Revision as of 08:08, 19 July 2012 view sourceJBW (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators196,007 editsm Bigger penguin← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 09:02, 6 October 2024 view source JBW (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators196,007 editsm Update edit statistic |
(71 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{NOINDEX}} |
|
{{NOINDEX}} |
|
|
* At 14:14 GMT on the 13th of April 2022, I had made 0.01538% of all the edits to the English language Misplaced Pages. |
|
|
* At 12:34 GMT on the 24th of December 2022, this had risen to 0.01542%. |
|
|
* At 32:34 GMT on the 6th of February 2023, it had reached 0.01546%. |
|
|
* At 8:55 GMT on the 6th of October 2024 I had made a total of 201,743 edits (including deleted edits), 0.01621% of the total, or 1 in 6,171 of all edits. |
|
|
|
|
<div style="right:{{#if:{{{1|}}}|{{{1}}}|10}}px; top:5px; z-index:101;" class="metadata topicon" id="featured-star"> |
|
<div style="right:{{#if:{{{1|}}}|{{{1}}}|10}}px; top:5px; z-index:101;" class="metadata topicon" id="featured-star"> |
|
<imagemap> |
|
<imagemap> |
|
Image:Crystal 128 penguin.png|60px |
|
Image:Crystal 128 penguin.png|60px |
|
rect 0 0 128 128 ] |
|
rect 0 0 128 128 ] |
|
desc none |
|
desc none |
|
</imagemap> |
|
</imagemap> |
|
</div> |
|
</div> |
|
|
|
|
|
:'''Pronouns:''' he, she, it, they, them, which, that, one, him, her, we, you, us, what, whatever, whichever, ... some choices may surprise me, but I won't be offended by whatever you choose. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{User wikipedia/Administrator}} |
|
{{User wikipedia/Administrator}} |
|
{{Senior Editor III Userbox}} |
|
|
{{User en}} |
|
{{User en}} |
|
{{User fr-2}} |
|
{{Renamer}} |
|
{{User it-1}} |
|
|
{{User DNFT}} |
|
|
{{User wikipedia/CVU-Vandal Fighter}} |
|
|
{{User:Kirachinmoku/Huggle}} |
|
|
{{Template:user mathematician}} |
|
{{Template:user mathematician}} |
|
{{user toomanyedits}} |
|
{{user toomanyedits}} |
|
|
{{User Wikipedian TLA club}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{UserboxCOI|1=Rainer K. Sachs}} |
|
{{clear}} |
|
|
|
{{clear}} |
|
== Barnstars== |
|
|
{{collapse top|Some people have been kind enough to express their appreciation of my efforts by giving me barnstars and other tokens. If you are interested you can see some of them here. This is not a complete list, as I can't be bothered updating it.}} |
|
|
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] |
|
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For that great summary of my acts of Sockpuppetry and for forgiving me after. Thanks ] (]) 17:17, 9 July 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] |
|
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks for digging up the editors and contacting them in the clarifications requested at ] – this level of diligence is above and beyond! —Nils von Barth (]) (]) 20:08, 10 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] |
|
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Guidance Barnstar''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I saw and was very impressed. Keep up the good work. ] <sub>]</sub> 12:07, 17 February 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] |
|
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For you vandalism removing work --] (] + ]) 07:37, 21 April 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] |
|
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Userpage Shield''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks for helping me with the vandalizme on my user page ] (]) 20:17, 27 April 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
:Another editor has reviewed this user's barnstar, and endorses both James's good humor and the reason given above. ] ] <sup>(])</sup> 15:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] |
|
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Recovery''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For ] and helping out two wikipedians--one a newbie, and the other, presumably a mistaken new page patroller, I award you this barnstar. --] @ 18:57, 14 May 2010 (UTC)] |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] |
|
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Special Barnstar''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For the reverting of unhelpfull edits by ] I award you the Special Barnstar. ] (]) 22:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I, Krashlandon, award you, JamesBWatson, this barnstar for your outstanding diligence, patience, and willingness to write exhaustively long explanations to editors who have made mistakes, as in your dealings with me and especially in the ] case. ] ] 16:19, 26 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|}<!--Template:The Barnstar of Diligence--> |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] |
|
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You've beat me to reverting vandalism a few times this morning; I think that your anti-vandalism work deserves some recognition! ] <sup>(])</sup> 15:41, 4 March 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|}<!--template:The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar--> |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] |
|
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Helping Hand Barnstar''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Whether it's new users getting into trouble, or old hands reporting vandalism, or whatever - you always seem to be there helping and supporting people -- ] (]) 11:35, 17 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] |
|
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your timely contribution at ]. ] (]) 06:46, 24 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] |
|
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Adopt-a-user Barnstar''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For assisting me with all of my questions and always providing excellent information. Thank you for all the thought you have put into your messages for me. ] (]) 17:06, 29 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
{{collapse bottom}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== My work for Misplaced Pages == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{User Wikipedian For|year=2006|month=08|day=01}} |
|
{{User Wikipedian For|year=2006|month=08|day=01}} |
|
{{User:EVula/Userboxes/admin since|year=2010|month=6|day=21}} |
|
{{User:EVula/Userboxes/admin since|year=2010|month=6|day=21}} |
|
{{clear}} |
|
{{clear}} |
|
I created this account on 1 August 2006, and made my first edit on 11 August 2006. I created the account because one day I tried to edit at the local library, but found the IP was blocked because of vandalism. I think I had probably made a few edits anonymously, but I don't actually remember. |
|
I created this account on 1 August 2006, and made my first edit on 11 August 2006. I created the account because one day I tried to edit at the local library, but found the IP was blocked because of vandalism. I think I had previously made a few edits anonymously, but I don't remember anything about those edits. |
|
|
|
|
It is now the 31st of March 2012, and this is my 71,520th edit. |
|
|
|
|
|
I started making very small edits, mostly minor corrections when I noticed errors in articles. This has continued to be a significant part of my editing, but I have sometimes made more substantial edits to articles. I have created a few new articles, but this has never been a major part of my editing. As time passed I gradually found that problems I found led me into other areas, including reverting vandalism, discussions on policy and administrative issues. Eventually there came a time when vandalism fighting was the main focus of my work. I was then asked by an administrator who had seen my anti-vandalism work to consider becoming an administrator myself, and, after some consideration, I decided to take up the offer. |
|
|
|
|
|
Since I have been an administrator I have contributed to a number of admin areas, particularly anti-vandal work, reviewing unblock requests, and clearing up backlogs of speedy-deletion candidates. Other aspects admin work I have sometimes contributed to include closing redirect discussions, Requests for permissions/Rollback, requests for help from an admin, Usernames for administrator attention, Misplaced Pages:Articles for creation/Redirects, Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations, Miscellany for deletion, Misplaced Pages:Usernames for administrator attention and Requests for page protection. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I originally used the user name JamesBWatson, but I was unhappy with a username which looked like a real name but wasn't, so on 19 September 2019 I had my user name changed to JBW, which also has the advantage of being quicker to type. |
|
I try hard to be welcoming to good faith new users, believing it is worth the effort of trying to explain why a contribution is unacceptable, rather than simply throwing a link to a guideline. Unfortunately I do not always succeed in making new users feel welcome, but I get enough thanks to know that I often do succeed. When dealing with new users I am a '''very strong''' believer in avoiding the use of ]. Yes, it takes longer to type "<nowiki>]</nowiki>" than "<nowiki>]</nowiki>", or "<nowiki>]</nowiki>" than "<nowiki>]</nowiki>", but if the purpose is to help the editor, not simply to dismiss them, it is worth the effort. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I started making very small edits, mostly minor corrections when I noticed errors in articles, but before long I came to make more substantial edits to articles. I have created a few new articles, but this has never been a major part of my editing. As time passed I gradually found that problems I found led me into other areas, including reverting vandalism, discussions on policy and administrative issues. Eventually there came a time when vandalism fighting was the main focus of my work. I was then asked by an administrator who had seen my anti-vandalism work to consider becoming an administrator myself, so that I could deal directly with vandals, instead of reporting them for someone else to follow up. I became an administrator on 21 June 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I try hard to be welcoming to good faith new users, believing it is worth the effort of trying to explain why a contribution is unacceptable, rather than simply throwing a link to a guideline. Unfortunately I don't always live up to the standards I would like to, and sometimes slip into being less welcoming than I think I should, but I get enough thanks to know that I sometimes do succeed. When dealing with new users I am a '''very strong''' believer in avoiding the use of ]. Yes, it takes longer to type "<nowiki>]</nowiki>" than "<nowiki>]</nowiki>", or "<nowiki>]</nowiki>" than "<nowiki>]</nowiki>", but if the purpose is to help the editor, not simply to dismiss them, it is worth the effort. |
|
Misplaced Pages gets an enormous amount of use. This is not only because there is a lot of stuff here, but also because on the whole most of it is of a fairly good quality. Misplaced Pages would not have the amount of success it has unless most of its material was of a reasonably high quality. Unfortunately, in an encyclopaedia which anyone can edit, a lot of the editing is not of a good quality. Misplaced Pages's success therefore depends to a great extent on a large number of volunteers who give up a large amount of their own time to clean things up, improve the quality of what is there, and remove what is not so good. Some Wikipedians choose not to spend time on that, but to concentrate only on writing new content. That is absolutely fine, but sometimes those who make that choice disparage and vilify the work of others who make a different choice, and that is not absolutely fine. Writing content and cleaning up what is there are both essential and constructive parts of building the encyclopaedia. Some people make balanced contributions to both areas, others choose to concentrate on one area or the other. Whichever choice we make we can all respect others who contribute in different ways. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Misplaced Pages gets an enormous amount of use. This is not only because there is a lot of stuff here, but also because on the whole most of it is of a fairly good quality. Misplaced Pages would not have the amount of success it has unless most of its material was of a reasonably high quality. Unfortunately, in an encyclopaedia which anyone can edit, a lot of the editing is not of a good quality. Misplaced Pages's success therefore depends to a great extent on a large number of volunteers who give up a considerable amount of their own time to clean things up, improve the quality of what is there, and remove what is not so good. Some Wikipedians choose not to spend time on that, but to concentrate only on writing new content. That is absolutely fine, but sometimes those who make that choice disparage and vilify the work of others who make a different choice, and that is not absolutely fine. Writing content and cleaning up what is there are both essential and constructive parts of building the encyclopaedia. Some people make balanced contributions to both areas, others choose to concentrate on one area or the other. Whichever choice we make we can all respect others who contribute in different ways. |
|
== Me in real life == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
===Other accounts=== |
|
My name is not James, nor Watson, nor do I have the middle initial "B". Why JamesBWatson then? No special reason. When I first registered on Misplaced Pages I intended to use my real name, or a version of it if someone else had already taken it. However, I found myself reading a message warning me that using your real name on Misplaced Pages might not be a good idea, and, doubtful about it, I picked the first fictitious name I thought of. In one of the Sherlock Holmes stories Dr Watson is referred to as "James" (though elsewhere his name is given as "John"). I think the B was a reference to an old friend whose name really is James (but not Watson). It mildly amuses me when Wikipedians address me, in a friendly manner as "James" or, more rarely, refer to me contemptuously as "Watson". However, feel free to do either or both of these: I am quite happy with it. |
|
|
|
* In my early days on Misplaced Pages I created a number of alternative accounts. Each of them was created for a specific purpose, but it turned out that apart from one account I rarely or never used any of them, and I have long since lost the passwords to them, so I will never use them again. The one exception is ], which I have continued to use reasonably frequently since I created the account in September 2015. That account exists for use when I need to make large numbers of automated edits, almost always mass reverts of sockpuppet edits. In that situation I use that account in order to prevent huge numbers of automatic edits swamping the user history of my main account, which would be likely to make it difficult for editors to find more significant edits in the history. |
|
|
* The following are other alternative accounts. As far as I know this is a complete list, but if I created some account in 2007 or thereabouts, never used it, and forgot all about it, I apologise for omitting it from this list. As I said above, I have lost the passwords to all of these accounts, so they are purely historical. |
|
|
:: ] was set up with the intention that I would use it in insecure environments, such as public computers, where access to an admin account might be problematic. For a while I very occasionally used it. I created the account ] when I had forgotten the password to JamesAWatson, but I then found the password, so I never used JamesCWatson. |
|
|
:: ] was created to see how blocks look to blocked editors, so that I can be in a better position to advise them when there is a need to refer to the messages that are displayed to blocked users. ] was created for the same purpose after I lost the password to JBW test account. |
|
|
:: ] was likewise created to see how account renames look to the renamed user. |
|
|
:: ] was used only to edit IP block notices. |
|
|
:: ] was created for a test of semiprotection, where I needed an unconfirmed account for the test. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Other accounts with similar names are not mine. In most cases thay are impersonation accounts or troll accounts, but a few of them were legitimate accounts created before mine. Impersonation & troll accounts include, but are not necessarily restricted to: ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]. On the other hand ] is a legitimate account nothing to do with me. There are dozens of accounts unconnected to me with user names beginning "JBW" which are, as far as I know, perfectly legitimate accounts, but I will not attempt to list them all. |
|
I am a graduate mathematician, and some of my editing has been in mathematical articles. However, this is a fairly small proportion of my total work on Misplaced Pages. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
<small> I have an alternative account at ]. It is intended to be used only in insecure environments, such as public computers, where access to an admin account might be problematic. At present I have not used it. I may or may not use it in the future. </small> |
|
|
|
] |
I created this account on 1 August 2006, and made my first edit on 11 August 2006. I created the account because one day I tried to edit at the local library, but found the IP was blocked because of vandalism. I think I had previously made a few edits anonymously, but I don't remember anything about those edits.
I originally used the user name JamesBWatson, but I was unhappy with a username which looked like a real name but wasn't, so on 19 September 2019 I had my user name changed to JBW, which also has the advantage of being quicker to type.
I started making very small edits, mostly minor corrections when I noticed errors in articles, but before long I came to make more substantial edits to articles. I have created a few new articles, but this has never been a major part of my editing. As time passed I gradually found that problems I found led me into other areas, including reverting vandalism, discussions on policy and administrative issues. Eventually there came a time when vandalism fighting was the main focus of my work. I was then asked by an administrator who had seen my anti-vandalism work to consider becoming an administrator myself, so that I could deal directly with vandals, instead of reporting them for someone else to follow up. I became an administrator on 21 June 2010.
I try hard to be welcoming to good faith new users, believing it is worth the effort of trying to explain why a contribution is unacceptable, rather than simply throwing a link to a guideline. Unfortunately I don't always live up to the standards I would like to, and sometimes slip into being less welcoming than I think I should, but I get enough thanks to know that I sometimes do succeed. When dealing with new users I am a very strong believer in avoiding the use of opaque acronyms. Yes, it takes longer to type "]" than "]", or "]" than "]", but if the purpose is to help the editor, not simply to dismiss them, it is worth the effort.
Misplaced Pages gets an enormous amount of use. This is not only because there is a lot of stuff here, but also because on the whole most of it is of a fairly good quality. Misplaced Pages would not have the amount of success it has unless most of its material was of a reasonably high quality. Unfortunately, in an encyclopaedia which anyone can edit, a lot of the editing is not of a good quality. Misplaced Pages's success therefore depends to a great extent on a large number of volunteers who give up a considerable amount of their own time to clean things up, improve the quality of what is there, and remove what is not so good. Some Wikipedians choose not to spend time on that, but to concentrate only on writing new content. That is absolutely fine, but sometimes those who make that choice disparage and vilify the work of others who make a different choice, and that is not absolutely fine. Writing content and cleaning up what is there are both essential and constructive parts of building the encyclopaedia. Some people make balanced contributions to both areas, others choose to concentrate on one area or the other. Whichever choice we make we can all respect others who contribute in different ways.