Misplaced Pages

Binary option: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:42, 9 July 2012 editJamesmadison2012 (talk | contribs)17 edits Non exchange-traded binary options← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:29, 24 October 2024 edit undoLimit-theorem (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers2,769 edits removing Spam Undid revision 1253115143 by Spqrv (talk)Tag: Undo 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Financial exotic option with an all-or-nothing payoff}}
In ], a '''binary option''' is a type of ] where the payoff is either some fixed amount of some ] or nothing at all. The two main types of binary options are the cash-or-nothing binary option and the asset-or-nothing binary option. The cash-or-nothing binary option pays some fixed amount of cash if the option expires in-the-money while the asset-or-nothing pays the value of the underlying security. Thus, the options are binary in nature because there are only two possible outcomes. They are also called '''all-or-nothing options''', '''digital options''' (more common in forex/interest rate markets), and '''Fixed Return Options''' ('''FROs''') (on the ]). Binary options are usually ] options.
{{Prone to spam|date=January 2014}}
A '''binary option''' is a ] ] in which the payoff is either some fixed monetary amount or nothing at all.<ref name="Breeden, D. T. 1978">Breeden, D. T., & Litzenberger, R. H. (1978). "Prices of state-contingent claims implicit in option prices". ''Journal of Business'', 621–651.</ref><ref name="Gatheral, J. 2006">Gatheral, J. (2006). ''The volatility surface: a practitioner's guide'' (Vol. 357). John Wiley & Sons.</ref> The two main types of binary options are the cash-or-nothing binary option and the asset-or-nothing binary option. The former pays some fixed amount of cash if the option expires ] while the latter pays the value of the underlying security. They are also called '''all-or-nothing options''', '''digital options''' (more common in forex/interest rate markets), and '''fixed return options''' ('''FROs''') (on the ]).<ref name="Ipedia"> Investopedia. Retrieved 2013-06-30.</ref>


While binary options may be used in theoretical asset pricing, they are prone to ] in their applications and hence banned by regulators in many jurisdictions as a form of ].<ref name="Globes 12-15-16" /> Many binary option outlets have been exposed as fraudulent.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/binary-options-fraud |title=Binary Options Fraud |website=Federal Bureau of Investigation |language=en-us |access-date=2017-05-30}}</ref> The U.S. ] is investigating binary option scams throughout the world, and the Israeli police have tied the industry to criminal syndicates.<ref name="FBI">{{cite news |last1=Weinglass |first1=Simona |authorlink=Simona Weinglass|title=FBI says it's investigating binary options fraud worldwide, invites victims to come forward |url=http://www.timesofisrael.com/fbi-says-its-investigating-binary-options-fraud-worldwide-invites-victims-to-come-forward/ |access-date=February 15, 2017 |work =] |date=February 15, 2017}}</ref><ref name="ToIidesofM"/><ref name=":1" /> The ] (ESMA) has banned retail binary options trading.<ref name="esma.europa.eu">{{Cite web |url=https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esma-agrees-prohibit-binary-options-and-restrict-cfds-protect-retail-investors |title=ESMA agrees to prohibit binary options and restrict CFDs to protect retail investors |website=www.esma.europa.eu|access-date=2019-03-21}}</ref> ] (ASIC) considers binary options as a "high-risk" and "unpredictable" investment option, <ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.ibtimes.com.au/binary-options-trading-australia-how-safe-it-1568192 |title=Binary Options Trading In Australia: How Safe Is It? |date=2018-05-14 |work=International Business Times AU |access-date=2018-05-22 |language=en}}</ref> and finally also banned binary options sale to retail investors in 2021.<ref name="asic.gov.au">{{cite web |url=https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/news-centre/find-a-media-release/2021-releases/21-064mr-asic-bans-the-sale-of-binary-options-to-retail-clients|title=21-064MR ASIC bans the sale of binary options to retail clients |website=]|access-date=8 March 2022}}</ref>
For example, a purchase is made of a binary cash-or-nothing call option on XYZ Corp's stock struck at $100 with a binary payoff of $1000. Then, if at the future ], the stock is trading at or above $100, $1000 is received. If its stock is trading below $100, nothing is received.


The FBI estimates that the scammers steal US$10 billion annually worldwide.<ref name="TimesofI3417">{{cite news |last1 =Weinglass |first1=Simona |title=As Israel-based financial fraud soars, police swoop on 20 suspects as part of global, FBI-led sting |url= http://www.timesofisrael.com/as-israel-based-financial-fraud-soars-police-swoop-on-20-suspects-as-part-of-global-fbi-led-sting/ |access-date=March 4, 2017 |work=The Times of Israel |date=March 4, 2017}}</ref> The use of the names of famous and respectable people such as ] to encourage people to buy fake "investments" is frequent and increasing.<ref name=branson>{{cite news |url= https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/may/17/richard-branson-virgin-says-scammers-are-using-his-name-to-dupe-investors |title=Richard Branson says scammers are using his name to dupe investors |work =The Guardian |date=18 May 2017 |author=Press Association |access-date= 18 May 2017}}</ref> Articles published in '']'' newspaper explain the fraud in detail, using the experience of former insiders such as a job-seeker recruited by a fake binary options broker, who was told to "leave conscience at the door".<ref name="israeltimes1"/><ref name="israeltimes2"/> Following an investigation by ''The Times of Israel'', ] approved a ban on the sale of binary options in June 2017,<ref>{{citation |title=Israel cabinet approves ban on sale of binary options |work =Reuters |author=Tova Cohen |date=June 18, 2017 |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-israel-binaryoptions-lawmaking-idUSKBN19906C |access-date=2017-07-15}}</ref> and a law banning the products was approved by the ] in October 2017.<ref name="AtLast">{{cite news |last1=Weinglass |first1=Simona |title=Israel bans binary options industry, finally closing vast, 10-year fraud |url=https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-bans-entire-binary-options-industry-finally-closing-vast-10-year-fraud/ |access-date=October 24, 2017 |publisher=] |date=October 23, 2017}}</ref><ref name="Knesset ban 10-24-17">{{Cite news |url=https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/business/1.818782 |title=Israel Bans Binary Options Industry That Defrauded Millions |last=Tomer |first=Uri |date=2017-10-24 |work=Haaretz |access-date=2017-10-24 |language=en}}</ref>
In the popular ], the value of a digital option can be expressed in terms of the cumulative normal distribution function.


On January 30, 2018, ] banned advertisements for binary options trading as well as for ] and ]s (ICOs).<ref name="blomm13018">{{cite news |last1=Frier |first1=Sarah |last2=Verhage |first2=Jules |title=Facebook Bans Ads Associated With Cryptocurrencies |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-30/facebook-bans-ads-associated-with-bitcoin-cryptocurrencies |access-date=February 7, 2018 |work =Bloomberg |date=January 30, 2018}}</ref><ref name="FT013018">{{cite news |last1=Cornish |first1=Chloe |title=Facebook and regulators move to halt cryptocurrency scams |url=https://www.ft.com/content/9c1050ca-05f8-11e8-9650-9c0ad2d7c5b5 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210/https://www.ft.com/content/9c1050ca-05f8-11e8-9650-9c0ad2d7c5b5 |archive-date=2022-12-10 |url-access=subscription |access-date=February 7, 2018 |work =]|date=January 30, 2018}}</ref> ] and ] announced similar bans in the following weeks.<ref name="EU1">{{cite news |title=European Union bans binary options, strictly regulates CFDs |url=https://www.timesofisrael.com/european-union-bans-binary-options-strictly-regulates-cfds/ |last1=Weinglass |first1=Simona |date=March 28, 2018 |access-date=March 21, 2019 |publisher=The Times of Israel}}</ref>
==Non exchange-traded binary options==
Binary options contracts have long been available ], i.e. sold directly by the issuer to the buyer. They were generally considered "]" instruments and there was no liquid market for trading these instruments between their issuance and expiration. They were often seen embedded in more complex option contracts.


==Function==
Since mid-2008 binary options web-sites called ] have been offering a simplified version of exchange-traded binary options. It is estimated that around 90 such platforms (including white label products) have been in operation as of January 2012, offering options on some 125 underlying assets. In the new era the worlds leading and most up to date binary options platform as of July 2012 is held by the Business Capital Corporation (B.C.C.) and is called UA Banc (www.uabanc.com) new innovations include take profit and range option is taking the betting/investing world by storm.


Binary options "are based on a simple 'yes' or 'no' proposition: Will an underlying asset be above a certain price at a certain time?"<ref name="investopedia-guide">{{cite web |last1=Mitchell |first1=Cory |title=A Guide To Trading Binary Options In The U.S. |url=https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/061114/guide-trading-binary-options-us.asp |website=Investopedia |access-date=4 May 2018 |date=11 June 2014}}</ref> Traders place wagers as to whether that will or will not happen. If a customer believes the price of an underlying asset will be above a certain price at a set time, the trader buys the binary option, but if he or she believes it will be below that price, they sell the option. In the U.S. exchanges, the price of a binary is always under $100.<ref name="investopedia-guide"/>
==Exchange-traded binary options==
In 2007, the ] proposed a rule change to allow binary options,<ref>Securities and Exchange Commission, Release No. 34-56471; File No. SR-OCC-2007-08, September 19, 2007. “”.</ref> and the ] approved listing cash-or-nothing binary options in 2008.<ref>{{Cite news| url=http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSN0943920080609 | work=Reuters | title=CBOE to list binary options on S&P 500, VIX | first=Doris | last=Frankel | date=June 9, 2008}}</ref> In May 2008, the ] (Amex) launched exchange-traded European cash-or-nothing binary options, and the ] (CBOE) followed in June 2008. The standardization of binary options allows them to be exchange-traded with continuous quotations.


] described the binary options trading process in the U.S. thus:
Amex offers binary options on some ETFs and a few highly liquid equities such as Citigroup and Google.<ref>http://www.amex.com/options/prodInf/OptPiFROs.jsp</ref> Amex calls binary options "Fixed Return Options"; calls are named "Finish High" and puts are named "Finish Low". To reduce the threat of market manipulation of single stocks, Amex FROs use a "settlement index" defined as a volume-weighted average of trades on the expiration day.<ref>http://www.amex.com/options/prodInf/fros.settlementindex.pdf</ref> The American Stock Exchange and ] submitted a patent application for exchange-listed binary options using a volume-weighted settlement index in 2005.<ref></ref>


<blockquote> binary may be trading at $42.50 (bid) and $44.50 (offer) at 1 p.m. If you buy the binary option right then you will pay $44.50, if you decide to sell right then you'll sell at $42.50.
CBOE offers binary options on the ] (SPX) and the ].<ref name="cboebin">http://www.cboe.com/micro/binaries/BinariesQRG.pdf</ref> The tickers for these are BSZ<ref></ref> and BVZ,<ref></ref> respectively. CBOE only offers calls, as binary put options are trivial to ] from binary call options. BSZ strikes are at 5-point intervals and BVZ strikes are at 1-point intervals. The actual underlying to BSZ and BVZ are based on the opening prices of index basket members.


Let's assume you decide to buy at $44.50. If at 1:30 p.m. the price of gold is above $1,250, your option expires and it becomes worth $100. You make a profit of $100 – $44.50 = $55.50 (less fees). This is called being "in the money".
Both Amex and CBOE listed options have values between $0 and $1, with a multiplier of 100, and tick size of $0.01, and are cash settled.<ref name="cboebin" /><ref>http://www.amex.com/options/prodInf/fros.specifications.pdf</ref>


But if the price of gold is below $1,250 at 1:30 p.m., the option expires at $0. Therefore you lose the $44.50 invested. This is called being "out of the money".
In 2009 Nadex, the North American Derivatives Exchange, launched and now offers a suite of binary options vehicles.<ref>http://www.nadex.com/content/files/pressrelease-01.pdf Nadex 2009 Press Release. Retrieved September 20th, 2011</ref> Nadex binary options are available on a range Stock Index Futures, Spot Forex, Commodity Futures, and Economic Events.


The bid and offer fluctuate until the option expires. You can close your position at any time before expiry to lock in a profit or a reduce a loss (compared to letting it expire out of the money).<ref name="investopedia-guide"/></blockquote>
==Example of a Binary Options Trade==


In the U.S., every binary option settles at $100 or $0, $100 if the bet is correct, 0 if it is not.<ref name="investopedia-guide"/>
A trader who thinks that the EUR/USD ] will close at or above 1.2500 at 3:00 p.m. can buy a ] on that outcome. A trader who thinks that the EUR/USD strike price will close at or below 1.2500 at 3:00 p.m. can buy a ] or sell the contract.


In the online binary options industry, where the contracts are sold by a broker to a customer in an ] manner, a different option pricing model is used. Brokers sell binary options at a fixed price (e.g., $100) and offer some fixed percentage return in case of in-the-money settlement. Some brokers, also offer a sort of out-of-money reward to a losing customer. For example, with a win reward of 80%, out-of-money reward of 5%, and the option price of $100, two scenarios are possible. In-the-money settlement pays back the option price of $100 and the reward of $80. In case of loss, the option price is not returned but the out-of-money reward of $5 is granted to the customer.<ref>{{cite web |title=Broker's Edge Calculator |url=https://www.binarytrading.com/brokers-edge-calculator/ |website=BinaryTrading |access-date=4 May 2018}}</ref>
At 2:00 p.m. the EUR/USD ] is 1.2490. the trader believes this will increase, so he buys 10 call options for EUR/USD at or above 1.2500 at 3:00 p.m. at a cost of $40 each.


On non-regulated platforms, client money is not necessarily kept in a trust account, as required by government ], and transactions are not monitored by third parties in order to ensure fair play.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.fma.gv.at/download.php?d=2747 |title=FMA Focus Binary Options and CFDs |publisher=] |format=PDF |access-date=4 May 2018}}</ref>
The risk involved in this trade is known. The trader’s gross profit/loss follows the ‘all or nothing’ principle. He can lose all the money he invested, which in this case is $40 x 10 = $400, or make a gross profit of $100 x 10 = $1000. If the EUR/USD strike price will close at or above 1.2500 at 3:00 p.m. the trader's net profit will be the payoff at expiry minus the cost of the option: $1000 – $400 = $600.


Binary options are often considered a form of gambling rather than investment because of their negative cumulative payout (the brokers have an edge over the investor) and because they are advertised as requiring little or no knowledge of the markets. Gordon Pape, writing in ].com in 2010, called binary options websites "gambling sites, pure and simple", and said "this sort of thing can quickly become addictive... no one, no matter how knowledgeable, can consistently predict what a stock or commodity will do within a short time frame".<ref name="Forbes" />
The trader can also choose to liquidate (buy or sell to close) his position prior to expiration, at which point the option value is not guaranteed to be $100. The larger the gap between the spot price and the strike price, the value of the option decreases, as the option is less likely to expire ].


Pape observed that binary options are poor from a gambling standpoint as well because of the excessive "house edge". One online binary options site paid $71 for each successful $100 trade. "If you lose, you get back $15. Let's say you make 1,000 "trades" and win 545 of them. Your profit is $38,695. But your 455 losses will cost you $38,675. In other words, you must win 54.5% of the time just to break even".<ref name="Forbes">{{Cite news |last= Pape |first= Gordon |title= Don't Gamble On Binary Options |url= https://www.forbes.com/sites/investor/2010/07/27/dont-gamble-on-binary-options/ |work= Forbes.com |date= 27 July 2010 |access-date= 4 May 2018
In this example, at 3:00 p.m. the spot has risen to 1.2505. The option has expired in the money and the gross payoff is $1000. The trader's net profit is $600.
|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130621142514/http://www.forbes.com/sites/investor/2010/07/27/dont-gamble-on-binary-options/print/
|archive-date=2013-06-21}}</ref>


The U.S. ] warns that "some binary options Internet-based trading platforms may overstate the average return on investment by advertising a higher average return on investment than a customer should expect given the payout structure."<ref name="CFTC investor warning">{{cite web |url=https://www.cftc.gov/ConsumerProtection/FraudAwarenessPrevention/CFTCFraudAdvisories/fraudadv_binaryoptions.html |title=CFTC Fraud Advisories |website=www.cftc.gov |publisher=U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission |access-date= 4 May 2018}}</ref>
==Black-Scholes Valuation==

In the ], the price of the option can be found by the formulas below.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Hull |first=John C. |year=2005 |title=Options, Futures and Other Derivatives |publisher=] |isbn=0-13-149908-4}}</ref> In these, ''S'' is the initial stock price, ''K'' denotes the ], ''T'' is the time to maturity, ''q'' is the dividend rate, ''r'' is the ] and <math> \sigma </math> is the ]. <math>\Phi</math> denotes the ] of the ],
==Black–Scholes valuation==
:<math> \Phi(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int_{-\infty}^x e^{-\frac{1}{2} z^2} dz. </math>
In the ], the price of the option can be found by the formulas below.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hull |first=John C. |year=2005 |title=Options, Futures and Other Derivatives |publisher=] |isbn=0-13-149908-4}}</ref> In fact, the ] for the price of a vanilla ] (or ]) can be ] by decomposing a call option into an asset-or-nothing call option minus a cash-or-nothing call option, and similarly for a put – the binary options are easier to analyze, and correspond to the two terms in the Black–Scholes formula.

In these, ''S'' is the initial stock price, ''K'' denotes the ], ''T'' is the time to maturity, ''q'' is the dividend rate, ''r'' is the ] and <math> \sigma </math> is the ]. <math>\Phi</math> denotes the ] of the ],
:<math> \Phi(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int_{-\infty}^x e^{-z^2/2} dz. </math>
and, and,
:<math> d_1 = \frac{\ln\frac{S}{K} + (r-q+\sigma^{2}/2)T}{\sigma\sqrt{T}},\,d_2 = d_1-\sigma\sqrt{T}. \,</math> :<math> d_1 = \frac{\ln\frac{S}{K} + (r-q+\sigma^{2}/2)T}{\sigma\sqrt{T}}. </math>
: <math> d_2 = d_1-\sigma\sqrt{T}. </math>


===Cash-or-nothing call=== ===Cash-or-nothing call===
This pays out one unit of cash if the spot is above the strike at maturity. Its value now is given by, This pays out one unit of cash if the spot is above the strike at maturity. Its value now is given by
:<math> C = e^{-rT}\Phi(d_2). \,</math> :<math> C = e^{-rT}\Phi(d_2). \,</math>


===Cash-or-nothing put=== ===Cash-or-nothing put===
This pays out one unit of cash if the spot is below the strike at maturity. Its value now is given by, This pays out one unit of cash if the spot is below the strike at maturity. Its value now is given by
:<math> P = e^{-rT}\Phi(-d_2). \,</math> :<math> P = e^{-rT}\Phi(-d_2). \,</math>


===Asset-or-nothing call=== ===Asset-or-nothing call===
This pays out one unit of asset if the spot is above the strike at maturity. Its value now is given by, This pays out one unit of asset if the spot is above the strike at maturity. Its value now is given by
:<math> C = Se^{-qT}\Phi(d_1). \,</math> :<math> C = Se^{-qT}\Phi(d_1). \,</math>


===Asset-or-nothing put=== ===Asset-or-nothing put===
This pays out one unit of asset if the spot is below the strike at maturity. Its value now is given by, This pays out one unit of asset if the spot is below the strike at maturity. Its value now is given by:
:<math> P = Se^{-qT}\Phi(-d_1). \,</math> :<math> P = Se^{-qT}\Phi(-d_1). \,</math>

===American style===
]

An ] gives the holder the right to exercise at any point up to and including the expiry time <math>T</math>. That is, denoting by <math>K</math> the strike price, if <math>K\geq S</math> (resp. <math>K\leq S</math>), the corresponding American binary put (resp. call) is worth exactly one unit. Let
:<math> a=\frac{1}{\sigma}\ln(K/S)\text{, }\xi=\frac{r-q}{\sigma}-\frac{\sigma}{2}\text{, and }b=\sqrt{\xi^{2}+2r}. \,</math>
The price of a cash-or-nothing American binary put (resp. call) with strike <math>K<S</math> (resp. <math>K>S</math>) and time-to-expiry <math>T</math> is:
:<math> \frac{1}{2}e^{a\left(\xi-b\right)}\left\{ 1+\operatorname{sgn}(a)\operatorname{erf}\left(\frac{bT-a}{\sqrt{2T}}\right)+e^{2ab}\left\right\} \,</math>
where <math>\operatorname{erf}</math> denotes the ] and <math>\operatorname{sgn}</math> denotes the ]. The above follows immediately from expressions for the Laplace transform of the distribution of the conditional first passage time of Brownian motion to a particular level.<ref>{{Dead link|date=June 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}. parsiad.ca (2015-03-01). Retrieved on 2016-07-18.</ref>


===Foreign exchange=== ===Foreign exchange===
{{Further|Foreign exchange derivative}} {{Further|Foreign exchange derivative}}


If we denote by ''S'' the FOR/DOM exchange rate (i.e. 1 unit of foreign currency is worth S units of domestic currency) we can observe that paying out 1 unit of the domestic currency if the spot at maturity is above or below the strike is exactly like a cash-or nothing call and put respectively. Similarly, paying out 1 unit of the foreign currency if the spot at maturity is above or below the strike is exactly like an asset-or nothing call and put respectively. If we denote by ''S'' the FOR/DOM exchange rate (i.e., 1 unit of foreign currency is worth S units of domestic currency) we can observe that paying out 1 unit of the domestic currency if the spot at maturity is above or below the strike is exactly like a cash-or nothing call and put respectively. Similarly, paying out 1 unit of the foreign currency if the spot at maturity is above or below the strike is exactly like an asset-or nothing call and put respectively.
Hence if we now take <math>r_{FOR}</math>, the foreign interest rate, <math>r_{DOM}</math>, the domestic interest rate, and the rest as above, we get the following results. Hence if we now take <math>r_{\mathrm{FOR}}</math>, the foreign interest rate, <math>r_{DOM}</math>, the domestic interest rate, and the rest as above, we get the following results.


In case of a digital call (this is a call FOR/put DOM) paying out one unit of the domestic currency we get as present value, In case of a digital call (this is a call FOR/put DOM) paying out one unit of the domestic currency we get as present value,
:<math> C = e^{-r_{DOM} T}\Phi(d_2) \,</math> :<math> C = e^{-r_{\mathrm{DOM}} T}\Phi(d_2) \,</math>
In case of a digital put (this is a put FOR/call DOM) paying out one unit of the domestic currency we get as present value, In case of a digital put (this is a put FOR/call DOM) paying out one unit of the domestic currency we get as present value,
:<math> P = e^{-r_{DOM}T}\Phi(-d_2) \,</math> :<math> P = e^{-r_{\mathrm{DOM}}T}\Phi(-d_2) \,</math>
While in case of a digital call (this is a call FOR/put DOM) paying out one unit of the foreign currency we get as present value, While in case of a digital call (this is a call FOR/put DOM) paying out one unit of the foreign currency we get as present value,
:<math> C = Se^{-r_{FOR} T}\Phi(d_1) \,</math> :<math> C = Se^{-r_{\mathrm{FOR}} T}\Phi(d_1) \,</math>
and in case of a digital put (this is a put FOR/call DOM) paying out one unit of the foreign currency we get as present value, and in case of a digital put (this is a put FOR/call DOM) paying out one unit of the foreign currency we get as present value,
:<math> P = Se^{-r_{FOR}T}\Phi(-d_1) \,</math> :<math> P = Se^{-r_{\mathrm{FOR}}T}\Phi(-d_1) \,</math>


===Skew=== ===Skew===
In the standard Black–Scholes model, one can interpret the premium of the binary option in the risk-neutral world as the expected value = probability of being in-the-money * unit, discounted to the present value. The Black–Scholes model relies on symmetry of distribution and ignores the ] of the distribution of the asset. Market makers adjust for such skewness by, instead of using a single standard deviation for the underlying asset <math>\sigma</math> across all strikes, incorporating a variable one <math>\sigma(K)</math> where volatility depends on strike price, thus incorporating the ] into account. The skew matters because it affects the binary considerably more than the regular options.
{{Technical|section|date=March 2012}}
In the standard Black-Scholes model, one can interpret the premium of the binary option in the risk-neutral world as the expected value = probability of being in-the-money * unit, discounted to the present value.


A binary call option is, at long expirations, similar to a tight call spread using two vanilla options. One can model the value of a binary cash-or-nothing option, ''C'', at strike ''K'', as an infinitesimally tight spread, where <math>C_v</math> is a vanilla European call:<ref name="Breeden, D. T. 1978"/><ref name="Gatheral, J. 2006"/>
To take ] into account, a more sophisticated analysis based on call spreads can be used.

A binary call option is, at long expirations, similar to a tight call spread using two vanilla options. One can model the value of a binary cash-or-nothing option, ''C'', at strike ''K'', as an infinitessimally tight spread, where <math>C_v</math> is a vanilla European call:{{Page needed|date=September 2010}},<ref>{{Cite book|last=Taleb |first=Nassim Nicholas |title=] |year=1997 |publisher=Wiley Finance |isbn=0-471-15280-3}}</ref><ref>Lehman Brothers, "Listed Binary Options", July 2008, http://www.cboe.com/Institutional/pdf/ListedBinaryOptions.pdf</ref>
:<math> C = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \frac{C_v(K-\epsilon) - C_v(K)}{\epsilon} </math> :<math> C = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \frac{C_v(K-\epsilon) - C_v(K)}{\epsilon} </math>
Thus, the value of a binary call is the negative of the ] of the price of a vanilla call with respect to strike price: Thus, the value of a binary call is the negative of the ] of the price of a vanilla call with respect to strike price:
Line 85: Line 98:


The first term is equal to the premium of the binary option ignoring skew: The first term is equal to the premium of the binary option ignoring skew:
:<math> -\frac{\partial C_v}{\partial K} = -\frac{\partial (S\Phi(d_1) - Ke^{-rT}\Phi(d_2))}{\partial K} = e^{-rT}\Phi(d_2) = C_{noskew}</math> :<math> -\frac{\partial C_v}{\partial K} = -\frac{\partial (S\Phi(d_1) - Ke^{-rT}\Phi(d_2))}{\partial K} = e^{-rT}\Phi(d_2) = C_{\mathrm{noskew}}</math>


<math>\frac{\partial C_v}{\partial \sigma}</math> is the ] of the vanilla call; <math>\frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial K}</math> is sometimes called the "skew slope" or just "skew". Skew is typically negative, so the value of a binary call is higher when taking skew into account. <math>\frac{\partial C_v}{\partial \sigma}</math> is the ] of the vanilla call; <math>\frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial K}</math> is sometimes called the "skew slope" or just "skew". Skew is typically negative, so the value of a binary call is higher when taking skew into account.
:<math> C = C_{noskew} - Vega_v * Skew</math> :<math> C = C_{\mathrm{noskew}} - \mathrm{Vega}_v * \mathrm{Skew}</math>


===Relationship to vanilla options' Greeks=== ===Relationship to vanilla options' Greeks===
Since a binary call is a mathematical derivative of a vanilla call with respect to strike, the price of a binary call has the same shape as the delta of a vanilla call, and the delta of a binary call has the same shape as the gamma of a vanilla call. Since a binary call is a mathematical derivative of a vanilla call with respect to strike, the price of a binary call has the same shape as the delta of a vanilla call, and the delta of a binary call has the same shape as the gamma of a vanilla call.


==Interpretation of prices== ==Regulation and fraud==
{{further|Securities fraud}}
In a ], binary options are used to find out a population's best estimate of an event occurring - for example, a price of 0.65 on a binary option triggered by the Democratic candidate winning the next US Presidential election can be interpreted as an estimate of 65% likelihood of him winning.


Many binary option "brokers" have been exposed as fraudulent operations.<ref name="SEC1"/> In those cases, there is no real ]; the customer is betting against the broker, who is acting as a ]. Manipulation of price data to cause customers to lose is common. Withdrawals are regularly stalled or refused by such operations; if a client has good reason to expect a payment, the operator will simply stop taking their phone calls.<ref name="israeltimes1">{{cite news | title=The wolves of Tel Aviv: Israel's vast, amoral binary options scam exposed |url= http://www.timesofisrael.com/the-wolves-of-tel-aviv-israels-vast-amoral-binary-options-scam-exposed | date=March 23, 2016 | website=] | last=Weinglass | first=Simona |access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref> Though binary options sometimes trade on ] ], they are generally unregulated, trading on the Internet, and prone to fraud.<ref name="Ipedia"/> Most of the binary options brokers are registered in ] and offering their services globally.{{cn|date=May 2022}} The country's Financial Services Authority has issued a warning to the general public about unlicensed Forex and binary options trading provided by entities registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-02-03 |title=UNLICENSED FOREX/BINARY OPTIONS – Financial Services Authority |url=https://svgfsa.com/unlicensed-forex-binary-options/ |access-date=2022-05-12 |website=svgfsa.com}}</ref>
In financial markets, ]s on a stock or other instrument are already priced into the stock. However, a binary options market provides other information. Just as the regular options market reveals the market's estimate of variance (volatility), i.e. the second ], a binary options market reveals the market's estimate of skew, i.e. the third moment.


=== European Union ===
In theory, a portfolio of binary options can also be used to synthetically recreate (or valuate) any other option
On 23 March 2018, The ], a ] financial regulatory institution and ] located in Paris, agreed to new temporary rules prohibiting the marketing, distribution or sale of binary options to retail clients.<ref name="esma.europa.eu"/>
(analogous to integration), although in practical terms this is not possible due to the lack of depth of the market for these relatively thinly traded securities.


=== Australia ===
In theory a portfolio of options can synthetically recreate any other financial instrument, including conventional options.
The ] (ASIC) warned Australian investors on 13 February 2015 against Opteck, an unlicensed binary option provider.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://asic.gov.au/about-asic/media-centre/find-a-media-release/2015-releases/15-024mr-asic-warns-of-opteck-and-other-unlicensed-binary-option-providers/|title=15-024MR ASIC warns of Opteck and other unlicensed binary option providers|access-date=5 September 2016}}</ref> The ASIC later began a focused effort to control unlicensed derivative providers, including "review" websites, broker affiliates, and managed service providers related to binary option products.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://asic.gov.au/about-asic/media-centre/find-a-media-release/2016-releases/16-218mr-asic-crackdown-on-unlicensed-retail-otc-derivative-providers/|title=16-218MR ASIC crackdown on unlicensed retail OTC derivative providers|access-date=5 September 2016}}</ref> ASIC finally released a ban on sale of binary options to retail clients in 2021.<ref name="asic.gov.au">{{cite web |url=https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/news-centre/find-a-media-release/2021-releases/21-064mr-asic-bans-the-sale-of-binary-options-to-retail-clients|title=21-064MR ASIC bans the sale of binary options to retail clients |website=]|access-date=8 March 2022}}</ref>


=== Belgium ===
==Structured Binary Options Strategies==
In August 2016, Belgium's ] banned binary options schemes, based on concerns about widespread fraud.<ref name="toi3">{{cite news|url=http://www.timesofisrael.com/in-european-first-belgium-bans-binary-options |title=In European first, Belgium bans binary options|date=August 13, 2016|work=The Times of Israel|author1=Weinglass, Simona}}</ref>
It may come as a surprise to many interested in the options space that put options were not introduced on the CBOE until 1977, nine years after call options were. The binary options market at present is in the same 'no-mans-land' where there is a vibrant FX binary options market with sophisticated binary options strategies, while at the other extreme there are a plethora of platforms offering one-hour bets dressing themselves up as 'investments'.<br />
The worlds leading and most up to date platform as of July 2012 is held by the Business Capital Corporation (B.C.C.) and is called UA Banc (www.uabanc.com) new innovations include take profit and range options. Investor specialists at UA Banc are experts at bringing their clients trade volume to the maximum.
But the binary options market too has its range of straddles, strangles, call spreads, butterflies, condors etc.. which as yet have not been explored by the mainstream exchanges. Tunnels, aka rangebets, aka corridors are reasonably well-known and are priced in the manner of a conventional call spread although the tunnel is primarily a volatility trade. Others such as the Eachway Calls & Puts, Tug of War, Accumulators provide a rich seam of varied instruments providing distinct and unique P&L profiles.<br />
As indicated above, binary options are generally perceived as European-style options that cannot be exercised before expiry. The American-style binary options are out there but are usually referred to as one-touch options. A comprehensive list of binary options strategies would include European and American binary options, 'knock-in' binary options, 'knock-out' binary options and two-asset binary options.


==References== === Canada ===
No firms are registered in Canada to offer or sell binary options, so no binary options trading is currently allowed. Provincial regulators have proposed a complete ban on all binary options trading include a ban on online advertising for binary options trading sites.<ref name="finpost">{{cite news| last1=Shecter|first1=Barbara|title=Canadian watchdogs move to ban binary options as fraudulent schemes fleece investors, steal identities|url=http://business.financialpost.com/news/fp-street/canadian-watchdogs-move-to-ban-binary-options-amid-losses-identity-theft|access-date=April 26, 2017|work =Financial Post|date=April 26, 2017}}</ref> A complete ban on binary options trading for options having an expiration less than 30 days was announced on September 28, 2017.<ref>{{cite news|title=Securities regulatory group announces ban on short-term binary options|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/binary-options-ban-1.4311863|access-date=September 28, 2017|work =CBC News|date=September 28, 2017}}</ref>
{{Reflist}}

=== Cyprus ===
On May 3, 2012, the ] (CySEC) announced a policy change regarding the classification of binary options as ]s. The effect is that binary options platforms operating in Cyprus, where many of the platforms are now based, would have to be CySEC regulated within six months of the date of the announcement. CySEC was the first EU ]-member regulator to treat binary options as financial instruments.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.cysec.gov.cy/Downloads/English/Announcements/2012/EPEY/Announcement%20%2005.03.2012%20regarding%20the%20supervision%20of%20Binary%20Options.pdf|title=regarding the supervision of Binary Options|date=3 May 2012|work=CySEC|access-date=4 June 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120710013624/http://www.cysec.gov.cy/Downloads/English/Announcements/2012/EPEY/Announcement%20%2005.03.2012%20regarding%20the%20supervision%20of%20Binary%20Options.pdf|archive-date=2012-07-10|url-status=dead}}</ref>

In 2013, CySEC prevailed over the disreputable binary options brokers and communicated intensively with traders in order to prevent the risks of using unregulated financial services. On September 19, 2013, CySEC sent out a press release warning investors against binary options broker TraderXP, who was not and had never been licensed by CySEC.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cysec.gov.cy/Downloads/Investors/%CE%A0%CF%81%CE%BF%CE%B5%CE%B9%CE%B4%CE%BF%CF%80%CE%BF%CE%B9%CE%AE%CF%83%CE%B5%CE%B9%CF%82%20-%20%CE%95_%CE%9A_/2013_/19%20September%202013%20regarding%20warning%20TRADERXP%20LTD.pdf|title=Warning|access-date=27 March 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140407072836/http://www.cysec.gov.cy/Downloads/Investors/%CE%A0%CF%81%CE%BF%CE%B5%CE%B9%CE%B4%CE%BF%CF%80%CE%BF%CE%B9%CE%AE%CF%83%CE%B5%CE%B9%CF%82%20-%20%CE%95_%CE%9A_/2013_/19%20September%202013%20regarding%20warning%20TRADERXP%20LTD.pdf|archive-date=2014-04-07|url-status=dead}}</ref>
On October 18, 2013, CySEC released an investor warning about binary options broker NRGbinary and its parent company NRG Capital (CY) Ltd., stating that NRGbinary was not and had never been licensed by CySEC.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cysec.gov.cy/Downloads/Investors/%CE%A0%CF%81%CE%BF%CE%B5%CE%B9%CE%B4%CE%BF%CF%80%CE%BF%CE%B9%CE%AE%CF%83%CE%B5%CE%B9%CF%82%20-%20%CE%95_%CE%9A_/2013_/Warning%2010.18.2013%20re%20NRG%20Capital%20CY%20LTD.pdf|title=Warning|access-date=27 March 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140331035912/http://www.cysec.gov.cy/Downloads/Investors/%CE%A0%CF%81%CE%BF%CE%B5%CE%B9%CE%B4%CE%BF%CF%80%CE%BF%CE%B9%CE%AE%CF%83%CE%B5%CE%B9%CF%82%20-%20%CE%95_%CE%9A_/2013_/Warning%2010.18.2013%20re%20NRG%20Capital%20CY%20LTD.pdf|archive-date=2014-03-31|url-status=dead}}</ref>

CySEC also temporarily suspended the license of the Cedar Finance on December 19, 2013, because the potential violations referenced appeared to seriously endanger the interests of the company's customers and the proper functioning of capital markets, as described in the official issued press release. CySEC also issued a warning against binary option broker PlanetOption at the end of the year and another warning against binary option broker LBinary on January 10, 2014, pointing out that it was not regulated by the Commission and the Commission had not received any notification by any of its counterparts in other European countries to the effect of this firm being a regulated provider.

The Cyprus regulator imposed a penalty of €15,000 against ZoomTrader. OptionBravo and ChargeXP were also financially penalized. CySEC also indicated that it had voted to reject the ShortOption license application.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bonusbinaryoptions.net/the-projects-of-the-cysec-regulator-in-terms-of-binary-options-in-2014|title=The projects of the CySEC regulator in terms of binary options in 2014|access-date=27 March 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171015095137/http://www.bonusbinaryoptions.net/the-projects-of-the-cysec-regulator-in-terms-of-binary-options-in-2014|archive-date=15 October 2017|url-status=dead}}</ref>

In 2015, CySEC repeatedly fined Banc De Binary for several violations including the solicitation of U.S. clients.<ref>, Finance Magnates.</ref> In 2016, the regulator fined Banc De Binary Ltd once again for violation of its legislation. The broker has come to a settlement of €350,000.<ref>, Finance Magnates</ref>

=== France ===
In August 2016, France's ''Sapin II'' bill on transparency was announced by the ] (AMF), seeking to outlaw all financial derivatives advertising. The AMF stated that it would ban the advertising of certain highly speculative and risky financial contracts to private individuals by electronic means.<ref>{{citation|type=press release|title=Ban on the advertising of forex products, binary options and some CFDs: AMF launches consultation on changes to its General Regulation|date=August 1, 2016|work=Autorité des Marchés Financiers|url=http://www.amf-france.org/en_US/Actualites/Communiques-de-presse/AMF/annee-2016.html?docId=workspace%3A%2F%2FSpacesStore%2Fad42eecc-9720-49da-82a8-2ddcb72fbf1d|access-date=January 15, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190617015956/https://www.amf-france.org/en_US/Actualites/Communiques-de-presse/AMF/annee-2016.html?docId=workspace%3A%2F%2FSpacesStore%2Fad42eecc-9720-49da-82a8-2ddcb72fbf1d|archive-date=June 17, 2019|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://financefeeds.com/ig-group-officially-responds-french-fx-cfd-advertising-ban/ |title=IG Group officially responds to French FX and CFD advertising ban |work=Finance Feeds |date=9 January 2017 |author=Andrew Saks-McLeod |access-date=18 May 2017 |archive-date=3 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170903034136/https://financefeeds.com/ig-group-officially-responds-french-fx-cfd-advertising-ban/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> The document applies specifically to binary options, and to ] (CFDs), and financial contracts on currencies. The French regulator is determined to cooperate with the legal authorities to have illegal websites blocked.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://financefeeds.com/breaking-amf-toughens-stance-advertising-following-public-consultation/|title=AMF toughens its stance on advertising following public consultation|work=Finance Feeds|date=10 January 2017|author=Maria Nikolova|access-date=18 May 2017|archive-date=7 May 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170507140401/http://financefeeds.com/breaking-amf-toughens-stance-advertising-following-public-consultation/|url-status=dead}}</ref> The law also prohibits all forms of sponsorship and partnership that results in direct or indirect advertising of the financial products it covers. This ban was seen by industry watchers as having an impact on sponsored sports such as European football clubs.<ref>{{citation|title=French football clubs rush to terminate binary options partnerships|quote=Under Article 77 of the Sapin II law, football teams have until the end of June this year to terminate all sponsorships|author=Maria Nikolova|work=Finance Feeds|url=http://financefeeds.com/french-football-clubs-rush-terminate-binary-options-partnerships/|access-date=2017-01-15|archive-date=2019-06-17|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190617015948/https://financefeeds.com/french-football-clubs-rush-terminate-binary-options-partnerships/|url-status=dead}}</ref>

The Cyprus-based company 24Option<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://cyprusregistry.com/companies/EE/41700|title=24OPTION - Cyprus Business Name - CyprusRegistry.com|website=cyprusregistry.com|access-date=2019-04-17}}</ref> was banned from trading in France by AMF earlier in 2016.<ref>{{citation|type=press release|title=L'Autorité des marchés financiers interdit à Rodeler Limited (" 24option ") de fournir des services sur le territoire français|trans-title=Autorité des Marchés Financiers halts Rodeler Limited ("24option") activities in France|date=July 29, 2016|publisher=Autorité des Marchés Financiers|url=http://www.amf-france.org/Actualites/Communiques-de-presse/AMF/annee-2016.html?docId=workspace%3A%2F%2FSpacesStore%2Ff35a247e-e20d-42c3-8b3d-b354794a2a70|access-date=January 15, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190617015955/https://www.amf-france.org/Actualites/Communiques-de-presse/AMF/annee-2016.html?docId=workspace%3A%2F%2FSpacesStore%2Ff35a247e-e20d-42c3-8b3d-b354794a2a70|archive-date=June 17, 2019|url-status=dead}}</ref> They had sponsored a well-known Irish ], ], who in turn promoted the company through social media.<ref>{{citation|title=Conor McGregor sponsor barred from operating in France|work=Irish Times|date=November 19, 2016|author=Barry O'Halloran|url=http://www.irishtimes.com/business/media-and-marketing/conor-mcgregor-sponsor-barred-from-operating-in-france-1.2874175}}</ref>

=== Germany ===

German ] (BaFin) has been regularly publishing investor warnings. On November 29, 2018, BaFin announced that it is planning to "prohibit the marketing, distribution and sale of binary options to retail clients at a national level".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Veroeffentlichungen/EN/Pressemitteilung/2018/pm_181129_binaere_optionen_en.html | title=BaFin plans national prohibition of binary options for retail clients | date=November 29, 2018 | publisher= ] | access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref>

=== Indonesia ===
According to the Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (CoFTRA) in Indonesia, also known as BAPPEBTI, binary options are considered a form of online gambling and is illegal in the country. The move to delegalize binary options stems from concerns that the public may be swayed by misleading advertisements, promotions, and offers to participate in fraudulent practices that operate under the guise of binary options trading.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Dirgantara|first=Hikma|date=2022-02-03|title=Bappebti Blokir 92 Entitas Binary Option di 2021, Termasuk Binomo, IQ Option|url=https://investasi.kontan.co.id/news/bappebti-blokir-92-entitas-binary-option-di-2021-termasuk-binomo-iq-option|access-date=2022-02-07|website=Kontan.co.id|language=id}}</ref> As of 2 February 2022, at least 92 binary options websites, including Binomo, IQ Option, and Olymp Trade, have been classified as unlicensed operators and blocked by the Indonesian government.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2022-02-04|title=Indonesian regulators block illegal trading websites following complaints on social media|url=https://kr-asia.com/indonesian-regulators-block-illegal-trading-websites-following-complaints-on-social-media|access-date=2022-02-07|website=KrASIA|language=en}}</ref>

=== Israel ===
;Binary options trading
In March 2016 binary options trading within ] was banned by the ], on the grounds that such trading is essentially gambling and not a form of investment management. The ban was extended to overseas clients as well in October 2017.<ref name="AtLast"/><ref name="TOI061817">{{cite news|last1=Weinglass|first1=Simona|title=Israeli ministers approve bill to outlaw entire binary options industry|url=http://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-ministers-approve-bill-to-outlaw-entire-binary-options-industry |access-date=June 19, 2017|website=] |date=June 18, 2017}}</ref><ref name="Globes 12-15-16">{{cite news| url= http://www.globes.co.il/en/article-binary-options-worth-125b-to-israel-gdp-in-2016-1001166968|title=Binary options worth $1.25b to Israel's GDP in 2016| date=15 December 2016|work=]|last1=Tsipori|first1=Tali|access-date=17 December 2016}}</ref> It was approved by the ] in October, despite strong opposition from the binary options industry.<ref name="Knesset ban 10-24-17"/>

;Fraud
In 2016 '']'' ran several articles on binary options fraud. "The wolves of Tel Aviv: Israel's vast, amoral binary options scam exposed" revealed that the industry is a scam.<ref name="israeltimes1" /> A second article describes in detail how a binary options salesman fleeced clients. "According to one ex-employee of a firm that employs over 1,000 people in a high-rise office building in ], losses are guaranteed because the 'dealing room' at the binary options firm controls the trading platform — like the crooked ownership of a rigged ] manipulating the ]".<ref name="israeltimes2">{{cite news | url =http://www.timesofisrael.com/ex-binary-options-salesman-heres-how-we-fleece-the-clients/ |title = Ex-binary options salesman: Here's how we fleece the clients | work =The Times of Israel |author1=Weinglass, Simona |author2=Horovitz, David |name-list-style=amp| date=April 7, 2016 }}</ref>

In July 2016 the Israeli binary option firms Vault Options and Global Trader 365 were ordered by the ] to pay more than $4.5 million for unlawful off-exchange binary options trading, fraud, and registration violations. The companies were also banned permanently from operating in the United States or selling to U.S. residents.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/pr7414-16|title= Federal Court Orders Israeli Web-based Firms, Vault Options, Ltd. and Global Trader 365, to Pay More than $4.5 Million for Unlawful Off-Exchange Binary Options Trading, Fraud, and Registration Violations|date=July 28, 2016|publisher=Commodities and Futures Trading Commission}}</ref>

In November 2016 the ] carried out a raid on the ] offices of binary option broker iTrader. The CEO and six other employees were charged with fraud, providing unlicensed investment advice, and obstruction of justice.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-authorities-raid-binary-options-firm-arrest-ceo-salespeople |title=Israeli authorities raid binary options firm, arrest CEO, salespeople|date=November 12, 2016|work=The Times of Israel|author1=Weinglass, Simona|author2=Horovitz, David}}</ref>

On May 15, 2017, Eliran Saada, the owner of ], which has operated the binary options companies InsideOption and SecuredOptions, was arrested on suspicion of fraud, false accounting, forgery, ], and ]. The case involves a Singaporean woman who claims to have lost over $500,000 to the firm.<ref name="TOI050517">{{cite news|last1=Weinglass|first1=Simona|title=Tel Aviv binary options boss nabbed for fraud, extortion; company raided, computers confiscated|url=http://www.timesofisrael.com/tel-aviv-binary-options-boss-nabbed-for-fraud-extortion-company-raided-computers-confiscated/|access-date=May 16, 2017|work=]|date=May 16, 2017}}</ref><ref name="Roy050517">{{cite news|last1=Cohen|first1=Tova|title=Israeli police arrest owner of binary options firm accused of fraud|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/israel-binaryoptions-idUSL8N1II24I|access-date=May 16, 2017|work=]|date=May 16, 2017}}</ref>

In August 2017 ] superintendent Rafi Biton said that the binary trading industry had "turned into a monster". He told the Israeli ] that criminal investigations had begun.<ref name=":1">{{Cite news|url=https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/business/1.804915|title=In First, Israel Police Admit Crime Syndicates Are Behind Binary Options Industry|last=Appelberg|first=Shelly|date=2017-08-03|work=Haaretz|access-date=2017-10-24|language=en}}</ref>

In September 2017, the FBI arrested Lee Elbaz, CEO of binary options trading company Yukom Communications, upon her arrival in the United States. They arrested her for ] and conspiracy to commit wire fraud.<ref name="Matts092417">{{cite news |last1=Staff|first1=Tori|title=FBI arrests Israeli binary options CEO as she disembarks El Al flight at JFK|url=https://www.timesofisrael.com/fbi-arrests-israeli-binary-options-ceo-as-she-disembarks-el-al-flight-at-jfk/|work =The Times of Israel|date=September 24, 2017|access-date=September 24, 2017}}</ref> In 2019, Lee Elbaz was found guilty and sentenced to 22 years in prison.<ref>{{cite news |title=Former CEO of Israeli Company Sentenced to 22 Years in Prison for Orchestrating Major International Binary Options Fraud Scheme|url=https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-ceo-israeli-company-sentenced-22-years-prison-orchestrating-major-international-binary/|work =Department of Justice|date=December 19, 2019|access-date=August 19, 2022}}</ref>

In February 2019, the FBI arrested Austin Smith, founder of Wealth Recovery International, after his arrival in the United States. Smith was arrested for ] due to his involvement as an employee of Binarybook.com.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-american-claiming-to-help-binary-options-victims-pleads-guilty-to-fraud/|title=Israeli-American claiming to help binary options victims pleads guilty to fraud|first=Simona|last=Weinglass|website=www.timesofisrael.com}}</ref>

===Malta===
In March 2013 the ] (MFSA) announced that binary options regulation would be transferred away from Malta's Lottery and Gaming Authority.<ref>, ''Finance Magnates''</ref> On 18 June 2013 MFSA confirmed that in their view binary options fell under the scope of the ] (MiFID), which made Malta the second ] jurisdiction to regulate binary options as a financial instrument. This required providers to obtain a category 3 Investment Services license and conform to MiFID's ]s; firms could previously operate from the jurisdiction with a valid Lottery and Gaming Authority license.<ref>{{cite news|url= http://www.financemagnates.com/forex/regulation/malta-the-next-cyprus-mfsa-announces-regulatory-framework-for-binary-options/|title=Malta The Next Cyprus? MFSA Announces Regulatory Framework For Binary Options|date=July 18, 2013|work =Finance Magnates}}</ref>

=== New Zealand ===
In April 2017, ]'s ] (FMA) announced that all brokers that offer short-term investment instruments that settle within three days are required to obtain a license from the agency.<ref>{{Cite web| url= https://fma.govt.nz/news/media-releases/fma-confirms-short-term-derivatives-to-be-licensed |title=FMA confirms short-term derivatives to be licensed {{!}} FMA|website=fma.govt.nz|language=en|access-date=2017-04-18}}</ref> This is intended to cover binary options as well as ] (CFDs).

===United Kingdom===
;Binary options trading
In the UK, binary options were regulated by the ] rather than the ] (FCA).<ref name=ftfca>{{cite web | url=https://www.ft.com/content/d493d457-9d93-3b9f-9d05-a09774f4b95a |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210/https://www.ft.com/content/d493d457-9d93-3b9f-9d05-a09774f4b95a |archive-date=2022-12-10 |url-access=subscription | title=FCA warns on illegal binary options providers | date=January 12, 2018 | last=Murphy | first=Hannah | newspaper=] | access-date=December 8, 2018}}{{subscription required}}</ref> This regulation, however, applied only to firms that have gambling equipment in the UK.<ref name=ftadvisor2017>{{cite web|url=https://www.ftadviser.com/investments/2017/11/15/fca-warns-investors-against-binary-options/ | title=FCA warns investors against binary options | date=November 15, 2017 | last=Fantato|first=Damian|website=FTAdviser|access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref> The FCA in 2016 did propose bringing binary options under its jurisdiction and restricting them. They stated that binary options "did not appear to meet a genuine investment need".<ref name="FT10192017">{{cite news|last1=Murphy|first1=Hannah|title=Police launch raids on 20 City of London businesses|url=https://www.ft.com/content/f5cf9ff2-b4d2-11e7-a398-73d59db9e399 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210/https://www.ft.com/content/f5cf9ff2-b4d2-11e7-a398-73d59db9e399 |archive-date=2022-12-10 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=October 21, 2017|newspaper =]|date=October 19, 2017}}{{subscription required}}</ref> In March 2017, ] issued a warning on binary options.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.actionfraud.police.uk/news/what-is-binary-options-fraud-and-what-are-the-law-enforcement-doing-about-it | title=What is Binary Options Fraud and what are the law enforcement doing about it? | date=March 31, 2017 | publisher=] | access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref>

The ], a self-governing Crown dependency for which the UK is responsible, has issued licenses to companies offering binary options as "games of skill" licensed and regulated under fixed odds betting by the ] (GSC).<ref>{{cite web | url =https://www.gov.im/categories/business-and-industries/gambling-and-e-gaming/licence-holders/ | title =Licence holders | website =gov.im | publisher =Isle of Man Government | access-date =2017-09-02}}</ref> This positions binary options as a form of gambling, and the administrator of the trading as something akin to a casino, as opposed to an ] or ].

On October 19, 2017, ] raided 20 binary options firms in London.<ref name="FT10192017"/> On January 3, 2018, the FCA took over regulation of binary options from the Gambling Commission.<ref name=ftfca /> In December 2018, FCA has proposed new rules which would permanently ban the sale, marketing and distribution of binary options to retail consumers.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ftadviser.com/regulation/2018/12/07/fca-to-permanently-restrict-binary-options-sales/ | title=FCA to permanently restrict binary options sales | date=December 7, 2018 | last=Fantato|first=Damian|website=FTAdviser|access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref>

;Fraud
Fraud within the market is rife, with many binary options providers using the names of famous and respectable people without their knowledge. According to a national fraud and cybercrime reporting centre ], 664 binary options frauds were reported in 2015/16, increasing to 1,474 in 2016/17. The ] in May 2017 said that reported losses for the previous financial year were £13 million, increased from £2 million the year before.<ref name=branson/> In the first half of 2017, 697 people reported losses totaling over £18 million.<ref name="FT10192017"/>

=== United States ===
;Binary options trading

In the United States, the ] (SEC) approved ] binary options in 2008.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSN0943920080609|title=CBOE to list binary options on S&P 500, VIX |last=Frankel |first = Doris |date=June 9, 2008 | publisher=] | access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref> Trading commenced on the ] (MYSEA) and the ] (CBOE) in May and June 2008.<ref name=leapinfo>{{cite web | url=https://www.leaprate.com/news/the-history-of-binary-options-trading-infographic/ | title=The History of Binary Options Trading – Infographic | date=January 5, 2017 | website=leaprate.com | access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref>

The MYSEA offers binary options on some ]s and a few highly liquid equities such as ] and ]. On the exchange binary options were called "fixed return options" (FROs). To reduce the threat of ] of single stocks, FROs use a "settlement index" defined as a volume-weighted average of trades on the expiration day. MYSEA and ] submitted a ] for exchange-listed binary options using a volume-weighted settlement index in 2005.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090218165844/http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?wo=2005069978 |date=2009-02-18 }}, World Intellectual Property Organization filing. Retrieved on 2013-01-12.</ref> CBOE offers binary options on the ] (SPX) and the ].<ref name="cboebin">{{cite web| url=http://www.cboe.com/micro/binaries/BinariesQRG.pdf | title=CBOE Introduces Binary Options on SPX SM and VIX | date=September 10, 2008 | publisher=] | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080910044859/http://www.cboe.com/micro/binaries/BinariesQRG.pdf | archive-date=September 10, 2008 | access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref> The tickers for these are BSZ<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cboe.com/delayedquote/detailed-quotes?ticker=BSZ | title=^BSZ (CBOE Binary Options On The S&P 500 Index) | date=December 8, 2018 | publisher=] | access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref> and BVZ, respectively.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.cboe.com/delayedquote/detailed-quotes?ticker=BVZ | title=^BVZ (CBOE Binary Options Volatility) | date=December 8, 2018 | publisher=] | access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref>

], a U.S.-based ] (CFTC) regulated exchange, launched binary options for a range of ], ], and ]' markets in June 2009,.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nadex.com/content/files/pressrelease-01.pdf|title=Nadex, North American derivatives exchange rolls out new trading platform, products|date=June 22, 2009|publisher=]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120401080606/http://www.nadex.com/content/files/pressrelease-01.pdf|archive-date=April 1, 2012|access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref> On March 30, 2010 the CFTC issued an amended Order of Designation to allow trades on NADEX to be intermediated.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://sirt.cftc.gov/SIRT/SIRT.aspx?Topic=TradingOrganizationsAD&Key=34536|title=- CFTC|website=sirt.cftc.gov|access-date=2019-03-21}}</ref> NADEX have since offered binary options trading between buyers and sellers. They do not participate in the trades.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nadex.com/why-nadex/regulated-and-legal-for-us-residents|title=Regulated & Legal for US Residents|date=2015-09-24|website=Nadex|language=en|access-date=2019-03-21}}</ref>

;Fraud

On June 6, 2013, the U.S. CFTC and the SEC jointly issued an Investor Alert to warn about fraudulent promotional schemes involving binary options and binary options trading platforms. The two agencies said that they had received numerous complaints of fraud about binary options trading sites, "including refusal to credit customer accounts or reimburse funds to customers; ]; and manipulation of software to generate losing trades". Other binary options operations were violating requirements to register with regulators.<ref name="CFTC investor warning" /><ref name="SEC1">{{cite web| url=https://www.sec.gov/investor/alerts/ia_binary.pdf | title = Investor Alert Binary Options and Fraud | publisher=] | access-date = December 8, 2018}}</ref>

In June 2013, U.S. regulators charged Israeli-Cypriot company ] with illegally selling binary options to U.S. investors.<ref name="CFTC investor warning" /><ref name=":0">{{cite web|url=https://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1365171575220#.U4Au_ygVcWQ|title=SEC Warns Investors About Binary Options and Charges Cyprus-Based Company with Selling Them Illegally in U.S.|publisher=] | access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref> In February 2016, the company reached an $11 million settlement with U.S. authorities. Regulators found the company used a "virtual office" in New York's ] in pursuit of its scheme, evading a ban on off-exchange binary option contracts. The company neither admitted nor denied the allegations.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/banc-de-binary-reaches-11-million-settlement-with-u-s-authorities-1456409180 |title = Banc de Binary Reaches $11 Million Settlement with U.S. Authorities |newspaper = ] | date=February 25, 2016 | last=Patrick | first=Margot |access-date=December 8, 2018}}{{subscription required}}</ref> In November 2016, SEC published yet another Investor Alert on binary options websites.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.sec.gov/oiea/investor-alerts-bulletins/ia_binaryoptions.html | title=Investor Alert: Binary Options Websites May Be Used for Fraudulent Schemes | date=November 10, 2016 | publisher=] | access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref> In 2016,

In February 2017 '']'' reported that the FBI was conducting an active international investigation of binary option fraud, emphasizing its international nature, saying that the agency was "not limited to the USA". Victims from around the world were asked to contact an FBI field office or the FBI's ]. The investigation is not limited to the binary options brokers, but is comprehensive and could include companies that provide services that allow the industry to operate. ] issuers will be informed of the fraudulent nature of much of the industry, which could possibly allow victims to receive a ], or refund, of fraudulently obtained money.<ref name="FBI"/>

On March 13, 2017, the FBI reiterated its warning, declaring that the "perpetrators behind many of the binary options websites, primarily criminals located overseas, are only interested in one thing—taking your money". They also provide a checklist on how to avoid being victimized.<ref name="FBI2">{{cite web|title=Binary Options Fraud, A Word of Warning to the Investing Public|url=https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/binary-options-fraud|website=FBI.gov|publisher=]|access-date=March 14, 2017|date=March 13, 2017}}</ref><ref name="ToIidesofM">{{cite news|last1=Weinglass|first1=Simona |title=FBI places public warning against 'Binary Options Fraud' at top of its main news |url = http://www.timesofisrael.com/fbi-places-public-warning-against-binary-options-fraud-at-top-of-its-main-website/|access-date=March 15, 2017|website =]|date=March 15, 2017}}</ref>

There is also a popular binary options recovery services scam, where fraudsters promise to "hunt" down the binary options scammers and retrieve the money from them through legal methods.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.financemagnates.com/binary-options/analysis/scamming-the-scammed-recovery-experts-target-binary-options-victims/ | title =Scamming the Scammed – 'Recovery Experts' Target Binary Options Victims | last=Kimberley | first=David | website=Finance Magnates | date=July 27, 2018 | access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thatsucks.com/recovery-services-the-real-story/ | title= Binary Options Recovery Services – The Real Story | last=Kay | first=Martin | date=December 5, 2018 | website=thatsucks.com | access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref> In January 2018, Boston federal prosecutors filed a complaint against Leonel Alexis Valerio Santana and Frank Gregory Cedeno, accusing them of such type of fraud.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-fraud-sec/u-s-charges-two-over-fraud-featuring-bogus-sec-employees-idUSKBN1FC38F | title=U.S. charges two over fraud featuring bogus SEC employees | date=January 24, 2018 | publisher=] | access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref> In August 2018, Santana was sentenced to 63 months in prison, three years of supervised release, and ordered to pay restitution of $105,869 (Cedeno was indicted in March and pleaded not guilty).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://patch.com/massachusetts/boston/man-gets-5-years-prison-boston-dominican-sec-email-scam | title=Man Gets 5+ Years Prison For Boston, Dominican SEC Email Scam | last=Fisher | first=Jenna |date=August 16, 2018|website=] | access-date=December 8, 2018}}</ref>

== See also ==
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]

== References ==
{{Reflist|30em}}

==Further reading==
*{{cite news |last1=Horovitz |first1=David |last2=Weinglass |first2=Simona |title=Ahead of fraud trial, US lays bare 'multitude of lies' of Israeli binary options |url=https://www.timesofisrael.com/ahead-of-fraud-trial-us-lays-bare-multitude-of-lies-of-israeli-binary-options/ |access-date=10 July 2019 |publisher=The Times of Israel |date=10 July 2019}}

== External links ==
*
*
*{{cite news|last1=Levy-Weinrib|first1=Ela|title=Regulator seeks blanket binary options ban|url=http://www.globes.co.il/en/article-regulator-seeks-blanket-binary-options-prohibition-1001175186|access-date=May 6, 2018|publisher=] English|date=February 2, 2017}}

{{Derivatives market}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Binary Option}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Binary Option}}
] ]
] ]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 12:29, 24 October 2024

Financial exotic option with an all-or-nothing payoff

A binary option is a financial exotic option in which the payoff is either some fixed monetary amount or nothing at all. The two main types of binary options are the cash-or-nothing binary option and the asset-or-nothing binary option. The former pays some fixed amount of cash if the option expires in-the-money while the latter pays the value of the underlying security. They are also called all-or-nothing options, digital options (more common in forex/interest rate markets), and fixed return options (FROs) (on the NYSE American).

While binary options may be used in theoretical asset pricing, they are prone to fraud in their applications and hence banned by regulators in many jurisdictions as a form of gambling. Many binary option outlets have been exposed as fraudulent. The U.S. FBI is investigating binary option scams throughout the world, and the Israeli police have tied the industry to criminal syndicates. The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has banned retail binary options trading. Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) considers binary options as a "high-risk" and "unpredictable" investment option, and finally also banned binary options sale to retail investors in 2021.

The FBI estimates that the scammers steal US$10 billion annually worldwide. The use of the names of famous and respectable people such as Richard Branson to encourage people to buy fake "investments" is frequent and increasing. Articles published in The Times of Israel newspaper explain the fraud in detail, using the experience of former insiders such as a job-seeker recruited by a fake binary options broker, who was told to "leave conscience at the door". Following an investigation by The Times of Israel, Israel's cabinet approved a ban on the sale of binary options in June 2017, and a law banning the products was approved by the Knesset in October 2017.

On January 30, 2018, Facebook banned advertisements for binary options trading as well as for cryptocurrencies and initial coin offerings (ICOs). Google and Twitter announced similar bans in the following weeks.

Function

Binary options "are based on a simple 'yes' or 'no' proposition: Will an underlying asset be above a certain price at a certain time?" Traders place wagers as to whether that will or will not happen. If a customer believes the price of an underlying asset will be above a certain price at a set time, the trader buys the binary option, but if he or she believes it will be below that price, they sell the option. In the U.S. exchanges, the price of a binary is always under $100.

Investopedia described the binary options trading process in the U.S. thus:

binary may be trading at $42.50 (bid) and $44.50 (offer) at 1 p.m. If you buy the binary option right then you will pay $44.50, if you decide to sell right then you'll sell at $42.50.

Let's assume you decide to buy at $44.50. If at 1:30 p.m. the price of gold is above $1,250, your option expires and it becomes worth $100. You make a profit of $100 – $44.50 = $55.50 (less fees). This is called being "in the money".

But if the price of gold is below $1,250 at 1:30 p.m., the option expires at $0. Therefore you lose the $44.50 invested. This is called being "out of the money".

The bid and offer fluctuate until the option expires. You can close your position at any time before expiry to lock in a profit or a reduce a loss (compared to letting it expire out of the money).

In the U.S., every binary option settles at $100 or $0, $100 if the bet is correct, 0 if it is not.

In the online binary options industry, where the contracts are sold by a broker to a customer in an OTC manner, a different option pricing model is used. Brokers sell binary options at a fixed price (e.g., $100) and offer some fixed percentage return in case of in-the-money settlement. Some brokers, also offer a sort of out-of-money reward to a losing customer. For example, with a win reward of 80%, out-of-money reward of 5%, and the option price of $100, two scenarios are possible. In-the-money settlement pays back the option price of $100 and the reward of $80. In case of loss, the option price is not returned but the out-of-money reward of $5 is granted to the customer.

On non-regulated platforms, client money is not necessarily kept in a trust account, as required by government financial regulation, and transactions are not monitored by third parties in order to ensure fair play.

Binary options are often considered a form of gambling rather than investment because of their negative cumulative payout (the brokers have an edge over the investor) and because they are advertised as requiring little or no knowledge of the markets. Gordon Pape, writing in Forbes.com in 2010, called binary options websites "gambling sites, pure and simple", and said "this sort of thing can quickly become addictive... no one, no matter how knowledgeable, can consistently predict what a stock or commodity will do within a short time frame".

Pape observed that binary options are poor from a gambling standpoint as well because of the excessive "house edge". One online binary options site paid $71 for each successful $100 trade. "If you lose, you get back $15. Let's say you make 1,000 "trades" and win 545 of them. Your profit is $38,695. But your 455 losses will cost you $38,675. In other words, you must win 54.5% of the time just to break even".

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission warns that "some binary options Internet-based trading platforms may overstate the average return on investment by advertising a higher average return on investment than a customer should expect given the payout structure."

Black–Scholes valuation

In the Black–Scholes model, the price of the option can be found by the formulas below. In fact, the Black–Scholes formula for the price of a vanilla call option (or put option) can be interpreted by decomposing a call option into an asset-or-nothing call option minus a cash-or-nothing call option, and similarly for a put – the binary options are easier to analyze, and correspond to the two terms in the Black–Scholes formula.

In these, S is the initial stock price, K denotes the strike price, T is the time to maturity, q is the dividend rate, r is the risk-free interest rate and σ {\displaystyle \sigma } is the volatility. Φ {\displaystyle \Phi } denotes the cumulative distribution function of the normal distribution,

Φ ( x ) = 1 2 π x e z 2 / 2 d z . {\displaystyle \Phi (x)={\frac {1}{\sqrt {2\pi }}}\int _{-\infty }^{x}e^{-z^{2}/2}dz.}

and,

d 1 = ln S K + ( r q + σ 2 / 2 ) T σ T . {\displaystyle d_{1}={\frac {\ln {\frac {S}{K}}+(r-q+\sigma ^{2}/2)T}{\sigma {\sqrt {T}}}}.}
d 2 = d 1 σ T . {\displaystyle d_{2}=d_{1}-\sigma {\sqrt {T}}.}

Cash-or-nothing call

This pays out one unit of cash if the spot is above the strike at maturity. Its value now is given by

C = e r T Φ ( d 2 ) . {\displaystyle C=e^{-rT}\Phi (d_{2}).\,}

Cash-or-nothing put

This pays out one unit of cash if the spot is below the strike at maturity. Its value now is given by

P = e r T Φ ( d 2 ) . {\displaystyle P=e^{-rT}\Phi (-d_{2}).\,}

Asset-or-nothing call

This pays out one unit of asset if the spot is above the strike at maturity. Its value now is given by

C = S e q T Φ ( d 1 ) . {\displaystyle C=Se^{-qT}\Phi (d_{1}).\,}

Asset-or-nothing put

This pays out one unit of asset if the spot is below the strike at maturity. Its value now is given by:

P = S e q T Φ ( d 1 ) . {\displaystyle P=Se^{-qT}\Phi (-d_{1}).\,}

American style

American binary put with K = 100, r = 0.04, σ = 0.2, T = 1

An American option gives the holder the right to exercise at any point up to and including the expiry time T {\displaystyle T} . That is, denoting by K {\displaystyle K} the strike price, if K S {\displaystyle K\geq S} (resp. K S {\displaystyle K\leq S} ), the corresponding American binary put (resp. call) is worth exactly one unit. Let

a = 1 σ ln ( K / S ) ξ = r q σ σ 2 , and  b = ξ 2 + 2 r . {\displaystyle a={\frac {1}{\sigma }}\ln(K/S){\text{, }}\xi ={\frac {r-q}{\sigma }}-{\frac {\sigma }{2}}{\text{, and }}b={\sqrt {\xi ^{2}+2r}}.\,}

The price of a cash-or-nothing American binary put (resp. call) with strike K < S {\displaystyle K<S} (resp. K > S {\displaystyle K>S} ) and time-to-expiry T {\displaystyle T} is:

1 2 e a ( ξ b ) { 1 + sgn ( a ) erf ( b T a 2 T ) + e 2 a b [ 1 sgn ( a ) erf ( b T + a 2 T ) ] } {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{2}}e^{a\left(\xi -b\right)}\left\{1+\operatorname {sgn} (a)\operatorname {erf} \left({\frac {bT-a}{\sqrt {2T}}}\right)+e^{2ab}\left\right\}\,}

where erf {\displaystyle \operatorname {erf} } denotes the error function and sgn {\displaystyle \operatorname {sgn} } denotes the sign function. The above follows immediately from expressions for the Laplace transform of the distribution of the conditional first passage time of Brownian motion to a particular level.

Foreign exchange

Further information: Foreign exchange derivative

If we denote by S the FOR/DOM exchange rate (i.e., 1 unit of foreign currency is worth S units of domestic currency) we can observe that paying out 1 unit of the domestic currency if the spot at maturity is above or below the strike is exactly like a cash-or nothing call and put respectively. Similarly, paying out 1 unit of the foreign currency if the spot at maturity is above or below the strike is exactly like an asset-or nothing call and put respectively. Hence if we now take r F O R {\displaystyle r_{\mathrm {FOR} }} , the foreign interest rate, r D O M {\displaystyle r_{DOM}} , the domestic interest rate, and the rest as above, we get the following results.

In case of a digital call (this is a call FOR/put DOM) paying out one unit of the domestic currency we get as present value,

C = e r D O M T Φ ( d 2 ) {\displaystyle C=e^{-r_{\mathrm {DOM} }T}\Phi (d_{2})\,}

In case of a digital put (this is a put FOR/call DOM) paying out one unit of the domestic currency we get as present value,

P = e r D O M T Φ ( d 2 ) {\displaystyle P=e^{-r_{\mathrm {DOM} }T}\Phi (-d_{2})\,}

While in case of a digital call (this is a call FOR/put DOM) paying out one unit of the foreign currency we get as present value,

C = S e r F O R T Φ ( d 1 ) {\displaystyle C=Se^{-r_{\mathrm {FOR} }T}\Phi (d_{1})\,}

and in case of a digital put (this is a put FOR/call DOM) paying out one unit of the foreign currency we get as present value,

P = S e r F O R T Φ ( d 1 ) {\displaystyle P=Se^{-r_{\mathrm {FOR} }T}\Phi (-d_{1})\,}

Skew

In the standard Black–Scholes model, one can interpret the premium of the binary option in the risk-neutral world as the expected value = probability of being in-the-money * unit, discounted to the present value. The Black–Scholes model relies on symmetry of distribution and ignores the skewness of the distribution of the asset. Market makers adjust for such skewness by, instead of using a single standard deviation for the underlying asset σ {\displaystyle \sigma } across all strikes, incorporating a variable one σ ( K ) {\displaystyle \sigma (K)} where volatility depends on strike price, thus incorporating the volatility skew into account. The skew matters because it affects the binary considerably more than the regular options.

A binary call option is, at long expirations, similar to a tight call spread using two vanilla options. One can model the value of a binary cash-or-nothing option, C, at strike K, as an infinitesimally tight spread, where C v {\displaystyle C_{v}} is a vanilla European call:

C = lim ϵ 0 C v ( K ϵ ) C v ( K ) ϵ {\displaystyle C=\lim _{\epsilon \to 0}{\frac {C_{v}(K-\epsilon )-C_{v}(K)}{\epsilon }}}

Thus, the value of a binary call is the negative of the derivative of the price of a vanilla call with respect to strike price:

C = d C v d K {\displaystyle C=-{\frac {dC_{v}}{dK}}}

When one takes volatility skew into account, σ {\displaystyle \sigma } is a function of K {\displaystyle K} :

C = d C v ( K , σ ( K ) ) d K = C v K C v σ σ K {\displaystyle C=-{\frac {dC_{v}(K,\sigma (K))}{dK}}=-{\frac {\partial C_{v}}{\partial K}}-{\frac {\partial C_{v}}{\partial \sigma }}{\frac {\partial \sigma }{\partial K}}}

The first term is equal to the premium of the binary option ignoring skew:

C v K = ( S Φ ( d 1 ) K e r T Φ ( d 2 ) ) K = e r T Φ ( d 2 ) = C n o s k e w {\displaystyle -{\frac {\partial C_{v}}{\partial K}}=-{\frac {\partial (S\Phi (d_{1})-Ke^{-rT}\Phi (d_{2}))}{\partial K}}=e^{-rT}\Phi (d_{2})=C_{\mathrm {noskew} }}

C v σ {\displaystyle {\frac {\partial C_{v}}{\partial \sigma }}} is the Vega of the vanilla call; σ K {\displaystyle {\frac {\partial \sigma }{\partial K}}} is sometimes called the "skew slope" or just "skew". Skew is typically negative, so the value of a binary call is higher when taking skew into account.

C = C n o s k e w V e g a v S k e w {\displaystyle C=C_{\mathrm {noskew} }-\mathrm {Vega} _{v}*\mathrm {Skew} }

Relationship to vanilla options' Greeks

Since a binary call is a mathematical derivative of a vanilla call with respect to strike, the price of a binary call has the same shape as the delta of a vanilla call, and the delta of a binary call has the same shape as the gamma of a vanilla call.

Regulation and fraud

Further information: Securities fraud

Many binary option "brokers" have been exposed as fraudulent operations. In those cases, there is no real brokerage; the customer is betting against the broker, who is acting as a bucket shop. Manipulation of price data to cause customers to lose is common. Withdrawals are regularly stalled or refused by such operations; if a client has good reason to expect a payment, the operator will simply stop taking their phone calls. Though binary options sometimes trade on regulated exchange, they are generally unregulated, trading on the Internet, and prone to fraud. Most of the binary options brokers are registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and offering their services globally. The country's Financial Services Authority has issued a warning to the general public about unlicensed Forex and binary options trading provided by entities registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

European Union

On 23 March 2018, The European Securities and Markets Authority, a European Union financial regulatory institution and European Supervisory Authority located in Paris, agreed to new temporary rules prohibiting the marketing, distribution or sale of binary options to retail clients.

Australia

The Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) warned Australian investors on 13 February 2015 against Opteck, an unlicensed binary option provider. The ASIC later began a focused effort to control unlicensed derivative providers, including "review" websites, broker affiliates, and managed service providers related to binary option products. ASIC finally released a ban on sale of binary options to retail clients in 2021.

Belgium

In August 2016, Belgium's Financial Services and Markets Authority banned binary options schemes, based on concerns about widespread fraud.

Canada

No firms are registered in Canada to offer or sell binary options, so no binary options trading is currently allowed. Provincial regulators have proposed a complete ban on all binary options trading include a ban on online advertising for binary options trading sites. A complete ban on binary options trading for options having an expiration less than 30 days was announced on September 28, 2017.

Cyprus

On May 3, 2012, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) announced a policy change regarding the classification of binary options as financial instruments. The effect is that binary options platforms operating in Cyprus, where many of the platforms are now based, would have to be CySEC regulated within six months of the date of the announcement. CySEC was the first EU MiFID-member regulator to treat binary options as financial instruments.

In 2013, CySEC prevailed over the disreputable binary options brokers and communicated intensively with traders in order to prevent the risks of using unregulated financial services. On September 19, 2013, CySEC sent out a press release warning investors against binary options broker TraderXP, who was not and had never been licensed by CySEC. On October 18, 2013, CySEC released an investor warning about binary options broker NRGbinary and its parent company NRG Capital (CY) Ltd., stating that NRGbinary was not and had never been licensed by CySEC.

CySEC also temporarily suspended the license of the Cedar Finance on December 19, 2013, because the potential violations referenced appeared to seriously endanger the interests of the company's customers and the proper functioning of capital markets, as described in the official issued press release. CySEC also issued a warning against binary option broker PlanetOption at the end of the year and another warning against binary option broker LBinary on January 10, 2014, pointing out that it was not regulated by the Commission and the Commission had not received any notification by any of its counterparts in other European countries to the effect of this firm being a regulated provider.

The Cyprus regulator imposed a penalty of €15,000 against ZoomTrader. OptionBravo and ChargeXP were also financially penalized. CySEC also indicated that it had voted to reject the ShortOption license application.

In 2015, CySEC repeatedly fined Banc De Binary for several violations including the solicitation of U.S. clients. In 2016, the regulator fined Banc De Binary Ltd once again for violation of its legislation. The broker has come to a settlement of €350,000.

France

In August 2016, France's Sapin II bill on transparency was announced by the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), seeking to outlaw all financial derivatives advertising. The AMF stated that it would ban the advertising of certain highly speculative and risky financial contracts to private individuals by electronic means. The document applies specifically to binary options, and to contracts for difference (CFDs), and financial contracts on currencies. The French regulator is determined to cooperate with the legal authorities to have illegal websites blocked. The law also prohibits all forms of sponsorship and partnership that results in direct or indirect advertising of the financial products it covers. This ban was seen by industry watchers as having an impact on sponsored sports such as European football clubs.

The Cyprus-based company 24Option was banned from trading in France by AMF earlier in 2016. They had sponsored a well-known Irish mixed martial artist, Conor McGregor, who in turn promoted the company through social media.

Germany

German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) has been regularly publishing investor warnings. On November 29, 2018, BaFin announced that it is planning to "prohibit the marketing, distribution and sale of binary options to retail clients at a national level".

Indonesia

According to the Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (CoFTRA) in Indonesia, also known as BAPPEBTI, binary options are considered a form of online gambling and is illegal in the country. The move to delegalize binary options stems from concerns that the public may be swayed by misleading advertisements, promotions, and offers to participate in fraudulent practices that operate under the guise of binary options trading. As of 2 February 2022, at least 92 binary options websites, including Binomo, IQ Option, and Olymp Trade, have been classified as unlicensed operators and blocked by the Indonesian government.

Israel

Binary options trading

In March 2016 binary options trading within Israel was banned by the Israel Securities Authority, on the grounds that such trading is essentially gambling and not a form of investment management. The ban was extended to overseas clients as well in October 2017. It was approved by the Knesset in October, despite strong opposition from the binary options industry.

Fraud

In 2016 The Times of Israel ran several articles on binary options fraud. "The wolves of Tel Aviv: Israel's vast, amoral binary options scam exposed" revealed that the industry is a scam. A second article describes in detail how a binary options salesman fleeced clients. "According to one ex-employee of a firm that employs over 1,000 people in a high-rise office building in Tel Aviv, losses are guaranteed because the 'dealing room' at the binary options firm controls the trading platform — like the crooked ownership of a rigged casino manipulating the roulette wheel".

In July 2016 the Israeli binary option firms Vault Options and Global Trader 365 were ordered by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois to pay more than $4.5 million for unlawful off-exchange binary options trading, fraud, and registration violations. The companies were also banned permanently from operating in the United States or selling to U.S. residents.

In November 2016 the Israel Securities Authority carried out a raid on the Ramat Gan offices of binary option broker iTrader. The CEO and six other employees were charged with fraud, providing unlicensed investment advice, and obstruction of justice.

On May 15, 2017, Eliran Saada, the owner of Express Target Marketing, which has operated the binary options companies InsideOption and SecuredOptions, was arrested on suspicion of fraud, false accounting, forgery, extortion, and blackmail. The case involves a Singaporean woman who claims to have lost over $500,000 to the firm.

In August 2017 Israeli police superintendent Rafi Biton said that the binary trading industry had "turned into a monster". He told the Israeli Knesset that criminal investigations had begun.

In September 2017, the FBI arrested Lee Elbaz, CEO of binary options trading company Yukom Communications, upon her arrival in the United States. They arrested her for wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud. In 2019, Lee Elbaz was found guilty and sentenced to 22 years in prison.

In February 2019, the FBI arrested Austin Smith, founder of Wealth Recovery International, after his arrival in the United States. Smith was arrested for wire fraud due to his involvement as an employee of Binarybook.com.

Malta

In March 2013 the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) announced that binary options regulation would be transferred away from Malta's Lottery and Gaming Authority. On 18 June 2013 MFSA confirmed that in their view binary options fell under the scope of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID), which made Malta the second EU jurisdiction to regulate binary options as a financial instrument. This required providers to obtain a category 3 Investment Services license and conform to MiFID's minimum capital requirements; firms could previously operate from the jurisdiction with a valid Lottery and Gaming Authority license.

New Zealand

In April 2017, New Zealand's Financial Markets Authority (FMA) announced that all brokers that offer short-term investment instruments that settle within three days are required to obtain a license from the agency. This is intended to cover binary options as well as contracts for difference (CFDs).

United Kingdom

Binary options trading

In the UK, binary options were regulated by the Gambling Commission rather than the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). This regulation, however, applied only to firms that have gambling equipment in the UK. The FCA in 2016 did propose bringing binary options under its jurisdiction and restricting them. They stated that binary options "did not appear to meet a genuine investment need". In March 2017, Action Fraud issued a warning on binary options.

The Isle of Man, a self-governing Crown dependency for which the UK is responsible, has issued licenses to companies offering binary options as "games of skill" licensed and regulated under fixed odds betting by the Isle of Man Gambling Supervision Commission (GSC). This positions binary options as a form of gambling, and the administrator of the trading as something akin to a casino, as opposed to an exchange or brokerage house.

On October 19, 2017, London police raided 20 binary options firms in London. On January 3, 2018, the FCA took over regulation of binary options from the Gambling Commission. In December 2018, FCA has proposed new rules which would permanently ban the sale, marketing and distribution of binary options to retail consumers.

Fraud

Fraud within the market is rife, with many binary options providers using the names of famous and respectable people without their knowledge. According to a national fraud and cybercrime reporting centre Action Fraud, 664 binary options frauds were reported in 2015/16, increasing to 1,474 in 2016/17. The City of London police in May 2017 said that reported losses for the previous financial year were £13 million, increased from £2 million the year before. In the first half of 2017, 697 people reported losses totaling over £18 million.

United States

Binary options trading

In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved exchange-traded binary options in 2008. Trading commenced on the NYSE American (MYSEA) and the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) in May and June 2008.

The MYSEA offers binary options on some exchange-traded funds and a few highly liquid equities such as Citigroup and Google. On the exchange binary options were called "fixed return options" (FROs). To reduce the threat of market manipulation of single stocks, FROs use a "settlement index" defined as a volume-weighted average of trades on the expiration day. MYSEA and Donato A. Montanaro submitted a patent application for exchange-listed binary options using a volume-weighted settlement index in 2005. CBOE offers binary options on the S&P 500 (SPX) and the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX). The tickers for these are BSZ and BVZ, respectively.

NADEX, a U.S.-based Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) regulated exchange, launched binary options for a range of Forex, commodities, and stock indices' markets in June 2009,. On March 30, 2010 the CFTC issued an amended Order of Designation to allow trades on NADEX to be intermediated. NADEX have since offered binary options trading between buyers and sellers. They do not participate in the trades.

Fraud

On June 6, 2013, the U.S. CFTC and the SEC jointly issued an Investor Alert to warn about fraudulent promotional schemes involving binary options and binary options trading platforms. The two agencies said that they had received numerous complaints of fraud about binary options trading sites, "including refusal to credit customer accounts or reimburse funds to customers; identity theft; and manipulation of software to generate losing trades". Other binary options operations were violating requirements to register with regulators.

In June 2013, U.S. regulators charged Israeli-Cypriot company Banc De Binary with illegally selling binary options to U.S. investors. In February 2016, the company reached an $11 million settlement with U.S. authorities. Regulators found the company used a "virtual office" in New York's Trump Tower in pursuit of its scheme, evading a ban on off-exchange binary option contracts. The company neither admitted nor denied the allegations. In November 2016, SEC published yet another Investor Alert on binary options websites. In 2016,

In February 2017 The Times of Israel reported that the FBI was conducting an active international investigation of binary option fraud, emphasizing its international nature, saying that the agency was "not limited to the USA". Victims from around the world were asked to contact an FBI field office or the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center. The investigation is not limited to the binary options brokers, but is comprehensive and could include companies that provide services that allow the industry to operate. Credit card issuers will be informed of the fraudulent nature of much of the industry, which could possibly allow victims to receive a chargeback, or refund, of fraudulently obtained money.

On March 13, 2017, the FBI reiterated its warning, declaring that the "perpetrators behind many of the binary options websites, primarily criminals located overseas, are only interested in one thing—taking your money". They also provide a checklist on how to avoid being victimized.

There is also a popular binary options recovery services scam, where fraudsters promise to "hunt" down the binary options scammers and retrieve the money from them through legal methods. In January 2018, Boston federal prosecutors filed a complaint against Leonel Alexis Valerio Santana and Frank Gregory Cedeno, accusing them of such type of fraud. In August 2018, Santana was sentenced to 63 months in prison, three years of supervised release, and ordered to pay restitution of $105,869 (Cedeno was indicted in March and pleaded not guilty).

See also

References

  1. ^ Breeden, D. T., & Litzenberger, R. H. (1978). "Prices of state-contingent claims implicit in option prices". Journal of Business, 621–651.
  2. ^ Gatheral, J. (2006). The volatility surface: a practitioner's guide (Vol. 357). John Wiley & Sons.
  3. ^ Binary Option Definition Investopedia. Retrieved 2013-06-30.
  4. ^ Tsipori, Tali (15 December 2016). "Binary options worth $1.25b to Israel's GDP in 2016". Globes. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
  5. "Binary Options Fraud". Federal Bureau of Investigation. Retrieved 2017-05-30.
  6. ^ Weinglass, Simona (February 15, 2017). "FBI says it's investigating binary options fraud worldwide, invites victims to come forward". The Times of Israel. Retrieved February 15, 2017.
  7. ^ Weinglass, Simona (March 15, 2017). "FBI places public warning against 'Binary Options Fraud' at top of its main news". The Times of Israel. Retrieved March 15, 2017.
  8. ^ Appelberg, Shelly (2017-08-03). "In First, Israel Police Admit Crime Syndicates Are Behind Binary Options Industry". Haaretz. Retrieved 2017-10-24.
  9. ^ "ESMA agrees to prohibit binary options and restrict CFDs to protect retail investors". www.esma.europa.eu. Retrieved 2019-03-21.
  10. "Binary Options Trading In Australia: How Safe Is It?". International Business Times AU. 2018-05-14. Retrieved 2018-05-22.
  11. ^ "21-064MR ASIC bans the sale of binary options to retail clients". Australian Securities & Investments Commission. Retrieved 8 March 2022.
  12. Weinglass, Simona (March 4, 2017). "As Israel-based financial fraud soars, police swoop on 20 suspects as part of global, FBI-led sting". The Times of Israel. Retrieved March 4, 2017.
  13. ^ Press Association (18 May 2017). "Richard Branson says scammers are using his name to dupe investors". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 May 2017.
  14. ^ Weinglass, Simona (March 23, 2016). "The wolves of Tel Aviv: Israel's vast, amoral binary options scam exposed". The Times of Israel. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  15. ^ Weinglass, Simona & Horovitz, David (April 7, 2016). "Ex-binary options salesman: Here's how we fleece the clients". The Times of Israel.
  16. Tova Cohen (June 18, 2017), "Israel cabinet approves ban on sale of binary options", Reuters, retrieved 2017-07-15
  17. ^ Weinglass, Simona (October 23, 2017). "Israel bans binary options industry, finally closing vast, 10-year fraud". The Times of Israel. Retrieved October 24, 2017.
  18. ^ Tomer, Uri (2017-10-24). "Israel Bans Binary Options Industry That Defrauded Millions". Haaretz. Retrieved 2017-10-24.
  19. Frier, Sarah; Verhage, Jules (January 30, 2018). "Facebook Bans Ads Associated With Cryptocurrencies". Bloomberg. Retrieved February 7, 2018.
  20. Cornish, Chloe (January 30, 2018). "Facebook and regulators move to halt cryptocurrency scams". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 2022-12-10. Retrieved February 7, 2018.
  21. Weinglass, Simona (March 28, 2018). "European Union bans binary options, strictly regulates CFDs". The Times of Israel. Retrieved March 21, 2019.
  22. ^ Mitchell, Cory (11 June 2014). "A Guide To Trading Binary Options In The U.S." Investopedia. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
  23. "Broker's Edge Calculator". BinaryTrading. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
  24. "FMA Focus Binary Options and CFDs" (PDF). Financial Market Authority (Austria). Retrieved 4 May 2018.
  25. ^ Pape, Gordon (27 July 2010). "Don't Gamble On Binary Options". Forbes.com. Archived from the original on 2013-06-21. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
  26. ^ "CFTC Fraud Advisories". www.cftc.gov. U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
  27. Hull, John C. (2005). Options, Futures and Other Derivatives. Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-149908-4.
  28. Closed-form expressions for perpetual and finite-maturity American binary options. parsiad.ca (2015-03-01). Retrieved on 2016-07-18.
  29. ^ "Investor Alert Binary Options and Fraud" (PDF). U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  30. "UNLICENSED FOREX/BINARY OPTIONS – Financial Services Authority". svgfsa.com. 2022-02-03. Retrieved 2022-05-12.
  31. "15-024MR ASIC warns of Opteck and other unlicensed binary option providers". Retrieved 5 September 2016.
  32. "16-218MR ASIC crackdown on unlicensed retail OTC derivative providers". Retrieved 5 September 2016.
  33. Weinglass, Simona (August 13, 2016). "In European first, Belgium bans binary options". The Times of Israel.
  34. Shecter, Barbara (April 26, 2017). "Canadian watchdogs move to ban binary options as fraudulent schemes fleece investors, steal identities". Financial Post. Retrieved April 26, 2017.
  35. "Securities regulatory group announces ban on short-term binary options". CBC News. September 28, 2017. Retrieved September 28, 2017.
  36. "regarding the supervision of Binary Options" (PDF). CySEC. 3 May 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-07-10. Retrieved 4 June 2012.
  37. "Warning" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-04-07. Retrieved 27 March 2014.
  38. "Warning" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-03-31. Retrieved 27 March 2014.
  39. "The projects of the CySEC regulator in terms of binary options in 2014". Archived from the original on 15 October 2017. Retrieved 27 March 2014.
  40. "Banc De Binary Fined €125,000 by Cyprus Watchdog for Soliciting American Clients", Finance Magnates.
  41. "Banc De Binary Settles With CySEC to Pay €350,000", Finance Magnates
  42. "Ban on the advertising of forex products, binary options and some CFDs: AMF launches consultation on changes to its General Regulation", Autorité des Marchés Financiers (press release), August 1, 2016, archived from the original on June 17, 2019, retrieved January 15, 2017
  43. Andrew Saks-McLeod (9 January 2017). "IG Group officially responds to French FX and CFD advertising ban". Finance Feeds. Archived from the original on 3 September 2017. Retrieved 18 May 2017.
  44. Maria Nikolova (10 January 2017). "AMF toughens its stance on advertising following public consultation". Finance Feeds. Archived from the original on 7 May 2017. Retrieved 18 May 2017.
  45. Maria Nikolova, "French football clubs rush to terminate binary options partnerships", Finance Feeds, archived from the original on 2019-06-17, retrieved 2017-01-15, Under Article 77 of the Sapin II law, football teams have until the end of June this year to terminate all sponsorships
  46. "24OPTION - Cyprus Business Name - CyprusRegistry.com". cyprusregistry.com. Retrieved 2019-04-17.
  47. L'Autorité des marchés financiers interdit à Rodeler Limited (" 24option ") de fournir des services sur le territoire français [Autorité des Marchés Financiers halts Rodeler Limited ("24option") activities in France] (press release), Autorité des Marchés Financiers, July 29, 2016, archived from the original on June 17, 2019, retrieved January 15, 2017
  48. Barry O'Halloran (November 19, 2016), "Conor McGregor sponsor barred from operating in France", Irish Times
  49. "BaFin plans national prohibition of binary options for retail clients". Federal Financial Supervisory Authority. November 29, 2018. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  50. Dirgantara, Hikma (2022-02-03). "Bappebti Blokir 92 Entitas Binary Option di 2021, Termasuk Binomo, IQ Option". Kontan.co.id (in Indonesian). Retrieved 2022-02-07.
  51. "Indonesian regulators block illegal trading websites following complaints on social media". KrASIA. 2022-02-04. Retrieved 2022-02-07.
  52. Weinglass, Simona (June 18, 2017). "Israeli ministers approve bill to outlaw entire binary options industry". The Times of Israel. Retrieved June 19, 2017.
  53. "Federal Court Orders Israeli Web-based Firms, Vault Options, Ltd. and Global Trader 365, to Pay More than $4.5 Million for Unlawful Off-Exchange Binary Options Trading, Fraud, and Registration Violations". Commodities and Futures Trading Commission. July 28, 2016.
  54. Weinglass, Simona; Horovitz, David (November 12, 2016). "Israeli authorities raid binary options firm, arrest CEO, salespeople". The Times of Israel.
  55. Weinglass, Simona (May 16, 2017). "Tel Aviv binary options boss nabbed for fraud, extortion; company raided, computers confiscated". The Times of Israel. Retrieved May 16, 2017.
  56. Cohen, Tova (May 16, 2017). "Israeli police arrest owner of binary options firm accused of fraud". Reuters. Retrieved May 16, 2017.
  57. Staff, Tori (September 24, 2017). "FBI arrests Israeli binary options CEO as she disembarks El Al flight at JFK". The Times of Israel. Retrieved September 24, 2017.
  58. "Former CEO of Israeli Company Sentenced to 22 Years in Prison for Orchestrating Major International Binary Options Fraud Scheme". Department of Justice. December 19, 2019. Retrieved August 19, 2022.
  59. Weinglass, Simona. "Israeli-American claiming to help binary options victims pleads guilty to fraud". www.timesofisrael.com.
  60. "Gaming or Trading? That is the Question – MFSA To Regulate Binary Options as a Financial Product", Finance Magnates
  61. "Malta The Next Cyprus? MFSA Announces Regulatory Framework For Binary Options". Finance Magnates. July 18, 2013.
  62. "FMA confirms short-term derivatives to be licensed | FMA". fma.govt.nz. Retrieved 2017-04-18.
  63. ^ Murphy, Hannah (January 12, 2018). "FCA warns on illegal binary options providers". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 2022-12-10. Retrieved December 8, 2018.(subscription required)
  64. Fantato, Damian (November 15, 2017). "FCA warns investors against binary options". FTAdviser. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  65. ^ Murphy, Hannah (October 19, 2017). "Police launch raids on 20 City of London businesses". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 2022-12-10. Retrieved October 21, 2017.(subscription required)
  66. "What is Binary Options Fraud and what are the law enforcement doing about it?". Action Fraud. March 31, 2017. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  67. "Licence holders". gov.im. Isle of Man Government. Retrieved 2017-09-02.
  68. Fantato, Damian (December 7, 2018). "FCA to permanently restrict binary options sales". FTAdviser. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  69. Frankel, Doris (June 9, 2008). "CBOE to list binary options on S&P 500, VIX". Reuters. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  70. "The History of Binary Options Trading – Infographic". leaprate.com. January 5, 2017. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  71. "System and methods for trading binary options on an exchange" Archived 2009-02-18 at the Wayback Machine, World Intellectual Property Organization filing. Retrieved on 2013-01-12.
  72. "CBOE Introduces Binary Options on SPX SM and VIX" (PDF). Chicago Board Options Exchange. September 10, 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 10, 2008. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  73. "^BSZ (CBOE Binary Options On The S&P 500 Index)". Chicago Board Options Exchange. December 8, 2018. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  74. "^BVZ (CBOE Binary Options Volatility)". Chicago Board Options Exchange. December 8, 2018. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  75. "Nadex, North American derivatives exchange rolls out new trading platform, products" (PDF). Nadex. June 22, 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 1, 2012. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  76. "- CFTC". sirt.cftc.gov. Retrieved 2019-03-21.
  77. "Regulated & Legal for US Residents". Nadex. 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2019-03-21.
  78. "SEC Warns Investors About Binary Options and Charges Cyprus-Based Company with Selling Them Illegally in U.S." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  79. Patrick, Margot (February 25, 2016). "Banc de Binary Reaches $11 Million Settlement with U.S. Authorities". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved December 8, 2018.(subscription required)
  80. "Investor Alert: Binary Options Websites May Be Used for Fraudulent Schemes". U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. November 10, 2016. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  81. "Binary Options Fraud, A Word of Warning to the Investing Public". FBI.gov. Federal Bureau of Investigation. March 13, 2017. Retrieved March 14, 2017.
  82. Kimberley, David (July 27, 2018). "Scamming the Scammed – 'Recovery Experts' Target Binary Options Victims". Finance Magnates. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  83. Kay, Martin (December 5, 2018). "Binary Options Recovery Services – The Real Story". thatsucks.com. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  84. "U.S. charges two over fraud featuring bogus SEC employees". Reuters. January 24, 2018. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  85. Fisher, Jenna (August 16, 2018). "Man Gets 5+ Years Prison For Boston, Dominican SEC Email Scam". Patch.com. Retrieved December 8, 2018.

Further reading

External links

Derivatives market
Derivative (finance)
Options
Terms
Vanillas
Exotics
Strategies
Valuation
Swaps
Exotic derivatives
Other derivatives
Market issues
Categories: