Misplaced Pages

User talk:Coren: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:47, 3 August 2012 editYoureallycan (talk | contribs)12,095 edits Undid revision 505511297 by Ryulong (talk)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:52, 10 July 2024 edit undoJonesey95 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Template editors375,012 edits Notification: listing of Template:Csb-day at WP:Templates for discussion.Tag: Twinkle 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{usertalkheader}} {{Talk header}}


{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|algo = old(7d)
|minthreadsleft = 1
|archive = User talk:Coren/Archive/%(year)d/%(monthname)s
|algo = old(3d)
|archive = User talk:Coren/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s
}} }}

{{AutoArchivingNotice|age=3|dounreplied=yes|bot=MiszaBot|botlink=User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo}}
{{/Archives}} {{/Archives}}


== ''Bots Newsletter'', December 2021 ==
== CSFRS ==


{|style="box-sizing:border-box;background:#f0f8ff; border:1px solid #7Cb9e8; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius:8px;" role="presentation"
"I have performed a web search with the contents of Central Sierra Field Research Stations, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~sagehen/CSFRS%20site/CSFRS.htm."
|-
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|''Bots Newsletter'', December 2021
|-
| style="padding-left: .6em;" | ]
{{Image frame
| caption = BRFA activity by month
| content =
{{Graph:Chart
| type = stackedarea
| width = 200
| height = 100
| xAxisAngle = -70
| colors =
#98fb98,
#fb9898,
#9898fb,
#a0a6b0
| x = Sep 19,Oct 19,Nov 19,Dec 19
| y1 = 5,10,3,7
| y2 = 2,0,0,1
| y3 = 2,0,1,0
| y4 = 0,0,0,2
}}
}}
Welcome to the eighth issue of the English Misplaced Pages's ''Bots Newsletter'', your source for all things ]. Maintainers disappeared to parts unknown... bots awakening from the slumber of æons... hundreds of thousands of short descriptions... these stories, ''and more'', are brought to you by Misplaced Pages's most distinguished newsletter about bots.


Our ] was in August 2019, so there's quite a bit of catching up to do. Due to the vast quantity of things that have happened, the next few issues will only cover a few months at a time. This month, we'll go from September 2019 through the end of the year. I won't bore you with further introductions — instead, I'll bore you with a newsletter about bots.
I am the author of that page and I donate the contents to wikipedia. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:33, 31 July 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I've replied on your talk page. &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 04:08, 31 July 2012 (UTC)


<span style="font-size:125%">'''Overall'''</span><br />
== CorenSearchBot identifying Misplaced Pages mirror as 'source' of text ==
* Between September and December 2019, there were 33 ]s. Of these, {{yeac}} 25 were approved, and 8 were unsuccessful ({{nayd}} 3 denied, {{idkc}} 3 withdrawn, and ] 2 expired).


<span style="font-size:125%">'''September 2019'''</span>
Hello. Not a big deal, but re. , could the bot be enhanced so that any Misplaced Pages mirror pages are not picked up as possible sources of copyrighted text? In this case "From Misplaced Pages" is perhaps something that the bot could pick up as an indication to ignore a page, although in this case the whole site is not a mirror. The article concerned was based on a similar competition from another league, so the content is similar to the other WP article. Thanks. --] (]) 11:55, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
]
:I don't think it's a good idea to try to detect mirrors automatically, but when we find one that pops up regularly, we can add it to ], and it will be ignored from that point. &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 12:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
* {{yeac}} ], ], ], ], ] · {{nayd}} ], ] · {{idkc}} ], ]
::From , it appears is another mirror. I'll leave it up to you to determine if it pops up regularly. ] (]) 18:26, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
*'''TParis goes away, UTRSBot goes kaput''': ] ] that ] for maintaining on-wiki records of ] appeals stopped working a while ago. ], the semi-retired user who had previously run it, said they were "unlikely to return to actively editing Misplaced Pages", and the bot had been vanquished by trolls submitting bogus UTRS requests on behalf of real blocked users. While ] was a potential fix, neither maintainer had time to implement it. TParis offered to access to the UTRS WMFLabs account to any admin identified with the WMF: "I miss you guys a whole lot but I've also moved on with my life. Good luck, let me know how I can help". Ultimately, ] ended up in charge. Some progress was made, and the bot continued to work another couple months — but as of press time, UTRSBot has not edited since November 2019.
*'''Article-measuring contest resumed''': The ], which had lain dead for several years, was triumphantly resurrected by ] following a ].


<span style="font-size:125%">'''October 2019'''</span>
== Good job. Wanna do it again? ==
* {{yeac}} ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]
*'''Curb Safe Charmer adopts reFill''': ] ] that ]'s bug reports were going unanswered; creator ] had retired from Misplaced Pages, and a maintainer was needed. As of June 2021, ] had ], saying: "Not that I have all the skills needed but better me than nobody! 'Maintainer' might be too strong a term though. Volunteers welcome!" <br />


<span style="font-size:125%">'''November 2019'''</span>
Hi, Coren. I left a general note ] but wanted to single you out for your especially eloquent closing comments. I don't suppose there's any chance we could rope you in over ], is there? (I see you didn't participate in ] but can't recall if you were "involved" earlier.) ] (]) 07:46, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
]
:Thanks for the vote of confidence, but I hold (and have expressed) rather strong opinions on pending changes in the past and I expect closing by me could make some of the participant uncomfortable &ndash; regardless of how neutral I might strive to be. &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 10:49, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
* {{yeac}} ], ], ] · {{idkc}} ]
::Damn, I was afraid of that. If you can think of anyone else brave or foolhardy enough who might have been neutral on the topic, that would be great. (Sandstein is involved. I just asked Jc37 but am not holding my breath.) ] (]) 19:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
*'''Old bots do new tricks''': ] prowled redirects, ] archived ] requests, and ] removed links to ] deleted at ] (until its authorization was revoked in January at operator ]'s ]).
:::That's not going to be trivial: many of the most established longtime editors that would normally be tapped to close a big contentious decision like that are also the ones most likely to have a very definite opinion about a substantial change like PC. I might recommend asking ], ], and ]; I don't know how involved they may have been in the debate in the past, but they are very well respected and I trust them implicitly. &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 19:14, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
:::Oh, you might want to ask ]; he's a relatively recent administrator, so he may have had no prior involvement, and he's already gained quite a bit of community respect with his demeanour and acumen. &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 19:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
::::Risker and Casliber are involved. Not sure if Newyorkbrad would be willing again, but it's a thought. Dennis hadn't occurred to me, but I agree with you about his demeanor and acumen. Thanks for the suggestions. (Btw, whatever your opinions on PC—and I haven't looked to see—it would be nice to get a few more eyes on ] before it heads into the RfC stage. If you have any spare time . . .) ] (]) 07:51, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
:::::Yeah, I'm definitely involved so couldn't wear an admin hat at all.....thanks for thinking of me though XD ] (] '''·''' ]) 10:30, 31 July 2012 (UTC)


<span style="font-size:125%">'''December 2019'''</span>
== Thank you! ==
* {{yeac}} ], ], ], ], ], ], ] · {{nayd}} ] ·] ], ]
*'''Redirects to be autopatrolled''': A ] at ], closing with unanimous consensus that new ] should be ] by bot. ] wasted no time, and submitted ] the next day; it passed two days after that.
*'''200,000 bios get short descs''': Along a similar vein, ] was approved to remove disambiguation pages from ] and a new bot (]) changed lots of ] links to ] using ]. One particularly neat task, ], automatically generated ] for more than 200,000 biographies.


<span style="font-size:150%">'''In the next issue of ''Bots Newsletter'':'''</span><br />
Barnstar archivated. Thank you, it's appreciated; but much of the credit goes to the well-organized RfC and the decorum of the participants which made analysis easy. &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 17:56, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?
*What happens when two bots want to clerk the same page?
*What happens when an adminbot goes hog wild?
*Will reFill ever get fixed?
*What's up with ], anyway?
*Python 3.4 deprecation? In ''my'' PyWikiBot? (It's more likely than you think!)
These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the January 2022 ''Bots Newsletter''. Tune in, or miss out!


Signing off... ''']'''×''']''' 04:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
== Bobby Gibb ==
----


<small>(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from ].)</small>
*{{la|Bobby Tango Gibb}}
|}
*{{la|bobby tango gibb}}
<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Bots/Spam&oldid=1059552212 -->
hi Coren. I am trying to create a page and it is apparently being challenged for deletion. I also enterd the info twice after a correction and received a message about it. I entered the info as it is pertinent info about myself. I have never entered info on here before and need assistance in making corrections. Many of my colleagues have entered info concerning themselves and have had no issues. My name is Bobby Tango Gibb, and I am a former member of the rock band Bang Tango. But I am trying to create a page as no one knows the info entered better than me, so when I am searched my Misplaced Pages info is included.Any suggestion would be great as how to step by step enter the correct information and publish it. Thank you! <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:55, 31 July 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*] is my standard advice of long standing on this subject, if you want to use it, Coren. ] (]) 22:41, 31 July 2012 (UTC)


== Bots Newsletter, January 2022 ==
== CorenSearchBot reporting an article as a copy of itself ==


{|style="box-sizing:border-box;background:#f0f8ff; border:1px solid #7Cb9e8; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius:8px;" role="presentation"
to ] reporting that the article appears to be a substantial copy of ] seems rather peculiar. The page is now at AfD for other reasons, but the bug seemed worth reporting. --] (]) 08:39, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
|-
:Yeah, that sometimes happens when an article has been indexed by yahoo so fast that by the time CSBot looks, it's already been indexed ''and'' the article's name contains a single quote/apostrophe (which defeats the code meant to prevent that). Sorry for the trouble. &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 11:17, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|''Bots Newsletter'', January 2022
::No trouble, it was more amusing than anything. Thanks for the explanation. --] (]) 12:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
|-
| style="padding-left: .6em;" | ]
{{Image frame
| caption = BRFA activity by month
| content =
{{Graph:Chart
| type = stackedarea
| width = 200
| height = 100
| xAxisAngle = -70
| colors =
#98fb98,
#fb9898,
#9898fb,
#a0a6b0
| x = Jan 20,Feb 20,Mar 20,Apr 20,May 20,Jun 20
| y1 = 3,6,12,13,14,11
| y2 = 2,1,0,1,3,1
| y3 = 0,0,0,0,1,1
| y4 = 0,0,1,1,0,0
}}
}}
Welcome to the ninth issue of the English Misplaced Pages's ''Bots Newsletter'', your source for all things ]. Vicious bot-on-bot edit warring... superseded tasks... policy proposals... these stories, and more, are brought to you by Misplaced Pages's most distinguished newsletter about bots.

After a long hiatus between August 2019 and December 2021, there's quite a bit of ground to cover. Due to the vastness, I decided in December to split the coverage up into a few installments that covered six months each. Some people thought this was a good idea, since covering an entire year in a single issue would make it unmanageably large. Others thought this was stupid, since they were getting talk page messages about crap from almost three years ago. Ultimately, the question of whether each issue covers six months or a year is only relevant for a couple more of them, and then the problem will be behind us forever.

Of course, you can also look on the bright side – we are making progress, and this issue will only be about crap from almost ''two'' years ago. Today we will pick up where we left off in December, and go through the first half of 2020.

<span style="font-size:150%">'''Overall'''</span><br />
In the first half of 2020, there were 71 ]s. Of these, {{yeac}} 59 were approved, and 12 were unsuccessful (with {{nayd}} 8 denied, {{idkc}} 2 withdrawn, and ] 2 expired).

<span style="font-size:125%">'''January 2020'''</span>
{{multiple image
| total_width = 400
| height1 = 60
| height2 = 60
| height3 = 60
| height4 = 60
| image1=Albino Olive Python (Liasis olivaceus).jpg | alt1=A python
| image2=Albino Olive Python (Liasis olivaceus).jpg | alt2=A python
| image3=Albino Olive Python (Liasis olivaceus).jpg | alt3=A python
| image4=Albino Olive Python (Liasis olivaceus) (cropped to 40%).jpg | alt4=0.4 pythons
| footer = Yeah, you're not gonna be able to get away with this anymore.
}}
* {{yeac}} ], ], ] · {{nayd}} ], ]
*A new ] release dropped support for ], and it was expected that support for ] would be removed in coming updates. ] itself planned to drop Python 2 support in 2022.
*Two new bots dropped in January 2020: ], the successor to ], and ], whose task was to perform a weekly update of four "massive" wikitables for ].
*], an ] operated by ] since 2006, was ] after going berserk on categories that hadn't yet been ]'d.


<span style="font-size:125%">'''February 2020'''</span>
== Conclusion ==
]
* {{yeac}} ], ], ], ], ], ] · {{nayd}} ]
*On February 1, some ] were raised about ] performing "nonsense" edits. Semi-active operator ] (who originally coded the ] of ]) was pinged. Meanwhile, the bot was temporarily <span class="plainlinks"></span> for several hours until the issue was diagnosed and resolved.
*On February 18, ] got into a <span class="plainlinks"></span> with ], and had to be partially-blocked from ].


<span style="font-size:125%">'''March 2020'''</span>
Thank you very much for your response.but, as a matter of fact I am curious regarding several points. I wish you would be able to answer. First of all, I am still unaware what was that issue of blocking me in coincidence. I see that there is no ] case against me neither any complaint from others. So, What was the need of checking the contributions of mine occurred from which IP.( Or probably using check user tool to see my IP , not sure how it is called) Doesn't it violates privacy policy ? Second one my room partner ] and I share same computer. So, why not blocked him ; but only me? Thanks. ] (]) 17:42, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
* {{yeac}} ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] ·] ]
:Part of the job of checkuser is to help protect the project from disruption in the cases where normal administrators cannot; users returning in avoidance of a ban is such a case, and we often proceed on our own discretions in such cases (and, honestly, a very new editor jumping in on one of the noticeboards to comment about a different process while already clearly aware of jargon and procedure is one of the things we watch for, as it is ''extremely'' atypical of "real" new editors).
* In March, a long ] was started at ] by ] about the troubling trend of bots "expiring" without explanation after their owners became inactive. This can happen for a variety of reasons -- ] changes break code, hosting providers' software updates break code, hosting accounts lapse, software changes make bots' edits unnecessary, and policy changes make bots' edits unwanted. The most promising solution seemed to be ] hosting (although it has some problems of its own, like the occasional necessity of refactoring code).
:I didn't block your roommate simply because I had not ''noticed'' him as matching you. We sometimes have cause to "widen the net" and look ''around'' the editors when we do a check, but even if you were in fact a sock your behaviour was not so egregious as to warrant it; we usually take care to make minimal use of checkuser when it suffices.
* Some of the twelve bot tasks approved this month were ] (removing blocked users from ]), and ] (removing ''unblocked'' users from ]). ] was approved to refine geographic stub tags. New bots approved this month were ] (to patrol ]), ] (to merge stub tags), and ] (fixing DISPLAYTITLE modifications, DEFAULTSORT errors and broken behavior switches in ]).
:Finally, the privacy policy explicitly allows a few users to look at private information &ndash; just not to then disseminate that information publicly. We are always extremely careful to not divulge what we can see using the tools, and any information we find (or you tell us) is kept strictly confidential. &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 17:57, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
<span style="font-size:125%">'''April 2020'''</span>
]
* {{yeac}} ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] · {{nayd}} ] ·] ]
*A ] on the bot noticeboard, "Re-examination of ListeriaBot", was started by ], who pointed out repeated operation outside the scope of its BRFA (i.e. editing pages in mainspace, and adding ] to others). Some said it was doing good work, and others said it was operating beyond its remit. It was <span class="plainlinks"></span> on April 10; the next day it was unblocked, reblocked from article space, reblocked "for specified non-editing actions", unblocked, and indeffed. The next week, several ] were implemented in its code by Magnus; the bot was allowed to roam free once more on April 18.
*] joined the stable in April, after a BRFA started in December was finally completed. As an adminbot, it was authorized to block ]es belonging to ], public ]s, and ]s. New tasks approved for existing bots included ] (] categories), ] (taking over some tasks from the inactive ]), and ] (updating data at {{tl|Interactive COVID-19 maps}}). Also, ] was approved to scale down non-free ]s — I didn't even know that was a thing.
* A ] at ] was started by ] about whether ] should explicitly specify that bot operators must be responsive to concerns raised on English Misplaced Pages specifically (as opposed to ], ], ], et cetera). Eventually, the policy was amended to its ]:
:<blockquote>Issues and enquiries are typically expected to be handled on the English Misplaced Pages. Pages reachable via ], like a talk page at ] or at ] could also be acceptable External sites like ] or ] (which require separate registration or do not allow for IP comments) and email (which can compromise ]) can supplement on-wiki communication, but do not replace it.</blockquote>


<span style="font-size:125%">'''May 2020'''</span>
== Help! - Don't know how to remove tags from our page, and your copyright infringement info is wrong. ==
]
* {{yeac}} ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] · {{nayd}} ], ], ] · {{idkc}} ]
*], an impressively meta bot task, was approved this month for maintaining a list of bots running on the English Misplaced Pages. The page, located at ], is updated every 24 hours; it contains a list of all accounts with the bot flag, as well as their operator, edit count, last activity date, last edit date, last logged action date, user groups and block status.
*Other approvals for this month were ] (processing redirects in {{tl|R from scientific name}}), ] (allowing users to schedule bot reminders for themselves), ] (removing blocked/locked users from ]), ] (updating ]), ] (adding <nowiki>{{</nowiki>]|living=no<nowiki>}}</nowiki> to talk pages where their associated article is in a year of death category), and ] (deleting and nominating empty categories).
*General syntax fixing tasks were approved for ], ], ], ], ], and ], as well as ] ], ], and ].
*Seven bots who fell below ] (with neither the bots nor their operators having any edits or logged actions in two years) had their bot flags removed. They were ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].
*On May 12, ] was ].


<span style="font-size:125%">'''June 2020'''</span>
Dear Coren:
]
* {{yeac}} ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] · {{nayd}} ] · {{idkc}} ]
*In July 2017, ] made a ] that a section of the ] be devoted to bots and technical issues. In November 2019, ] code was written superseding ]'s tasks on that page, and operator ] was asked to stop them so that the new code could be deployed. After no response to pings, a ] of Legobot for the dashboard was proposed. Some months later, on June 16, Headbomb said: "A full block serves nothing. A partial block solves all current issues Just fucking do it. It's been 3 years now." The next day, however, Legoktm disabled the task, and the dashboard was successfully refactored.
*On June 7, ] blocked ] for ], saying it was "still removing links after request to stop". A couple weeks later, a ] was opened, saying "it is a widely-used and useful bot, but it has one of the longest block logs for any recently-operating bot on Misplaced Pages". While its last BRFA approval was in 2011, its code and functionality had changed dramatically since then, and ] requested that BAG require a new BRFA. Maintainer ] responded that most blocks were from years ago (when it lacked a proper ]), and problems since then had mostly been one-off errors (like a ] in which a ] had "weaponized" the bot to harass editors).
*] opened a discussion about ], and proposed that they not. He cited a recent case in which a maintainer had said "I can only suppose that the code that is available on GitHub is not the actual code that was running on ". Some disagreed: ] said that "I like free software as much as the next person, and I strongly believe that bot operators should make their bot code public, but I don't think it should be that they must do so".
*Two new bots had their first BRFAs approved: ], to replace ] for handling the ], and ], to remove {{tl|user sandbox}} from articles in draftspace using ].


<span style="font-size:150%">'''Conclusion'''</span><br />
Please forgive me, I still don't have the hang of WIKIPEDIA, we will be hiring someone soon who does. I'm not sure I'm even writing you in the correct space.
* What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?
:*Will Citation bot ever be set free to roam the project?
:*What's the deal with all those book links that ] is adding to articles?
:*Should we keep using Gerrit for MediaWiki?
:*What if we had a day for bots to make cosmetic edits?
These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the February 2022 ''Bots Newsletter''. Tune in, or miss out!


Signing off... <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">''']'''×''']'''</span> 23:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
I represent a record label and theater production company.
----


<small>(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from ].)</small>
One of our shows, has incorrect info on it from Misplaced Pages:
|}
http://en.wikipedia.org/Love,_Linda:_The_Life_of_Mrs._Cole_Porter
<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Bots/Spam&oldid=1066996263 -->


== The Dark Nebula ==
Firstly, I don't know how to remove this stuff, whicc is inaccurate:
The topic of this article may not meet Misplaced Pages's general notability guideline. Please help to establish notability by adding reliable, secondary sources about the topic. If notability cannot be established, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted. (September 2009)
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2009)


Hi, I tried to place this entry on Misplaced Pages some years ago & was cited as plagiarising an entry on comixpedia. That listing was indeed by me so i was not copying that post but, instead, reposting on Misplaced Pages, unaware that was not appropriate. I am attempting to post this on Misplaced Pages again & would like to know what is required to be removed or altered so that it would indeed be complying with the rules. I'm 62 years of age & not as tech-savvy as i would otherwise like to be.
Secondly, I just now saw your talk back to me:
"What you violated was the copyright policy. Text in the article was copied from other sources. That cannot be--there is a big difference between "listing" and "copying". Removing the reference to Playbill doesn't help at all (and might make it worse); I note that the sentence "Although Cole Porter was gay, their companionship and love lasted through 35 years of marriage and together they lived a spectacular, glamour-filled life" is still "taken" from somewhere else (plagiarism = theft of intellectual property), as a quick Google search verifies. If you wish for this article to live, you will have to write it, not copy it. Hope this helps. Drmies (talk) 17:52, 30 August 2009 (UTC)"


I should point out that comixpedia is no longer what it was. In fact, if you click on the link for Comixpedia or more specifically the entry regarding The Dark Nebula it is all an Indonesian Gaming/Gambling site, nothing to do with The Dark Nebula or Comics in any way, shape or form.
We did NOT lift the text in the article from other sources - that is OUR PROPERTY that was re-quoted in press and news articles. If you Google that line, you'll see it's in all of the promo articles for LOVE, LINDA (!!) - they took it from US.


To be clear the substance of the proposed entry originated from me, including images. I hope a resolution can be reached.
Any help you can offer is so greatly appreciated.


I leave this in your hands.
All my best,
Michele Oliver
] (]) 20:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC)150 Music] (]) 20:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
150 Music/Productions
www.150music.com
:Please read ] to donating your own copyrighted material to Misplaced Pages. Note that, in addition to copyright requirements, the article must still comply with ], ] and avoid ]. &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 21:36, 1 August 2012 (UTC)


Thank you
== False Postives ==
] (]) 08:57, 22 February 2022 (UTC)


== Ten years later ==
Hi, when ] ] of the ] have been splitting articles off, they keep getting told that they are copyvios of http://www.eosnap.com/tropical-storms/ even though that site seems to be copying the PTS article. Can you do anything? Regards.] (]) 12:32, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
:Well, if you still have a lot to do I can suppress the warnings; but if you're about done there isn't much point: the 'bot will only warn on newly created articles, not on further work you do to them. &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 12:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
::Um, because the season is ongoing and there will be more deadly typhoons, i think it would be wise to suppress the warnings please.] (]) 12:53, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
:::Heh. Fair 'nuf. :-) That part of eosnap is now excluded from consideration on matches. &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 13:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)


Hi Coren,
== Youreallycan ==


I resolved when I became an admin that I'd swing by here the first time I had a block overturned, even if you were inactive; and after 6 months and 1,421 blocks that's finally happened, sadly, so here I am. You probably don't remember me, but ten years and two usernames ago (''Francophonie&Androphilie'', kinda cringe name) you indeffed me and then reversed yourself after objections at AN/I. I expected I'd have something to say, when this day did come, about what I've learned from having a block overturned, but really all I can say is that it's unpleasant—both getting it wrong and being told you got it wrong—which is no great insight. But I guess I thought it might please (or at least amuse) you to know I stuck around and am an admin now; and also thought I'd take this as an opportunity to say hi and ask how you've been doing. Maybe you won't see this for a year or won't see it ever, but can't hurt to ask.
* - ]


<span class="nowrap"> <span style="font-family:courier">-- ]</span><sup>]'']</sup> (she&#124;they&#124;xe)</span> 22:13, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Youreallycan is causing issues on ] again, an issue that occurred prior to his block on 20 July 2012, this time in regards to new content that he is insisting is not allowed per ]. Would you please speak with him, either privately or in the discussion taking place on ]?—] (]) 00:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of ] ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – ] (]) 15:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of ] ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – ] (]) 16:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:52, 10 July 2024

This is Coren's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Archives
  Previous years
Older/Undated
2007
   
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec
2008
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec

2009
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec
2010
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec

2011
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec
2012
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec

2013
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec
2014
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec
2015
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec
2016
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec

Bots Newsletter, December 2021

Bots Newsletter, December 2021
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
BRFA activity by month

Welcome to the eighth issue of the English Misplaced Pages's Bots Newsletter, your source for all things bot. Maintainers disappeared to parts unknown... bots awakening from the slumber of æons... hundreds of thousands of short descriptions... these stories, and more, are brought to you by Misplaced Pages's most distinguished newsletter about bots.

Our last issue was in August 2019, so there's quite a bit of catching up to do. Due to the vast quantity of things that have happened, the next few issues will only cover a few months at a time. This month, we'll go from September 2019 through the end of the year. I won't bore you with further introductions — instead, I'll bore you with a newsletter about bots.

Overall

  • Between September and December 2019, there were 33 BRFAs. Of these, Green checkmarkY 25 were approved, and 8 were unsuccessful (Dark red X symbolN2 3 denied, Blue question mark? 3 withdrawn, and Expired 2 expired).

September 2019

Look! It's moving. It's alive. It's alive... It's alive, it's moving, it's alive, it's alive, it's alive, it's alive, IT'S ALIVE!
  • Green checkmarkY Monkbot 16, DannyS712 bot 60, Ahechtbot 6, PearBOT 3, Qbugbot 3 · Dark red X symbolN2 DannyS712 bot 5, PkbwcgsBot 24 · Blue question mark? DannyS712 bot 61, TheSandBot 4
  • TParis goes away, UTRSBot goes kaput: Beeblebrox noted that the bot for maintaining on-wiki records of UTRS appeals stopped working a while ago. TParis, the semi-retired user who had previously run it, said they were "unlikely to return to actively editing Misplaced Pages", and the bot had been vanquished by trolls submitting bogus UTRS requests on behalf of real blocked users. While OAuth was a potential fix, neither maintainer had time to implement it. TParis offered to access to the UTRS WMFLabs account to any admin identified with the WMF: "I miss you guys a whole lot but I've also moved on with my life. Good luck, let me know how I can help". Ultimately, SQL ended up in charge. Some progress was made, and the bot continued to work another couple months — but as of press time, UTRSBot has not edited since November 2019.
  • Article-measuring contest resumed: The list of Wikipedians by article count, which had lain dead for several years, was triumphantly resurrected by GreenC following a bot request.

October 2019

November 2019

Now you're thinking with portals.

December 2019

In the next issue of Bots Newsletter:
What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?

  • What happens when two bots want to clerk the same page?
  • What happens when an adminbot goes hog wild?
  • Will reFill ever get fixed?
  • What's up with ListeriaBot, anyway?
  • Python 3.4 deprecation? In my PyWikiBot? (It's more likely than you think!)

These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the January 2022 Bots Newsletter. Tune in, or miss out!

Signing off... jp×g 04:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)


(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Bots Newsletter, January 2022

Bots Newsletter, January 2022
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
BRFA activity by month

Welcome to the ninth issue of the English Misplaced Pages's Bots Newsletter, your source for all things bot. Vicious bot-on-bot edit warring... superseded tasks... policy proposals... these stories, and more, are brought to you by Misplaced Pages's most distinguished newsletter about bots.

After a long hiatus between August 2019 and December 2021, there's quite a bit of ground to cover. Due to the vastness, I decided in December to split the coverage up into a few installments that covered six months each. Some people thought this was a good idea, since covering an entire year in a single issue would make it unmanageably large. Others thought this was stupid, since they were getting talk page messages about crap from almost three years ago. Ultimately, the question of whether each issue covers six months or a year is only relevant for a couple more of them, and then the problem will be behind us forever.

Of course, you can also look on the bright side – we are making progress, and this issue will only be about crap from almost two years ago. Today we will pick up where we left off in December, and go through the first half of 2020.

Overall
In the first half of 2020, there were 71 BRFAs. Of these, Green checkmarkY 59 were approved, and 12 were unsuccessful (with Dark red X symbolN2 8 denied, Blue question mark? 2 withdrawn, and Expired 2 expired).

January 2020

A pythonA pythonA python0.4 pythonsYeah, you're not gonna be able to get away with this anymore.

February 2020

Speaking of WikiProject Molecular Biology, Listeria went wild in February

March 2020

April 2020

Listeria being examined

Issues and enquiries are typically expected to be handled on the English Misplaced Pages. Pages reachable via unified login, like a talk page at Commons or at Italian Misplaced Pages could also be acceptable External sites like Phabricator or GitHub (which require separate registration or do not allow for IP comments) and email (which can compromise anonymity) can supplement on-wiki communication, but do not replace it.

May 2020

We heard you like bots, so we made a bot that reports the status of your bots, so now you can use bots while you use bots

June 2020

A partial block averted at the eleventh hour for the robot that makes Legos

Conclusion

  • What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?
  • Will Citation bot ever be set free to roam the project?
  • What's the deal with all those book links that InternetArchiveBot is adding to articles?
  • Should we keep using Gerrit for MediaWiki?
  • What if we had a day for bots to make cosmetic edits?

These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the February 2022 Bots Newsletter. Tune in, or miss out!

Signing off... jp×g 23:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

The Dark Nebula

Hi, I tried to place this entry on Misplaced Pages some years ago & was cited as plagiarising an entry on comixpedia. That listing was indeed by me so i was not copying that post but, instead, reposting on Misplaced Pages, unaware that was not appropriate. I am attempting to post this on Misplaced Pages again & would like to know what is required to be removed or altered so that it would indeed be complying with the rules. I'm 62 years of age & not as tech-savvy as i would otherwise like to be.

I should point out that comixpedia is no longer what it was. In fact, if you click on the link for Comixpedia or more specifically the entry regarding The Dark Nebula it is all an Indonesian Gaming/Gambling site, nothing to do with The Dark Nebula or Comics in any way, shape or form.

To be clear the substance of the proposed entry originated from me, including images. I hope a resolution can be reached.

I leave this in your hands.

Thank you The Dark Nebula (talk) 08:57, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Ten years later

Hi Coren,

I resolved when I became an admin that I'd swing by here the first time I had a block overturned, even if you were inactive; and after 6 months and 1,421 blocks that's finally happened, sadly, so here I am. You probably don't remember me, but ten years and two usernames ago (Francophonie&Androphilie, kinda cringe name) you indeffed me and then reversed yourself after objections at AN/I. I expected I'd have something to say, when this day did come, about what I've learned from having a block overturned, but really all I can say is that it's unpleasant—both getting it wrong and being told you got it wrong—which is no great insight. But I guess I thought it might please (or at least amuse) you to know I stuck around and am an admin now; and also thought I'd take this as an opportunity to say hi and ask how you've been doing. Maybe you won't see this for a year or won't see it ever, but can't hurt to ask.

-- Tamzin (she|they|xe) 22:13, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WMFLabsIP

Template:WMFLabsIP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Csb-day

Template:Csb-day has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)