| Revision as of 17:41, 2 August 2012 editSNAAAAKE!! (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users96,243 edits →GA revamp← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 05:30, 20 October 2024 edit undoCukie Gherkin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Rollbackers18,249 edits ReassessedTag: Manual revert |
| (88 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{WikiProject Video games|class=C|importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Square Enix|class=C|importance=high}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Fictional characters|class=C}} |
|
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
|action1=GAN |
|
|action1=GAN |
| Line 32: |
Line 30: |
|
|action5oldid=188423277 |
|
|action5oldid=188423277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action6=GAN |
|
|currentstatus=DGA |
|
|
|
|action6date=21:15, 14 August 2012 |
|
|
|action6link=Talk:Yuna (Final Fantasy)/GA1 |
|
|
|action6result=listed |
|
|
|action6oldid=507436261 |
|
|
|currentstatus=GA |
|
|
|topic= video games |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA| |
|
|
{{WikiProject Video games|class=GA|importance=mid|Characters=yes|characters-importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Square Enix|class=GA|importance=high}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Fictional characters}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Women}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{refideas |
|
|
|1=https://www.rpgfan.com/feature/fempower-up-48-amazing-women-in-rpgs-part-4/ |
|
|
|2=https://magmix.jp/post/91547/2 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Archives}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Geez, the reception section here is such a mess == |
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, if someone would actually try and rewrite it, here is some more NOTABLE reception (instead of stupid "she looks like ..." opinions on random websites and such): |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*'']'' (also Tidus) |
|
|
*'']'' (also Paine) |
|
|
|
|
|
--] (]) 10:45, 30 April 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Then ]-] (]) 13:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
It's not "mine" article, so you be bold. --] (]) 13:16, 4 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:].] (]) 14:35, 4 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
Also (]). --] (]) 13:20, 4 May 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Okinawan kimono? KIMONO of Okinawa style does not exist. == |
|
|
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_SdA_Z-aRPsw/SxTAIyN627I/AAAAAAAAABU/6f0ULnWBdW4/s1600/hakama2.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/16/Mariko%27s_Graduation_%2796.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
It is style of HAKMA obviously. HAKAMA is Japanese clothing(not Okinawa style). |
|
|
|
|
|
A developer is a Japanese. The Japanese knows HAKAMA by all means. Would a fan make the word "Okinawan kimonos"(LOL)? |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 07:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Discussion == |
|
|
|
|
|
A centralized discussion whether we should use video games as sources for voice actors in this article is taking place ]. ] ] (] - ]) 01:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Just no refs in the leads altogether. --] (]) 01:44, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Please read ] on how to use citations in the lead section. Also, per the relevant guideline, "The presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article." Thanks, ] ] (] - ]) 01:51, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::When Advent Children got de-GAd, presence of refs in the lead was one of the reasons. (And I only then noticed how FAs are like that.) --] (]) 01:57, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::At least we should use few or none citations to comply with WP:LEADCITE. However, the guideline states that there is not an exception to citation requirements specific to leads, as this is a non-controversial article. As such, you are free to add a few citations. ] ] (] - ]) 02:00, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Better just run a fine copyedit through this article because I suck at English tenses. --] (]) 02:07, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:Since I am a good copyeditor, I am going to copyedit the article myself. ] ] (] - ]) 02:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
Reception too. --] (]) 02:44, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
By "copyedit", I didn't mean "revert all my work, then keep reverting". --] (]) 15:20, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
STOP IT. --] (]) 15:23, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:Please calm down. It would be more helpful if you were more ]. ] ] (] - ]) 15:25, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::So don't revert my work when I asked you to do "a fine copyedit". If I wanted you to "go and revert all my edits, and keep reverting", I'd say this, but I asked to correct any grammar errors. --] (]) 15:31, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
And you can still do it now. --] (]) 15:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== External links modified == |
|
:Sjones23 said he was going to copyedit the article and nobody disagreed so wait for him to finish before editing to avoid edit conflicts.] (]) 15:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::'''I''' asked him to do a copyedit, and then I even asked him to do "Reception too". I just didn't ask him to start by reverting all of my (prior) edits, and then to keep reverting them, without discussing or even not explaining anything. And that's a disruption. --] (]) 15:52, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I had to revert some of the edits, because I felt some of them were tedious and had spelling errors. I have no intention of disruption in anyway, but I don't want people to interfere with copyedits, so please wait until I finish ''before'' editing to avoid edit conflicts. I am requesting a GOCE copyedit as well to see if others can help. ] ] (] - ]) 16:07, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|
I think it's pretty much complete. Unlike ]. --] (]) 16:39, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have just modified 3 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|
== GA revamp == |
|
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131114122727/http://www.gamesradar.com/exclusive-interview-final-fantasy-x-2/ to http://www.gamesradar.com/exclusive-interview-final-fantasy-x-2/ |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120818033412/http://ps2.ign.com/articles/458/458474p5.html to http://ps2.ign.com/articles/458/458474p5.html |
|
|
*Added archive https://archive.is/2013.10.14-181754/http://www.1up.com/news/snake-beats-mario-coolest-video to http://www.1up.com/news/snake-beats-mario-coolest-video |
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|
Here's what we need to do to get this article revamped for GA: |
|
|
*'''Lead''' - must be expanded to three or four paragraphs. |
|
|
*'''Creation and development''' - find anything on voice acting and how they got into it. Also, expand upon the development section with information from other staff members as well. |
|
|
*'''Reception section''' - needs to be expanded with FFX reviews, and we should mention reviewer names for websites. See ] and ] for examples. |
|
|
*'''Copyedit''' - even though it is done, just another run through should do. |
|
|
Any other comments would be appreciated. Thanks, ] ] (] - ]) 17:09, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|
:Nope on "reviewer names for websites". Because I didn't do it to (]). Raiden and Cloud use the names only because someone placed them and might be as well all removed because it's all redunant (the names are all in the references already), they're not requisite for anything. --] (]) 17:24, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::I disagree. I think reviewers are ] and I am discussing about this on ] to seek others' opinions about it. I feel that we should just at least mention them in the body of the article to explain unfamiliar readers of the article. ] ] (] - ]) 17:30, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::That's your opinion what makes a GA, and I showed you how I ACTUALLY made an A (which is higher than GA). Reviewers are notable when they have their articles (and the policy that you just linked as "]" refers precisely to this notability needed for any subject to have an own article). --] (]) 17:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::::I have already moved the discussion to ] to seek more opinions there. Please wait until I speak with them. ] ] (] - ]) 17:39, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::You sure love debating. --] (]) 17:41, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 05:45, 5 May 2017 (UTC) |
|
:Also the lead is already "expanded to three or four paragraphs". More precisely, to three. --] (]) 17:28, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== "Menaching"? == |
|
And the actual problems were all listed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Yuna_(Final_Fantasy)/1 --] (]) 17:31, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't want to step on toes but that looks like a typo ] (]) 03:36, 30 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
:These were already addressed by other users as well. ] ] (] - ]) 17:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
