| Revision as of 23:02, 11 August 2012 editUcuchaBot (talk | contribs)Bots5,146 edits Bot edit: Notice that José Paranhos, Viscount of Rio Branco will appear as today's featured article in the near future← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:28, 10 November 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,380,764 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Lecen/Archive 23. (BOT)Tag: Manual revert | ||
| (850 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{email user}} | |||
| {{TOCleft}} | {{TOCleft}} | ||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | ||
| Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
| {{-}} | {{-}} | ||
| Hello. I recently gave a point of view on ]. You removed what I had written and claimed I may be a sock puppet. I wanted to confirm that I am not (just not a super active editor unless I see something I can improve) but given my inexperience with Misplaced Pages editing and not wanting to start an edit war. I just wanted to ask if there is something I did wrong and if I am not allowed to give my point of view on that topic. My apologies for contacting you like this, I want to take this as a learning opportunity. Thanks -- ] (]) 07:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Re:A Brazilian editor? == | |||
| :I will indeed request a sock puppetry in your case. I'm amazed that an account was reactivated after three years and with the sole purpose of participating in a move request. --] (]) 14:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::You might be right. But it's not your judgment to make. ]] 16:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :{{U|Hakimsheriff}}, I've restored your comment, which should not have been removed. Lecen, you were way out of line removing it. ]] 08:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::I tried really hard, but despite all of it... I couldn't care about what you said. --] (]) 14:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :::You'll care if you're blocked. Don't remove others' comments again based on your vague suspicions. ]] 16:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Nope. I still won't care. Threats such as that is the reason why I stopped writing for Misplaced Pages. It's the en encyclopedia's loss, not mine. You'll have to try harder. --] (]) 16:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Your inability to learn to follow policies and guidelines is the reason you stopped writing, I suspect; that removing others' posts is a no-no (]), as are accusations without evidence (]), is stuff you learn the first week. I agree it's unfortunate, but if you can't learn to get along then you're no use to the project. ]] 17:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::No SPI report, I see. Huh. ]] 01:59, 16 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| Oi, Lacen. Sim, sou do Brasil, mais precisamente do Rio Grande do Sul. É impressionante o número de artigos que destacou aqui, parabéns. Obrigado pelas boas vindas e boas contribuições.<span style="text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #4698FF;">] <sup>]</sup></span> 12:29, 31 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Eu adoraria, mas quais são as tarefas? Vou me inscrever.<span style="text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #4698FF;">] <sup>]</sup></span> 12:50, 31 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Stop deleting my contributions out of spite. You may choose to hate me, but bringing out that hate by deliberating obliterating my contributions is simply evil. ] (]) 07:23, 2 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: SIgnatures == | |||
| All done as you requested. ] (]) 11:19, 3 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: " Pedro I of Brazil" == | |||
| Hi Lecen, glad to see you actively contributing content again! Concerning my edit, I was referring to their titles. You (quite rightly) listed two of them as Princes of Beira, but left the princesses without their titles through marriage. I'm not aware of any policy on this, so it's mainly a personal preference thing to better help inform readers. No worries for reverting it, but I like consistency and always try to list the titles they were known as in their lifetime (see infobox in ] for another example). Regards, ''']''' ]] 00:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Main page appearance: José Paranhos, Viscount of Rio Branco == | |||
| This is a note to let the main editors of ] know that the article will be appearing as ] on August 16, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at ]. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director {{user|Raul654}} or his delegate {{user|Dabomb87}}, or start a discussion at ]. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at ]. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below: | |||
| <blockquote> | |||
| <div style="float:left;margin:0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0;">]</div> | |||
| ''']''' (1819–1880) was a politician, monarchist,{{sfn|Nabuco|1975|p=713}} diplomat, teacher and journalist of the ]. In 1871, Rio Branco became the ] (Prime Minister) for the first time. He would become the Council's longest-serving president, and his cabinet the second longest, in ]. His government was marked by a time of economic prosperity and the enactment of several necessary reforms—though they proved to be seriously flawed. The most important of these initiatives was the ], which granted ] status to children born to slave women. Having become one of the main leaders of the Conservative Party, the passage of this law increased Rio Branco's popularity. However, his government was plagued by a long crisis with the ] that had resulted from the expulsion of ] from its ]hoods. After more than four years heading the Cabinet, Rio Branco resigned in 1875. Following a long vacation in Europe, his health swiftly declined and he was diagnosed with ]. Rio Branco died in 1880 and was widely mourned throughout the country. He is regarded by most historians as one of Brazil's greatest statesmen. (''']''') | |||
| </blockquote> | |||
| ] (]) 23:02, 11 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:28, 10 November 2024
 Archives (Index) |
Hello. I recently gave a point of view on Talk:Luiz_Inácio_Lula_da_Silva#Requested_move_8_November_2019. You removed what I had written and claimed I may be a sock puppet. I wanted to confirm that I am not (just not a super active editor unless I see something I can improve) but given my inexperience with Misplaced Pages editing and not wanting to start an edit war. I just wanted to ask if there is something I did wrong and if I am not allowed to give my point of view on that topic. My apologies for contacting you like this, I want to take this as a learning opportunity. Thanks -- Hakimsheriff (talk) 07:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- I will indeed request a sock puppetry in your case. I'm amazed that an account was reactivated after three years and with the sole purpose of participating in a move request. --Lecen (talk) 14:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- You might be right. But it's not your judgment to make. EEng 16:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hakimsheriff, I've restored your comment, which should not have been removed. Lecen, you were way out of line removing it. EEng 08:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- I tried really hard, but despite all of it... I couldn't care about what you said. --Lecen (talk) 14:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- You'll care if you're blocked. Don't remove others' comments again based on your vague suspicions. EEng 16:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nope. I still won't care. Threats such as that is the reason why I stopped writing for Misplaced Pages. It's the en encyclopedia's loss, not mine. You'll have to try harder. --Lecen (talk) 16:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- Your inability to learn to follow policies and guidelines is the reason you stopped writing, I suspect; that removing others' posts is a no-no (WP:TPO), as are accusations without evidence (WP:PA), is stuff you learn the first week. I agree it's unfortunate, but if you can't learn to get along then you're no use to the project. EEng 17:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- No SPI report, I see. Huh. EEng 01:59, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- Your inability to learn to follow policies and guidelines is the reason you stopped writing, I suspect; that removing others' posts is a no-no (WP:TPO), as are accusations without evidence (WP:PA), is stuff you learn the first week. I agree it's unfortunate, but if you can't learn to get along then you're no use to the project. EEng 17:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nope. I still won't care. Threats such as that is the reason why I stopped writing for Misplaced Pages. It's the en encyclopedia's loss, not mine. You'll have to try harder. --Lecen (talk) 16:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- You'll care if you're blocked. Don't remove others' comments again based on your vague suspicions. EEng 16:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- I tried really hard, but despite all of it... I couldn't care about what you said. --Lecen (talk) 14:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC)