||
| 51.0 | |||
|- | |||
| 55 | |||
| {{flagicon|Hungary}} ] | |||
| 50.4 | |||
|- | |||
| 56 | |||
| {{flagicon|South Korea}} ] | |||
| 50.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 57 | |||
| {{flagicon|Portugal}} ] | |||
| 49.5 | |||
|- | |||
| 58 | |||
| {{flagicon|Russia}} ] | |||
| 49.4 | |||
|- | |||
| 59 | |||
| {{flagicon|Israel}} ] | |||
| 49.3 | |||
|- | |||
| 60 | |||
| {{flagicon|Argentina}} ] | |||
| 49.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 61 | |||
| {{flagicon|Thailand}} ] | |||
| 49.0 | |||
|- | |||
| 62 | |||
| {{flagicon|Brazil}} ] | |||
| 48.3 | |||
|- | |||
| 63 | |||
| {{flagicon|Japan}} ] | |||
| 47.7 | |||
|- | |||
| 64 | |||
| {{flagicon|South Korea}} ] | |||
| 47.4 | |||
|- | |||
| 64 | |||
| {{flagicon|China}} ] | |||
| 47.4 | |||
|- | |||
| 66 | |||
| {{flagicon|Poland}} ] | |||
| 47.3 | |||
|- | |||
| 67 | |||
| {{flagicon|South Africa}} ] | |||
| 47.1 | |||
|- | |||
| 68 | |||
| {{flagicon|India}} ] | |||
| 46.7 | |||
|- | |||
| 68 | |||
| {{flagicon|Chile}} ] | |||
| 46.7 | |||
|- | |||
| 70 | |||
| {{flagicon|India}} ] | |||
| 46.6 | |||
|- | |||
| 71 | |||
| {{flagicon|Mexico}} ] | |||
| 46.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 72 | |||
| {{flagicon|Greece}} ] | |||
| 46.1 | |||
|- | |||
| 73 | |||
| {{flagicon|South Africa}} ] | |||
| 45.9 | |||
|- | |||
| 74 | |||
| {{flagicon|Turkey}} ] | |||
| 45.5 | |||
|- | |||
| 75 | |||
| {{flagicon|China}} ] | |||
| 45.4 | |||
|- | |||
| 76 | |||
| {{flagicon|Romania}} ] | |||
| 44.9 | |||
|- | |||
| 76 | |||
| {{flagicon|Brazil}} ] | |||
| 44.9 | |||
|- | |||
| 78 | |||
| {{flagicon|Panama}} ] | |||
| 44.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 79 | |||
| {{flagicon|India}} ] | |||
| 44.6 | |||
|- | |||
| 80 | |||
| {{flagicon|Kuwait}} ] | |||
| 44.2 | |||
|} | |||
</div> | |||
<div style="float: left; width: 30%; vertical-align: top; margin-right: 1px;"> | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
! Rank | |||
! City | |||
! Score | |||
|- | |||
| 81 | |||
| {{flagicon|Indonesia}} ] | |||
| 44.1 | |||
|- | |||
| 82 | |||
| {{flagicon|China}} ] | |||
| 44.0 | |||
|- | |||
| 83 | |||
| {{flagicon|China}} ] | |||
| 43.5 | |||
|- | |||
| 84 | |||
| {{flagicon|China}} ] | |||
| 43.4 | |||
|- | |||
| 85 | |||
| {{flagicon|Philippines}} ] | |||
| 43.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 86 | |||
| {{flagicon|Oman}} ] | |||
| 43.0 | |||
|- | |||
| 87 | |||
| {{flagicon|China}} ] | |||
| 42.9 | |||
|- | |||
| 88 | |||
| {{flagicon|Peru}} ] | |||
| 42.5 | |||
|- | |||
| 89 | |||
| {{flagicon|Colombia}} ] | |||
| 42.3 | |||
|- | |||
| 90 | |||
| {{flagicon|Mexico}} ] | |||
| 42.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 91 | |||
| {{flagicon|China}} ] | |||
| 42.1 | |||
|- | |||
| 92 | |||
| {{flagicon|India}} ] | |||
| 41.9 | |||
|- | |||
| 93 | |||
| {{flagicon|China}} ] | |||
| 41.6 | |||
|- | |||
| 94 | |||
| {{flagicon|South Africa}} ] | |||
| 41.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 95 | |||
| {{flagicon|Turkey}} ] | |||
| 40.9 | |||
|- | |||
| 96 | |||
| {{flagicon|Colombia}} ] | |||
| 40.0 | |||
|- | |||
| 97 | |||
| {{flagicon|India}} ] | |||
| 39.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 98 | |||
| {{flagicon|Brazil}} ] | |||
| 39.4 | |||
|- | |||
| 98 | |||
| {{flagicon|India}} ] | |||
| 39.4 | |||
|- | |||
| 100 | |||
| {{flagicon|Kazakhstan}} ] | |||
| 39.3 | |||
|- | |||
| 100 | |||
| {{flagicon|Russia}} ] | |||
| 39.3 | |||
|- | |||
| 102 | |||
| {{flagicon|Mexico}} ] | |||
| 39.0 | |||
|- | |||
| 102 | |||
| {{flagicon|Brazil}} ] | |||
| 39.0 | |||
|- | |||
| 104 | |||
| {{flagicon|Vietnam}} ] | |||
| 38.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 105 | |||
| {{flagicon|India}} ] | |||
| 38.1 | |||
|- | |||
| 106 | |||
| {{flagicon|India}} ] | |||
| 37.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 106 | |||
| {{flagicon|Saudi Arabia}} ] | |||
| 37.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 108 | |||
| {{flagicon|Ukraine}} ] | |||
| 36.9 | |||
|- | |||
| 109 | |||
| {{flagicon|Vietnam}} ] | |||
| 36.5 | |||
|- | |||
| 110 | |||
| {{flagicon|Indonesia}} ] | |||
| 35.9 | |||
|- | |||
| 111 | |||
| {{flagicon|Sri Lanka}} ] | |||
| 35.6 | |||
|- | |||
| 112 | |||
| {{flagicon|Pakistan}} ] | |||
| 35.5 | |||
|- | |||
| 113 | |||
| {{flagicon|Egypt}} ] | |||
| 35.0 | |||
|- | |||
| 114 | |||
| {{flagicon|Indonesia}} ] | |||
| 34.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 115 | |||
| {{flagicon|Kenya}} ] | |||
| 34.6 | |||
|- | |||
| 116 | |||
| {{flagicon|Egypt}} ] | |||
| 31.8 | |||
|- | |||
| 117 | |||
| {{flagicon|Lebanon}} ] | |||
| 30.6 | |||
|- | |||
| 118 | |||
| {{flagicon|Bangladesh}} ] | |||
| 27.7 | |||
|- | |||
| 119 | |||
| {{flagicon|Nigeria}} ] | |||
| 27.6 | |||
|- | |||
| 120 | |||
| {{flagicon|Iran}} ] | |||
| 27.2 | |||
|} | |||
</div><br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
=== |
===''The Wealth Report''=== | ||
] ] and the ] publish ''The Wealth Report'', which includes a "Global Cities Survey", evaluating the most important cities to ]s (HNWIs, having over $25 million of investable assets each). Criteria are economic activity, ], knowledge and influence, and quality of life.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.knightfrank.com/wealthreport/2015/global-cities|title=The Wealth Report 2015|publisher=]|access-date=18 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150618062302/http://www.knightfrank.com/wealthreport/2015/global-cities|archive-date=18 June 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.knightfrank.com/resources/wealthreport2015/wealthpdf/04-wealth-report-global-cities-chapter.pdf|title=Global Cities Survey|access-date=18 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150323081951/http://www.knightfrank.com/resources/wealthreport2015/wealthpdf/04-wealth-report-global-cities-chapter.pdf|archive-date=23 March 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> The most important cities to UHNWIs in 2022 are:<ref name="knightfrank2022">{{Cite web|url=https://en.ac-mos.ru/ratings/knight-frank-city-wealth-index/|title=Knight Frank: City Wealth Index|access-date=20 June 2023|archive-date=20 June 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230620074853/https://en.ac-mos.ru/ratings/knight-frank-city-wealth-index/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
<ol start=1><li>{{flagicon|GBR}} ]</li></ol> | |||
The Institute for Urban Strategies at The Mori Memorial Foundation in ], ] issued a comprehensive study of global cities in 2011. The ranking is based on six overall categories, "Economy", "Research & Development", "Cultural Interaction", "Livability", "Environment", and "Accessibility", with 69 individual indicators among them.<ref> | |||
<ol start=2><li>{{flagicon|FRA}} ] & {{flagicon|USA}} ]</li></ol> | |||
{{cite journal|title=Global Power City Index 2010|publisher=Institute for Urban Strategies at The Mori Memorial Foundation|location = Tokyo, Japan|date = October, 2010|url = http://www.mori-m-foundation.or.jp/english/research/project/6/pdf/GPCI2011_English.pdf|accessdate = 2012-02-26}}</ref> This Japanese ranking also breaks down top ten world cities ranked in subjective categories such as "manager, researcher, artist, visitor and resident." | |||
<ol start=4><li>{{flagicon|USA}} ]</li></ol> | |||
] | |||
<ol start=5><li>{{flagicon|JPN}} ]</li></ol> | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
<ol start=6><li>{{flagicon|USA}} ]</li></ol> | |||
|- | |||
<ol start=7><li>{{flagicon|SGP}} ]</li></ol> | |||
!Rank!!City!!Score!!Best category (position) | |||
<ol start=8><li>{{flagicon|HKG}} ]</li></ol> | |||
|- | |||
<ol start=9><li>{{flagicon|CAN}} ]</li></ol> | |||
|1|| {{flagicon|United States}} ]||320.9||Research & Development (1.) | |||
<ol start=10><li>{{flagicon|CHN}} ]</li></ol> | |||
|- | |||
|2|| {{flagicon|United Kingdom}} ]||320.6||Cultural Interaction (1.) | |||
|- | |||
|3|| {{flagicon|France}} ]||308.7||Accessibility (1.) Livability (1.) | |||
|- | |||
|4|| {{flagicon|Japan}} ]||304.3||Economy (1.) | |||
|- | |||
|5|| {{flagicon|Singapore}} ]||255.3||Cultural Interaction (4.) | |||
|- | |||
|6|| {{flagicon|Germany}} ]||234.8||Environment (4.) | |||
|- | |||
|7|| {{flagicon|South Korea}} ]||233.4||Research & Development (5.) | |||
|- | |||
|8|| {{flagicon|Hong Kong}} ]||231.1||Economy (6.) Cultural Interaction (6.) | |||
|- | |||
|9|| {{flagicon|The Netherlands}} ]||226.6||Accessibility (5.) | |||
|- | |||
|10|| {{flagicon|Germany}} ]||225.1||Environment (3.) | |||
|- | |||
|11|| {{flagicon|Australia}} ]||215.8||Cultural Interaction (11.) | |||
|- | |||
|12|| {{flagicon|Austria}} ]||215.3||Environment (5.) | |||
|- | |||
|13|| {{flagicon|United States}} ]||212.2||Research & Development (6.) | |||
|- | |||
|14|| {{flagicon|Switzerland}} ]||211.4||Environment (2.) | |||
|- | |||
|15|| {{flagicon|Japan}} ]||205.8||Livability (3.) | |||
|- | |||
|16|| {{flagicon|United States}} ]||205.7||Research & Development (3.) | |||
|- | |||
|17|| {{flagicon|Switzerland}} ]||205.2||Environment (1.) | |||
|- | |||
|18|| {{flagicon|China}} ]||204.2||Economy (3.) | |||
|- | |||
|19|| {{flagicon|Denmark}} ]||203.2||Environment (10.) | |||
|- | |||
|20|| {{flagicon|Spain}} ]||202.8||Livability (8.) | |||
|- | |||
|21|| {{flagicon|United States}} ]||201.5||Research & Development (10.) | |||
|- | |||
|22|| {{flagicon|Canada}} ]||201.3||Livability (2.) | |||
|- | |||
|23|| {{flagicon|China}} ]||199.3||Economy (8.) | |||
|- | |||
|24|| {{flagicon|Belgium}} ]||199.2||Accessibility (13.) | |||
|- | |||
|25|| {{flagicon|Canada}} ]||194.6||Research & Development (15.) | |||
|} | |||
==See also== | |||
==== World City Survey ==== | |||
{{portal|Cities|World}} | |||
* ] | |||
In 2010 the London based estate agent ] together with the ] published a survey of world cities.<ref>, Knightfrank.com, 25. March 2010</ref> The Wealth Report 2010, which includes the World City Survey, assesses four parameters — economic activity, political power, knowledge and influence, and quality of life. The list aimed to rank the world's 40 most influential cities. New York tops the list in Economic activity, political power and knowledge and Paris tops it in quality of life. London and Paris get the same aggregate ranking of 149, making them ''de facto'' world's 2nd and 3rd most prominent cities.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2010/BUSINESS/04/10/cities.dominate.world/index.html|title=Revealed: Cities that rule the world|publisher=CNN|date=10 April 2010}}</ref> In 2011, the list was updated, and the top 20 cities ranked are:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.knightfrank.com/documents/wealthreport/TheWealthReport2011.pdf|title=The Wealth Report 2011|publisher=]}}</ref> | |||
* ] | |||
] | |||
* ] | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
* ] | |||
|- | |||
* ] | |||
!Rank !! City !! Best category | |||
* ] | |||
|- | |||
* ] | |||
|1 || {{flagicon|United States}} ] || Economic activity | |||
* ] | |||
|- | |||
|2 || {{flagicon|United Kingdom}} ] || Economic activity | |||
|- | |||
|2 || {{flagicon|France}} ] || Quality of life | |||
|- | |||
|4 || {{flagicon|Japan}} ] || Economic activity | |||
|- | |||
|5 || {{flagicon|Belgium}} ] || Political power | |||
|- | |||
|6 || {{flagicon|United States}} ] || Knowledge and influence | |||
|- | |||
|7 || {{flagicon|Singapore}} ] || Economic activity | |||
|- | |||
|8 || {{flagicon|China}} ] || Political power | |||
|- | |||
|9 || {{flagicon|Canada}} ] || Quality of life | |||
|- | |||
|10 || {{flagicon|Germany}} ] || Quality of life | |||
|- | |||
|11 || {{flagicon|United States}} ] || Knowledge and influence | |||
|- | |||
|12 || {{flagicon|United States}} ] || Political power | |||
|- | |||
|13 || {{flagicon|South Korea}} ] || Economic activity | |||
|- | |||
|14 || {{flagicon|Germany}} ] || Quality of life | |||
|- | |||
|15 || {{flagicon|Australia}} ] || Knowledge and influence | |||
|- | |||
|16 || {{flagicon|United States}} ] || Knowledge and influence | |||
|- | |||
|17 || {{flagicon|Hong Kong}} ] || Economic activity | |||
|- | |||
|18 || {{flagicon|China}} ] || Economic activity | |||
|- | |||
|19 || {{flagicon|Mexico}} ] || Political power | |||
|- | |||
|20 || {{flagicon|Thailand}} ] || Political power | |||
|} | |||
=== Company location survey === | |||
== Cities ranked by category == | |||
{| class="sortable wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
! ''Rank'' | |||
! ]<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.geohive.com/earth/cy_notagg.aspx | title=Cities: largest (without surrounding suburban areas) | publisher=Geohive | accessdate=2011-08-03}}</ref> | |||
! ]<ref>R.L. Forstall, R.P. Greene, and J.B. Pick, , City Futures Conference, (University of Illinois at Chicago, July 2004) – Table 5 (p.34)</ref> | |||
! ]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.migrationinformation.org/datahub/gcmm.cfm |title=Global City Migration Map |publisher=Migrationinformation.org |accessdate= 9 May 2012}}</ref> | |||
! ] (most expensive first)<ref name="living"/> | |||
! ] | |||
! ] | |||
! ] <!--NOTE: the focus of this article is cities, not airports, so please do not keep restoring the list of the largest airports when this is less relevant than a list of cities by airport traffic--> | |||
! ]<ref name="billionaires">, '']'', 17 May 2011</ref> | |||
! ] at total PPPs<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.ukmediacentre.pwc.com/imagelibrary/downloadMedia.asp?MediaDetailsID=863| title=Table 1.2 – Top 30 urban agglomeration GDP rankings in 2005 and illustrative projections to 2020 (using UN definitions and population estimates)|first="UK Economic Outlook, March 2007", page 5|last=]|format=PDF|accessdate=2007-03-09 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20070610175146/http://www.ukmediacentre.pwc.com/imagelibrary/downloadMedia.asp?MediaDetailsID=863 <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = 10 June 2007}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
| 1 || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] | |||
|- | |||
| 2 || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] | |||
|- | |||
| 3 || ] || ] || ]|| ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] | |||
|- | |||
| 4 || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] | |||
|- | |||
| 5 || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] | |||
|- | |||
| 6 || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || (tie)<br>],<br>] || ] | |||
|- | |||
| 7 || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] ||]|| - || ] | |||
|- | |||
| 8 || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] | |||
|- | |||
| 9 || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || (tie)<br>],<br>],<br>] || ] | |||
|- | |||
| 10 || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || ] || - || ] | |||
|} | |||
== See also == | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
== |
==Notes== | ||
{{ |
{{Notelist}} | ||
==References== | |||
== External links == | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
{{commons|Global City}} | |||
* | |||
==External links== | |||
* | |||
{{Commons|Global City}} | |||
* by Jeffrey Kentor and Michael Timberlake of the ] and David Smith of University of California, Irvine | |||
* | |||
* , UN Human Settlements Programme | |||
* ({{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060527205738/http://www.irows.ucr.edu/conferences/globgis/papers/Smith.htm |date=27 May 2006 }}) by Jeffrey Kentor and Michael Timberlake of the ] and David Smith of University of California, Irvine | |||
* , by Peter J. Taylor and Robert E. Lang, February 2005 () | |||
* | |||
{{Cities}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Global City}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Global City}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 06:27, 12 January 2025
City important to the world economy "World city" redirects here. For hypothetical planetwide cities, see Ecumenopolis. For other uses, see World city (disambiguation).
New York City (top) and London (bottom) are the only two cities ranked in the Alpha ++ category by the Globalization and World Cities Research Network. Both cities are considered leading financial, commercial and cultural centers.
A global city is a city that serves as a primary node in the global economic network. The concept originates from geography and urban studies, based on the thesis that globalization has created a hierarchy of strategic geographic locations with varying degrees of influence over finance, trade, and culture worldwide. The global city represents the most complex and significant hub within the international system, characterized by links binding it to other cities that have direct, tangible effects on global socioeconomic affairs.
The criteria of a global city vary depending on the source. Common features include a high degree of urban development, a large population, the presence of major multinational companies, a significant and globalized financial sector, a well-developed and internationally linked transportation infrastructure, local or national economic dominance, high quality educational and research institutions, and a globally influential output of ideas, innovations, or cultural products. Quintessential examples, based on most indices and research, include New York City, London, Paris, and Tokyo.
Origin and terminology
The term 'global city' was popularized by sociologist Saskia Sassen in her 1991 book, The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Before then, other terms were used for urban centers with roughly the same features. The term 'world city', meaning a city heavily involved in global trade, appeared in a May 1886 description of Liverpool, by The Illustrated London News; British sociologist and geographer Patrick Geddes used the term in 1915. The term 'megacity' entered common use in the late 19th or early 20th century, the earliest known example being a publication by the University of Texas in 1904. In the 21st century, the terms are usually focused on a city's financial power and high technology infrastructure.
Criteria
Competing groups have devised competing means to classify and rank world cities and to distinguish them from other cities. Although there is a consensus on the leading world cities, the chosen criteria affect which other cities are included. Selection criteria may be based on a yardstick value (e.g., if the producer-service sector is the largest sector then city X is a world city) or on an imminent determination (if the producer-service sector of city X is greater than the combined producer-service sectors of N other cities then city X is a world city.) Although criteria are variable and fluid, typical characteristics of world cities include:
- The most prominent criterion has been providing a variety of international financial services, notably in finance, insurance, real estate, banking, accountancy, and marketing; and their amalgamation of financial headquarters, a stock exchange, and other major financial institutions,
- Headquarters of numerous multinational corporations,
- Domination of the trade and economy of a large surrounding area,
- Major manufacturing centers with port and container facilities,
- Considerable decision-making power daily and at a global level,
- Centers of new ideas and innovation in business, economics, and culture,
- Centers of digital and other media and communications for global networks,
- The dominance of the national region with great international significance,
- The high percentage of residents employed in the services sector and information sector,
- High-quality educational institutions, including renowned universities and research facilities; and attracting international student attendance,
- Multi-functional infrastructure offering some of the best legal, medical, and entertainment facilities in the country,
- High diversity in language, culture, religion, and ideologies.
General rankings
Global city rankings are numerous. New York City, London, Tokyo, and Paris are the most commonly mentioned.
GaWC World Cities
Main article: Globalization and World Cities Research NetworkThe Globalization and World Cities Research Network (GaWC) is a British think tank that studies the relationships between world cities in the context of globalization. It is based in the geography department of Loughborough University in Leicestershire, United Kingdom. GaWC was founded by Peter J. Taylor in 1998. Together with Jon Beaverstock and Richard G. Smith, they create the GaWC's biennial categorization of world cities into "Alpha", "Beta" and "Gamma" tiers, based upon their international connectedness. The cities in the top two classifications in the 2024 edition are:
Alpha ++
Alpha +
Global Cities Index (Kearney)
In 2008, the American journal Foreign Policy, working with the consulting firm A.T. Kearney and the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, published a ranking of global cities based on consultation with Saskia Sassen, Witold Rybczynski, and others. The ranking is based on 27 metrics across five dimensions: business activity, human capital, information exchange, cultural experience, and political engagement. The top ranked cities in 2024 are:
Global Cities Index (Oxford Economics)
Advisory firm Oxford Economics released its Global Cities Index in 2024, ranking the world's largest 1,000 cities based on 27 indicators across five categories (economics, human capital, quality of life, environment, and governance) with more weight on economic factors. The top ranked cities in 2024 are:
Global Power City Index
The Tokyo-based Institute for Urban Strategies at The Mori Memorial Foundation, issued a study of global cities in 2008. They are ranked in six categories: economy, research and development, cultural interaction, livability, environment, and accessibility, with 70 individual indicators among them. The top ten world cities are also ranked by subjective categories, including manager, researcher, artist, visitor and resident. The top 10 cities in 2023 are:
World's Best Cities ranking
Consultancy firm Resonance publishes the World’s Best Cities ranking. They are ranked in three categories: livability, lovability and prosperity, each of them using different factors. The top 10 cities in 2024 are:
Financial rankings
Global Financial Centres Index
Main article: Global Financial Centres IndexStrength as a financial center has become one of the pre-eminent indicators of a global city's ranking. As of 2024, the cities representing the top ten financial centers according to the Global Financial Centres Index by the think tank China Development Institute and analytics firm Z/Yen are:
The Wealth Report
Estate agent Knight Frank LLP and the Citi Private Bank publish The Wealth Report, which includes a "Global Cities Survey", evaluating the most important cities to high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs, having over $25 million of investable assets each). Criteria are economic activity, political power, knowledge and influence, and quality of life. The most important cities to UHNWIs in 2022 are:
See also
- Caput Mundi
- City quality of life indices
- Ecumenopolis
- Financial centre
- Metropolitan and urban regions with the largest foreign-born populations
- Globalization
- List of cities by GDP
- Megalopolis
- Metropolis
- Primate city
- Ranally city rating system
Notes
- Also known as a power city, world city, alpha city, or world center
References
- Lenormand, Maxime; Gonçalves, Bruno; Tugores, Antònia; Ramasco, José J. (2015). "Human diffusion and city influence". Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 12 (109): 20150473. doi:10.1098/rsif.2015.0473. PMC 4535413. PMID 26179991.
- Lin, Jan (2012). "World Cities". The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization. doi:10.1002/9780470670590.wbeog820. ISBN 9780470670590.
- Pain, Kathy (2017). "World Cities". International Encyclopedia of Geography: 1–9. doi:10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0525. ISBN 9781118786352.
- Sassen, Saskia (July 2001). "The global city: strategic site/new frontier". Seminar Magazine. No. 503. Archived from the original on 18 October 2006.
- "global city". Britannica. Archived from the original on 20 October 2022. Retrieved 20 October 2022.
- Sassen, Saskia. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. 1991. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-07063-6. Archived 16 March 2015 at the Wayback Machine.
- Belchem, John (18 December 2009). "The Empire in One City? Liverpool's Inconvenient Imperial Past". Reviews in History. Archived from the original on 23 June 2012. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
- ^ Doel, M., & Hubbard, P., (2002), "Taking World Cities Literally: Marketing the City in a Global Space of flows", City, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 351–368. Subscription required.
- Hemisfile: Perspectives on Political and Economic Trends in the Americas. Institute of the Americas. 1994.
- "Asian Cities Pay Hidden Price for Global Status". The Diplomat. 15 February 2015. Archived from the original on 1 February 2016. Retrieved 25 January 2016.
- "The World's Most Influential Cities". Forbes. 14 August 2014. Archived from the original on 5 September 2017. Retrieved 29 August 2017.
- "What are the characteristics of world cities and megacities, and how has their distribution changed since 1950? – HBK Portal". Archived from the original on 17 November 2022. Retrieved 17 November 2022.
- GaWC Research Bulletin 5 Archived 8 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine, GaWC, Loughborough University, 28 July 1999
- Pashley, Rosemary. "HSC Geography". Pascal Press, 2000, p.164
- J.V. Beaverstock, World City Networks 'From Below' Archived 8 March 2006 at the Wayback Machine, GaWC, Loughborough University, 29 September 2010
- K. O'Connor, International Students and Global Cities Archived 5 February 2006 at the Wayback Machine, GaWC, Loughborough University, 17 February 2005
- "Decoding City Performance". Jll.co.uk. 2 April 2019. Archived from the original on 16 October 2019. Retrieved 16 October 2019.
- "Struggling Giants". University of Minnesota Press. Archived from the original on 17 January 2021. Retrieved 31 December 2020.
- Abrahamson, Mark (2004). Global cities (PDF) (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 4. ISBN 978-0195142044. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 January 2021. Retrieved 9 January 2021.
- Taylor, Peter J. (2004). World city network: a global urban analysis. Routledge. p. ix. ISBN 0-415-30249-8. Retrieved 10 October 2010.
- Donald, Stephanie; Gammack, John G. (2007). Tourism and the branded city. London: Ashgate Publishing. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-7546-4829-1. Archived from the original on 30 June 2023. Retrieved 10 October 2010.
- "World Cities 2024". GaWC. Retrieved 1 November 2024.
- "2012 Global Cities Index and Emerging Cities Outlook". Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
- "The 2008 Global Cities Index". Foreign Policy (November/December 2008). 21 October 2008. Archived from the original on 7 January 2010. Retrieved 31 October 2008.
- "Read @ATKearney: Una Cuestión de Talento: Cómo el Capital Humano Determinará los Próximos Líderes Mundiales". Atkearney.com. Archived from the original on 20 December 2019. Retrieved 16 October 2019.
- "Resurgent in a world at risk: 2024 Global Cities Report". Kearney.
- Millson, Alex (21 May 2024). "New York, London Top Oxford Economics Ranking of 1,000 Global Cities". Bloomberg. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
- ^ "Global Power City Index 2023". The Mori Memorial Foundation. Archived from the original on 9 November 2023. Retrieved 9 November 2023.
- Inoue, Yukana (9 November 2023). "Tokyo remains third in global power index despite downturn". The Japan Times. Retrieved 9 July 2024.
- Kelly, Liv (20 November 2024). "It's official: these are the best cities in the world, according to Resonance Consultancy". TimeOut.
- "The Global Financial Centres Index 35".
- "GFCI 34 Rank". Archived from the original on 28 September 2023. Retrieved 28 September 2023.
- "The Wealth Report 2015". Knight Frank LLP. Archived from the original on 18 June 2015. Retrieved 18 June 2015.
- "Global Cities Survey" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 March 2015. Retrieved 18 June 2015.
- "Knight Frank: City Wealth Index". Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
External links
- Repository of Links Relating to Urban Places
- The World-System's City System: A Research Agenda (Archived 27 May 2006 at the Wayback Machine) by Jeffrey Kentor and Michael Timberlake of the University of Utah and David Smith of University of California, Irvine
- UN-HABITAT: The State of the World's Cities