Misplaced Pages

User talk:Renejs: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:53, 18 July 2012 editRenejs (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users544 edits Your edits at Nazareth← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:15, 19 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,139,220 edits ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery 
(58 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This is my rather skimpy talk page. Please add something brilliant or at least reasonable if you'd like. . . ] (]) 06:01, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
'''Welcome!'''


== ] ==
Hello, {{PAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{&#123;helpme}}</code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!&nbsp;


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Please have a detailed look at the core policy ]. What it means is that Misplaced Pages is not a place to publish work you have done yourself. I have reverted your contribution to Nazareth because of this. It may be appropriate to add it back again later. ] 20:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 -->


== ]: Voting now open! ==
Please also read ] and ]. Thank you. ] 20:53, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Renejs. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
== Discussion on ] ==


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I posted a response to your comments on my talk page. Please feel free to continue the discussion there, or at the ] talk page. ] 10:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
==Do not be rude==
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/17&oldid=750571901 -->


== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==
Implying that I am childish is no way to carry on a discussion. While you may believe that Nazareth did not exist at the time of Jesus, you cannot patrol an article to exclude the newest archaeological developments so as to make it sound like there is continuing support for this thesis. The world has moved on. More and more archeological finds in Nazareth will establish many interesting things about its history. While you do not have to change your beliefs, you certainly have to let that information be represented in the article per ]. Using {{user|Jayjg}} to get my edits reverted was very uncouth of you, particularly since you must be aware of our less than functional relationship. I am very disappointed. ] 18:14, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Renejs. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
== Kopp on Nazareth ==


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I think we may have a legitimate historiographical question here. I've posted on the talk page asking people to say what they think. ]&nbsp;<small>(])</small> 19:16, 9 June 2007 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
==Please stop harassing me==
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/09&oldid=866998319 -->


== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==
by repeatedly discussing your issues with the ] article on my talk page instead of the article talk page. It is there to discuss edits related to the article. Please use it. ] 18:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
:One more thing, on my talk page, you accused me of deleting sourced information. I reviewed the history of my edits and could find no such thing. Could you please provide me with a diff outlining my "deletions"? Failing that, I expect that you will acknowledge that your accusation was unfounded and ideally try apologizing. ] 10:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== "Arguments from silence" ==


If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
The section of the "Nazareth" article, "Earliest history & archaeological evidence," seeks to present useful information, not conclusions which are unsubstantiated and debatable (see below). The statement that an "argument from silence is rarely proof of anything" (which I deleted 2 December 2007) is quite untrue, particularly in reference to archaeological data where digging in the ground plainly shows what is absent as well as what is present. As to the literary silence regarding Nazareth in ancient sources, this must be allowed to speak for itself, for it is a fact. A great many scholars find that silence quite significant, as a history of the Nazareth literature shows. To conclude on one side or the other in this matter is inappropriate. Finally, the possiblility that Nazareth was "merely a small, obscure and insignificant town" at the turn of the era is now under debate. That claim suffers from the following problems: (1) the fact that Luke chp. 4 portrays Nazareth as a "polis" ("city," v. 29), and one having a synagogue, means that the settlement had considerable population in the evangelist's mind; and (2) it is unlikely that even an insignificant village would have evaded all mention by Josephus who, for a time, lived only 3 kilometers away in Japhia.--Renejs


</div>
==Big job==
</div>
Hey there. Well, I'm not sure I'm up to that kind of job re: the Nazareth article. I think it's going to be hard for us to come to an agreement on how much emphasis the views you explain in your book should be given in the article. I know what it's like to be deeply passionate about one's scholarship and it's hard to take the kind of distance necessary to give space to all significant viewpoints (or even determine which viewpoints are significant). Anyway, I'm glad that you finally published your book. I hope I'll be able to get my hands on a copy, since I'm fascinated by archaeology and history, especially as it relates to my home town (and that's my problem, in that I don't really have the distance required to approach the subject purely from an anaytical angle). But I do appreciate the offer, the cooperative and conciliatory tone and I wish you the best of luck with your pursuits. If you want to edit out some Chad Emmett stuff (when he's quoted for archaeological information), I don;t really mind. I'm sure we can find other more scholarly sources that say basically what he does. So please, if you're going to go that route. Remove the citation and add <nowiki>{{fact|date=December 2008}}</nowiki> after the sentence in question. I'll come along and place in a substitute ref, if I can find one. If not, I'll rephrase per the sources we can find. Thanks again for your offer, but piecemeal changes on the article and talk page are all I can muster for that subject right now. Warm regards, ]<sup>]</sup> 16:28, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1187132049 -->


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
== Please do not move by copying and pasting ==


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
] was created as a redirect to ]. You changed it from being a redirect by copying and pasting the content from ]. See the . If you want the disambiguation page to be located at ] , then either use the Move function, or if the move requires admin assistance, then propose the most as described at ]. ] ≠ ] 22:04, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
:NO! "Moving" pages like you say got us into this problem in the first place!!! When you move a page, "The old title will become a redirect page to the new title." This is exactly what we DON'T want! Nobody want "Nazarene" to redirect to "Nazarene (disambiguation)."


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
:You've already muddied the waters enough with confusing (and malicious) redirects involving all these pages. I will not continue the charade. If you have a problem with the disambiguation page being where it belongs, and with the content page where it belongs, then contact Wiki administration.] (]) 23:59, 26 October 2009 (UTC)


</div>
::It matters not what ill-advised decisions got you to where you are now, but moving by copying and pasting is an unacceple response. Period.
</div>

<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 -->

:So, it's permitted to get us into the stew with redirects, but not permitted to get us out by "copying and pasting"? Hmmm. . .

:I've submitted the matter for mediation: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2009-10-27/Nazarene.] (]) 20:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

== October 2009 ==
] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you ] while interacting with other editors, which you did not on ]. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-agf1 --> ''That is a disambiguation page. I'd also be careful to whom you do that to as well... '' <font color="darkblue">'''A8UDI'''</font> ] 17:10, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

== January 2010 ==
] Please stop. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's ] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to ], you will be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> ''And if you are the Rene I am thinking of, ] may be of interest.'' ] (]) 05:40, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

:There is a talk page, please take advantage of it and discuss as opposed to vandalising the page. --] (]) 05:46, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 05:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to ]. If you ] Misplaced Pages again, you '''will''' be ]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> ] (]) 04:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:|The thread is ]. }}{{#if:|The discussion is about the topic {{#ifexist:]|]|{{{1}}}}}.}} <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 21:22, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

== Your editing ==

is under discussion at ]]] 21:23, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

== WP:FRINGE POV Edit Warring ==

] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If the edit warring continues, '''you may be ] from editing''' without further notice. <!-- Template:uw-3rr -->

I have reported your continued edit warring to ]. ] (]) 22:48, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

== 3RR complaint about your edits ==

Your edits are being discussed at ]. You are welcome to respond there. Since others have challenged your work, you should expect to wait for consensus on Talk before making controversial changes. You have made seven edits since April 8 which contain words like 'restoration' in the edit summary, which suggests you are reverting the work of others. This should not continue unless others support you. ] (]) 19:38, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
==Eisenman==
Hi. I read ''James:The brother of Jesus'' when it first came out but don't remember much of it now. I recall Eisenman saying he thought Jesus of Nazareth was just a mistranslation of Jesus the Nazarene or Nazarite. Can you tell me if Eisenman would reasonably be called a ''mythicist''? ] (]) 11:36, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

::Yes, I think Eisenman would now say he's a "mythicist." But you would have to ask him yourself to be certain.] (]) 02:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

== A kitten for you! ==

]
This kitten is for your fine work helping to clean up the ] article. Thanks!

] (]) 23:28, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
<br style="clear: both"/>

== Your edits at ] ==

Two matters:
* First I advise you to read the panel "WARNING:ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES" which appears at the top of ] and familiarize yourself with its content and the content of the pages it links to.
* Second I want to ask you if you have verified that "B. Bagatti, Excavations in Nazareth, Plate XI, top right." is a source providing the information "However, the hill in question (the Nebi Sa'in) is far too steep for ancient dwellings and averages a 14% grade in the venerated area.".
]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 00:19, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Bagatti provides a chart with the slope of the hill. Measuring that slope provides the information that it averages a 14% grade. That is very steep.] (]) 03:53, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:15, 19 November 2024

This is my rather skimpy talk page. Please add something brilliant or at least reasonable if you'd like. . . Renejs (talk) 06:01, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Renejs. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Renejs. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)